+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Date post: 16-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: nc-state-university
View: 456 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
26
CLASS 5: Andrews LEA Approach, Grammar In Context, & Inquiry Continued FALL 2010 – Dr. Young ECI 430: Methods & Materials for Teaching English Language Arts in the Middle Grades
Transcript
Page 1: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

CLASS 5: Andrews LEA Approach, Grammar In Context, & Inquiry ContinuedFALL 2010 – Dr. Young

ECI 430: Methods & Materials for Teaching English Language Arts in the Middle Grades

Page 2: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

What does he mean?

"Intention unlocks tacit powers."

-- James Britton

tacit ?

def.: implied, not explicit but understood

Page 3: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

First-Person Mini-Inquiry

Origins of your names… First and last…◦What did you find?◦Where did you find it?

Page 4: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

LANGUAGE BY PROXY WWW.WORDLE.NET

Page 5: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

For our purposes, we will expand the notion of language study to include awareness and exploration of…

morphology – ◦study of words (parts, sounds, origins, etc.)

syntax – ◦study of sentence structure (of which traditional

grammar is only one small part)semantics –

◦ study of forming patterns, making connections, and creating meaning

Intended Outcomes: To increase students’reflective or metalinguistic awareness and overall ability with the totality of language. To increase the syntactic complexity of students’ writing.

Page 6: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

CHARACTERISTICS OF ANDREWS’ LEA APPROACH:

1. The study of genuine authentic language instead of abstract & contrived textbook examples and models.

2. An insistence on premise that language learning activities in schools must be student-centered rather than teacher-centered.

3. A requirement that students make observations of authentic language, then formulate generalizations based on those observations.

4. A recognition of the linguistic fact that good English is a rigorously enforced but floating social standard that is attained through varying uses of language depending on their diverse contexts of use. A social tax is assessed against those who violate the expectations and requirements for Good English, standards that are embedded in every communication event.

5. A basis in the proposition that as students’ language continues to develop, their growth in language also helps them to grow through language.

Page 7: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Origins of English Language

Robert Lowth and the Enlightenment Tradition◦ A Short Introduction to English Grammar (1762): prescriptive, evaluative,

critical of Shakespeare, Milton, Donne, etc. Self-appointed experts and “mavens”

◦ Rather than consensusBased on Greek and Latin Models

◦ Including multiple, sometimes conflicting grammars; not of its own originAssumption English was a decayed form of classical

languages ◦ Not the standard at that time—irony of it being considered decayed form!

No acknowledgement of language development and change over time ◦ Instead, language was steeped in hierarchical control and characterized by

prescriptive rules and fixed notions

NOTE: On next slide, Language Tree Frontpiece Image Source: Webster, Noah. (1969). Webster’s New Twentieth Century Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged. New York: World Publishing Company.

Page 8: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Origins of English Language (continued)

Page 9: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Language Exploration & Awareness: The Criteria

LEA activities emphasize meaning.LEA activities use authentic language

found in genuine social circumstances.LEA activities provide for a developmental

view.LEA activities develop awareness of

several aspects of language.LEA activities are student centered and

inquiry oriented.LEA activities require reflection.

Page 10: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

3 Prerequisites for the LEA Approach:

1. Language study should focus on genuine and authentic uses of language; ◦ (rather than decontextualized, disconnected

examples)2. Language success (“correctness”) is

determined by the application of multiple criteria of effectiveness; ◦ (rather than just one)

3. There should be more opportunities in classrooms for student talk. ◦ (rather than just the teacher)

Page 11: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Andrews’ Lea Model:The best way for people to learn about language is for them to…

observe languageask questions about how and why

language forms are used as they are in various contexts

make closer and more focused observations

form tentative hypotheses

Page 12: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

A balanced language curriculum will include numerous opportunities to explore:

the many reasons why we use languagewhere language comes fromhow it changes and varies according to

CONTEXT…- who is using it- their purpose- their audience- the setting

and, the ways of assessing language effectiveness in these changing contexts

Page 13: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Neil Postman’s 4 Elements of a

SEMANTIC ENVIRONMENT(Andrews, p. 56)

1. People (their formal and informal relationships).

2. Their purposes (to convince, describe, apologize, please, flatter, obscure, etc.)

3. The general discourse rules through which the conversation operates.

4. The particular talk being used (intimate, informal, or formal).

Page 14: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Examples of 3 Different Semantic Environments a batter’s box \   \

\a witness box, and > Each of these has its own / definite purposes and rules

/ that are implicitly understooda confessional box / by its respective

participants.

Breaking the rules in a given environment results in a semantic disruption.

Page 15: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Semantic Disruption (humorous example; they’re not always humorous)

Page 16: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Andrews’ 3 Essential Long-Term Goals for Language Learning (pp. 62-63):

Spontaneity – one’s ability to speak freely and with confidence so that the speaker allocates more attention to what is being said, the message being shared (opposite: reluctant)

Precision – using a more expanded repertoire of words to speak more directly and cogently to accomplish purposes (opposite: vagueness)

Elaboration – ability to use more complex language structures, weaving phrases that provide support, subordination, clarification, and greater specificity into the natural fabric of a sentence or series of sentences; demonstrates ability to combine and coordinate several ideas and propositions in a coherent and cohesive manner and draws upon own knowledge about the larger frames of discourse effectively (opposite: fragmentation)

Page 17: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

What is “Good English?”

Page 18: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

“Good English” is… marked by success in making language choices so that

the fewest number of persons will be distracted by the choices;

appropriate for the speaker’s/writer’s purpose;appropriate for the context;comfortable to both speaker and listener/audience;appropriate for the format/genre used.

Ignoring any of these results in the speaker / writer being judged and having to pay a “social tax” which can range in severity from being embarrassed to being thought of as insensitive to being thought of as uneducated. Also referred to as a “sin tax” – a play on… syntax!

Page 19: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Ways to Narrow the Focusof Grammar Instruction

NC Course of Study for ML ELA: Grade Level Language Standards

Local Curriculum Requirements/Standards

Weaver’s Minimum Approach for Maximum Benefits

Status-Marking ErrorsMost Frequently Occurring ErrorsAddress needs of your students!

Page 20: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach
Page 21: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Weaver’s Minimal Approach for Maximum Benefits (continued)

Page 22: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Weaver’s Minimal Approach for Maximum Benefits (continued)

Page 23: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Status-Marking Errors (Hairston)

Page 24: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Weaver’s 4 Examples of Ways to Teach Grammar in Context

Incidental Lessons – mentioning grammatical terms and connections incidentally or casually in the course of discussing literature and student writing [i.e., way we will discuss terms and patterns in some of the model poems and student poems in class]

Inductive Lessons - guiding students to notice grammatical patterns and connections themselves in literature and student writing [i.e., when we not only read but discuss some of the stylistic and grammatical patterns in literature we read with students]

Conferencing with Students – conferencing one-on-one with students provides an opportunity for the teacher to focus on a particular student’s individual needs in terms of language growth and grammar ability [Lisa Delpit found this to be the second most important feature of writing instruction for African-American students.]

Writing Mini-lessons and Extended Mini-lessons – means of presenting new and useful information to students which may involve opportunities for them to trying out or applying the concept as a means of promoting greater understanding [Delpit found this to be the most important feature of writing workshop for African-American students!]

Page 25: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

Mission Possible Presentations

Mini-Inquiry on Inquiry-Based Learning Strategies◦ Your Secret Dossier: Team Work Presentations◦ MSL Methods Wiki Inquiry Activity◦ Remember!

Turn your dossier in afterwards!

Page 26: 430-F10 Class 5: Andrews LEA Approach

See you next time!


Recommended