Date post: | 03-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | mona-a-al-nabahin |
View: | 248 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 25
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
1/25
E S C A L A T I O N O F C O M M I T M E N T
GETTING OUT BEFORE ITS
TOO LATE
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
2/25
ESCALATION DEFINED
Escalation refers to persistence with a course ofaction beyond a rationally defensible point.
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
3/25
EXAMPLES OF ESCALATION
You dont go into business to give in
Last year was bad, year before was very bad, thisyear is disaster
If this goes on I shall have to do a runner
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
4/25
ESCALATION
Preconditions Costs are incurred
Feedback is negative
Opportunity to quit or
continue Consequences of quitting
or continuing areunknown
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
5/25
CAUSES OF ESCALATION
Psychological
Social
Economic
Organizational
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
6/25
PSYCHOLOGICAL CAUSES
How does escalation start?
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
7/25
ORIGINS OF ESCALATION
Bright promises entrepreneurs allow their enthusiasmto over-ride their judgement.
Consequently they may fail to do sufficient reality testingto check their plans are realistic.
They may be so determined to set up in business that theyscale up possible sales so that the business plan makessense on paper.
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
8/25
PLANS
Fail to take full account of costs, rent, rates, cost ofsupplies, staffing costs.
Failure to compute a proper cash flow analysis.
Overly optimistic estimates of level and rate ofreturns likely to be generated by the business.
Inadequate knowledge of the nature of the business
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
9/25
ESCALTION
Ego-defensiveness need to appear rational
Framing effects
Sunk costs
Dislike of waste
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
10/25
EGO
Refers to fear of failure.
Reluctance to admit to making a mistake.
Overly inflated view of ones capabilities recall
illusion of control. Desire to be proved right.
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
11/25
EGO AND INFORMATION
When decision-makers ego are at stake they may notadjust their views to keep up with new information.
This typically means decision-makers pay moreattention to feedback that supports their views.
Downplay or even ignore information suggestingpersistence is futile as expectations cannot be met.
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
12/25
FRAMING
Prospect theory predicts that decision-makers areinfluenced by how a problem is expressed(framed).
When a business fails decisions are likely to benegatively framed, that is, as a choice betweenlosses.
Negative framing results in risk seeking behaviour.
To be risk seeking is to take a bigger risk thanobjective conditions warrant.
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
13/25
FRAMING
In practice:
Closing a venture meansaccepting a definitelosswhereas persisting offers thechance of avoiding that lossaltogether but at the risk ofsubsequently incurring a much
bigger one. Prospect theory predicts that a
loss that is merely probable ispreferable to one that isdefinite.
Escalation enables decisionmakers to avoid a definite loss.
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
14/25
MONEY SUNK AND LOST
Sunk costs refer to investments made in anticipationof revenue streams.
Strictly speaking they should usually be ignored in
deciding how to invest resources in future becausethey cannot influence outcomes.
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
15/25
FOR EXAMPLE..
1. Cost of converting house to corner shop = 40 000(sunk cost).
2. Shop generates income of 100 a week.
3. Stocking supermarket shelves = 300 a week.
Note, in deciding between 2 and 3, sunk costs make nodifference.
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
16/25
TO PUT IT ANOTHER WAY
The choice is between: Earning 100 a week inshop.
Earning 300 a week insupermarket.
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
17/25
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
18/25
PSYCHOLOGY OF SUNK COSTS
What we can accept intellectually we cannot alwaysaccept emotionally.
We may persist out of psychological attachment to
sunk costs and because we dislike waste.
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
19/25
FOR EXAMPLE
Holding on to old stock.
Refusing to sell a business because of all the timeand effort invested.
Even when closing down, throwing things awayrather than accept a small sum of money.
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
20/25
SOCIAL CAUSES OF ESCALATION
Escalation may be fuelled by the presence of anaudience.
Audience effects can drive escalation even though
decision-makers have begun to recognise thatpersistence is most probably futile because it isalready clear that expectations cannot be met.
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
21/25
SOCIAL CAUSES OF ESCALATION
Competition the dollar auction.
Needing to look good in public
Perceived need to be consistent
Valuing leaders who appear strong and decisive
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
22/25
ECONOMIC CAUSES OF ESCALATION
It can be as expensive to quit as to continue
Low salvage value
High closing costs, e.g., tied in to a lease on
premises, redundancy costs Project may be nearing completion
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
23/25
ESCALATION
Politics vested interests may try to concealfailure and/or perpetuate project.
Sheer weight of institutions as project gainsmomentum whole departments may have beencreated to support it.
Project closely identified with values and purposesof organization.
Administrative inertia - just too much trouble tointervene.
NOTE: these usually only apply in large businesses
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
24/25
AVOIDING ESCALATION
Be careful what you get into: remember the planningfallacy
Monitor projects carefully Set clear expectations and compare results against those
expectations Set limits Change the project managers Separate authorization from evaluation Set quitting points Real options thinking see separate slides Think of projects as a series of investments beginning
now
8/12/2019 713 Escalation
25/25
AVOIDING ESCALATION CONTd
What are the marginal costs of completion?
What are the marginal benefits?
Pay attention to the opportunity costs of persistence What are the alternatives?
What are the reputational costs of switching?
Base decisions on net gain
If an opportunity offering bigger gains becomesavailable, it makes economic sense to quit even asuccessfulventure.