+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Date post: 20-Jul-2016
Category:
Upload: ghulam-jaffar
View: 79 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
chem
25
Electronic spectra of transition metal complexes
Transcript
Page 1: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Electronic spectra of transition metal complexes

Page 2: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Characteristics of electronic spectra

a) Wavelength Energy of electronic transition

b) Shape. Gaussian Band Shape - coupling of electronic and vibrational states

c) Intensity. Molar absorptivity, (M1cm1) due to probability of electronic transitions.

d) Number of bands Transitions between States of given dn configuration.

Page 3: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II
Page 4: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Electronic transitions are controlled by quantum mechanical selection rules which determine the probability (intensity) of the transition.

Transition εmax (M1cm1)

Spin and Symmetry forbidden "d-d" bands 0.02 - 1

Spin allowed and Symmetry forbidden "d-d" bands (Oh) 1 - 10 (Td) 10 – 103

Spin and Symmetry allowed LMCT and MLCT bands 103 - 5 x 104

Band intensity in electronic spectra ()

Page 5: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Spin Selection Rule: There must be no change in the spin multiplicity (2S + 1) during the transition.

i.e. the spin of the electron must not change during the transition.

Symmetry (Laporte) Selection Rule: There must be a change in parity (g ↔ u) during the transition

Since s and d orbitals are g (gerade) and p orbitals are u(ungerade), only s ↔ p and p ↔ d transitions are allowed and d → d transition are formally forbidden. [i.e. only transitions for which Δl = ± 1 are allowed]. d → d bands are allowed to the extent that the starting or terminal level of the transition is not a pure d-orbital. (i.e. it is a molecular orbital of the complex with both metal and ligand character).

Page 6: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

States for dn configurationsRussel-Saunders Coupling

• Angular momentum of individual electrons couple to give total angular momentum for dn configuration ML = ∑ml

• Spin momentum of individual electron spins couple together to give total spin, S = ∑s

• Inter-electronic repulsions between the electrons in the d orbitals give rise to ground state and excited states for dn configurations.

• States are labeled with Tern Symbols

• Electonic transitions between ground and excited states are summarized in Orgel and Tanabe-Sugano diagrams .

• Term Symbols (labels for states) contain information about L and S for state Hund’s Rules. i) Ground state has maximum spin, S ii) For states of same spin, ground state has maximum L.

Page 7: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Triple degeneracy of a d2 ion’s 3T2g

ground state due to three possible sites for hole in t2g level

Singly degenerate 3T2g ground state. Only one possible arrangement for three electrons in t2g level

Singly degenerate 3T2g ground state. Only one possible arrangement for six t2g electrons.

Triple degenerate ground state for d7 Three possible sites for hole in t2g level

eg

t2g

Ground State Excited States

eg

t2g

eg

t2g

eg

t2g

d2

d3

d7

d8

Number of d-d bands in electronic spectrumExcitation from ground state to excited stated of dn configuration

Page 8: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Labeling of d-d bands in electronic spectrum.

• Consider states of dn configuration

• Determine free ion ground state Term Symbol (labels for states)

• Assign splitting of states in ligand field

• Spectroscopic labeling of bands.

• Orgel diagrams (high-spin)• Tanabe-Sugano diagrams (high-spin and low-spin)

Page 9: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Individual electron l = 2, ml = 2, 1, 0, -1, -2Maximum ml = l

l = 0, 1, 2, 3, Orbital: s, p, d , f _______________________________

dn configuration, L = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 Term Symbol S, P, D, F, G

ML = Σ ml, maximum ML = L

Spin Multiplicity = 2 S +1

Page 10: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Free ion ground state Term Symbols for dn configurations

Term Symbols (labels for states) contain information about L and S for ground state

Hund’s Rules. i) Ground state has maximum spin, S

ii) For states of same spin, ground state has maximum L

2 1 0 -1 -2ml =l = 2,SL 2S + 1

2 1/2 2

3 1 3

3 3/2 4

2 2 5

0 5/2 6

L = ML(max) ML = ml S = s

Termsymbol

2D

3F

4F

5D

6S

Page 11: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

2 1 0 -1 -2ml =l = 2,SL 2S + 1

2 2 5

3 3/2 4

3 1 3

2 1/2 2

0 0 1

L = ML(max) ML = ml S = s

Termsymbol

5D

4F

3F

2D

1S

d6

d7

d8

d9

d10

Page 12: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Term Symbol2D3F

4F5D6S

d1

d2

d4d3

d5

d9

d8

d6d7

Free Ion Ground Statedn Splitting of States in Oh ligand field

2D 2T2g + 2Eg

3F4F5D6S

3T1g + 3T2g + 3A2g

4T1g + 4T2g + 4A2g5T2g + 5Eg

6A1g

Page 13: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Splitting of the weak field dn ground state terms in an octahedral ligand field

Correlation of spectroscopic terms for dn configuration in Oh complexes

AtomicTerm

Numberof states

Terms in OhSymmetry

S 1 A1gP 3 T1gD 5 T2g + EgF 7 T1g + T2g + A2g

Ground state determined by inspection of degeneracy of terms for given dn

Page 14: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II
Page 15: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

od1 od2 d3 od4

2T2g

2Eg

2D 4F

3A2g

3T2g

3T1g

4A2go

4T1g

4T2g

5Eg

5T2g

5D3F

4T1g(P)

3P 4P

3T1g(P)

2T2g2Eg 3T1g

3T2g

3T1g

3T1g

3A2g

3T1g(P)

Orgel Diagrams

Ti3+ V2+ Cr3+ Mn3+

Page 16: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

The d-d bands of the d2 ion [V(H2O)6]3+

Page 17: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

(a) [Ni(H20)6]2+ (b) [Ni(NH3)6]2+

Page 18: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

3F

3P

1S

1D

d2

E(3F) = A - 8B

E(1D) = A - 3B + 2C

E(3P) = A+7B

Racah Inter-electronic Repulsion Parameters (B, C)

3F 3P3F 1D

= 15B

= 5B + 2C

1G

Page 19: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

The Tanabe-Sugano diagram for the d2 ion

Page 20: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Evidence for covalent bonding in metal-ligand interactionsThe Nephelauxetic Effect (“cloud expansion”)

Reduction in electron-electron repulsion upon complex formation

Racah Parameter, B: electron-elctronic repulsion parameter

Bo is the inter- electronic repulsion in the gaseous Mn+ ion.B is the inter- electronic repulsion in the complexed MLx

n+ ion.

The smaller values for B in the complex compared to free gaseous ion is taken as evidence of smaller inter-electronic repulsion in the complex due to a larger “molecular orbital” on account of overlap

of ligand and metal orbital, i.e. evidence of covalency (cloud expansion”).

Nephelauxetic Ratio, β = B Bo

Page 21: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Nephelauxetic Effect

Nephelauxetic Ligand Series

I < Br < CN < Cl < NCS < C2O42- < en < NH3 < H2O < F

Small β Large β Covalent Ionic

Nephelauxetic Metal Series

Pt4+ < Co3+ < Rh3+~Ir3+ < Fe3+ < Cr3+ < Ni2+ < V4+< Pt2+~ Mn2+ Small β Large β Large overlap Small overlap

Covalent Ionic

Page 22: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Empirical Racah parameters, h, kβ = 1– [h(ligand) x k(metal)]

Cr(NH3)63+ β = 1 –hk

β = 1 –(1.4)(0.21) = 0.706

Cr(CN)63- β = 1 –hk

β = 1 –(2.0)(0.21) = 0.580

Bo - B = hligands x kmetal ion

Bo

Page 23: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II
Page 24: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

Typical Δo and λmax values for octahedral (ML6) d-block metal complexes__________________________________________________________________Complex Δo cm-1 ~ λmax (nm) Complex Δo cm-1 λmax (nm)___________________________________________________________________________________[Ti(H2O)6]3+ 20,300 493 [Fe(H2O)6]2+ 9,400 1064[V(H2O)6]3+ 20,300 493 [Fe(H2O)6]3+ 13,700 730[V(H2O)6]2+ 12,400 806 [Fe(CN)6]3- 35,000 286[CrF6]3- 15,000 667 [Fe(CN)6]4- 33,800 296[Co(H2O)6]3+, l.s. 20,700 483 [Fe(C2O4)3]3- 14,100 709[Cr(H2O)6]2+ 14,100 709 [Co(CN)6]3- l.s. 34,800 287[Cr(H2O)6]3+ 17,400 575 [Co(NH3)6]3+ l.s. 22,900 437[Cr(NH3)6]3+ 21,600 463 [Ni(H2O)6]2+ 8,500 1176[Cr(en)3]3+ 21,900 457 [Ni(NH3)6]2+ 10,800 926[Cr(CN)6]3- 26,600 376 [Ni(en)3]2+ 11,500 870___________________________________________________________________________________

Page 25: 3. Ligand Field Theory-II

1. Assign the metal oxidation state in the following compounds.

a. K2[PtCl6]b. Na2[Fe(CO)4]c. [Mn(CH3)(CO)5]

2. Account for the following:

The manganous ion, [Mn(H2O)6]2+, reacts with CN- to form [Mn(CN)6]4- which has

= 1.95 B.M., but with I- to give [MnI4]2- which has = 5.93 B. M.

[Co(NH3)6]Cl3 is diamagnetic, whereas Na3[CoF6] is paramagnetic ( = 5.02 B.M).

[PtBr2Cl2]2 is diamagnetic and exists in two isomeric forms, whereas [NiBr2Cl2]2

has a magnetic moment, = 3.95 B.M., and does not exhibit isomerism.

Copper(II) complexes are typically blue with one visible absorption band in their

electronic spectra whereas copper(I) complexes are generally colorless. Assign a spectroscopic label to the Cu2+ transition.


Recommended