Date post: | 27-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | alexandra-petraru |
View: | 165 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Assignment 2 Barcelona Brasilia Karlsruhe Letchworth Palmanova
Urban fabric
-repeatability of urban isles which seemdull and hard to individualize-interior courts that leave room forpersonalized use- they give the specific of the area (theunexpected thrill of the search)-traffic, sunlight and ventilation weretaken into account- beveled corners which create theopportunity of larger public spaces atevery intersection, probably alsoinfluencing the way the space isperceived in terms of orientation.
-functional districts which areperpendicular on the city axis-community activities are not a mainconcern-good connectivity for federal affairs-large empty spaces which act as asymbol, enhancing the impact ofarchitectural objects-no industry or other form ofproduction does not create the needfor expansion
-The fan shaped initial panning of thecity degrades itself while movingaway from the core- The new lots still keep somecharacteristics of the urban isles, butdo not thoroughly respect the fabric-they move their public spacetowards the exterior, instead ofisolating it inside-weak limits consisting oftransportation and green areas thatcan allow further development
-miming organic development at a firstglance-nature integrated as an essential partof urban planning-high focus on social infrastructure andhigh living standards for individuals interms of space, distribution and comfortstreet conditions.-industry, separated but highlyaccessible, is the work nucleus thatmakes Letchworth urban rather thancountryside.-clear separation between the servicepole and the living areas
-Strong boundaries-star shaped plan with a radial andconcentric development-housing arranged to follow the roadline-gathering space in the center-no other functions, except living anddefense
Road distributionand "ViaTriumphalis"
-Via de los Corts Catalanes acts as abarrier between Eixample and the oldcity-it distinguishes itself through size-it serves mostly for transit-the rest of the streets are identical, laiddown after a strict rectangular plan
-The main road is a metaphor forsymbolism-it connecting the railway station to theNational Congress Building-it acts as a traffic aggregator-it has no community infrastructure-the road system is perpendicular tothis axis and acts as a trafficdistributor
-Via Triumphalis, an axis thatprovides access to the palace andthe city’s most important buildings-the road system started as a strictfan shape, but it evolved differently intime
Green spaces have different roles:Green belts-visual, acoustic and theoreticalinsulation from the exterior of the city-physical limit, boundary that does notallow urban sprawlPublic parks and squares-space for communityPrivate gardens-re-creating the green oasis from thecountrysideLarge green areas-either community parks (with noplanned areas) or private spaces forgolf courses and other leisure facilities.
-access in the city is not hierarchisedaccording to points of interest-access points in order to ensureprotection in strategic points-the main road is substituted by themain square that has the role of theancient agora.
Green spaces
-green spaces used to markintersections-the community spaces mostlyconsisting in the interior courts of isles,where people individualized space-not all initial plans were respected,hence no parks
- green spaces emphasize thearchitectural objects- they do not provide for community,except the spaces in the housingareas which, as history has proved,does not necessary increase theurban comfort in free-plan areas.-other green spaces are residual
-the main planned green spacesurrounding the Palace, symbolizingthe architectural object-it also expands the final point of themain urban axis.-other green spaces are subdued tourban isles-planned parks try to addresscommunity needs.
Green spaces have different roles:Green belts-visual, acoustic and theoreticalinsulation from the exterior of the city-physical limit, boundary that does notallow urban sprawlPublic parks and squares-space for communityPrivate gardens-re-creating the green oasis from thecountrysideLarge green areas-either community parks (with noplanned areas) or private spaces forgolf courses and other leisure facilities.
-green spaces used as a defensemechanism, an intermediary spacebetween the living area and thefortress-green spaces inside the town areresidual in nature
Main functionsthat influenceddevelopment
-built in the 19th century as an extensionto the city-Cerda wanted Eixample to be an all-class aggregator neighbourhood,providing all types of services for anormal life-it however, became a living place forthe wealthy
-mid XXth century urban development-strongly focused on creating a federaldistrict -approached urban planning asa circulation node and public spacesas a compliment to the nationalimportance of its function.
-developed around the KarlsruhePalace-further generated its expansion as aJustice district-influenced urban planning bycreating symbolic axes and importantpublic buildings as nodes.
-developed in 1903 as EbenizerHoward’s first garden-city, Letchworthwas planned as an ideal industrial city.-although industry was the mainfunction, a greater focus was put inproviding high standard living topeople.-the most well-known working citygarden, with urban politics applied tothis day so as to promote this model
-built in the 16th century as a defensecity, Palmanova has the militaryfunction strongly embedded into itsurban planning-urban extensions by addingconcentric walls also ensured betterdefense-population was self-sustainable,generating no need for other facilities-only military in purpose, the city diedafter it became obsolete
Team #642 - Assignment 2 - Planned cities
Socialinfrastructure
-the community spaces designed byCerda were not respected-interior courts are used as communityspaces-intersections are subdued to trafficneeds rather than social needs-services included in the urban plans-no distinct leisure area
-no community spaces-central area not dedicated to socialpurposes-symbolic green spaces-overwhelming traffic-the free-plan urbanism adopted forhousing districts has proved to notprovide proper comfort levels
-seems to not be a flagrant mistakenor a good example for responding tosocial needs-it provides no connection to thewater for leisure activities
- centralized activity poles: living,services, leisure and industry.-well-known gathering places-closed community-Urban politics that advocate for thegarden city model-urban politics that involve community-high comfort levels for living
-no interest in community, except formanifestations in the main square-a model that did not function when itsmain purpose became obsolete –which shows the lack of response tosocial needs
LETCHWORTH - Is a good social infrastructure enough for development?
One of the main reasons I’m considering that Letchworth has a good social infrastructure is because it was built upon an utopist model and, to this day, it functions the way it was supposed to. Moreover, the original idea was however centered on community and on creating the best conditions for life.
Paradoxically, it functions on a functional segregation that has proven to be the death (symbolically) of larger cities. Here, the large living areas are separated from the service pole, the industrial area, the administrative sector. Sure, we must certainly take into account the small, controlled size of the urban development, but at the end of the day, the layout of the city gathers all citizens in the same place. People seem to end up socializing involuntarily.
I considered Broadway to be a sort of “Via Triumphalis” because, although it has no role in connecting Letchworth to other nearby urban structures, it is the center of the community life. It acts as an aggregator for the living areas, directing the people �ow towards the service pole. It is the only street treated as a symbol (the park in the middle, the systematic shift in sizes, even the presence of the �rst roundabout in England). Moreover, it gathers many important services such as a school, a park, a hotel, a library, etc.
The layout of green spaces from a social point is quite interesting here. In major cities, the main attraction would be a large green area in the city center which would be used as leisure zone. Since the town provides each inhabitant with a su�cient amount of green space, the service pole has become the main social interest and other green spaces are pushed away towards the outskirts (being almost integrated into the green belts) providing for other types of leisure activities (golf etc.)
Urban politics are always community centered, from archeological activities to implementing a sustainable policy among the city’s use to new investors. The local art scene became regional, Letchworth citizens are active in online environments. It seems that, in a way, Letchworth is moving forward, it adapts to the new economy, to the cyberspace, to almost everything our world is going towards. However, they are still a closed community that constantly advocate for their model of urban planning.
I brought this into discussion because the Letchworth model looks like a model designed to work in con�ned spaces, in small communities that are controllable and predictable. Its utopia started from combining a rural environment with city life (considered as such probably because of the shift in production means, from agriculture to industry). However, more than 100 years later, can this still be considered an urban environment? Can a good social infrastructure like this expand (as principles) on a larger scale or it would just be overwhelmed by mere size?
Sport facilities
Service pole
Industry
Living areas
Broadway -people �ow andservice aggregator