+ All Categories
Home > Documents > - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems...

- Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems...

Date post: 10-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: phamkhue
View: 217 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
31
Page 1 Jan 5, 2000 <3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> <Avneesh Agrawal, Qualcomm>
Transcript
Page 1: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 1Jan 5, 2000

<3rd generation CDMA wireless systems>

<Avneesh Agrawal, Qualcomm>

Page 2: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 2Jan 5, 2000

Overview• What is 3G ?

• A brief overview of IS95

• Key design choices for CDMA 3G systems.– Bandwidth

– Modulation

– Coding

– Power Control

– Transmit Diversity

– Base Station Synchronization.

– Acquisition

– Beam Forming

– Multi-user detection

– Peak To Average Power

• Objective is not to provide detailed justifications, but instead providesome insight into the level of optimization that went into designing thephysical layer of the next generation wireless systems.

Page 3: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 3Jan 5, 2000

What is 3G ?

• A loosely defined term referring to next generation wireless systems.– Analog was 1G. GSM/IS95 were 2G. Next is 3G.

• Used interchangeably with IMT2000 although there are some specificIMT2000 guidelines defined by the ITU.

• Envisioned as a single Global standard allowing seamless roamingacross the world.

– Market is expected to be fragmented amongst several competingstandards.

– Mostly dominated by Direct Sequence CDMA.

– Marketed as Global 3G CDMA implying a single unified standard. In reality,Global 3G comprises of 3 modes :

» Multi-carrier CDMA FDD

» Direct Spread CDMA FDD

» Direct Spread CDMA TDD

– There are others : IS95 HDR, EDGE, etc.

Page 4: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 4Jan 5, 2000

80 81 95 99 00 0201 03 04

Indicative timeline ofcommercial launch

92

IS-41

The Big Picture

AMPS

GSMHCSD

GPRS

EDGE IIEDGE

CDMA-95

CDMA-DSFDD

CDMA-MC1x

CDMA-MC3x

CDMA-TDD

CDMA-95B

GSM-MAP

IP

IS95 HDR

Page 5: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 5Jan 5, 2000

IS95 Forward Link (BS to mobile)

Walsh 0

Pilot Channel(all 0's)

User m ForwardTraffic Channel

Rate Set 1

Walsh m

Mux

Add CRCAdd 8 tail bits

Conv CodeRate 1/2

K = 9

SymbolRepetition

BlockInterleaver

Long CodeGenerator

Decimator Decimator

42 bit Long Code

1.2288 Mcps

19.2 ksps 800 Hz

8.6 kbps4.0 kbps2.0 kbps0.8 kbps

9.6 kbps4.8 kbps2.4 kbps1.2 kbps

19.2 ksps9.6 ksps4.8 ksps2.4 ksps

19.2 ksps

Power ControlBits

800 bps

Walsh j

Mux

Add CRCAdd 8 tail bits

Conv CodeRate 1/2

K = 9

SymbolRepetition

and Puncture

BlockInterleaver

Long CodeGenerator

Decimator Decimator

42 bit Long Code

1.2288 Mcps

19.2 ksps 800 Hz

13.35 kbps6.25 kbps2.75 kbps1.05 kbps

14.4 kbps7.2 kbps3.6 kbps1.8 kbps

28.8 ksps14.4 ksps7.2 ksps3.6 ksps

19.2 ksps

Power ControlBits

800 bps

User j ForwardTraffic Channel

Rate Set 2

A

A

A

Sync ChannelPaging Channel (x n)

Other users traffic channel

A

Page 6: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 6Jan 5, 2000

IS95 Forward Link (contd.)

A s(t)Σ

BasebandFilter X

Baseband Filter X

I-channel PN sequence1.2288 Mcps

Q-channel PN sequence1.2288 Mcps

cos (2π f t)

sin (2π f t)

Page 7: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 7Jan 5, 2000

IS95 Reverse Link (Mobile to Base Station)

Add CRCAdd 8 tail bits

Conv Code

Rate 1/3K = 9

ORRate 1/2

K=9

SymbolRepetition

BlockInterleaver

8.6 kbps4.0 kbps2.0 kbps0.8 kbps

9.6 kbps4.8 kbps2.4 kbps1.2 kbps

28.8 ksps14.4 ksps7.2 ksps3.6 ksps

28.8 ksps

14.4 kbps7.2 kbps3.6 kbps1.8 kbps

13.35 kbps6.25 kbps2.75 kbps1.05 kbps

64-aryOrthogonalModulator

Data BurstRandomizer

Long CodeGenerator

B

1.2288 Mcps

1.2288 Mcps

Page 8: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 8Jan 5, 2000

IS95 Reverse Link (contd.)

s(t)B

BasebandFilter X

I-channel PN sequence1.2288 Mcps

Q-channel PN sequence1.2288 Mcps

cos (2π f t)

Baseband Filter X

Σ

sin (2π f t)

D

1/2 PN ChipDelay = 406.9 ns

Page 9: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 9Jan 5, 2000

3G CDMA

Page 10: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 10Jan 5, 2000

3G Standards

• Focus on 2 systems– WCDMA FDD and CDMA2000

– Expected to be the dominant 3G standards, although IS95 HDR is gainingpopularity.

– HDR is a data only system.

• WCDMA (CDMA-Direct Sequence)– Strongly pushed by ETSI (Europe) and ARIB (Japan)

– CDMA Air interface (3.84 Mcps), GSM protocol stack.

– NTT DoCoMo (under pressure from IS95 deployment by DDI/IDO in Japan)is targeting initial deployment in Fall, 2001.

• CDMA2000 (CDMA - Multicarrier)– An evolution over IS95

– Two versions : 1x (1.2288 MHz) and 3x ( 3 carriers at 1.2288 MHz each)

• There seems to be little debate on which system has higher capacity(as technically, the two systems are very similar)

• Success depends largely on cost, time to market and political factors.

• Focus of this talk is on Physical Layer

Page 11: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 11Jan 5, 2000

WCDMA Forward Link

S/P C ch ,1DPDCH1/DPCCH

S/P C ch ,2DPDCH2

S/P C ch ,NDPDCHN

Σ

Σ

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

*j

I+jQ

I

Q

Cscra mb

OVSF Codes = BitReverse(Walsh Codes)

Root Raised CosineFilter (roll-off = .22)

I

Q

1

1 0

02

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

6

6

7

7

8

8

9

9

17

17

16

16

15

15

14

14

13

13

12

12

11

11

10

10

Gold CodePN sequence

Page 12: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 12Jan 5, 2000

WCDMA Forward Link

Tx.Antenna 2

MUX

Data

Tx.Antenna 1

Channelization code andlong scrambling code C ,spreading length = M

Ant1

Ant2

Ant1

Ant2

TPC

TFI

Pilot

MUX

ChannelEncoder

Interleaver

STTDEncoder

RateMatching

QPSK symbols

Diversity Pilot

One radio frame, Tf = 10 ms

TPC NTPC bits

Slot #0 Slot #1 Slot #i Slot #14

Tslot = 2560 chips, 10*2k bits (k=0..7)

Data2Ndata2 bits

DPDCH

TFCI NTFCI bits

Pilot Npilot bits

Data1Ndata1 bits

DPDCH DPCCH DPCCH

Page 13: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 13Jan 5, 2000

WCDMA Reverse Link

Pilot Npilot bits

TPC NTPC bits

DataNdata bits

Slot #0 Slot #1 Slot #i Slot #14

Tslot = 2560 chips, 10*2k bits (k=0..6)

1 radio frame: Tf = 10 ms

DPDCH

DPCCHFBI

NFBI bitsTFCI

NTFCI bits

Σ

Cch,1

DPDCH1

βd

Cch,3

DPDCH3

βd

Cch,d5

DPDCH5

βd

Channelization codes gain factors

Σ

Cch,2

DPDCH2

βd

Cch,4

DPDCH4

βd

Cch,6

DPDCH6

βd

Cch,0

DPCCH

*j

Cscramb

I+jQ

βc

I

Q

Page 14: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 14Jan 5, 2000

Bandwidth

• Both systems support wider bandwidth.

• Biggest advantage is ability to support higher peak rates.– Although HDR supports the same peak rates in a 1.25 MHz channel.

• Other advantages (increased frequency diversity, better interferencestatistics, etc.) have not been properly quantified.

• The disadvantage is increased design complexity

• WCDMA has a bandwidth of 3.84 Mcps. Big PR effort against IS95 :Wideband vs Narrowband CDMA.

• CDMA2000 1x is the same as IS95. 3x MultiCarrier is 3.6864 Mcps.

• Both WCDMA and CDMA2000 3x MC support data rates around 2Mbps.

– Only a single user (in good channel conditions) / sector can be supported atthese rates, i.e. high rate service is not going to be cheap !

Page 15: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 15Jan 5, 2000

Modulation

• Reverse Link– IS95 used 64-ary orthogonal modulation

» This allowed non-coherent demod at the receiver. Coherent demodulation atreceiver was considered risky.

» Peak data rate (I.e. 14.4 kbps) was much lower than the signal bandwidth (1.2288Mcps).

» Assumed a conventional receiver (I.e single user CDMA receiver) at the basestation. This implies that primary objective is to reduce transmit power at themobile.

» So, with this system, objective is to use the best (given the constraints ofimplementation complexity) rate 1/p code, where p = processing gain.

» IS95 used a convolutional code (rate 1/2 or 1/3) followed by a (6,64) orthogonalblock code, followed by a repetition code.

Page 16: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 16Jan 5, 2000

Modulation

• Forward Link– IS95 used BPSK because

» More tolerant to phase errors. Performance in fast fading channels was aconcern.

» General view was that IS95 was interference limited and hence more efficientmodulation was not necessary.

• Clearly, increased bandwidth would have allowed more powerful lower ratecodes, and hence could have increased capacity.

• In benign channel conditions (e.g. wireless local loop), the number ofavailable walsh channels was limiting forward link capacity.

Page 17: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 17Jan 5, 2000

Modulation

• 3G– WCDMA, CDMA2000 : both are going for QPSK modulation (on both links)

with pilot for phase reference.» Increased capacity, lower rate codes.

» Coherent demodulation not perceived as a problem. In fact, the overhead of piloton the up link more than compensated by improvements in synchronization andpower control.

» Supporting higher data rates. Hence, there is insufficient processing gain for 64-ary orthogonal modulation.

– HDR is using adaptive modulation (upto 16 QAM) and adaptive processinggain to improve capacity.

Page 18: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 18Jan 5, 2000

Coding

• IS95– Convolutional codes only.

– Rate 1/2 or 1/3 on uplink, K = 9.

– Rate 1/2 or 3/4 on downlink. The rate 3/4 code is used for the highest datarate (14.4 kbps), and is not a good code …

• 3G– Same conv codes for CDMA2000, WCDMA and HDR, except that the rate

3/4 code has been removed and a rate 1/3 code on the downlink has beenintroduced.

– Turbo Codes for data.» CDMA2000 and WCDMA use the same parallel Concatenated Codes. K = 4, rate

1/3. The turbo interleavers are different

» HDR : Serial Concatenated codes. K = 5, rate 1/2 outer code followed by K = 3,rate 1/2 inner code

Page 19: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 19Jan 5, 2000

Power Control

• IS95– Fast Reverse Link Power Control at 800 Hz

– Very slow Forward Power Control» IS95 A forward power control was a few Hz.

» IS95 B increased it to 50 Hz

– Slow Forward Power Control big limitation.

– In order to guarantee voice quality, base station has to put a floor onminimum transmit power.

– Generally, the forward link is the capacity limiting link.

• 3G– CDMA2000 uses 800 Hz for both uplink and downlink.

– WCDMA uses 1500 Hz for both links.

– Improved forward power control has a significant improvement on systemcapacity.

– HDR uses rate control instead of power control.

Page 20: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 20Jan 5, 2000

Transmit Diversity

• No transmit diversity for IS95

• CDMA2000 uses 2 forms:– OTD : Orthogonal Transmit Diversity.

» Transmit consecutive symbols on adjacent antennas using orthogonal codes.

– STS : Space Time Spreading» Ant 1 : S1 x W1(t) - S2* x W2(t)

» Ant 2 : S1* x W2(t) + S2 x W1(t)

» W1(t), W2(t) are orthogonal sequences.

• WCDMA supports several forms of Transmit Diversity– STTD : Space Time Transmit Diversity

» Ant 1 : transmit S1 S2 , S1 & S2 are complex symbols

» Ant 2 : transmit -S2* S1*

» For STS & STTD, performance equivalent to two antenna receive diversity in flatfading environment.

Page 21: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 21Jan 5, 2000

Transmit Diversity

– Feedback Mode Transmit Diversity» WCDMA provides fast feedback (upto 1500 Hz) mode transmit diversity.

» Allows receiver to control the amplitude and phase of the two antennas.

– Time Switched Transmit Diversity» Signal is transmitted alternately from two antennas using predetermined pattern.

S1 S2STTD encoder

S1 S2

-S2* S1

*

T 2T0 T 2T

Ant 1

Ant 2

MobileAntenna

Path 1

Path j

Ndata

STTD

Page 22: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 22Jan 5, 2000

Base Station Synchronization

• CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor of 1, andhence do not require any frequency planning.

• However, they do need to do code planning in order to ensure that theydo not allocate the same PN codes to adjacent base stations.

• In IS95 and CDMA2000, different base stations use a different offset ofthe same PN sequence.

– Base stations are synchronized using GPS. Hence, having different offsetsensures that the PN sequences from different base stations will not coincidewith one another. The offsets are at a minimum of 256 chips apart.

• WCDMA does not require synchronization.– Mostly a political issue as some governments do not want to have their

communications infrastructure rely on a US defense program.

– Once again, this was a big PR effort against IS95 & CDMA2000.

– Most of the initial deployments are expected to be in synchronous mode.

Page 23: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 23Jan 5, 2000

Base Station Synchronization

• Async. Systems cannot use offsets of the same PN sequence fordifferent base stations and hence we need an efficient way to generatemultiple PN sequences.

• WCDMA uses Gold codes for PN sequences. Gold codes areconstructed as linear combinations (in GF(2) ) of two m-sequences.

– Cyclic shifts of one sequence with respect to another create different codes.

– IS95 & CDMA2000 use an m-sequence (I.e. maximal length LFSR) forgenerating the PN sequence.

• Asynchronous base stations have some problems :– Initial Acquisition

» Instead of searching for a single PN sequence, with async. Systems, the mobilehas to search for multiple PN sequences.

– Handoff searching.» Every handoff search is like initial acquisition.

» In contrast, for sync. Systems, handoff searching is simpler. E.g. for IS95, theinitial acquisition window size is 215 chips. For handoff searching, the uncertaintyis much less (= max delay spread)

Page 24: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 24Jan 5, 2000

Acquisition

• Fast acquisition is very important for a mobile user in a multi-cellularenvironment.

– Even more important for CDMA systems where minimizing transmit powerto close the link is a key determinant of system capacity.

– So, phone should always try to lock onto the strongest pilot.

• CDMA2000 uses a continuous pilot like IS95.

• WCDMA uses a 3 step hierarchical search process to reduceacquisition time.

Page 25: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 25Jan 5, 2000

WCDMA Searching

• Total of 512 Gold Codes divided into 64 groups of 8 codes each.

• In addition, there are 2 Synchronization sequences, SCH1 and SCH2.

• SCH1 is a 256 chip PN code common to all base stations. Repeatsevery slot (1 slot = 2560 chips)

• SCH2 can be one 16 different sequences. Code length is 256 chipsand it is time aligned with SCH1. Sequence length is 15 slots (10 ms).

– Sequence is sub-set of a Reed Solomon Code.

– Comma Free Property. That means, no cyclic shift of a code is a valid code.

– So, receiver can unambiguously determine start of 15 slot sequence.

– 64 different sequences, each representing one code group

• Step 1 : Use 256 chip match filter to determine modulo ‘slot’ (I.e. 2560chips) timing.

• Step 2 : Identify code group and derive frame timing (10 ms timing)

• Step 3 : Exhaustive search against 8 possible codes in a code group.

Page 26: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 26Jan 5, 2000

WCDMA Synchronization Channel

PrimarySCH

SecondarySCH

256 chips

2560 chips

One 10 ms SCH radio frame

acsi,0

acp

acsi,1

acp

acsi,14

acp

Slot #0 Slot #1 Slot #14

Page 27: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 27Jan 5, 2000

Beam Forming

• IS95 only supports fixed sectorization.

• Beam Forming is considered important for 3G systems.

• All 3G systems (that I am aware of) support beam forming.

• Requirement is simple : Each channel with beam forming should havea dedicated pilot for phase reference.

• None of the systems provide a mechanism for the phone to provide theCSI (Channel State Information) to the transmitter (with the exceptionof Feedback Mode Transmit Diversity in WCDMA).

– Beam form on remote scatterers

– Have fixed spot beams for high capacity areas.

Page 28: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 28Jan 5, 2000

Multi-User Detection

• Does not seem to be much interest in multi-user detectors.

• A year ago, NTT was a big proponent of multi-user receivers, but latelythere has been little development on that front.

• Biggest problem is designing multi-user receivers with reasonablecomplexity for a multi-cellular environment.

• WCDMA standard supports short spreading codes (256 chips asopposed to the regular 38400 chips) to aid in multi-user detection.

– With long codes, the correlation matrix of the codes changes every symbol.

• Schemes such as interference cancellation do not require standardssupport.

• In IS95 the downlink was the capacity limiting link. With WCDMA &CDMA2000, the downlink capacity has been improved, but withasymmetric data rates, downlink may still be the capacity limiting link.

– Having multi-user receivers on the base station would have little impact oncapacity.

Page 29: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 29Jan 5, 2000

Peak To Average Power

• IS95 uses 2 schemes to reduce Peak To Average Power– Offset QPSK modulation to reduce Peak to Average.

– Constant power transmission. For lower data rates, transmission isdiscontinued for some duration. The Peak to average remains the same;however, peak to average when the Power Amplifier is on is reduced.

• 3G– HPSK (Hybrid Phase Shift Keying)

» c = c1 (w0 + j c2*w1)

» c1 = PN sequence changing at chip rate.

» c2 = PN sequence changing at half the chip rate.

» W0 = { 1 1}; W1 = {1 -1}

» phase transitions less than 90 degrees half the time.

– Continuous transmission => worse peak to average» Compensated by improved power control, time diversity and receiver

synchronization.

Page 30: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 30Jan 5, 2000

SummaryForward Link Capacity Improvements

• Fast Forward Power Control

• More spectrally efficient modulation

• Turbo codes and lower rate convolutional codes.

• Transmit diversity

• Dedicated pilots for support of beam forming.

• Support higher peak data rates.

• Protocol improvements to improve packet data transmission.

Page 31: - Stanford …3rd generation CDMA wireless systems> ... – Power Control ... • CDMA systems generally have a frequency reuse factor

Page 31Jan 5, 2000

SummaryReverse Link Capacity Improvements

• Coherent Reverse Link

• Improved synchronization and power control because of Reverse LinkPilot.

• Improved time diversity and power control because of continuoustransmission.

• QPSK modulation

• Turbo codes

• Multi-user detection

• Faster Power Control (for WCDMA)

• Improved Access Channel– Reservation based schemes as opposed to slotted Aloha in IS95


Recommended