+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 8 NOISE AND VIBRATION 8.1 SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL...

8 NOISE AND VIBRATION 8.1 SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL...

Date post: 05-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: dangcong
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
18
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL ABERNEDD POWER PLANT 8-1 8 NOISE AND VIBRATION 8.1 SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL IMPACTS No significant residual impacts for the construction and operation of the proposed CCGT power plant development are expected as these will be mitigated through design and planning conditions as appropriate. A temporary residual noise impact as a result of road traffic noise from personnel vehicles associated with the construction of the scheme is expected on residents living alongside the A48. This will only occur in the hours when construction personnel will be travelling to and from site, during the peak month of the 30 month Stage 1 construction period. During commissioning there will be short periods between the hours of 09:00hrs and 17:30hrs when pipelines will be subjected to purging flows and safety valves tested. These operations are short-term in duration, but can cause high levels of noise and therefore result in temporary residual noise impacts. These activities will take place occasionally and will last only a few hours at a time. No significant construction or operational vibration impacts are expected. 8.2 INTRODUCTION This chapter considers the potential for noise and vibration impacts associated with the construction and operation of the proposed power station at the Baglan Bay Energy Park. The site is adjacent to the GE power station and the M4 motorway. The proposed scheme will introduce a new and permanent source of noise in the area. 8.3 LEGISLATION AND POLICY REVIEW The aim of noise policy within Wales is to protect individuals from excessive noise levels both in the workplace and when at home. It has been recognised that noise can cause annoyance and can lead to sleep disturbance and potentially other adverse health effects. Legislation has aimed to address this. Regulations, mainly at EU level, have set maximum sound levels for vehicles, aeroplanes and machines. More recently the European Commission has requested mapping of noise levels and the development of Action Plans to address noise problems where necessary, including preservation of quiet areas. At national level, the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) has been developing an Ambient Noise Strategy giving policy guidance on transportation and industrial noise. Planning Guidance (TAN 11) has also been important in promoting ways of reducing noise problems in the future. Some local
Transcript

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-1

8 NOISE AND VIBRATION

8.1 SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL IMPACTS

No significant residual impacts for the construction and operation of the

proposed CCGT power plant development are expected as these will be

mitigated through design and planning conditions as appropriate.

A temporary residual noise impact as a result of road traffic noise from

personnel vehicles associated with the construction of the scheme is

expected on residents living alongside the A48. This will only occur in the

hours when construction personnel will be travelling to and from site,

during the peak month of the 30 month Stage 1 construction period.

During commissioning there will be short periods between the hours of

09:00hrs and 17:30hrs when pipelines will be subjected to purging flows

and safety valves tested. These operations are short-term in duration, but

can cause high levels of noise and therefore result in temporary residual

noise impacts. These activities will take place occasionally and will last

only a few hours at a time.

No significant construction or operational vibration impacts are expected.

8.2 INTRODUCTION

This chapter considers the potential for noise and vibration impacts

associated with the construction and operation of the proposed power

station at the Baglan Bay Energy Park. The site is adjacent to the GE power

station and the M4 motorway. The proposed scheme will introduce a new

and permanent source of noise in the area.

8.3 LEGISLATION AND POLICY REVIEW

The aim of noise policy within Wales is to protect individuals from

excessive noise levels both in the workplace and when at home. It has been

recognised that noise can cause annoyance and can lead to sleep

disturbance and potentially other adverse health effects. Legislation has

aimed to address this. Regulations, mainly at EU level, have set maximum

sound levels for vehicles, aeroplanes and machines. More recently the

European Commission has requested mapping of noise levels and the

development of Action Plans to address noise problems where necessary,

including preservation of quiet areas. At national level, the Department of

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) has been developing an

Ambient Noise Strategy giving policy guidance on transportation and

industrial noise. Planning Guidance (TAN 11) has also been important in

promoting ways of reducing noise problems in the future. Some local

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-2

authorities also produce their own local planning guidance as part of their

development plans. Relevant policies are discussed in greater detail in

Section 8.4 below.

8.4 ASSESSMENT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

8.4.1 Introduction

The approach to this assessment has been discussed and agreed in

consultation with Neath and Port Talbot County Borough Council. The

scope of this assessment, and the assessment methodology and criteria are

discussed below.

8.4.2 Scope of Assessment

The assessment included the following tasks:

• defining noise sensitive receptors (NSRs) in consultation with NPTCBC;

• defining the baseline noise environment by measurement at

representative NSRs;

• assessing construction noise and vibration impacts at representative

NSRs;

• assessing road traffic noise impacts from construction and operation;

and

• defining acceptable operational noise and vibration levels for the

proposed development.

8.4.3 Construction Assessment Methodology and Criteria

Advice and guidelines to local planning authorities and developers on

construction noise in the UK can be found in British Standard BS 5228 (1)

and Advisory Leaflet (AL) 72 (2). AL 72 is out of print, but remains as a

paper giving guidance on acceptable levels of construction noise.

BS 5228 Part 1 does not specify suitable daytime noise levels from

construction sites, but lists a number of factors that might affect the

acceptability of noise and vibration from construction sites. These factors

are:

(1) British Standard BS 5228: 1997 ‘Noise control on construction and open sites’. BSI. 1997. (2) Advisory Leaflet 72. ‘Noise control on building sites’. Department of the Environment. 1976.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-3

• site location;

• existing ambient noise levels;

• duration of site operations;

• hours of work;

• attitude to site operator; and

• noise and vibration characteristics of the work.

Although BS 5228 does not propose noise standards for daytime periods, it

suggests that acceptable noise levels in the evening (1900 - 2200 hours) may

need to be 10 dB(A) lower than daytime levels. AL 72 gives advice on

preferred maximum levels of construction site noise at residential locations

during daytime hours (0700 – 1900 hours). Since the criterion of speech

interference forms the basis of the recommendations within AL 72, they can

be taken as applicable to commercial buildings as well as residential

properties. The leaflet states that the noise level outside the nearest

occupied room should not exceed:

• 75 dB(A) in urban areas near to main roads in heavy industrial areas; or

• 70 dB(A) in rural, suburban and urban areas away from main road

traffic and industrial noise.

These levels are generally taken as being facade LAeq, period (1) and will be

used to assess potential construction noise impacts.

Local authorities have powers under the Control of Pollution Act 1974 to

control noise from construction sites. These powers do not refer to fixed

noise limits but instead allow for the enforcement of ‘best practicable

means’ (2) to reduce or counteract the effects of the noise.

It is assumed that the construction work will take place over a five day

working week, with the maximum working hours of 0700 to 1900 hours.

A Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) will set working hours and noise

control measures, and will be agreed with NPTCBC prior to construction

work commencing.

8.4.4 Operational Noise Assessment Methodology and Criteria

Overview

Noise from developments is assessed in two ways:

• by comparing the predicted level of noise from the development

against absolute noise standards, such as those that indicate likely

(1) LAeq is defined as the notional steady sound level which, over a stated period of time, would contain the same

amount of acoustical energy as the A-weighted fluctuating sound measured over that period. (2) Defined in Section 72 of the Control of Pollution Act 1974.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-4

annoyance and/or disturbance of everyday activities; and/or

• by considering the change in ambient noise that will occur with the

development in operation.

Criteria which may be applicable for operational noise from the proposed

development, including road traffic noise are discussed below.

Technical Advice Note (TAN) 11

Technical Advice Note (TAN) 11(1) provides guidance to local authorities

on how the planning system can be used to minimise the adverse impact of

noise without placing unreasonable restrictions on development or adding

unduly to the costs and administrative burdens of business. It outlines

some of the main considerations which local planning authorities should

take into account when determining planning applications for development

which will either generate noise or be exposed to existing noise sources.

TAN 11 also makes reference to other guidance and criteria applicable for

different sources of noise such as industrial and commercial developments,

roads and railways.

TAN 11 states that BS 4142 (2) is the most appropriate methodology to

assess noise from industrial developments and from fixed plant associated

with the proposed developments.

British Standard BS 4142

The test that is generally applied to determining the level of noise of an

industrial nature likely to give rise to complaints from persons living in the

vicinity is given in British Standard BS 4142.

BS 4142 describes a method for determining industrial and background

noise levels outside residential buildings and for assessing whether the

industrial noise is likely to give rise to complaints from the occupants.

The BS 4142 assessment methodology involves the following procedure:

• the background (LA90) noise level (BNL) in the absence of the noise

source is measured outside the noise-sensitive receptor;

• the noise level from the source is then quantified, by prediction or

measurement, at a noise sensitive receptor as an LAeq (using the

procedures set out in the standard);

(1) Planning Guidance (Wales). Technical Advice Note 11, 1997. (2) British Standard BS 4142: 1997 'Method for Rating industrial noise affecting mixed residential and industrial areas'

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-5

• the noise level is corrected, if appropriate, for duration and character,

with the corrected noise level being termed the rating level and

expressed as an LAeq; and

• the rating level is then compared with the BNL (LA90) for the area.

The interpretation of the difference between the rating level and the BNL is

shown in Table 8.1 below.

Table 8.1 Interpretation of Noise Level Difference

Difference in Noise Level (dB) Significance

Around +10 Complaints are likely

Around +5 Marginal

More than – 10 Positive indication that complaints are unlikely

BS 4142 requires that daytime assessments are based on the highest LAeq

from the noise source over a period of 1 hour, while at night an assessment

period of 5 minutes is specified.

8.4.5 Road Traffic Noise

The proposed development may alter the traffic flows on the local

highways leading to changes in road traffic noise. The road traffic noise

assessment takes into consideration the following guidance as appropriate:

• DMRB (1) to identify where changes in road traffic will require a more

detailed assessment; and

• CRTN (2) to assess the actual change in road traffic noise as a result of

the project.

An increase in traffic flow of 25% (or reduction by 20%) is generally needed

to increase noise levels by 1 dB(A). A change of 1 dB(A) is only perceptible

in controlled conditions, and a change of 3 dB(A) is generally accepted as

the minimum perceptible under normal conditions. For heavy goods

vehicles an increase of around 5% is generally needed to increase noise

levels by 1 dB(A).

Flow changes of this size are not expected to give rise to perceptible noise

changes under normal listening conditions and have been adopted as the

scoping criterion for road traffic noise.

These standards apply to permanent noise changes and higher changes are

likely to be acceptable during construction.

(1) Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB). Volume 11, Section 3, Part 7 'Traffic Noise and Vibration'. 1994 (2) Department of Transport / Welsh Office Memorandum 'Calculation of Road Traffic Noise' (CRTN), 1998

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-6

8.4.6 Vibration Assessment Criteria

Human Exposure

The assessment of vibration follows the guidance set out in British

Standard BS 6472 (1). This standard provides a method to assess

disturbance from vibration.

The vibration dose value (VDV) levels, given in BS 6472 at or below which

the probability of ‘adverse comment’ is low are as follows:

• daytime (0700–2300 hours): 0.4 m/s1.75; and

• night-time (2300–0700 hours): 0.13 m/s1.75.

Building Damage Arising from Vibration

British Standard BS 7385 (part 2) (2) provides vibration criteria relating to

building damage and advice on acceptable levels of vibration in structures.

Limits for primarily transient vibration (eg from piling works or train pass-

by) above which cosmetic damage could occur are as follows:

• reinforced or framed buildings: 50 mm/s PPV; or

• un-reinforced or light framed buildings: 15 mm/s PPV.

8.5 BASELINE CONDITIONS

8.5.1 Noise Sensitive Receptors

The site of the proposed CCGT power plant development is located to the

north west of the Baglan Bay Energy Park and adjacent to the existing GE

power station. The village of Baglan is located on a hill to the north east of

the M4 motorway, overlooking the site. The A48 and M4 separate the site

and the village of Baglan. A full description of the development is given in

Chapter 2. The site location, NSRs and noise measurement locations are

illustrated in Figure 8.1.

A description of the NSRs and noise measurement locations are given

below.

• Location 1: Brahams Avenue. Representative of residential properties

in Sandfields to the south of the site, approximately 465 m from the

closest site boundary.

(1) BS 6472: 1992 'Guide to Evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz). (2) BS 7385-2: 1993 ‘Evaluation and measurement for vibration in buildings – Part 2: Guide to damage levels from

groundborne vibration’.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-7

• Location 2: Affendale. Representative of a recent residential

development situated between Sandfields and Baglan Moors to the

south of the site, approximately 610 m from the closest site boundary.

• Location 3: Church Street. Representative of properties in Briton Ferry

and Llansawel to the north east of the site, approximately 320 m from

the closest site boundary (re-routed pipe), and 1495 m from the main

works (CCGT plant). There is also a travellers’ site at this location

which may experience potential noise impacts associated with the

construction of the water works and re-routing of the water pipe.

• Location 4: Sunny Mount. Representative of properties to the east of

the site, located on the far side of the M4 motorway, approximately

1120 m from the closest site boundary.

8.5.2 Baseline Noise Environment

Measurements were taken in accordance with BS 4142 using a Type 1

sound level meter placed on a tripod at a height of 1.5m, and calibrated

prior to use. No significant (± 0.5dB) calibration drift was noted.

The surveys were undertaken during the weekends of May 25th and June

2nd, 2007. Full details of the survey and a glossary of acoustic terms are

included in Annex B.

Ambient noise levels at each location were found to vary, and in general

the lowest ambient levels recorded in each time period are used in the

assessment. A summary of the measured baseline noise levels are

presented in Table 8.2 below.

Table 8.2 Summary of Measured Baseline Noise Levels (free-field), dB

Sound Pressure Level (dB) Measurement

Location (See

Figure 8.1) Daytime (1)

LAeq, 10 mins Night-time (2)

LAeq, 10 mins

LAmax, range of 10 min

samples

1 - Brahams Avenue 56 46 69-83

2 – Affendale 51 44 69-80

3 - Church Street 55 47 68-79

4 - Sunny Mount 54 47 72-87

Ambient noise at Brahams Avenue and Affendale consisted of road traffic

noise from local roads, the A48 and M4, and operational noise from the GE

power station. Ambient noise at Church Street and Sunny Mount was

dominated by road traffic noise from the A48 and the M4 along with

operational noise from the GE power station, perceptible during gaps in the

traffic.

(1) Daytime is defined as 0700 – 2300 hours (2) Night time is defined as 2300 - 0700 hours

!(

!(

!(

!(3

4

12

CLIENT: SIZE: TITLE:

DATE: 29/05/2008

DRAWN: CO

CHECKED: SD

APPROVED: SD

PROJECT: 0064142

SCALE: As Scale BarDRAWING: REV:

KEY:APCL A4 Figure 8.1

Noise Monitoring Locations

Noise.mxd 1SOURCE: Reproduced from Ordnance Survey digital map data. © Crowncopyright, All rights reserved. 2008 License number 0100031673.PROJECTION: British National Grid

File:

0064

142B

aglan

BayG

IS\m

xds\N

ewBo

unda

ry_ES

\Nois

e.mxd

ERMLlandarcy House11A The CourtyardLlandarcySwansea Bay, SA10 6EJTel: 01792 814907Fax: 01792 817396.

0 450

Metres

!( Monitoring LocationsRed Line Boundary

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-9

8.6 POTENTIAL NOISE IMPACTS

8.6.1 Predicted Construction Noise Levels

Construction noise will arise from on-site construction and from plant and

vehicles on the site and on local roads.

The anticipated level of construction noise during each phase of the project

will vary depending on the activity taking place, distance between the

works and NSR and any local noise screening or ground attenuation

effects. There will be a range of noise emissions during the works, from

particularly noisy (but usually short-term) activities such as piling and

foundation works to relatively quiet works, such as the final fit-out and

completion of buildings where heavy machinery is not usually required

and some works can be carried out within the building.

Detailed construction plant information is unavailable at this stage.

However, in the absence of this information, generic plant levels from

comparable developments have been used to assess potential construction

noise impacts.

The noisiest construction phases are assessed as follows:

1. Site preparation including earthworks estimated duration 6 months, to

commence in Summer/Autumn 2011, with a total equivalent sound

pressure level of LAeq 89 dB at 10m. Noise from the site preparation

phase of the works will be experienced at all NSRs.

2. Foundation works estimated duration 6 months, to commence in

autumn 2011 with a total equivalent sound pressure level of LAeq 88 dB

at 10m. Noise from foundation works phase of the works will be

experienced at all NSRs.

3. Piling activities associated with the water works and pipeline estimated

duration 3 months, with a total equivalent sound pressure level of LAeq

88 dB at 10m. Sheet piling phase will be necessary in the vicinity of all

NSRs, and particularly those at Church Street for works associated with

the water works / pipeline re-routing.

4. Building and structural works for Stage 1 of construction (estimated

duration 30 months) will commence in spring 2011, with a total

equivalent sound pressure level of LAeq 85 dB at 10m. An 18 month

construction period will follow during 2015/2016 to complete Stage 2.

Noise from the building and structural phase of the works will be

experienced at all NSRs.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-10

Noise level data for typical construction activities associated with each of

the four work phases outlined above were obtained from a database (1) and

from experience of similar projects. These levels form the basis of the

construction noise impact assessment.

Predicted construction noise levels are presented in Table 8.3. They are

based on the distance between the nearest receptor and the closest site

boundary without mitigation. The calculations have also assumed that

sheet piling will take place at the water works and pipeline re-routing in

proximity of Church Street. These are conservative assumptions, and the

predicted construction noise levels will be over-estimated. This scenario

therefore presents the worst-case construction noise levels.

Table 8.3 Worst Case Construction Noise Levels (without Mitigation)

Indicative construction noise levels, façade

LAeq, T (dB)

Receptor

(See

Figure 8.1)

Approx.

distance to

nearest site

boundary (m)

Site

preparation

Foundation

works

Piling Building

structural

works

Construction

Noise

Criterion

Level, dB

Significance

of Impact

1. Brahms

Avenue

530 55 53 54 51 75 None

2. Affendale 625 53 52 52 49 75 None

3. Church

Street

320 59 44 58 42 75 None

4. Sunny

Mount

1120 48 47 47 44 75 None

These indicative noise levels at the receptors are based on construction

works taking place at the closest work site boundary. These situations are

likely to occur only for short periods of time in each instance, and in most

cases, the works will be at a greater distance than those indicated.

Although the calculated noise levels are for the worst-case construction

activity, the predicted construction noise levels fall well below the daytime

noise criterion. In two of the four locations the existing daytime noise

levels (reported in Table 8.2) are greater than the predicted worst-case

construction noise levels.

The traveller’s site situated adjacent to Church Street will not be subject to

significant noise impacts from the construction operations associated with

works to the water pipe. However piling, and other works may be audible.

8.6.2 Construction Traffic

Chapter 5 (Traffic and Transport) identifies that movements of private

vehicles associated with the construction workers will give rise to a

(1) DEFRA (2005) 'Update of Noise Database for Prediction of Noise on Construction and Open Sites'.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-11

substantial percentage increases in the peak month during the early

morning (0600 – 0700) and evening (1900 – 2000) periods only.

This will result in a temporary noise impact from personnel vehicles on

residents living alongside the A48 in Baglan during these hours, and

during the peak month of the 30 month Stage 1 construction period only (ie

month 20).

However, these increases appear when the road network will be

substantially under capacity.

During the peak month, there will be up to 90 HGV movements per day

between 0700 and 1900. At all times outside of the peak construction

month the generated HGV traffic is expected to be less than 90 per day.

This is not considered significant, and no construction traffic noise impacts

from HGVs are expected.

Mitigation measures for road traffic noise are discussed in Chapter 5 (Traffic

and Transport).

8.6.3 Commissioning Noise

During commissioning there will be short periods between the hours of

09:00hrs and 17:30hrs when pipelines will be subjected to purging flows

and safety valves tested. These operations are short-term in duration, but

can cause high levels of noise. Residents will be informed a number of

days before the event. The timing of these events are difficult to forecast

however it is anticipated that the steam blowing activities will take place

occasionally and will last only a few hours at a time. Commissioning is due

to take place for Stage 1, autumn 2013 and for Stage 2 in autumn 2016.

8.6.4 Operational Noise

Operational noise will occur as a result of the operation of plant and from

road traffic associated with the project. At this stage, detailed plant

specification is unavailable to predict operational noise levels at the nearest

NSRs.

However, in the absence of predicted noise levels, and following

consultation with NPTCBC, a suitable noise design criterion for the

proposed development has been established by utilising the methodology

outlined in BS 4142.

BS 4142 indicates that where the predicted noise level is 10 dB greater than

the background level, then this is a positive indication that ‘complaints are

likely’. An increase of around 5 dB is of ‘marginal significance’, and a

predicted level of 10 dB less than the background noise level is a positive

indication that ‘complaints are unlikely’.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-12

BS 4142 also suggests that a penalty of 5 dB should be applied when rating

the likelihood of complaints from a noise source that has discrete tonal,

impulsive or irregular character.

The operation of the plant will largely be a continuous process, with

numerous sources of noise including fans and cooling equipment which

may generate tonal noise. A character penalty of 5 dB has therefore been

included to the plant noise in determining the rating level specified in

BS4142.

In the absence of source data to calculate operational noise emissions, a

noise design criterion is established for total noise emission of plant

associated with the project. This is so that it does not exceed the BS 4142

target level set for each of the four NSRs identified in Figure 8.1. By

ensuring that the plant noise level is no higher than the minimum

background LA90 noise level at a given receptor, it would avoid the rating

level exceeding the background noise by more than 5 dB(A), which in turn

avoids a noise level of more than ‘marginal significance’ according to BS

4142.

The BS 4142 target level at each receptor is given in Table 8.4 below and is

applicable for night-time, which is the most sensitive time period.

Table 8.4 Summary of Operational Noise Criteria (Night Time)

Night-time Minimum Baseline

Noise Level

Target Level at the

receptor

Receptor

(See Figure 8.1)

Distance to

closest site

boundary (m)

LAeq,period (dB) LA90,period (dB) LAeq,5-min (dB)

1. Brahms Avenue 530 56 46 46

2. Affendale 625 51 44 44

3. Church Street 320(1) 55 47 47

4. Sunny Mount 1120 54 47 47

(1) Church Street is 320 m from the water works/pipeline route, but 1495 m from the main

development.

Compliance with the above criteria will ensure that significant operational

impacts are avoided.

8.6.5 Operational Traffic

Chapter 5 (Traffic and Transport) reports a maximum of 80 movements over a

24 hour period to and from the site. Throughout the operational period

there will be negligible numbers of HGVs accessing the site. Such changes

are not significant compared to the baseline traffic flow, and no operational

traffic noise impacts are expected.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-13

8.7 POTENTIAL VIBRATION IMPACTS

8.7.1 Vibration during Construction

Measurements of vibration from construction plant have shown that, even

from percussive piling equipment, levels typically fall to imperceptibility

beyond approximately 100 m from the vibration source. Imperceptible

levels are reached at much smaller distances from other sources of

vibration, such as construction plant. There are no NSRs within 100 m of

potential sources of vibration associated with construction works. No

significant construction vibration impacts are expected.

8.7.2 Vibration during Operation

The design of the power station will ensure that vibration will be

imperceptible beyond the site boundary. No significant vibration impacts

are expected to occur during operation.

8.8 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS

Potential cumulative impacts from this development may arise from the

operation of the project.

The baseline noise measurements have taken account of noise from the

existing power station, and the operational noise levels of the proposed

power station outlined in Table 8.4 will ensure that there will be a non

significant increase in operational noise.

Cumulative impacts from road traffic noise (personnel vehicles) may occur

during the peak month of the construction only.

8.9 MITIGATION

8.9.1 Construction

Construction works are expected to be undertaken during daytime hours.

However, there may be occasions, for example delivery of abnormal loads,

which may require evening or night-time construction.

Should this be necessary, the mitigation measures below will be included in

a Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) adopted by the project to control

noise impacts. The CoCP will be implemented during the works and take

account of the following:

• the proper use of such plant with respect to minimising noise emissions;

• the proper maintenance of plant, including plant housings and silencers;

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-14

• the selection of inherently quiet plant, and use of enclosures and screens

around noisy fixed plant. Site hoardings can also provide some benefit

from acoustic screening provided they are of suitable construction and

properly installed;

• placing noisy plant as far as possible from sensitive receptors;

• informing neighbouring building occupants and the local

Environmental Health Department when particularly noisy operations

are planned; and

• identifying a Baglan Bay Energy Park Project site liaison officer to deal

with noise and other environmental matters.

Furthermore, the Contractor will adhere to the codes of practice for

construction working and piling outlined in BS 5228 parts 1 and 4. This

advice will be incorporated within the CoCP for minimising noise

emissions from the site.

8.9.2 Operation

During operation, mitigation measures will include the following noise

control methods:

• Selection of quiet equipment and engineering solutions to reduce noise

at source and improve the sound insulation of buildings and enclosures

housing noisy equipment to ensure that operational noise achieves the

levels outlined in Table 8.4.

• Ensuring the proposed power plant site layout is optimised to provide

adequate distance between particular sources of noise and noise

sensitive buildings or areas and from using screening by natural and

engineered barriers and other buildings, as necessary.

With regard to engineering solutions, significant attenuation can be

achieved through established noise control packages, and given the

separation of the plant from NSRs, screening and other factors, it is

expected that the BS 4142 target levels outlined in Table 8.4 can be met.

8.10 CONCLUSIONS AND SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL IMPACTS

No significant residual impacts for the construction and operation of the

development are expected as these can be mitigated through design and

planning conditions as appropriate.

A temporary residual noise impact as a result of road traffic noise from

personnel vehicles associated with the construction of the scheme is

expected on residents living alongside the A48. This will only occur in the

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT

8-15

hours when construction personnel will be travelling to and from site,

during the peak month of the 30 month Stage 1 construction period.

During commissioning there will be short periods between the hours of

09:00hrs and 17:30hrs when pipelines will be subjected to purging flows

and safety valves tested. These operations are short-term in duration, but

can cause high levels of noise and therefore result in temporary residual

noise impacts. These activities will take place occasionally and will last

only a few hours at a time.

No significant construction or operational vibration impacts are expected.

A summary of all impacts and mitigation measures is detailed in Table 8.5

below.

Table 8.5 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation

Impact Type Key Potential Impacts

(without mitigation)

Mitigation Residual Impact Means by which

mitigation will be

delivered

Noise and

Vibration

Impacts on noise sensitive

receptors resulting from

construction.

Construction works are expected to be undertaken during daytime hours.

However, there may be occasions, for example delivery of abnormal loads,

which may require evening or night-time construction

Should this be necessary, the mitigation measures below will be included

in a Construction HSSE Plan adopted by the project to control noise

impacts. The HSSE Plan will be implemented during the works and take

account of the following:

No significant residual

impacts predicted.

CoCP

the proper use of such plant with respect to minimising noise emissions; No significant residual

impacts predicted.

CoCP

the proper maintenance of plant, including plant housings and silencers; No significant residual

impacts predicted.

CoCP

the selection of inherently quiet plant, and use of enclosures and screens

around noisy fixed plant. Site hoardings can also provide some benefit

from acoustic screening provided they are of suitable construction and

properly installed;

No significant residual

impacts predicted.

CoCP

placing noisy plant as far as possible from sensitive receptors;

No significant residual

impacts predicted.

CoCP

Impact Type Key Potential Impacts

(without mitigation)

Mitigation Residual Impact Means by which

mitigation will be

delivered

informing neighbouring building occupants and the local Environmental

Health Department when particularly noisy operations are planned; and

No significant residual

impacts predicted.

CoCP

identifying a Baglan Bay Energy Park Project site liaison officer to deal

with noise and other environmental matters.

No significant residual

impacts predicted.

CoCP

The Contractor will adhere to the codes of practice for construction

working and piling outlined in BS 5228 parts 1 and 4. This advice will be

incorporated within the HSSE Plan for minimising noise emissions from

the site.

No significant residual

impacts predicted.

CoCP

Noise and

Vibration

Impacts on noise sensitive

receptors resulting from

Operation

Selection of quiet equipment and engineering solutions to reduce noise at

source and improve the sound insulation of buildings and enclosures

housing noisy equipment and operations, including design measures to

ensure that operational noise meets the levels outlined in Table 8.4.

No significant residual

impacts predicted.

CoCP

Ensuring the proposed CCGT power station site layout is optimised to

provide adequate distance between particular sources of noise and noise

sensitive buildings or areas and from using screening by natural and

engineered barriers and other buildings, as necessary.

No significant residual

impacts predicted

CoCP

With regard to engineering solutions, significant attenuation can be

achieved through established noise control packages, and given the

separation of the plant from NSRs, screening and other factors, it is

expected that the BS 4142 target levels outlined in Table 8.4 can be met.

No significant residual

impacts predicted

CoCP

Impact Type Key Potential Impacts

(without mitigation)

Mitigation Residual Impact Means by which

mitigation will be

delivered

Noise and

Vibration

Impacts on noise sensitive

receptors resulting from

Construction Traffic

Wherever practical, deliveries of abnormal loads will be made outside of

peak hours and where appropriate during the night.

Temporary residual noise

impact expected for the peak

month of construction.

CoCP

Construction vehicles will abide by the identified construction route. Temporary residual noise

impact expected for the peak

month of construction.

CoCP

Materials and equipment will be stored securely on site to minimise

unnecessary traffic movements.

Temporary residual noise

impact expected for the peak

month of construction.

CoCP


Recommended