+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

Date post: 05-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: saleh-hayek
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 18

Transcript
  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    1/18

    Fatigue

    Part 2

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    2/18

    6-8 Fatigue Strength : Basics

    Low-cycle fatigue considers the range fromN=1 to about 1000 cycles.

    In this region, the fatigue strength is only

    slightly smaller than the tensile strength .

    High-cycle fatigue domain extends from 103

    to the endurance limit life (106 to 107 cycles).

    Experience has shown that high-cycle fatigue

    data are rectified by a logarithmic transform

    to both stress and cycles-to-failure.

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    3/18

    Fatigue Strength at Different

    N Define the fatigue strength at a specified number of cycles as

    By combining the elastic strain relations, we can get

    Define fas the fraction of tensile strength. The value offat 103 cycles isthen

    To find b, substitute the endurance strength and the corresponding cyclesand solving for b as

    For example, for steels when

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    4/18

    Fatigue Strength : General

    For actual mechanical applications, the fatigue strength

    calculated above is extended to a more general form as

    : cycle to failure

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    5/18

    Endurance Limit Modifying

    Factors The endurance limit of the rotating-beam specimen might differ from

    the actual application due to the following differences fromlaboratory tests.

    Material : composition, basis of failure, variability

    Manufacturing : method, heat treatment, fretting corrosion, surface

    condition, stress concentration

    Environment : corrosion, temperature, stress state, relaxation times.

    Design : size, shape, life, stress state, stress concentration, speed,fretting, galling

    Modifying factors ofsurface condition, size, loading, temperature,and miscellaneous items are proposed by Marin to quantify thesedifferences.

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    6/18

    Marin Modification Factors on

    Endurance Limit

    where

    = surface condition modification factor = size modification factor

    = load modification factor

    = temperature modification factor

    = reliability factor

    = miscellaneous-effects modification factor

    = rotary-beam test specimen endurance limit

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    7/18

    Surface and Loading Factors

    Surface Factor : the surface modification factor depends on thequality of the finish of the actual part surface and on the tensilestrength of the part material. It can be calculated as

    Loading Factor : the axial and torsional loadings results in differentendurance limit than that of a standard rotating-bending test. Theload factor applies to other loading conditions as

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    8/18

    Size Factor

    Size Factor : the size factor has been evaluated using 133 set

    of data points in the literature. For axial loading, . Forbending and torsion can be expressed as

    Effective dimension is introduced for non-circular cross sectionby equating the volume of the material stressed at and above95 percent of the maximum stress to the same volume in therotating-beam specimen.

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    9/18

    Temperature Factor

    At temperatures lower thanroom temperature, brittle

    fracture of a component

    needs to be considered first;

    at operating temperatureshigher than room

    temperature, yield should be

    investigated.

    If only tensile-strength data

    are available, polynomial

    fitting to the data could

    provide the temperature

    Fig.2-9 : yield stress drops with

    temperature

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    10/18

    Reliability Factor

    Most endurance strength data arereported as mean values.

    To account for the scatter of measurement

    data, the reliability modification factor iswritten as

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    11/18

    Miscellaneous-Effects Factor

    The miscellaneous factor intends toaccount for the reduction in endurance

    limit due to all other effects, such as

    residual stresses, different material

    treatments, directional characteristics of

    operations, and corrosion.

    One should also treat the miscellaneous-

    effect factor as a reminder that these must

    accounted for, because actual values of

    are not always available.

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    12/18

    Fatigue Stress

    Concentration Factor

    The fatigue stress concentration factorfrom the existence of irregularities or

    discontinuities in materials is defined a

    Let be the static stressconcentration factor, the relations

    between fatigue stress concentration

    and the notch sensitivity is

    for bending and axial loadings

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    13/18

    Characterizing Fluctuating

    Stresses

    Fluctuating stressesoften of sinusoidalpatters due to thenature of somerotating machinery.

    The peaks of the waveare more importantthan its shape.

    Fluctuating stressesare described using asteady componentand an alternating

    component.

    F ti F il C it i f

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    14/18

    Fatigue Failure Criteria for

    Fluctuating Stresses

    Gerber

    modified Goodman

    Soldergerg

    ASME-elliptic

    Langer

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    15/18

    Combination of Load Modes

    Fatigue problems can be categorized into- completely reversing simple loads : can be handled using S-N curve; only one type of

    loading is allowed with midrange stress being zero.

    - fluctuating simple loads : can be resolved using a criterion to relate midrange and

    alternating stresses; again, only one type of loading is allowed.

    - combinations of loading modes : a combinations of different types of loading.

    apply appropriate stress concentration factors to each type ofstress

    calculate equivalent von Mises stress

    select a fatigue failure criteriondiscard the load factor for torsional stress, consider axial stress

    only.

    C bi ti f B di

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    16/18

    Combination of Bending,

    Torsion, and Axial Stressesapply appropriate stress concentration factors to each type of stress

    calculate equivalent von Mises stress

    select a fatigue failure criterion

    discard the load factor for torsional stress, consider axial stressonly.

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    17/18

    Varying, Fluctuating Stresses

    Instead of a single fully reversed stresshistory block composed of n cycles,

    suppose a machine part, at a critical

    location is subjected to.

    A fully reversed stress for cycles, for cycles, ..., or

    A wiggly time line of stress exhibiting many and different peaks and

    valleys.

  • 8/2/2019 6 3 2012, Fatigue Part 2

    18/18

    Cumulative Fatigue Damage

    The Palmgren-Miner cycle-ratiosummation rule uses linear damage

    accumulation concept as

    : the number of cycles at stress level : the number of cycles to failure at stress level

    : the parameter determined by experiment, in the range

    with an average value near unity


Recommended