Date post: | 18-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | hilda-mathews |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 0 times |
310KM Lab 4 Part 3
Tutorial Group: 2
Student Name: Chan Nga LokFan Ka YanLo Yuen KiTsui Sui Wa
iPhone OS
Authentication of iPhone OS
Authentication methodsPassword (MSCHAPv2)RSA SecureIDCRYPTOCardx.509 Digital CertificatesShared secret
Authentication of iPhone OS
802.1x authentication protocolsEAP-TLSEAP-TTLSEAP-FASTEAP-SIMPEAP v0, v1LEAP
Authentication of iPhone OS
For Wireless Network WPA2 Enterprise
Encryption of iPhone OS
Hardware encryptionAES 256 bit encoding
Internet encryptionSSL v3TLS v1
Data encryption128-bit AES encryption
Strengths of iPhone OS
Objective-C, simple language to learn and use
Huge amount of apps Accessible by everyone (e.g.
VoiceOver) Multi-Touch interface
Weaknesses of iPhone OS
NOT support Flash
Safari NOT support Java
Only one carrier
Deleted data vulnerable to hacker
BlackBerry OS
Authentication of BlackBerry OS
BlackBerry devices are content servers directly
Most of the data are in the BlackBerry server but not device
BlackBerry MDS Connection Service authenticates to content servers on behalf of BlackBerry devices
Data will not leakage easily
Encryption of BlackBerry OS
Data and message will encrypt by using Enterprise Server Express before sent
AES / Triple Des data encryption method are used in the transmission process
Decryption will be done after arrive terminal device
Strengths of BlackBerry OS
Safety and convenience mail communication
classification of the five programs navigation bar are useful and better then old interface
WebKit browser engine improve the browsing efficiency
with more social networking tools, allowing you to combine email, Facebook and Twitter updates all in one place
Delete SurePress function to simply the usage
Weaknesses of BlackBerry OS
Number of Apps are still far behind user needs(BlackBerry: over 8000; Android: 70000; iPhone: 220000)
New OS have no outstanding function compare to other OS
Still do not support Flash
Android OS
Authentication & Encryption in Android OS
Most Android applications use self-signed certificates still does not support hardware-based encryption Open-source
Weakness Easier for hacker to take data off a Micro SD card Hacker can understand the underlying
architecture and source code Cybercriminals will be rushing to take advantage
Authentication & Encryption in Android OS
Strengths Developing enterprise encryption solutions for
data Enforcing standard security policies User administration for predefined Active
Directory and/or LDAP groups Remote application installation
remote lock remote wipe advanced password rules
More secure faster than a close OS
Strengths of Android
Lies in the future
Strengths of Android OS
Roadmap of Android OS cost of innovation is borne largely by
Versatility
Gathered up a group of some like minded partners
Weaknesses of Android OS
Apps don’t look as sexy as the iPhone ones
Inability to download apps to your micro SD card
Competing against one another for shelf-space instead of the iPhone
Window Mobile OS
Authentication of Window Mobile
Windows Mobile 5.0uses ActiveSync desktop to connect
to the corporate CA to receive the required user certificate and associated key
Windows Mobile 6 implementing Transport Layer
Security (TLS) certificate-based authentication
Encryption of Window Mobile
Windows Mobile 6.1 supports AES 128 Encryption for On Device Encryption.There is no way to export the
Encryption KeyThe Encryption Key Changes on Hard
ResetDevice encryption can only be
enabled via a security policy there is no way a user can enable this feature in Windows Mobile.
Encryption of Window Mobile
Windows Mobile 6.0 onward supports AES 128 Encryption for files written to the SD card.There is no way to export the
Encryption KeyThe Encryption Key Changes on
Hard Resett
Strengths of Window Mobile
Available apps: bringing apps into one central location
User interface: turn into a user customizable dream
interface Computer desktop integration:
integrate with both Exchange Servers and with Outlook environments
Weaknesses of Window Mobile
There's no copy and paste functionality.
The OS doesn't support multitasking.
There's no Flash support.
The chosen platform
Reasons
Safety and convenience mail communication management of logistic need fast and secure
WebKit browser engine improve the browsing efficiency convenience to check the stock
With more social networking tools well communication
Recommendations
Invite more programmers to create more applications
Concentrate to develop in an unique function
Develop new technology to support more medias, such as Flash
References
http://www.hiphongkong.com/content/smart_phone_wars_iphone_vs_android_vs_blackberry
http://www.telecoms.com/20036/something-for-everyone/
http://apcmag.com/inside_googles_mobile_phone_new_details_of_android.htm
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/05/android-google-io-walkup/
http://www.pcworld.com/article/196727/first_look_android_22_froyo_with_flash_player_101.html
http://www.gomonews.com/eastern-promises-uk-finally-gets-android-mobile-device-from-lg/
References
http://gigaom.com/mobile/windows-mobile-vs-android-winmo-is-better-than-you-think/
http://www.digitalversus.com/windows-phone-7-impressions-strengths-weaknesses-article-1125.html
http://www.ringhk.com/report2.php?id=3205 http://thecellphonejunkie.com/2010/10/20/att-
blackberry-torch-9800-review/ http://www.informationweek.com/news/mobility/
security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=218600687 Evaluating the iPhone as a Mobile Platform for
People- Centric Sensing Application( by Emiliano Miluzzo en al)