Date post: | 06-Jul-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | denise-subramaniam |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/17/2019 7-12 Exhibit G to Writ: LNV's Fake Subramaniam Note
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/7-12-exhibit-g-to-writ-lnvs-fake-subramaniam-note 1/7
Case: 15-35963, 03/31/2016, ID: 9922316, DktEntry: 7-12, Page 1 of 7
8/17/2019 7-12 Exhibit G to Writ: LNV's Fake Subramaniam Note
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/7-12-exhibit-g-to-writ-lnvs-fake-subramaniam-note 2/7
Case: 15-35963, 03/31/2016, ID: 9922316, DktEntry: 7-12, Page 2 of 7
8/17/2019 7-12 Exhibit G to Writ: LNV's Fake Subramaniam Note
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/7-12-exhibit-g-to-writ-lnvs-fake-subramaniam-note 3/7
A high resolution close-up photo at 25% its full image size of Denise Subramaniam’s
initials on Page 3 of LNV’s purported “original” note is shown here. A highresolution close-up of this same initial at approximately 70% of its full size is on page
6 of this document.
Case: 15-35963, 03/31/2016, ID: 9922316, DktEntry: 7-12, Page 3 of 7
8/17/2019 7-12 Exhibit G to Writ: LNV's Fake Subramaniam Note
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/7-12-exhibit-g-to-writ-lnvs-fake-subramaniam-note 4/7
Case: 15-35963, 03/31/2016, ID: 9922316, DktEntry: 7-12, Page 4 of 7
8/17/2019 7-12 Exhibit G to Writ: LNV's Fake Subramaniam Note
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/7-12-exhibit-g-to-writ-lnvs-fake-subramaniam-note 5/7
Case: 15-35963, 03/31/2016, ID: 9922316, DktEntry: 7-12, Page 5 of 7
Close-up of the questionedendorsement. Notice that the "S"on People's is cut off. This isanother indication that this was
digitally copied and pasted.
8/17/2019 7-12 Exhibit G to Writ: LNV's Fake Subramaniam Note
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/7-12-exhibit-g-to-writ-lnvs-fake-subramaniam-note 6/7
This high resolution close-up photograph of Denise Subramaniam’s initials on Page 3
of LNV’s purported “original” note shows evidence of digital alteration with a
graphic software application like Adobe PhotoShop©
At this close-up high resolution you can clearly see the black outline surrounding the
blue color on the purported “original” Subramaniam initials.
The black outline around the letters is evidence of digital altering of a black and white photocopy by
filling the inside of the lines that make up the signature with a blue color then printing the color
enhanced digital alteration (forgery) with a color printer. This almost iridescent shade of blue is not
commonly found in pen ink.
Additional evidence that LNV’s purported “original” Note is a forgery is apparent in high resolution
photographs of page 4 where the pressure indent can be seen on the back of the page with the Dana
Lantry signature. No such pressure indent exists on the back side of any other signature or initial on the
instrument.
A pressure indent on the signature is difficult to capture in a photo. The print from the opposite side of
the page shows through too but the pressure indent is seen by the subtle shadows above and below the
pen loop where the arrow points. At the angle that the paper was held the lighting catches on the top (is
lighter) and creates a shadow below the pen stroke. It is very subtle in the photo but was completely
visible with the naked eye.
On the following page is the back side of the page with my signature held at about the same angle.
You can see some of the print from the opposite side of the page showing through like you see with
the lines and print around the Dana Lantry signature. But no pressure indent can been seen.
Shadow
Shadow
Light
Light
Light
Case: 15-35963, 03/31/2016, ID: 9922316, DktEntry: 7-12, Page 6 of 7
8/17/2019 7-12 Exhibit G to Writ: LNV's Fake Subramaniam Note
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/7-12-exhibit-g-to-writ-lnvs-fake-subramaniam-note 7/7
My signature is visible here showing through from the other side. But there are no shadows from a
pressure indent so you don’t see it as clearly as with the reverse side of the Dana Lantry signature
The most likely reason this one signature has a pressure indent when no others do is that a Beal
employee made the Dana Lantry signature recently with a pen – sometime shortly before November 2014
when LNV filed its foreclosure complaint but after May 2013 when Judge Mosman dismissed
Subramaniam’s case against LNV, Beal, MGC, Litton, GMAC-RFC, Homecomings, JPMorgan Chaseas successor to Bear Stearns, EMC and others.
Case: 15-35963, 03/31/2016, ID: 9922316, DktEntry: 7-12, Page 7 of 7