+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector...

5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector...

Date post: 24-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
55
Vector analysis 1 1/26/2021 Finite spherical square well potential: deuteron, with the use of Mathematica Masatsugu Sei Suzuki and Itsuko S. Suzuki Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton (Date: January 26, 2021) Here we discuss the bound states of deuteron in a three-dimensional (3D) spherical (attractive) square well potential with radius (a) and a potential depth ( 0 V ). This problem is of interest because it is mathematically straightforward and approximate a number of real physical situation. This problem is so familiar and has been used as exercises in standard textbooks of quantum mechanics. In spite of this fact, we present our results of detailed calculations using the Mathematica (ContourPlot) in the this note. It may be useful to understanding the role of angular momentum and potential depth in this model. The energy eigenvalues of the system are determined as a function of the potential depth and angular momentum l 0, 1, 2, 3, 4…. The nature of the wave functions, which depend on the depth of potential well and the orbital angular momentum, is also examined. To this end, we use the ContourPlot (Mathematica) for the boundary condition of the wave functions at the radius a. The boundary condition is given by (1) 1 1 (1) () ( ) () ( ) l l l l xj x iyh iy j x h iy with 2 2 0 x r y for l 0, 1, 2, 3,…. (L.I. Schiff). This condition for l = 0. reduces to a simple form cot y x x . Notations of this boundary condition will be discussed below. For the first time, we found such a form of the boundary condition, in a book, Problems and Solutions of L.I. Schiff Quantum mechanics 3 rd edition (Yoshioka, 1983) [in Japanese]. Typical result derived from this method, is shown below. These results are useful to the understanding of the phase shift analysis (of scattering) such as Levinson’s theorem.
Transcript
Page 1: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 1 1/26/2021

Finite spherical square well potential: deuteron, with the use of Mathematica

Masatsugu Sei Suzuki and Itsuko S. Suzuki

Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton

(Date: January 26, 2021)

Here we discuss the bound states of deuteron in a three-dimensional (3D) spherical

(attractive) square well potential with radius (a) and a potential depth ( 0V ). This problem

is of interest because it is mathematically straightforward and approximate a number of

real physical situation. This problem is so familiar and has been used as exercises in

standard textbooks of quantum mechanics. In spite of this fact, we present our results of

detailed calculations using the Mathematica (ContourPlot) in the this note. It may be

useful to understanding the role of angular momentum and potential depth in this model.

The energy eigenvalues of the system are determined as a function of the potential

depth and angular momentum l 0, 1, 2, 3, 4…. The nature of the wave functions, which

depend on the depth of potential well and the orbital angular momentum, is also

examined. To this end, we use the ContourPlot (Mathematica) for the boundary condition

of the wave functions at the radius a. The boundary condition is given by

(1)

1 1

(1)

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

l l

l l

xj x iyh iy

j x h iy

with 2 2

0x r y

for l 0, 1, 2, 3,…. (L.I. Schiff). This condition for l = 0. reduces to a simple form

coty x x .

Notations of this boundary condition will be discussed below. For the first time, we found

such a form of the boundary condition, in a book, Problems and Solutions of L.I. Schiff Quantum mechanics 3rd edition (Yoshioka, 1983) [in Japanese].

Typical result derived from this method, is shown below. These results are useful to the understanding of the phase shift analysis (of scattering) such as Levinson’s theorem.

Page 2: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 2 1/26/2021

r02 2 a2

2V0

y 22 a2

2E

2

2 23

2

22

25

2

23

27

2

2

E1

E2

E3

l 0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

10

10

20

30

40

50

Fig.1 l = 0. Typical example. E : energy eigenvalue of the bound states which

is the closest to E = 0 among bound states, but E<0. 0V is a potential depth

and a is a radius. The ground state with energy 1E . The first excited state

with energy 2E . The second excited state with energy 3E .

1 2 3 0E E E .

((Levinson’s theorem))

Levinson's theorem is an important theorem in non-relativistic quantum scattering

theory. It relates the number of bound states of a potential to the difference in phase of a

scattered wave at zero and infinite energies. It was published by Norman Levinson in

1949.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levinson%27s_theorem

((Deuteron))

Nucleus of deuterium (heavy hydrogen) that consists of one proton and one neutron (the notation: d or D). Deuterons are formed chiefly by ionizing deuterium (stripping the

single electron away from the atom) and are used as projectiles to produce nuclear reactions after accumulating high energies in particle accelerators. A deuteron also results

from the capture of a slow neutron by a proton, accompanied by the emission of a gamma photon.

Page 3: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 3 1/26/2021

Fig.2 Deuteron consisting of one proton and one neutron in a nucleus.

The reduced mass of deuteron (neutron and proton) is

2

p n P

p n

M M M

M M

.

1. Schrödinger equation for the finite spherical square well

r

V HrL

a

-V0

E

Fig.3 Spherical (attractive) square well potential ( )V r as a function of r. The

potential depth 0V and radius a. 0 0V . 0E E (bound state).

The Hamiltonian for the deuteron in a finite spherical square well potential is given by

Page 4: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 4 1/26/2021

)(2

)1(

2 2

22

rVr

llpH r

,

with the radial linear momentum,

rrri

pr

1ℏ

.

V(r) is the potential energy for the spherical square well,

0 ( )( )

0 ( )

V r aV r

r a

,

where r is the distance between proton and neutron, and is the reduced mass,

1

2

n P

n P

M MM

M M

(of proton or neutron).

Then the Schrodinger equation can be written as

)()()()(2

)1()]([

1

2 2

2

2

22

rErrVrr

llrr

rr

ℏℏ

,

where E is negative and numerically equal to the binding energy.

0E ,

and

)]([1

)()1

(1

)(2

222

rrrr

rrrri

rrri

rpr

ℏℏℏ

.

(i) For r<a,

)()()(2

)1()]([

1

202

2

2

22

rErVrr

llrr

rr

ℏℏ

,

or

0)()(2

)()1(

)]([1

0222

2

rVErr

llrr

rr

ℏ.

Page 5: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 5 1/26/2021

We put

)()( rurr ,

or

0)()(2

)()1(

)( 0222

2

ruVErur

llru

dr

d

(for r<a).

(ii) r>a,

0)(2

)()1(

)(222

2

rEurur

llru

dr

d

(for r>a).

The effective potential is defined as

2

0 2

2

2

( 1)

( )2

( )( 1)

2

eff

l lV

r ar

V

r al l

r

The normalized effective potential effVɶ can be rewritten as

2

2

220

2

2 2

0

2

2( 1)( )

( 1)( )

eff

eff

a VV

a V al l

r

ar l l

r

ɶ

ℏ for r a

and

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

( 1)( )

eff

eff

a VV

a V

al l

r

ɶ

ℏ for r a

Page 6: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 6 1/26/2021

When / 1r a ,

2

2

/ 1 02

2| ( 1)

eff

r a

a Vr l l

So that the bound state (negative energy eigenvalue) exists only when

2

0 ( 1)r l l .

We make a plot of

2

2

2 eff

eff

a VV

ɶ

ℏ as a function of /r a for each l, where 0r is changed

as a parameter.

r a

2 a2 Veff2

l 0

r0 2

3

4

50.5 1.0 1.5

30

20

10

0

10

Fig.4 l = 0. Effective potential

2

2

2 eff

eff

a VV

ɶ

ℏ. 0 0r for the bound state.

r a

2 a2 Veff2

l 1

r0 2

3

4

5

0.5 1.0 1.5

30

20

10

10

20

30

Page 7: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 7 1/26/2021

Fig.5 l = 1. Effective potential

2

2

2 eff

eff

a VV

ɶ

ℏ. 0 ( 1) 2 1.4142r l l for

the bound state. 0r is changed as a parameter; 0 2 5r . 0 0.5r .

r a

2 a2 Veff2

l 2

r0 2

3

4

5

6

0.5 1.0 1.5

30

20

10

10

20

30

Fig.6 l = 2. Effective potential

2

2

2 eff

eff

a VV

ɶ

ℏ. 0 ( 1) 6 2.4495r l l for

the bound state. 0r is changed as a parameter; 0 2 5r . 0 0.5r .

r a

2 a2 Veff2

l 3

r0 3

4

5

6

0.5 1.0 1.5

30

20

10

10

20

30

Fig.7 l = 3. Effective potential

2

2

2 eff

eff

a VV

ɶ

ℏ. 0 ( 1) 2 3 3.4641r l l for

the bound state. 0r is changed as a parameter; 0 3 6r . 0 0.5r .

Page 8: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 8 1/26/2021

r a

2 a2 Veff2

l 4

r0 4

5

6

0.5 1.0 1.5

10

10

20

30

Fig.8 l = 4. Effective potential

2

2

2 eff

eff

a VV

ɶ

ℏ. 0 ( 1) 2 5 4.4721r l l for

the bound state. 0r is changed as a parameter; 0 4 6r . 0 0.5r .

3. Solution with l = 0 case

We consider the case when l = 0, for which there is no centrifugal barrier.

)()()(2

)(2

0022

2

rukruVErudr

d

(r<a)

and

)()(2

)(2

22

2

ruqrEurudr

d

(r>a)

where

2

2

0

2

0

kVE

ℏ ,

2

22q

Eℏ

.

with 0E (bound state). This leads to the condition,

2 2 2 2

0 0 02

2( ) ( )k a qa V a r

ℏ.

The solution of u(r) is obtained as

)sin()( 0rkAru (r<a)

)exp()( qrCru (r>a)

Page 9: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 9 1/26/2021

The continuity of u(r) and u'(r) at r = a, leads to

qaCeakA )sin( 0

qaeqCakAk )()cos( 00

From these two equations, we have

)cot( 00 akakqa (2)

We assume that

yqa , xak 0

Then we have

)cot(xxy , (3)

with

2

0

2

02

22 2raVyx

(4)

where 0r is the radius of the sphere. Figure shows a plot of Eqs.(3) and (4) in the x-y

plane.

((Note))

For 0l ,

1

0

( )cot

( )

xj xx x

j x

, (1)

1

(1)

0

( )

( )

iyh iyy

h iy

leading to the relation

coty x x

Page 10: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 10 1/26/2021

Fig.9 l = 0. A plot of )cot(xxy and 2

2 2 2002

2 V ax y r

ℏ. akx 0 .

qay . The intersection of two curves leads to the solution (graphically

solved). 2

22q

Eℏ

. The curve [ )cot(xxy ] crosses the y=0 line at

( 1, ) (2 1)2

x z n n

; x = /2, 3/2, 5/2.

There is no bound state for

222 0

0 2

22.4674

2

V ar

.

There is a single bound state for

2 2

2

0

3

2 2r

.

Page 11: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 11 1/26/2021

There are two bound states for

2 2

2

0

3 5

2 2r

.

4. The binding energy and potential depth for deuteron

A. Goswami Quantum Mechanics second edition (Wavelend, 2003).

The binding energy of deuteron can be evaluated as follows.

M(H1): mass of proton 938.27208816 MeV

M(n): mass of neutron 939.56542052 MeV

M(d): mass of deuteron 1875.612928 MeV

M(e); mass of electron 0.510998950 MeV

Binding energy = M(H1) +M(n)-M(d) 2.22458 MeV.

M(H1) +M(e) = 938.783087 MeV

M(n)- [M(H1) +M(e)] = 0.7823335 MeV

The stability of the deuteron is an important part of the story of the universe. In

the Big Bang model it is presumed that in early stages there were equal numbers

of neutrons and protons since the available energies were much higher than the

0.782335 MeV required to convert a proton and electron to a neutron. When the

temperature dropped to the point where neutrons could no longer be produced

from protons, the decay of free neutrons began to diminish their population.

Those which combined with protons to form deuterons were protected from

further decay. This is fortunate for us because if all the neutrons had decayed,

there would be no universe as we know it, and we would not be here!

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Particles/deuteron.html

It is known that the deuteron bound state has an energy

2.226E MeV. (we use this value hereafter).

The range of nuclear potential is approximately equal to the Compton wavelength of the pion, which, to a first approximation, meditates the interaction between nucleons, that

is

1.46 fmam c

Page 12: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 12 1/26/2021

where 2135.0 MeV/m c . Using this value of a, and p n

p n

M M

M M

, we have

22

0 247.89

2 2V

a

ℏ MeV

which is much larger than 0E . We make a plot of 2 2

0 02

2r V a

as a function of

2

2 Ey qa a

ℏ. This can be obtained using the ContourPlot of the Mathematica;

2 2 2 2

0 0cot( )y r y r y .

r02

y qa

l 0

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

0

2

4

6

8

Fig.10 The range-depth relation for the square-well potential. The plot of

2 2

0 02

2r V a

as a function of 2

2 Ey qa a

ℏ. This figure is the same

as that shown by Goswami in his book (Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edition,

Wavelend, 2003), except for the scale along the y axis ( 2

0r ).

((Mathematica))

Page 13: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 13 1/26/2021

The radius a:

13

15

1.46168 10 cm

1.46168 10 m

=1.46168 fm

a

The reduced mass :

25

28

8.36887 10 g

=8.36887 10 kg

The potential penetration depth 0V :

0 47.894V MeV.

We use the cgs unit for Mathematica.

Page 14: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 14 1/26/2021

5. Solution of u(r) for r<a with l

We solve the differential equation for r<a

0)()(2

)()1(

)( 0222

2

ruVErur

llru

dr

d

(for r<a).

or

2

2

02 2

( 1)( ) [ ] ( ) 0

d l lu r k u r

dr r

,

where the wave number 0k is defined as

Page 15: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 15 1/26/2021

22

0 02

E V k

.

Now we introduce a dimensionless variable ,

0k r .

Then we have

0)(]1)1(

[ ,22

2

lkull

d

d.

The solution of this differential equation is obtained as

)()()( 21, lllk nAjAu .

where the spherical Bessel function and spherical Neumann function are defined by

)(2

)(2

1

l

l Jj ,

)(2

)(2

1

l

l Nn .

Note that )(ln becomes infinity in the limit of 0 . So we choose the first term

, 0( ) ( )k l l lR r A j k r .

where )()( ,, rurrR lklk and lA is constant.

((Mathematica))

Clear "Global` " ;

eq1 y'' x 1L L 1

x2y x 0;

DSolve eq1, y x , x

y x x BesselJ1

21 2 L , x C 1

x BesselY1

21 2 L , x C 2

Page 16: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 16 1/26/2021

((Note))

We note that

)(2

)(

)()( 2

1

2

1

l

l

lj

J

Ju

.

Thus we have

)()()(

)(

lju

r

rurR .

6. Solution of u(r) for r>a with finite l

We solve the differential equation for r>a

0)(2

)()1(

)(222

2

rEurur

llru

dr

d

, (for r>a).

where

2

2

2E q

,

where q is the wavenumber.

2

2

2 2

( 1)( ) [( ) ] ( ) 0

d l lu r iq u r

dr r

.

Now we introduce a dimensionless variable ,

iqr .

Then we get

0)(])1(

1[)( ,2,2

2

lklk u

llu

d

d.

The solution of this differential equation is obtained as

, 1 2

(1) (2)

1 2

( ) ' ( ) ' ( )

( ) ( )

k l l l

l l

R r B j iqr B n iqr

B h iqr B h iqr

Page 17: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 17 1/26/2021

where )()1(

xhl and )()2(

xhl are the spherical Hankel function of the first and second kind.

)()()(2

)()1(

2

1

)1(xinxjxH

xxh ll

ll

,

)()()(2

)()2(

2

1

)2(xinxjxH

xxh ll

ll

.

The asymptotic forms of (1) ( )lh x and (2) ( )lh x are given by

x

eixh

lxi )2/()1(

)(

,

x

eixh

lxi )2/()2(

)(

,

in the limit of large x. Then we get

( /2) ( /2)

(1)( )

i iqr l qr ile eh iqr i

iqr qr

,

( /2) ( /2)

(2)( )

i iqr l qr ile eh iqr i

iqr qr

,

which means that (2) ( )h iqrℓ

becomes diverging for large r, while (1) ( )h iqrℓ

becomes zero

for large r. So, we choose (1) ( )h iqrℓ

as the solution of )(, rR lk for r>a,

(1)

, ( ) ( )k l l lR r B h iqr .

where B1 is constant.

10. Boundary conditions with finite l

Using the boundary condition at r = a, we determine the energy eigenvalues. We note

that the wave function and its derivative should be continuous at r = a.

(1)

0( ) ( )l l l lA j k a B h iqa ,

(1)

0 0'( ) | ( ) '( ) |l l r a l l r aA k j k r B iq h iqr ,

leading to

Page 18: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 18 1/26/2021

(1)00 (1)

0

'( ) '( )( ) ( )

l l

l l

k iqj k a h iqa

j k a h iqa ,

where

( )'( )l

l

j zj z

z

,

(1)(1)( )

'( )ll

h zh z

z

.

Spherical Bessel function;

1/2( ) ( )2

l lj z J zz

SphericalBesselJ[l, z] (Mathematica)

Spherical Hankel function:

(1) (1)

1/2( ) ( )2

l lh z H zx

SphericalHankel1[l, z] (Mathematica)

________________________________________________________________________

Here we use the recursion formula for (1)( ) ( ), ( ),l l lf j h ,

1 1

2 1( ) ( ) ( )l l l

lf f f

,

1 1( ) ( 1) ( ) (2 1) '( )l l llf l f l f .

From these equations, we have

1

( 1)'( ) ( ) ( )l l l

lf f f

Leading to the relations,

1

1'( ) ( ) ( )l l l

lj z j z j z

z

(1) (1) (1)

1

1'( ) ( ) ( )l l l

lh z h z h z

z

Then, the boundary condition can be rewritten as

Page 19: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 19 1/26/2021

(1) (1)0 1 0 0 1

0

(1)

0

1 1[ ( ) ( ) [ ( ) ( )]

( ) ( )

l l l l

l l

l lk j k a j k a iq h iqa h iqa

k a iqa

j k a h iqa

or

(1)

0 1 0 1

(1)

0

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

l l

l l

k j k a iqh iqa

j k a h iqa

(l = 1, 2, 3, ).

Finally, we get

(1)

1 1

(1)

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

l l

l l

xj x iyh iy

j x h iy

2

2 2 2

0 02

2 ax y r V

(L.I. Schiff, Quantum mechanics)

Note that 1

cos( )

xj x

x (APPENDIX-A)

In summary, we have

(a) l = 0

coty x x for l = 0

(1)

1 1

0 0

cos

( ) ( )cot

sin( ) ( )

xx

xj x iyh iyxx x

xj x h iy

x

.

(b) l = 1, 2, 3, 4, …

(1)

1 1

(1)

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

l l

l l

xj x iyh iy

j x h iy

, for l = 1, 2, 3,…

with 2 2 2

0x y r . We make a plot of 2 2 2

2

2( )y qa E a

ℏas a function of 2 2

0 02

2r V a

with the use of ContourPlot of the Mathematica.

Page 20: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 20 1/26/2021

9. The condition for the bound state energy 0E

Using these boundary conditions, we can determine the values of 0V and l such that

the energy of the bound state E becomes zero. We note that the energy 0E is

equivalent to 0y . Note that l = 0 (s), 1 (p), 2 (d), 3 (f), and 4 (g).

For l = 0, we get the condition cos 0x , leading to

3 5, , ,...

2 2 2x

or

[0 1, ] (2 1)2

z n n

with n = 1, 2, 3,…..

and

2 (0)

2 20

2

2[ (0 1, )] [ (2 1)]

2

a Vz n n

ℏ (l = 0)

For l = 0, 1, 2, 3,…, we have 1( ) 0lj x . The zeros of 1( )lj x is defined by

( 1, )x z l n ,

or

2 (0)

20

2

2[ ( 1, , )]

a Vz l n

where n = 1, 2, 3,,…, (0)

0V is the potential depth for E = 0, l (=1, 2, 3,…) is the orbital

angular momentum, and ( 1, , )l n is the zero of the spherical Bessel function 1( )lj x .

Table 1: Zeros of the spherical Bessel functions.

Number

of zero; 0 ( )j x 1( )j x 2 ( )j x 3( )j x 4 ( )j x

n

1 3.14159 4.49341 5.76346 6.98793 8.18256

2 6.28319 7.72525 9.09501 10.4171 11.7049

3 9.42478 10.9041 12.3229 13.6980 15.0397

4 12.5664 14.0662 15.5146 16.9236 18.3013

5 15.7080 17.2208 18.6890 20.1218 21.5254

___________________________________________________________________

Page 21: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 21 1/26/2021

Table 2: Zeros of the spherical Bessel functions.

Number

of zero 0 ( )j x 1( )j x 2 ( )j x 3( )j x 4 ( )j x

n

1 1.4303 1.83457 2.22433 2.60459

2 2 2.4590 2.89503 3.31587 3.72579

3 3 3.4709 3.9225 4.36022 4.78727

4 4 4.4774 4.9385 5.38696 5.82547

5 5 5.4815 5.9489 6.40497 6.85175

((Mathematica))

Zeroes of the Spherical Bessel functions

Page 22: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 22 1/26/2021

Here we make a plot of 2 (0)

0

2

2 a Vℏ

where E = 0, as a function of l and n.

Page 23: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 23 1/26/2021

l 0 l 1 l 2 l 3 l 4 l 5

2 a2 V00

2

0

100

200

300

400

(a)

Page 24: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 24 1/26/2021

l 0 l 1 l 2 l 3 l 4 l 5

2 a2 V00

2

0

50

100

(b)

Fig.11(a) (b) Plot of 2 (0)

2002

2 a Vr

ℏ where E = 0, as a function of l and n: l = 0, 1, 2,

3,…. n = 1, 2, 3, 4, ….. Note that the bound state (negative energy

eigenvalue) exists only when 2

0 ( 1)r l l from the discussion of the

effective potential.

(a) l = 0: 1

cos( ) 0

zj z

z cos 0z

n (0 1, )z n 2[ (0 1, )]z n

1 / 2 (= 2.46740

2 3 / 2 (= 22.2066

3 5 / 2 (= 61.6850

4 7 / 2 (= 120.903

5 9 / 2 (= 199.859

(b) l = 1: 0

sin( ) 0

zj z

z ; sin 0z

n (1 1, )z n 2[ (1 1, )]z n

1 (= 9.86960

2 2 (= 39.4784

3 3 (= 88.8264

4 4 (= 157.914

5 5 (= 246.740

(c) l = 2: 1( ) 0 (2 1, )j z z z n

Page 25: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 25 1/26/2021

n (2 1, )z n 2[ (2 1, )]z n

1 4.49341(= 20.19073

2 7.72525(= 59.6795

3 10.9041(= 118.8994

4 14.0662(= 197.8580

5 17.2208(= 296.5560

(d) l = 3: 2 ( ) 0 (3 1, )j z z z n ;

n (3 1, )z n 2[ (3 1, )]z n

1 5.76346(= 33.2175

2 9.09501(= 82.7192

3 12.3229(= 151.854

4 15.5146(= 240.703

5 18.6890(= 349.279

(e) l = 4: 3( ) 0 (4 1, )j z z z n ;

n (4 1, )z n 2[ (4 1, )]z n

1 6.9879 (= 48.83075

2 10.4171(= 108.5160

3 13.6980(= 187.6352

4 16.9236(= 286.4082

5 20.1218 (= 404.8868

9. Solution with l = 0 (s-wave)

We now discuss the solution of the Schrödinger equation with l = 0 (s wave). We have the wave function,

0 0( ) sin( ) sin[( ) ] sin( )r

u r A k r A k a A xa

for r a .

( ) exp( ) exp[ ( ) ] exp[ ]r

u r C qr C qa C xa

for r a

0k a , qa

2 2 2 2 2 2

0 0 02

2( ) ( )k a qa V a r

The boundary condition:

Page 26: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 26 1/26/2021

0sin( ) exp( )A k a C qa ,

sin( ) exp( )A C ,

0 0cos( ) ( )exp( )Ak k a C q qa , cos( ) exp( )A C ,

cot .

Normalization:

2 2 2

2 20

2 2

0

sin ( ) exp( 2 )1 4 4

a

a

A k r C qrr dr r dr

r r

,

or

2 22 2 20

02

0 0

2

sin ( )4 4 sin ( )

2 sin(2 )4 [ ]

4

a aA k r

r dr A k r drr

A a

2

2 2

2

22

exp( 2 )4 4 exp( 2 )

42

a a

C qrr dr C qr dr

r

eC

or

22 22 sin(2 )

1 4 44 2

eA a C a

,

sin( ) exp( )A C ,

22 sin cos 2 ( sin )A a

,

2

sin

2 sin cos 2 ( sin )

eC a

.

10. The energy eigenvalue E vs potential depth with l = 0.

Page 27: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 27 1/26/2021

We now use the ContourPlot to determine the relation of 2y vs 2

0r , from the equation

2 2 2 2

0 0cot coty x x r y r y with 2 2

0x r y

which depends only on 2y and 2

0r . Figure 12 shows the scaled energy eigenvalue

22 2

2

2( )

ay qa E

ℏ, as a function of scaled potential depth

22 0

0 2

2 a Vr

for l = 0.

r02 2 a2

2V0

y 22 a2

2E l 0

E1 E2 E3 E4

2

2 3

2

2 5

2

2 7

2

2

0 50 100 150 200

20

0

20

40

60

80

100

Fig.12 l = 0. 2

2 2

2

2( )

ay qa E

ℏ vs

22 0

0 2

2 a Vr

.

0E at 0 ( 1 0 1, );r z l n where 1 0( ) 0j r .

0 01 02 03 04

3 5 7, , ,

2 2 2 2r

,…

As is shown From Fig.10, there is no bound state for

22

0

2

2

2

V a ℏ

.

Page 28: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 28 1/26/2021

There is a single bound state (ground state) for

2 22

0

2

2 3

2 2

V a ℏ

. There are

two bound states (ground state and the first excited state) for

2

2

2

0

2

2

72

2

5

aV.

There are three bound states (ground state, the first excited state, and the second excited

state) for

2 22

0

2

27 9

2 2

V a ℏ

.

Here we define the minimum energy eigenvalue E among the allowed states for fixed

0V . The value of E is the closest to E = 0 (but E<0). We make a plot of the minimum

eigenvalue E as a function of potential depth 0V .

r02 2 a2

2V0

y 22 a2

2E

2

2 23

2

22

25

2

23

27

2

2

E1

E2

E3

l 0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

10

10

20

30

40

50

Fig.13 The energy eigenvalue ( E ) of the bound states which is the closest to E =

0 among bound states, but E<0. The minimum energy (2

2

2 ay E

) as a

function of the potential depth (2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

).

0 01 02 03 04

3 5 7, , ,

2 2 2 2r

,…

11. Wave function for l = 0.

(a) The wave function ( )u r of the ground state for l = 0.

Page 29: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 29 1/26/2021

Below we show the plot of the wave function ( )u r as a function of /r a for the

ground state for l = 0 (s wave). The two nucleons have a substantial probability of being

separated by a distance that is greater than the range of the potential well. The shape of

the wave function is, correspondingly, not very sensitive to the detailed nature of the

potential. The wave function for s = 1.0 ( 02

r s

)is similar to the figure obtained by

Bethe and Morrison. For the ground state with l = 0,

( ) exp( ) exp[ ( ) ]r

u r C qr C qaa

for r a

The quantity 1/ ( )qa can be taken as a measure of the size of the deuteron (the effective

radius of the deuteron). It is shown that the effective radius is considerably larger than the

range of nuclear force.

11

qa .

Thus, most of the area under ( )u r occurs for / 1r a .

r0 2 s

s 1.0

1.41.82.23.0

r a

4 a u rGround state

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

Fig.14 l = 0. Wave function ( )u r for the ground state (s = 1 -3) as a function of

/r a . 2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

. 02

r s

. s is changed as a parameter. 1 3s .

0.2s .

Page 30: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 30 1/26/2021

r0 2 ss 3.05.0

r a

4 a u rGround state

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

Fig.15 l = 0. Wave function ( )u r for the ground state (s = 3 -5) as a function of

/r a . 2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

. 02

r s

and s is changed as a parameter; s = 3.0 –

5.0, s 0.2.

r0 2 s

s 5.07.0

r a

4 a u rGround state

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Fig.16 l = 0. Wave function ( )u r for the ground state (s = 5 - 7) as a function of

/r a . 2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

. 02

r s

and s is changed as a parameter; s = 5.0 –

7.0, s 0.2.

Page 31: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 31 1/26/2021

r0 2 s

s 7.09.0

r a

4 a u r

Ground state

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

Fig.17 l = 0. Wave function ( )u r for the ground state (s = 7 - 9) as a function of

/r a . 2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

. 02

r s

and s is changed as a parameter; s = 7.0 –

9.0, s 0.2.

(b) The wave function ( )u r of the first excited state for l = 0.

The wave function ( )u r of the first excited state for 0l is shown below, as a

function of /r a , where 0r is changed as a parameter. The wave unction ( )u r with

0

3

2r ≃ , is similar to the figure obtained by Bethe and Morrison. Since the energy

eigenvalue of the first excited state is still negative (bound state), but is very close to

zero. So that, the wave function does not decay over a distance much longer than the

radius a.

r0 2 s

s 3.03.43.84.25.0

r a

4 a u rFirst excited state

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

1.0

0.5

0.5

1.0

Page 32: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 32 1/26/2021

Fig.18 l = 0. Wave function ( )u r for the first excited state (s = 3 -5) as a function

of /r a . 2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

. 02

r s

and s is changed as a parameter; s = 3.0 –

5.0, s 0.2.

r0 2 ss 5.07.0

r a

4 a u rFirst excited state

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.5

1.0

1.5

Fig.19 l = 0. Wave function ( )u r for the first excited state (s = 5 - 7) as a function

of /r a . 2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

. 02

r s

and s is changed as a parameter; s = 5.0 –

7.0, s 0.2.

r0 2 ss 7.09.0

r a

4 a u rFirst excited state

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.5

1.0

1.5

Page 33: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 33 1/26/2021

Fig.20 l = 0. Wave function ( )u r for the first excited state (s = 7 - 9) as a

function of /r a . 2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

. 02

r s

and s is changed as a parameter;

s = 7.0 – 9.0, s 0.2.

(c) The wave function ( )u r of the second excited state for l = 0.

r0 2 s

s 5.07.0r a

4 a u r Second excited state

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

1.0

0.5

0.5

1.0

Fig.21 l = 0. Wave function ( )u r for the second excited state (s = 5 - 7) as a

function of /r a . 2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

. 02

r s

and s is changed as a parameter;

s = 5.0 – 7.0, s 0.2.

r0 2 ss 7.09.0

r a

4 a u r Second excited state

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.5

1.0

1.5

Fig.22 l = 0. Wave function ( )u r for the second excited state (s = 7 - 9) as a

function of /r a . 2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

. 02

r s

and s is changed as a parameter;

s = 7.0 – 9.0, s 0.2.

Page 34: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 34 1/26/2021

r0 2 ss 7.09.0

r a

4 a u r Third excited state

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

1.0

0.5

0.5

1.0

Fig.23 l = 0. Wave function ( )u r for the third excited state (s = 7 - 9) as a

function of /r a . 2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

. 02

r s

and s is changed as a parameter;

s = 7.0 – 9.0, s 0.2.

12. ContourPlot of y vs x for l

x k0a

y qa

l 1

r0 11 r0 12 r0 13 r0 14

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Page 35: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 35 1/26/2021

Fig.24 ContourPlot for the boundary condition. y vs x. l = 1. 0E at

0 (1 1 0, )r z n , at which 0 0( ) 0j r . 0 11 12 13 14, , , r

x k0a

y qa

l 2

r0 21 r0 22 r0 23 r0 24

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Fig.25 ContourPlot for the boundary condition. y vs x. l = 2. 0E at

0 (2 1 1, )r z n , at which 1 0( ) 0j r . 0 21 22 23 24, , , r .

Page 36: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 36 1/26/2021

x k0a

y qa

l 3

r0 31 r0 32 r0 33 r0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Fig.26 ContourPlot for the boundary condition. y vs x. l = 3. 0E at

0 (3 1 2, )r z n , at which 2 0( ) 0j r . 0 31 32 33 34, , , r .

Page 37: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 37 1/26/2021

x k0a

y qa

l 4

r0 41 r0 42 r0 43

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Fig.27 ContourPlot for the boundary condition. y vs x. 4l . 0E at

0 (4 1 3, )r z n , at which 3 0( ) 0j r . 0 41 42 43, , r .

13. The energy eigenvalue E vs potential depth with l = 1, 2, 3, and 4.

We now use the ContourPlot of

(1)

1 1

(1)

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

l l

l l

xj x iyh iy

j x h iy

with 2 2

0x r y

We get the scaled energy eigenvalue 2

2 2

2

2( )

ay qa E

ℏ as a function of scaled

potential depth 2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

for l = 1, 2, 3, and 4.

Page 38: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 38 1/26/2021

r02 2 a2

2V0

y 2 qa 2 2 a2

2E

l 0 l 1 l 2 l 3

0 20 40 60 80 100

0

20

40

60

80

100

Fig.28 2

2 2

2

2( )

ay qa E

ℏ vs

22 0

0 2

2 a Vr

for l = 1, 2, 3, and 4.

0E at 0 ( 1, )r z l n , at which 1 0( ) 0lj r

Page 39: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 39 1/26/2021

r02 2 a2

2V0

y2 qa 2 2 a2

2E

l 0 l 1 l 2

l 3

0 10 20 30 40

0

5

10

15

20

Fig.29 2

2 2

2

2( )

ay qa E

ℏ vs

22 0

0 2

2 a Vr

for l = 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4.

0E at 0 [ ( 1, )]r z l n , at which 1 0( ) 0lj r

Page 40: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 40 1/26/2021

r02 2 a2

2V0

y22 a2

2E

l 1

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0

20

40

60

80

100

Fig.30(a) 1l . 2

2 2

2

2( )

ay qa E

ℏ vs

22 0

0 2

2 a Vr

. 2 2 2 2

0 11 12 13, , r

(vertical blue lines).

Page 41: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 41 1/26/2021

r02 2 a2

2V0

y22 a2

2E

l 2

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0

20

40

60

80

100

Fig.30(b) l = 2. 2

2 2

2

2( )

ay qa E

ℏ vs

22 0

0 2

2 a Vr

. 2 2 2 2

0 21 22 23, , r

(vertical blue lines).

Page 42: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 42 1/26/2021

r02 2 a2

2V0

y22 a2

2E

l 3

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0

20

40

60

80

100

Fig.30 (c) l = 3. 2

2 2

2

2( )

ay qa E

ℏ vs

22 0

0 2

2 a Vr

. 2 2 2 2

0 31 32 33, , r

(vertical blue lines).

Page 43: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 43 1/26/2021

r02 2 a2

2V0

y2 2 a2

2E l 4

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Fig.30(d) l = 4. 2

2 2

2

2( )

ay qa E

ℏ vs

22 0

0 2

2 a Vr

. 2 2 2

0 41 42, r (vertical blue

lines).

As is shown From Figs.30, there is no bound state for

2

20

2

2[ ( 1,1)]

V az l

ℏ.

There is a single bound state (ground state) for

2

2 20

2

2[ ( 1,1)] [ ( 1, 2)]

V az l z l

ℏ.

There are two bound states (ground state and the first excited state) for

2

2 20

2

2[ ( 1, 2)] [ ( 1,3)]

V az l z l

ℏ.

There are three bound states (ground state, the first excited state, and the second excited

state) for

Page 44: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 44 1/26/2021

22 20

2

2[ ( 1,3)] [ ( 1, 4)]

V az l z l

ℏ.

Here we define the minimum energy eigenvalue E among the allowed states for fixed

0V . The value of E is the closest to E = 0 (but E<0). We make a plot of the minimum

eigenvalue E as a function of potential depth 0V .

14. The effect of the angular momentum

The minimum value of V0a2 for the p-wave binding (l = 1) is larger than that for the s-

wave binding (l = 0), and so on.

2

20012

2 V a

ℏ (l = 0)

2

20112

2 V a

ℏ (l = 1),

2

20212

2 V a

ℏ (l = 2),

2

20312

2 V a

ℏ (l = 3),

2

20412

2 V a

ℏ (l = 4),

where

012

, 11 , 21 4.49341 1.430297 ,

31 5.76346 1.83457 , 41 6.9879 2.22432

Physically, the meaning of this is very clear. In the case of 1l , there exists a centrifugal

barrier and, therefore, a particle requires stronger attraction for binding. In fact, it can be

shown that the strength of the spherical potential well, 2

0V a , required to bind a particle of

arbitrary l increases monotonically with l. This system does not show any degeneracy in

the l quantum number. (Das).

15. The use of Heisenberg’s principle of uncertainty.

David Bohm, Quantum Theory (Dover, 1079).

The fact that no bound states are possible unless

Page 45: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 45 1/26/2021

2

20

2

2( )

2

a V

ℏ,

is easily understood in terms of the Heisenberg’s principle of uncertainty. To have a

bound state, a particle must be localized roughly within the radius of the well a. To have

a wave function large only in a region of the size of the well, there must also be a range

of momenta /p a ℏ and, therefore, the energy is

2 21 1( )

2 2p

a

ℏ.

Before a particle can be trapped within the well, the potential energy given up when the

particle enters the well must be greater than the kinetic energy that the particle obtains

merely because it is localized within the radius a. Thus, no bound states at all are possible

unless

2

0

1( ) 0

2E V

a

ℏ, or

2

0

2

21

a V

ℏ (bound state)

If 0V is barely great enough to provide the kinetic energy necessary to localize the

particle within the well, then the binding energy E will be very small.

If 0V is increased, the binding energy becomes greater, and eventually 0V becomes so

great that it can supply the kinetic energy necessary to make the wave function oscillate

once within the well. At this point, a new bound state becomes possible. If 0V is made

greater still, eventually a third oscillation becomes possible, then a fourth, etc. Thus, the

number of bound states depends on how much deeper the well is than the minimum

amount needed to contain the particle within the well. We now apply the Heisenberg’s

principle of uncertainty to the case of 1, 2,3,4,l …. Suppose that the linear momentum

is approximated as

0paℏ

,

where 0 is on the order of unity. Then energy E is evaluated as

2

2

0 02[ ( 1)]

2E l l V

a

ℏ≃ .

Page 46: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 46 1/26/2021

The bound state with 0E , appears, only if

2

2 200 02

2( 1) ( 1)

a Vr l l l l

ℏ.

which is consistent with the condition that the effective potential at r a is negative.

2

0 ( 1)r l l .

We make a plot of 2 2 2

0 02 /r a V ℏ as s function of l (l = 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4).

l

r02 2 a2 V0

2

1 2 3 4

10

20

30

40

50

Fig.31 2

2 00 2

2 a Vr

vs the orbital angular momentum l. 2

01 2.4674 ..

2

11 9.8696 . 2

21 20.1907 . 2

31 33.2175 . 2

41 48.8307 .

As shown in Fig.31, the smallest value of 2 2 2

0 02 /r a V ℏ for which exists a bound state

(ground state) with l = 1, is greater than the corresponding value of 2 2 2

0 02 /r a V ℏ for

0l . This is due to the additional repulsive centrifugal potential energy. A particle

possessing angular momentum requires a stronger attractive potential to bind it than a

particle with no angular momentum number. Indeed, it turns out that the minimum square

well potential strength 2 2 2

0 02 /r a V ℏ required to bind a particle of orbital angular

momentum quantum number l increases monotonically with increasing l.

16. Summary

Although the spherical square well is not a realistic model for the internuclear

potential it does give us some useful information on the nuclear force. We note that the

proton and neutron have spin 1/2. In fact, the deuteron has an intrinsic spin (S = 1), but

not 0;

Page 47: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 47 1/26/2021

1/2 1/2 1 0D D D D .

This indicates that the nuclear force is spin dependent. The deuteron has a magnetic

moment and an electric quadrupole moment (Q = 0.0027 x 10-24 cm2). The existence of

the quadrupole moment tells us that the system is not strictly expressed by a spherically

symmetric force. However, the departure of spherical symmetry turns out not to be large.

The ground state of the deuteron is a mixture of 96 % ( 0l ) and 4% ( 2l ) states. This

mixing is due to a spin-orbit coupling in the nucleon-nucleon interaction which is

neglected in our simple model. Further discussion will be given elsewhere.

REFERENCES

H.A, Bethe and P. Morrison, Elementary Nuclear Theory, 2nd edition (Dover, 2006).

L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd edition (Pergamon, 1977).

D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Dover, 1979).

L.I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc, New York, 1955).

E. Merzbacher, Quantum mechanics, 1st edition (John Wiley & Sons, 1961).

J.S. Townsend, A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edition (University

Science Books, 2012).

A. Goswami, Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edition (Waveland Press, 2003).

N. Zettili, Quantum Mechanics, Concepts and Applications, 2nd edition (Wiley, 2009).

A. Das, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edition (World Scientific, 2012). P.223 -

230.

F.S. Levin, An Introduction to Quantum Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2002).

R.L. Liboff, Introductory Quantum Mechanics, 4th edition (Addison-Wesley, 2003).

________________________________________________________________________

APPENDIX-1

Spherical Hankel function of the first kind

(1)

1 ( )ixe

h xx

. (which will be derived below)

xiexh ix 1

)()1(

0 .

2

)1(

1 )(x

ixexh

ix.

3

2)1(

2

33)(

x

ixxiexh

ix .

Page 48: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 48 1/26/2021

4

23)1(

3

15156)(

x

ixixxexh

ix .

Spherical Bessel function

1

cos( )

xj x

x (which will be derived below)

x

xxj

sin)(0 ,

21

cossin)(

x

xxxxj

,

3

2

2

cos3sin)3()(

x

xxxxxj

,

4

22

3

cos)15(sin)25(3)(

x

xxxxxxj

.

Recursion formula:

1 1 0

1( ) ( ) ( )j x j x j x

x .

Rayleigh formula:

x

x

dx

d

xxxj lll

l

sin)

1()1()( .

x

e

dx

d

xxixh

ixlll

l )1

()1()()1( .

Mathematica

( )lj z : SphericalBesselJ[l,z]

(1) ( )l

h z : SphericalHankelH1[l,z]

((Note)) Derivation of the expression of 1( )j x and (1)

1 ( )h x

Using

Page 49: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 49 1/26/2021

1/2( ) ( )2

l lj x J xx

, 1/2

2( ) cosJ x x

x ,

we get

1 1/2

2 cos( ) ( ) cos

2 2

xj x J x x

x x x x

.

We also get

1 0 1

1 cos( ) ( ) ( )

xj x j x j x

x x ,

(1) (1) (1)

1 0 1

1( ) ( ) ( )

ixeh x h x h x

x x .

Plot of 1 0 1( ), ( ), ( )j x j x j x as a function of x

j 1 x j0 x j1 xx

2 3 2

1 2 3 4 5 6

0.5

1.0

Fig.A-1 Plots of 1 0 1( ), ( ), ( ),j x j x j x as a function of x.

Plot of 1 0

(1) (1)( ), ( )ih ix h ix

as a function of x

Page 50: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 50 1/26/2021

ih 1

1ix

h01ix

x1 2 3 4 5

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.4

Fig.A2: Plots of 1 0

(1) (1)( ), ( )ih ix h ix

as a function of x.

APPENDIX-2 Mathematica

((Mathematica-1))

l = 1

Page 51: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 51 1/26/2021

Page 52: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 52 1/26/2021

x k0a

y qa

l 4

r0 4,1 r0 4,2 r0 4,3

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Page 53: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 53 1/26/2021

((Mathematica-2))

Page 54: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 54 1/26/2021

Page 55: 5-4 Finite spherical well revised 2-16-15bingweb.binghamton.edu/~suzuki/QuantumMechanicsII/...Vector analysis 8 2/19/2015 where B1 is constant. 4. Bound states with finite l Using

Vector analysis 55 1/26/2021


Recommended