+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 7. References - Home - Springer978-3-658-02668...285 Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in...

7. References - Home - Springer978-3-658-02668...285 Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in...

Date post: 27-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: phamngoc
View: 214 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
15
280 7. References Aharoni, Y. (1966). The Foreign Investment Decision Process. Boston: Harvard University Press. Alfoldi, E. A., Clegg, L. G., & McGaughey, S. L. (2012). Coordination at the edge of the empire: The delegation of headquarters functions through regional management mandates. Journal of International Management, 18(3), 276-292. Ambos, B., & Mahnke, V. (2010). How Do MNC Headquarters Add Value?. Management Inter- national Review, 50(4), 403 412. Ambos, T., & Birkinshaw, J. M. (2010). Headquarters' attention and its effects on subsidiary per- formance. Management International Review, 50(4), 449-469. Andersen, O. (1993). On the internationalization process of firms: a critical analysis. Journal of International Business, 24(2), 209-232. Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. (2000). In Search of Centre of Excellence - Network Embed- dedness and Subsidiary Roles in MNCs. Management International Review, 40(4), 329-350. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2001). Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs: a multilevel analysis. Organization Studies, 22(6), 10131034. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2007). Balancing subsidiary influence in the federa- tive MNC: a business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 802- 818. Araujo, L., & Rezende, S. (2003). Path dependence, MNCs and the internationalisation process: a relational approach. International Business Review, 12(6), 719737. Aspelund, A., & Madsen, T. K. (2009). The role of innovative and entrepreneurial behavior in internationalization processes. In: Sinkovics, R. R., & Gauri, P. N. (Eds.), New Challenges to International Marketing. Bingley: Emerald, 155-175. Axelsson, B., & Johanson, J. (1992). Foreign market entry: The textbook vs. the network view. In: Axelsson, B., & Easton, G. (Eds.), Industrial networks: A new view of reality. London: Routledge, 218231. Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Manage- ment, 17(1), 99-120. Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1986). Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Business Re- view, 64(6), 8794. Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: the transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Behrman, J. N. (1969). Some Patterns in the Rise of the Multinational Enterprise. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina. Benito, G., Lunnan, R., & Tomassen, S. (2011). Distant Encounters of the Third Kind: Multina- tional Companies Locating Divisional Headquarters Abroad. Journal of Management Stud- ies, 48(2), 373-394. N. Lohr, Foreign Market Subsidiary Mandates, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-02668-4, © Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014
Transcript

280

7. References

Aharoni, Y. (1966). The Foreign Investment Decision Process. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Alfoldi, E. A., Clegg, L. G., & McGaughey, S. L. (2012). Coordination at the edge of the empire: The delegation of headquarters functions through regional management mandates. Journal of International Management, 18(3), 276-292.

Ambos, B., & Mahnke, V. (2010). How Do MNC Headquarters Add Value?. Management Inter-national Review, 50(4), 403 412.

Ambos, T., & Birkinshaw, J. M. (2010). Headquarters' attention and its effects on subsidiary per-formance. Management International Review, 50(4), 449-469.

Andersen, O. (1993). On the internationalization process of firms: a critical analysis. Journal of International Business, 24(2), 209-232.

Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. (2000). In Search of Centre of Excellence - Network Embed-dedness and Subsidiary Roles in MNCs. Management International Review, 40(4), 329-350.

Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2001). Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs: a multilevel analysis. Organization Studies, 22(6), 1013–1034.

Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2007). Balancing subsidiary influence in the federa-tive MNC: a business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 802-818.

Araujo, L., & Rezende, S. (2003). Path dependence, MNCs and the internationalisation process: a relational approach. International Business Review, 12(6), 719–737.

Aspelund, A., & Madsen, T. K. (2009). The role of innovative and entrepreneurial behavior in internationalization processes. In: Sinkovics, R. R., & Gauri, P. N. (Eds.), New Challenges to International Marketing. Bingley: Emerald, 155-175.

Axelsson, B., & Johanson, J. (1992). Foreign market entry: The textbook vs. the network view. In: Axelsson, B., & Easton, G. (Eds.), Industrial networks: A new view of reality. London: Routledge, 218–231.

Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Manage-ment, 17(1), 99-120.

Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1986). Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Business Re-view, 64(6), 87–94.

Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: the transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Behrman, J. N. (1969). Some Patterns in the Rise of the Multinational Enterprise. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

Benito, G., Lunnan, R., & Tomassen, S. (2011). Distant Encounters of the Third Kind: Multina-tional Companies Locating Divisional Headquarters Abroad. Journal of Management Stud-ies, 48(2), 373-394.

N. Lohr, Foreign Market Subsidiary Mandates, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-02668-4, © Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

281

Bilkey, W. J., & Tesar, G. (1977). Export behavior of smaller-sized Wisconsin manufacturing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 93-98.

Birkinshaw, J. M. (1996). How subsidiary mandates are gained and lost. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(3), 467-496.

Birkinshaw, J. M. (1997). Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3), 207-229.

Birkinshaw, J. M., Brannen, M. Y., & Tung, R. L. (2011). From a distance and generalizable to up-close and grounded: reclaiming a place for qualitative methods in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 573-581.

Birkinshaw, J. M., Braunerhjelm, P., Holm, U., & Terjesen, S. (2006). Why do some companies move their headquarters abroad?. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 681-700.

Birkinshaw, J. M., & Fry, N. (1998). Subsidiary initiatives to develop new markets. Sloan Man-agement Review, 39(3), 51-61.

Birkinshaw, J. M., & Hood, N. (1998). Multinational subsidiary development: capability evolu-tion and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 773-795.

Birkinshaw, J. M., Hood, N., & Jonsson, S. (1998). Building firm-specific advantages in multina-tional corporations: the role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 221-241.

Birkinshaw, J. M., Hood, N., & Young, S. (2005). Subsidiary Entrepreneurship, Internal and Ex-ternal Competitive Forces, and Subsidiary Performance. International Business Review,14(2), 227-248.

Birkinshaw, J. M., & Lingblad, M. (2005). Intrafirm competition and charter evolution in the multibusiness firm. Organization Science, 16(6), 674-686.

Birkinshaw, J. M., & Morrison, A. J. (1995). Configurations of strategy and structure in multina-tional subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4), 729-753.

Birkinshaw, J. M., & Pedersen, T. (2009). Strategy and management in MNE subsidiaries. In: Rugman, A. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of international business. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press, 367-388.

Birkinshaw, J. M., & Ridderstråle, J. (1999). Fighting the corporate immune system: a process study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations. International Business Review,8(2), 149-180.

Björkman, I., & Forsgren, M. (2000). Nordic International Business Research. A review of its development. International Studies of Management and Organization, 30(1), 6-25.

Blankenburg Holm, D., Drogendijk, R., Hohenthal, J., Holm, U., Johanson, M., & Zander, I. (2009). The internationalization processes of the firm: a new research agenda. In: Larimo, J., & Vissak, T. (Eds.), Research on Knowledge, Innovation and Internationalization. The in-ternationalisation processes of the multinational corporation. Bingley: Emerald, 3-20.

282

Bonin, B, & Perron, B. (1986). World product mandates and firms operating in Quebec. In: Etemad, H., & Dulude, L. S. (Eds.), Managing the multinational subsidiary. London: Croom Helm, 161-176.

Bouquet, C. D. (1999). Growing in a Foreign Soil: A Review of Subsidiary Evolution. Paper pre-sented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management (AOM) in Chicago, USA.

Bouquet, C. D., & Birkinshaw, J. M. (2008). Weight versus voice: how foreign subsidiaries gain the attention of headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 577-601.

Bradley, J. (1993). Methodological Issues and Practices in Qualitative Research. The Library Quarterly, 63(4), 431-449.

Buckley, P. J. (1983). New Theories of International Business: Some Unresolved Issues. In: Cas-son, M. C. (Ed.), The growth of international business. London: George Allen & Unwin, 34-50.

Buckley, P. J. (2009). Business history and international business. Business History, 51(3), 307-333.

Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Buckley, P. J., & Hashai, N. (2009). Formalizing internationalization in the eclectic paradigm. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(1), 58-70

Calof, J., & Beamish, P. (1995). Adapting to foreign markets: explaining internationalisation. International Business Review, 4(2), 115-131.

Cantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. (2005). MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1109-1128.

Cantwell, J., & Santangelo, G. D. (1999). The frontier of international technology networks: sourcing abroad the most highly tacit capabilities. Information Economics and Policy, 11(1), 101-123.

Cavusgil, S. T. (1980). On the internationalization process of firms. European Research, 8(6), 273-281.

Cavusgil, S. T. (1984). Differences among exporting firms based on their degree of international-ization. Journal of Business Research, 12(2), 195-208.

Cavusgil, S. T., & Czinkota, M. R. (1990). International Perspectives on Trade Promotion and Assistance. New York: Quorum Books.

Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405.

Cyert, R. M., & James, G. M. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Czinkota, M. R. (1982). Export development strategies: US promotion policies. New York: Prae-ger Publishers.

Darrough, M. N., & Stoughton, N. M. (1986). Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection: The Ques-tion of Financial Structure. Journal of Finance, 41(2), 501-513.

283

Dörrenbächer, C., & Gammelgaard, J. (2010). Multinational Corporations, Inter-organizational Networks and Subsidiary Charter Removals. Journal of World Business, 45(2), 206-216.

Doz, Y. L. (2011) Qualitative research for international business. Journal of International Busi-ness Studies, 42(5), 582-590.

Doz, Y. L., Asakawa, K., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. (1997). The Metanational Corporation. INSEAD Working Paper (97/60/SM), Fontainebleau, France.

Doz, Y. L., & Prahalad, C. K. (1991). Managing DMNCs: A Search for a New Paradigm. Strate-gic Management Journal, 12(S1), 145-164.

Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: im-plications for productivity and innovation. Construction Management and Economics, 20(7), 621-631.

Dunning, J. H. (1977). Trade, location of economic activity and the MNEs: A search for an eclec-tic paradigm. In: Wijikman, P. (Ed.), The international allocation of economic activity. Lon-don: Macmillan, 395-418.

Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extension. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1-31.

Dunning J. H. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. New York, NY: Addi-son-Wesley.

Dunning, J. H. (1998). Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor?. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 45-66.

Dunning, J. H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9(2), 163-190.

Eden, L. (2005). Cave! Hic Dragones! Alan M. Rugman’s contribution to the field of internation-al business. In: Verbeke, A. (Ed.), Research in global strategic management. Bingley: Emer-ald, 9-27.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989a). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Manage-ment Review, (14)1, 57-74.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989b). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.

Enright, M. J. (2005a). Regional Management Centres in the Asia-Pacific. Management Interna-tional Review, 45(1), 59-82.

Enright, M. J. (2005b). The Role of Regional Management Centers. Management International Review, 45(1), 83-102.

Enright, M. J., & Subramanian, V. (2007). An organizing framework for multinational subsidiar-ies. Management International Review, 47(6), 895-924.

284

Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgård, A., & Sharma, D. D. (1997). Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 337–360.

Figueira-de-Lemos, F., Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2011). Risk management in the internation-alization process of the firm: A note on the Uppsala model. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 143-153.

Forsgren, M. (2002). The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalisation process model: A critical review. International Business Review, 11(3), 257-277.

Forsgren, M., Holm, U., & Johanson, J. (1992). Internationalisation of the second degree – the emergence of European-based centres in Swedish firms. In: Young, S., & Hamill, J. (Eds.), Europe and the multinationals – Issues and responses for the 1990s. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 235-253.

Forsgren, M., Holm, U., & Johanson, J. (1995). Division headquarters go abroad – a step in the internationalization of the multinational corporation. Journal of Management Studies, 32(4), 475-491.

Forsgren, M., Holm, U., & Johanson, J. (2005). Managing the embedded multinational: A busi-ness network view. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Fratochii L., & Holm, U. (1998). Centres of excellence in the international firm. In: Birkinshaw, J. M., & Hood, N. (Eds.), Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development. Basingstoke Hampshire: Macmillan, 189-205.

Frost, T. S., Birkinshaw, J. M., & Ensign, P. C. (2002). Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 997-1018.

Galunic, D. C., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1996). The evolution of intracorporate domains: divisional charter losses in high technology, multidivisional corporations. Organization Science, 7(3), 255-282.

Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombination in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1193-1201.

Gatignon, H., & Anderson, E. (1988). The Multinational Corporation’s Degree of Control over Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation. Journal of Law, Eco-nomics & Organization, 4(2), 305-366.

Geppert, M., Williams, K., & Matten, D. (2003). The social construction of contextual rationali-ties in MNCs: an Anglo-German comparison of subsidiary choice. Journal of Management Studies, 40(3), 617-641.

Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. (1989). Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Stra-tegic Management Journal, 10(4), 323-337.

Giddy, I. H. (1978). The demise of the product cycle model in international business theory. Co-lumbia Journal of World Business, 13(1), 90-97.

Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Education-al Communication & Technology Journal, 29(2), 75-91.

285

Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research, Volume 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 768-792.

Haldin-Herrgard, T. (2000). Difficulties in diffusion of tacit knowledge in organizations. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(4), 357-365.

Harzing, A. W., & Noorderhaven, N. (2006). Knowledge flows in MNCs: an empirical test and extension of Gupta and Govindarajan's typology of subsidiary roles. International Business Review, 15(3), 195-214.

Hedlund, G. (1986). The Hypermodern MNC - A Heterarchy?. Human Resource Management, 25(1), 9-36.

Hedlund, G., & Kverneland, A. (1985). Are strategies for foreign market entry changing? The case of Swedish investments in Japan. International Studies of Management and Organiza-tion, 15(2), 41-59.

Hennart, J.-F. (1977). A Theory of Foreign Direct Investment. PhD Dissertation, University of Maryland at College Park.

Hennart, J.-F. (1982). A Theory of Multinational Enterprise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Hennart, J.-F. (2001). Theories of Multinational Enterprise. In: Rugman, A. M., & Brewer, T. L. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 127-149.

Herriott, R. E., & Firestone, W. A. (1983). Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing de-scription and generalizability. Educational Research, 12(2), 14-19.

Hutzschenreuter, T., Voll, J. C., & Verbeke, A. (2011). The impact of added cultural distance and cultural diversity on international expansion patterns: a Penrosean perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 305-29.

Hymer, S. H. (1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (1960 doctoral thesis submitted posthumously for publication by Charles P. Kindleberger).

Itaki, M. (1991). A critical assessment of the eclectic theory of the multinational enterprise. Jour-nal of International Business Studies, 22(3), 445-460.

Jensen, M. C, & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm - managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Johanson J., & Mattsson, L. G. (1986). International marketing and internationalization processes - a network approach. In: Turnbull, P. W., & Paliwada, S. J. (Eds.), Research in international marketing. London: Croom Helm, 234-265.

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalisation process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of Interna-tional Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32.

286

Johanson J., & Vahlne J. E. (1990). The Mechanism of Internationalization. International Mar-keting Review, 7(4), 11-24.

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreigness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411-1431.

Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The Internationalisation of the Firm- Four Swedish Cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 305- 322.

Kähäri, P., Piekkari, R., Barner-Rasmussen, W., & Hilvo, I. (2010). Rise and fall of regional headquarters: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European International Business Academy (EIBA) in Porto, Portugal.

Kapler, J. K. (2007). The Theory of the Firm, the Theory of Competition and the Transnational Corporation. Competition & Change, 11(4), 287-306.

Knight, G. A. (1997). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepre-neurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3), 213-225.

Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (1996). The born global firm: A challenge to traditional interna-tionalization theory. Advances in International Marketing, 8(1), 11-26.

Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Jour-nal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432.

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multi-national corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(4), 625-645.

Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in Qualitative Research: The Assessment of Trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 214-222.

Kumar, N., Stern, L. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Conducting interorganizational research us-ing key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1633-1651.

Kutschker, M., & Schmid, S. (2011) Internationales Management, Volume 7. Munich: Olden-bourg.

Lehrer. M., & Asakawa, K. (1994). Regional management and regional headquarters: An empir-ical study of adaptation in American and Japanese MNCs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management (AOM) in Dallas, USA.

Lehrer, M., & Asakawa, K. (1999). Unbundling European operations: Regional management and corporate flexibility in American and Japanese MNCs. Journal of World Business, 34(3), 267-286.

Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). A dual methodology for case studies. Organization Science, 1(3), 248-266.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Luostarinen, R. K. (1979). Internationalization of the firm. Helsinki: Acta Academic Oeconomica Helsingiensis.

Luostarinen, R. K., & Welch, L. (1990). International Business Operations. Helsinki: Kyriiri Oy.

287

Lyle, S. W., & Zawacki, R. A. (1997). Centers of excellence: empowering people to manage change. Information Systems Management, 14(1), 26-29.

Macharzina, K., & Engelhard, J. (1991). Paradigm shift in international business research: from partist and eclectic approaches to the GAINS paradigm. Management International Review, 31(4), 23-43.

Madsen, T. K., & Servais, P. (1997). The internationalization of born globals: An evolutionary perspective. International Business Review, 6(6), 561-583.

Malnight, T. W. (1995). Globalization of an ethnocentric firm: an evolutionary perspective. Stra-tegic Management Journal, 16(2), 119-141.

Markusen, J. R. (2001). International Trade Theory and International Business. In: Rugman, A. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of International Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 69-87.

Marshall, D., & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing Qualitative Research, Volume 3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Martinez, J. I., & Jarillo, J. C. (1991). Coordination demands of international strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(3), 429-444.

Meyer, K. E., & Gelbuda, M. (2006). Process Perspectives in International Business Research, Management International Review, 46, 143-164.

Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. (2011). Multinational enterprises and local contexts: the opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 235-252.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Miller, D. (1983). The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-791.

Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1980). Momentum and Revolution in Organizational Adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 23(4), 591-614.

Mintzberg, H. (1979). An Emerging Strategy of “Direct” Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 582-589.

Morschett, D. (2007). Institutionalisierung und Koordination von ausländischen Tochtergesell-schaften. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. (2004). Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 385-406.

Newman, K. L., & Nollen, S. D. (1996). Culture and congruence: the fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(4), 753-779.

Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. (1994). Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6), 491-502.

O’Donnell, S. W. (2000). Managing foreign subsidiaries: agents of headquarters, or an independ-ent network?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 525-548.

288

Oesterle, M. J., & Richta, B. T. (2009). Erfolgswirkungen internationaler Unternehmenstätigkeit – Stand der empirischen Forschung und Notwendigkeit verbesserter Forschungsansätze. In: Schmid, S. (Ed.), Management der Internationalisierung. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 51-85.

Oh, C. H., & Rugman, A. M. (2012). Regional integration and the international strategies of large European firms. International Business Review, 21(3), 493-507.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Pauwels, P., Lommelen, T., & Matthyssens, P. (2004). The internationalization process of the firm: progression through institutionalization, exploitative and exploratory learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of International Business (AIB) in Stock-holm, Sweden.

Pauwels, P., & Matthyssens, P. (2004). The architecture of multiple case study research in inter-national business. In: Marschan-Piekkari, R., & Welch, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business. Cheltenham & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 125-143.

Pearce, R. (1992). World product mandates and MNE specialization. Scandinavian International Business Review, 1(2), 38-57.

Perlmutter, H. V. (1969). The tortuous evolution of the multinational corporation. Columbia Journal of World Business, 4(1), 9-18.

Perry, C. (1998). Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 32(9/10), 784-802.

Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). What is a Processual Analysis?. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337-348.

Picard, J. (1980). Organizational Structures and Integrative Devices in European Multinational Corporations. Columbia Journal of World Business, 15(1), 30-35.

Posner, M. V. (1961). International trade and technical change. Oxford Economic Papers, 13(3), 323-341.

Prahalad, C. K.. & Doz. Y. L. (1987). The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: The Free Press.

Reid, S. D. (1981). The decision-maker and export entry and expansion. Journal of International Business Studies, 12(2), 101-112.

Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London.

Root, F. R. (1990). International Trade and Investment, Volume 6. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Company.

Root, F. R. (1994). Entry Strategies for International Markets. San Francisco, CA: Lexington Books.

Roth, K., & Morrison A. J. (1992). Implementing global strategy: characteristics of global sub-sidiary mandates. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), 715-736.

Rugman, A. M. (1981). Inside the multinationals: The economics of internal markets. New York, NY: Columbia Press.

289

Rugman, A. M., & Bennett, J. (1982). Technology transfer and world product mandating in Can-ada. Columbia Journal of World Business, 17(4), 58-62.

Rugman, A. M., & Douglas, S. (1986). The Strategic Management of Multinationals and World Product Mandating. Canadian Public Policy, 12(2), 320-328.

Rugman, A. M., & Oh, C. H. (2010). Does the regional nature of multinationals affect the multi-nationality and performance relationship?. International Business Review, 19(5), 479-488.

Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (1992). A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4), 761-772.

Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2001). Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enter-prises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 237-250.

Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2004). A perspective on regional and global strategies of multi-national enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 3-18.

Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2005). Towards a theory of regional multinationals: a transac-tion cost economics approach. Management International Review, 45(1), 5-17.

Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2007). Liabilities of regional foreignness and the use of firm-level versus country-level data: A response to Dunning et al. (2007). Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 200-205.

Rugman, A. M., Verbeke, A., & Nguyen, Q. (2011). Fifty Years of International Business Theory and Beyond. Management International Review, 51(6), 755-786.

Rugman, A. M., Verbeke, A., & Yuan, W. (2011). Re-conceptualizing Bartlett and Ghoshal's Classification of National Subsidiary Roles in the Multinational Enterprise. Journal of Man-agement Studies, 48(2), 253-277.

Santangelo, G. D., & Meyer, K. E. (2011). Extending the Internationalization Process Model: Increases and Decreases of MNE Commitment in Emerging Economies. Journal of Interna-tional Business Studies, 42(7), 894-909.

Sargeant, L. W. (1990). Strategic planning in a subsidiary. Long Range Planning, 23(2), 43-54.

Schütte, H. (1996). RHQ of Multinational Corporations. PhD dissertation, St. Gallen: Universität St. Gallen.

Schütte, H. (1997). Strategy and Organisation: Challenges for European MNCs in Asia. Europe-an Management Journal, 15(4), 436-445.

Schweizer, R., Vahlne, J. E., & Johanson, J. (2010). Internationalization as an entrepreneurial process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8(4), 343-370.

Science Council of Canada (1980). Multinationals and Industrial Strategy: The Role of World Product Mandates. Ottawa: Sciences and Services Canada.

Shelby, A. (1986). The Theoretical Bases of Persuasion: A Critical Introduction. The Journal of Business Communications, 23(1), 5-29.

290

Shrader, R. C., Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (2000). How new ventures exploit trade-offs among international risk factors: lessons for the accelerated internationalisation of the 21st century. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1227-1247.

Simon, M. C. (2007). Der Internationalisierungsprozess von Unternehmen: ressourcenorientier-ter Theorierahmen als Alternative zu bestehenden Ansätzen. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universi-täts-Verlag.

Sminia, H. (2009). Process research in strategy formation: Theory, methodology and relevance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 97-125.

Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London.

Sousa, C. M. P., & Bradley, F. (2008). Cultural Distance and Psychic Distance: Refinements in Conceptualization and Measurement. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(5/6), 467-488.

Taggart, J. H., & Berry, M. J. (1997). Second Stage Internationalization: Evidence from MNC Manufacturing Subsidiaries in the UK. Journal of Marketing Management, 13(1-3), 179-193.

Tallman, S. (2003). The Significance of Bruce Kogut's and Udo Zander's Article, 'Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation'. Journal of Interna-tional Business Studies, 34(6), 495-497.

Tallman, S., & Chacar, A. S. (2011). Knowledge accumulation and dissemination in MNEs: a practice-based framework. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 278-304.

Teece, D. J. (1981). The Multinational Enterprise: Market Failure and Market Power Considera-tions. Sloan Management Review, 22(3), 3-17.

Teece, D. J., & Pisano, G. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction. Industri-al and Corporate Change, 3(3), 537-556.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Journal of Business, 59(4), 251-278.

Vahlne, J. E., Ivarsson, I., & Johanson, J. (2011). The tortuous road to globalization for Volvo's heavy truck business: Extending the scope of the Uppsala model. International Business Re-view, 20(1), 1-14.

Vahlne, J. E., Schweizer, R., & Johanson, J. (2012). Overcoming the Liability of Outsidership - The Challenge of HQ of the Global Firm. Journal of International Management, 18(3), 224-232.

Van Maanen, J. (1979). The Fact and Fiction in Organizational Ethnography. Administrative Sci-ence Quarterly, 24(4), 539-550.

Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarter-ly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190-207.

Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at Bay. New York, NY: Basic Books.

291

Weerawardena, J., Mort, G. S., Liesch, P. W., & Knight, G. A. (2007). Conceptualizing acceler-ated internationalization in the born global firm: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of World Business, 42(3), 294-306.

Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavalainen Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740 62.

Welch, L. S., & Luostarinen, R. K. (1988). Internationalization: evolution of a concept. Journal of General Management, 14(2), 36-64.

Welch, L. S., & Luostarinen, R. K. (1993). Inward-Outward Connections in Internationalization. Journal of International Marketing, 1(1), 44-56.

White, R. E., & Poynter, T. A. (1984). Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada. Busi-ness Quarterly, 48(4), 59-69.

Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY: Free Press.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Volume 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341-363.

292

8. Appendix 8.1. Interview guideline The following guideline was sent to each interviewee prior to the exchange and was used throughout the conduction of the semi-structured interviews. While the guideline allowed the interviewee to prepare for the discussion and the interviewer to structure his questions it did not seek to limit interview findings by any means. At the end of each interview the interviewee was further asked to answer a set of questions using a Likert scale. However, as most interviewees were hesitant to provide answer in such form due to potential sanctions of any kind from other MNC stakeholders the outcome was not used for the study. It should be further noted that the interview focus shifted from one case to another as findings from earlier cases urged the investi-gator to better understand certain aspects of subsidiary internationalization in the following cases.

Interview guideline

A. Description of the MNC and focal subsidiary Please provide a short overview about the MNC and subsidiary in focus (revenues, employees, geographical coverage, value-add, product range, organizational structure, inauguration date etc.). The aim of such introduction is to put the following case example into a larger context and to avoid potential misinterpretations.

B. Description of the international business opportunity in focus Please provide a short overview about the selected case of subsidiary internationalization. The overview should encompass type of opportunity, relevant dates with regards to the opportunity (identification, enactment, and exploitation), involved stakeholders, level of investment and/or resource requirements as well as outcome and current status of the initiative.

C. Identification of international business opportunity Chapter introduction

This chapter of the interview focuses on the initial part of the initiative, the identification of the international business opportunity. An international business opportunity is thereby defined as a foreign subsidiary’s possibility to expand its operations encompassing all value chain elements (R&D, sourcing, production, sales, after sales etc.) beyond its original host market. For any type of market expansion operational responsibility needs to be taken by the focal subsidiary.

Chapter questions

1) Where was the international business opportunity identified (focal subsidiary, other MNC units, MNC headquarter, other)?

2) How was the business opportunity for subsidiary internationalization identified? Please name the main drivers and potential restrictions throughout the identification process.

3) To what extend did internal (other MNC units) and / or external stakeholders (customers, suppliers, regulators, competitors etc.) influence the identification process?

D. Enactment of international business opportunity Chapter introduction

N. Lohr, Foreign Market Subsidiary Mandates, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-02668-4, © Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

293

This chapter of the interview focuses on the activities that were initiated once the international business opportunity was identified. The question about how the opportunity was exchanged be-tween involved MNC units is thereby of particular interest.

Chapter questions

4) Following the opportunity identification for subsidiary internationalization what next steps were initiated (business case calculation, trials etc.)? What role did the different stakeholders (focal subsidiary, other MNC units, MNC headquarter) take in this process?

5) Had the focal subsidiary launched previous initiatives for market expansion? If yes, please comment on the nature and outcome of these initiative(s). If not, please state the reason for lacking prior initiatives.

6) In general, do you believe that belonging to an MNC increases or decreases the proclivity of local management to act upon business opportunities outside the host market?

E. Allocation of resources towards the identified business opportunity Chapter introduction

This chapter of the interview focuses on the HQ decision to grant responsibility to the focal sub-sidiary for exploitation of the identified business opportunity with or without additional resource demand. Understanding the headquarter reasoning for a decentralized market expansion strategy is thereby of particular interest.

Chapter questions

7) For what reason was the focal subsidiary mandated to exploit the opportunity as opposed to exploiting it centrally from the MNC headquarters?

8) To what extend was the decision a result of a new headquarter strategy to maximize local resource exploitation as opposed to following a rather opportunistic approach?

9) To what extend did the prevalence of country-specific advantages (culture, customer de-mand, regulation, financial / tax-related matters etc.) of the focal subsidiary influence the decision-making process at headquarter level?

10) Did the focal subsidiary depend on additional resources in order to exploit the identified international business opportunity? If yes, please state amount and type of resources that were requested and allocated.

11) When reflecting on the process of responsibility allocation, what are key facilitators for subsidiaries to obtain foreign market responsibility?

F. Exploitation of international business opportunities and outlook Chapter introduction

This chapter of the interview focuses on the actual implementation and the outcome of the market expansion, including the level of headquarter involvement as well as the steps that were taken or are planned following the implementation

Chapter questions

12) How was the market expansion step prepared? To what extend was personnel from other MNC units (other MNC subsidiaries, MNC headquarters) involved in this process? To

294

what extend was experience from prior market expansions (1st and / or 2nd degree) lever-aged?

13) How was the market expansion implemented? To what extend was personnel from other MNC units, including headquarters, involved? To what extend was experience from prior market expansions (1st and / or 2nd degree) leveraged?

14) Do you view the implementation as a success or a failure? Please state the reasons for the outcome and steps that you would take differently given your current knowledge.

15) Following the implementation what next steps were initiated by the focal subsidiary and / or responsible headquarter? What are current medium to long-term plans?


Recommended