ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-1
8 NOISE AND VIBRATION
8.1 SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL IMPACTS
No significant residual impacts for the construction and operation of the
proposed CCGT power plant development are expected as these will be
mitigated through design and planning conditions as appropriate.
A temporary residual noise impact as a result of road traffic noise from
personnel vehicles associated with the construction of the scheme is
expected on residents living alongside the A48. This will only occur in the
hours when construction personnel will be travelling to and from site,
during the peak month of the 30 month Stage 1 construction period.
During commissioning there will be short periods between the hours of
09:00hrs and 17:30hrs when pipelines will be subjected to purging flows
and safety valves tested. These operations are short-term in duration, but
can cause high levels of noise and therefore result in temporary residual
noise impacts. These activities will take place occasionally and will last
only a few hours at a time.
No significant construction or operational vibration impacts are expected.
8.2 INTRODUCTION
This chapter considers the potential for noise and vibration impacts
associated with the construction and operation of the proposed power
station at the Baglan Bay Energy Park. The site is adjacent to the GE power
station and the M4 motorway. The proposed scheme will introduce a new
and permanent source of noise in the area.
8.3 LEGISLATION AND POLICY REVIEW
The aim of noise policy within Wales is to protect individuals from
excessive noise levels both in the workplace and when at home. It has been
recognised that noise can cause annoyance and can lead to sleep
disturbance and potentially other adverse health effects. Legislation has
aimed to address this. Regulations, mainly at EU level, have set maximum
sound levels for vehicles, aeroplanes and machines. More recently the
European Commission has requested mapping of noise levels and the
development of Action Plans to address noise problems where necessary,
including preservation of quiet areas. At national level, the Department of
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) has been developing an
Ambient Noise Strategy giving policy guidance on transportation and
industrial noise. Planning Guidance (TAN 11) has also been important in
promoting ways of reducing noise problems in the future. Some local
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-2
authorities also produce their own local planning guidance as part of their
development plans. Relevant policies are discussed in greater detail in
Section 8.4 below.
8.4 ASSESSMENT SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY
8.4.1 Introduction
The approach to this assessment has been discussed and agreed in
consultation with Neath and Port Talbot County Borough Council. The
scope of this assessment, and the assessment methodology and criteria are
discussed below.
8.4.2 Scope of Assessment
The assessment included the following tasks:
• defining noise sensitive receptors (NSRs) in consultation with NPTCBC;
• defining the baseline noise environment by measurement at
representative NSRs;
• assessing construction noise and vibration impacts at representative
NSRs;
• assessing road traffic noise impacts from construction and operation;
and
• defining acceptable operational noise and vibration levels for the
proposed development.
8.4.3 Construction Assessment Methodology and Criteria
Advice and guidelines to local planning authorities and developers on
construction noise in the UK can be found in British Standard BS 5228 (1)
and Advisory Leaflet (AL) 72 (2). AL 72 is out of print, but remains as a
paper giving guidance on acceptable levels of construction noise.
BS 5228 Part 1 does not specify suitable daytime noise levels from
construction sites, but lists a number of factors that might affect the
acceptability of noise and vibration from construction sites. These factors
are:
(1) British Standard BS 5228: 1997 ‘Noise control on construction and open sites’. BSI. 1997. (2) Advisory Leaflet 72. ‘Noise control on building sites’. Department of the Environment. 1976.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-3
• site location;
• existing ambient noise levels;
• duration of site operations;
• hours of work;
• attitude to site operator; and
• noise and vibration characteristics of the work.
Although BS 5228 does not propose noise standards for daytime periods, it
suggests that acceptable noise levels in the evening (1900 - 2200 hours) may
need to be 10 dB(A) lower than daytime levels. AL 72 gives advice on
preferred maximum levels of construction site noise at residential locations
during daytime hours (0700 – 1900 hours). Since the criterion of speech
interference forms the basis of the recommendations within AL 72, they can
be taken as applicable to commercial buildings as well as residential
properties. The leaflet states that the noise level outside the nearest
occupied room should not exceed:
• 75 dB(A) in urban areas near to main roads in heavy industrial areas; or
• 70 dB(A) in rural, suburban and urban areas away from main road
traffic and industrial noise.
These levels are generally taken as being facade LAeq, period (1) and will be
used to assess potential construction noise impacts.
Local authorities have powers under the Control of Pollution Act 1974 to
control noise from construction sites. These powers do not refer to fixed
noise limits but instead allow for the enforcement of ‘best practicable
means’ (2) to reduce or counteract the effects of the noise.
It is assumed that the construction work will take place over a five day
working week, with the maximum working hours of 0700 to 1900 hours.
A Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) will set working hours and noise
control measures, and will be agreed with NPTCBC prior to construction
work commencing.
8.4.4 Operational Noise Assessment Methodology and Criteria
Overview
Noise from developments is assessed in two ways:
• by comparing the predicted level of noise from the development
against absolute noise standards, such as those that indicate likely
(1) LAeq is defined as the notional steady sound level which, over a stated period of time, would contain the same
amount of acoustical energy as the A-weighted fluctuating sound measured over that period. (2) Defined in Section 72 of the Control of Pollution Act 1974.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-4
annoyance and/or disturbance of everyday activities; and/or
• by considering the change in ambient noise that will occur with the
development in operation.
Criteria which may be applicable for operational noise from the proposed
development, including road traffic noise are discussed below.
Technical Advice Note (TAN) 11
Technical Advice Note (TAN) 11(1) provides guidance to local authorities
on how the planning system can be used to minimise the adverse impact of
noise without placing unreasonable restrictions on development or adding
unduly to the costs and administrative burdens of business. It outlines
some of the main considerations which local planning authorities should
take into account when determining planning applications for development
which will either generate noise or be exposed to existing noise sources.
TAN 11 also makes reference to other guidance and criteria applicable for
different sources of noise such as industrial and commercial developments,
roads and railways.
TAN 11 states that BS 4142 (2) is the most appropriate methodology to
assess noise from industrial developments and from fixed plant associated
with the proposed developments.
British Standard BS 4142
The test that is generally applied to determining the level of noise of an
industrial nature likely to give rise to complaints from persons living in the
vicinity is given in British Standard BS 4142.
BS 4142 describes a method for determining industrial and background
noise levels outside residential buildings and for assessing whether the
industrial noise is likely to give rise to complaints from the occupants.
The BS 4142 assessment methodology involves the following procedure:
• the background (LA90) noise level (BNL) in the absence of the noise
source is measured outside the noise-sensitive receptor;
• the noise level from the source is then quantified, by prediction or
measurement, at a noise sensitive receptor as an LAeq (using the
procedures set out in the standard);
(1) Planning Guidance (Wales). Technical Advice Note 11, 1997. (2) British Standard BS 4142: 1997 'Method for Rating industrial noise affecting mixed residential and industrial areas'
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-5
• the noise level is corrected, if appropriate, for duration and character,
with the corrected noise level being termed the rating level and
expressed as an LAeq; and
• the rating level is then compared with the BNL (LA90) for the area.
The interpretation of the difference between the rating level and the BNL is
shown in Table 8.1 below.
Table 8.1 Interpretation of Noise Level Difference
Difference in Noise Level (dB) Significance
Around +10 Complaints are likely
Around +5 Marginal
More than – 10 Positive indication that complaints are unlikely
BS 4142 requires that daytime assessments are based on the highest LAeq
from the noise source over a period of 1 hour, while at night an assessment
period of 5 minutes is specified.
8.4.5 Road Traffic Noise
The proposed development may alter the traffic flows on the local
highways leading to changes in road traffic noise. The road traffic noise
assessment takes into consideration the following guidance as appropriate:
• DMRB (1) to identify where changes in road traffic will require a more
detailed assessment; and
• CRTN (2) to assess the actual change in road traffic noise as a result of
the project.
An increase in traffic flow of 25% (or reduction by 20%) is generally needed
to increase noise levels by 1 dB(A). A change of 1 dB(A) is only perceptible
in controlled conditions, and a change of 3 dB(A) is generally accepted as
the minimum perceptible under normal conditions. For heavy goods
vehicles an increase of around 5% is generally needed to increase noise
levels by 1 dB(A).
Flow changes of this size are not expected to give rise to perceptible noise
changes under normal listening conditions and have been adopted as the
scoping criterion for road traffic noise.
These standards apply to permanent noise changes and higher changes are
likely to be acceptable during construction.
(1) Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB). Volume 11, Section 3, Part 7 'Traffic Noise and Vibration'. 1994 (2) Department of Transport / Welsh Office Memorandum 'Calculation of Road Traffic Noise' (CRTN), 1998
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-6
8.4.6 Vibration Assessment Criteria
Human Exposure
The assessment of vibration follows the guidance set out in British
Standard BS 6472 (1). This standard provides a method to assess
disturbance from vibration.
The vibration dose value (VDV) levels, given in BS 6472 at or below which
the probability of ‘adverse comment’ is low are as follows:
• daytime (0700–2300 hours): 0.4 m/s1.75; and
• night-time (2300–0700 hours): 0.13 m/s1.75.
Building Damage Arising from Vibration
British Standard BS 7385 (part 2) (2) provides vibration criteria relating to
building damage and advice on acceptable levels of vibration in structures.
Limits for primarily transient vibration (eg from piling works or train pass-
by) above which cosmetic damage could occur are as follows:
• reinforced or framed buildings: 50 mm/s PPV; or
• un-reinforced or light framed buildings: 15 mm/s PPV.
8.5 BASELINE CONDITIONS
8.5.1 Noise Sensitive Receptors
The site of the proposed CCGT power plant development is located to the
north west of the Baglan Bay Energy Park and adjacent to the existing GE
power station. The village of Baglan is located on a hill to the north east of
the M4 motorway, overlooking the site. The A48 and M4 separate the site
and the village of Baglan. A full description of the development is given in
Chapter 2. The site location, NSRs and noise measurement locations are
illustrated in Figure 8.1.
A description of the NSRs and noise measurement locations are given
below.
• Location 1: Brahams Avenue. Representative of residential properties
in Sandfields to the south of the site, approximately 465 m from the
closest site boundary.
(1) BS 6472: 1992 'Guide to Evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz). (2) BS 7385-2: 1993 ‘Evaluation and measurement for vibration in buildings – Part 2: Guide to damage levels from
groundborne vibration’.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-7
• Location 2: Affendale. Representative of a recent residential
development situated between Sandfields and Baglan Moors to the
south of the site, approximately 610 m from the closest site boundary.
• Location 3: Church Street. Representative of properties in Briton Ferry
and Llansawel to the north east of the site, approximately 320 m from
the closest site boundary (re-routed pipe), and 1495 m from the main
works (CCGT plant). There is also a travellers’ site at this location
which may experience potential noise impacts associated with the
construction of the water works and re-routing of the water pipe.
• Location 4: Sunny Mount. Representative of properties to the east of
the site, located on the far side of the M4 motorway, approximately
1120 m from the closest site boundary.
8.5.2 Baseline Noise Environment
Measurements were taken in accordance with BS 4142 using a Type 1
sound level meter placed on a tripod at a height of 1.5m, and calibrated
prior to use. No significant (± 0.5dB) calibration drift was noted.
The surveys were undertaken during the weekends of May 25th and June
2nd, 2007. Full details of the survey and a glossary of acoustic terms are
included in Annex B.
Ambient noise levels at each location were found to vary, and in general
the lowest ambient levels recorded in each time period are used in the
assessment. A summary of the measured baseline noise levels are
presented in Table 8.2 below.
Table 8.2 Summary of Measured Baseline Noise Levels (free-field), dB
Sound Pressure Level (dB) Measurement
Location (See
Figure 8.1) Daytime (1)
LAeq, 10 mins Night-time (2)
LAeq, 10 mins
LAmax, range of 10 min
samples
1 - Brahams Avenue 56 46 69-83
2 – Affendale 51 44 69-80
3 - Church Street 55 47 68-79
4 - Sunny Mount 54 47 72-87
Ambient noise at Brahams Avenue and Affendale consisted of road traffic
noise from local roads, the A48 and M4, and operational noise from the GE
power station. Ambient noise at Church Street and Sunny Mount was
dominated by road traffic noise from the A48 and the M4 along with
operational noise from the GE power station, perceptible during gaps in the
traffic.
(1) Daytime is defined as 0700 – 2300 hours (2) Night time is defined as 2300 - 0700 hours
!(
!(
!(
!(3
4
12
CLIENT: SIZE: TITLE:
DATE: 29/05/2008
DRAWN: CO
CHECKED: SD
APPROVED: SD
PROJECT: 0064142
SCALE: As Scale BarDRAWING: REV:
KEY:APCL A4 Figure 8.1
Noise Monitoring Locations
Noise.mxd 1SOURCE: Reproduced from Ordnance Survey digital map data. © Crowncopyright, All rights reserved. 2008 License number 0100031673.PROJECTION: British National Grid
File:
0064
142B
aglan
BayG
IS\m
xds\N
ewBo
unda
ry_ES
\Nois
e.mxd
ERMLlandarcy House11A The CourtyardLlandarcySwansea Bay, SA10 6EJTel: 01792 814907Fax: 01792 817396.
0 450
Metres
!( Monitoring LocationsRed Line Boundary
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-9
8.6 POTENTIAL NOISE IMPACTS
8.6.1 Predicted Construction Noise Levels
Construction noise will arise from on-site construction and from plant and
vehicles on the site and on local roads.
The anticipated level of construction noise during each phase of the project
will vary depending on the activity taking place, distance between the
works and NSR and any local noise screening or ground attenuation
effects. There will be a range of noise emissions during the works, from
particularly noisy (but usually short-term) activities such as piling and
foundation works to relatively quiet works, such as the final fit-out and
completion of buildings where heavy machinery is not usually required
and some works can be carried out within the building.
Detailed construction plant information is unavailable at this stage.
However, in the absence of this information, generic plant levels from
comparable developments have been used to assess potential construction
noise impacts.
The noisiest construction phases are assessed as follows:
1. Site preparation including earthworks estimated duration 6 months, to
commence in Summer/Autumn 2011, with a total equivalent sound
pressure level of LAeq 89 dB at 10m. Noise from the site preparation
phase of the works will be experienced at all NSRs.
2. Foundation works estimated duration 6 months, to commence in
autumn 2011 with a total equivalent sound pressure level of LAeq 88 dB
at 10m. Noise from foundation works phase of the works will be
experienced at all NSRs.
3. Piling activities associated with the water works and pipeline estimated
duration 3 months, with a total equivalent sound pressure level of LAeq
88 dB at 10m. Sheet piling phase will be necessary in the vicinity of all
NSRs, and particularly those at Church Street for works associated with
the water works / pipeline re-routing.
4. Building and structural works for Stage 1 of construction (estimated
duration 30 months) will commence in spring 2011, with a total
equivalent sound pressure level of LAeq 85 dB at 10m. An 18 month
construction period will follow during 2015/2016 to complete Stage 2.
Noise from the building and structural phase of the works will be
experienced at all NSRs.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-10
Noise level data for typical construction activities associated with each of
the four work phases outlined above were obtained from a database (1) and
from experience of similar projects. These levels form the basis of the
construction noise impact assessment.
Predicted construction noise levels are presented in Table 8.3. They are
based on the distance between the nearest receptor and the closest site
boundary without mitigation. The calculations have also assumed that
sheet piling will take place at the water works and pipeline re-routing in
proximity of Church Street. These are conservative assumptions, and the
predicted construction noise levels will be over-estimated. This scenario
therefore presents the worst-case construction noise levels.
Table 8.3 Worst Case Construction Noise Levels (without Mitigation)
Indicative construction noise levels, façade
LAeq, T (dB)
Receptor
(See
Figure 8.1)
Approx.
distance to
nearest site
boundary (m)
Site
preparation
Foundation
works
Piling Building
structural
works
Construction
Noise
Criterion
Level, dB
Significance
of Impact
1. Brahms
Avenue
530 55 53 54 51 75 None
2. Affendale 625 53 52 52 49 75 None
3. Church
Street
320 59 44 58 42 75 None
4. Sunny
Mount
1120 48 47 47 44 75 None
These indicative noise levels at the receptors are based on construction
works taking place at the closest work site boundary. These situations are
likely to occur only for short periods of time in each instance, and in most
cases, the works will be at a greater distance than those indicated.
Although the calculated noise levels are for the worst-case construction
activity, the predicted construction noise levels fall well below the daytime
noise criterion. In two of the four locations the existing daytime noise
levels (reported in Table 8.2) are greater than the predicted worst-case
construction noise levels.
The traveller’s site situated adjacent to Church Street will not be subject to
significant noise impacts from the construction operations associated with
works to the water pipe. However piling, and other works may be audible.
8.6.2 Construction Traffic
Chapter 5 (Traffic and Transport) identifies that movements of private
vehicles associated with the construction workers will give rise to a
(1) DEFRA (2005) 'Update of Noise Database for Prediction of Noise on Construction and Open Sites'.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-11
substantial percentage increases in the peak month during the early
morning (0600 – 0700) and evening (1900 – 2000) periods only.
This will result in a temporary noise impact from personnel vehicles on
residents living alongside the A48 in Baglan during these hours, and
during the peak month of the 30 month Stage 1 construction period only (ie
month 20).
However, these increases appear when the road network will be
substantially under capacity.
During the peak month, there will be up to 90 HGV movements per day
between 0700 and 1900. At all times outside of the peak construction
month the generated HGV traffic is expected to be less than 90 per day.
This is not considered significant, and no construction traffic noise impacts
from HGVs are expected.
Mitigation measures for road traffic noise are discussed in Chapter 5 (Traffic
and Transport).
8.6.3 Commissioning Noise
During commissioning there will be short periods between the hours of
09:00hrs and 17:30hrs when pipelines will be subjected to purging flows
and safety valves tested. These operations are short-term in duration, but
can cause high levels of noise. Residents will be informed a number of
days before the event. The timing of these events are difficult to forecast
however it is anticipated that the steam blowing activities will take place
occasionally and will last only a few hours at a time. Commissioning is due
to take place for Stage 1, autumn 2013 and for Stage 2 in autumn 2016.
8.6.4 Operational Noise
Operational noise will occur as a result of the operation of plant and from
road traffic associated with the project. At this stage, detailed plant
specification is unavailable to predict operational noise levels at the nearest
NSRs.
However, in the absence of predicted noise levels, and following
consultation with NPTCBC, a suitable noise design criterion for the
proposed development has been established by utilising the methodology
outlined in BS 4142.
BS 4142 indicates that where the predicted noise level is 10 dB greater than
the background level, then this is a positive indication that ‘complaints are
likely’. An increase of around 5 dB is of ‘marginal significance’, and a
predicted level of 10 dB less than the background noise level is a positive
indication that ‘complaints are unlikely’.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-12
BS 4142 also suggests that a penalty of 5 dB should be applied when rating
the likelihood of complaints from a noise source that has discrete tonal,
impulsive or irregular character.
The operation of the plant will largely be a continuous process, with
numerous sources of noise including fans and cooling equipment which
may generate tonal noise. A character penalty of 5 dB has therefore been
included to the plant noise in determining the rating level specified in
BS4142.
In the absence of source data to calculate operational noise emissions, a
noise design criterion is established for total noise emission of plant
associated with the project. This is so that it does not exceed the BS 4142
target level set for each of the four NSRs identified in Figure 8.1. By
ensuring that the plant noise level is no higher than the minimum
background LA90 noise level at a given receptor, it would avoid the rating
level exceeding the background noise by more than 5 dB(A), which in turn
avoids a noise level of more than ‘marginal significance’ according to BS
4142.
The BS 4142 target level at each receptor is given in Table 8.4 below and is
applicable for night-time, which is the most sensitive time period.
Table 8.4 Summary of Operational Noise Criteria (Night Time)
Night-time Minimum Baseline
Noise Level
Target Level at the
receptor
Receptor
(See Figure 8.1)
Distance to
closest site
boundary (m)
LAeq,period (dB) LA90,period (dB) LAeq,5-min (dB)
1. Brahms Avenue 530 56 46 46
2. Affendale 625 51 44 44
3. Church Street 320(1) 55 47 47
4. Sunny Mount 1120 54 47 47
(1) Church Street is 320 m from the water works/pipeline route, but 1495 m from the main
development.
Compliance with the above criteria will ensure that significant operational
impacts are avoided.
8.6.5 Operational Traffic
Chapter 5 (Traffic and Transport) reports a maximum of 80 movements over a
24 hour period to and from the site. Throughout the operational period
there will be negligible numbers of HGVs accessing the site. Such changes
are not significant compared to the baseline traffic flow, and no operational
traffic noise impacts are expected.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-13
8.7 POTENTIAL VIBRATION IMPACTS
8.7.1 Vibration during Construction
Measurements of vibration from construction plant have shown that, even
from percussive piling equipment, levels typically fall to imperceptibility
beyond approximately 100 m from the vibration source. Imperceptible
levels are reached at much smaller distances from other sources of
vibration, such as construction plant. There are no NSRs within 100 m of
potential sources of vibration associated with construction works. No
significant construction vibration impacts are expected.
8.7.2 Vibration during Operation
The design of the power station will ensure that vibration will be
imperceptible beyond the site boundary. No significant vibration impacts
are expected to occur during operation.
8.8 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
Potential cumulative impacts from this development may arise from the
operation of the project.
The baseline noise measurements have taken account of noise from the
existing power station, and the operational noise levels of the proposed
power station outlined in Table 8.4 will ensure that there will be a non
significant increase in operational noise.
Cumulative impacts from road traffic noise (personnel vehicles) may occur
during the peak month of the construction only.
8.9 MITIGATION
8.9.1 Construction
Construction works are expected to be undertaken during daytime hours.
However, there may be occasions, for example delivery of abnormal loads,
which may require evening or night-time construction.
Should this be necessary, the mitigation measures below will be included in
a Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) adopted by the project to control
noise impacts. The CoCP will be implemented during the works and take
account of the following:
• the proper use of such plant with respect to minimising noise emissions;
• the proper maintenance of plant, including plant housings and silencers;
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-14
• the selection of inherently quiet plant, and use of enclosures and screens
around noisy fixed plant. Site hoardings can also provide some benefit
from acoustic screening provided they are of suitable construction and
properly installed;
• placing noisy plant as far as possible from sensitive receptors;
• informing neighbouring building occupants and the local
Environmental Health Department when particularly noisy operations
are planned; and
• identifying a Baglan Bay Energy Park Project site liaison officer to deal
with noise and other environmental matters.
Furthermore, the Contractor will adhere to the codes of practice for
construction working and piling outlined in BS 5228 parts 1 and 4. This
advice will be incorporated within the CoCP for minimising noise
emissions from the site.
8.9.2 Operation
During operation, mitigation measures will include the following noise
control methods:
• Selection of quiet equipment and engineering solutions to reduce noise
at source and improve the sound insulation of buildings and enclosures
housing noisy equipment to ensure that operational noise achieves the
levels outlined in Table 8.4.
• Ensuring the proposed power plant site layout is optimised to provide
adequate distance between particular sources of noise and noise
sensitive buildings or areas and from using screening by natural and
engineered barriers and other buildings, as necessary.
With regard to engineering solutions, significant attenuation can be
achieved through established noise control packages, and given the
separation of the plant from NSRs, screening and other factors, it is
expected that the BS 4142 target levels outlined in Table 8.4 can be met.
8.10 CONCLUSIONS AND SUMMARY OF RESIDUAL IMPACTS
No significant residual impacts for the construction and operation of the
development are expected as these can be mitigated through design and
planning conditions as appropriate.
A temporary residual noise impact as a result of road traffic noise from
personnel vehicles associated with the construction of the scheme is
expected on residents living alongside the A48. This will only occur in the
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APCL – ABERNEDD POWER PLANT
8-15
hours when construction personnel will be travelling to and from site,
during the peak month of the 30 month Stage 1 construction period.
During commissioning there will be short periods between the hours of
09:00hrs and 17:30hrs when pipelines will be subjected to purging flows
and safety valves tested. These operations are short-term in duration, but
can cause high levels of noise and therefore result in temporary residual
noise impacts. These activities will take place occasionally and will last
only a few hours at a time.
No significant construction or operational vibration impacts are expected.
A summary of all impacts and mitigation measures is detailed in Table 8.5
below.
Table 8.5 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation
Impact Type Key Potential Impacts
(without mitigation)
Mitigation Residual Impact Means by which
mitigation will be
delivered
Noise and
Vibration
Impacts on noise sensitive
receptors resulting from
construction.
Construction works are expected to be undertaken during daytime hours.
However, there may be occasions, for example delivery of abnormal loads,
which may require evening or night-time construction
Should this be necessary, the mitigation measures below will be included
in a Construction HSSE Plan adopted by the project to control noise
impacts. The HSSE Plan will be implemented during the works and take
account of the following:
No significant residual
impacts predicted.
CoCP
the proper use of such plant with respect to minimising noise emissions; No significant residual
impacts predicted.
CoCP
the proper maintenance of plant, including plant housings and silencers; No significant residual
impacts predicted.
CoCP
the selection of inherently quiet plant, and use of enclosures and screens
around noisy fixed plant. Site hoardings can also provide some benefit
from acoustic screening provided they are of suitable construction and
properly installed;
No significant residual
impacts predicted.
CoCP
placing noisy plant as far as possible from sensitive receptors;
No significant residual
impacts predicted.
CoCP
Impact Type Key Potential Impacts
(without mitigation)
Mitigation Residual Impact Means by which
mitigation will be
delivered
informing neighbouring building occupants and the local Environmental
Health Department when particularly noisy operations are planned; and
No significant residual
impacts predicted.
CoCP
identifying a Baglan Bay Energy Park Project site liaison officer to deal
with noise and other environmental matters.
No significant residual
impacts predicted.
CoCP
The Contractor will adhere to the codes of practice for construction
working and piling outlined in BS 5228 parts 1 and 4. This advice will be
incorporated within the HSSE Plan for minimising noise emissions from
the site.
No significant residual
impacts predicted.
CoCP
Noise and
Vibration
Impacts on noise sensitive
receptors resulting from
Operation
Selection of quiet equipment and engineering solutions to reduce noise at
source and improve the sound insulation of buildings and enclosures
housing noisy equipment and operations, including design measures to
ensure that operational noise meets the levels outlined in Table 8.4.
No significant residual
impacts predicted.
CoCP
Ensuring the proposed CCGT power station site layout is optimised to
provide adequate distance between particular sources of noise and noise
sensitive buildings or areas and from using screening by natural and
engineered barriers and other buildings, as necessary.
No significant residual
impacts predicted
CoCP
With regard to engineering solutions, significant attenuation can be
achieved through established noise control packages, and given the
separation of the plant from NSRs, screening and other factors, it is
expected that the BS 4142 target levels outlined in Table 8.4 can be met.
No significant residual
impacts predicted
CoCP
Impact Type Key Potential Impacts
(without mitigation)
Mitigation Residual Impact Means by which
mitigation will be
delivered
Noise and
Vibration
Impacts on noise sensitive
receptors resulting from
Construction Traffic
Wherever practical, deliveries of abnormal loads will be made outside of
peak hours and where appropriate during the night.
Temporary residual noise
impact expected for the peak
month of construction.
CoCP
Construction vehicles will abide by the identified construction route. Temporary residual noise
impact expected for the peak
month of construction.
CoCP
Materials and equipment will be stored securely on site to minimise
unnecessary traffic movements.
Temporary residual noise
impact expected for the peak
month of construction.
CoCP