+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 4)Profitability Analysis

4)Profitability Analysis

Date post: 01-Dec-2014
Category:
Upload: nurul-aashikhin
View: 165 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
39
8.1 CHAPTER VIII ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 8.0 INTRODUCTION Economic analysis is a continuation of market analysis which had been done in design project one. Economic analysis is a process done to determine whether the plant will give profit or loss to the company by analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the economy. 8.1 CAPITAL COST ESTIMATION Capital costs are the total cost needed to build a plant. Capital cost are fixed and it is not depends on the level of output. The cost other than the purchased cost of equipment must take into consideration in order to calculate the capital cost. Table 8.1 show the factors that affecting the cost associated with evaluation of capital cost of chemical plants. Estimation of capital cost can be classified into three types according to their accuracy and purpose:
Transcript
Page 1: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.1

CHAPTER VIII

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

8.0 INTRODUCTION Economic analysis is a continuation of market analysis which had been done in design

project one. Economic analysis is a process done to determine whether the plant will

give profit or loss to the company by analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the

economy.

8.1 CAPITAL COST ESTIMATION

Capital costs are the total cost needed to build a plant. Capital cost are fixed and it is

not depends on the level of output. The cost other than the purchased cost of

equipment must take into consideration in order to calculate the capital cost. Table 8.1

show the factors that affecting the cost associated with evaluation of capital cost of

chemical plants.

Estimation of capital cost can be classified into three types according to their accuracy

and purpose:

Page 2: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.2

Table 8.1: Factors affecting the cost associated with evaluation of capital cost of chemical plants Factor Associated With The

Installation Of Equipment Symbol Comments

1. Direct project expenses

(a) Equipment f.o.b. cost

(f.o.b.= free on board)

퐶 Purchased cost of equipment at manufacturer's site

(b) Material required for

Installation

퐶 Includes all piping, insulation and fireproofing, foundation and structural support,

instrumentation and electrical, and painting associated with equipment

(c) Labor to install equipment

and material

퐶 Includes all labor associated with installing the equipment and material mentioned in

(a) and (b)

2. Indirect project expenses

(a) Freight, insurance and taxes 퐶 Includes all transportation cost for shipping equipment and materials to the plant

site, all insurance on the items shipped, and any purchase taxes that may be

applicable

(b) Construction overhead 퐶 Includes all fringe benefit such as vacation, sick leave retirement benefit, etc.; and

salaries and overhead for supervisory personnel

(c) contractor engineering

expenses

퐶 Includes salaries and overhead for the engineering, drafting, and project

management personnel on the project

3. Contingency and fee

Page 3: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.3

(a) Contingency 퐶 A factor to cover unforeseen circumstances. These may include loss of time due to

storms and strikes, small changes in the design, and unpredicted price increases.

(b) Contractor fee 퐶 This fee varies depending on the type of plant and a verity of other factors

4. Auxiliary facilities

(a) Site development 퐶 Includes the purchase of land, grading and excavation of the site; installation and

hook-up of electrical, water and sewer systems; and construction of all internal

roads, walkways, and parking lots

(b) Auxiliary buildings 퐶 Includes administration offices, maintenance shop and control rooms, warehouses,

and service buildings (e.g., cafeteria, dressing rooms, and medical facility)

(c) Off-sites and utilities 퐶

Includes raw material and final product storage; raw material and final product

loading and unloading facilities; all equipment necessary to supply required process

utilities (e.g., cooling water, steam generation, fuel distribution systems, etc.); central

environmental control facilities (e.g., waste water treatment, incinerators, flares,

etc.); and fire protection systems

(Source:Turton,2003)

Page 4: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.4

Preliminary ( approximate) estimates

Authorization (budgeting) estimates

Detailed ( quotation) estimates

There are a few techniques in estimating the cost of a new chemical plant. There are:

1. Lang factor technique

Lang factor technique is a simple technique to estimate the capital cost. The

total cost is calculated by multiplying the total purchased cost for all major items of

equipment by a constant, which is called the Lang Factor. Values for Lang Factors,

FLang are given in Table 8.2 below.

Table 8.2: Lang Factors for the Lang factor technique Type of chemical plant Lang Factor= FLang

Fluid processing plant 4.74 Solid-fluid processing plant 3.63 Solid processing plant 3.10

( Source: Turton, 2003)

The capital cost calculation is calculated using Equation 9.1 below

퐶 = 퐹 ∑ 퐶 , (8.1)

Where

퐶 = the capital cost (total module) of the plant

퐹 = the purchased cost for the major equipment units

N = the total number of individuals unit

퐶 , = the Lang factor

This technique is insensitive to changes in process. It cannot accurately account for the

common problems of special materials of construction and high operating pressure.

Page 5: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.5

2. Module costing technique

The equipment module costing technique is a common technique to estimate the cost

of a new chemical plant. This approach, introduced by Guthrie, (1969) in the late 1960s

and early 1970s, forms the basis of many of the equipment module techniques in use

today. This costing technique relates all costs back to the purchased cost of equipment

evaluated for some base conditions.

Deviations from these base conditions are handled by using multiplying factors that

depend on the following:

The specific equipment type

The system pressure

The specific materials of construction

Equation 8.2 below used to calculate the bare module cost for all equipment. The bare

module cost is the sum of the direct and indirect cost shown in Table 8.3.

퐶푩 = 퐹 퐶 (8.2)

Where

퐶 = bare module equipment cost which are direct and indirect

cost

퐹 = bare module cost factor

퐶 = purchased cost for base condition

Page 6: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.6

Table 8.3: Summary of equation used in estimating equipment cost

Purpose Formulae Equation

Purchased equipment cost, 퐶 log 퐶 = 퐾 + 퐾 log 퐴 + 퐾 [log 퐴] 8.3

Pressure factor, Fp for process vessel 퐹 , =

(푃 + 1)퐷2[850− 0.6(푃+ 1)] + 0.00315

0.0063 8.4

Pressure factor, Fp for other process equipment log 퐹 = 퐶 + 퐶 log 푃 + 퐶 [log 푃] 8.5

Bare module and material factor for heat exchangers, process vessels and pumps

퐶 = 퐶 퐹 = 퐶 퐵 + 퐵 퐹 퐹 8.6

(Source: Turton, 2003)

8.1.1 Steps for Calculating Bare Module Costs

Figure 8.1: Step to estimate bare module cost for equipment (Source: Turton,2003)

Page 7: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.7

8.1.2 Cost of Equipment

The cost of major equipment such as reactor, distillation column separator and heat

exchanger are calculated to estimates the cost of piping and insulation. From Figure

9.1, the equipment use in this plant can be concluded as in Table 8.4 below:

Table 8.4: Total equipment used in plant Items Quantity 1 Storage tank 7 2 Heater 3 3 cooler 4 4 Mixer 4 5 Reactor 2 6 Separator 2 7 Heat exchanger 1 8 Distillation column 2 9 Compressor 1 Total 26

(Source : Tourton,2003)

8.1.2.1 Cost of Reactor The purchased cost of separator at ambient operating pressure using any kind of

material for construction, 퐶 is calculated using 퐶 /푉 versus V graph. The volume of

reactor made from carbon steel is calculated by substituting value in Table 8.5 into

Equation 8.7 below;

퐴 = (8.7)

Table 8.5: Purchased cost,푪풑풐 of the reactor Reactor Height Diameter Total volume 퐶 /A 퐶 Hydroformylation reactor 4m 5m 42 840 35280 Hydrogenation reactor 5m 4m 42 840 35280

From the graph of 퐶 /푉 versus V, the 퐶 for both reactor as stated in Table 8.5 above.

The bare pressure factor, FP for reactor with thickness less than 0.0063 m is found to be

1. The bare module factor, FBM for reactor is found to be 4. Thus, CBM for

hydroformylation and hydrogenation reactor is calculated using Equation 8.6;

Page 8: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.8

퐶 (푟푒푎푐푡표푟) = 퐶 퐹

= 35280푥4

= $141120

This is the bare module cost for 2001 (CEPCI=397). The cost for 2010 can thus be

calculated by using Equation 9.8 as follows using the CEPCI of 525. (Chemical

Engineering Design, 2008)

퐶 = 퐶 (8.8)

For reactor,

퐶표푠푡푖푛2010 = 퐶표푠푡푖푛2001푥퐶표푠푡푖푛푑푒푥푖푛2010퐶표푠푡푖푛푑푒푥2001

= 141120푥

= $186619.60

= RM 565,514.10

For three hydrogenation reactor = RM 565,514.10 x 3 = RM 1,696,542.24

Total cost for purchasing reactors =RM 565,514.10 + RM 1,696,542.24

=RM 2,262,056.33

8.1.2.2 Cost of Separator The purchased cost of separator at ambient operating pressure using any kind of

material for construction, 퐶 is calculated using Equation 8.3. The constant value of K1 ,

K2, K3 are 3.4974, 0.4485 and 0.1074 respectively. Meanwhile, the capacity, A of the

separator is in terms of volume, m3. Thus A is calculated using Equation 8.7 as below:

퐴 = ( ) ( . ) = 7.82푚

Page 9: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.9

Therefore, C°p is calculated by using Equation 8.3 that gives the total of $9631.38.

The bare module factor, FBM for demister pad made from nickel alloy gives identification

number as 65 (Turton, 2003) and the factor is found to be 5.3. The bare module cost

then calculated as below;

퐶 = ($9631.38)(5.3) = $51046.31

Bare Module Cost, CBM obtained above was from the analysis made during the period

of May to September 2001 with an average value of the CEPCI, I1 of 397 (Turton,

2003). CEPCI, I2 is obtained from the Appendix A (Figure A.2) where I2 is 520.

Therefore, cost of separator in 2011 is calculated using Equation 8.8:

퐶 = ($51046.31)520397

= $66861.67

= RM 202,611.1

8.1.2.3 Cost of Heat Exchanger The costing of a shell and tube heat exchanger, with floating head type, heat transfer

area of 24.10 m2, pressure of 81 bars and having carbon steel as material of

construction using the algorithm outlined in Figure 8.1.

The cost curve for this heat exchanger is shown in Figure 8.2 below. Referring to the

evaluation path shown in Figure 8.3,

퐶 (2001) =퐶퐴푥퐴

=$650푚

푥24.1푚

= $15,665

Page 10: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.10

Figure 8.2: Purchased cost for heat exchanger

The bare module cost, CBM for shell and tube heat exchanger is given in Equation 8.6.

The B constant value is as shown in Table 8.6.

Table 8.6: Constants for bare module factor for heat exchanger

Equipment Type Equipment Description B1 B2

Heat exchanger

Fixed tube sheet, floating head, U-tube, bayonet, kettle reboiler, and Teflon tube 1.63 1.66

(Source: Turton, 2003)

The pressure factor is obtained from Equation 8.4. Inserting the three constants shown

in Table 9.7 and P = 80 barg (81 bar)

log 퐹 = 0.03881− 0.11272 log 81 + 0.08183[log 81]

log 퐹 = 0.1218

∴ 퐹 = 1.32

The value of FM can be found from Figure 8.3 by using identification number of one. The

details for identification number of one as shown in Table 8.8.

Cp0 /A

2

A

Page 11: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.11

Figure 8.3: Material factor

From Figure 8.3, the material factor, FM is 1. This is the case since at base conditions,

(material of construction is carbon steel and operating near atmospheric pressure) the

value of FM and also FP are always unity.

Substituting the data into Equation 8.6;

퐶 (2001) = 퐶 퐹 = 퐶 퐵 + 퐵 퐹 퐹

= 30488푥(1.63 + 1.66푥1푥1.08)

= $104,354

This is the bare module cost for 2001 (CEPCI=397). The cost for 2010 can thus be

calculated as follows using the CEPCI of 525. (Chemical Engineering Design, 2008)

Mat

eria

l fa

ctor

,

Identification

Page 12: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.12

Table 8.7: Pressure factor for heat exchanger

Equipment Type Equipment Description C1 C2 C3

Pressure Range (barg)

Heat exchanger

bayonet, fixed tube sheet, floating head, kettle reboiler, U-

tube (both shell and tube) 0.03881 -0.11272 0.08183 5<P<140

(Source: Turton, 2003)

Table 8.8: Identification number for material factor for heat exchanger

identification number Equipment Type Equipment Description Material of

construction

1 Heat exchanger Double pipe, multiple pipe, fixed tube sheet, floating head CS-shell/CS-tube

(Source: Turton, 2003)

Page 13: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.13

퐶표푠푡푖푛2010 = 퐶표푠푡푖푛2001푥퐶표푠푡푖푛푑푒푥푖푛2010퐶표푠푡푖푛푑푒푥2001

= 104354푥525397

= $138000

= RM 418,181.80

8.1.2.4 Cost of distillation column

For distillation column, the 퐶 value is obtained by using 퐶 /푉 versus V graph. The

volume of distillation column is calculated as below;

Height = 15.056 m ; Diameter = 1.3728 m ;

Material of Construction: Carbon steel.

By using the value of height and diameter above, the volume of column is calculated as:

hrV 2

056.153728.1 2

314.89 m

From Figure H.1 (appendix), the 퐶 /푉 obtained is 800.

Thus, 8000

VCp

14.896500 pC

0pC = $57941

The pressure factors for process vessels,Fp is calculated by using equation 8.4 as

expressed below.

Fp

0063.0

00315.0)12.1(6.08502

3728.1)12.1(

= 0.78

Page 14: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.14

The bare module cost, CBM for distillation column is given in Equation 8.6. The B

constant value is as shown in Table 8.9 below.

Table 8.9: Constants for bare module factor for distillation column

Equipment Type B1 B2

Distillation column 2.25 1.0

(Source: Turton et al, 2003)

Substituting in Equation 8.6, thus;

FBM = B1 + B2 FP FM

= 2.25 + (1.82) (0.78) (1.0)

= 3.67

Bare Module Cost, CBM;

CBM = 0pC FBM

= 57941 (3.67)

= $ 212643.50

This is the bare module cost for 2001 (CEPCI=397). The cost for 2010 can thus be

calculated as follows using the CEPCI of 521.9. (Chemical Engineering Design, 2008)

New CBM = 397

9.521212643.5

= $ 279543.20

= RM 847,101.50

The purchased cost of vessel internal at ambient operating pressure using any kind of

material for construction 퐶 is calculated using Equation 8.3. The constant value of K1 ,

K2, K3 are 2.9949, 0.4465 and 0.3961 respectively. So, the 퐶 is;

Page 15: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.15

D = 1.3728 m; A = 1.50 m2; Number of trays = 25 trays

Material of construction = Carbon Steel

210310210

10 )(log)(loglog AKAKKC p

21010 )50.1(log3961.0)50.1(log4465.09949.2

= 1218.45

Formula for Sieve Tray:

From Table A.5, Material and Quantity Factors for Sieve Trays

qBMpBM FNFCC 0

Where,

N = the number of tray

Fq = the quantity factor for trays

For tray >20,

Fq = 1.00

Thus, bare module cost is calculated as below;

qBMpBM FNFCC 0

00.167.32545.1218

= $ 111792.79

= RM 335378.36

This is the bare module cost for 2001 (CEPCI=397). The cost for 2010 can thus be

calculated as follows using the CEPCI of 521.9. (Chemical Engineering Design, 2008)

New CBM = 397

9.52136.335378

= RM 440891.60

Page 16: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.16

Total Costing for Distillation Column = RM 838629.60 + RM 440891.60

= RM 1279521.20

Assuming the distillation column 1 is the same properties with the distillation column

2.Therefore, Total Costing for Distillation Column 3 and 4 is = RM 1279521.20x 2

= RM 2559042.40

The bare module cost for all equipments are concluded in Table 8.10 below. Almost all

of the equipments are made from carbon steel since the components involve in this

plant are not reactive towards carbon steel.

Table 8.10: Summary on bare module cost for equipment used in 1-propanol production plant

Equipment Material of Construction

Bare module cost at non-base

conditions, 푪푩푴(RM)

Bare module cost at base conditions, 푪푩푴풐 (RM)

Compressor Compressor (K-100) Carbon steel 3,719,731.02 2,812,824.45

Heat Exchanger

Heat Exchanger(E-105) Carbon steel 418,140 316,192.62

Fired-Heater

Fired-Heater (E-100) Carbon steel 720,794.58 545,057.91

Fired-Heater(E-101) Carbon steel 994,515.08 752,042.91

Fired-Heater(E102) Carbon steel 964,742.601 729,529.10

Cooler

Cooler (E-103) Carbon steel 602,959.70 455,952.40

Cooler (E-104) Carbon steel 610,575.30 461,711.16

Cooler (E-106) Carbon steel 590,093.41 446,222.98

Cooler (E107) Carbon steel 602,959.70 455,952.40

Reactor

Reactor (PFR-100) Carbon steel 565,514.10 427,593.60

Reactor (CRV-100) Carbon steel 1,696,542.25 1,282,780.80

Storage Tank

Page 17: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.17

Storage Tank (Tk-101) Carbon steel 172,628.07 130,539.70

Storage Tank (Tk-102) Carbon steel 201,651.47 152,486.93

Storage Tank (Tk-103) Carbon steel 201,651.47 152,486.93

Storage Tank (Tk-104) Carbon steel 187,677.17 141,919.69

Storage Tank (Tk-105) Carbon steel 172,628.07 130,539.70

Storage Tank(Tk-106) Carbon steel 187,677.17 141,919.69

Storage Tank(Tk-107) Carbon steel 82,682.06 62,523.38

Separator

Vessel (V-101) Carbon steel 202,590.86 154,670.32

Vessel (V-102) Carbon steel 213082.08 161,130.64

Mixer Mixer (Mix-100) Carbon steel 3,455.49 2,613.01

Mixer (Mix-101) Carbon steel 6,274.97 4,745.07

Mixer (Mix-103) Carbon steel 1,521.99 1,150.92

Mixer (Mix-104) Carbon steel 1,004.18 759.35

Distillation Column DC (T-100) Carbon steel 10,253,895.70 7,753,898.47

DC(T-101) Carbon steel 9,409,710.45 7,115,533.83

Waste treatment Cast steel 62,523.44 82,379.03

Totals 32,847,222.38 24,875,157

8.1.3 Grass roots and total module cost

According to Turton et al, (2003), the term grass roots refers to a completely new facility

in which we start the construction on essentially undeveloped land, a grass field. The

term total module cost refers to the cost of making small to moderate expansions or

alterations to an existing facility. It is necessary to account for other costs in addition to

the direct and indirect costs (item 1 and 2 respectively) which are equivalent to bare

module cost costs to estimate these costs. These additional costs are contingency and

fee costs as well as auxiliary facilities costs as shown in Table 8.1 (item 3 and 4

respectively).

Page 18: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.18

The total module cost can be evaluated from the following formula

퐶 = ∑ 퐶 , = 1.18∑ 퐶 , (8.9)

and the grass roots cost can be evaluated from

퐶 = 퐶 + 0.5∑ 퐶 (8.10)

Where n is represents the total number of pieces of equipments. Inserting the values

into the equations above equations gives the following

퐶 = 1.18 퐶 ,

= 1.18푥(32,847,222,38)

= 푅푀38,759,722.41

퐶 = 퐶 + 0.5 퐶

= 38,759,722.41 + 0.5푥(24,875,157.00)

= 푅푀51,197,300.91

8.2 ESTIMATION OF MANUFACTURING COSTS The cost associated with the day-to-day operation of a chemical plant must be

estimated before economic feasibility of a proposed process can be assessed. There

are many elements that influence the manufacturing cost. A list of important costs

involved, including a brief explanation of each cost, is given in Table 8.11. The cost

information provided in the table is divided into three categories.

Page 19: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.19

Table 8.11: Factors affecting the cost of manufacturing(COM)

FACTOR DESCRIPTION OF FACTOR

1. Direct costs Factor that vary with the rate of production

A. Raw materials (CRM)

Cost of chemical feed stocks required by the process.

Flow rates obtained from the PFD

B. Waste treatment (CWT)

Costs of waste treatment to protect environment

C. Utilities (CUT) Costs of utility streams required by process. Includes

but not limited to

a. Fuel gas, oil, and/ or coal b. Electric power c. Steam (all pressures) d. Cooling water e. Process water f. Boiler feed water g. Instrument air h. Inert gas (nitrogen) etc. i. Refrigeration Flow rates for utilities found on the PFD/PIDs

D. Operating labor (COL)

Costs of personnel required for plant operations

E. Direct supervisory and clerical labor

Cost of administrative/ engineering and support

personnel.

F. Maintenance and repairs

Costs of labor and material associated with the

maintenance

G. Operating supplies Costs of miscellaneous supplies that support daily

operation not considered to be raw materials. Example

include chart paper, lubricants, miscellaneous

chemical, filters, respirators and protective clothing for

operators, etc.

H. laboratory charges Costs of routine and special laboratory test required for

product quality control and troubleshooting.

I. Patents and royalties

Cost of using patented or licensed technology.

Page 20: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.20

2. Fixed cost Factors not affected by the level of production

A. Depreciation Costs of associated with physical plant (buildings,

equipment, etc.). Legal operating expense for tax

purposes.

B. Local taxes and insurance

Costs associated with property taxes and liability

insurance. Based on plant location and severity of the

process.

C. Plant overhead cost (sometimes referred to as factory expenses)

Catch-all costs associated with operations of auxiliary

facilities supporting the manufacturing process. Costs

involve payroll and accounting services, fire protection

and safety services, medical services, cafeteria and

any recreation facilities, payroll overhead and

employee benefits, general engineering, etc.

3. General expenses Costs associated with management level and

administrative activities not directly related to the

manufacturing process

A. Administration costs

Costs of administration. Includes salaries, other

administration, buildings, and other related activities.

B. Distribution and selling costs

Costs of sales and marketing required to sell chemical

products. Includes salaries and other miscellaneous

costs.

C. Research and development

Costs of research activities related to the process and

product. Includes salaries and funds to research-

related equipment and supplies, etc.

(Source : Turton)

I) Direct manufacturing cost

These costs represent operating expenses that vary with production rate. When product

demand drops, production rate is reduced below the design capacity. At this lower rate,

we would expect a reduction in the factors making up the direct manufacturing costs.

These reductions may be directly proportional to the production rate, for example, raw

Page 21: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.21

material, or might be reduced slightly, for example, maintenance costs or operating

labor.

II) Fixed manufacturing cost

These are independent of changes in production rate. They include property taxes,

insurance, and depreciation, which are changed at constant rates even when the plant

is not in operation.

III) General expenses

These costs represent an overhead burden that is necessary to carry out business

functions. They include management, sales, financing, and research functions. General

expenses seldom vary with production level. However, items such as research and

development and distribution and selling cost may decrease if extended periods of low

production levels occur.

The cost of manufacturing, COM can be estimated when the following costs are known.

I) Fixed capital investment, (FCI):(CGR)

II) Cost of operating labor (COL)

III) Cost of raw material (CRM)

IV) Cost of utilities (CUT)

V) Cost of waste treatment (CWT)

8.2.1 Estimation of Operating Labour Cost

The technique used to estimate operating labor requirements is based on data obtained

from five chemical companies and correlated by Alkayat and Gerrard. According to this

method, the operating labor requirement for chemical processing plants is given by

푁 = 6.29 + 31.7푃 + 0.23푁.

(8.11)

Page 22: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.22

where 푁 is the number of operators per shift, 푃 is the number of processing steps

involving the handling of particulate solids, for example, transportation and distribution,

particulate size control, and particulate removal. 푁 is the number of nonparticulate

processing steps handling and includes compression, heating and cooling, mixing and

reaction. In general, value of 푃 is zero and the value of 푁 is given by

푁 = ∑퐸푞푢푖푝푚푒푛푡 (8.12)

Where the equipment is refers to compressors, towers, reactors, heaters/furnace and

exchangers. The value of 푁 is the number of operators required to run the process

unit per shift. A single operator works on the average 49 weeks (3 weeks off for

vacation and sick leave) a year, five 8-hour shifts a week. This amounts leads to

49푤푒푒푘푠푦푒푎푟 푥

5푠ℎ푖푓푡푤푒푒푘. 표푝푒푟푎푡표푟 =

245푠ℎ푖푓푡푠푦푒푎푟.표푝푒푟푎푡표푟

A chemical plant normally operates 24 hours/day and this requires

365푑푎푦푠푦푒푎푟

푥3푠ℎ푖푓푡푠푑푎푦

=1095푠ℎ푖푓푡푠

푦푒푎푟

The number of operators needed to provide this number of shifts is

1095푠ℎ푖푓푡푠

푦푒푎푟푥푦푒푎푟.표푝푒푟푎푡표푟

245푠ℎ푖푓푡푠= 4.5표푝푒푟푎푡표푟푠

Using Equation 8.11 and information in Table 8.12;

푁 = 6.29 + 31.7푃 + 0.23푁.

= [6.29 + 0 + 0.23푥7] .

= 2.81

Page 23: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.23

Table 8.12: Results for the estimation of operating labor

Equipment type Number of Equipment 푁

1) Compressors 1 1

2) Exchangers 1 1

3) Heaters 3 3

4) Reactors 2 2

5) Vessels 3 -

TOTAL 7

Note : Pumps and Vessels are not counted in evaluating 푁 .

From calculation above, the number of operators required per shift is 2.81. So,

Operating labor = 4.5푥2.81 = 12.65 (rounding up to the nearest integer yields 13

operators)

To estimate the cost of operating labor, the hourly wage of an operator is required.

Chemical plant operators are relatively highly paid. The hourly rate for miscellaneous

plant and operators is RM20 (Department of Human Resource). Therefore

8ℎ표푢푟푠푑푎푦

푥푅푀20퐻표푢푟푠

푥344푑푎푦푦푒푎푟

= 푅푀55,040

퐿푎푏표푢푟푐표푠푡푖푠 = 13푥푅푀55,040

=푅푀715,520

푦푒푎푟(푓표푟2001)

∴ 퐶표푠푡푓표푟2010 = 715,520푥525397

= 푅푀946,216.62

8.2.2 Cost of Raw Material The production of 1-Propanol is to reach 100,000 metric tonne per year. The costs of

raw material needed for this production rate are shown in Table 8.13 below. From Table

8.13, the total raw material cost is RM 19,596,816.43.

Page 24: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.24

Table 8.13: Raw Material Cost

Raw Materials Amount (kg/hr) Cost (RM/kg) RM/hr(x1000)

Ethylene 6805 1.50 10,207.50

Hydrogen 3338 1.00 3338

Carbon monoxide 30565 1.50 10,188.33

Catalyst 48157.2 455 21,911,526

Total 19,596,816.43

(Source : www.titangroup.com,www.mox.cokayom.my)

8.2.3 Cost of Utilities This term includes steam (high pressure, medium pressure, low pressure), cooling and

process water, electricity, boiler feed water and effluent treatment.

Table 8.14: Cost of utilities

Utilities Price (RM/unit) Amount RM/year

Steam 1.00/kg 26.32 kg/h 217,197.92

Cooling water 0.05/kg 341.85kg/hr 141,115.68

Electricity 0.087/kWh 53kWh 38,068.42

Total 394,382.02

(Source: Encyclopedia of Chemical Processing and Design)

8.2.4 Cost of Waste Treatment

The cost of waste treatment is calculated and concluded in Table 8.15 below.

Table 8.15: Waste treatment Cost

Item Price (RM/unit) Amount RM/year

Waste 2.42/m3 0.14 m3/h 2,742.02

Total 2,742.02

(Source: Fogler)

Page 25: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.25

8.2.5 Calculation of Manufacturing Cost

The cost of manufacturing with and without depreciation can be obtained using the

formulae given by Turton, (2003)

퐶푂푀 = 0.280퐹퐶퐼 + 2.73퐶 + 1.23(퐶 + 퐶 + 퐶 ) (8.13)

and

퐶푂푀 = 0.180퐹퐶퐼 + 2.73퐶 + 1.23(퐶 + 퐶 + 퐶 ) (8.14)

where COM and COMd are cost of manufacturing with and without depreciation

respectively. Other symbols are the same as encountered before. Using the value of

fixed capital investment (FCI which is equivalent to CGR) estimated in section 8.2.2, the

production cost for 1-propanol can be calculated as follows

퐶푂푀 = 0.280퐹퐶퐼 + 2.73퐶 + 1.23(퐶 + 퐶 + 퐶 )

= 0.280(51,197,300.91) + 2.73(946,216.62)

+ 1.23(394,382.02 + 2,742.02 + 19,596,816.43)

= 41,510,962.41

≈ 푅푀42푥10푦푟

And

퐶푂푀 = 0.180퐹퐶퐼 + 2.73퐶 + 1.23(퐶 + 퐶 + 퐶 )

= 0.180(51,197,300.91) + 2.73(946,216.62) + 1.23(394,382.02 + 2,742.02 +

19,596,816.43)

= 36,391,232.31

≈ 푅푀37푥

The direct (variable) and fixed manufacturing costs can be evaluated as follows

푉푎푟푖푎푏푙푒퐶표푠푡(푉퐶) = 퐶 + 퐶 + 퐶 + 1.33퐶 + 0.069퐹퐶퐼 + 0.03퐶푂푀

Page 26: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.26

= 19,596,816.43 + 2,742.02 + 394,382.02 + 1.33(946,216.62) + 0.069(51,197,300.91)

+ 0.03(41,510,962.41)

= 푅푀26,030,351.21

And

퐹푖푥푒푑퐶표푠푡(퐹퐶) = 0.708퐶 + 0.168퐹퐶퐼

= 0.708(946,216.62) + 0.168(51,197,300.91)

= 푅푀9,271,067.92

8.3 TOTAL REVENUE

SELLING PRICE FOR N-PROPANOL

The price for 1 kg n-propanol is RM4.40 (Matrade). So, the total revenue for production

of 95,836,944kg of n-propanol and carbon monoxide and propanal are RM

567,405,823.50 as shown in Table 8.16.

Table 8.16: Total revenue

Selling Item Selling Price (RM/Kg) Production Rate (kg/ hr) Income (RM/year) n-Propanol 4.40 11642.00 422,911,948.80 CO 1.30 39.36 410,162.69 Propanal 2.50 6980.80 144,083,712 Total (RM/yr) 18662.16 567,405,823.50

(Source:Matrade)

8.4 PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS According to Turton (2003), in the economic analysis of a project, it is assumed that any

new land purchases required are done at the start of the project, that is, at time zero.

After the decision has been made to build a new chemical plant, the construction phase

of the projects starts. Depending on the size and scope of the project, this construction

may take anywhere from six months to three years to complete.

Page 27: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.27

In this plant, it is assumed that it takes a typical value of two years for time from project

initiation to the start-up of the plant. Over the two-year construction phase, there is a

major capital outlay. This represents the fixed capital investment for purchasing and

installing the equipment and auxiliary facilities required to run the plant. The distribution

of this fixed capital investment is usually larger towards the beginning of construction.

At the end of second year, construction has finished and the plant is started up. At this

point, the additional expenditure for working capital is required to float the first few

months of operations. This is a one-time expense at the start-up of the plant and will be

recovered at the end of the project.

After start-up, the process begins to generate finished products for sale, and yearly

cash flows become positive. The cash flows for early years of operation are larger than

those for later years due to the effect of depreciation. The time for depreciation used in

this plant is six years. The method of depreciation used is based on Modified

Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS). Under this method, all equipment is

assigned a class life, which is the period over which the depreciable portion of the

investment may be discounted. Most equipment in a chemical plant has a class life of

9.5 years. The MACRS method uses a double declining balance method and switches

to a straight line method when straight line method yields a greater depreciation

allowance for the year. The Table 8.17 is the depreciation allowance using MACRS

method.

In order to evaluate the profitability of a project, a life of a project must be assumed.

This is not the working life of the equipment nor is it the time over which depreciation is

allowed. It is a specific length over which the profitability of different projects is to be

compared. Lives of 10, 12 and 15 years are commonly used for this purpose. In this

plant, a project life of 10 years is assumed.

Page 28: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.28

Table 8.17: Depreciation schedule for MACRS method for equipment with a 9.5 year

class life

Year Depreciation allowance (% of capital investment)

1 20.00

2 32.00

3 19.20

4 11.52

5 11.52

6 5.76

(Source: Analysis, Synthesis and Design of Chemical Process, 2003)

8.4.1 Estimation of Land Cost The non-discounted techniques do not take into account the time value of money and

are not recommended for evaluating new large projects. Figure 9.6 below shows the

graph of cumulative cash flow for non-discounted after tax cash flow based on

information in Table 9.19. The taxation rate, t used is 45% since the rate is often in the

range of 40% to 50% according to Turton, (2003).

8.4.2 Nondiscounted After-Tax Cash Flow Cost of land: RM 129.17 – RM 139.93 per meter square Wide of land required: 121,532 m2 according to Dairen Chemical Company in Johor Total cost of land: RM 139.93 x 121532 m2= RM 17,005,972.76.

Page 29: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.29

8.4.3 Discounted After-Tax Cash Flow

For discounted criteria, we discount each of the yearly cash flows back to time zero.

The following tables show the discounted cash flow from 10% to 16% p.a. All the value

is in unit of $106

Figure 8.4: Cumulative cash flow diagram for nondiscounted after-tax cash flow

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Cash

(RM

106 )

Time (years)

cumulative cash position

FCIL

FCL

LandLand

+WC

payback period

Page 30: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.30

Table 8.18: Nondiscounted after-tax cash flows

End of

year (k) Investment 푑 FCIL- ∑d R 퐶푂푀 (R-COMd-dk)x(1-t) +dk Cash flow Cumulative Cash flow

0 17 - 51 - - - -17 -17

1 34 - 51 - - - -34 -51

2 27.2 - 51 - - - -9 -78.2

3 - 10.2 40.8 56 39 1.3 1.3 -76.9

4 - 16.32 24.48 56 39 12.58 12.58 -64.32

5 - 9.792 14.688 56 39 10.948 10.948 -53.372

6 - 5.8752 8.8128 56 39 9.9688 9.9688 -43.4032

7 - 5.8752 2.9376 56 39 12.9064 12.9064 -30.4968

8 - 2.9376 0 56 39 11.4376 11.4376 -19.0592

9 - - 0 56 39 8.5 8.5 -10.5592

10 - - 0 56 39 8.5 8.5 -2.0592

11 - - 0 56 39 8.5 8.5 6.4408

12 - - 0 56 39 8.5 8.5 14.9408

13 - - 0 56 39 8.5 8.5 23.4408

Page 31: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.31

14 - - 0 56 39 8.5 8.5 31.9408

15 - - 0 56 39 8.5 8.5 40.4408

16 - - 0 56 39 8.5 8.5 48.9408

17 - - 0 56 39 8.5 8.5 57.4408

18 - - 0 66 39 8.5 8.5 65.9408

19 27.2 - 0 66 39 13.5 40.7 106.6408

All of the values are in RMmillion

Cost of land = RM17 million

Total fixed capital investment, FCIL = RM51 million

Plant start-up at end of year2

Taxation rate =26% (MIDA)

Salvage value of plant = RM 1 million

Assume a project life of 17 years

Page 32: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.32

Table 8.19: Discounted cash flow for discount rate = 7% p.a

End of year (k)

Non-discounted cash flow

Discounted cash flow

Cumulative Discounted cash flow

0 -17 -17 -17

1 -34 -31.7757 -48.7757

2 -27.2 -23.7575 -72.5332

3 1.3 1.061187 -71.472

4 12.58 9.597222 -61.8748

5 10.948 7.805773 -54.0691

6 9.9688 6.642632 -47.4264

7 12.9064 8.037457 -39.389

8 11.4376 6.656787 -32.7322

9 8.5 4.623437 -28.1087

10 8.5 4.320969 -23.7878

11 8.5 4.038289 -19.7495

12 8.5 3.774102 -15.9754

13 8.5 3.527198 -12.4482

14 8.5 3.296447 -9.15174

15 8.5 3.080791 -6.07094

16 8.5 2.879244 -3.1917

17 8.5 2.690882 -0.50082

18 8.5 2.514843 2.014026

19 40.7 11.25389 13.26791

Table 8.20: Discounted cash flow for discount rate = 8% p.a

End of year (k)

Non-discounted cash flow

Discounted cash flow

Cumulative Discounted cash flow

0 -17 -17 -17

1 -34 -31.4815 -48.4815

2 -27.2 -23.3196 -71.8011

3 1.3 1.031982 -70.7691

4 12.58 9.246676 -61.5224

5 10.948 7.451025 -54.0714

Page 33: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.33

6 9.9688 6.282035 -47.7894

7 12.9064 7.53076 -40.2586

8 11.4376 6.179379 -34.0792

9 8.5 4.252116 -29.8271

10 8.5 3.937145 -25.89

11 8.5 3.645504 -22.2445

12 8.5 3.375467 -18.869

13 8.5 3.125432 -15.7436

14 8.5 2.893919 -12.8497

15 8.5 2.679554 -10.1701

16 8.5 2.481069 -7.68903

17 8.5 2.297286 -5.39175

18 8.5 2.127117 -3.26463

19 40.7 9.430681 6.16605

Table 8.21: Discounted cash flow for discount rate = 9% p.a

End of year (k)

Non-discounted cash flow

Discounted cash flow

Cumulative Discounted cash flow

0 -17 -17 -17

1 -34 -31.1927 -48.1927

2 -27.2 -22.8937 -71.0864

3 1.3 1.003839 -70.0825

4 12.58 8.911989 -61.1705

5 10.948 7.115449 -54.0551

6 9.9688 5.94407 -48.111

7 12.9064 7.060243 -41.0508

8 11.4376 5.740146 -35.3106

9 8.5 3.913636 -31.397

10 8.5 3.590492 -27.8065

11 8.5 3.294029 -24.5125

12 8.5 3.022045 -21.4904

13 8.5 2.772518 -18.7179

14 8.5 2.543595 -16.1743

Page 34: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.34

15 8.5 2.333573 -13.8407

16 8.5 2.140893 -11.6998

17 8.5 1.964122 -9.73572

18 8.5 1.801947 -7.93377

19 40.7 7.91573 -0.01804

Table 8.22: Discounted cash flow for discount rate = 10% p.a

End of year (k)

Non-discounted cash flow

Discounted cash flow

Cumulative Discounted cash flow

-17 -17 -17 -17

-34 -30.9091 -47.9091 -34

-27.2 -22.4793 -70.3884 -27.2

1.3 0.976709 -69.4117 1.3

12.58 8.592309 -60.8194 12.58

10.948 6.797847 -54.0216 10.948

9.9688 5.627128 -48.3944 9.9688

12.9064 6.623024 -41.7714 12.9064

11.4376 5.335725 -36.4357 11.4376

8.5 3.60483 -32.8309 8.5

8.5 3.277118 -29.5537 8.5

8.5 2.979198 -26.5745 8.5

8.5 2.708362 -23.8662 8.5

8.5 2.462147 -21.404 8.5

8.5 2.238316 -19.1657 8.5

8.5 2.034832 -17.1309 8.5

8.5 1.849848 -15.281 8.5

8.5 1.68168 -13.5994 8.5

8.5 1.5288 -12.0706 8.5

40.7 6.654775 -5.41578 40.7

Page 35: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.35

Figure 8.5: Cumulative cash flow diagram using different discount rates

i) Payback Period Payback period is defined as time required after start-up, to recover the fixed capital

investment, FCIL required for the project, with all cash flows discounted back to time

zero. The payback period shown in Figure 9.8 can be found as follows.

퐷푖푠푐표푢푛푡푒푑푣푎푙푢푒표푓푙푎푛푑 + 푤표푟푘푖푛푔푐푎푝푖푡푎푙 = 17푥10 +10.2푥101.1546

= 푅푀24.65푥10

Therefore, find time after start-up when cumulative cash flow is –푅푀24.65푥10

푃푎푦푏푎푐푘푝푒푟푖표푑 = 5 +(−30.50 + 24.65)(−30.50 + 19.06)

= 5.51푦푒푎푟푠

This means that plant takes about 5.5 years after start-up to get back the fixed capital

investment. In other words, it takes about 7.5 years for the plant to "repay" the sum of

the original investment after the commencement of constructions.

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

0 5 10 15 20Cash

(RM

mill

ion)

Time (years)

Cumulative cash flow diagram using different discount rates

Page 36: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.36

ii) Net Present Worth The discounted cumulative cash position, more commonly known as the net present

value (NPV) or net present worth (NPW) of the project is defined as cumulative

discounted cash position at the end of the project. The net present value decision rule is

to accept positive net present value project and reject project with the negative NPV.

The net present worth for the project is RM6.17x106 as shown in Table 9.21. Therefore,

the project is accepted since the net present value is positive.

iii) Present Value Ratio Again, the net present value of a project is greatly influenced by the level of fixed capital

investment and a better criterion for comparision of projects with different levels may be

the present value ratio (PVR)

푃푉푅 =푃푟푒푠푒푛푡푣푎푙푢푒표푓푎푙푙푝표푠푖푡푖푣푒푐푎푠ℎ푓푙표푤푠푃푟푒푠푒푛푡푣푎푙푢푒표푓푎푙푙푛푒푔푎푡푖푣푒푐푎푠ℎ푓푙표푤푠

A present value ratio of unity for a project represents a break even situation. Values

greater than unity indicate profitable processes while those less than unity represent

unprofitable projects. Therefore, for this project, the PVR can be evaluated as follows

푃푉푅

=1.03 + 9.25 + 7.45 + 6.28 + 7.53 + 6.18 + 4.25 + 3.93 + 3.65 + 3.38 + 3.13 + 2.89 + 2.68

+2.48 + 2.30 + 2.12 + 9.43 푥10

(17 + 31.48 + 23.32)푥10

=77.97푥1071.80푥10

= 1.08>1

iv) Discounted Cash Flow Rate of Return The discounted cash flow rate of return (DCFROR) is defined to be the interest rate at

which all the cash flows must be discounted in order for net present value or net

present worth of the project to be equal to zero. Therefore, the DCFROR represents the

highest, after-tax interest or discount rate at which the project can just break even. It is

worth noting that for evaluation of the discounted cash flow rate of return, no interest

Page 37: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.37

rate is required since this is what is calculated. If the value of DCFROR is greater than

internal discount rate, then the project is considered to be profitable.

The net present values for several discount rates which have previously been

calculated (Table 8.18 to Table 8.22) are summarized in the following Table 8.23.

Table 8.23: NPV as a function of discount rates ( values in $million)

Interest or Discount Rate Net present worth

7% 30.32

8% 21.82

9% 14.36

10% 7.84

12% -2.93

The value of DCFROR can be calculated by interpolating from the table above.

(퐷퐶퐹푅푂푅 − 10%)(12%− 10%) =

(0 − 7.84x10 )(−2.93x10 − 7.84x10 )

∴ 퐷퐶퐹푅푂푅 = 11.46%

Clearly, the DCFROR is greater than internal discount rate (11.46% p.a). Therefore, the

project is considered to be profitable.

8.5 CONCLUSION Table 8.26 summarizes the costs and profitability criteria for this plant. The fixed capital

investment for this plant is around RM51 million and the cost of manufacturing with and

without depreciation are RM41million and RM36 million respectively. The breakeven

point is achieved when the plant produces 6000 metric tonnes per year of 1-propanol

Page 38: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.38

which is well below the planned production of 100000 metric tonnes per year. By

considering a discount rate of 10% per annum, the payback period is 5.5 years after

start-up or 7.5 years after the beginning of the constructions. The net present worth or

net present value is found to be RM50.86 million) and the present value ratio is 1.08.

The discounted cash flow rate of return for the plant is computed to be 11.46% which

gives the net present value of zero. Based on these criteria, it can be concluded that the

proposed 1-propanol plant is profitable.

Table 8.24: Summary of economic analysis

Items Data/Value

Grass root cost, CGR or Fixed capital investment, FCI RM51*

Cost of manufacturing with depreciation, COM RM41*

Cost of manufacturing without depreciation, COMd RM36*

Depreciation method MACRS

Variable cost, VC RM26*

Fixed cost, FC RM9.27*

Project life after start-up 17 years

Payback period 5.5 years after start-up

Net present value at 8% discount rate (NPV) RM6.16*

Present value ratio (PVR) 1.08

Discounted cash flow rate of return (DCFROR) 8.99%

Salvage value RM1*

.Note*: in million

Page 39: 4)Profitability Analysis

8.39

8.6 REFERENCES 1) Turton et al, 2003, Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes, Prentice Hall International Series. 2) Peters. Max S. and Timmerhaus, Klaus D. (1991). “Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers.” 4th Edition. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Company. 3) Ulrich, G. D. (1984). “A Guide to Chemical Engineering Process Design and Economics.” Toronto : John Wiley & Sons. 4) Perry, R.H. and Green, D.W. (1997). “Perry’s Chemical Engineering Handbook.” 7th ed. USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc 5) Sinnott, R.K. (1983). “Chemical Engineering Volume 6.” 1st ed. Great Britain: Pergamon Press.

6) Mark, H.F., Othmer, D.F., Overberger, C.G. and Searborg, G.T. (1963). “Kirk-Othmer: Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology Volume 1.” 3rd ed. USA: Interscience Publisher. 414-424.


Recommended