24/11/2014
1
5 - 1© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
55 Design of Goodsand Services
Design of Goodsand Services
PowerPoint presentation to accompanyHeizer and RenderOperations Management, 10ePrinciples of Operations Management, 8e
PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl
5 - 2© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The objective of the product decisionis to develop and implement a
product strategy that meets thedemands of the marketplace with a
competitive advantage
Product Decision
5 - 3© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The good or service the organizationprovides society
Top organizations typically focus oncore products
Customers buy satisfaction, not justa physical good or particular service
Fundamental to an organization'sstrategy with implications throughoutthe operations function
Product Decision
24/11/2014
2
5 - 4© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Strategy Options
Differentiation Shouldice Hospital
Low cost Taco Bell
Rapid response Toyota
5 - 5© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life Cycles
May be any length from a fewhours to decades
The operations function mustbe able to introduce newproducts successfully
5 - 6© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life Cycles
Negativecash flow
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
Sale
s, c
ost,
and
cash
flow Cost of development and production
Cashflow
Net revenue (profit)
Sales revenue
Loss
Figure 5.1
24/11/2014
3
5 - 7© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life CycleIntroductory Phase
Fine tuning may warrantunusual expenses for1. Research2. Product development3. Process modification and
enhancement4. Supplier development
5 - 8© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life Cycle
Growth Phase
Product design begins tostabilize
Effective forecasting ofcapacity becomes necessary
Adding or enhancing capacitymay be necessary
5 - 9© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life Cycle
Maturity Phase
Competitors now established High volume, innovative
production may be needed Improved cost control,
reduction in options, paringdown of product line
24/11/2014
4
5 - 10© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life Cycle
Decline Phase
Unless product makes aspecial contribution to theorganization, must plan toterminate offering
5 - 11© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life Cycle Costs
Costs incurred
Costs committed
Ease of change
Concept Detailed Manufacturing Distribution,design design service,
prototype and disposal
Perc
ent o
f tot
al c
ost
100 –
80 –
60 –
40 –
20 –
0 –
5 - 12© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product-by-Value Analysis
Lists products in descendingorder of their individual dollarcontribution to the firm
Lists the total annual dollarcontribution of the product
Helps management evaluatealternative strategies
24/11/2014
5
5 - 13© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product-by-Value Analysis
IndividualContribution ($)
Total AnnualContribution ($)
Love Seat $102 $36,720Arm Chair $87 $51,765Foot Stool $12 $6,240Recliner $136 $51,000
Sam’s Furniture Factory
5 - 14© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
New Product Opportunities
1. Understanding thecustomer
2. Economic change3. Sociological and
demographic change4. Technological change5. Political/legal change6. Market practice, professional
standards, suppliers, distributors
5 - 15© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Scope ofproduct
developmentteam
Product DevelopmentSystem
Scope fordesign andengineering
teams
Evaluation
Introduction
Test Market
Functional Specifications
Design Review
Product Specifications
Customer Requirements
Ability
Ideas
Figure 5.3
24/11/2014
6
5 - 16© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Quality FunctionDeployment
1. Identify customer wants2. Identify how the good/service will satisfy
customer wants3. Relate customer wants to product hows4. Identify relationships between the firm’s hows5. Develop importance ratings6. Evaluate competing products7. Compare performance to desirable technical
attributes
5 - 17© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Manufacturability andValue Engineering
Benefits:1. Reduced complexity of products2. Reduction of environmental impact3. Additional standardization of products4. Improved functional aspects of product5. Improved job design and job safety6. Improved maintainability (serviceability) of
the product7. Robust design
5 - 18© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Issues for ProductDevelopment
Robust design Modular design Computer-aided design (CAD) Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) Virtual reality technology Value analysis Environmentally friendly design
24/11/2014
7
5 - 19© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Robust Design
Product is designed so that smallvariations in production orassembly do not adversely affectthe product
Typically results in lower cost andhigher quality
5 - 20© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Modular Design
Products designed in easilysegmented components
Adds flexibility to both productionand marketing
Improved ability to satisfy customerrequirements
5 - 21© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Using computers todesign products andprepare engineeringdocumentation
Shorter developmentcycles, improvedaccuracy, lower cost
Information anddesigns can bedeployed worldwide
Computer Aided Design(CAD)
24/11/2014
8
5 - 22© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Design for Manufacturing and Assembly(DFMA) Solve manufacturing problems during the
design stage 3-D Object Modeling
Small prototypedevelopment
CAD through theinternet
International dataexchange through STEP
Extensions of CAD
5 - 23© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Computer-AidedManufacturing (CAM)
Utilizing specialized computersand program to controlmanufacturing equipment
Often driven by the CAD system(CAD/CAM)
5 - 24© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
1. Product quality2. Shorter design time3. Production cost reductions4. Database availability5. New range of capabilities
Benefits of CAD/CAM
24/11/2014
9
5 - 25© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Virtual Reality Technology
Computer technology used todevelop an interactive, 3-D model ofa product from the basic CAD data
Allows people to ‘see’ the finisheddesign before a physical model isbuilt
Very effective in large-scale designssuch as plant layout
5 - 26© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Value Analysis
Focuses on design improvementduring production
Seeks improvements leading eitherto a better product or a productwhich can be produced moreeconomically with lessenvironmental impact
5 - 27© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Ethics, EnvironmentallyFriendly Designs, and
Sustainability It is possible to enhance productivity
and deliver goods and services in anenvironmentally and ethicallyresponsible manner
In OM, sustainability means ecologicalstability
Conservation and renewal of resourcesthrough the entire product life cycle
24/11/2014
10
5 - 28© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Ethics, EnvironmentallyFriendly Designs, and
Sustainability Design
Polyester film and shoes Production
Prevention in production andpackaging
Destruction Recycling in automobiles
5 - 29© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Ethical Approach
View product design from asystems perspective Inputs, processes, outputs Costs to the firm/costs to society
Consider the entire life cycle ofthe product
5 - 30© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Ethical Approach Goals
1. Developing safe end environmentallysound practices
2. Minimizing waste of resources3. Reducing environmental liabilities4. Increasing cost-effectiveness of
complying with environmentalregulations
5. Begin recognized as a goodcorporate citizen
24/11/2014
11
5 - 31© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Guidelines for EnvironmentallyFriendly Designs
1. Make products recyclable2. Use recycled materials3. Use less harmful ingredients4. Use lighter components5. Use less energy6. Use less material
5 - 32© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Time-Based Competition
Product life cycles are becomingshorter and the rate oftechnological change isincreasing
Developing new products fastercan result in a competitiveadvantage
5 - 33© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Acquiring Technology By Purchasing a Firm
Speeds development Issues concern the fit between the acquired
organization and product and the host Through Joint Ventures
Both organizations learn Risks are shared
Through Alliances Cooperative agreements between
independent organizations
24/11/2014
12
5 - 34© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Defining The Product
First definition is in terms offunctions
Rigorous specifications aredeveloped during the design phase
Manufactured products will have anengineering drawing
Bill of material (BOM) lists thecomponents of a product
5 - 35© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Engineering drawing Shows dimensions, tolerances, and
materials Shows codes for Group Technology
Bill of Material Lists components, quantities and
where used Shows product structure
Product Documents
5 - 36© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Engineering Drawings
Figure 5.8
24/11/2014
13
5 - 37© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Bills of MaterialBOM for Panel Weldment
NUMBER DESCRIPTION QTYA 60-71 PANEL WELDM’T 1
A 60-7 LOWER ROLLER ASSM. 1R 60-17 ROLLER 1R 60-428 PIN 1P 60-2 LOCKNUT 1A 60-72 GUIDE ASSM. REAR 1R 60-57-1 SUPPORT ANGLE 1A 60-4 ROLLER ASSM. 102-50-1150 BOLT 1A 60-73 GUIDE ASSM. FRONT 1A 60-74 SUPPORT WELDM’T 1R 60-99 WEAR PLATE 102-50-1150 BOLT 1 Figure 5.9 (a)
5 - 38© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Parts grouped into families withsimilar characteristics
Coding system describesprocessing and physicalcharacteristics
Part families can be producedin dedicated manufacturing cells
Group Technology
5 - 39© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Group Technology Scheme
Figure 5.10
(a) Ungrouped Parts(b) Grouped Cylindrical Parts (families of parts)
Grooved Slotted Threaded Drilled Machined
24/11/2014
14
5 - 40© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
1. Improved design2. Reduced raw material and purchases3. Simplified production planning and
control4. Improved layout, routing, and
machine loading5. Reduced tooling setup time, work-in-
process, and production time
Group Technology Benefits
5 - 41© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Documents for Production
Assembly drawing Assembly chart Route sheet Work order Engineering change notices (ECNs)
5 - 42© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Assembly Drawing
Shows explodedview of product
Details relativelocations toshow how toassemble theproduct
Figure 5.11 (a)
24/11/2014
15
5 - 43© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Assembly Chart1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
R 209 Angle
R 207 Angle
Bolts w/nuts (2)
R 209 Angle
R 207 Angle
Bolt w/nut
R 404 Roller
Lock washer
Part number tag
Box w/packing material
Bolts w/nuts (2)
SA1
SA2
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
Leftbracket
assembly
Rightbracket
assembly
Poka-yokeinspection
Figure 5.11 (b)
Identifies the point ofproduction wherecomponents flow intosubassemblies andultimately into thefinal product
5 - 44© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Route SheetLists the operations and times requiredto produce a component
Setup OperationProcess Machine Operations Time Time/Unit
1 Auto Insert 2 Insert Component 1.5 .4Set 56
2 Manual Insert Component .5 2.3Insert 1 Set 12C
3 Wave Solder Solder all 1.5 4.1componentsto board
4 Test 4 Circuit integrity .25 .5test 4GY
5 - 45© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Work OrderInstructions to produce a given quantityof a particular item, usually to a schedule
Work OrderItem Quantity Start Date Due Date
Production DeliveryDept Location
157C 125 5/2/08 5/4/08
F32 Dept K11
24/11/2014
16
5 - 46© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Engineering Change Notice(ECN)
A correction or modification to aproduct’s definition ordocumentation Engineering drawings Bill of material
Quite common with long product lifecycles, long manufacturing lead times, or
rapidly changing technologies
5 - 47© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Configuration Management
The need to manage ECNs has ledto the development of configurationmanagement systems
A product’s planned and changingcomponents are accuratelyidentified and control andaccountability for change areidentified and maintained
5 - 48© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Product Life-CycleManagement (PLM)
Integrated software that bringstogether most, if not all, elements ofproduct design and manufacture Product design CAD/CAM, DFMA Product routing Materials Assembly Environmental
24/11/2014
17
5 - 49© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Service Design Service typically includes direct
interaction with the customer Increased opportunity for customization Reduced productivity
Cost and quality are still determined atthe design stage Delay customization Modularization Reduce customer interaction, often
through automation
5 - 50© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Service Design
Figure 5.12
5 - 51© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Service Design
Figure 5.12
24/11/2014
18
5 - 52© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Application of DecisionTrees to Product Design
Particularly useful when there are aseries of decisions and outcomeswhich lead to other decisions andoutcomes
5 - 53© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Application of DecisionTrees to Product Design
1. Include all possible alternatives andstates of nature - including “doingnothing”
2. Enter payoffs at end of branch3. Determine the expected value of
each branch and “prune” the tree tofind the alternative with the bestexpected value
Procedures
5 - 54© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
(.6)
Low sales
(.4)
High sales
(.6) Low sales
(.4)
High sales
Decision Tree ExamplePurchase CAD
Hire and train engineers
Do nothing
Figure 5.14
24/11/2014
19
5 - 55© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
(.6) Low sales
(.4)
High sales
Decision Tree ExamplePurchase CAD
(.6)
Low sales
(.4)
High sales
Hire and train engineers
Do nothing
Figure 5.14
$2,500,000 Revenue- 1,000,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 25,000)
- 500,000 CAD cost$1,000,000 Net
$800,000 Revenue- 320,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)- 500,000 CAD cost- $20,000 Net loss
EMV (purchase CAD system) = (.4)($1,000,000) + (.6)(- $20,000)
5 - 56© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
(.6) Low sales
(.4)
High sales
Decision Tree ExamplePurchase CAD
(.6)
Low sales
(.4)
High sales
Hire and train engineers
Do nothing
Figure 5.14
$2,500,000 Revenue- 1,000,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 25,000)
- 500,000 CAD cost$1,000,000 Net
$800,000 Revenue- 320,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)- 500,000 CAD cost- $20,000 Net loss
EMV (purchase CAD system) = (.4)($1,000,000) + (.6)(- $20,000)= $388,000
$388,000
5 - 57© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
(.6)
Low sales
(.4)
High sales
(.6) Low sales
(.4)
High sales
Decision Tree ExamplePurchase CAD
$388,000
Hire and train engineers$365,000
Do nothing $0
$0 Net
$800,000 Revenue- 400,000 Mfg cost ($50 x 8,000)- 375,000 Hire and train cost
$25,000 Net
$2,500,000 Revenue- 1,250,000 Mfg cost ($50 x 25,000)
- 375,000 Hire and train cost$875,000 Net
$2,500,000 Revenue- 1,000,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 25,000)
- 500,000 CAD cost$1,000,000 Net
$800,000 Revenue- 320,000 Mfg cost ($40 x 8,000)- 500,000 CAD cost- $20,000 Net loss
Figure 5.14
24/11/2014
20
5 - 58© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Transition to Production Know when to move to production
Product development can be viewed asevolutionary and never complete
Product must move from design toproduction in a timely manner
Most products have a trial productionperiod to insure producibility Develop tooling, quality control, training Ensures successful production
5 - 59© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Transition to Production Responsibility must also transition as the
product moves through its life cycle Line management takes over from design
Three common approaches to managingtransition Project managers Product development teams Integrate product development and
manufacturing organizations