+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 3797s1_02_Forsyth

3797s1_02_Forsyth

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: jauhari-deslo
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 87

Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    1/87

    Biologics License

    Application:Recombinant Human

    Activated Protein C (rhAPC)

    [drotrecogin alfa (activated)]

    Xigris for Severe Sepsis

    Anti-Infective Advisory Committee

    October 16, 2001

    FDA/CBER

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    2/87

    Sponsors Proposed Indication

    rhAPC is indicated for the

    treatment of pediatric and adultpatients with sepsis associated

    with acute organ dysfunction

    (severe sepsis). Treatment withrhAPC reduces mortality in

    patients with severe sepsis.

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    3/87

    Overview of Drotrecogin

    Product Development 13 phase 1 studies:

    8 studies healthy volunteers

    (110 patients) 3 studies end-stage renal disease

    (30 patients)

    1 study heterozygous Protein C deficiency

    (9 patients)

    1 study Purpura fulminans

    (42 patients)

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    4/87

    Overview of Drotrecogin

    Product Development 1 study, phase 2, randomized, double-blind,

    placebo-controlled study of 131 patients withsevere sepsis

    1 study, phase 3, randomized, double-blind,placebo-controlled study of 1690 patients withsevere sepsis

    Pediatric study in 83 patients with severesepsis

    Ongoing, uncontrolled trials in > 500 patients

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    5/87

    Study Design:

    Phase 2 Study Randomized, placebo-controlled,

    dose-ranging, multicenter

    131 patients with severe sepsis rhAPC: 12, 18, 24 or 30 ug/kg/hr

    continuous iv infusion 48 or 96 hours

    Outcome measures Pharmacodynamic & pharmacokinetic

    Safety

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    6/87

    Results:

    Phase 2 Study

    Treatment Patients

    Total (N)

    28-Day Mortality

    N (%)

    rhAPC(all doses)

    90 26 (29%)

    Placebo 41 14 (34%)

    Total 131 P=0.55

    Chi-square test

    Phase 3 dose chosen based on PD effects on D-dimers in

    phase 2

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    7/87

    Study Design:

    Phase 3 Study Randomized, double-blind, single dose,

    placebo-controlled, multicenter study

    rhAPC: 24 ug/kg/hr iv infusion for 96 hours

    2280 patients planned for enrollment

    Inclusion: Severe sepsis

    3 of 4 SIRS criteria

    1 organ failure

    Suspected or proven infection

    Exclusion: patients at high risk for bleeding

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    8/87

    Study Design:

    Final Statistical Analysis Plan Primary efficacy endpoint: 28 day all cause

    mortality

    Primary efficacy analysis: Cochran-Mantel-

    Haenszel test stratified by preinfusion:

    APACHE II quartile

    Age class

    Protein C activity class 2 interim analyses:

    760 patients (alpha level=0.0002), October 1999

    1520 patients (alpha level=0.0118), June 2000

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    9/87

    Study Design:

    Prospectively Defined Secondary

    Analyses Mortality treatment effect by:

    Protein C levels

    APACHE II Age

    Gender, origin

    SOFA, SIRS

    Organ Failure

    Shock, ARDS, DIC

    AT III levels

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    10/87

    Results:

    Demographics Age, Gender, Origin

    DEMOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS rhAPC (850)

    (%)

    Placebo (840)

    (%)

    AGE

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    11/87

    Results:Demographics Disease Severity

    rhAPC (850)(%)

    Placebo (840)(%)

    PREEXISTING CONDITIONS

    Hypertension 38 35

    Myocardial infarction 12 14Congestive cardiomyopathy 6 9

    Diabetes 21 22

    Pancreatitis 3 4

    Liver disease 2 3

    COPD 22 26

    Cancer 17 19

    Recent Trauma 3 5

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    12/87

    Results:

    Demographics Disease Severity

    RECENT

    SURGICAL

    HISTORY

    rhAPC (850)

    (%)

    Placebo (840)

    (%)

    Elective surgery 6 6

    Emergency

    Surgery

    21 21

    No history of

    surgery

    74 73

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    13/87

    Results:

    Demographics Disease SeverityMEASURE OF DISEASE

    SEVERITY

    rhAPC (850) Placebo (840)

    APACHE II score mean 25 25

    Mechanical ventilation (%) 73 78

    Shock (%) 70 72

    Use of any vasopressor (%) 72 76

    Use of dobutamine (%) 14 14

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    14/87

    Results:

    Demographics Disease Severity

    # of ORGAN

    FAILURES (OF)

    rhAPC (850)

    (%)

    Placebo (840)

    (%)

    1 25 24

    2 32 33

    3 25 26

    4 14 14

    5 4 4

    *Time from 1stOF to start drug 18 hours 17 hours

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    15/87

    Results:

    Phase 3 Study

    Primary Efficacy EndpointTreatment Patients

    (N)

    28-Day

    Mortality

    N (%)

    rhAPC 850 210 (24.7%)

    Placebo 840 259 (30.8%)

    Total 1690 Stratified, CMH

    p=0.005

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    16/87

    Results:Primary Efficacy Endpoint

    ITT Population

    0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28

    TIME (Days)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    SURVIVAL(%)

    Placebo rhAPC

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    17/87

    Review of Mortality Effect

    by Patient Subgroups

    Patient age

    Disease severity

    APACHE II Organ failure

    Shock

    Hematologic parameters Protein C DIC

    Use of heparin

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    18/87

    Results:

    Mortality as a Function of Age

    Age

    (years)

    rhAPC

    (850)

    Mortality

    (%)

    Placebo

    (840)

    Mortality

    (%)

    Mort

    Diff

    (%)

    RR 95%

    CI

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    19/87

    Results:

    Mortality as a Function of Age

    010

    20

    30

    4050

    60

    18-20

    n= (16)

    21-30

    (86)

    31-40

    (136)

    41-50

    (217)

    51-60

    (286)

    61-70

    (356)

    71-80

    (451)

    81-90

    (129)

    91-100

    (13)

    Age (years)

    M

    ortality(%)

    Placebo rhAPC

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    20/87

    Review of Mortality Effect

    by Patient Subgroups

    Patient age

    Disease severity

    APACHE II Organ failure

    Shock

    Hematologic parameters Protein C

    DIC

    Use of heparin

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    21/87

    APACHE II: Disease severity

    Acute physiology and chronic health

    evaluation (Knaus 1985)

    Index used to predict mortality in ICUsetting

    Uses physiologic measurements, age

    and chronic health status

    R lt

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    22/87

    Results:Mortality as a Function of

    APACHE II at Study EntryApache

    Quartile

    (score)

    rhAPC (850)

    Mortality

    (%)

    Placebo (840)

    Mortality

    (%)

    Mort

    Diff

    (%)

    RR 95% CI

    1st

    (3-19)33 /218

    (15)26 /215

    (12)+3 1.25 0.78,2.02

    2nd

    (20-24)

    49 /218

    (22)

    57 /222

    (26)

    -4 0.88 0.63,

    1.22

    3rd

    (25-29)48 /204

    (24)58 /162

    (36)-12 0.66 0.48,

    0.91

    4th

    (30-53)

    80 /210

    (38)

    118 /241

    (49)

    -11 0.78 0.63,

    0.96

    interaction p = 0.09

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    23/87

    Results:Mortality as a Function of APACHE II

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    5060

    70

    80

    5-10

    n=(24)

    10-15

    (152)

    15-20

    (330)

    20-25

    (456)

    25-30

    (345)

    30-35

    (227)

    35-40

    (102)

    40-45

    (37)

    45-50

    (13)

    APACHE II

    Mortality(%)

    Placebo rhAPC

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    24/87

    Results:

    Mortality as a Function of

    APACHE II QuartilesAPACHE II

    Quartiles

    (score)

    rhAPC

    (850)

    Mortality

    (%)

    Placebo

    (840)

    Mortality

    (%)

    Mort

    Diff

    (%)

    RR 95%

    CI

    Q1+Q2

    (

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    25/87

    Results:

    Mortality as a Function of Organ Failure

    # OF rhAPC (850)

    Mortality (%)

    Placebo (840)

    Mortality (%)

    Mort

    Diff (%)

    RR 95% CI

    1 42 /215

    (20)

    43 /203

    (21)

    -1 0.92 0.63,

    1.35

    2 56 /270

    (21)

    71/273

    (26)

    -5 0.80 0.59,

    1.08

    3 56 /214

    (26)

    75 /218

    (34)

    -8 0.76 0.57,

    1.02

    4 46 /119

    (39)

    54 /116

    (47)

    -8 0.83 0.62,

    1.12

    5 10 /31

    (32)

    16 /30

    (53)

    -21 0.60 0.33,

    1.11

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    26/87

    Results:Mortality as a Function Disease

    Severity (Organ Failure)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    1 2 3 4 5

    Number of Organ Dysfunctions

    Mortality(%

    )

    Placebo

    rhAPC

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    27/87

    Mortality as a Function of

    Shock

    Shock rhAPC

    Mortality

    (%)

    Placebo

    Mortality

    (%)

    Mort

    Diff

    (%)

    RR 95%

    CI RR

    No 53 /252

    (21)

    53 /238

    (22)

    -1 0.94 0.67,

    1.32

    Yes 157 /598

    (26)

    206 /602

    (34)

    -8 0.77 0.64,

    0.91

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    28/87

    Results:

    Summary of Treatment Effect by

    APACHE II & Organ Failure & ShockALL PATIENTS

    APACHE - Q1

    APACHE - Q2

    APACHE - Q3

    APACHE - Q4

    OF - 1

    OF - 2

    OF - 3

    OF - 4

    OF - 5

    SHOCK - Absent

    SHOCK - Present

    0.1 1 10rhAPC Better Placebo Better

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    29/87

    Review of Mortality Effect

    by Patient Subgroups

    Patient age

    Disease severity

    APACHE II Organ failure

    Shock

    Hematologic parameters Protein C

    DIC

    Use of heparin

    R lt

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    30/87

    Results:

    Mortality as a Function of

    Protein C LevelsProtein C

    Def

    rhAPC

    Mortality

    (%)

    Placebo

    Mortality

    (%)

    Mort

    Diff

    (%)

    RR 95% CI

    Deficient(80%)

    182 /709(26)

    215 /670(32)

    -6 0.80 0.68,0.95

    Not

    deficient

    (>80%)

    14 /90

    (16)

    28 /105

    (27)

    -11 0.58 0.33,

    1.04

    Unknown

    or Absent

    14 /51

    (28)

    16 /65

    (25)

    +3 1.12 0.60,

    2.07

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    31/87

    Results:

    Mortality in Patients with

    Laboratory Evidence of DIC

    DIC rhAPC

    Mortality(%)

    Placebo

    Mortality(%)

    Mort

    Diff

    (%)

    RR 95%

    CI

    DIC 196 /800

    (25)

    243 /774

    (31)

    -6 0.78 0.67,

    0.92

    Unknownor Absent 14 /49

    (29)16 /66(24)

    +5 1.18 0.65,2.16

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    32/87

    Review of Mortality Effect

    by Patient Subgroups

    Patient age

    Disease severity

    APACHE II Organ failure

    Shock

    Hematologic parameters Protein C

    DIC

    Use of heparin

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    33/87

    Results:Mortality as a Function of Heparin Use

    rhAPCTotal N (%)

    PlaceboTotal N (%)

    Mort Diff(%)

    Heparin

    At

    baseline

    532 138 (26) 559 170 (30) 4

    During

    infusion

    634 158 (25) 637 179 (28) 3

    Not on Heparin

    At

    baseline

    318 72 (23) 281 89 (32) 9

    During

    infusion

    216 52 (24) 203 80 (39) 15

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    34/87

    Morbidity Outcomes

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    35/87

    Results:

    Functional Status at Day 28

    32.3 30.6

    7.2 7.9

    23.5 20.9

    12.29.8

    24.730.8

    rhAPC PLACEBO0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    Home

    NursHome

    Hosp

    ICU

    DIED

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    36/87

    Protocol Amendment June 1999-after trial initiated

    Sponsor blinded Before 1stinterim analysis

    Primary Analytic Plan Elimination of PC deficiency status and septic

    shock as covariates from the CMH analysis Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

    Esophageal varices

    Cirrhosis

    Transplant patients Moribund patients

    Pancreatitis

    Malignancy

    Definition of OF

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    37/87

    Effect of Protocol Change:Original vs. Amended Protocol

    malignancy (21% vs 16%)

    immunosuppressed (11% vs. 8%)

    withdrawal of life support (17% vs. 13%)

    APACHE II chronic health points (25% vs. 17%)

    non-sepsis related death (5% vs. 4%)

    at nursing home facilities (8% vs. 6%)

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    38/87

    Effect of Protocol Change:Original vs. Amended Protocol

    Higher Il-6 median levels in amended

    (566 ug/ml vs. 389 ug/ml )

    Mean APACHE II scores same at

    baseline (25)

    Acidosis more common under original

    protocol than amended (46% vs. 26%)

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    39/87

    Effect of Protocol Change:

    DNR Orders

    79 (16)50 (10)Amendment A

    64 (18)57 (16)Original

    Placebo

    N (%)

    rhAPC

    N (%)

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    40/87

    Mortality:Original vs. Amended Protocol

    Strata Total Therapy Died by

    Day 28

    Original 360 rhAPC 102 (28)360 Placebo 109 (30)

    720 P=0.5665

    Amended 490 rhAPC 108 (22)480 Placebo 150 (31)

    970 P=0.0012

    1690

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    41/87

    Cumulative 28 Day

    Mortality Over Time

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    42/87

    Sensitivity Analysis:

    Patients on Pre-Amendment Not

    Eligible Under Post-Amendment

    Meet

    New

    Incl

    rhAPCMortality

    Total N N (%)

    PlaceboMortality

    Total N N (%)

    RR 95%

    CI

    No 41 14 (34) 40 17 (43) 0.80 0.46,

    1.40

    Yes 319 88 (28) 320 92 (29) 0.96 0.75,1.23

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    43/87

    Summary of Efficacy

    28 day all cause mortality

    24.7% rhAPC vs. 30.8% placebo

    (p=0.005)

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    44/87

    Summary of Efficacy

    Additional analyses suggest

    treatment benefit predominant:

    3rdand 4thAPACHE II quartile

    laboratory evidence DIC

    not on heparin

    > 50 years of age

    2 OF

    shock

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    45/87

    Outline of Presentation

    Pediatrics

    Adult safety phase 2

    Adult safety phase 3

    Immunogenicity

    Summary

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    46/87

    Pediatric Database

    No controlled efficacy trials

    Total Pediatric data base - 121 pts

    Safety PK/PD sepsis study - 83 pts.

    Purpura Fulminans - 14 pts.

    Additional uncontrolledtrials - 24 pts.

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs Adult Phase 3

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    47/87

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3Type of Organ Failure (% of Patients)

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    Cardiovascular Respiratory Hematologic Renal

    Pediatric (N=32) Adult (N=1690)

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs Adult Phase 3

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    48/87

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3

    # of Organ Failures (% of Patients)

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    One Two Three Four

    Pediatric (N=32) Adult (N=1690)

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs Adult Phase 3

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    49/87

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3

    Primary Site of Infection (% of Patients)

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    Blood CNS Lung Intra-Abd UTI

    Pediatric (N=83) Adult (N=1690)

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    50/87

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3

    Type of Pathogen (% of Patients)

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    Gram Positive Gram Negative Mixed Gram

    Pediatric (N=83) Adult (N=1690)

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    51/87

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3

    Predicted Mortality (% of Patients)

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    Pediatric Index of

    Mortality

    APACHE II Score

    Pediatric (N=83) Adult (N=1690)

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    52/87

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3

    Actual Mortality (% of Patients)

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    14 Day Mortality 14 Day Mortality

    Pediatric (N=83) Adult (N=1690)

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    53/87

    Pediatric Sepsis Study vs. Adult Phase 3

    Safety Parameters (% of Patients)

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    Serious

    Bleeding

    Events

    Bleeding

    AE

    SAE AE

    Pediatric (N=83) Adult (N=850)

    P di t i S f t

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    54/87

    Pediatric Safety

    1 death due to intracranial hemorrhage 3 Bleeding SAE

    6y/o nasopharyngeal hemorrhage

    5 month/old with petechial cerebralhemorrhage

    15 y/o with UGI hemorrhage

    P di t i S

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    55/87

    Pediatric Summary

    Limited uncontrolled database Similar

    PK/PD data

    Serious bleeding events Different

    Organ failure - CV

    Primarily one organ failure Site of infection - blood, lung, CNS

    Type of pathogen - gram negative

    10% 14 day mortality

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    56/87

    Outline of Presentation

    Pediatrics

    Adult safety phase 2

    Adult safety phase 3

    Immunogenicity

    Summary

    Safety Phase 2

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    57/87

    Safety Phase 2

    Patient Population

    Exclusion of patients with:

    high risk of bleeding

    on medications affecting coagulation

    Specific criteria to start and stop the

    infusion

    related to procedures related to coagulation parameters

    Safety Phase 2

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    58/87

    Safety Phase 2

    Patient Deaths by TreatmentGroup

    Treatment group 48 hrinfusion

    96 hrinfusion

    12 ug/kg/hr 3/11 (27%) 5/14 (36%)

    18 ug/kg/hr 3/11 (27%) 7/15 (47%)

    24 ug/kg/hr 0/12 (0%) 5/15 (33%)

    30 ug/kg/hr 3/12 (25%) Not Studied

    All Placebo 14/41 (34%)

    S f t Ph 2

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    59/87

    Safety Phase 2

    SAE during infusion period by treatmentgroup

    48 hr rhAPC 7/46 (15%)

    96 hr rhAPC 12/44 (27%) All Placebo 10/41 (24%)

    Bleeding events reported as significant

    3/90 (3%) No intracranial hemorrhages

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    60/87

    Outline of Presentation

    Pediatrics

    Adult safety phase 2

    Adult safety phase 3

    Immunogenicity

    Summary

    Safety Phase 3

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    61/87

    Safety Phase 3Deaths Attributable to Hemorrhage During

    the Infusion Period 850 patients in the rhAPC treatment arm

    2 intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)

    1 pulmonary hemorrhage 1 thoracic hemorrhage

    840 patients in the placebo arm No Deaths attributable to hemorrhage

    Ongoing Open-Label Trials

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    62/87

    Ongoing Open Label Trials

    New Intracranial Hemorrhages

    During the Infusion Period 13 new ICH in 520 patients enrolled in

    ongoing safety studies

    8 of these occurred during the infusion

    period

    Infusion period event rate

    8/520 1.5% 95% CI (.67, 3.01)

    Serious Bleeding Events

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    63/87

    Serious Bleeding Events

    Protocol Definition

    Intracranial hemorrhage

    Life-threatening bleed

    Transfusion of > 2 units (phase 2) or > 3

    units (phase 3) PRBC on 2 consecutive

    days

    Met other criteria for a SAE

    Serious Bleeding Events

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    64/87

    Serious Bleeding Events

    Infusion Period

    Site rhAPC (n=850) Placebo (n=840)

    Total 20 8

    Gastrointestinal 5 4

    Intra-abdominal 2 3Intra-thoracic 4 0

    Retroperitoneal 3 0

    Intracranial hemorrhage 2 0

    Undefined hemorrhage 1 1Genitourinary 2 0

    Skin/soft tissue 1 0

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    65/87

    Safety During the Infusion Period

    2% 1%

    19%

    11% 7% 7%

    69% 65%

    0%10%

    20%

    30%

    40%50%

    60%

    70%

    Serious

    Bleeding

    Event

    Bleeding

    AE

    SAE AE

    rhAPC (N=850) Placebo (N=840)

    First APACHE II Quartile

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    66/87

    First APACHE II QuartileEvents During Drug Infusion

    Event (%)

    rhAPC Placebo Treatment

    differenceBleedingAE

    38/218 (17%) 17/210 (8%) 9%

    Serious

    BleedingEvent

    9/218 (4%) 0 4%

    Subjects Requiring Transfusion

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    67/87

    Subjects Requiring Transfusion

    During 28 Day Study Period

    rhAPCN (%)

    PlaceboN (%)

    PRBC 533/850 (63) 490/840 (58)

    FFP 200/850 (24) 162/840 (19)

    Platelets 114/850 (13) 96/840 (11)

    Serious Bleeding Events in

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    68/87

    Serious Bleeding Events in

    Patients Laboratory Evidence of

    DIC

    rhAPC

    N (%)

    Placebo

    N (%)Subjects in DIC 28/800 (4) 16/774 (2)

    Subjects withunknown DIC 2/49 (4) 1/66 (2)

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    69/87

    Bleeding Events and Baseline

    Coagulation Factors

    Pooled phase 2 and phase 3 data

    rhAPC = 940 Placebo = 881

    Baseline APTT and Adverse

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    70/87

    Baseline APTT and Adverse

    Bleeding Events

    ActivatedPartial

    ThromboplastinTime

    rhAPCN (%)

    PlaceboN (%)

    APTT< 2x ULN 147/825 (18) 80/761 (11)

    APTT> 2x ULN 9/44 (20) 5/37 (14)

    Baseline PT and Adverse

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    71/87

    Baseline PT and Adverse

    Bleeding Events

    ProthrombinTime

    rhAPCN (%)

    PlaceboN (%)

    PT < 1.2x ULN 49/354 (14) 29/311 (9)

    PT > 1.2x ULN 108/516 (21) 55/484 (11)

    Baseline Platelet Count and

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    72/87

    Baseline Platelet Count and

    Adverse Bleeding Events

    Platelet Count rhAPC

    N (%)

    Placebo

    N (%)Platelet > 50,000/mm

    3133/771 (17) 71/709 (10)

    Platelet < 50,000/mm3 5/19 (26) 7/24 (29)

    Serious Bleeding Events in

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    73/87

    Serious Bleeding Events in

    Subjects who Received Heparin(Received DVT prophylactic dose at baseline up to day 5)

    Treatment rhAPCEvents (%)

    PlaceboEvents (%)

    Received

    Heparin

    15/634 (2) 5/637 (1)

    No Heparin 5/216 (2) 3/203 (1)

    Bleeding Adverse Events in

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    74/87

    Bleeding Adverse Events in

    Subjects who Received Heparin(Received DVT prophylactic dose at baseline up to day 5)

    Treatment rhAPCEvents (%)

    PlaceboEvents (%)

    Received

    Heparin

    111/634 (18) 67/637 (11)

    No Heparin 49/216 (23) 24/203 (12)

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    75/87

    Subgroups

    No differences in safety profile were

    observed in the following sub-groups

    Gender

    Origin

    Age

    Baseline Surgical Status

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    76/87

    Baseline Surgical StatusPhase 2 and 3 Data

    Mortality

    Emergency post-op patient with sepsis rhAPC 56/186 (30%) placebo 49/187 (26%)

    Elective post-op patient with sepsis rhAPC 20/63 (32%) placebo 22/59 (37%)

    Bleeding Rate

    Similar bleeding adverse event ratebetween post-op and non operative

    patients

    rhAPC Steady State Concentration

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    77/87

    yand Adverse Events

    (N=326, median 45 ng/ml)

    0%

    5%10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    Mortality >=1 SAE >=1 SAE

    infusion

    BE-SAE BE-SAE

    infusion

    Median and Below 14-45 ng/mlAbove Median 45.1-390 ng/ml

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    78/87

    Outline of Presentation

    Pediatrics

    Adult safety phase 2

    Adult safety phase 3

    Immunogenicity

    Summary

    Immunogenicity

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    79/87

    Immunogenicity

    3 tier testing1 Chemiluminescent Binding Assay (CBA)

    2 Inhibition Chemiluminescent Binding Assay

    3 Neutralizing antibody assay (APTT)

    Assay Evaluation

    Outstanding issues regarding sensitivity,

    specificity and quantificationDifficult to assess true incidence of Anti-APC

    antibodies

    Immunogenicity

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    80/87

    Immunogenicity

    Patients tested: Phase 2 and 3 942 subjects - 370 tested

    5 positive patients by tier 1 test

    (Binding assay)

    2 positive patients by tier 2 tests(Inhibition assay)

    0 positive patient by tier 3 tests(Neutralizing)

    Patients Positive for Specific

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    81/87

    Patients Positive for Specific

    anti-APC Ab(Inhibition Assay)

    Phase 2 Patient no clinical sequalae

    Phase 3 Patient Superficial and deep venous thrombosis

    alive at day 28 study end

    follow-up revealed subject died at day 36 of multi-organ failure

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    82/87

    Outline of Presentation

    Pediatrics

    Adult safety phase 2

    Adult safety phase 3

    Immunogenicity

    Summary

    Pediatric Summary

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    83/87

    Pediatric Summary

    No controlled studies to support efficacy

    Limited patient population

    Compared to adults similar drug effects

    different disease characteristics

    low mortality rate/similar adverse event rate

    Summary of Safety - Adults

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    84/87

    Summary of Safety Adults

    Subjects enrolled in the phase 2 and 3trials were carefully selected to minimize

    bleeding risk

    Increased rate during infusion in rhAPCtreated subjects compared to placebo of:

    bleeding adverse events

    19% vs.11% respectively serious bleeding events

    2% vs. 1% respectively

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    85/87

    Summary of Safety - Adults

    Phase 3 trial

    4 deaths attributed to bleeding during infusion

    of rhAPC (2 ICH) - none in placebo rate of ICH during infusion of rhAPC - 0.2%

    Subsequent open label trials (N=520)

    13 new intracranial hemorrhages 8 during the infusion period

    Rate of ICH during infusion (8/520) - 1.5%

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    86/87

    Summary of Safety - Adults

    One subject with anti-APC Ab

    developed DVT

    No other pattern of adverse eventsnoted comparing rhAPC to placebo

  • 8/13/2019 3797s1_02_Forsyth

    87/87

    Safety Conclusion

    Difficult disease process to detect

    adverse events

    Trend in intracranial hemorrhage True risk uncertain