Date post: | 07-Jul-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | rohan-pankar |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 50
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
1/50
NEED FOR
COMPETITION ACT
IN GLOBAL ERA
PGP (O6-O8)/FW
SECTION – A-2
PRESENTED BY
RICHA AWASTHI -42 ROHIT SHRIDHAR - 44
SAURABH LODARIA - 46 SHANKAR PARMESWARAN - 48
SHILPA LULLA -! SHRUTI KORLIMARLA -2
"IKRAM M -4 "ARUN BA#A# -6
1
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
2/50
MUNIRA #ARWALA -8 HITESH PATEL -6!
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This is with great pleasure that we take this
opportunity to work on our project of NEED FOR
COMPETITION ACT IN GLOBAL ERA, which has
not only allowed us to know the basic
fundamentals but has also laid down for us a
platform to understand the application end of the
subject(topic). Also, we would like to thank our
mentor Prof. Anant Amdekar who has been our
inspiration throughout for his support and regular
guidance which has also beneted us to hae a
thorough understanding of law and its implications.
2
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
3/50
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SR$ NO$ PARTICULARS PAGE NO$
1. Prefatory Items 1-3
1.1 Topic and team members 11.2 Acknowledgement 2
1.3 Table of Contents 3
2. Introduction
3. !"TP ACT #
. $eed for Competition Act 1%
&. 'imitation of !"TP Act 12
(. Competition act ) *.+ conte,t 1&
#. Competition act ) +out Africa conte,t 2%
. /b0ecties of Competition Act 21
. Composition of Commission 3%
1%. Amendments 33
11. Adantages of Competition Act 3
12. +ortcomings of Competition Act 3&
13. Case +tudy ) 4T +A5A"A 3(
1. Case +tudy ) '6T 7"A+I! 3#
1&. Case +tudy ) $4T+CAP4 6!IC"/+/8T
%
1(. Comparison 1
1#. Critical Comments 21. Conclusion &
1. 9ibliograpy
3
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
4/50
GLOBAL COMPETITION AND COMPETITION ACT
4conomic reforms in India were supposed to user in a market-oriented economy in contrast to
te regime of licenses and controls tat caracteri:ed te economy in te past. Te fulcrum of amarket economy is competition. 5oweer; te ability of competition and te market economy to
enance consumer welfare and to allocate resources optimally inges on te proper functioning
of markets. 9ot in teory and practice te ill effects of improperly functioning markets ae
been igligted.
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
5/50
new trade enironment sweeping te globe. Te business sectors of most industriali:ed countries
ae tus internationali:ed teir actiities; resulting in an intricate web of linked actiities
around te world.
Today@s knowledge-based economy; altoug still in its infancy; is proing to be fast-paced and
spurred by product; tecnology and organi:ational innoation. Anecdotal eidence is all around
us> product lifecycles are becoming sorter and sorter all te time new; largely computer-
assisted tecnologies resulting from te digital microprocessing reolution are proliferating in all
aspects of business from te factory giants to te local corner store and lean production
tecniBues; wic promote speciali:ation in core competency actiities wile outsourcing from
strategic allies; are reorgani:ing te marketplace.
Te goernment policy responses to tese deelopments; in te form of trade liberali:ation
efforts and te deregulation and priati:ation of utilities; ae made te Canadian economy more
competitie.
For example, the Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement (FTA) has played a significant
role in raising the productivity and competitiveness of the Canadian manufacturing sector over
the past decade y forcing industry to rationali!e plants and operations and to exploit economies
of scale further" #nnovations in telecommunications and energy technologies and systems haveeliminated any general notion of $natural monopoly,$ and resulted in deregulation and open
competition %here once only government or regulated private monopolies dominated the
commercial landscape"
Tese new business models e,ert new pressures on te business sector and are beginning to
reeal new stresses and fracture points in te competition policy framework. 8or instance;
greater cross-border trade may also mean more international anticompetitie conduct. As a result;
competition autorities must respond by furter cooperating wit one anoter.
A knowledge-based; innoation-drien economy is a dynamic economy; one tat is caracteri:ed
by numerous new products; tecnologies and production processes; and een new industries.
9arriers to entry into te more mature industries can be knocked down and competition can
sometimes flouris were it as neer been seen before. !arket dominance also appears to be
&
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
6/50
more sort-lied tan in any preious time. 5oweer; across all industries tecnological cange
is apparently driing down te costs of production wit te result tat te typical firm@s cost
structure more freBuently e,ibits substantial increasing returns to scale. Allegations of predatory
beaiour are likely to mount in tis new economic enironment and te related proisions of
te Competition Act will come under increased pressure and scrutiny.
Innoatie products will often be accompanied by an intellectual property rigt and tere is an
interface tere tat must be looked at more closely>
Te policy and enforcement interfaces between intellectual property and competition policies are
comple, oweer; clear borderlines must be drawn between competitie and anticompetitie
conduct. Tese economic deelopments also pose new callenges to te competition autority.
C&*..&' 0'1 C&*..&' P&,% I'.*3,0
Te interplay between competition; on te one and; and competition policy and law; on te
oter and; is interesting. itnesses made it clear from te outset tat> ?Competition is a means
to an end. Te reason we ae competition is to delier te best products at te best prices for te
people wo buy tem. As a result; ?te best protection for consumers is a free and open market;
wit as few barriers to new competitors coming in as possible; weter tey@re regulatory;
ownersip; trade; wateer types of barriers?. 5oweer; unfettered competition alone is not
enoug. A complementary competition policy is reBuired in circumstances were; owing to
tecnological or regulatory barriers; competition will not automatically and immediately flouris.
ile competition and competition policy are complementary; tey are not perfect substitutes
wen regulatory barriers interene.
5oweer; competition policy can be at best partially correctie. In tis case; ?competition law
alone is not sufficient to ensure te itality of te competitie process. D /ccasionally
competition law can offset some of te negatie effects of tese types of restrictions. !ore
freBuently; oweer; it cannot. Indeed; trying to twist competition law so as to accommodate an
anticompetitie regulatory enironment is likely to compromise and een corrupt competition
law. 9ad regulation begets bad competition law.
(
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
7/50
MONOPOLOSTIC AND RESTRICTI"E TRADE PRACTICE (MRTP)
Te !onopolies and "estrictie Practices Act; 1(; wic; loosely speaking; was te first
competition law of te country. Te !"TP Act represents an era of aggressie goernment
interentionist policy reflected unambiguously in controls; licensing; permits and promotion of
public sector. Te dawn of liberali:ation in 11; following a financial crisis; rendered some
laws inconsistent wit new economic policies. /ne of tem was !"TP Act.
!"TP Act; wic came into force on 1 une 1#%; was te first substantie legislation aimed at
regulating free and unfettered trade. Te main ob0ectie of enacting te !"TP Act was to ensure
tat te economic system does not result in te concentration of economic power to te common
detriment; for te control of monopolies and for te proibition of monopolistic and restrictie
trade practices.
Te !"TP Act regulated tree types of trade practices; wic amper competition in India or are
pre0udicial to public interest; namely
1E !onopolistic trade practices
2E "estrictie trade practices
3E *nfair trade practices
1E Monopolistic Trade Practices (MTPs)
!TP is defined under section 2FiE of !"TP Act as a trade practice wic as or is likely toae te effect of>
#
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
8/50
!aintaining te prices of goods or carges for te serices at an unreasonable leel by
limiting; reducing or oterwise controlling te production; supply or distribution of goods
or te supply of any serices or in any oter manner
*nreasonably preenting or lessening competition in te production; supply or
distribution of any goods or in te supply of any serices
'imiting tecnical deelopment or capital inestment to te common detriment or
allowing te Buality of any goods produced; supplied or distributed; or any serices
rendered; in India to deteriorate
Increasing unreasonably>
- te cost of production of any goods or
- carges for te proision; or maintenance of any serices
Increasing unreasonably>
- te prices at wic goods are; or may be; sold or re-sold; or te carges at wic te
serices are; or may be; proided or
- te profits wic are; or may be; deried by te production; supply or
distributionFincluding te sale or purcaseE of any goods or in te proision or maintenance of
any goods or by te proision of any serices>
Preenting or lessening competition in te production; supply or distribution of any
goods or in te proision or maintenance of any serices by te adoption of unfair
metods or unfair or deceptie practices.
4,ample for !TPs>
In te *+ !icrosoft was using its monopoly in operating system to secure monopoly in te
internet e,plorer market. !icrosoft is supplying its internet browser wit indows . Tis
destroyed te market of $etscape 9rowser. An Antitrust case was launced against !icrosoft
wic it lost and te court as ordered diision of te company in one dealing in operating
systems and te oter in applications.
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
9/50
2E Restrictive Trade Practices (RTPs)
A restrictie trade practice is generally one wic as te effect of preenting; distorting or
restricting competition. In particular; a practice wic tends to obstruct te flow of capital or
resources into te stream of production is an "TP. 'ikewise; manipulation of prices; conditions
of deliery or flow of supply in te market wic may ae te effect of imposing on te
consumer un0ustified costs or restrictions are regarded as restrictie trade practices. 9ut
competition is not always a necessary toucstone on wic a trade practice is 0udged if it is a
"TP. Certain common types of restrictie trade practices enumerated in te Act wic do not
ae an element of competition and are deemed legally to be pre0udicial to public interest.
4,amples of "TP are>
aE
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
10/50
NEED OF COMPETITION ACT IN INDIA
Te globali:ed and liberali:ed Indian economy is witnessing cut-troat competition. To
proide institutional support to ealty and fair competition; tere is a reBuirement of
better regulatory and ad0udicatory mecanism. To tis effect; India as enacted te new
competition law wic sall replace te earlier law. Tis is a sift from curbing monopolies to
encouraging competition. Te design of te new law cares out a ery important role for
te Competition Commission of India FCCIE. Te task as been diided in tree pases. Tis
article sets out to e,plain te intricate relationsip of competition law and 0udiciary in India by
e,amining te e,perience CCI ad so far. Te article ten goes on to e,amine te role of
lawyers. Te article ten considers te time frame for te implementation of te tree
pases and proides realistic suggestions to ae a successful setting of competition regimein India.
I'.3&1%.&'
In te pursuit of globali:ation; India as responded by opening up its economy; remoing
controls and resorting to liberali:ation. Te natural corollary of tis is tat te Indian
market sould be geared to face competition from witin te country; and outside. To
take care of te needs of te trading; industry and business associations; te Central
7oernment decided to enact a law on competition. 8inance !inister; Cidambaram
F2%%3E igligted te need to ae a strong legal system and said HA world class legal
system is absolutely essential to support an economy tat aims to be world class. India needs to
take a ard look at its commercial laws and te system of dispensing 0ustice in commercial
matters. it tis :eal te 7oernment went aead and enacted te Competition Act; 2%%2.
1%
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
11/50
T5* E03,*3 ,0 0'1 .5* '**1 7&3 %50'*
It would be interesting to turn te pages of istory and see ow te earlier law; wic is
still in force; was enacted. In 1(; wen te Indian democracy was in its nascent stage J
barely 1# years old J te 7oernment of India appointed te !onopolies InBuiry Commission
to inBuire into te e,tent and effect of concentration of economic power in priate ands
and te prealence of monopolistic and restrictie trade practices in important sectors of
economic actiity oter tan agriculture. Te Commission submitted its report alongwit
Te !onopolies and "estrictie Trade Practices 9ill; 1(&; wic was later passed by bot
te 5ouses of Parliament and receied te assent of te President on
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
12/50
An Act to proide; keeping in iew of te economic deelopment of te country; for te
establisment of a Commission to preent practices aing aderse effect on competition; to
promote and sustain competition in markets; to protect te interests of consumers and to ensure
freedom of trade carried on by oter participants in markets; in India; and for matters connected
terewit or incidental tereto. It e,tends to te wole of India e,cept te +tate of ammu and
=asmir
THE FRAMEWORK OF THE COMPETITION BILL IN INDIA:
Te preamble of te Competition bill states tat it is a law to foster and maintain competition in
te Indian !arket to sere consumer interest wile protecting te freedom of economic action of
arious market participants and to preent practices wic affect competition; and to establis a
commission terefore.
Tis law replaces te age-old !"TP act. Te !"TP act ad two parts; one; te restriction of
monopoly; and te oter te curtailing of restrictie trade practices. ile te restriction of
monopoly implied tat no firm could e,pand beyond a certain limit of inestments; and artificial
efforts at raising prices or restricting supply in a market in suc a way so as to get a price aboe
te one tat market would be prepared to pay under normal circumstances.
Tus te empasis of competition bill is more on consumer freedom and freedom of economic
actiities rater tan control and elimination of monopolies te different capters deal wit te
lengt and breadt of tis law.
L.0.&' &7 MRTP A%.- ;
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
13/50
In 1%; te goernment; wit an Industrial Policy statement gae many concessions to
companies falling under !"TP Act- an important concession was raising limit for !"TP
companies from "s 2% crore to "s 1%% crore at one stroke
In :
Te policy of te goernment rigt since Independence; as been to pursue industrial growt
witout concentration of industries in te ands of a few. 5oweer; te legislation to control
concentration of industries was enacted in 1(; nearly 2% years after launcing planned
economic deelopment. itin 3- years; te entusiasm of goernment diluted as can be seen
from te rela,ations granted for e,pansion and growt of large companiesGbusiness ouses on a
ariety of grounds suc as priority industries; location in backward areas; e,ports etc. In te
1#%s especially; goernment as seen te conflict between ob0ecties of rapid growt and
preention of concentration of economic power in priate ands; and goernment as openly
gien priority to growt ob0ectie.
) F0,*1 .& %&+*3 0,, A*%.:
it liberali:ation; came T/ agreements; relation to 8oreign Inestment; Intellectual Property
"igts; subsidies; anti-dumping measures. !"TP Act does not coer tese aspects. 5ence tere
was a need of a new law coering all tese aspects.
4) L0% &7 A03*'* 0?&. .5* A%.:
13
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
14/50
Te Proisions relating to unfair trade practices are coered by consumer protection Act; 1(;
wic is igly publici:ed. 5ence people in general; are more aware of it tan te !"TP
commission wic is situated only in $ew
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
15/50
country; eiter troug direct sales or by way of e,ports. Te estimated cost imposed by te
cartel; on India; was about *+M2&mn; oer te 1%s. To find out more about tis; C*T+
decided to start a case. As a first step in tis direction; all te releant information on te cases;
accumulated by seeral autorities around te world; was collected from te internet and ten
documented. Tis information included details of te company; details of te inestigation; te
0udgement and te balance seets of some of tese companies during te releant period. 'etters
were written to te C4/s of tese companies in India asking tem to gie a written undertaking
to te effect tat tey did not engage in any suc anti competitie practice in India. "esponses
were receied from 5offman 'a "oce and 9A+8 India 'td.;stating tat tey ae not engaged
in suc practices but no response came from "one Poulenc 'td; wic incidentally; was te
approer in te *+ inestigation and ad escaped punisment. 9eing a consumer organisation;
C*T+ ad limited ability and ence it passed te collected information to te
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
16/50
In *+ competition law is e,pressed in te form of antitrust law. Te istoric goal of te antitrust
laws in te *.+ is to protect economic freedom and opportunity by promoting competition in te
marketplace. Competition in a free market benefits American consumers troug lower prices;
better Buality and greater coice. Competition proides businesses te opportunity to compete on
price and Buality; in an open market and on a leel playing field; unampered by anticompetitie
restraints. Competition also tests and ardens American companies at ome; te better to succeed
abroad.
ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AND THE CONSUMER IN THE U$S
Te first set of competition FantitrustE laws were enacted among te western industriali:ed
countries towards te end of te last century. Te pioneers were Canada F1E and te *nited
+tates F1%E. It is interesting to obsere tat a undred years later; seeral deeloping and
transition market economies are embracing competition laws. +ince 1% alone; at least 3% suc
countries ae adopted new laws; or ae substantially reised teir e,isting laws. Tese include
irtually all of te former communist-centrally planned economies in Central and 4astern
4urope; and te 8ormer +oiet *nion. +eeral oter countries are in te process of following
suit.
Antitrust laws protect competition. 8ree and open competition benefits consumers by ensuring
lower prices and new and better products. In a freely competitie market; eac competing
business generally will try to attract consumers by cutting its prices and increasing te Buality of
its products or serices. Competition and te profit opportunities it brings also stimulate
businesses to find new; innoatie and more efficient metods of production.
Consumer@s benefit from competition troug lower prices and better products and serices.
Companies tat fail to understand or react to consumer needs may soon find temseles losing
out in te competitie battle.
en competitors agree to fi, prices; rig bids or allocate Fdiide upE customers; consumers lose
te benefits of competition. Te prices tat result wen competitors agree in tese ways are
1(
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
17/50
artificially ig suc prices do not accurately reflect cost and terefore distort te allocation of
societyNs resources. Te result is a loss not only to *.+. consumers and ta,payers; but also to te
*.+. economy.
en te competitie system is operating effectiely; tere is no need for goernment intrusion.
Te law recogni:es tat certain arrangements between firms -- suc as competitors cooperating
to perform 0oint researc and deelopment pro0ects -- may benefit consumers by allowing te
firms tat ae reaced te agreement to compete more effectiely against oter firms. Te law
does not condemn all agreements between companies; only tose tat treaten to raise prices to
consumers or to deprie tem of new and better products.
Tus; according to te Antitrust law wen competing firms get togeter to fi, prices; to rig bids;
to diide business between temseles or to make oter anticompetitie arrangements tat
proide no benefits to consumers; te goernment will act promptly to protect te interests of
American consumers.
Te *.+ goernment takes a number of actions to promote a competitie enironment>
;$B3*0' &'&&,*> "elying on te +erman Act; te goernment may sue to break up a
corporation tat as attained a monopoly or near monopoly in an industry. In 111; te
goernment broke up +tandard /il of $ew ersey Fwic controlled oer % percent of te
refining and sales of petroleum productsE into 3% independent corporations. In 12; AT 6 T;
after being sued by te goernment agreed to be broken into 23 independent local telepone
companies. Tese operating companies became seen regional pone companies offering local
telepone serice. Te long-distance serice; estern 4lectric and 9ell 'aboratories were
retained in te corporation tat kept te name AT 6 T. /ter suits by te goernment ae been
less successful. Te courts refused to breakup *.+. +teel in 12%. Te goernment also was
unsuccessful in breaking up I9! in 12.
2$ P3*+*'.' &'&&,* 73& 03'> Te goernment seeks to keep corporations wit
economic power from engaging in practices tat are designed to minimi:e or eliminate
competition. +uc practices include bundling and tying arrangements; price discrimination; and
price fi,ing. In te 1%s; a number of legal suits against suc practices ae been brougt
1#
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
18/50
oweer; winning suc cases in court is difficult. $intendo of America; te dominant ideo-game
maker; successfully defended an antitrust action brougt by Atari Corporation. !icrosoft agreed
to sare information about its indows operating system wit software deelopers and to stop
reBuiring PC manufacturers to pay license fees for indows on all units sipped Fweter or not
indows was installedE. Te 1 suits brougt by te ustice
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
19/50
into it Fmaker of Ouicken financial softwareE; on te basis of economic eidence tat reduced
competition would result.
4$P3*+*'.' %&,,&'> 8irms need not be monopolies to e,ercise monopoly power. 8irms can
form cartels and collaborate to reduce output and increase price. +uc cartels ae te same
effect on social welfare as do monopolies; and suc beaior is illegal. Price fi,ing Fin wic
corporations 0ointly decide wat price to setE also is illegal. In 12#; te court found tat te
maker of toilets as acted illegally wen tey met to fi, prices and limit Buantities. !ore difficult
is te problem of price fi,ing wen tere is no e,plicit agreement to do so. 4en absent an
agreement; te court may find ?conscious parallelism;? tat is; a situation in wic all producers
act in te same way at te same time wile being aware tat oter producers are doing likewise.
In te 1%s; te goernment successfully callenged te practice of Iy 'eague uniersities
meeting and e,canging information on planned tuition increases; faculty salaries; and financial
aid polices. In 1(; te giant agribusiness firm Arcer
was born in opposition to te great wae of mergers and consolidations at te close of te
nineteent century. Te original pilosopy of te trustbusters was tat market dominance and
monopoly was bad in and of temseles. *ntil te 1(%s; te goernment preented te merger
of two 'os Angel@s grocery cains tat sared 0ust percent of te local marketE. 5oweer; by
te 1#%s; and 1%s; te Cicago +cool approac ad assumed dominance in te antitrust
arena. According to tis scool; te forces of free market competition are far more effectie at
1
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
20/50
limiting monopolies tan goernment regulators. Absent proibitie barriers to entry; a firm@s
market power would only be temporary. 5ig profits would attract new entrants attenuating te
monopolist@s power. 8ollowing tis approac; te "eagan and 9us administrations used teir
antitrust powers sparingly
COMPETITION POLICY – SOUTH AFRICAN CONTET
In certain cases; markets are not usually competitie> tey are often dominated by big suppliers
wo use teir seer market power to determine te forms of te market tis as aderse and
detrimental conseBuences on te consumers. !arket can be defined as eiter a product market or
a geograpic market. !arket power can be abused in te product market as well as te
geograpic market. 9ecause of imperfect competition in te market; national goernments
around te world interene in te market economy by drafting and implementing competition
policy. +ome of te reasons and ob0ecties for goernment interentions are>
1. To respond to market failures.
2. To limit abuse of market power
3. To presere and stimulates te operations of competitie market
. In certain situation; to limit foreign participation of foreign capital in order to create and
cultiate domestic industry
Tere are two types of goernment interention. Te first type is beaioral and te second;
structural>
1. .ehavioral intervention is wen te goernment troug a public autority attempts to
transform te beaior of one firm or group of firms troug effectie regulation of teir
actiities. 4,amples of tis are interconnection deals; price regulation or te proibition
of collusie practices.
2. Structural intervention focuses on te market structure of te industry. 4,amples are te
interention to preent a merger of two ma0or telecom companies a network operator
may be reBuired to separate its operations into distinct corporate entities.
2%
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
21/50
Two of te ways to do tis is to set up an economy wide competition regulator andGor create an
industry specific regulator tat implements policies and manages competition in a particular
sector. An economy wide competition autority uses competition law to regulate all sectors in an
economy or country. A sector-specific regulator regulates one sector of te economy. ile some
countries suc as $ew ealand as long ad economy-wide competition law wit no sector
specific regulator; oters like +out Africa as te two structures> a telecommunications
regulator and a competition commission.
OB#ECTI"ES OF THE COMPETITION ACT
/b0ects to be acieed 6 +alient 8eatures of te $ew Competition "egime>
Te Competition Act as been designed as an omnibus code to deal wit matters relating to te
e,istence and regulation of competition and monopolies. Its ob0ects are lofty; and include te
promotion and sustenance of competition in markets;
protection of consumer interests and ensuring freedom of trade of oter participants in te
market; all against te backdrop of te economic deelopment of te country. 5oweer; te
Competition Act is surprisingly; compact; composed of only (( sections. Te legislation is
procedure-intensie; and is structured in an uncomplicated manner. Te raison detre of te
Competition Act is to create an enironment conducie to competition. Te arious /b0ecties of
te Act are as follows
I. To ceck anti-competitie practices
II. To proibit abuse of dominance
III. "egulation of combinations.
IQ. To proide for te establisment of Competition Commission of India FCCIE; a Buasi-0udicial
body to perform below mentioned duties>
21
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
22/50
• Preent practices aing aderse impact on competition
• Promote and sustain competition in te market
•
Protect consumer interests at large
• 4nsure freedom of trade carried on by oter participants in te market
• 'ook into matters connected terewit or incidental tereto.
IR A$TI-C/!P4TITIQ4 A7"44!4$T+ >
A scan of te competition laws in te world will sow tat tey make a distinction between
ori:ontal and ertical agreements between firms. Te former; namely te ori:ontal agreements
are tose among competitors and te latter; namely te ertical agreements are tose relating to
an actual or potential relationsip of purcasing or selling to eac oter. . !ost competition laws
iew ertical agreements generally more leniently tan ori:ontal agreements as ori:ontal
agreements are more likely to reduce competition tan agreements between firms in a purcaser -
seller relationsip. 8or e,ample an agreement made between enterprises dealing in te same
product or products. +uc ori:ontal agreements; lead to unreasonable restrictions of competition
and are terefore presumed to ae an appreciable aderse effect on competition.
Te following diagram elps in understanding te sceme proided under section 3 of te
Competition Act; 2%%2.
+ection 3 of te Act; states tat>
F1E $o enterprise or association of enterprises or person or association of persons sall
enter into any agreement in respect of production; supply; distribution; storage; acBuisition or
control of goods or proision of serices; wic causes or is likely to cause anS appreciable
aderse effect on competition witin India.S
22
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
23/50
F2E Any agreement entered into in contraention of te proisions sall be oid.
F3E Any agreement entered into between enterprises or associations of enterprises or persons of
associations of persons or between any person and enterprise or practice carried on; or decision
taken by; any association of enterprises or association of persons; including cartels; engaged in
Identical or +imilar Trade of goods or proision of serices; wicH
FaE directly or indirectly determines purcase or sale prices
FbE limits or controls production; supply; markets; tecnical deelopment; inestment of
proision of serices
FcE sares te market or source of production or proision of serices by way of allocation
of geograpical area of market; or type of goods or serices; or number of customers in te
market or any oter similar way
dE directly or indirectly results in bid rigging or collusie bidding; sall be presumed to ae
an appreciable aderse effect on competition.
9id "igging or Collusie 9idding>
It is an illegal agreement between two or more competitors. It is a form of price fi,ing and
market allocation and inoles an agreement in wic one party of a group of bidders will be
designated to win te bid.
4.g. 7oernment construction contracts.
C03.*,0.&' 0'1 503' &7 .*33.&3*:
Te aderse effects of cartels or collusie agreements ary in degree depending on te nature of
te companies inoled. It is te ard core cartels tat are te cause of immediate concern for te
goernment. Agreements for saring of markets or sources of productionGsupply by territory;
23
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
24/50
type; si:e of customer or any oter way are also offensie. It includes an association of
producers; distributors; sellers; traders; or serices proiders wo; by agreement amongst
temseles; limit; control or attempt to control te production; distribution; sale of price of; or;
trade in goods or proision of serices.
Proided tat noting contained in tis sub-section sall apply to any agreement entered into by
way of 0oint entures if suc agreement increases efficiency in production; supply; distribution;
storage; acBuisition or control of goods or proision of serices.
4g > Case on
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
25/50
FcE Te Trade and !ercandise !arks Act; 1& F3 of 1&E or te Trade !arks
Act; 1
FdE Te 7eograpical Indications of 7oods F"egistration and ProtectionE Act; 1
FeE Te
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
26/50
if an enterprise.H-
FaE
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
27/50
suc transactions inoling entities e,isting andGor establised oerseas. 5erein again lies te
key to understanding te Competition Act. Te intent of te legislation is not to preent te
e,istence of a monopoly across te board. Tere is a realisation in policy-making circles tat in
certain industries; te nature of teir operations and economies of scale indeed dictate te
creation of a monopoly in order to be able to operate and remain iable and profitable. Tis is in
significant contrast to te pilosopy; wic propelled te operation and application of te
!"TP Act; te trigger for wic was te e,istence or impending creation of a monopoly
situation in a sector of industry
Te Act mandates tat $o person or enterprise sall enter into a combination wic causes or is
likely to cause an appreciable aderse effect on competition witin te releant market in India
and suc a combination sall be oid.. Te Act as made te pre-notification of combinationsoluntary for te parties concerned. 5oweer; if te parties to te combination coose not to
notify te CCI; as it is not mandatory to notify; tey run te risk of a post-combination action by
te CCI; if it is discoered subseBuently; tat te combination as an appreciable aderse effect
on competition. Tere is a rider tat te CCI sall not initiate an inBuiry into a combination after
te e,piry of one year from te date on wic te combination as taken effect. Combination tat
e,ceeds te tresold limits specified in te Act in terms of assets or turnoer; wic causes or is
likely to cause an appreciable aderse impact on competition witin te releant market in India;
can be scrutini:ed by te Commission
AcBuisition; merger or amalgamation would become KCombination@ wen>
$ature of Combination 7roup +tatus Criterion Qalue
FaE AcBuisition by
enterprises
$o 7roup Assets
In India orld
oer
"s. 1;%%% Cr.
*+M&%% million
FbEAcBuisition by
indiiduals
Turn oer In India orld
oer
"s. 3;%%% Cr.
*+M1&%% million
U!ergersG amalgamation 7roup Assets In India orld "s. ;%%% Cr.
2#
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
28/50
/er *+ M 2 9illion
Turn oer In India orld
oer
"s. 12;%%% Cr.
*+M ( 9illion
T53*5&,1 ,. tat would inite te scrutiny are specified below>
8or acBuisition>
• Combined assets of te firm more tan "s 3;%%% crore Ftese limits are *+ M &%% millions
in case one of te firms is situated outside IndiaE.
• Te limits are more tan "s ;%%% crore or 12;%%% crore and *+ M 2 billion and ( billion
in case acBuirer is a group in India or outside India respectiely.
8or mergers>
• Assets of te mergedGamalgamated entity more tan "s 1;%%% crore or turnoer more tan
"s 3;%%% crore Ftese limits are *+ M &%% millions and 1;&%% millions in case one of te
firms is situated outside IndiaE.
• Tese limits are more tan "s ;%%% crore or "s 12;%%% crore and *+ M 2 billions and (
billions in case mergedGamalgamated entity belongs to a group in India or outside India
respectiely.
8urter; suc combination; wic causes or is likely to cause ?appreciable aderse impact? on
competition; would be treated as oid.
A .* is proided under te Act werein at te option of te person or enterprise proposing to
enter into a combination may gie '&.%* .& .5* C&*..&' C&&' &7 I'10 of suc
intention proiding details of te combination. Te Commission after due deliberation; would
gie its opinion on te proposed combination to approac te Commission for tis purpose.
5oweer; public financial institutions; foreign institutional inestors; banks or enture capital
funds wic are contemplating sare subscription financing or acBuisition pursuant to any
2
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
29/50
specific stipulation in a loan agreement or inestor agreement are not reBuired to approac te
CCI for tis purpose.
C&*..&' A1+&%0% :
Peraps one of te most crucial components of te Act is competition adocacy$ Competition
adocacy creates a culture of competition.
Intention is to elp eole competition law troug reiew of policy; promotion of competition
adocacy; creating awareness and imparting training about competition issues. 8or tis purpose
In line wit te 5ig 'eel CommitteeNs recommendation; te Act e,tends te mandate of te
Competition Commission of India beyond merely enforcing te law F5ig 'eel Committee;
2%%%E.
Te "egulatory Autority under te Act; namely; Competition Commission of India FCCIE; is
enabled to participate in te formulation of te countryNs economic policies and to participate in
te reiewing of laws related to competition at te instance of te Central 7oernment. Te
Central 7oernment can make a reference to te CCI for its opinion on te possible effect of a
policy under formulation or of an e,isting law related to competition. Te Commission will
terefore be assuming te role of competition adocate; acting pro-actiely to bring about
7oernment policies tat lower barriers to entry; tat promote deregulation and trade
liberalisation and tat promote competition in te market place.
I" COMPETITION COMMI""ION OF INDIA#
Te ape, body under te Competition Act wic as been ested wit te responsibility of
eliminating practices aing an aderse effect on competition; promoting and sustaining
competition; protecting te interest of te consumers; and ensuring freedom of trade carried on
by oter participants in India; is known as te Competition Commission of India FCCIE --- te
successor to te !"TP Commission. CCI; entrusted wit eliminating proibited practices; is a
body corporate and independent entity possessing a common seal wit te power to enter into
contracts and to sue in its name.Te CCI is not merely a law enforcement agency; but would be
actiely inoled in te formulation of te country@s economic policies; adise te goernment
2
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
30/50
on competition policy; take suitable measures for te promotion of competition adocacy and
create awareness and imparting training about competition issues.
C&&.&' &7 C&&'
• Te Commission sall consist of a Cairperson and not less tan two and not more tan ten
oter !embers to be appointed by te Central 7oernment> Proided tat te Central
7oernment sall appoint te Cairperson and a !ember during te first year of te
establisment of te Commission.
• Te Cairperson and eery oter !ember sall be a person of ability; integrity and standing
and wo; as been; or is Bualified to be; a 0udge of a 5ig Court or; as special knowledge
of; and professional e,perience of not less tan fifteen years in international trade;
economics; business; commerce; law; finance; accountancy; management; industry; public
affairs; administration or in any oter matter wic; in te opinion of te Central
7oernment; may be useful to te Commission.
• Te Cairperson and oter !embers sall be wole-time !embers.
#31%.&'
An enBuiry or complaint could be initiated or filed before te 9enc of CCI if witin te local
limits of its 0urisdiction te respondentVs actually or oluntarily resides; carries on business or
works for personal gain; or were te cause of action wolly or in part arises.
CCI 50 ?**' +*.*1 .5 .5* &*3 &7 0 %+, %&3. '%,1' .5&* 3&+1*1 '1*3
*%.&' 24! 0'1 24!A &7 .5* C&0'* A%.9 ;
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
31/50
oter eBuialent autority will not ae any 0urisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding or
proide in0unction wit regard to any matter wic would ordinarily fall witin te ambit of CCI.
E%,&' 73& #31%.&':
- "easonable "igts under IP"s; etc. protected under Competition Act.
- Agreements e,clusiely for e,ports e,empted
A%. .0' ,0%* &.1* I'10:
CCI as te power to enBuire into unfair agreements or abuse of dominant position or
combinations taking place outside India but aing aderse effect on competition in India; proided tat any of te below mentioned circumstances e,ists>
• An agreement as been e,ecuted outside India
• Any contracting party resides outside India
• Any enterprise abusing dominant position is outside India
• A combination as been establised outside India
• A party to a combination is located abroad.
• Any oter matter or practice or action arising out of suc agreement or dominant position or
combination is outside India.
To deal wit cross border issues; CCI is empowered to enter into any !emorandum of
*nderstanding or arrangement wit any foreign agency of any foreign country wit te prior
approal of Central 7oernment.
P&*3 &7 CCI:
Te CCI will ae te following powers>
To issue ?Cease and
• To grant suc interim relief as would be necessary in eac case.
31
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
32/50
• To award compensation.
• To impose fines on te guilty.
• To order diision of dominant undertaking.
•Power to order de-merger.
• Power to order costs for friolous complaints
In addition to te ad0udication function; te CCI will ae te roles of adocacy; inestigation;
prosecution and merger control.
Te +tatutory "egulatory Autorities can make reference to CCI for adice.
Te proposed 'aw proides for te post of
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
33/50
POST-DECISIONAL OPTIONS:
Te aggrieed person may apply to CCI for 3*+* &7 .5* &31*3 witin tirty days from te date
of te order; proided tat te below mentioned conditions are fulfilled>
• An appeal is allowed by tis Act
• $o appeal as been preferred
Proision as been made for an 0*0, 00'. 0' &31*3 or decision of CCI by any aggrieed
persons. An application for tis purpose as to be made to te +upreme Court witin si,ty days
from te date of communication of te decision or order.
A*'1*'. ' .5* C&*..&' A%. :
In !arc tis year te goernment put forward te Competition FAmendmentE 9ill 2%%(;
wic as been referred to te parliamentary standing committee on finance. Te bill
proposes to amend no less tan 2 of te (1 sections of te Competition Act; replacing 13 and
deleting & sections in teir entirety; and introducing about 21 new sections. Tese canges not
only attempt to address te +upreme Court@s ob0ections; but also modify seeral of te
substantie proisions of te act dealing wit anti-competitie practices.
P3&&0, &7 .5* 0*'1*'.
1. A cange proposed in +ection 12 increases from one year to two years te cooling-
offS period for wic te cairman and members of te CCI are debarred from
accepting employment wit any FpriateE enterprise tat as been party to any
proceedings before it.
2. Amendments to +ections 1 and 2( allow te CCI to act on information receied; not
0ust a formal complaint.
3. Tere is a statement added to +ection 32; e,plicitly allowing te CCI to pass orders
against acts of firms outside India tat adersely affect competition in India. Te
original prasing seemed to suggest tat te CCI could only inBuire into suc acts.
. Te bill also proposes to delete te ill adised clause tat allowed te CCI to issue
temporary in0unctions to restrain any party from importing goods.
33
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
34/50
&. Te CCI as not been gien powers of searc and sei:ure; wic are crucial in
obtaining eidence in cartel cases in 4urope and te *+; and are een aailable in
+ection 12F&E of te outgoing !"TP Act.
(. +ection 21 of te act is to be amended so tat wen te CCI is asked by a statutoryautority to gie its opinion on any decision tat migt infringe te Competition Act;
te autority is now reBuired to record its response to te CCI opinion.
#. +ection ; wic allowed te central goernment to seek te CCI@s opinion on
formulating a policy on competition; is now to be e,tended to state goernments.
Anoter measure is in te transition arrangements for dealing wit cases pending before te
!"TP CommissionF!"TPCE. Te Competition Act originally enisaged teir immediate
transfer to te CCI. Te new bill sensibly proposes to gie te !"TPC two years to clear te
backlog; so te CCI can concentrate on te Competition Act. 9ut no cange is proposed in te
clauses transferring ongoing inestigations for tese !"TP cases to te CCI
A11.&'0, 3&&0,
1. 4stablisment of a Competition Appellate Tribunal FCATE to ear appeals against te
orders of te CCI and ad0udicate compensation claims arising out of te finding of te
CCI or orders of te tribunal.
2. Age limit of cair person and oter members restricted to (& years.
AD"ANTAGES OF THE COMPETITION ACT:
1E Te foremost ob0ectie of te act is to create an enironment conducie to
competition. Te act does not condemn or oppose te e,istence of a monopoly in te
releant market.
2E Te operation of te act is not confined to transactions strictly witin te boundaries
of India but also suc transactions inoling entities e,i,ting or establised oerseas.
3E 4,plicit definitions and criteria ae been specified in order to access weter a
practice as an appreciable aderse effect on competition.
3
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
35/50
E It is te intention of our legislators tat proisions of te act in its e,tant form sould
not be considered to be immutable and uncangeable.Te intention is promotion of
competition adocacy;creating awareness and imparting training about competition
issues.
SHORTCOMINGS OF THE COMPETITION ACT:
1E It is a body to wic te appeals lie and not an inestigatie agency tat proactiely
goes and seeks out industrial monopolistic practice. As te e,ecutie body is
contemplated at present; it is likely to be a aen for senior bureaucrats; businessmen
and tecnocrats en0oying positions of sinecure.
2E Tere is a lack of mandatory proision compelling persons or entities weter public
or priate to approac te commission tat is compounded by te corresponding
logistical limitations of te commission to be able to take cogni:ance on its own
motion of eery malpractice in te economy.
3E Te IP" laws ae oerriding powers oer te Competition Act in matters related tocompetition abuses.
E Te act proides for e,emptions to mergers and abuse of dominance on grounds like
Keconomic deelopment@ and Kpublic interest@ and in te absence of any clear
definitionGcriteria te releant proisions would be open to arying interpretations.
&E Te proisions in conte,t of te autonomy of te CCI mainly aim at keeping a ceck
on CCI@s functioning by limiting its independence.
3&
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
36/50
CA"E "TD$
;) %ET "A&ARA
Mer'er it Air "aara
/n anuary 1; 2%%( et Airways announced tat it was to buy Air +aara for M&%%
million in an all-cas deal. 4eryting; including +aaraNs assets and infrastructure; would
belong to et Airways. Tis deal would ae been te biggest in IndiaNs aiation istory and te
resulting airline te countryNs largest; ad it gone troug.
!arket reaction to te deal was mi,ed; wit many analysts suggesting tat et Airways
was paying too muc for Air +aara. Te deadline for te deal to be completed was une 21;
2%%(; but in te days before tis; te cances of te takeoer being completed began to look
sakier. et Airways claimed tat a final sticking point was te goernmentNs delay in approing
et cairman $ares 7oyalNs appointment to te Air +aara board. Air +aara countered tat et
Airways ad engineered tis impasse by delaying te reBuest for suc approal; as a way of e,tricating temseles from a deal tey now regretted. et was said to be willing to go aead wit
te deal only if te originally agreed price was lowered by 2%-2&W on te basis of Air +aaraNs
mounting debts; an option wic was firmly re0ected by Air +aara. 8inally bot sides confirmed
tat te deal was off. 8ollowing te failure of te deals; te companies ae now filed lawsuits
seeking damages from eac oter.
3(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_19http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Saharahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naresh_Goyalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Saharahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naresh_Goyalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_19
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
37/50
LT AND (G30) BIRLAT5* T0*-O+*3
Te takeoer of '6T sares was a complicated process inoling '6T demerging its cement
business into *ltra Tec Cemco and 7rasim making an open offer for it. Te stakes were
transferred between employee and family trusts in a di::ying 3-layered sare transaction; ending
wit 7rasim olding te ma0ority stake. All sections of sareolders -- 8Is and small
sareolders -- participated in te open offer.
A D77*3*'. P*3*%.+* &' .5* D*0,
A little more tan tree years ago management consulting firm 9oston Consulting 7roup adised
tat te "s. ;%%%-crore F"s. %-billionE engineering company '6T sould e,it cement. 9C7Ns
prescription is being followed and te "s. 2;2%% crore F"s. 22 billionE deals were finally sealed .
7rasim will own &1.& per cent stake in '6TNs 1(.& million tonne cement business; wic is to be
ied into a new company.
'6TNs 1(. million tonne capacity is now being combined into 7rasimNs own 1.& million
tonne capacity. Tere are serious financial implications.
Te "s. ;%%%-odd crore F"s.% billionE acBuisition costs Fincluding te "s. 1;(% crore debt
liabilityE will start yielding respectable returns only after tree years.
Te cement acBuisition now catapults =umarmangalam 9irla to top of te eap in te
countryNs 31 million tonne per annum FtpaE combined cement capacity. 5e is also te seent
largest cement producer in te world.
atNs more; 7rasim now becomes te worldNs largest cement producer in a single
geograpy. +o wat was initially a pure financial inestment wit 1%.& per cent of '6T in
$oember 2%%1-- wen it bougt out "eliance IndustriesN stake in te company -- became a
rallying point to get full management control.
9y te first week of anuary; 7rasim came back to te table wit an ?alternatie proposal?. It
entailed 7rasim swapping its 1& per cent stake in te parent '6T wit te % per cent stake eld
by te financial institutions in te cement company. Tus; it would be left wit a clean;
3#
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
38/50
indisputable && per cent stake in te cement company wile making an onourable e,it from te
core company.
F.3* &7 U,.30T*%5 C**'.:
*ltraTecNs distribution network is ery widely spread out in te country wit oer &;&%%
dealers and 3%;%%% retailers. *ltraTec en0oys a leadersip position in all of te markets tat it
seres. Te Company as enlisted te support of all of its business associates. Tis includes
dealers; stockiest; retailers; builders and engineers among oters.
9etween *ltraTec and 7rasim; te Aditya 9irla 7roupNs cement capacity is in e,cess of 31
million tpa; of wic 1# million tpa capacity comes from *ltraTec. Tis makes te Aditya 9irla
7roup te eigt largest cement player in te world.
Te 7roup now as 11 composite plants; seen split grinding units; four bulk terminals
Finclusie of one in +ri 'ankaE; and eigt ready mi, concrete plants. Tis accords te 7roup a
strong national presence in te cement sector; wit a leadersip position in seeral states.
India as enormous potential for growt; gien te lower per capita consumption of only 11%
kilos against te global aerage of 2(% kilos at present. Te per capita consumption of cement in
India is peraps te lowest in +out 4ast Asia. In Tailand it is 23 kilos; Cina H 2 kilos;
!alaysia H &2 kilos; and in +out =orea H &1 kilos. India tus offers a tremendous growt
opportunity gien its lower per capita consumption.
Te sareolding pattern of *TCC is &1 per cent wit 7rasim; 12 per cent wit financial
institutions; 11.& per cent wit '6T and te remaining wit institutional and retail sareolders.
Te transaction as created alue for 7rasim and '6T stakeolders; te sare prices of '6T
and 7rasim since te une 2%%3 announcement of te intention of de-merger; ae out-performed
te 9+4 +ense, and tere as been an oerwelming response to te open offer.
7rasim Industries is India@s largest cement maker wit a capacity to make about 33 million
tonnes a year; a sade larger tan its nearest rial; te 5olcim-7u0arat Ambu0a-ACC combine;
wic makes about 31 million tonnes. !r. 9irla also outlined an ambitious e,pansion
programme for *ltraTec. Te company@s cape, plans include an e,penditure of around "s
1;2 crore to be spent oer te ne,t tree years. /f tis; "s crore is for captie power plants
in 7u0arat and Catisgar. Te company also wants to tap te growing cement market in
soutern India and is sceduled to inest "s 1;2# crore for a -million tonne plant in Andra
Prades. Tis also includes 1.3 million-tonne split grinding unit and a (-! power plant.
3
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
39/50
Te goernment@s initiaties on infrastructure deelopment and te boom in te ousing
sector are ma0or growt driers for te cement industry. Te Indian cement sector is te world@s
second-largest after Cina.In te medium term; te demand and supply situation is e,pected to
be in a state of balance; before te ne,t cycle of new capacity enters te market.
3
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
40/50
NETSCAPE "/S MICROSOFT
$etscape Communications; a diision of A/' Time arner; filed suit against !icrosoft claiming
tat te software giantNs business practices crused te onetime upstartNs Internet browser.
Te lawsuit alleges tat; beginning in 1&; !icrosoft armed $etscape in a series of illegal acts
aimed at promoting !icrosoftNs Internet 4,plorer browser at te e,pense of $etscape $aigator;
te eb browser by $etscape many credit wit aing been te catalyst for consumer adoption
of te Internet. Te suit seeks in0unctie relief sufficient to preent furter antitrust in0ury to
$etscape and an award of treble damages to be determined at trial.
In $oember 1; udge Tomas Penfield ackson ad also found tat wile !icrosoft ad
improperly used its dominance of te PC operating system market to grab a (% percent sare of
te browser market.
?$etscapeNs lawsuit is a sort of an e,tension of te findings entered by te
it lost browser licensing reenues it lost browser market sare tat would ae led to oter
significant sources of reenues; including portal reenues and reenues from its enterprise
software and products businesses its marketing and distribution costs were significantly
increased it lost goodwill and going concern alue and it lost te profits tat would ae e,isted
if !icrosoft ad not acted illegally to preent $etscapeNs browser tecnology from proiding a
competitie alternatie to !icrosoftNs monopoly operating system as a deelopment platform
COMPARISON BETWEEN MRTP ACT9;
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
41/50
S$N& MRTP A%.9 ;
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
42/50
C3.%0, %&*'. &' .5* C&*..&' A%.
Toug te Act substantially coers all aspects; it still leaes ample scope for improements.Assimilation of CCI as a corporate body and at te same time describing it as a Tribunal makes it
of a somewat ybrid caracter. Toug as a corporate body it can sue and be sued; as a Buasi-
0udicial body it cannot; generally do so. Te position as to be clarified.
Tere are two proisions in te Act wic substantially defeat its independence. +ection &%
proides for grants by te Central 7oernment to CCI. Te Act proides tat te salaries of te
staff and oter e,penses sall be met by te Competition 8und. 5ere lies te catc. +uc a
proision takes away te independence and autonomy of CCI by including grants by te Central
7oernment as a part of te constitution of te Competition 8und. Tus; CCI as to circuitously
depend on te Central 7oernment for meeting its infrastructural and oter e,penses. 8urter;
CCI is bound to follow any policy directions gien by te Central 7oernment. And; +ection &(
empowers te Central 7oernment to supersede CCI by issuing a notification and giing reasons
for te same. CCI being a Buasi-0udicial body would be appointed by te e,ecutie and suc
power to supersede would seerely affect te independent functioning of te Commission. /n
one and; it is said tat CCI is a Buasi-0udicial body and on te oter and; te Act mandates tat
its decisions are not final. 4en te !"TP Act neer ad any suc proision.
+ome of te market analysts ae appreended tat implementation of te Act in its present form
will be noting less tan a declaration to kill our national companies. Te Act talks of
competition but; at te national leel; it is a competition between a mouse and a cat. Te Act is
opening te entire country to te world for competition. Te Act does not retain any specific
proisions to protect te interests of te domestic industry; wic is e,posed to international
competition unlike te *+ law. Tere +ection 2%1 of te Trade Act; 1# of te *+ as been
applied to increase imports regardless of weter teir importation is te result of any unfair
competition. Te only concern under +ection 2%1 is %hether the imports are a sustantial cause
of serious in/ury to a US industry te specific trading practices of te foreign seller; fair or
unfair; are irreleant. If te reBuisite in0ury and causation are establised; and relief ordered and
accepted by te President; tat relief operates against all imports i.e. from all foreign producers
in all countries.
2
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
43/50
+imilarly; Title QII of te Trade Agreements Act of 1# and +ection 33# of te Tariff Act of
13% apply broadly to unfair metods of competition and unfair actsS in *+ import trade; but in
practice it as been applied essentially to e,clude imports tat infringe on *+ patent rigts or
iolate oter intellectual property rigts; suc as trademarks and copyrigts. 'ooked in tis
perspectie it is felt tat te legislature must incorporate proisions to safeguard te domestic
industries against te fierce global economic competition.
Cartels; particularly te ard-core cartels ae a grae and aderse effect on te economy and
consumers; and as tey are difficult to detect and proe; te proisions sould be as deterrent as
possible. It is suggested tat to make te law more preentie; te Act sould incorporate
criminal proceedings against te persons inoled at te appropriate criminal court in case te
cartel is proed. Te *= recently amended its competition law to include personal criminal
liability. Te releant law of te *+ also incorporates suc penal proisions and e,perience as
sown tat tey ae ad a considerable deterrent effect.
8urter; te Act fails to proide a stick and carrotS approac in te form of eay fines and
criminal proceedings against te iolators coupled wit te promise of leniency for te wistle-
blower wic as been proed to be ery effectie in uncoering and prosecuting ard-core
cartels in many countries including te *+ and 4*.
Article % of T"IP+ proides for control of anticompetitie practices in contractual licences. It
says tat T"IP+ does not preent countries from specifying in teir legislation licensing practices
or conditions tat may in practice constitute an abuse of intellectual property rigts FIP"sSE
aing an aderse effect on competition in te releant market. +imilarly; Article 31 of T"IP+
allows granting of compulsory licences in anticompetitie situations. A good competition law
cannot afford to be silent in addressing IP"s in tis fast-canging global economic enironment.
9ut te Indian law ide +ection 3F&E of te Act e,cludes licensing agreementsS wit respect to
IP"s from te puriew of regulating anticompetitie agreements. /ften it as been e,perienced
tat IP" relationsip between two firms end up in cartels or anticompetitie conducts. CCI is
reBuired to keep an eye on suc relationsips as a part of its proactie role. +o; unless tere is
some proision wit respect to IP" in te Act; CCI may tend to ignore suc relationsips as te
same does not lie under its 0urisdiction.
Te Act regulates only tose mergers and acBuisitions wic Bualify under te definition of
combinationS under +ection &. In practice; tere may come up a situation were a merger may
3
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
44/50
not come under te definition of combinationS under +ection &; largely because of te
bencmarks prescribed terein; yet it may gie rise to grae anticompetitie practices. Tis
situation as to be aoided.
8urter; mergers of companies are being goerned by te 5ig Courts and te +ecurities and
4,cange 9oard of India; and now te same would be witin te puriew of CCI. It is felt tat
tis may gie rise to a peculiar situation were tere may be oerlapping of powers of tree
distinct forums wit regard to mergers.
+ection 1F3E of te Act lays si, factors for determining weter an agreement as an
appreciable aderse effect on competitionS.Xet te language of te sub-section tends to create
confusion wile interpreting te same. Clauses FaE to FcE of +ection 1F3E are te grounds wic
te Commission may consider wile establising appreciable aderse effectS; wereas clauses
Fd E to F f E proide te defences and e,emptions wic may be releant to negate te presence of
appreciable aderse effectS. Te intent would ae been clearer ad separate sections on bot
tese aspects been proided.
Te Act confers an option on any statutory body to make a reference to CCI wit respect to a
decision wic te statutory autority as taken or proposes to take; is or is likely to be contrary
to any of te proisions of te Act. 5oweer; for making suc a reference te condition
precedent is raising of te same issue by any party before it. It is suggested tat apart from issue
being raised by any party; any statutory autority also on its own sould ae been allowed to
make suc a reference.
8urter; CCI sould also ae been empowered; on approal by te Central 7oernment; to
inBuire and inestigate on its own in any sector being regulated by a statutory autority; if it feels
tat an anticompetitie situation as arisen or is likely to arise.
8inally; +ection 32 autorises CCI only to inBuireS for acts taking place outside India but
aing an effect on competition in India. It is suggested tat CCI sould ae also been gien
powers to pass appropriate ordersS apart from inBuiring in suc matters. Te Act sould also
ae incorporated proisions conferring necessary powers to te Commission seeking
cooperation from autorities in oter countries in inestigation and implementation of its orders
wit respect to cross-border anticompetitie practices.
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
45/50
CONCLUSION
All of us can agree on te benefits of adopting and enforcing a transparent and nondiscriminatory
competition law. 8irst; at te domestic leel; te enforcement of competition rules preents
monopoli:ation; as well as collusie and e,clusionary practices tat enable firms wit market
power to unfairly confiscate te benefits of economic actiity tat sould accrue to consumers
and competitors.
+econd; at te international leel; istory demonstrates tat cross border cartels tend to operate in
countries witout competition laws to enance teir immunity from prosecution tey likewise
tend to aoid countries tat ae actiely enforced competition laws. I also doubt tat oter
anticompetitie actors ae any Bualms about foisting te costs of teir conduct on consumers in
countries tat lack a competition law. Adopting a competition law is tus an important means for
protecting oneNs own consumers from te cross-border anticompetitie practices of firms.
Tird; competition autorities can be agents of market-opening cange in teir countries troug
teir role as competition adocates. +eeral competition autorities in 'atin and +out America
ae recently contributed greatly to eliminating restrictie regulations in sectors tat were
preiously not open to competition; troug adocacy on bealf of priati:ation or deregulation.e too continue to adocate aggressiely on bealf of competition principles wit te federal
electricity regulator; te arious state public utility commissions; te federal communications
agency and entities tat elp to sape intellectual property policy.
9ut promoting competition in any country is a callenge; precisely because te benefits of
competition are long term and are distributed broadly among all consumers; wereas te benefits
of protection are immediate and concentrated on a few recipients. Tus; powerful and well
organi:ed lobbies tend to be Buite effectie in preenting te emergence of competition. Xet 0ust
were tese lobbies may be most powerful -- in smaller; deeloping markets wit narrow
economic bases and concentrated industrial sectors -- is were anticompetitie practices are most
likely to flouris and were te need is greatest to promote competition troug priati:ation;
deregulation and te adoption of a competition law.
&
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
46/50
Te Indian legislature deseres accolades for te introduction tis muc-needed piece of
legislation. In retrospect; te igligt of te Act is its intent; wic not only proibits
anticompetitie agreements; wic are detrimental to te consumers and te market; but also
proibits any agreement tat is likely to cause an appreciable aderse effect on competition.
In a deeloping economy like India were economic power is not fairly distributed; tis new
competition policy is e,pected to play te dual role of raising te power; witin reasonable
bounds; of underpriileged economic agents to become iable participants in te process of
competition on te one and; and of establising te rules of fair and free competition on te
oter.
If tese two ob0ecties are not met; unfettered competition will simply elp a andful of
priileged big firms to monopoli:e domestic markets tat are usually protected troug import
restrictions. Tis will ten gie rise to public dissatisfaction.
+econdly; fair and freeS competition is an essential reBuirement for sustained economic growt.
itout fairness; freedom alone may not aciee te desirable outcomes e,pected from
competition; especially in deeloping economies were unfair elements can be e,acerbated by
competition.
India is likely to emerge as te second largest market in te world in te not so distant future. In
tis scenario te CCI will be e,pected to play a balanced role; protecting bot consumers@
interests and te interests of te businessmen. Te CCI will also ae an important task of
collaborating wit te arious sectoral regulators and erein competition adocacy will play and
important role.
Te CCI as te power to>
•
Issue cease and desist orders
• 7rant interim relief
• Award compensation
(
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
47/50
• Impose fines and
• /rder diision of dominant undertakings
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
48/50
Te efficacy of te act will be seen in its implementation. 9ut is te Competition Act truly
reflectie of te canging economic milieu of our countryZ In an economic situation; wic can
be best described as a mi,ed economy only time will tell weter te Competition Act addresses
te ground realities tat e,ist today. 5oweer; te new Act is definitely a step in te rigt
direction by armoni:ing te competition policy wit international trade and policy.
The purpose of competition policy and competition la% 0 is to protect competition and economic
efficiency, not to protect competitors" #t1s to protect the efficiency of the process, not the existence or the
viaility of individual companies"
Competition la% is essentially a ac-up" #f the maret runs eautifully, the Commissioner should e
asleep" 0 The reality is the maret does not %or on a perfectly good self-sustaining asis and there are
competitors %ho %ill see to fix prices" There are competitors %ho %ill exercise their maret po%er in
%ays that are unacceptale to society and %e simply have to hit them 0 and say $no"$
----- Competition commission of #ndia
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
49/50
BIBILIOGRAPHY
Books
Corporate Law -- By Taxman
Corporate Laws and Secretarial Practice -- By G.K.Kapoor
Websites
www.competition-commission-india.nic.in
www.laws4india.com
www.ftc.gov.in
www.nctadxi.org
www.mti.gov.sg
www.!lonnet.com
www.iima"d.ernet.in
www.c!dd.ws.ed
www.oft.gov.#
http://www.competition-commission-india.nic.in/http://www.laws4india.com/http://www.ftc.gov.in/http://www.unctadxi.org/http://www.mti.gov.sg/http://www.blonnet.com/http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/http://www.cbdd.wsu.edu/http://www.oft.gov.uk/http://www.competition-commission-india.nic.in/http://www.laws4india.com/http://www.ftc.gov.in/http://www.unctadxi.org/http://www.mti.gov.sg/http://www.blonnet.com/http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/http://www.cbdd.wsu.edu/http://www.oft.gov.uk/
8/18/2019 7319546 Competetion Act
50/50