+ All Categories
Home > Environment > 3.1 WORKSHOP ON PARTNER COUNTRY PERSPECTIVES FOR TRACKING DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE- AND...

3.1 WORKSHOP ON PARTNER COUNTRY PERSPECTIVES FOR TRACKING DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE- AND...

Date post: 24-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: development-co-operation-directorate-dcd-dac
View: 154 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
13
OECD DAC Task Team Workshop Partner Country Perspective for Tracking Domestic Climate and Biodiversity Finance David Kaluba May, 2015
Transcript

OECD DAC Task Team Workshop

Partner Country Perspective for Tracking Domestic Climate and Biodiversity Finance

David Kaluba

May, 2015

Outline Zambia’s climate change Objective

Inclusive Green Growth Approach

Budget Tracking

Domestic

International

Baseline and Early Results – Domestic and International

Lessons Learned

Next Steps

Zambia’s Goal

To mainstream climate change into the most economically and vulnerable sectors of the economy, in order to ensure sustainable economic development towards the attainment of the country’s Vision 2030 (Become a Middle Income Country)

7th National Development as the vehicle for upscaling planning and measurement of results.

Inclusive Green Growth Approach Strategic Environment Assessment

Economy

•Macro-economics

•Poverty reduction

•Infrastructure

•Agriculture

•ICT, e.t.c

Environment

•Climate change

•Biodiversity

•Pollution control

Social

•Gender

•Education

•Health

Inclusive Green Growth Approach

Integration of Low Carbon and Climate Resilient

• Mainstreams climate change adaptation and mitigation into national plans and strategies;

• Assists communities in highly vulnerable areas to identify and address their own climate change adaptation and mitigation options as part of local development plans;

• Incorporates climate resilience into existing community development funds to ensure their sustainability;

• Invests in highly visible infrastructure as a way to rally public support for adaptation;

• Builds on partnerships, particularly with private sector and civil society;

• Relies on the transformative power of communication technologies;

• Strengthens the institutional foundation for a future climate change programme in Zambia.

BUDGET TRACKING -Objective

Allocations to climate resilient Programmes increasing by

25%/in real terms for vulnerable sectors

(agriculture, environment and natural resources, energy and water, infrastructure, health

and disaster management) by 2025, relative to 2007-2011

baseline

STRATEGIC PROGRAMME FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE -Domestic

Baseline K’BILLION

Sector 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Agriculture 54.0 68.7 73.5 65.2 23.7

Environment and Natural Resources 40.0 17.4 24.6 23.4 22.4

Energy and Water 14.7 16.0 10.9 15.9 15.6

Infrastructure:

Works and Supply 0 16.5 0.2 0.7 1.7

Communications and Transport 2.9 3.7 1.3 4.1 2.2

Disaster Management 4.0 3.7 3.6 2.4 35.81

TOTAL Above Sectors 115.5 126.0 114.2 111.7 101.4

By the conclusion of the SPCR ( or 2025), Zambia aims to increase allocations to climate-

resilient programmes by 25% in real terms

Real term allocations to climate-resilient programmes (2007-2011)-7 % rise on average

STRATEGIC PROGRAMME SUPPORT MAINSTREAMING –

Domestic Early Results indicate an 8% increase on average

Allocation to Mainstreamed Programs per Sector 2012

K billion 2013

K billion

Agriculture 61.9 40.7

Environment & Natural Resources 23.3 36.9

Energy and Water 24.5 22.9

DMMU 32.8 33.3

Infrastructure - -

A1-Ministry of Works and Supply 0.7 3.3

A2-Ministry of Communications and Transport 3.4 16.1

Total Mainstreamed 146.6 153.2

International – Comparative Baseline

OECD, Green Growth papers, Green Development Cooperation in Zambia, December 2014 Total Green bilateral ODA committed by the members

of the OECD DAC reached 30% of the total ODA commitments to the country over 2010-2012 (USD 230 million) up from 6% of total bilateral ODA commitments over 2004-2006 (USD90 million). Environment USD 133.4 million

Biodiversity USD 18.9 million

Desertification USD 12.8 million

Climate Change Mitigation USD 76.8 million

Climate Change Adaptation USD 65.8 million

Challenges Structure of the Domestic Budget makes little

recognition of climate finance. As such it is hard to tell specific items relating to climate change finance;

Tracking the Budget alone is inadequate – need for mechanism to verify the actual expenditures and outcomes to measure the outcomes against indicators;

Government structural complexity limits access to sources of data-large number of players involved;

No specific mechanism to track international follows – ICCS mechanism could help reduce challenge

Next Steps: Further Studies

Analyze and track sector programme budgets and expenditures related to climate change in the 2013 and 2014 national budgets;

Review and update the tracking tool already designed for consistency in

allocations and assess the adequacy of the tracking tool and recommend improvements;

Review the allocations to the various sectors and provinces and look at the flow

of resources, how they are disbursed and if they are spent as planned; Engage key stakeholders to identify the key issues, determine the structure of

resource flows and the institutional setup, review data availability and choose appropriate survey tool; and

To provide information and wider understanding that will inform discussions

and decisions at national level in relation to improving and streamlining access to climate change resources.

Recommend an information management system that will enhance tracking of

resources towards climate change programmes across sectors, provinces and districts

Twatasha Mukwai!!

Thank you very much!!

Budget Tracking What definitions are being used in-country to track

climate change mitigation, adaptation and biodiversity activities?

How are climate- and/or biodiversity-related activities identified in national, sub-national and sectoral budgets? What methodologies and approaches are used?

What are the challenges experienced in tracking climate- and biodiversity-related finance?


Recommended