#6 SUSB Expo 2014 FAA

Federal Aviation Administration

Integration of Civil Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) into the National Airspace System (NAS): A Discussion about Risk

Presented to: sUSB Exposition By: Jim Williams, Manager, FAA, UAS Integration Office, AFS-80 Date: May 8, 2014

132 Federal Aviation Administration

sUSB Exposition May 8, 2014

FAA.gov/about/initiatives/uas

Bull Run Incident – Virginia




Endure Batavia Triathlon Incident – Australia




Near-Mid Air Collision Incident – Florida

Model Aircraft Similar to One in Incident

•  A near mid-air collision was reported to Tallahassee Air Traffic Control on March 22 by Bluestreak Airlines (US Airways commuter) –  Pilot passed an unreported and apparently remotely controlled

aircraft at 2300 ft., five miles northeast of Tallahassee –  Described as a camouflaged F-4 fixed wing aircraft

•  Small, but not a quadcopter or rotorcraft –  Commuter Captain thought the model aircraft may have

collided with his aircraft •  Inspection after landing revealed no damage




See and Avoid




ASTM Small Unmanned Aircraft System Standards

1. Specification for Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM) (F2908)

2. Practice for Maintenance and Continued Airworthiness (F2909)

3. Specification for Design and Construction (F2910) 4. Practice for Production Acceptance (F2911) 5. Specification for Design of the Command and

Control System (F3002) 6. Specification for Quality Assurance (F3003) 7. Specification for Batteries (F3005)




•  Background –  Raphael Pirker fined $10,000 for “reckless and careless” operation

of a UAS following commercial filming at the University of Virginia, 2011

•  Legal Actions –  National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) judge dismissed

case on March 6, 2014 –  FAA appealing decision to full NTSB panel

•  Judge’s decision stayed, pending NTSB review •  Impact

–  Media coverage has portrayed the Pirker case as a nullification of FAA authority to regulate commercial UAS operations

–  Increase of news reports of unauthorized commercial operations •  Response

–  FAA preparing a public notice to clarify our oversight authority in this area

Raphael Pirker Case




Small UAS Rule •  Key initiative for

introducing commercial UAS operations safely into the NAS –  Plan to release Notice of

Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in late 2014

–  Small commercial UAS projected to be largest growth sector




FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA): Section 333

FILMING - POWER LINE INSPECTION - PRECISION AGRICULTURE - FLARE STACK INSPECTION




Arctic First Authorized Commercial Flight of Small UAS




Thank You




Backup




Code of Federal Regulations Section 91.111 Operating Near Other Aircraft. (a)  No person may operate an aircraft so close to another aircraft as to

create a collision hazard. (b)  No person may operate an aircraft information flight except by

arrangement with the pilot in command of each aircraft in formation. (c)  No person may operate an aircraft, carrying passengers for hire, in

formation flight.




Code of Federal Regulations Section 91.113 Right-of-way rules: Except water operations.

(a)  Inapplicability. This section does not apply to the operation of an aircraft on water. (b)  General. When weather conditions permit, regardless of whether an operation is conducted under instrument flight rules or

visual flight rules, vigilance shall be maintained by each person operating an aircraft so as to see and avoid other aircraft. When a rule of this section gives another aircraft the right-of-way, the pilot shall give way to that aircraft and may not pass over, under, or ahead of it unless well clear.

(c)  In distress. An aircraft in distress has the right-of-way over all other air traffic. (d)  Converging. When aircraft of the same category are converging at approximately the same altitude (except head-on, or

nearly so), the aircraft to the other's right has the right-of-way. If the aircraft are of different categories-- (1) A balloon has the right-of-way over any other category of aircraft; [(2) A glider has the right-of-way over an airship, powered parachute, weight-shift-control aircraft, airplane, or rotorcraft. (3) An airship has the right-of-way over a powered parachute, weight-shift-control aircraft, airplane, or rotorcraft.]

However, an aircraft towing or refueling other aircraft has the right-of-way over all other engine-driven aircraft. (e) Approaching head-on. When aircraft are approaching each other head-on, or nearly so, each pilot of each aircraft shall

alter course to the right. (f) Overtaking. Each aircraft that is being overtaken has the right-of-way and each pilot of an overtaking aircraft shall alter

course to the right to pass well clear. (g) Landing. Aircraft, while on final approach to land or while landing, have the right-of-way over other aircraft in flight or

operating on the surface, except that they shall not take advantage of this rule to force an aircraft off the runway surface which has already landed and is attempting to make way for an aircraft on final approach. When two or more aircraft are approaching an airport for the purpose of landing, the aircraft at the lower altitude has the right-of-way, but it shall not take advantage of this rule to cut in front of another which is on final approach to land or to overtake that aircraft.




Section 333 of the FMRA •  SEC. 333. SPECIAL RULES FOR CERTAIN UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS. (a)

IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act.

•  (b) ASSESSMENT OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS.— In making the determination under subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum— (1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national security; and (2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1). (c) REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFE OPERATION.— If the Secretary determines under this section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.

Date post:	11-Jun-2015
Category:	Technology
Upload:	suas-news
View:	116 times
Download:	0 times

#6 SUSB Expo 2014 FAA

Technology