+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 7 CONCLUSION - WordPress.com · réussi” Maurice Druon, Le pouvoir (1965). 2Hutt News, 3 November...

7 CONCLUSION - WordPress.com · réussi” Maurice Druon, Le pouvoir (1965). 2Hutt News, 3 November...

Date post: 21-Jan-2019
Category:
Upload: buithu
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
8
133 7 CONCLUSION “A tradition is just an innovation that has succeeded” 1 Our makers have certainly not been short of innovation. The astonishing variety of designs speaks of lively creativity and a willingness to experiment. This is an ancient craft, and as Charlie Tyler found, completely new ideas are rare. “Sometimes I come across a wheel as old as the hills that has my idea on it. Of course, although I thought of it, it isn’t my idea. Some of these things have been used for years and years.” 2 Nevertheless, some of the ideas that flowered in New Zealand under the demands of depression or wartime were truly new, at least in spinning wheels. Makers invented and adapted. Lyndsay Fenwick has written: “We now see the time of the Second World War as a melting pot for alternative ideas to traditional spinning wheels, brought about by our handyman culture, material constraints and an urgent need to provide the spun wool that was no longer available through importation.” 3 A cuphook twisted into a corkscrew by John Moore became a new kind of orifice, replacing the more technologically demanding metal tube, and this in turn led to a simple hook and then to a metal V, now familiar to spinners in many countries. Standard hinges allowed Graham’s mother- of-all to tilt, avoiding the need to fabricate screws of wood or fit a metal equivalent for adjusting drive band tension. This has become a widely used system. 1 “Une tradition, ce n’est jamais qu’un progrès qui a réussi” Maurice Druon, Le pouvoir (1965). 2 Hutt News, 3 November 1970. 3 “Wheels for the Empire and the War Effort” Context, forthcoming. The Ashford invention of the flyer in one with the whorl has been copied in several countries as well as New Zealand. Some innovations came from other technologies: the sliding hook on Jennings’ flyer arm, for example, may have been already familiar in other uses. Treadle sewing machines contributed not only their drive wheels but often much of their frame as well. Was it because all the old treadle sewing machines were in use and not available for recycling that Martin and Fraser (and perhaps others) had their metal wheels specially cast? Or was it to ensure consistency? Martin added his own refinement, a thickening of the rim to act as counterweight to the treadle. The widespread use of a Picardy-type flyer is another tradition that can be traced back to Harold Martin. We don’t know where he got the inspiration for a single post with the flyer in front of it: perhaps from simply thinking creatively about how to produce a sturdy, affordable, small wheel as effectively and economically as possible. The idea has certainly served New Zealand makers well ever since, and has begun to be used in other countries. Martin also introduced to New Zealand spinning wheels the metal flyer, the off- centre footman connection instead of a crank (later transferred by others to wooden drive wheels), and the wheel dropped partly below the level of the table. These all have antecedents in other types of machine or in spinning wheels in other countries, but we can only admire the ingenuity that combined so many ideas in his unassuming little “iron horse”. The flyer frame with its tilting adjustment was probably devised by Schofield before or during World War Two, as no examples
Transcript

133

7 CONCLUSION

“A tradition is just an innovation

that has succeeded”1

Our makers have certainly not been short of innovation. The astonishing variety of designs speaks of lively creativity and a willingness to experiment. This is an ancient craft, and as Charlie Tyler found, completely new ideas are rare. “Sometimes I come across a wheel as old as the hills that has my idea on it. Of course, although I thought of it, it isn’t my idea. Some of these things have been used for years and years.”2 Nevertheless, some of the ideas that flowered in New Zealand under the demands of depression or wartime were truly new, at least in spinning wheels. Makers invented and adapted. Lyndsay Fenwick has written: “We now see the time of the Second World War as a melting pot for alternative ideas to traditional spinning wheels, brought about by our handyman culture, material constraints and an urgent need to provide the spun wool that was no longer available through importation.”3 A cuphook twisted into a corkscrew by John Moore became a new kind of orifice, replacing the more technologically demanding metal tube, and this in turn led to a simple hook and then to a metal V, now familiar to spinners in many countries. Standard hinges allowed Graham’s mother-of-all to tilt, avoiding the need to fabricate screws of wood or fit a metal equivalent for adjusting drive band tension. This has become a widely used system. 1 “Une tradition, ce n’est jamais qu’un progrès qui a réussi” Maurice Druon, Le pouvoir (1965). 2 Hutt News, 3 November 1970. 3 “Wheels for the Empire and the War Effort” Context, forthcoming.

The Ashford invention of the flyer in one with the whorl has been copied in several countries as well as New Zealand. Some innovations came from other technologies: the sliding hook on Jennings’ flyer arm, for example, may have been already familiar in other uses. Treadle sewing machines contributed not only their drive wheels but often much of their frame as well. Was it because all the old treadle sewing machines were in use and not available for recycling that Martin and Fraser (and perhaps others) had their metal wheels specially cast? Or was it to ensure consistency? Martin added his own refinement, a thickening of the rim to act as counterweight to the treadle. The widespread use of a Picardy-type flyer is another tradition that can be traced back to Harold Martin. We don’t know where he got the inspiration for a single post with the flyer in front of it: perhaps from simply thinking creatively about how to produce a sturdy, affordable, small wheel as effectively and economically as possible. The idea has certainly served New Zealand makers well ever since, and has begun to be used in other countries. Martin also introduced to New Zealand spinning wheels the metal flyer, the off-centre footman connection instead of a crank (later transferred by others to wooden drive wheels), and the wheel dropped partly below the level of the table. These all have antecedents in other types of machine or in spinning wheels in other countries, but we can only admire the ingenuity that combined so many ideas in his unassuming little “iron horse”. The flyer frame with its tilting adjustment was probably devised by Schofield before or during World War Two, as no examples

134

have been seen from before that time. It contributed to several wheel designs in New Zealand, notably the outstandingly successful Wendy. Later makers used it in their own ways, refining and changing it – an excellent illustration of the interaction between tradition and innovation. These ideas have become part of the repertoire of New Zealand (and in some cases overseas) makers. “It was from this wartime base that our spinning wheels developed again in remarkable ways with the resurgence of interest in spinning in the 1960s and 70s.”4 So what are the qualities of a good spinning wheel maker? Obviously they include fine craftsmanship, and as much concern for the functioning of the wheel as for its looks. A good maker can draw on a wide understanding of the working of machines of various kinds, and has an excellent set of skills in metal as well as wood. It is noteworthy that many of the best makers have had an engineering background. Resourcefulness is vital, particularly when working on a shoestring. The famous New Zealand idea that anything can be fixed with a piece of number eight fencing wire indicates the kind of home-made machine often to be found in spinning wheel making workshops. It really helps too if the maker is able to spin, as John Beauchamp knew when he insisted that Nagy learn to spin before learning to make wheels. Most makers have been competent spinners, from Harold Martin to Richard Ashford. A maker who does not intimately understand the process of spinning would be better to stick to making furniture. This is a unique craft, in that its aim is to make a tool for another craft – that of the spinner. The relationship between the two crafts must be close. The best makers, large

4 Lyndsay Fenwick again.

or small scale, respond to comments and suggestions from spinners, and either improve their designs over time (like Shearman) or add new models (like McGreevy). The number of decisions a wheel-maker must take when designing a wheel is daunting. It is not only the obvious things, like upright or horizontal, double drive or Scotch tension (or, rarely, bobbin lead). We have considered a few details, like construction of drive wheel and flyer, type of crank, mechanism for drive band tension, and orifice style. There are many, many other vital questions, some of them quite technical.5 Ratios of drive wheel to whorl are obviously important, but many other factors can make or break the success of a spinning wheel. On a Scotch tension wheel, for example, the circumference of the bobbin whorl need only be sufficient to provide traction, but on a double drive wheel the ratio between the circumferences of bobbin whorl and spindle whorl, and hence between their speeds, also affects spinning characteristics. The greater the difference in size, the stronger the pull on the yarn to wind on.6 Then the maker must decide what to use for spindle bearings; the number, size and placing of the hooks on the flyer (if hooks are used); the internal diameter of the orifice (if using one); the placing, angle and number of legs (there was once a good reason for having only three, but I am not sure that it is valid in these days of level floors) and the length of the axle crank (which affects treadling). Or is there a crank at all? Martin, McGreevy and others managed to do away with it. What is the 5 For a maker’s view of spinning wheel design see Eric Corran’s Understanding the Spinning Wheel. 6 Selected Canadian Spinning Wheels in Perspective, Judith Buxton (National Museums of Canada 1980) 111-115. I have personally found that for my Ron Shearman wheel, which is convertible between Scotch tension and double drive, it is worthwhile to have two sets of bobbins, those with smaller groove circumference being better for double drive. But too small and they lack friction and slip too much.

135

angle of the wheel posts, and how is the axle to be secured in them? This last question was neatly sidestepped by Martin when he attached the axle to the back of the table. The size and type of treadle is another consideration for the maker. Single treadle mechanisms are more practical for smaller-scale makers, but there are still questions to answer: large (for two feet) or small (for one); ending at the treadle bar or pivoting on it with an overhang for the heel;7 hinged to a fixed treadle bar or fixed to a movable treadle bar. If the treadle bar rotates with treadling, how is it connected to the front legs? If it simply ends in metal spikes that move in holes, there is wear on the wood of the legs. A bearing of some sort can be used, or even the metal hook-and-eye shortcut found in Sleeping Beauty wheels. Bearings in general call for decisions. Should ballbearings be used? Aileen Stace disliked them because they made a wheel run so fast it could “get away” from the spinner; she believed a little friction was better.8 Many might disagree today. But as Mike Keeves points out, ballraces require very accurate positioning to run smoothly. This is why he uses no turning in the frames of his Grace wheels. A turned post may more easily be twisted a fraction of a degree when placed in position than one with flat square surfaces, causing misalignment of the ballrace and annoying friction for the spinner.9 These and other factors can make or break the success of a spinning wheel. They are largely independent of the external appearance of the wheel. Yet how many of us judge a wheel mainly by its looks? 7 The “heel-toe” treadle is favoured by quite a few spinners, though I have read somewhere that it can damage leg tendons in the long run. 8 Graham Collins, personal communication June 2009. 9 Mike Keeves, personal communication June 2009.

Of course those makers who meticulously copy an earlier wheel bypass some of the potential problems, but this requires a special skill of its own. Nicolson and Bartlett are two who followed an established pattern to produce fine wheels, though as the years went by, both made modifications. Some makers began by copying a design (often from the magazine Popular Mechanics) and went on to create their own. Some had had experience with spinning on wheels they disliked (or had seen wives or friends struggling with their wheels) and wanted to provide something better. Others began from scratch, working from function to form and gradually improving their creation, often with advice from experienced spinners. To some degree their solutions to the sorts of questions asked of them were conditioned by their skills and the resources available. Some were specialists in wood: they might produce beautiful turning but use the minimum of metal parts. Others preferred to work mainly with metal. And of course in times of shortage, great ingenuity in adapting to the materials available was shown. Some of the innovations have truly become traditions. All makers of good spinning wheels deserve our admiration and respect. It is a most demanding craft, and New Zealanders over the years have met its demands creatively and skilfully.

136

Grace wheel in the Botanic Gardens, Christchurch

137

SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY

Baines, Patricia, Spinning Wheels Spinners and Spinning (B.T. Batsford Ltd, London 1977, 1982)

Buxton, Judith, Selected Canadian Spinning Wheels in Perspective, an analytical approach (National Museums of Canada 1980, reprinted by Canadian Museum of Civilisation 1992)

Bryant, David, Wheels and Looms, Making equipment for spinning and weaving (B.T. Batsford Ltd, London 1987)

Corran, Eric, Understanding the Spinning Wheel (Melbourne 1997) Cummer, Joan Whittaker, A Book of Spinning Wheels (Peter E. Randall, Portsmouth, New

Hampshire, USA 1994) Fenwick, Lyndsay, “Metal Spinning Wheels” The Spinning Wheel Sleuth #63 (January 2009) 7-

10 Fenwick, Lyndsay, “Wheels for the Empire and the War Effort” Context (forthcoming)

Knox, Mary, and Fenwick, Lyndsay, “Spinning Wheels and Wheel-makers in 1969” Creative Fibre 11.4 (March 2009) 28-31

Leadbeater, Eliza, Spinning and Spinning Wheels (Shire Publications Ltd 1979)

Nicholson, Heather, The Loving Stitch (Auckland University Press 1998)

138

INDEX OF MAKERS & WHEELS

Page numbers in bold type are sections in chapter 5

A-line, 31, 32 Adam, 31 Airest, 24, 59, 94 Arnon, 45 Alexander, Tom, 13, 32, 128 Arlott, John, 61, 68, 99, 125 Arnst, Leslie, 32 Ashford, 12, 14, 16, 28, 39,

49, 50, 51, 65, 71, 83-85, 86, 107, 109, 111, 113, 114, 119, 122-123, 124, 125, 126, 128, 133

Ashford, Richard, 11, 134 Ashford, Walter, 10, 83, 125,

127 Atkinson, Hal, 10, 15, 85,

103, 124, 125, 126, 127, 130,

Baillie, Alex (Baillie & Watts), 27, 61, 66, 69, 112-114

Bartlett, Ken, 77, 120, 135 Baynes, Ian, 12, 33, 86 Beauchamp, John, 11, 34, 78,

87, 105, 123, 125, 134 Bebbington, Murray, 86 Beulah, 34, 107, 127 Blis Export Ltd, 36 Bressay, 21, 35 Bulky Spinner (Ashford) 39,

122 Business Products, 63 Callister, Alan, 35 Camelot, 11, 36, 40, 124 Canterbury, 36, 128 Carlisle, 37 Catherine, 44 Chapman-Taylor, James

Walter, 9, 78, 88, 118 Cherub, 12, 37, 131

Chisholm, Ray 20, 26, 27, 38, 62, 109, 114-115, 117, 129-130

Cleopatra, 38, 109, 129-130 Club Mini, 55 Cole, E R, 15, 21, 38, 104,

118-119, 131 Collins, Graham, 12, 37, 131 Colonial, 33, 86 Colthart, James, 11, 39, 79,

81, 89-90, 117, 125, 126 Coop, Roy, 114 Cottier, Peter, 106 Country Spinner, 39, 84 Crawford, Ted, 40 Crofter, 40 Dryad (UK), 82, 112 Dunnachie, 40, 120, 123,

125, 127, 128, Easycraft, 16, 31, 41, 117 Eclipse, 41, 119 Elizabeth, 11, 16, 84 Ettrick (Australia), 126 Field, Frank, 42, 128 Fleur, 42, 125, 130 Fomotor, Karl, 34, 60, 71,

107, 119 Fraser, G, 10, 43, 120, 123,

133 Fraser, Roderick, 9, 17, 91-

93, 117, 120,123, 124, 126

Fricke (USA), 126 Frizzell, Noel, 44, 128 Garrett, Leo, 12, 44 Genesis, 44 Gibson, Joe, 17, 46, 79 Glenfield Industries, 24, 59,

94 Golding (USA), 126

Grace, 11, 12, 47, 95-96, 119, 125, 127, 131-132, 135

Grace Gypsy, 47, 95 Grace Imp, 47, 95 Graham, JW, 10, 18, 124,

133 Gubb, Peter, 106 Gypsy Grace, 47, 95 Hegan, 48, 125, 126 Hamilton, 10, 19, 117, 120 Homecraft, 83-84 Homespinner, 20, 41 Horrill, Seton, 48 Husfliden (Norway), 77, 121 Imp (Grace) 47, 95 Imp (Keneila) 49, 129 Indian (bulky) Spinner

(Ashford), 39 Indian Spinner (Princess), 63 Jane, 49, 118, 125 Jennings, Patrick, 10, 11, 50,

96-97, 120, 121, 123, 125, 126-127, 128, 133

Jenny, 20, 114, 123 Johnson, MD, 16, 31, 41, 117 Joy, 50, 84, 119, 125 Justus, 45 Karena, 86 Karure, 10, 15, 21, 23, 102,

103-4, 118, 119, 127 Keeves, Mike, 12, 47, 95-96,

117, 119, 126, 130, 131-132, 135

Keneila Imp, 49, 129 Kerwood, Derek, 51, 120,

125 Kintyre, 21 Kiwi, 51, 65, 84, 119, 122,

125 Lady Liverpool, 10, 78 Lawrenson, Peter, 73

139

Lendrum (Canada), 122 Leola, 52 Little Gem, 52, 99, 125 Little Grace, Little Grace

Special, 52, 95-96 Little Peggy, 53, 110, 111 Louet (Netherlands), 74, 126,

128 Madigan, G W, 11, 54, 98,

125, 130 Majacraft, 12, 27, 52, 57, 60,

61, 63, 67, 70, 98, 99, 119, 122, 125, 126, 128, 131

Marion, 54, 119, 125, Martin, Harold, 10, 22, 97,

100-101, 119-120, 121-122, 123, 124-125, 126, 133, 134, 135

Mathieson, I G., 55, 122, Matterson, Garth, 56 Maxwell, Ross, 27, 112-114 Mayflower, 24, 94 McDonald, W A, 11, 56, 102,

118, 129 McGreevy, Ivan, 11, 42, 49,

54, 118, 122, 125, 128, 130, 134

Mecchia, 11, 22, 57, 80 Millie, 57, 99, 125 Miro, 10, 21, 23, 103-104,

118, 121, 126 Mitzi, 26, 80, 110, 111, 117 Moore, John, 10, 15, 21, 23,

83-4, 85, 102, 103-104, 118, 121, 124, 125, 126, 127, 133

Morrison, Walter, 10, 11, 40, 58, 97, 119, 120, 123, 125, 126, 127,

Nagy, Istvan, 11, 24, 59, 105-106, 118, 120, 134

Napier, H H, 24, 59, 94, 117, 126

Nees, 20, 41, 119 Nicolson, E, 25, 29-30, 135

Northern European, 26, 109, 110

Omana Industries, 27, 63, 69, 114, 115

Peacock, Les, 11, 34, 60, 71, 84, 107, 119, 125, 126, 127

Phelps, Leo, 52 Pioneer, 60, 125 Pipy, 11, 26, 38, 62, 75, 108-

109, 114-115, 117, 131 Pixie 61, 113, 114 Poad, Owen & Glynis, 64,

99, 119 Polly, 61, 99, 125 Pollyanna, 61, 99, 125 Poly, 62, 108, 119, 125, 126,

128 Poore, Philip, 11, 26, 38, 49,

62, 75, 108-109, 114-115, 119, 128, 129, 131

Price, Noel, 62 Princess, 63, 113, 114 Rappard, John, 11, 26, 53,

73, 80, 84, 109-111, 117, 126, 130-131

Rees, Harry, 31, 82 Regent, 66 Romney, 52, 63 Rose, 64, 99, 125 Ross, David, 9 Rotorua Woodcraft, 21, 35 Rudhall, Reg, 11, 81, 89-90,

117, 126, Saxonie, 27, 99, 125 Schofield, George Henry, 10,

65, 102, 111-112, 117, 118, 128-129, 133-134

Scholar, 65, 84, 125 Schouten, Hans, 45 Serena, 66, 114, 118 Sharp & Page, 11, 36, 40 Shearman, Ron, 12, 13, 66,

125, 127, 128, 134

Shields, Cecil, 58, 67, 125, 127

Simon, Eric, 84, 107 Simplex, 86 Sinclair, D, 9 Sleeping Beauty, 10, 20, 27,

61, 63, 66, 69, 112-115, 117, 118, 123, 124, 135

Smithies, Harold, 67, 125, 127

Sprite, 108 Sutherland, Alex, 68, 117 Suzie, 68, 99, 119, 125 Tekoteko, 75, 109 Thomas, Albie, 70, 122 Thompson, John, 69, 117 Thumbelina, 69, 114, 118 Tiny Tim, 70, 99 Tom Thumb, 70, 122 Toop, A & Son, 21, 103, 121 Traditional, 11, 20, 28, 84,

86, 113, 114, 122, 124 Traveller, 71, 84, 123, 124 Tui, 71 Tyler, Charles, 11, 29, 72, 81,

115-116, 123, 133 Vandyke (Australia), 119 Wagg, Guy, 30 Waikato Turnery, 23, 80 Warr, Reginald, 13, 72, 122-

123 Weavejoy, 73, 98 Wendy, 38, 49, 129, 130, 134 Wee Peggy, 73, 110, 111 Wee QT, 74 Wendy, 38, 49, 75, 98, 108-

109, 129, 130, 134 Westminster, 66 Wildy, Cdr, 37 Wing, Sidney, 11, 76, 82, 89-

90, 117, 126, 127 Woodcraft Industries, 31, 82 Woodspin, 106

140

The CD-ROM opposite contains those photographs which are numbered in the text of the book. The unnumbered

photographs are not included as they are not available in a larger or colour version.

Even so, a few of the photographs in the book and on the CD-ROM are not as good as I would wish; some are from

old snapshots, or have been taken under less than ideal conditions.

Most are my own, many are by Lyndsay Fenwick, and others

have been contributed by kind people in New Zealand and overseas. I thank them all.

The photographs are copyright. Apart from fair dealings for

the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, they may not be reproduced by any process (including

electronic) without the prior permission of the photographer or copyright owner. Please contact the author for

information: [email protected]

ISBN 978-0-473-16335-8


Recommended