+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 65 metropolitan districts 12 states 49 clusters account ... · McKinsey, titled ‘India’s...

65 metropolitan districts 12 states 49 clusters account ... · McKinsey, titled ‘India’s...

Date post: 28-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
A report from McKinsey examines how India’s economic landscape will change over the coming decade. Based on the assumption that yearly growth will average at least 6.4 per cent, the report projects that eight “high per- forming” states, namely, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Kerala, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Uttarakhand, will together account for 52 per cent of incremental gross domestic product (GDP) growth from 2012 to 2025. Disaggregating the data, the report identifies 49 metropolitan clusters which are likely to account for 77 per cent of India’s incremental GDP from 2012 to 2025. By 2025, these clusters are expected to be home to 72 per cent of the consuming class and 73 per cent of the income pool. Trends in two states stand out. According to the findings, Punjab’s growth is likely to moderate, based on current momen- tum. Its per capita GDP will move closer to India’s average, thereby shifting it to the category of “performing” states in 2025. Interestingly, Madhya Pradesh’s high growth momentum is expected to push it into the category of “performing” states. By 2025, states classified in the “performing” category are likely to mirror today’s “high performing” states in terms of per capita GDP. For example, West Bengal’s per capita GDP in 2025 is likely to reach that of Maharashtra today. The report estimates that by 2025, 38 per cent of India will be urbanised, up from 31 per cent in 2011. Of the eight high performing states, four are likely to be more than 50 per cent urbanised by this time. This urbanisation and the associated income growth is likely to propel “high performing” states to income levels currently enjoyed by global middle-income countries. For example, the 128 million residing in Maharashtra are likely to have purchasing parity similar to that of Brazil today. Households in Delhi are likely to have a standard of living comparable to Russia, while Goa and Chandigarh will mirror Spain. By 2025, 57 per cent, or 51 million of India’s 89 million con- suming class households (those earning above ~4.85 lakh a year) will be concentrated in “very high performing” and “high performing” states, up from 16 million in 2012. While these projections are based on annual growth averag- ing 6.4 per cent over the decade, a word of caution is in order. In the absence of wide-ranging reforms to tackle systemic issues and continued pressure on both the current account and fiscal deficits, annual growth is expected to be lower at around 5.2 per cent, which will negatively impact these projections. ISHAN BAKSHI 49 city clusters to drive growth India’s growth may have slumped over the past few years, but there are signs of a recovery beginning to take shape. If growth averages 6-7 per cent annually over the coming decade, how will it transform the economy? How different will the India of 2025 be from the India of 2014, considering that the India of 2014 is vastly different from the India of 2004. A new report from McKinsey, titled ‘India’s economic geography in 2025: states, clusters and cities’, looks at how the next decade will unfold ! 65 metropolitan districts account for 26% of population, 45% of consuming class households, 40% of GDP and 37% of consumption ! 79 metropolitan districts spread across 427,000 km provide same economic opportunity as 8 high performing states spread across 794,000 km METROS HOLD THE KEY ! 12 states which are very high and high performing make up 50% of GDP and 58% of consuming class households ! 8 states which are high performing will contribute 52% of incremental GDP STATES DIFFER IN GROWTH ! 49 clusters contribute 70% of GDP ! 49 clusters account for 77%of incremental GDP; 21 clusters home to 44%of consuming class households CONCENTRATION OF WEALTH 2025 2012 THE INDIA OF 2025 . < 2012 49 Rest of 2025 clusters India 87,41.64 77,87.38 (23%) 23,14.28 188,43.29 These 49 clusters will provide access to 77% of India’s incremental GDP through 2025 Clusters’ GDP (~ ‘000 crore, 2012 prices); figures in brackets show contribution to India’s incremental GDP Of the 49 metropolitan clusters with distinct local economies, 29 are situated in ‘performing’ and ‘low performing’ states Clusters comprise metropolitan districts and adjoining high potential districts LOCATION OF 49 METROPOLITAN CLUSTERS * ACROSS STATES Rural (<15% urbanised) # Transition (15-35% urbanised) Semi Urban (35-60% urbanised) Urban (>60% urbanised) Very high performing 1. Delhi 2. Chandigarh 3. Goa 4. Puducherry High performing 5. Mumbai 6. Chennai 7. Ahmedabad 8. Surat 9. Coimbatore 10. Kochi 11. Nagpur 12. Rajkot 13. Ludhiana 14. Nashik 15. Thiruvananthapuram 16. Tiruchirappalli 17. Aurangabad 18. Madurai 19. Solapur 20. Kozhikode Performing 21. Kolkata 22. Bangalore 23. Hyderabad 24. Visakhapatnam 25. Vijayawada 26. Jaipur 27. Kadapa 28. Adilabad 29. Nellore 30. Bhubaneswar 31. Jodhpur 32. Raipur 33. Bikaner 34. Hubli-Dharwad 35. Udaipur 36. Amritsar 37. Kota Low performing 38. Jamshedpur 39. Lucknow 40. Saharanpur 41. Jabalpur 42. Indore 43. Bareilly 44. Agra 45. Ranchi 46. Varanasi 47. Patna 48. Bhopal 49. Gwalior By 2025, the standard of living in ‘very high’ and ‘high performing’ states will mirror that of high and middle-income nations today Source: McKinsey’s India’s economic geography in 2025: states, clusters and cities Twenty-one ‘high growth-high affluence’ clusters will provide access to 47 per cent of India’s income pool in 2025 and 44 per cent of its consuming class CLUSTERS INCOME POOL BY 4 QUADRANTS (~’000 crore, 2012 prices) High growth- 30,46.3 7.0 47 44 21 high affluence 73,71.3 Moderate growth- 9,84.8 5.6 13 15 10 high affluence 19,94 High growth- 2,78.5 7.0 4 4 6 moderate affluence 6,72.6 Moderate growth- 7,29.1 5.4 9 9 12 moderate affluence 14,44.5 Classification based on how clusters stack up to India average on 2025 per capita income and GDP growth rate (2012-25) % % SHARE OF CONTRIBUTION INDIA’S GROWTH TO INDIA’S CONSUMING NO. OF ! 2012 ! 2025 P.A (%) INCOME, ‘25 CLASS, 2025 CLUSTERS Twenty-one clusters are likely to be more affluent and grow faster than India Clusters’ matrix on GDP growth and richness High growth-high affluence (21) Moderate growth- high affluence (10) High growth-moderate affluence (6) Moderate growth- moderate affluence (12) Size of the bubble is no. of households, 2025, in million (ranging from 0.4-13.0 million) By 2025, eight of 12 ‘very high’ and ‘high performing’ states will be on average 55% urbanised * Amritsar, Patna, Bhopal, Kota and Gwalior are single district clusters; # Based on 2025 urbanisation rate. Very high performing are those with average per capita GDP greater than two times India’s average GDP per capita; high performing are those with average per capita GDP between 1.2 and two times India’s average GDP per capita; low performing are those with average per capita GDP less than 0.7 times India’s average GDP per capita (77%) Figures in brackets mean number of quadrants Compiled by Ishan Bakshi; Desk: Abhik Sen; Design: Jayant Das; Graphics: Neeraj Tiwari, Tarun Sehgal and Retnakumar
Transcript
Page 1: 65 metropolitan districts 12 states 49 clusters account ... · McKinsey, titled ‘India’s economic geography in 2025: states, clusters and cities’, looks at how the next decade

Areport from McKinsey examines how India’seconomic landscape will change over thecoming decade. Based on the assumptionthat yearly growth will average at least 6.4 percent, the report projects that eight “high per-forming” states, namely, Gujarat, Haryana,Himachal Pradesh, Kerala, Maharashtra,

Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Uttarakhand, will togetheraccount for 52 per cent of incremental gross domestic product(GDP) growth from 2012 to 2025. Disaggregating the data, thereport identifies 49 metropolitan clusters which are likely toaccount for 77 per cent of India’s incremental GDP from 2012 to2025. By 2025, these clusters are expected to be home to 72 percent of the consuming class and 73 per cent of the income pool.

Trends in two states stand out. According to the findings,Punjab’s growth is likely to moderate, based on current momen-tum. Its per capita GDP will move closer to India’s average,thereby shifting it to the category of “performing” states in2025. Interestingly, Madhya Pradesh’s high growth momentumis expected to push it into the category of “performing” states.

By 2025, states classified in the “performing” category arelikely to mirror today’s “high performing” states in terms of percapita GDP. For example, West Bengal’s per capita GDP in 2025

is likely to reach that of Maharashtra today. The report estimates that by 2025, 38 per cent of India will

be urbanised, up from 31 per cent in 2011. Of the eight highperforming states, four are likely to be more than 50 per centurbanised by this time. This urbanisation and the associatedincome growth is likely to propel “high performing” states toincome levels currently enjoyed by global middle-incomecountries. For example, the 128 million residing inMaharashtra are likely to have purchasing parity similar tothat of Brazil today. Households in Delhi are likely to have astandard of living comparable to Russia, while Goa andChandigarh will mirror Spain.

By 2025, 57 per cent, or 51 million of India’s 89 million con-suming class households (those earning above ~4.85 lakh ayear) will be concentrated in “very high performing” and “highperforming” states, up from 16 million in 2012.

While these projections are based on annual growth averag-ing 6.4 per cent over the decade, a word of caution is in order. Inthe absence of wide-ranging reforms to tackle systemic issuesand continued pressure on both the current account and fiscaldeficits, annual growth is expected to be lower at around 5.2 percent, which will negatively impact these projections.

ISHAN BAKSHI

49 city clustersto drive growthIndia’s growth may have slumped over the past few years, but there aresigns of a recovery beginning to take shape. If growth averages 6-7 per centannually over the coming decade, how will it transform the economy? Howdifferent will the India of 2025 be from the India of 2014, considering thatthe India of 2014 is vastly different from the India of 2004. A new report fromMcKinsey, titled ‘India’s economic geography in 2025: states, clusters andcities’, looks at how the next decade will unfold

! 65 metropolitan districtsaccount for 2266%% of population, 4455%% of consuming classhouseholds, 4400%% of GDP and 3377%% of consumption

! 79 metropolitan districtsspread across 442277,,000000 kkmm provide same economic opportunityas 8 high performing states spread across 779944,,000000 kkmm

METROS HOLD THE KEY

! 12 states which are very high and high performing make up5500%% of GDP and 5588%% of consuming class households

! 8 stateswhich are high performing will contribute 5522%% of incremental GDP

STATES DIFFER IN GROWTH

! 49 clusters contribute 7700%% of GDP

! 49 clustersaccount for 7777%%of incremental GDP; 2211 clustershome to 4444%%of consuming class households

CONCENTRATION OF WEALTH

2025

2012

THE INDIA OF 2025 . <

2012 49 Rest of 2025clusters India

87,41.64

77,87.38 (23%)

23,14.28

188,43.29

These 49 clusterswill provideaccess to 77% of India’sincremental GDPthrough 2025Clusters’ GDP (~ ‘000 crore,2012 prices); figures in bracketsshow contribution to India’sincremental GDP

Of the 49 metropolitan clusterswith distinct local economies, 29 are situated in ‘performing’and ‘low performing’ states

Clusters comprise metropolitan districts andadjoining high potential districts

LOCATION OF 49 METROPOLITAN CLUSTERS* ACROSS STATES

Rural (<15% urbanised)#

Transition (15-35% urbanised)

Semi Urban (35-60% urbanised)

Urban (>60% urbanised)

Veryhigh performing1. Delhi 2. Chandigarh 3. Goa 4. Puducherry

High performing

5. Mumbai

6. Chennai

7. Ahmedabad

8. Surat

9. Coimbatore

10. Kochi

11. Nagpur

12. Rajkot13. Ludhiana14. Nashik15. Thiruvananthapuram16. Tiruchirappalli17. Aurangabad18. Madurai19. Solapur20. Kozhikode

Performing

21. Kolkata22. Bangalore23. Hyderabad24. Visakhapatnam25. Vijayawada26. Jaipur27. Kadapa28. Adilabad

29. Nellore

30. Bhubaneswar

31. Jodhpur

32. Raipur

33. Bikaner

34. Hubli-Dharwad

35. Udaipur

36. Amritsar

37. Kota

Lowperforming

38. Jamshedpur

39. Lucknow

40. Saharanpur

41. Jabalpur

42. Indore

43. Bareilly44. Agra45. Ranchi46. Varanasi47. Patna48. Bhopal49. Gwalior

By 2025, the standard of living in‘very high’ and ‘high performing’states will mirror that of high andmiddle-income nations today

Source: McKinsey’s India’s economic geography in 2025: states, clusters and cities

Twenty-one ‘high growth-high affluence’ clusters willprovide access to 47 per cent of India’s income pool in 2025and 44 per cent of its consuming class

CLUSTERS INCOME POOL BY 4 QUADRANTS (~’000 crore, 2012 prices)

High growth- 30,46.3 7.0 47 44 21high affluence

73,71.3

Moderate growth- 9,84.85.6 13 15 10high affluence

19,94

High growth- 2,78.57.0 4 4 6moderate affluence

6,72.6

Moderate growth- 7,29.15.4 9 9 12moderate affluence

14,44.5

Classification based on how clusters stack up to India average on 2025 per capita income and GDP growth rate (2012-25)

% % SHARE OF

CONTRIBUTION INDIA’S

GROWTH TO INDIA’S CONSUMING NO. OF

! 2012 ! 2025 P.A (%) INCOME, ‘25 CLASS, 2025 CLUSTERS

Twenty-one clusters are likely to be more affluent andgrow faster than IndiaClusters’ matrix on GDP growth and richness

High growth-high affluence (21)

Moderate growth- high affluence (10) High growth-moderate affluence (6)

Moderate growth- moderate affluence (12) Size of the bubble is no. ofhouseholds, 2025, in million(ranging from 0.4-13.0 million)

By 2025,eight of 12‘very high’and ‘highperforming’states will beon average55%urbanised

* Amritsar, Patna, Bhopal, Kota and Gwalior are single district clusters; # Based on 2025 urbanisation rate. Very high performing are those with average per capita GDPgreater than two times India’s average GDP per capita; high performing are those with average per capita GDP between 1.2 and two times India’s average GDP percapita; low performing are those with average per capita GDP less than 0.7 times India’s average GDP per capita

(77%)

Figures in brackets mean number of quadrants

Compiled by Ishan Bakshi; Desk: Abhik Sen; Design: Jayant Das; Graphics: Neeraj Tiwari, Tarun Sehgal and Retnakumar

Recommended