Date post: | 12-Apr-2017 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | chandler-shipley |
View: | 474 times |
Download: | 5 times |
Lay’sSofia Shoffner,
Wei Dai,Mariana Aristizabal,
Chandler Shipley
Nature of CompetitionClass: Food
Category: SnackType: Chips
Target MarketAge group: 18-25
Main CompetitorsDoritosTostitos
2
Positioning
*Attribute → Benefit
Perceptual Map
3
Trendy Classic(3,3)
Variety of Flavors
(4.4,4.4)(1.4,4.3)
(4.1,2.5)
6
6
0
0
4
Mental Maps
Brand Mantra
5
Emotional Descriptive Function
Classic: Lay’s has been perfecting its potato chips for more than 75 years and is perceived as very traditional. Its products and brand image have remained mostly unchanged throughout the years so their customers know to expect practiced quality.
Social: Lay’s are consumed mostly at social gatherings. Their most common purchase situations include parties, BBQ’s, and sports viewing events.
Snack: As opposed to a meal, Lay’s are meant to be eaten in between meals, for those times when you want something light, something that keeps your hunger at bay, something to be munched on, something to be shared among family, friends, and guests
6
Product: Creates Value
Price: Captures Value
7
$2.607.75 oz
$3.0210.5 oz
$3.1513.75 oz
Price
Value
Economy Pricing Strategy
Ideal for Lay's target market of 18-24 year olds - a market comprised primarily of students and young, entry level professionals who want
inexpensive snack food.
Placement: Carries Value
8
Pull Strategies
- Event marketing: Lay’s Summer Events 2015 (Cyprus)
- Coupons
Push Strategies
- Merchandising- Quantity discounts
- Stocking support for retailers
Indirect Channels:
- Wholesale retailers: Costco, Sam’s Club- Discounters: Wal-
Mart, Target- Retailers: grocery stores, convenience stores, gas stations, delis, office supply
stores- E-retailers: Amazon,
Google Express- Vending machines
- Schools
Manufacturer/ Distributor:
Frito-Lay
Direct Channels:
Shop online at fritolay.com/snacks/buy-online.html
Promotion: Communicates Value
Flavor Contests
9
Print AdsTV Commercials
2012-2015
2016
Product Placement
The Hangover
Brand Element: Logo
10
Analysis Score
Meaningful 100% of respondents were able to tell that this logo belonged to a chip company 9
Memorable Facilitates recognition and recall, all respondents knew the logo and 72% said it was recognizable as a chip brand
10
Appealing Increased burden on IMC because only 28% of respondents found it inviting and only 35% of respondents perceived it as happy
4
Transferable Very transferable. Logo is used in many circumstances and is kept constant globally 8
Adaptable It is adaptable. Has changed seamlessly through time with major and minor stylistic changes; periods of different logos = 1965–1986, 1986–1996, 1996-2003, 2003-2007
8
Protectable It is trademarked so it is protectable. 8
Brand Element: PackagingAnalysis Score
Meaningful -53% of respondents perceived the packaging as pertaining to a food that is “easy to eat” therefore establishing its membership in the “snack food” category-Further establishes category membership through metalized plastic bag material → snack food-Establishes membership type through images and descriptions of chips on face of package
10
Memorable - Facilitates recognition, Logo is printed largely on front of packaging and packaging is consistent across variety of flavors- Yellow color of Classic bag is especially easy to recall and recognize
8
Appealing - 25% of respondents said that the packaging was inviting- 21% of respondents said that the packaging was fun- 25% of respondents said that the packaging was happy
4
Transferable Material and design is transferable across the world and across flavor varieties 8
Adaptable As product changes and evolves, packaging is able to adapt (through major or minor changes)
8
Protectable Not protectable, is similar to many other chip packages 2
11
Brand Element: Do Us a Flavor ContestAnalysis Score
Meaningful Yes, contest highlights one of Lay’s largest (wide variety of flavors) 9
Memorable Not a lot of consumers associated Lay’s with variety of flavor - therefore as of now, this contest does not facilitate recall or recognition
4
Appealing Reduces burden on IMC, interesting, fun, rich in visual and engaging therefore it 10
Transferable Transferable because Lay’s can implement contest internationally 9
Adaptable - Contest will naturally adapt to changes in consumer flavor preferences over time; consumers come up with flavors that they want to see - Contest main idea and rules are also adaptable in order to maintain consumer excitement and avoid boredom - in 2016, Lay’s evolved it to become the “Flavor Swap” contest
7
Protectable Contest slogan is protectable but the contest idea is easy to replicate by other brands
5
12
Brand Element: Brand Name “Lay’s”
Analysis Score
Meaningful Name does not imply class, category or type 1
Memorable 87% of respondents recalled Lay’s as a chip brand, and 96% said they were familiar with the Lay’s brand
9
Appealing Lay’s is considered classic, however it is not very interesting (no meaningful root word or suffix), or fun (not a play on words, does not induce imagery)
3
Transferable Not transferable. Frito Lay changes the name for this brand in almost all new geographical regions
1
Adaptable Most likely will not be changed because it has brought so much equity to the brand 1
Protectable Its trademarked so it is protectable 9
13
Secondary Sources of Equity
14
Other Brands
Sponsorship:- NHL Team -the
Winnipeg Jets
Company:- Frito-Lay- PepsiCo
Ingredient:- Sriracha: Sriracha
flavored chips
Things
Causes- Love Has No
Labels = Lay’s is a partner
People
Endorsers- Eva Longoria
- Celebrity Chef Michael Simon
Salience
15
Breadth
- 67% of respondents eat Lay’s less than once a month
- Lay’s are consumed less frequently than any of its biggest
competitors- No respondents consumed it
more than once per week
Depth
Recall: 84% unaided recall
Recognition: 100% were familiar with and classified Lay’
s as Chips
Primary Characteristics
1. The chip size2. Different flavors3. Comes in a bag4. Different ingredients
within chip flavor variety
Performance
16
Product Reliability, Durability
Only 34% of respondents said that they associated “good
quality” with the brand Lay’s
Secondary Features
1. Portion control, snack2. Can be used for a variety
of recipes, pairs well with certain dips (as recommended online)
3. Can be eaten on the go4. Satisfies dietary/ allergy
restrictions
Performance
17
Style & Design
● 81% of respondents think of Lay’s and its image as a classic. Their logo and packaging are simple, very colorful, and easy to recognize
● On a scale of 1 to 5, respondents gave Lay’s chips an average rating of 2.7 on “dipability”
Service Effectiveness, Empathy: Lay’s Marketing “Do us a flavor
contest”
Effectiveness: customer is given control over flavor variety/choices and thus perceives high level of service and dedication to customer satisfaction
Empathy: consumers understand that the brand greatly values their input and
understands consumers’ desire for flavors that align with their preferences,
favorite foods, fantasies, etc.
Price
● 69% of respondents believed Lay’s were priced fairly
● 21% thought they were priced high or too high,
● 10% thought they were priced low or too low
User Profiles
Respondents view the common Lay’s consumer as:● Children & 18-25 year olds,
males and females● Couch potato, lazy● Sports fans● Social young adults (people at
parties/bbqs)
Imagery
18
Purchase & Usage Situations
The three most popular consumption occasions forLay’s chips are:
○ Parties○ Snacks○ BBQ’s
Imagery
19
Personality & Values
Percent of respondents that associated Lay’s and these values:
○ Classic: 81%○ Family friendly:45%○ Trustworthy: 21%○ Likable: 38%
Judgment Quality
Texture, Saltiness, Tastiness and Variety of flavors were all qualities that respondents believed Lay’s satisfied.
20
Credibility
● Trustworthiness: only 21% of respondents associated “trustworthiness” with the Brand Lay’s
● However, the vast majority of respondents (81%) described Lay’s as “classic”, the highest rating of all
competitors, implying a form of credibility
Judgment Superiority
● Lay’s was not considered superior to its competitors in any of the most important chip qualities, except for for saltiness.
● Tastiness and variety of flavors were its more superior qualities but Doritos received similar ratings in both of these areas.
21
Feelings
22
Ratings of How Respondents Felt After Eating The Following Chips (Scale of 1-5)
Lay’s
Lay’s develops little equity in this dimension:
● Lay’s received an average rating of 2.7 for the feeling “happy” by respondents after eating
● However, Lay’s also leads the competition in feelings of guilty, disappointed with self, self conscious, and gross after eating
Resonance
23
Attitudinal Attachment
Lay’s has small but significant attachment from consumers● Only 14% respondents felt emotional attachment and
said that their life would be worse without lays
● 32% of respondents were slightly/moderately/very interested in merchandise with the Lay’s name on it
ResonanceCommunity (Brand + Consumer + others)
Lay’s develops little community based equity● Only 2% of respondents felt
probably/ definitely felt a deep connection with others that eat Lay’s.
● Likewise for those that like to talk about Lay’s with others
24
Engagement
Lays struggles to create consumer involvement via social media:
● 14% of Respondents follow Lay’s on social media.
Resonance
25
What Lay’s tries to do:-do us a flavor competition (2012-2015), dousaflavor.com, #
DoUsAFlavor,- flavor swap competition (2016), flavorswap.com,
#FlavorSwap, vote online and create a gif to share votes with friends
-”become a fan” on webpage: “Sign up for exclusive updates on new tastes, fun tips,
entertainment and great deals. If you want to up your snack game, SNACK PERKS is for
you.”-social media engagement on Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest,
Youtube#lays
LoyaltyConsumers showed high consideration for substitutes:
● Only 8% of respondents were either somewhat or extremely unlikely to buy another brand of chips if Lay’s were unavailable
Equity RatingWhat’s in consumer’s mind + brand marketing = equity
26
Weight (%) Rating (1-10) Score(Rating x weight)
4 P’s 15 7.5 1.13
Positioning 30 9 2.7
Brand Elements 15 7 1.05
Secondary Sources 10 4 .4
Brand Resonance Pyramid Model
30 6 1.8
Total 100 n/a ~7.1
Appendix
Primary Research Overview
● Target Market: Students between the ages of 18 and 25.
● Methods used:○ Interview (8 responses)○ Survey (129 started surveys, 77 total
responses)
27
Survey Responses
28
29
Survey Questions
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
Interview Questions1. Do you eat chips? Why, why not?2. How often do you eat chips? For what occasions do you purchase them? 3. What do you eat with chips?4. Do you eat Lay’s potato chips?5. Who are Lay’s biggest competitors?6. What makes lays different than other chips?7. What makes it the same?8. What brand do you purchase most often? Why?9. Describe Lays in 5 words.
10. Describe (competitor) in five words.11. Describe how you feel when you eat lays.12. What kind of person eats Lays (gender, age, occupation, hobbies)?13. What kind of person eats (competitor)?14. What do you look for in chips when you purchase them? (Variety of flavor, natural flavor, crazy flavors, price, etc.)15. What foods would you eat as an alternative to chips?16. What new options would you like to see in the chips market?17. What is the biggest negative about lays?
45
Interview Findings1. Most people do eat chips because they taste good and they are a convenient snack to eat on-the-go. 2. Usually less than once per week. Are mostly consumed at social gatherings and bought for parties rather than personal
consumption.3. Most respondents eat chips with salsa and different dips.4. Half of our interview respondents said they ata Lay’s, the other half said they didn’t.5. Lay’s, Doritos, Tostitos, Sunchips, Ruffles, Pringles6. Classic, original flavors, thinner, 7. More air than chips in the bag, crunchy texture, size of chip and packages, price, classic flavors.8. Corn chips (such as Tostitos, Doritos, and Mission Chips) because they are more versatile and can be eaten with meals.9. Classic, yummy, salty, plain, round, weak, fragile, thin, variety of flavors, thin, small, oily
10. Tostitos: Mexican, tortillas, flour, scoops, partya. Doritos: triangle, multi-flavored, cheesy, creative, Locos Tacos, flavorful, great commercials, savory, orange,
cheesyb. Ruffles: strong, wavy, thick, dry, “dippable” (need to be paired with dip)c. Sun Chips: wavy, healthier, tasty, limited flavors
46
Interview Findings 11. Satisfied, fat, unhealthy, guilty, happy, angry, gross 12. 10-35, both genders, who likes junk food, attend social gatherings 13. Tostitos: 16-24, mexican food lovers, both genders Doritos: Football fans, students, party goers, Ruffles: People who watch sports, such as at a super bowl party, eating them with dip, more mature audience Sunchips: expensive, care about taste a little more, college students and up 14. Good taste, good value for what I pay (price) 15. Crackers, granola bars, peanuts, chex-mix, fruits, popcorn, hummus, veggies and dip 16. Healthier chips, more favors (but not too crazy), less air in the chip bags. 17. Unhealthy, oily, too thin.
47
Sources:http://www.fritolay.com/snacks/product-page/lays
http://www.fritolay.com
48