+ All Categories
Home > Documents > #75 Enabling efficient use of digital health technologies ...Final Notes received from EMA. CPIM...

#75 Enabling efficient use of digital health technologies ...Final Notes received from EMA. CPIM...

Date post: 08-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Jesse M. Cedarbaum 3* , Kirsten Taylor 2,15 , Derek Hill 1 , Robert Alexander 8 , Yijia Luo 8 , Rob Rubens 8 , Neta Zach 8 , Josh Cosman 3 , Ariel Dowling 8 , Katherine Fisher 3 , Lauren Oliva 3 , Janice Hitchcock 1 , Michael Lawton 1 , Daniela Conrado 1+ , Klaus Romero 1 , Michael Minchik 1 , Didier Meulien 4 , Beatrice Yang 4 , Mark Forman 5# , Lauren Bataille , Mark Frasier 6 , David T. Dexter 7 , Jill Gallagher 7 , Michael Braxenthaler 2 , Michael Lindemann 2 , Babak Boroojerdi 9 , Ole Graff 10 , Luis Garcia-Gancedo 10 , Glenn Stebbins 11 , Bastiaan R. Bloem 12 , Michele T. Hu 13 , E. Ray Dorsey 14 , Diane Stephenson 1 , on behalf of the Critical Path for Parkinson’s Consortium Critical Path Institute 1 ; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd 2 ; Biogen 3 ; Lundbeck 4 ; Merck 5 ; Michael J Fox Foundation 6 ; Parkinson’s UK 7 ; Takeda 8 ; UCB 9 ; GlaxoSmithKline 10 ; Rush University 11 ; Radboud University Medical Centre 12 ; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford 13 ; University of Rochester 14 ; University of Basel 15 current affiliations: *Coeruleus Clinical Sciences; + e-Quantify; # ACADIA, © Novartis CPP’s 3DT effort has made significant progress on the goal of reaching a shared understanding of the open regulatory and scientific issues in the use of digital health technologies as endpoints in PD clinical trials, using the WATCH-PD study as a case e xample By seeking regulatory Agency feedback in precompetitive forums on how to maximize the value of the WATCH-PD pilot study in advancing the regulatory maturity of these digital technologies, multiple sponsors have been informed on issues to attend to for optimizing the use of digital technologies in future clinical trials CPP aims to encourage the sharing of positive and negative experiences with digital health technologies in PD and align with regulators early and often to maximize knowledge and minimize duplication of efforts across sponsors, drug development programs, and geographies The CPP consortium model including alignment with regulatory agencies and data core competencies is well placed to fill gaps to enable efficiencies in the use of digital health technologies as drug development tools in PD Enabling efficient use of digital health technologies to support Parkinson's disease drug development through precompetitive collaboration One major challenge to developing therapies that slow or halt Parkinson’s disease (PD) progression is the paucity of sensitive, clinically interpretable tools that can capture clinically meaningful aspects of the disease in its earliest stages. Digital health technologies have the potential to enable measurement of PD signs and symptoms objectively, remotely, and frequently in natural environments during activities that are meaningful to patients’ daily lives. Several PD clinical trials are already implementing digital technologies [1-3]. For these technologies to have widespread drug development impact, a regulatory-aligned consensus is required on best practice in selecting appropriate technologies and in collecting and processing digital data aimed at monitoring disease progression. Objectives: To describe the Critical Path for Parkinson’s (CPP) consortium approach to advance the field of digital technologies in clinical drug development for PD. To seek regulatory Agency feedback on the most efficient way to optimize a prospective observational study as a case study that may inform future PD clinical studies employing digital health technologies. 1) Silva de Lima AL, Hahn T, Evers LJW, de Vries NM, Cohen E, Afek M, et al. (2017). PLoS ONE 12(12):e0189161. 2) Lipsmeier, F. et al. Movement Disorders (2018).33(8): 1287-1297 Background Conclusions CRITICAL PATH FOR PARKINSON’S CPP is a global public-private partnership whose mission is to enhance the efficiency of clinical trials targeting early stages of PD. CPP was launched in 2015 with a major goal to develop tools to quantify disease progression Successfully acquired and integrated patient-level data from >8100 PD patients Qualification of imaging biomarker for enrichment of trials in early PD [4] Current CPP focus is regulatory endorsement of a PD drug disease trial model The Digital Drug Development Tools (3DT) team was launched in 2018 with the goal of advancing regulatory readiness of digital health technologies in PD trials (Biogen, Takeda, GSK, Lundbeck, UCB, Merck, Roche, Michael J Fox Foundation, Parkinson’s UK, and academic experts from University of Rochester, Rush University), with a focus on early motor PD. References PMD Alliance Parkinson’s UK REGULATORY AGENCY FORUMS FOR ENGAGEMENT AND FEEDBACK FDA Critical Path Innovation Meeting (CPIM): A forum to meet with the FDA to receive cross-Agency feedback on how novel methodologies might enhance drug development EMA Innovative Task Force (ITF): A discussion platform for early dialogue with the Agency to proactively identify scientific, legal, and regulatory issues of emerging therapies and technologies TIMELINE OF 3DT TEAM PROGRESS SUMMARY OF REGULATORY FEEDBACK Recognize the importance of seeking guidance in the early stage of digital health technology and study planning Evaluation of motor, non-motor, and mood-related endpoints is important Incorporate the patients’ perspective of how they function and feel by performing interviews and conducting quality-of-life surveys to compare to digital measures Both Agencies noted the importance of collecting normative digital health data from healthy individuals It may be beneficial to enroll subjects at the earliest point possible in their disease progression TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS Patient factors: Adherence with home data collection and effect of differences in patients’ environments and lifestyle on variability of measurements Data quality: Access to raw data, effect of software/firmware updates, dealing with missing data, transparency of algorithms Data analysis methods: Comparators for evaluation of novel measures REGULATORY ADVICE: NEXT STEPS FDA: The review division will continue to have iterative, disease-specific discussions with CPP, including strategies for establishing meaningful clinical endpoint EMA: Identify a small, well-defined digital measure and return to EMA for scientific advice with a focused, data-driven development path CPP FUTURE STRATEGY Align on data-driven path for acquiring digital device data from relevant PD studies to inform future clinical trials Next Steps: CPP is reaching out to stakeholders to prepare a comprehensive digital data inventory of PD clinical studies and a Voice-of-the-Patient inventory to capture what is bothersome to people living with PD. Such data is key to informing the near- and long- term future paths. The Critical Path Institute’s CPP Consortium is funded by Parkinson’s UK and the following industry members: AbbVie, Biogen, Denali, GSK, H. Lundbeck A/S, Merck Sharp and Dohme, F. Hoffmann La Roche, IXICO, Sanofi Genzyme, Takeda and UCB. We also acknowledge additional CPP member organizations, including The Cure Parkinson’s Trust, Davis Phinney Foundation, Michael J. Fox Foundation, Newcastle University, Parkinson’s Foundation, Radboud University, University of Cambridge, University of Glasgow, University of Oxford, NINDS, FDA, and EMA. CPP acknowledges the strong support from FDA colleagues Dr. Billy Dunn and Dr. Gerald Podskalny, and EMA colleagues Prof. Maria Tome, Prof. Pavel Balabanov and Prof. Corrine de Vries. CPP acknowledges the leadership of Marjan Meinders and John Hall for their outreach on behalf of their role in helping to lead the CPP digital data inventory taskforce. OCT 2018 NOV 2018 DEC 2019 JAN 2019 FEB 2019 MAR 2019 APR 2019 MAY 2019 JUNE 2019 JULY 2019 AUG 2019 3DT Project Launch CPIM request sent to FDA CPIM meeting at FDA FDA summary received ITF request and briefing document sent to EMA ITF meeting, at EMA Final Notes received from EMA CPIM prep meeting, Tucson 2019 CPP annual meeting Acknowledgements Results Stages of PD and aspects amenable to quantitation using digital health technologies Adapted from Poewe W, et al. Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 017 Mar 23;3:17013 #75 3) Boroojerdi, B., Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 2019: 61: 70-76 4) Stephenson et al., J Parkinsons Dis. (2019); 9(3):553-563 CASE STUDY TO ENGAGE REGULATORY AGENCIES The CPP 3DT team is leveraging a prospective study called WATCH-PD (Wearable Assessments in The Clinic and Home in PD) as a case study to support discussions with regulatory agencies. WATCH-PD is a 12-month multi-center, longitudinal, digital assessment study of progression in subjects with early, untreated PD. WATCH-PD study goals: Primary goal: To generate a set of candidate objective digital measures to complement standard clinical assessments in measuring the progression of early-stage PD and response to standard of care treatment Secondary goal: To understand the relationship between standard clinical assessments, research-grade digital tools used in a clinic setting, and more user-friendly consumer digital platforms to develop a scalable approach for objective, sensitive, and frequent collection of motor and non-motor data in early PD
Transcript
Page 1: #75 Enabling efficient use of digital health technologies ...Final Notes received from EMA. CPIM prep meeting, Tucson. 2019 CPP annual meeting. Acknowledgements. Results. Stages of

Jesse M. Cedarbaum3*, Kirsten Taylor2,15, Derek Hill1, Robert Alexander8, Yijia Luo8, Rob Rubens8, Neta Zach8, Josh Cosman3, Ariel Dowling8, Katherine Fisher3, Lauren Oliva3, Janice Hitchcock1, Michael Lawton1, Daniela Conrado1+, Klaus Romero1, Michael Minchik1, Didier Meulien4, Beatrice Yang4, Mark Forman5#, Lauren Bataille6©, Mark Frasier6, David T. Dexter7, Jill Gallagher7, Michael Braxenthaler2, Michael Lindemann2, Babak Boroojerdi9, Ole Graff10 , Luis Garcia-Gancedo10, Glenn Stebbins11, Bastiaan R. Bloem12, Michele T. Hu13, E. Ray Dorsey14, Diane Stephenson1, on behalf of the Critical Path for Parkinson’s ConsortiumCritical Path Institute1; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd2; Biogen3; Lundbeck4; Merck5; Michael J Fox Foundation6; Parkinson’s UK7; Takeda8; UCB9; GlaxoSmithKline10; Rush University11; Radboud University Medical Centre12; Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford13; University of Rochester14 ; University of Basel15

current affiliations: *Coeruleus Clinical Sciences; +e-Quantify; #ACADIA, ©Novartis

CPP’s 3DT effort has made significant progress on the goal of reaching a shared understanding of the open regulatory and scientific issues in the use of digital health technologies asendpoints in PD clinical trials, using the WATCH-PD study as a case example

By seeking regulatory Agency feedback in precompetitive forums on how to maximize the value of the WATCH-PD pilot study in advancing the regulatory maturity of these digitaltechnologies, multiple sponsors have been informed on issues to attend to for optimizing the use of digital technologies in future clinical trials

CPP aims to encourage the sharing of positive and negative experiences with digital health technologies in PD and align with regulators early and often to maximize knowledge andminimize duplication of efforts across sponsors, drug development programs, and geographies

The CPP consortium model including alignment with regulatory agencies and data core competencies is well placed to fill gaps to enable efficiencies in the use of digital healthtechnologies as drug development tools in PD

Enabling efficient use of digital health technologies to support Parkinson's disease drug development

through precompetitive collaboration

One major challenge to developing therapies that slow or halt Parkinson’s disease (PD) progression is the paucity of sensitive, clinically interpretable tools that can capture clinicallymeaningful aspects of the disease in its earliest stages. Digital health technologies have the potential to enable measurement of PD signs and symptoms objectively, remotely, andfrequently in natural environments during activities that are meaningful to patients’ daily lives. Several PD clinical trials are already implementing digital technologies [1-3]. For thesetechnologies to have widespread drug development impact, a regulatory-aligned consensus is required on best practice in selecting appropriate technologies and in collecting andprocessing digital data aimed at monitoring disease progression.Objectives: To describe the Critical Path for Parkinson’s (CPP) consortium approach to advance the field of digital technologies in clinical drug development for PD. To seek regulatoryAgency feedback on the most efficient way to optimize a prospective observational study as a case study that may inform future PD clinical studies employing digital health technologies.

1) Silva de Lima AL, Hahn T, Evers LJW, de Vries NM, Cohen E, Afek M, et al. (2017). PLoS ONE 12(12):e0189161. 2) Lipsmeier, F. et al. Movement Disorders (2018).33(8): 1287-1297

Background

Conclusions

CRITICAL PATH FOR PARKINSON’SCPP is a global public-private partnership whose mission is to enhance the efficiency ofclinical trials targeting early stages of PD.

CPP was launched in 2015 with a majorgoal to develop tools to quantifydisease progression

Successfully acquired and integratedpatient-level data from >8100 PDpatients

Qualification of imaging biomarker forenrichment of trials in early PD [4]

Current CPP focus is regulatoryendorsement of a PD drug disease trialmodel

The Digital Drug Development Tools (3DT) team was launched in 2018 with the goal ofadvancing regulatory readiness of digital health technologies in PD trials (Biogen, Takeda,GSK, Lundbeck, UCB, Merck, Roche, Michael J Fox Foundation, Parkinson’s UK, andacademic experts from University of Rochester, Rush University), with a focus on earlymotor PD.

References

• PMD Alliance• Parkinson’s UK

REGULATORY AGENCY FORUMS FOR ENGAGEMENT AND FEEDBACK FDA Critical Path Innovation Meeting (CPIM): A forum to meet with the FDA to

receive cross-Agency feedback on how novel methodologies might enhance drugdevelopment

EMA Innovative Task Force (ITF): A discussion platform for early dialogue with theAgency to proactively identify scientific, legal, and regulatory issues of emergingtherapies and technologies

TIMELINE OF 3DT TEAM PROGRESS

SUMMARY OF REGULATORY FEEDBACK Recognize the importance of seeking guidance in the early stage of digital health

technology and study planning Evaluation of motor, non-motor, and mood-related endpoints is important Incorporate the patients’ perspective of how they function and feel by performing

interviews and conducting quality-of-life surveys to compare to digital measures Both Agencies noted the importance of collecting normative digital health data from

healthy individuals It may be beneficial to enroll subjects at the earliest point possible in their disease

progression

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Patient factors: Adherence with home data collection and effect of differences inpatients’ environments and lifestyle on variability of measurements Data quality: Access to raw data, effect of software/firmware updates, dealing with

missing data, transparency of algorithms Data analysis methods: Comparators for evaluation of novel measures

REGULATORY ADVICE: NEXT STEPS

FDA: The review division will continue to have iterative, disease-specific discussionswith CPP, including strategies for establishing meaningful clinical endpoint

EMA: Identify a small, well-defined digital measure and return to EMA for scientificadvice with a focused, data-driven development path

CPP FUTURE STRATEGY

Align on data-driven path for acquiring digital device data from relevant PD studies toinform future clinical trials

Next Steps: CPP is reaching out to stakeholders to prepare a comprehensive digital datainventory of PD clinical studies and a Voice-of-the-Patient inventory to capture what isbothersome to people living with PD. Such data is key to informing the near- and long-term future paths.

The Critical Path Institute’s CPP Consortium is funded by Parkinson’s UK and the following industry members: AbbVie, Biogen, Denali, GSK, H. Lundbeck A/S, Merck Sharp and Dohme, F. Hoffmann La Roche, IXICO, Sanofi Genzyme, Takeda and UCB. We also acknowledge additional CPP memberorganizations, including The Cure Parkinson’s Trust, Davis Phinney Foundation, Michael J. Fox Foundation, Newcastle University, Parkinson’s Foundation, Radboud University, University of Cambridge, University of Glasgow, University of Oxford, NINDS, FDA, and EMA. CPP acknowledges the strongsupport from FDA colleagues Dr. Billy Dunn and Dr. Gerald Podskalny, and EMA colleagues Prof. Maria Tome, Prof. Pavel Balabanov and Prof. Corrine de Vries. CPP acknowledges the leadership of Marjan Meinders and John Hall for their outreach on behalf of their role in helping to lead the CPPdigital data inventory taskforce.

OCT2018

NOV2018

DEC2019

JAN2019

FEB2019

MAR2019

APR2019

MAY2019

JUNE2019

JULY2019

AUG2019

3DT Project Launch CPIM request sent to FDA

CPIM meeting at FDA

FDA summary received

ITF request and briefing document sent to EMA

ITF meeting, at EMA

Final Notes received from

EMA

CPIM prep meeting, Tucson

2019 CPP annual meeting

Acknowledgements

Results

Stages of PD and aspectsamenable to quantitation using digital health technologies

Adapted from Poewe W, et al. Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 017 Mar 23;3:17013

#75

3) Boroojerdi, B., Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 2019: 61: 70-764) Stephenson et al., J Parkinsons Dis. (2019); 9(3):553-563

CASE STUDY TO ENGAGE REGULATORY AGENCIESThe CPP 3DT team is leveraging a prospective study called WATCH-PD (WearableAssessments in The Clinic and Home in PD) as a case study to support discussions withregulatory agencies. WATCH-PD is a 12-month multi-center, longitudinal, digitalassessment study of progression in subjects with early, untreated PD.WATCH-PD study goals:Primary goal: To generate a set of candidate objective digital measures to complementstandard clinical assessments in measuring the progression of early-stage PD andresponse to standard of care treatmentSecondary goal: To understand the relationship between standard clinical assessments,research-grade digital tools used in a clinic setting, and more user-friendly consumerdigital platforms to develop a scalable approach for objective, sensitive, and frequentcollection of motor and non-motor data in early PD

Recommended