Date post: | 24-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Environment |
Upload: | development-co-operation-directorate-dcd-dac |
View: | 154 times |
Download: | 0 times |
OECD DAC Task Team Workshop
Partner Country Perspective for Tracking Domestic Climate and Biodiversity Finance
David Kaluba
May, 2015
Outline Zambia’s climate change Objective
Inclusive Green Growth Approach
Budget Tracking
Domestic
International
Baseline and Early Results – Domestic and International
Lessons Learned
Next Steps
Zambia’s Goal
To mainstream climate change into the most economically and vulnerable sectors of the economy, in order to ensure sustainable economic development towards the attainment of the country’s Vision 2030 (Become a Middle Income Country)
7th National Development as the vehicle for upscaling planning and measurement of results.
Inclusive Green Growth Approach Strategic Environment Assessment
Economy
•Macro-economics
•Poverty reduction
•Infrastructure
•Agriculture
•ICT, e.t.c
Environment
•Climate change
•Biodiversity
•Pollution control
Social
•Gender
•Education
•Health
Inclusive Green Growth Approach
Integration of Low Carbon and Climate Resilient
• Mainstreams climate change adaptation and mitigation into national plans and strategies;
• Assists communities in highly vulnerable areas to identify and address their own climate change adaptation and mitigation options as part of local development plans;
• Incorporates climate resilience into existing community development funds to ensure their sustainability;
• Invests in highly visible infrastructure as a way to rally public support for adaptation;
• Builds on partnerships, particularly with private sector and civil society;
• Relies on the transformative power of communication technologies;
• Strengthens the institutional foundation for a future climate change programme in Zambia.
BUDGET TRACKING -Objective
Allocations to climate resilient Programmes increasing by
25%/in real terms for vulnerable sectors
(agriculture, environment and natural resources, energy and water, infrastructure, health
and disaster management) by 2025, relative to 2007-2011
baseline
STRATEGIC PROGRAMME FOR CLIMATE RESILIENCE -Domestic
Baseline K’BILLION
Sector 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Agriculture 54.0 68.7 73.5 65.2 23.7
Environment and Natural Resources 40.0 17.4 24.6 23.4 22.4
Energy and Water 14.7 16.0 10.9 15.9 15.6
Infrastructure:
Works and Supply 0 16.5 0.2 0.7 1.7
Communications and Transport 2.9 3.7 1.3 4.1 2.2
Disaster Management 4.0 3.7 3.6 2.4 35.81
TOTAL Above Sectors 115.5 126.0 114.2 111.7 101.4
By the conclusion of the SPCR ( or 2025), Zambia aims to increase allocations to climate-
resilient programmes by 25% in real terms
Real term allocations to climate-resilient programmes (2007-2011)-7 % rise on average
STRATEGIC PROGRAMME SUPPORT MAINSTREAMING –
Domestic Early Results indicate an 8% increase on average
Allocation to Mainstreamed Programs per Sector 2012
K billion 2013
K billion
Agriculture 61.9 40.7
Environment & Natural Resources 23.3 36.9
Energy and Water 24.5 22.9
DMMU 32.8 33.3
Infrastructure - -
A1-Ministry of Works and Supply 0.7 3.3
A2-Ministry of Communications and Transport 3.4 16.1
Total Mainstreamed 146.6 153.2
International – Comparative Baseline
OECD, Green Growth papers, Green Development Cooperation in Zambia, December 2014 Total Green bilateral ODA committed by the members
of the OECD DAC reached 30% of the total ODA commitments to the country over 2010-2012 (USD 230 million) up from 6% of total bilateral ODA commitments over 2004-2006 (USD90 million). Environment USD 133.4 million
Biodiversity USD 18.9 million
Desertification USD 12.8 million
Climate Change Mitigation USD 76.8 million
Climate Change Adaptation USD 65.8 million
Challenges Structure of the Domestic Budget makes little
recognition of climate finance. As such it is hard to tell specific items relating to climate change finance;
Tracking the Budget alone is inadequate – need for mechanism to verify the actual expenditures and outcomes to measure the outcomes against indicators;
Government structural complexity limits access to sources of data-large number of players involved;
No specific mechanism to track international follows – ICCS mechanism could help reduce challenge
Next Steps: Further Studies
Analyze and track sector programme budgets and expenditures related to climate change in the 2013 and 2014 national budgets;
Review and update the tracking tool already designed for consistency in
allocations and assess the adequacy of the tracking tool and recommend improvements;
Review the allocations to the various sectors and provinces and look at the flow
of resources, how they are disbursed and if they are spent as planned; Engage key stakeholders to identify the key issues, determine the structure of
resource flows and the institutional setup, review data availability and choose appropriate survey tool; and
To provide information and wider understanding that will inform discussions
and decisions at national level in relation to improving and streamlining access to climate change resources.
Recommend an information management system that will enhance tracking of
resources towards climate change programmes across sectors, provinces and districts
Budget Tracking What definitions are being used in-country to track
climate change mitigation, adaptation and biodiversity activities?
How are climate- and/or biodiversity-related activities identified in national, sub-national and sectoral budgets? What methodologies and approaches are used?
What are the challenges experienced in tracking climate- and biodiversity-related finance?