+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

3Plastic AnalysisPlates

Date post: 03-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: jym-genson
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 13

Transcript
  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    1/13

    Large deflection elastic-plastic

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    1

  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    2/13

    e ne concep

    for plates

    Plate strips

    Plastic hinge concept extended to 2 dimensions

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    2

    ,

  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    3/13

    Rigid-plastic resistance for platesAxially fixed or free boundaries

    60]

    qz z

    1

    3 212

    2 ( )

    4

    5

    pacity

    [q/

    5

    3

    q

    qz

    zz

    Pinned ends

    c

    c

    2 1

    2

    3

    1

    31 1

    2

    ( )( )

    :

    2

    3

    carrying

    c

    1z

    w

    hq

    h

    a

    Clampd ends

    cY 2

    6 2

    2 2

    :

    0

    0 1 2 3Load-

    zw

    hq

    h

    ac

    Y 12 2

    2 2

    a a a

    3 2( )

    Unlike beams no simple solution exists for plates with finite

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    3

  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    4/13

    Rigid-plastic resistance for platesAxially fixed or free boundaries

    0]

    4

    5

    pacity[

    q/q a =

    5

    3 6

    78

    capaci

    ty

    strip]

    1 = a/b

    3, 2

    2

    3

    arr

    ying

    ca 2

    1

    23

    4

    5

    -carrying

    [q/q

    c

    plat

    ,

    0

    0 1 2 3Load-

    0

    1

    0 1 2 3

    Loa

    The membrane effect is relatively larger for long plate

    Relative displacement [w/h]

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    4

  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    5/13

    Plastic analysis- comparison with NLFEA

    14

    16

    8

    10

    adfactor

    2

    4

    6L

    Fixed-060 plast 0.6Fixed-090 plast 0.9

    Fixed-120 plast 1.2Fixed-150 plast 1.5

    0

    0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04Deformation [m]

    Fixed-180 plast 1.8

    Nonlinear FE predictions and plastic analysis of uniformly loadedrectangular plates with various aspect ratios

    (600/900/1200/1500/1800 x 600 x 35 mm,fY= 300 MPa). Rotationally

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    5

  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    6/13

    Influence of boundary conditions

    16

    18

    20

    10

    12

    14

    oadfactor

    2

    4

    6 Fixed-060 Straight060

    Fixed-090 Straight-090

    Fixed-120 Straight-120Fixed-150 Straight-150

    0

    0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06

    Deformation

    Fixed-180 Straight-180

    (600/900/1200/1500/1800 600 x 35 mm,fY= 300 MPa for

    (1): rotationally clamped and axially fixed boundaries

    (2): rotationally clamped and axially free, but straight boundaries.

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    6

    oa actor x a .

  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    7/13

    Non-linear finite element simulation of latessubjected uniform patch loading

    Membrane effect

    .

    Load

    patch

    Load

    patch

    Same load patch different plate length

    Boundaries fixed or straight

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    7

  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    8/13

    16

    Plate boundary

    8

    12

    factor Resistance

    converges

    4

    Loa

    patch-0.60

    patch-0.90-

    as o a o

    uniformly

    loaded plate

    Load patch L

    0

    0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04

    .

    s

    Nonlinear FE predictions of resistance versus deformation of rectangularplates subjected to uniform patch loading with various width b = 600/900 and1500 mm (plate dimensions 1800 x 600 x 35 mm,fY= 300 MPa).Rotationall clam ed and axiall fixed boundaries. Load factor x 1 MPa

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    8

  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    9/13

    Constant load patch plate aspect ratio factor

    Resistance for b = 0.60, s = 0.60 m, t = 35 mm,

    IACS resistance

    independent of

    Plate boundary fy= 300 MPa20

    aspect ratio

    No gain in reducing

    Lb10

    ure

    [MPa]

    DNV aspect ratio

    factor reasonable

    Load patch

    5

    Pres

    L/b=1.0 DnV-fact

    L/b=1.5 DnV-fact

    L/b=2.0 DnV-fact

    0

    0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050

    Deformation [m]

    . -

    IACS

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    9

  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    10/13

    Constant load patch plate aspect ratio factor

    IACS resistance

    independent ofaspect ratio

    a e oun ary Resistance for b = 0.90, s = 0.60 m, t = 35 mm,

    fy= 300 MPa15

    No gain in

    reducing girder

    spacingLb

    10

    sure

    [MPa]

    DNV aspect ratio

    factor less

    reasonable for

    Load patch 5Pres

    L/b=1.0 DnV-fact

    L/b=4/3 DnV-fact

    L/b=2.0 DnV-fact

    IACS

    long patchs 0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050Deformation [m]

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    10

  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    11/13

    Local plate resistance

    Resistance increases with increasing

    e orma ons ue o e mem rane

    effect Can we allow permanent deformations

    and how much is acce table?

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    11

  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    12/13

    Equivalent strain vs. load patch

    Plate boundary

    0.20

    0.25Patch-0.60

    Patch-0.90

    Load patch L 0.10

    0.15

    Str

    ainN

    Patch-1.20

    Staright edge 0.60

    0.05

    s

    .

    0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080

    Deformation [m]

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    12

    qu va ent stra n v rtua y n epen ent o oa patc

  • 8/12/2019 3Plastic AnalysisPlates

    13/13

    Local plate resistanceResistance for L=1.80 m, s = 0.60 m, t = 35 mm,

    fy= 300 MPa

    versus max. equivalent strain

    1214

    or

    Plate boundary q. s ra n . .

    6

    8

    Loadfac

    - -Load patch L

    0

    2

    . .

    patch-0.90 IACS0.90 DnV-fact'

    patch-1.50 IACS1.50 DnV-fact

    . . . . .

    Deformation [m]s

    Potential for reduced plate thickness if permanent

    NUS July 10-12, 2006 Analysis and Design for Robustness of Offshore StructuresNUS Keppel Short Course

    13

    deformations are allowed