Date post: | 22-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | thomas-bryce |
View: | 441 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Grafton Golf Club and Driving Range
60 Main StreetGrafton, MA 01519
CIVT 660 – Senior Capstone Design
Presented By:
Thomas Bryce, Samuel Giard, Zachary Kemmer, Kevin McCabe, Timothy Nietupski
Project TeamResponsibility of Team Members:
Samuel Giard – Project Manager
Kevin McCabe – Municipal Engineer
Thomas Bryce – Environmental Engineer
Timothy Nietupski – Structural Engineer
Zachary Kemmer – Geotechnical Engineer
Project Description
Double-tiered Synthetic Turf Driving Range
Hydro range component in order to maximize distance
Pro-shop
Locker Rooms
Restaurant/bar facility
16.2 acre project site
Existing Site Conditions
Project Management
DESIGN PHASE: PLANNING/DESIGN
Time: Schedule
Cost: Budget
Safety Issues
Environmental & Public welfare concerns
Quality Control
CONTROLS
Meeting Minutes
Project Time Sheet (Billable vs non-billable)
Project Schedule
Project Management
ZONING REQUIREMENTS
Existing Overlay: “Fisherville Smart Growth Overlay District” (FSGOD)
Creation of dense residential/mixed use Affordable Housing (40B)
Process required to initiate “Community Business” (CB) Overlay
Initiate proposed amendment
Submission to planning board
Notify Public – “Notice of Public Hearing”
Hold Public Hearing
Submission of plans/amendments of proposed overlay to MA Attorney General for final approval
Project Management
BENEFITS TO THE COMMUNITY
Transforming a contaminated, decrepit site into a usable, community friendly complex
Provides recreational opportunities for local residents
Brings business to the surrounding community
Job opportunities for residents
Tax revenue for the City of Grafton
Site and Civil Design
Existing Site
Parcel size:
16.20 Acres
Work zone Roughly 8.4 Acres
Fisherville Pond
Blackstone
River
Site and Civil Design
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
Site and Civil Design
Stormwater BMPs (Better Management Practices )
Layout A: Grass Channel, Deep sump & Hooded catch Basin, Extended Dry Detention Basin
Layout B: Oil Grit Separator, Grass Channel, Extended Dry Detention Basin
Both Provide 81% Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Removal
Required 80% TSS Removal
A
B
Site and Civil Design
Site and Civil Design
• Proposed site conditions increase peak flow
approximately 30%
• “In a 50 year storm the peak storm water flows leaving
the premises will not be increased by more than 10%”
• Detention basin volume of approximately 15,000 ft3 to
offset the peak flow increase
Site and Civil Design
PARKING LOT
Compliance with Grafton Zoning By-Law section 4.2
One tree per 5 parking spaces
Drop Off area provided
3 Handicap spaces provided
Utilities Design
Water Service Connection Design
Purpose: To service Domestic Water and Fire Suppression Demands for the complex
Existing Conditions:
10” Asbestos Concrete (AC) Water Main on South side of Rt. 122A
Existing water service connection abandoned and capped in 1999
Calculations:
82 Fixture Units (FU) Demand = 39 GPM
Needed Fire Flow (NFF) =900 GPM for 4 hours
Total Flow = 939 GPM
5” Service Pipe serves 701-1199 GPM (Per MA State Plumbing Code)
Utilities Design Cont’d.
Proposed Design:
5” Ductile Iron Service Connection
Mechanical Joint Tapping Gate Valve with Curb Box
Neptune Protectus III Water Meter (To Split Service)
Installation Specs:
10’ horizontally from Sewer Main
2’ above Sewer Main
Utilities Design Cont’d.
Sewer Service Connection Design
Purpose: To adequately serve all Sewage Flow
Existing Conditions:
21” Reinforced Concrete (RC) Main on North side of Rt. 122A
Existing Sewer Connection to site abandoned and capped in 1999
Calculations:
Estimated Daily Flow = 7060 GPD
Estimated Peak Flow = 98 FU = 42 GPM at Peak
Utilities Design Cont’d.
Proposed Design:
6” PVC SDR 35 Sewer Service Connection (Min. Per Grafton Sewer Regulation)
110’ Length
Consistent 2% Slope
Self Cleaning Velocity = 2 ft./s
Installation 5’ Below grade at Foundation Slab
Saddle Connection to existing main
Sewer Drop Manhole at Main
Environmental Design
Site History/Environmental Remediation:
Mill destroyed by fire in 1999.
Deposited asbestos fire retardant materials to the immediate surrounding area.
All soils and materials exposed to asbestos still bearing under current MassDEP regulations.
North parcel to be encapsulated with a geo-synthetic clay layer to prevent infiltration and further contamination.
Above: MassDEP Pre - Construction Site Remediation
Environmental DesignWetland Resource Areas / Functions:
Shoreline of Fisherville Pond is composed of lacustrine wetlands.
Retains sediments and act as assimilators and bio-transformers of nutrients and wastes.
Natural balance of habitat species provides biological control within the ecosystem.
Golf ball collection system (floating debris fence) to be installed on the Fisherville Pond
Removal of shoreline wetlands to ensure safe and ease of access for golf ball retrieval
Top Right: Proposed Site ConditionsBottom Right: Floating Containment Boom Detail Bottom Left : Lacustrine Wetlands (North Parcel)
Environmental DesignProject Thresholds :
In accordance with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) regulations, project threshold impacts include and require a mandatory Environmental Notification Form (ENF):
301 CMR 11.03(1)(b)(2) – Creation of five or more acres of impervious area (Geo-synthetic Clay Liner)
301 CMR 11.00 (3)(a)(2) - Alteration requiring a variance in accordance with the Wetlands Protection Act
301 CMR 11.00 (3)(b)(1) - Alteration of 500 or more linear feet of bank along a fish run or inland bank. (Priority Concern)
Environmental DesignWetland Mitigation:
Proposed replication conditions to comply with General Performance Standards set forth in 310 CMR 10.55 (4)(b): Bordering Vegetated Wetlands (BVW’s).
4080 SF of BVW’s to be relocated within the Blackstone Canal, an adjacent hydraulic connection to the South parcel.
Replication design to meet the function of performance habitat mitigation to restore the natural balance of marine life within the watershed.
Environmental Design
Above: GIS Map of Fisherville Mill Site (Wetlands Delineation)– Grafton, MA
Top Right: North Parcel Wetland Removal
Bottom Right: South Parcel Wetland Replication
Environmental Design
Municipal/State/Federal Permits to be Filed:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – Environmental Notification Form (ENF)
MassDEP – WPA Form 1 – Request for Determination of Applicability
MassDEP – WPA Form 3 – Notice of Intent
MassDEP – Bureau of Resource Protection – Waterways Regulation Program – Chapter 91 License
Grafton Conservation Commission – Notice of Intent and Application for Permit
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Application for Department of the Army Permit (Navigable Waterways Construction)
COE Wetlands Delineation Manual – Routine Wetland Determination
Geotechnical/Foundation Design
Site Conditions:
Underlying bedrock layers of Ponaganset and Hope Valley Alaskite Gneiss
Multiple course to fine sand layers
Heavy metal and petroleum contamination within soil
Ground water level 8 feet below grade with frost line at 4 feet
N – Values calculated from
boring logs
Internal Friction “Φ˚”
determined via approximate
relationships, per McCarthy
Groundwater Table based off
boring logs
4’ frost line traditionally
accepted as typical in MA
Dense, Coarse Sand
N = 35, Φ = 39˚, γ = 125
Dense, Coarse Sand
N = 29, Φ = 40˚, γ = 120
Medium, Coarse Sand
N = 35, Φ = 39˚, γ = 98
Ground Water
Frost Line
Bedrock
Geotechnical/Foundation Design
Lined Area
• 6.3 acres to be capped
• Bentonite Geosynthetic
Clay Liner (GCL)
• Astroturf to be placed over
GCL in field area (yellow)
• Area to be capped without
Astroturf (blue)
Geotechnical/Foundation Design
Field
1” - Astroturf
3” - Crushed Gravel
3” - Sand
Existing Subgrade
30ml – Polyurethane Sheet
1/4” – G.C.L.
Geotechnical/Foundation Design
Left: Engineered Cap
Hydrologic SealMetal Edging
Compacted Fill
Contaminated SubgradeRight: Anchor Trench
Astroturf LayersClean Fill
Geotechnical/Foundation Design
Below: Tension
Rebar Layout
Left: Light and
Netting Pole Design
8 – No. 18 bars
Poles Value (lbs./ft2)
Bearing Pressure 2,321
Ultimate Bearing Capacity 54,359
Allowable Bearing Capacity
18,120
Geotechnical/Foundation Design
Left: Foundation
G.C.L. Seal
Right: Pole G.C.L. Seal
Structural Design
Overview of Design:
Two-story structure with a single slope roof and gutter system
Structural steel framing, metal stud and drywall partitions, with reinforced concrete slabs on grade and on deck
Cantilevered driving stalls
CMU and brick cavity shear wall façade, glass curtain wall
Elevator shaft wall and stairwell shaft
5’ foundation wall and continuous footings
Design capacity of 125 people
The structure is fully compliant with ADA Standards
Best management practices for sustainability
Structural Design
Design of Structural Components:
Design in compliance with IBC 2009, ASCE/SEI 7-05 and AISC Steel Manual
Member design based off of design loads from building code, building use, building design
Mixed use occupancy, most conservative used
Beam, girder, column, shear wall, connections, reinforced concrete slab design complete with supporting calculations
All structural steel members designed with ASTM A992 steel
Connections to be shop welded with double angles, field bolted
All bolts to be 7/8” ASTM A325-N steel
Structural Design
Framing Plan:
Roof and floor framing plan layouts are identical
Different loadings
Structural Design
Member Schedule:
Load path through structural components – vertical and horizontal
Member Schedule
Element Symbol Shape Length (ft.) Weight (lbs.)
Beams
RSB1 W12x22 40 880
RSB2 W10x22 30 660
RB1 W14x30 40 1200
RB2 W10x22 30 660
SB1 W18x46 40 1840
SB2 W14x30 30 900
B1 W21x68 40 2720
B2 W16x45 30 1350
Girders
RSG1 W21x68 45 3060
RSG2 W10x45 15 675
RG1 W24x84 45 3780
RG2 W21x44 15 660
SG1 W33x141 45 6345
SG2 W24x117 15 1755
G1 W24x207 45 9315
G2 W24x192 15 2880
Columns
A3 W14x82 30 2460
A9 W14x82 30 2460
B3 W14x82 30 2460
B9 W14x82 30 2460
C3 W14x82 30 2460
C9 W14x82 30 2460
D3 W14x82 30 2460
D9 W14x82 30 2460
Structural Design
Floor Plans:
Building is 60’ x 110’
First Floor: Lobby, pro-shop, locker rooms
Second Floor: Kitchen, restaurant, bar
Structural Design
Drawings:
All drawings completed using “Revit Structure 2012” and “AutoCAD Civil 3D 2013” software
A special thanks to all of the following professors for their contributions and efforts with this final project
Prof. Anderson
Prof. Hopcroft
Prof. Davidson
Prof. Lambrechts
Prof. Duggan
Matt Gault – Aqua Greens
Questions? Golf Tips?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvpwG50fLnU