CABINET-IN-CONFIDENCE
Memorandum 7 152
C A B I N E T M I N U T E
Canberra, 25 June 1990
No. 13865
Furthering State Involvement in Microeconomic Reform
The Cabinet noted the Memorandum.
Copy No. 48
Secretary to Cabinet
This document is the property of the Australian Government and is not to be copied or reproduced
CABINET-IN-CONFIDENCE
[1]
Title
Date
Originating Department(s)
CABINET -IN-CONFIDENCE
~ FOR CABINET MEMORANDUM No __ 71j.j --~
COPY No.··········-······ .. . ..
FURTHERING STATE INVOLVEMENT IN MICROECONOMIC REFORM
15 June 1990
Treasury, Finance, Prime Minister and Cabinet and Industrial Relations
Cabinet Minute No 13682 (SA) of 1 May 1990 requested a further paper on progressing State
._..I . ..:l.....,,\UJ-"'jjoo,( ...,._,_ . , .· • • .., reform.
Legislation
Consultation: Departments consulted
Is there agreement?
Cost: . This fiscal year . year 2 . year 3
o examine Commonwealth options to progress State microeconomic reform and to describe a ~ strategy for consideration involving fiscal and ~ non-fiscal aspects.
Attorney-General's Department (A-Gs) advises that no legislation is needed to give effect to the conclusions. (A-Gs prepared ATTACHMENT Don the Commonwealth's non-fiscal legislative · powers.)
N/A
N/A
N/A
------~----------------------------~ 11067/85 This document is the property of the Australian Government and is not to be copied or reproduced
CABINET-IN-CONFIDENCE . II&.
[2]
\.UUIIItH ·111-\.0iliiU~nUJ
2
BACKGROUND
Ministers have examined Cabinet Memorandum No 7012 of
27 April 1990 which discussed the importance of encouraging
the States and Territories in further microeconomic reform
(major points summarised at ATTACHMENT A).
2. As a result, Ministers agreed (Minute No 13682 (SA) of
1 May 1990) that the Departments of Treasury, Finance, Prime
Minister and Cabinet and Industrial Relations undertake
further work on Commonwealth options to progress State
microeconomic reform through both consultation and more
material measures. This Memorandum examines those options
and describes a strategy to involve the States in further
reform.
3. The strategy involves a mix of fiscal and non-fiscal
levers. The evidence of the last few years is that placing
the States under fiscal pressure has necessitated their
undertaking some microeconomic reform. Officials also felt
that there was considerable scope to use non-fiscal levers to
pursue State microeconomic reform, focusing on existing
consultative and other suitable fora, in particular the
Industry Commission, and perhaps extending to a special
Premiers' Conference on microeconomic reform after the
Commonwealth budget.
STATE REFORMS
4. Details of the States• initiatives to enhance the
performance of a number of their GBEs are contained in
ATTACHNEBT B. In an overall sense New South Wales is
currently involved in the most far-reaching program of
reform, covering grain handling, the railways, electricity
generation, ports, urban transport, and rural water supply.
States such as Western Australia and Tasmania do not appear
to be pursuing change as actively as the rest, while Victoria
and South Australia have undertaken some limited reform of
electricity generation, the ports and water supply. Victoria
has also undertaken some rationalisation of its
non-metropolitan rail services.
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[3]
.. La brnet -In-Confidence 3
5. At the individual industry level, most current change
seems to be taking place in the ports where, under the weight
of the Commonwealth's waterfront initiatives, the States more
generally are engaged in activities to reform pricing
structures, rationalise workforces, improve profitability and
manage their assets more efficiently. Nationally, further
scope for change exists in most States in the areas of
electricity generation, the railways, urban transport, water
supply and land development reform (with local government).
Even in New South Wales there is considerable distance to
travel on the reform path.
What is inf luencing the refoPD process at the State and
Territory l e v e l?
6. Factors advancing the pace of reform:
(a) the States are beginning to see the need for reform and
to recognise that microeconomic reforms are themselves
worth pursuing for their net benefits;
(b) fiscal discipline by the Commonwealth has encouraged
the States to seek efficiencies in their activities;
and
(c) Commonwealth reforms have provided a lead (but further
Commonwealth reform is essential to maintain the
momentum).
7. Factors impeding the pace of reform:
(a) there are inherent difficulties faced by both the
Commonwealth and the States in unwinding entrenched
interests and inefficiencies;
(b) there is residual resistance to change because of the
perGeived difficulties in capturing electoral credit
for reforms when the costs are immediate but the
benefits accrue slowly; and
(c) the scope for concerted reform is not sufficiently
understood.
Union attitudes
8. The States need to adopt industrial relations
strategies that address the key issues in achieving improved
efficiency in the workplace and secure the involvement and
co-operation of the trade union movement. Trade unions have
Cabinet -In-Confidence ,
[4]
Cabinet -In-Confidence 4
demonstrated a willingness to co-operate in the reform
process: where they are effectively involved in the planning
and implementation of labour restucturing programs; and
where the benefits of reform are clear to the union
membership in terms of skill enhancement, better training,
improved career prospects and appropriate mechanisms for
dealing with displaced employees. ATTACHMENT C provides
further detail.
Consti tut i onal Limitat i ons 9. The Constitution limits the scope of the Commonwealth
to take direct action in engaging the States in reforms
within areas of State responsibility. The Commonwealth does
not possess plenary power over the economy (including over
microeconomic reform). However, it possesses a number of
powers, ranging from the 'Territories' to the 'Defence'
power, to pursue (either directly or indirectly)
microeconomic reform in certain areas within State control.
The formulation of practical and politically acceptable
policies utilising these powers is, of course, another
matter. And the regulatory approach implicit in examples
that come to mind is antithetical to micro reform.
10. Existing legislation such as the Pr ices Su rve illance
Act 1983 and the Tr ade Practices Act 19 47 could be amended to
cover the States and State GBEs, subject to relevant
Constitutional prohibitions and guarantees. However, as
evidenced by the States' strong resistance to any application
of the Trade Practices Act to their activities, any such
extensions would face strong opposition. But the States
could tap into the expertise of, say, the Prices Surveillance
Authority on an informal basis.
11. ATTACHMENT D provides more detail.
COMMONWEALTH OPTIONS
FISCAL .MEASURES
12. When the Treasurer brings forward his submission on the
offer to the .states at the Premiers' Conference for consideration, Ministers may wish to consider the incentive
and pressure which might be exerted on the States to
accelerate the process of microeconomic reform. The level of
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[5]
\.UUII1tii-UI-\.UIIIIU~IIl6
5
both grants and borrowings can influence the States. Options
to continue the progress achieved by using the Commonwealth
fiscal leverage over the States in recent years are discussed
below.
A. Continuing the degree of general fiscal restraint when
providing general purpose payments to the States.
(i) This would maintain pressure on the States to
improve the efficiency of their business
enterprises. Subsidies paid by the State
general government to their business
undertakings totalled $2.4 bil)ion in 1987-88 -
at around 5 per cent of general government
outlays this provides a measure of the potential
for improved efficiency of States' business
undertakings to benefit the States' financial
position.
(ii) One option could be to justify a real reduction
in general revenue grants in 1990-91 by
specifically referring to the scope for enhanced
efficiency in State enterprises and to
foreshadow modest real declines in general
purpose payments over the medium term on these
grounds.
(iii) The Treasurer's Premiers• Conference/Loan
Council submission will address these and
related issues.
B. Instruct the Commonwealth Grants Commission to exclude
certain State business undertakings (not so far
excluded) from the scope of fiscal equalisation.
(i) This will ensure individual States bear the full
consequences of their inefficient business
undertakings.
(ii) This is, however, not something that can be
implemented immediately or in the near term,
without overturning a timetable agreed at the
1989 Premiers' Conference for regular reviews of
Grants Commission methodology. The Grants
Commission is examining this issue in its
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[6]
lu o1ne1 -ln-lonnaence 6
current inquiry into methodology. After the
Commission's report is received in June 1990 the
Commonwealth and States will discuss the terms
of reference for the Commission's next major
review of general revenue grant relativities.
One option will be for the terms of reference to
direct the Commission to exclude business
undertakings from its assessment with effect
from the beginning of the next quinquenium
1993-94. This option will need to be considered
in the context of the Grants Commission's
overall conclusions and recommendations, but
Commonwealth ~nterest in this proposal could be
foreshadowed in the Premiers' Conference context
as the Commonwealth's tentative position in the
expectation that this would provide an incentive
to the States to accelerate their GBE reforms.
C. Provide a certain amount of money for specific purpose
grants tied to micro-reforms in specific areas - eg
finance redundancies, develop infrastructure, training.
(i) This option would provide States with more
capacity and incentive to undertake micro-reform.
(ii) Although the financial pay-offs for the States
of micro-reforms can be substantial they may
emerge slowly, whereas the present costs of
reforms can be significant. Any additional
funding would desirably contain "sunset clauses"
so the commitment is not open-ended.
(iii) However, dangers in the Commonwealth's adopting
an interventionist approach and attempting to
'buy• reform from the States include: it
encourages the perception that the Commonwealth
is responsible for reform, rather than the
States. Joint Commonwealth/State involvement
may also mean no Government accepts
responsibility for the success or failure of reform . It involves the Commonwealth in
detailed administration of reform - eg which
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[7]
lODtner -ln-Lontldence 7
projects would be eligible for funding -
something which is best left to the States.
Each State will demand a 'share' of the
assistance regardless of whether all have high
priority projects warranting funding.
(iv) If the specific purpose grants were an addition
to general revenue assistance otherwise payable
to the States there would be a cost to the
Commonwealth's Budget and to macroeconomic
policy settings and less financial pressure on
the States to undertake micro-reform in the first place. If the specific purpose grants
were funded from a further reduction in general
revenue grants the impact on some, particularly
the smaller States, could be large and it would
reduce States' Budget flexibility.
(v) There should not be any need to buy
microeconomic reform, as it should provide its
own fiscal benefits to the States. Providing
grants would doubly reward the States. However
costs tend to be up front, and benefits can be
slow to accrue, which suggests the need to
finance reform. Financing reform through
borrowings has the added benefit that it
encourages the States to ensure that the
benefits of reform are attained to fund its
financing.
D. Tie a certain amount of the Global Borrowing Limit
allocated to States to micro-reform in specific areas.
(i) This option also provides States with more
capacity to finance micro-reform where the major
pay-offs are in the future.
(ii) It has the advantage, relative to grants, that
States have to ensure that the reform can pay
its way. It means that there is less danger of
States undertaking projects simply to get a
Commonwealth hand-out and less requirement for
the Commonwealth to closely administer access to
funds. Any special Global Limit allocation for
this purpose could be temporary.
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[8]
\.UUIII~I-UI•\.UIIIIU~IIlt:S
8
(iii) States currently allocate their global limits
according to their own priorities - including
projects which are directed at micro-reform.
Individual States can also seek special
additions to their global limits from Loan
Council, if they have large reform projects
which cannot be accommodated within their
existing limit. The Treasurer's Premiers'
Conference/Loan Council submission will be
considering the level and distribution of the
States' global borrowing limit.
(iv) Establishing a special category of global limits
for micro-reform:
(a) may lead to pressures for a significant
expansion of the overall Global Limit,
something which may be inconsistent with
the requirements of macroeconomic policy;
(b) would decrease States' flexibility to
allocate their total borrowing program
between the "best" projects; and
(c) would give the States the incentive to
spend the money on relatively less
worthwhile projects since it is not
available for other purposes (although this
should be moderated by the need to finance
the borrowings) perhaps needing to apply
lower rates of return to proposals for
borrowings for reform.
NOH-FISCAL MEASURES
13. The Commonwealth could take a number of non-fiscal
measures to encourage further progress.
Premiers • Conference/Loan Counci l (PC/LCl
14. The Prime Minister's letter to the Premiers advising
them of the date of the PC/LC noted that some initial
discussion of microeconomic reform at the Conference could
usefully promote co-operation on these matters. As the Prime
Minister's letter suggests, PC/LC processes would need to be
limited to a general scene-setting discussion of micro reform
which could:
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[9]
9
(a) acknowledge the importance of micro reforms in the
Commonwealth and State Government economic strategy and
for the future wellbeing of the community; and
(b) emphasise the need for Commonwealth/State co-operation
and that we can learn from, and assist, each other.
Speci al Pre miers • Conference o n Micro reform
15. An additional option is for the Prime Minister to
invite the States, if there are indications of sufficient
interest, to participate in a special Premiers' Conference on
micro reform. One of the States could host the Conference
while others could lead on chosen items, but the Commonwealth
would need to be in the Chair. Attendance would be limited
to heads of Government - ie this would not be a "Summit" with
business, unions, etc participation but focus on State
governments.
16. A number of States could be invited to present papers
on their experiences with micro reform to expose best
practices and, indirectly, bad practices or laggards and to
draw on each other's experiences. States could also be
invited to suggest agenda items for discussion and for future
Commonwealth/State consideration and co-operation. Attention
would need to be given to reform of strategic industry
sectors within State areas of responsibility, while placing
the onus upon the States to bring forward reform proposals.
However, areas where joint Commonwealth/State action is
imperative (especially road/rail reform) could also be
covered.
17. The States will have a number of criticisms of
Commonwealth policy towards them with efficiency implications
which they may want to see put on the agenda, for example:
(a) duplication by the Commonwealth of State regulation,
taxation and administration; and
(b) the poor and distorting revenue bases the Commonwealth.
leaves to the States.
18. The objective of such a Conference should be largely to
raise community awareness of the need for micro reform and
the issues involved. It would need to be clear that it could
not reopen the fiscal parameters already established for
1990-91 (indeed State budgets would largely be bedded down by
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[10]
LODiner -ln-lonfidence 10
the time of any special conference). Nevertheless, it is
inevitable that States will see the occasion as a platform
for discussing financial needs. A Commonwealth overview
paper (together with other papers on specific issues) could
be distributed well before the Conference which could set its
parameters.
Other Commonwealth/State Consultative Mechanisms
19. There are various major consultative committees,
consisting of Ministers and senior officials, in areas
targeted for microeconomic reform. These are listed in
ATTACHMENT E. They could be further utilised for promoting
the importance of structural reform to the States, for
drawing attention to State advances in micro reform, and to
allow comparisons of progress between the States. In
particular, they provide avenues for addressing a wide range
of regulatory impediments to efficiency brought about by
unco-ordinated activities and objectives of the Commonwealth
and the States. Ministers have, for example, recently
addressed a better way of handling food regulation.
Economic Planning and AdVisory Council
20. There are ongoing opportunities to utilise EPAC
meetings and EPAC research to provide informed public debate
on structural reform. For example, as well as its recent
paper on microeconomic reform, EPAC has in train a discussion
paper entitled "Federal/State overlap in functions and
regulations", which will seek to bring together the views of
State and Commonwealth agencies. If there were to be a
Special Premiers' Conference EPAC could be asked to
contribute a paper (or papers), eg drawing on its recent
publications.
Indust~ Commission
21. As the Commonwealth's major review and inquiry body on
industry matters, the Industry Commission is set to play a
key role as a catalyst for structural change in Australia.
The Commission's current work program - which extends to the
end of 1991 - includes a number of references which involve
significant State interests, particularly the recent
references sent to the Commission dealing with energy
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[11]
Cabinet -In-Confidence 11
generation and distribution, rail transport, and statutory
marketing arrangements. The States a~d Territories have been
consulted on the terms of reference for these three important
inquiries. The full work program of the Commission is at
ATTACHMENT F.
22. The Industry Commission can be used as an educational
tool and to exert persuasive pressure for reform on the
States . The potential for the Commission to involve the
States in reform could be increased:
(a) by inviting the States to propose topics for inclusion
in the Industry Commission's rolling forward work
program (next considered by Ministers in July/August
for announcement by ~he Treasurer in the Budget
context). The Prime Minister could write to States and
Territories accordingly;
(b) in its yearly review of microeconomic reform in various
sectors of the economy, the Industry Commission could
provide information on progress by the States and
Territories. This would expose States to pressure to
match progress made by other governments;
(c) Commission resources could be made available at a
State's request to provide particular expertise on
specific microeconomic reforms;
(d) staff interchange arrangements could be formalised; and
(e) the States could be approached to propose names of
experts that could be seconded to the Commission, on
the understanding that individuals would be considered
on their merits and not employed/appointed in a State
representative capacity.
Microeconomic Reform in t he Medi um Te rm
23. There may be more scope for the Commonwealth to take
additional measures to encourage the States to undertake
microeconomic reform in the period beyond the current
budgetary cycle.
(a) The Industry Commission is scheduled to report in 1991
on statutory marketing arrangements for primary
products, energy generation and distribution, and rail
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[12]
\.U UII n:a -ui-\.UIIIIUtill\.ti
12
transport. The Commonwealth may have scope to assist the States, if necessary, in the implementation of some
of the more difficult and costly recommendations that
may flow from these reports.
(b) The States could also be asked to develop specific
proposals which could be considered on their respective
merits at next year's Premiers' Conference, ie not at
the proposed special Premiers' Conference.
(c) Pressure will continue in the medium-term for the
Commonwealth to "seed" reform through specific purpose
grants. This is likely to come to a head in addressing
the proposal for a national freight initiative for
rail. Further, road funding may, as recommended by the
Inter-State Commission report, involve changes to the
way in which the Commonwealth and States share revenue
raising and expenditures. If the Commonwealth were in
a position to announce (eg in the next Budget) in
principle decisions on those matters, then the detail
of fiscal commitments would need to be worked out for
future years. These aspects are in addition to the
medium term impact of the fiscal options.
CONCLUSIONS
24. Given the key and significant role of State business
enterprises in the economy outlined in the previous
Memorandum No 7012, officials are of the view that the
package of measures along the lines discussed in this
Memorandum has much to commend it. On balance the measures
which officials assessed as meriting the consideration of
Ministers are:
(a) maintaining the fiscal pressure on the States through
the Premiers' Conference and the Loan Council. It
would be more appropriate for pressure to continue to
be exerted through grants, with sufficient room left in
borrowings to allow the funding of reform. It should
be made clear to the States that the needs of
microeconomic reform have been taken into account in
setting the global limits;
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[13]
r...oolneT-In-lonTiaence 13
(b) encourage microeconomic reform through existing
consultative fora, including EPAC, by making the
resources of the Industry Commission available to the States, and through a special Premiers' Conference on
microeconomic reform, the objective being both to make
the benefits of reform more transparent, and to assist
the States in implementing reform;
(c) offering the States access to the services of the
Prices Surveillance Authority on an informal basis.
25. Officials felt that it would not be wise to attempt to
set agendas for the States. States need to make their own
difficult choices, and face the trade-offs between reforms
with high rates of return, and those with wider microeconomic
benefits.
26. The Premiers' Conference presents an ideal opportunity
to raise further the profile of microeconomic reform, and to
impart some momentum:
(a) the Treasurer may consider emphasising the need for
microeconomic reform in his scene-setting remarks, and
making a very close link between the offer to the
States and their major role in the reform process:
(i) to be followed up by the usual haggling process,
and the consideration of 'special additions' to borrowings;
(ii) it would also present an opportunity to ~ the
Commonwealth's interest in pursuing the
efficiency issues currently the object of the
Grants Commission's methodology, eg the
exclusion of GBEs from the relativity
calculations;
(iii) it would also be an opportunity to signal the
Commonwealth's desire to encourage and assist
the States in the reform process through
appropriate consultative mechanisms.
27. The Commonwealth could indicate that its support
extended to participating in a special Premiers• Conference
on the strategy and mechanics of microeconomic reform should
the States want it:
(a) on the understanding that the fiscal parameters would
not be up for renegotiation;
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[14]
Cabinet -In-Confidence 14
(b) the aim of the conference would oe to focus on
strategic industry sectors to exchange information on
best practice issues;
(c) officials felt that if such a conference was held, the
Commonwealth would need to have tight control over the
agenda;
(d) one of the States could be invited to host the
conference with the Commonwealth retaining the Chair.
28. In the medium-term, once in-principle decisions are
made on road and rail reform, the detail of fiscal
arrangements will need addressing.
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[15]
Cabinet -In-Confidence 15
ATTACHMENT A
MAJOR POINTS OF RELATED CABINET MEMORANDUM
Cabinet Memorandum No 7012 noted that:
the States - and especially their GBEs - have a very significant impact on the national economy and the success of the Commonwealth's structural reform program depends in an important way on State participation;
unwinding entrenched interests and inefficiencies is no easier for the States than it is for the Commonwealth. And reform can bring adjustment costs. But the net benefits of microeconomic reform in terms of overall resource allocation and national welfare are substantial:
the IAC has estimated that microeconomic reform could raise Australia's real GDP over time by 5 per cent (even without allowing for dynamic benefits). Reforms at the State level contribute significantly to achieving these gains;
the pursuit of broad-based structural reform, with its advantages in lowering net adjustment costs (as each sector finds adjustment easier to the extent it benefits from efficiency gains in other adjusting sectors) and in achieving equitable burden sharing (so that no one sector feels it is being singled out for adjustment) is enhanced by State participation in reform processes.
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[16]
ELECTRICITY GENERATION AND SUPPLY
Corporate structure/ ministerial oversight
r"\ Q a::r -· :::s CD ~
I -:::s I ,...._
ElecUCJtity pricing
= ...... -· c.. CD ~ ~ CD
New South Wales
The Electricity Commission (Elcom) is responsible to the Minister for Minerals and Energy for power generation and its bulk transmission throughout New South Wales. 25 local governnent authorities distribute electricity within their areas of responsibility except to several large industrial consumers and the SRA which are supplied direct by Elcom. Moves are afoot to corporatise Elcom and to rationalise the county councils' operations.
Elcom charges a uniform bulk rate tariff to the local government authorities regardless of the cost of supply to particular areas. Local government authority charges are approved by the Minister and take account of each authority's different cost structure.
Victoria
The State; Electricit'y Commission is a body corporate operating under the State Electricity Conmission Act. Conmissioners, appointed by the Minister for Industry Technology and Resources, are responsible for the operations of the Conmission.
Generally uniform tariffs within classes regardless of the cost of supply. Steps are, however, being taken to reduce the cross-subsidisation of domestic and rural consumers. The average increase in prices is not to exceed the Melbourne CPI increase for the previous year.
Queensland
The Queensland Electricity Commission (QEC) set up under the Electricity Act and reporting to the Minister for Resources is responsible for the generation and transmission of electricity to seven electricity boards and certain major customers. The Minister for Resources recently announced an inquiry into QEC, the first since 19n.
The QEC is required to set 'fair and reasonable prices' and to seek to equalise progressively prices throughout the State within particular tariff groups. QEC has a goal of limiting tariff increases to half those of the CPI until 1994.
Western Australia
The State Energy Conmission of Western Australia (SECWA) is responsible to the Minister for Economic Developnent and Trade for the supply of electricity and gas in Western Australia.
SECWA is to have regard to the special needs of persons who reside outside the cities and the townships. Uniform tariffs within classes apply regardless of the cost of supply. SECWA plans to hold tariff increases below the level of increases in the
Perth CPl.
South Australia
The Electricity Trust of South Australia (ETSA) set up under its own Act is responsible to the Minister for Mines and Energy for the prodJct ion and distribution of electricity in South Australia.
Some restructuring of tariffs took effect from 1 July 1988 following a review of energy pricing and tariff structures. Nonetheless, uniform tariffs within classes apply, regardless of the cost of supply continues.
ETSA has sought to restrain tariff
increases below the increase in the CPI in recent years.
Tasmania
The Hydro-Electric Conmission is a statutory body administered by a Board of Conmissioners responsible to the Minister for Resources and Energy.
Prices are set to encourage industrial and commercial activity in Tasmania. Uniform tariffs within classes regardless of the cost of supply. Tariff increases have been held below increases in the CPI in recent years. A review of tariffs is being
considered, however, given the parlous position of Tasmania's finances.
Northern Territory
The Power and Water Authority (PAWA) is responsible for the generation and supply of electricity throughout the Territory. It reports annually to the Minister in accordance with the provisions of the Financial Administration and Audit Act.
Uniform tariffs within classes
-· :::s C'D .....
I -::s I ,...._
0 :::s ...... apply, regardless -· of the cost of C.. supply. Electricity~ prices have been ~ restrained since C'D 1986.
t
' t • • . c
[17]
Employment and work practices
t "~ n Clate of return :Grgets .and :::alit.n t lrlg
~tices ::::(..,
'""' CD
New South Yates
Elcom is hoping to complete a 30 per cent reduction in its workforce over the past two years by 30 June. It is considered that there is scope for further staff reductions and irrproved efficiencies through the elimination of restrictive work practices and revised shift work arrangements. Some contracting out has been t.ndertaken and greater use of private colleries is being made for fuel supplies.
No explicit financial targets have been set for Elcom except that it should endeavour to reduce costs in real terms and achieve an appropriate return on assets. It is required to pay a dividend to the State Government . Its accounts are based on historical cost conventions and are constructed on an accrual basis.
Victoria
Some sl ighi: reductions were made in employment levels in the five years to the end of 1988-89. The Conmission has pi ans to shed a further 3000 workers by 30 Jt.ne 1990.
The SECV is required to achieve a real rate of return on the wr i tt en do1«1 replacement cost of assets of 4 per cent and pay a dividend of up to 5 per cent of public equity.
Queensland
Errployment has been reduced by over 30 per cent since the end of the 1983-84 financial year. Restrictive. work practices have been reduced and greater recourse has been had to outside contractors.
At this point in time, QEC is not obliged to meet a financial target or to pay a dividend to the ·State Government.
\~estern Australia
SECYA has increased its workforce in recent years but rising output has seen productivity levels increasing.
A 3 per cent levy applies to specific metered sales of electricity. Apart from this, SEC\IA is not required to meet any other financial target. Its accounts are constructed having regard to historical costs and accrual methods.
South Australia
ETSA has reduced its workforce only marginally in recent years. Indeed, in the middle of the 1980s productivity irrprovements were non-existent.
ETSA is not obliged, at this time, to meet any financial or dividend targets. Consideration is, however, being given to setting it a rate of return target. A levy equivalent to 5 per cent of revenue from electricity sales is paid to the South Australian Treasury.
Tasmania
The HEC has reduced its workforce by over 15 per cent since 30 June 1985. It plans to further reduce its workforce in future years.
A 5 per cent surcharge is irrposed on all retail electricity sales except for pensioner accot.nts. A separate consurrption levy paid to State Treasury applies to major industrial users. No other financial requirements are placed on the HEC.
Northern Territory
PAYA increased its workforce in the year to the end of J~.r~e 1989.
PA\IA is required to strive for full cost recovery. Because it contirues to be unprofitable it is not obliged to remit a dividend to the Northern Territory Government.
[18]
Other measures to enhance performance
....
New South \.lales
The New South Uales GoverllllCnt is plaming to corporatise Elcom ard to draw increasing quantities of power from private sector SLppl i ers as a means of encouraging competition in the SLpply of electricity.
Victoria
Like New South: \.lales, Victori'a is planning to de-commission old plant when Loy Yang B comes on stream to reduce overall costs.
Queensland
The Queensland Government ' has been involved in negotiations to sell the Gladstone Power Station to a private sector operator who, in a move to engender some competition, would then sell some of its output into the State grid •
\.lestern Australia South Australia
lntercomection facilities have been developed between South Australia, Victoria ard New South Uales as a means to sharing the capital costs of meeting their demand for electricity.
Tasmania Northern Territory
PA\.IA has sought private sector involvement in the provision of power lines, etc as a means of containing cost pressures and restricting d~nds on limited public. sector investment funds.
. ;
[19]
RAJ LIJAYS
Corporate structure/ ministerial oversight
. r-"\ ca cr -· ::s CD .....
I -::s I
r-"\ 0 ~ -· ca.. CD = s
New South IJales
The State Rail Authority consists of Cityrail (for suburban/inter-urban passenger services) and Colntry link (freight and country passenger services- includes sane bus services). Perfonnance indicators are ptbl ished in the anrua l report. Goverrment approval is required of price changes, while ministerial approval for capital investment is required. The investment of surplus funds is restricted to certain areas. In 1988 the NSW Conmission of Audit identified lack of ministerial support for rationalisation proposals as a reason for lack of progress cllri ng a l"lllliler of administrations.
Victoria
Ministerial control of passenger service prices. Investments over $2m require ministerial approval. For metropolitan services, the 15 year plan, MetPlan was released in 1988. The State Transport Authority Plan (STAP) is still being evaluated.
Queensland
Ministerial control of capital investments. General price schedules require approval from the Governor in Council.
IJestern Australia
Ministerial control of capital investments. Price schedules and tendered freight rates must be approved by the Minister. There is currently a public consul tat ion process to develop a 25 year plan. Westrail is exempt from company tax, sales tax, vehicle registration and stamp duty on equipment leases.
[20]
Pricing/quality of service
.r'\ Q cr -· = CD ......
I -= I ~ 0 = ........ -· c::a.. CD :::1 s
New South Wales
The NSW Commission of Audit found that in the absence of adequate information on costs, the prices for freight and passenger services could not be set on a rational basis. Moreover, the full ext~t of i~l icit slhsidies camot be determined. Since 1988 there has been a withdrawal from uneconomic rural services, including line closures. Also, buses have replaced some existing rural passenger services. Cost recovery levels have, however, been low. Nonetheless, SRA is better than V-Line in freight and better than all other systems in metropolitan. It lags, however, in the country passenger area. The NSW government has said that although Booz Allen and Hami ton had "recommended an increase in fares, this was a matter for the government". Transport of coal and minerals will continue to be the major source of revenue, and, as such, attracts significant capital expenditure. The SRA is aiming to reduce coal freight rates by up to 2 per cent real a year over the next three years. It will also progressively eliminate cross-subsidisation in coal freights.
Victoria
Uneconomic non-urban passenger services have been replaced by bus services in some instances. There has also been an injection of capital to modernise rolling stock. Patronage on non-urban passenger services has increased significantly.
Queensland
Uneconomic services such as branch lines and certain
commodity freight is cross-subsidised by coal freight revenues. The pricing of coal includes a substantial royalty c~nt. In the year to June 1989 coal freight revenue was $780m
(70.4 per cent of total revenue). Most capital expenditure has been in the area of coal freight.
Western Australia
Prices for regulated freights are set at rates "which road
transport would charge ••• , assuming charges covered road track costs". Charges for large users are often set by
direct negotiation with the user (for exa~le, grain freight).
1\J 0
r c: c -( . . . . t c •
[21]
Errployment
Financial targets and
· accounting practices, etc
~ Q cr -· ::s CD .....
I -::s I
~ 0
~ -· c.. CD = s Other measures to enhance the commerci al environment
New South Wales
Since 1988 the workforce has been cut by 9, 000 ~l oyees. The current aim is to reduce the workforce by an additional 17,000 (45 per cent) in the next four years. This is presently underway.
The aim is to minimise revenue supplements. The government directly funds community service obligations. Accrual accounting on a historical cost basis. Arn.lal reports are on a commercial basis, by segment, including depreciation. The SRA recoups interest charges on capital from the Consolidated Fund. Debt has tended to be rolled over into new loans. No economic cost-benefit analysis was undertaken for either the XPT or Tangara.
S2.6b is being spent over four to five years on capital rehabilitation. This is an average annual increase of some $150m on the capital investment program for 1987-88. S2b will go to City Rail. Th is will be
spent on capi tal works, upgrading rolling stock, s ignalling, refurbishing stations and graff i t i/vandal ism crackdowns.
Victoria
In the past four years V/Line has shed 4,500 employees. By 1992 4,000 more will be shed (leaving 5,900). A substantial reduction in the suburban rail workforce may also take place in the near future. Notwithstanding a significant improvement in productivity, the lAC has found V/Line to have the lowest productivity of the four State rail systems.
The objective is to meet annual budget targets. The government directly funds community service obligations. Accrual accounting on an historical cost basis.
Queensland
In 1988 there was a reduction of 1,700 employees, and in 1989 1,605 employees were shed (down to 21,645). This was achieved through natural attrition.
Queensland Railways seek to achieve financial balance. No provision is made for depreciation. The government directly funds some passenger concessions and 1reight rates. There is a lack of segmentation in the reporting of operating results (for example, freight, urban, country passenger).
Western Australia
In the year to June 1989 there has been no real change in staff levels although in the five years to 30 June 1989 labour productivity increased by over 40 per cent.
Westrail has been required to achieve a profit on commercial activities in the shortest possible time. Community service obligations are directly funded.
t c t • • . c .
[22]
PORI AUTHOR I I JES
Corporate structure/ ministerial oversight
Port authority pricing
New South \lales
Minister oversees corporate goals and financial targets. Maritime Services Board is n~de up of four, largely autonanous, business units. The first corporate plan under current legislation outlines strategy, objectives and
targets for the three years from Jut y 1 1990. Senior ~nagement has recently been replaced.
A revised pricing structure based on user·pays principles will be introduced on July 1 1990. Reform will be gradual.
Victoria
Minister oversees strategy and major investments (and some day·to·day adninistrative matters). Each port authority has a corporate plan. Board members are chosen from interest groups.
A revised pricing structure will be
gradually introduced starting July 1 1990 at Melbourne. Other ports are reviewing their pricing and leasing structures.
Queensland
New government is reviewing the structure and operations of port authorities. The board and senior management of the Port of Brisbane Authority have been changed. Ministerial oversight has been on an ad hoc basis.
A consultant was retained to review pricir.s and leasing at all ports. The relevant task force has since been been disbanded.
South Australia
Department of Marine and Harbours is made up of business and support divisions, a strategic planning group and a regulatory/safety division. Each has objectives and perfor~nce
targets. Minister agrees to annual perfor~nce
(financial, ~rketing and service) targets.
User-pays principles are expected to be adopted in 1990·91.
Yestern Australia
Minister controls pricing, ~jor investments and rate of return targets. Each port authority has a corporate plan. Legislation is being prepared to allow ports greater commercial freedom.
fremantle is a iming to introduce a use•··pays system on July 1 1990. There is a review of other ports'
policies.
Tasmania
Authorities are highly independent (only increases in prices and capital investment funded by loans require government approval). New legislation would let the Minister control corporate planning and major capital investn~nts
of ports and amalga~te the B11rnie and Launceston authorities.
No specific review of pricing is being undertaken Rt present.
Northern Territory
Minister controls strategy, pricing guidelines and
major investments. Darwin Port Authority has a corporate plan.
No specific review of pricing is being undertaken at • present.
[23]
Enployult!nt
Rate of return targets and
accounting practices
c ~ :£' -:::f, ;,·a ' ...• . -'· ::::J . .. : .r-\ ·0 :' :S ...... ..... _..
CL. CD ::s s
Since 1986 there has been a
reduction in staff
of 14 per cent (to a full-t ime equivalent of 2974 in 1989).
Historical cost account ing. No rate of return target has been set. A dividend to the governnent of 6 per cent of revenue is paid.
Lorge decreases in port workforces in
the past tw~ years
have occurred (mainly because He l bourne has reduced its dredging operations and is rationalising its workshop). In 1988·89 Melbourne cut its workforce from 1424 to 1300 (-8.7 per cent).
Melbourne uses both historical cost and
current replacement cost accounting. Its target rate of return is 4 per cent real . The Port of Portland and the Port of Geelong authorities will be required to report on a real rate of return from 30 June 1990. Ports can be required to pay a div idend (maxirrun of 5 per cent).
-Staff at Brisbane In the five years has been cut fran to 30 June 1988 432 in 1976 to 251 there has been a
in 1989 red.Jct ion in staff (·42 per cent) . The from 789 to 690 situation in other (mostly at ports is unknown. Adelaide). A
further cut of
Historical cost accounting. No target rate of return has been set . Brisbane pays a levy on revenue to the governnent of 5.5 per cent.
24 per cent over the next four years is expected.
Current replacement cost accounting is being adopted. A target rate of return of about 8 per cent real is to be reached by
the end of 1992-93.
In the five years to 30 June 1988 there has been growth in staff
nunbers from 660 to 725 <largely at Fremantle). The Public Service Board has in the past cut workforces.
Historical cost accounting. The target rate of return is 3 per cent. A dividend may be paid to the Minister.
In the five years to 30 June 1988 there has been a
red.Jction in staff
from 419 to 345 (mainly at Launceston).
Historical cost accounting. The Harine Board of Hobart publishes its achieved rate of return (2.1 per cent nominal for 1989).
There was a reduct ion of one enployee in the . f ive year period to
30 June 1988 at Darwin.
Historical cost accounting. No rate of return target.
[24]
Other measures to enhance comncrc ial envi ronnent in
ports
r"'. Q
(:_¥ ~
* I
~ a -· g. = '""' .. CD
There is a rev iew of the possible sale of
unproductive assets and land (for example, the recent sale of i ts head office for $65m). Sane operations <pilotage) may be contracted out. Obsolete facilities have been redeveloped (example, Darling Harbour). The government directly stbsidises community service obligations.
Melbourne is rev iew ing its future land _.
requirements. It has been trying to sell the IJorld Trade Centre. In do ing so it has incurred substantial finance costs (for example, in the three years to 30 June 1989 finance charges were 5109.2m). It has reduced its dredging operations, is using contractors and rationalising its workshop operations. There are discussions over the rail-port interface (there is currently truck queues).
-At present there is no specific review into either asset
rationalisation or contracting out. They may be examined in a general government review. There is a review into land transport links.
In the last two years surplus land valued at $30m has
been transferred to other State agencies. Oredging is now carried out by contractors. Accounts separate comnunity service obligations fran coomer c i a l activities _
At present there is no specific review into asset
rationalisation.
New legislation will allow Fremantle to control the provision of towage and other serv ices by licensing . There is a rev iew into land transport links.
At present there is no specific review into either asset rationalisation or
contracting out.
At presL~t there is no specific review into either asset rationalisat ion or
contracting out . Accounts separate community service obligations from conmercial activities.
[25]
STATE GOVERNHENT-I:J.INED GRAIN IIANDLING ENIEI!PRISES
{')
j:, ,.....,. • -=
Corporate structure/ministerial overs ight
Grain handling and storage pricing
, I . 1'""':'\ E mp l oymen t
g ~ -· CL. CD = Q
New !jouth \Jales
The NS\J Grain Handling Authority was replaced by the NS\J Grain Corporation (GrainCorp) on 1 OCtober 1989. GrainCorp is incorporated under the Companies Code (NS\J). Its shares are owned by the Treasurer and four other Ministers ~ni nated by the Premier. The shareholders have appointed nine directors.
GrainCorp pri~es for its •services on a competitive, commercial basis .
Separate charges for domestic storage/handling services and export services were introduced in the f i nanc i a I year ended 30 Septenber 1989 •
Over the three years ended 30 September 1989:
- permanent staff numbers declined from 1089 to 528; and
casual staff numbers dropped from around 1250 to 800.
The new Port K~nbla terminal enploys very few permanent workers con~red wi th its predecessor, the Pyrmont terminal.
Victoria
The Grain Elevators Board (GEB) is a statutory authority and reports to the Victorian Parliament through the State Minister for Transport. The Treasurer of Victoria appoints a non-voting mcnber of the Board of Directors as his representative.
Annual increases in charges must be no greater than the increase in the Consumer Price Index.
GEB is rough! y 75 per cent down the road toward full user-pays pricing.
Over the three years ended 30 September 1989:
- permanent staff numbers fell from 611 to 397;
casual staff numbers declined from 151 to 51.
Queensland
Bulk Grains Queensland (BGQ) is a statutory authority and reports to the Queensland Parliament through the State Minister for Primary Industries. An officer of the oversighting department is a member of the Board of Directors.
Charges are reviewed annually .
BGQ policy is to offer conpetitive storage and handling charges.
Over the three years ended 30 September 1989:
permanent staff numbers fell from 701 to 472.
[26]
Rate of return ~argets and accounting practices
Other measures to enhance c~1mercial operations
...._, Nt!w South IJales
The ratio of after- tax return on shareholders' funds is considered to be the Corporation's primary indicator of commercial performance. GrainCorp's Statement uf Corporate Intent outlines performance targets for the next three years.
Conventions of historical cost accounting, however, are being adhered to in the preparation of financial statements.
Supplies unaudited accounts every six months to shareholders.
Closure of smaller receival sites.
Maximising the use of casual labour.
Productivity targets.
Market share targets.
Steps to increase revenue from the leasing of sites and the handling of grains other than wheat (diversification).
Victoria
GEB reports are based on both historical and current cost accounting conventions.
Its real rate of return on average assets in service in 1988-89 was negative; the target rate of return
set by the Victorian Government is 4 per cent real.
Greater attention to asset management.
Closure of silos in areas of very low production.
Redundancy packages.
leasing out storages which are surplus to requirements.
Queensland
BGO financial statea~nts are based on conventions of historical cost accounting.
No perforre~nre targets are established.
Marketing measures to attract beef feedlot grain into BGQ storages.
Diversification of handling and storage services.
Greater emphasis on in-house crop forecasting.
Industrial democracy.
Manpower reporting.
[27]
~TER AUTHORITIES · URBAN
Corporate structure/ ministerial oversight
r""\ Q c::r -· = CD .....
I
(!f
~ --....... --· ('<Q.. ' CD , ;::::s :S
~ater ' pricing
ref or~
New South Yales
The Minister for the Environn~nt is responsible for the act ivit ies of the Sydney Yater Board in the Sydney, lllawarra and Blue Mountains regions and the Hunter Yater Board in the Newcastle region of the State.
Attempts to introduce •user pays• pr icing have been opposed by the Minister for the Environment, Hr Moore.
Victoria
The Department of Yater Resources has the responsibility of oversighting the activities of 178 water bodies including the He I bourne and Metropolitan Board of Yorks (HHBY).
Some steps have been taken in tariff reform by the HHBY. It now has a fixed rate (based on property values) and an increasing two tier volumetric charge above 150 ld lol i tres. Non -metropolitan agencies, as a whole, have not as yet taken any steps on tar i ff reform. Cononerc i a l consumers continue to subsidise domestic consumers .
Queensland
The Minister for Primary Industries has the responsibility of oversighting the activities of the Queensland Yater Resources Commission (QYRC) and the Brisbane City Council.
A low percentage of residential property has installed meters which has been a significant impediment to the introduction of a rational user pays pricing scheme.
Yestern Australia
The Yater Authority of Yestern Australia is a public organisation responsible to the Minister for Yater Resources operating under the provisions of the Yater Authority Act 1984.
The authority is continuing the process of comprehensively reviewing tariff structures. The desire to move to •users pay•, however, is being balanced against the need to minimise the impact on individual consumers.
South Australia
In accordance with its charter, the Engineering and Yater Supply Department is essentially responsible for the management of the South Australian water industry. A
business plan was approved during the 1988·89 financial year.
Options for simplified charging arrangements have been identified for the water industry. The preferred approach is a system involving a service access charge plus a
pay-for-use component.
Tasmania
The Minister for Resources and Energy has the responsibility of oversighting the activities of the Hobart Regional Yater Board (HRYB) and the Rivers and Yater Supply
Conmission.
Little information avai I able but domestic consumers in Hobart are not metered.
Northern Territory
The Power and Yater Authority (PAYA) is responsible for supplying services • to 56 centres across the Territory. Annual reports, financial statements and
Auditors'·General reports are
submitted to the Minister in accordance with Section 68 of the financial Administration and Audit Act.
No significant steps have been taken on tariff reform. A uniform flat
consumptive rate applies throughout the Territory.
t -· er.. t ·..oft a: ·CD-·-
= '""' CD
[28]
E~loyment/work
pract ices
Rate of return targets and
acCOUlting practices
New South IJales
'oeca i led
information i s not readily ava i lable, however, some considerat ion has been given to contracting out.
There are no rate of return targets set for the water sector in NSIJ . Accrual account ing procedures are used in the preparation of financial statements.
Victor ia
Staff employed by
the MMBIJ have declined by 12 per cent since 1983·84.
In 1987-88 the n~tropolitan sub· sector ach ieved a real rate of return of 4.S per cent wh ich is in excess of the goverm~Cnt•s
target of 4 per cent. financial statements are prepared using both historical and current replacement cos t approaches .
Queensland
Little information
ava i lable regarding employees and work practices.
No rate of return targets are set for the water industry but the Cornni ss ion is exoected to recover the full cost of service except where government subsidies apply.
IJestern Aus tralia
Latest informat ion
on employment suggests only n~rginal reductions in staff in recent years.
No rate of return targets are set for the water industry. However, 3 per cent of gross revenue from the preceding financial year is required to be paid to the State Government and costs are to be recovered where possible. Accrual accounting procedures are used in preparing f inancial statements.
South Australia
Employment in the
Department decl ined by 4.9 per cent during 1988-89. To improve work practices the Department has initiated a program to develop management and an employee performance management system.
The Department in i tiated rate of return targets in July 1988. All f ir.anci al statements are prepared based on accrual accounting procedures in line with the private sector.
TasmJn ia
Little information
available.
No rate of return targets are set for the Tasmanian water industry . Accrual aCCOUlting procedures are used in the preparation
of f inancial statements .
Nor thern Terr i tory
PAIJA en~loyment
increased by 2.3 per cent in the 12 months to JU'Ie 1989.
There are no rate of return targets. All financial statements encompass accrual accounting procedures in
accordance with standards set down by Australi an
accounting bodies.
~
~ IV a c:c
fl; "'! -· •. .. .• Ci -·-e --f' c
[29]
Other measures to
enhance performance
New South llalcs
·The introduction of
business units is be ing encouraged as a means of inproving performance.
Victor ia
The KHBY in~roduced
a business planning system in 1987 to encourage forward planning on a long-term basis. It is hoped its introduction will promote efficiency and effectiveness in the delivery of water services and increase the Board's level of autonomy.
Queens land
The introduction of
business units is being encouraged as a means of emancing performance.
-Uestcrn Australia
The introduction of
business units is being encouraged.
South Australia
An economic model
has been developed with the primary objective of providing information for the Department's strategic and business planning processes.
Tasman ia
The introduction of
business units is being encouraged.
Northern Jerritory
A strateg ic management directorate has been establ ished to inprove long·term planning and allow • the rest of the organisation to concentrate on the running of existing day to day operations.
-c ct --,.. a
[30]
~TfR AUTHORITIES - NON · URaAN
Corporate structure/ ministerial oversight
\later pricing reforms
n 0 :J
E~loyment/work
practices
t'"""\ c c:r -· ::s CD ....
I -= I
t'"""\ 0 = ....... -· Q., CD = ""' CD
New South Uales
The Department of \later Resources oversights the water bodies in eight regions of the State and is accountable to Part iament.
Comnercial pricing was introduced in 1988·89 based on 'user pays' principles. All operating expenses, debt charges etc are to be met by u_sers and all cross subsidies are to be
eliminated.
Some recent discussions on contract labour to replace salaried staff and handing responsibility of riv~r management back to the irrigators.
Victoria
The Rural \later Comnission is responsible for rural water agencies in the State.
A heavy reliance on general rates based on property values • A two part tariff involving a fixed charge plus a volumetric charge may, however, soon be introduced.
The Rural \later Comnission has reduced its staff levels by 32 per cent since 1983-84.
Queensland
The Minister for Primary Industries has the responsibility for overseeing the activities of the Queensland \later Resources Coamission.
Significant att~ts are being made to raise the contribution to capital costs, particularly for new schemes.
Some attention ~as been given to award restructuring and IWlti·skilling.
Ucstern Australia
The Minister for \later Resources is responsible for the activities of the \later Authority of Uestern Australia (UA\JA).
No significant steps have been taken in tariff
reform but UA\JA will not receive any subsidies during the 1990-91 financial year.
Some attention has been given to award restructuring and multi-skill ing.
South AustralIa
The Minister for \later Resources is charged with the responsibility for overseeing the activities of the Engineering and \later Supply Department.
The department is moving towards a two part tariff.
Some attention has been given to award restructuring and multi-skill i ng.
Tasmania
The Minister for Resources and Energy is responsible for the activities of the Rivers and \later Supply Coamission.
No information ava i lable.
Some attention has been given to award restructuring and
multi·skilling.
Northern Territory
The Minister for Minerals and Energy has the responsibility for oversighting the activities of the Power and \later Authority.
A uniform flat consumptive rate applies throughout
the Territory.
Some attention has been given to award restructuring and
multi·skilling.
[31]
l ;
I I I I 1
Rate of return
targets and 8CCOlXl t i ng practices
Other measures to enhance performance
Nell South IJ<~Ies
There are no rate
of return targets set for the water sector in NSIJ but regional bodies are expected to optimise financial management to cater for infrastructure maintenance, refurbishment and replacement. Accrual accounting procedures are used in the preparation of financial statements.
Two consultancy studies prepared tor the Hinist<'!r rec0111nend changes to work pract ices and greater use of contract labour.
Victor ia
The Conmi s!ii on is
required to earn a zero real rate of return on the wr i tt en do~~n current replaccn~nt cost of assets for existing farm services. And to earn a 4 per cent real rate of return on the written down current replacement cost of assets for new investments and services. Financial statements are prepared and based on accrual aCCOlXlting procedures in I ine with the private sector.
In add i tion to the business planning system, the Rural Yater Comnission has introduced a t i nanc ial nklnage1nent strategy.
Queensland
No rat~ of return
targets set for the industry but the Conmission is expected to recover the full cost of service except where goverrment subsidies apply. Accrual accounting procedures are used in the preparation of financial statements.
The introduction of business un its is being encouraged by the Austral ian IJater Resources Council to enhance performance.
llestern Australia
No rate of return
targets set tor the industry. Accrual account ing procedures are used in the preparation of financial statements.
The introduction of business units is being encouraged by the Austral ian llatcr Resources Council to enhance performance.
South Australia
Haves are afoot to
set rate of return targets for the industry. Accrual accounting procedures are used in the preparation of financial statements.
The introduction of business units is being encouraged by the Austral ian llater Resources Counc i I to enhance performance.
Tasman ia
No rate of return
targets set for the industry. Accrual accounting procedures are used in the preparation of financial statements.
The introduction of business units is being encouraged by the Austral ian llater Resources Council to enhance performance.
Northern Terr i tory
No rate of return
targets set for the
industry. Accrual accounting
procedures are ~s~ in the preparation of financial statements.
The introduction of business units is being encouraged by the Australian llater Resources Counci I to enhance performance .
[32]
Cabinet -In-Confidence 32
ATTACHMENT C
LABOUR MANAGEMENT ISSUES
An essential element in microeconomic reform is the implementation of processes to improve productivity and efficiency in the workplace. The active participation of State Governments in this area of microeconomic reform is vital given their role as employers and the prevalence of State awards.
The key industrial relations issues to be addressed include:
rationalisation of award and union coverage to simplify the bargaining process and consolidate the plethora of awards in State based industries;
greater complementarity between Federal and State industrial tribunals;
development of more efficient management and work practices, developments of training programs and improved careers structures as part of award restructuring and an increased emphasis on participative work practices and occupational health and safety;
processes to adjust employment levels to the requirement of the organisation and payment of ?PPropriate benefits to displaced employees.
The resolution of these key industrial relations issues will be facilitated by the cooperation of the trade union movement. Unions have demonstrated a willingness to cooperate in reform processes where they are effectively involved in the planning and implementation of labour restructuring programs and where the benefits of reform are clear to the union memebership in terms of skill enhancement, increased investment in training and retraining programs and improved career prospects in more satisfying and diverse jobs.
The Commonwealth is taking action to support labour market reform both generally and in specific key industries. This has been undertaken through wages policy, providing the right institutional framework through legislative changes to facilitate programs for employers and unions undertaking approved projects. State Governments might be encouraged by. the Commonwealth to similarly assist labour market reform processes in defined areas of microeconomic reform. These issues can be advanced at the Conference of Commonwealth and State Labour Ministers and the Departments of Labour Advisory Committee.
\.G b1net -In-Confidence
[33]
labinet -In-Confidence 33
A'ITACHMENT D
LEGISLATIVE POWERS OF THE COMMONWEALTH TO PROMOTE MICRO-ECONOMIC REFORM IN THE STATES AND TERRITORIES
This paper focuses primarily on the Commonwealth's non-fiscal legislative powers.
CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS
2. The Commonwealth does not possess plenary power over the economy (including micro-economic reform). However, it possesses a number of powers that would enable it to encourage or impose (either directly or indirectly) micro-economic reform in certain areas otherwise within State control. The formulation of practical and politically acceptable policies utilising these powers is, of course, another matter.
Terr i tories power ( s . l22)
3. This power would enable the Commonwealth to impose micro-economic reform in relation to any activity:
carried on in a Territory (whether or not carried on by a Territory Government or a Territory body of any kind); or
constituting trade between a Territory and a State or another Territory.
Powe r ove r int e r state and ove r s eas t rade (s.5 l ( i ))
4. Subject to the constitutional prohibitions and guarantees referred to in para.9 below, this power could be used, for example:
to regulate the activities of State GBE's that constitute interstate or overseas trade, for example:
imports or exports by State GBE's could be prohibited outright or subject to a wide range of conditions;
the terms and conditions of transportation of goods in the course of overseas trade could be regulated (eg transportation of coal from mine to loading at a port);
to regulate the terms and conditions of employment of persons employed in interstate and overseas trade (eg on the waterfront); and
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[34]
lUDiner -1n-lonr1oence 34
ATTACHMENT D
to take other measures that directly promote (including by removing impediments to) interstate or overseas trade, for example, measures designed to improve the efficiency of the energy and transport industries for the purposes of interstate and overseas trade.
Power over trading and financial corporations and foreign corporations Cs.Sl{xx))
5. Subject to the constitutional prohibitions and guarantees referred to in para. 9 above, this power could be used:
to regulate the conduct by State GBE's which are constitutional corporations of their trading or financial activities~
to give non-fiscal assistance, subject to a wide range of possible conditions, to State GBE's which are constitutional corporations;
possibly, to prevent certain activities taking place unless they were carried on by constitutional corporations.
6. It is arguable that the power could also be used to force State GBE's to change aspects of their organisation and management. However, the constitutional status of laws relating to internal management of trading or financial corporations may be open to some doubt.
Conciliation and arbitration power <s.51 Cxxxv))
7. This power could be used to require the Industrial Relations Commission to take into account specific Commonwealth policies in relation to micro-economic reform. There may be scope for the use of the power to influence more directly the content of awards for micro-economic purposes.
Other non-fiscal powers
8. There are other available non-fiscal powers (eg, the posts and telegraphs power (s.Sl(v)) that are for various reasons likely to be of marginal usefulness for the purpose of influencing micro-economic reform. ·
9. The exercise of the Commonwealth's constitutional powers is generally subject to:
s.92 of the Constitution, which guarantees the freedom of interstate trade (measures could not discriminate against interstate trade if such discrimination also had a protectionist purpose);
s.99 of the Constitution, which prevents the giving of a preference to a State or a part of a State; and
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[35]
Cabinet -In-Confidence 35
ATTACHMENT D
implied constitutional immunities which prevent measures that discriminate against a State or tend to undermine its existence.
EXISTING LEGISLATION (INCLUDING POSSIBLE EXTENSIONS)
Prices Surveillance Act 1983 and the Trade Practices Act 1974
10. The Prices Surveillance Act and the Trade Practices Act do not bind a State or a State body (including a GBE) that shares the immunities of the State (ie in practical terms, is subject to a high degree of direction by the State).
11. The constitutional powers discussed above (particularly the trade and corporations powers) could be used, subject to relevant constitutional prohibitions and guarantees, to extend the application of those Acts to the States and State GBEs.
12. If the Trade Practices Act were to apply to the States and State bodies, advantages could flow in such areas as:
its application to any agreements between State marketing bodies which involve anit-competitive practices;
preventing State trading authorities from engaging in false and misleading conduct; and
application of the provisions relating to such matters as price discrimination, exclusive dealing and the misuse of market power.
13. In relation to the extension of the Trade Practices Act, the States have strongly resisted any application of the Trade Practices Act to their activities and will no doubt continue to take that view.
Corporation legislation
14. The scope for reform in corporate regulation has been extremely limited because of the operation of the present co-operative arrangements between the Commonwealth and the States. If the Commonwealth acquires the real legislative capacity to put policy in place (as distinct from an ability to legislate only in relation to those matters agreed to by · the States) it would be open to the Commonwealth to encourage or enforce the observance by State public sector instrumentalities of laws applicable to private sector commercial bodies in areas such as:
the purchase by public sector commercial entities of securities in the market place; and
primary fund-raising and subsequent trading of securities by public sector organisations.
ATTORNEY-GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT 13 June 1990 (a binet -In-Confidence
[36]
~ Q c:r -· = CD ....
I -= I
~ 0 = ...... -· c.. CD = """ CD
ORGANISATION
Standing Committee on Transport (SCOT)
Australian Transport Advisory Council (ATAC)
Commonwealth/States Committee on Communications
Australian Industry and Technology Council (AITC)
Australian Education Council
Commonwealth-State Tra ining Advisory Committee
Department of Labour Advisory Committee (DOLAC)
DEPT
DTC
DTC
DTC
DITAC
DEET
DEET/DIR
COMMENTS
Senior State and Federal officials group (Departmental Secretaries) Policy advising group to ATAC (see below) A number of State/Federal officials groups report to SCOT, including groups dealing with Road Safety, Marine and Ports, Roads, Railways
State and Commonwealth Transport Ministers Meets annually, or more frequently as required Meeting 25 May discussed national road safety package, heavy vehicle and bus safety and waterfront reform with specific reference to port authorities. A special ATAC meeting is to convened in September to discuss major policy reform reports road cost recovery, options for a national inter-system rail freight organisation and options for the future of rail transport. Normally issues a communique at the end of each meeting
State and Federal officials, together with representatives of communications GBE's Meets twice a year
State and Federal industry Ministers Supported by a Standing Committee of senior officials Consults on industry and technology policy
State and Federal Education Ministers
Senior State and Federal officials
State and Federal Secretaries of Departments Sets agenda for Conference of Labour Ministers (see below) Jointly chaired by DEET and DIR
r be c
c on w -0\ = CD ..... I -= I r
0 = ..... -Q CD = """ CD
[37]
,..... Cl c:r -· ::::::1 CD _.,.
I -::s I
r'"\ 0 :::s _..., -· Q.. CD :::s ~ CD
ORGANISATION
Conference of Commonwealth and State Labour Ministers
Australian Minerals and Energy Council
Standing Committee of Consumer Affairs Ministers
Australian Health Minister's Conference
Australian Health Minister's Advisory Council
Standing Committee of Commonwealth-State Women's Advisers
DEPT
DEET/DIR
DPIE
FBCA
DCSH
DCSH
PM&C
COMMENTS
State and Federal Ministers for labour market policy Meets twice a year Meeting 25 May discussed the means of promoting industrial relations issues involved in the States' pursuit of microeconomic reform.
State and Federal Ministers A number of specialist working groups report to the Council
State and Federal Ministers for Consumer Affairs Annual meetings Next meeting 20 July 1990 in Perth Officials meet one week earlier to formulate resolutions for Ministers to discuss
State and Federal Health Ministers Annual meeting Next meeting 9 July 1990 in Brisbane
Senior State and Federal officials group (Department Secretaries) Meet twice yearly Next meeting 1 June in Melbourne
meets quarterly
[38]
Cabinet -In-Confidence 38
INDUSTRY COMMISSION FORWARD WORK PROGRAM
Curre nt Inquiries
Aids and appliances for people with disabilities
Product liability
ATTACHMENT F
Fina l Report Due
18 July 1990
18 July 1990
Passenger Motor Vehicles 31 December 1990
Mining and minerals process i ng
Recycling of products
Commercial tariff concession and by-law systems
Statutory marketing arrangements
Construction costs of major projects
Energy generation and distribution
Rail transport
Future Inquiries
28 February 1991
28 February 1991
8 March 1991
19 March 1991
18 April 1991
19 May 1991
19 August 1991
The Government has also decided on an indicative timetable for the remaining inquiries in the Industry Commission's current two year work program, as follows:
References commencing in 1990
Exports of health services
Exports of education services
Dairying·
Raw material pricing for domestic use
Export franchising and distribution arrangements
References commenc i ng i n 1 991
Sugar
Availability of capital
Implications for Australia of firms locating offshore
Cabinet -In-Confidence
[39]