+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 8_chapter_04.pdf

8_chapter_04.pdf

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: rishaana-sarangan
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 16

Transcript
  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    1/16

    4.1 Overview

    The deceleration in inflation witnessed

    towards the end of 2008 continued fu rther

    in 2009, due to favourable developments

    in both demand side and supply side factors.

    The rate of inflation, as measured by the Colombo

    Consumers Price Index (CCPI) (2002=100),

    decelerated to 4.8 per cent in December 2009,

    on an year-on-year basis, from its peak level of28.2 per cent recorded in J une 2008. The effect

    of stringent monetary policy adopted by the CBSL

    during the previous two years and the decline in

    commodity prices in the international market coupled

    with improved domestic supply conditions and the

    downward revision of administered prices, aided the

    rapid deceleration in inflation. Inflationary pressure

    exerted through increase in wages of public and

    private sector employees was contained through

    favourable developments in supply side factors,

    enhanced labour productivity as well as the prudent

    monetary policy pursued by the CBSL. The gradual

    increase in the point-to-point inflation towards the last

    quarter of 2009, from 0.7 per cent in September to

    4.8 per cent in December 2009 was mainly a result of

    the dissipation of the impact of the high base in 2008.

    Meanwhile, the annual average inflation rate, which

    had been decelerating continuously from the peak

    of 23.4 per cent in October 2008, reached a single

    digit level of 8.5 per cent in August 2009 and further

    declined markedly to 3.4 per cent in December 2009.

    This was the lowest annual average (end year)

    inflation rate recorded since 1985. Meanwhile, the

    core inflation, which measures the price movement

    of non-food and non-energy items of the CCPI

    basket, too followed a decelerating trend throughoutthe year reaching 5.9 per cent on an year-on-year

    basis in December 2009 from 15.7 per cent in

    December 2008. The annual average core inflation

    also declined to 9.2 per cent in December 2009 as

    compared to 13.6 per cent in December 2008.

    Both the nominal and real wages of all three

    sectors, namely the public sector, formal private

    sector and informal private sector increased in

    2009, compared to the previous year. With the

    upward adjustments of the Cost of Living Allowance

    (COLA) in J anuary and November 2009 by

    Rs. 1,000 and Rs. 750 respectively, the nominal

    wage rate indices of all categories of public sector

    employees increased by around 9.4 per cent in 2009.

    Public sector employees further benefitted from the

    decelerating inflation experienced throughout the

    year, leading to a real wage increase of around 5.7

    PRICES, WAGES, EMPLOYMENT AND

    PRODUCTIVITY

    Chapter 4

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    2/16

    80

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    per cent in 2009, against the real wage decline in

    2008. Similarly, the minimum wages for three major

    categories of the formal private sector, governed

    by the Wages Boards Trades increased, raising

    the overall nominal wage rate index for the whole

    sector by 4.9 per cent. As a result of the gradual

    deceleration in inflation, they too enjoyed a real wage

    increase of 1.6 per cent, on average, during the year.

    Following a similar trend, both the nominal and real

    wages of informal sector workers also increased in

    2009.

    The rate of unemployment which had been

    declining over the past few years recording the

    lowest level in 2008, began to increase mainly due

    to the adverse impact of the global recession, on

    several sectors of the economy. Since the thirdquarter of 2009, however, the rate of unemployment

    started to decline indicating the resurgence of the

    economy with the ongoing economic activities

    and gradual recovery in the global economy.

    Meanwhile, there was a change in the composition

    of employment among the major industry groups,

    with the increasing dominance of the Services sector

    and the declining share of the Industry sector in total

    employment. Public sector employment, private

    sector employment and unpaid family workers grew

    during the year. However, a decline was observedin the self-employed and employer categories. The

    ongoing and planned infrastructure development

    projects are likely to create more employment

    opportunities. Increased activities in the Agriculture

    sector, particularly in the Northern and the Eastern

    Provinces would also generate employment

    opportunities. Meanwhile, the improvement in labour

    productivity in recent years continued. At the same

    time, foreign employment, which amounted to one

    fourth of the total domestically employed population,

    continued to contribute significantly to the economy

    in terms of foreign exchange earnings.

    4.2 Prices

    Price Movements and Contributory

    Factors

    Colombo Consumers Price index (CCPI)

    The CCPI, the official consumer price index of

    the country, recorded a 4.8 per cent increase on

    an year-on-year basis and a 3.4 per cent increase

    on an annual average basis, the lowest end year

    annual average rate recorded for a period of

    more than two decades. The Index rose by 9.8

    index points from 203.7 in December 2008 to 213.5

    in December 2009. The point-to-point change in

    the index decreased steadily from 10.7 per cent in

    J anuary to 0.7 per cent in September 2009, reaching

    the lowest level recorded in more than five years.

    It then increased gradually to reach 4.8 per cent in

    December 2009. The annual average inflation rate

    continued its declining trend throughout the year from

    the peak level of 23.4 per cent in October 2008.

    The decline in inflation in 2009 was consequential

    upon both the demand and supply side factors.On the demand side, stringent monetary policy

    measures implemented during the last two years

    supported to curtail demand pressures in the

    economy. Favourable developments on the supply

    side, increased productivity as well as prudent

    monetary policy measures helped to curtail any

    demand pressure, which would have arisen as a

    consequence of the increase in wages of public and

    private sector employees. Improved domestic supply

    conditions, mainly from the Northern and the Eastern

    Provinces and the decline in international commodity

    prices as well as the stable exchange rate lowered

    the price pressure on the CCPI during the year.

    Price increases in domestically produced

    goods , which on average accounted for around

    72.6 per cent of total monthly consumption

    expenditure in 2009, largely impacted on

    inflation during the year. The contribution from

    domestically produced goods to the year-on-year

    Chart 4.1 Colombo Consumers' Price Index (2002=100)

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    Jan

    Mar

    May

    Jul

    Sep

    Nov

    Jan

    Mar

    May

    Jul

    Sep

    Nov

    Jan

    Mar

    May

    Jul

    Sep

    Nov

    2007 2008 2009

    Percent

    Annual Average Change % Point-to-Point Change %

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    3/16

    81

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    inflation increased from 75.4 per cent in J anuary

    2009 to 100.6 per cent in December 2009, while that

    from imported items declined from 24.6 per cent in

    J anuary 2009 to -0.6 per cent in December 2009,

    in line with the rapid easing of commodity prices in

    the international market.

    The major contribution to inflation came from

    the Food and non-alcoholic beverages sub-

    index, which has the highest weight of 46.7 per

    cent in the CCPI. The point-to-point change in the

    Food sub-index decreased rapidly from 10.2 per cent

    at the beginning of the year to -1.1 per cent in April

    2009, but increased thereafter, reaching 6.0 per cent

    in December 2009. Overall inflation moved almost

    in line with the Food-sub index due to its dominance

    in the overall index. The Food sub-index contributed

    40.1 per cent to the annual average change in the

    overall CCPI during the year. The annual average

    increase of the Food sub-index was 2.8 per cent as

    at end 2009. The price increases infish, lime, garlic,

    big onions and red onions, sugar, dhal, potatoes and

    eggs were the key items which contributed to the

    increase in the Food sub-index.

    The decl ine in average prices of certain

    domestic agricultural products , especially of

    rice, pulses, vegetables and coconuts, due to

    the increase in domestic supply conditions

    contr ibuted to lower the price pressure. Despite

    paddy prices recording increases in the middle and

    the end of the year due to supply shortages resulting

    from the bad weather conditions that affected the

    Yala harvest, the average price of rice declined by 2.1

    per cent during 2009 compared to 2008. Satisfactory

    2008/2009 Maha harvest, the price ceiling imposed

    by the government on rice, and duty exemption on

    rice imports towards the end of the year, helped

    Table 4.1 Changes in Price Indices

    Sources : Department of Census and StatisticsCentral Bank of Sri Lanka

    Average IndexPoint-to-Point

    Percentage ChangeAnnual Average

    Percentage Change

    (a) Provisional

    2009/2008(a)2008/2007Dec. 2009/

    Dec. 2008(a)Dec. 2008/Dec. 2007

    2009(a)20082007

    CCPI(2002=100) 163.1 199.9 206.8 14.4 4.8 22.6 3.4WPI 2,924.4 3,653.6 3,500.9 0.7 13.3 24.9 -4.2GDP Deflator 298.3 315.1 - - 16.3 5.7

    Index

    (b) Revised

    256.4 (b)

    Table 4.2 Retail Prices of Key Imported and Domestically Produced Items

    Dec. 2008/

    Dec. 2007

    Percentage Change

    Source : Central Bank of Sri Lanka(a) Provisional

    2008/

    2007

    Dec.2008

    Dec.2007

    20082007

    CCPI(2002=100)Weight %

    Unit Annual Average Point-to-Point

    Price - Rs.

    Annual AverageItem

    Dec. 2009/

    Dec. 2008(a)

    Dec.2009(a)

    2009(a)2009/

    2008(a)Domestic Rice - Samba kg 2.8 50.98 76.53 76.57 63.71 78.64 82.41 50.1 0.1 23.4 4.8

    Rice - Kekulu (Red) kg 0.9 44.56 64.65 63.64 55.32 66.38 66.78 45.1 -1.6 20.0 0.6Rice - Kekulu (White) kg 0.6 38.78 60.66 59.85 51.68 62.63 63.22 56.4 -1.3 21.2 0.9Rice - Nadu kg 0.5 44.45 65.29 65.44 56.99 68.43 69.45 46.9 0.2 20.1 1.5Coconut (medium) Nut 5.4 21.83 28.88 23.02 27.83 24.87 27.53 32.3 -20.3 -10.6 10.7Fish - Kelawalla kg 1.1 407.10 471.50 510.18 414.72 490.07 502.60 15.8 8.2 18.2 2.6Beans kg 0.5 83.51 102.60 95.41 82.93 110.27 116.04 22.9 -7.0 33.0 5.2Brinjals kg 0.2 52.12 64.57 60.03 55.99 81.49 82.53 23.9 -7.0 45.5 1.3Eggs One 0.4 9.31 10.16 11.44 11.64 11.55 14.53 9.1 12.6 -0.8 25.8

    Imports Sugar kg 1.1 54.30 63.58 82.09 53.21 66.12 88.12 17.1 29.1 24.3 33.3Milk Powder - Anchor 400g 3.8 189.32 274.63 254.30 268.82 267.32 232.77 45.1 -7.4 -0.6 -12.9Red Dhal kg 0.8 103.80 189.11 199.37 117.64 205.31 177.66 82.2 5.4 74.5 -13.5Wheat Flour kg 0.2 55.36 73.86 71.75 66.12 71.81 70.62 33.4 -2.9 8.6 -1.7

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    4/16

    82

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    rice price to decline. The prices of vegetables were

    also relatively lower compared to the previous year,

    although increases were reported in certain months

    of the year. The domestic price of potato, on average,

    increased by 19.5 per cent in 2009 compared to the

    previous year, due mainly to the decreased supply

    resulting from the unfavourable weather conditions

    that prevailed in potato growing areas. The average

    price of coconut and coconut oil decreased by 22.2

    per cent and 24.0 per cent, respectively, in 2009

    compared to 2008.

    The average price offish and seafood increased

    by around 4.4 per cent during 2009 largely due

    to increased demand and supply fluctuations.

    Nevertheless, in line with the commencement of the

    fishing season in J uly and the relaxation of limitations

    onfishing in the Northern and Eastern coastal areas,

    the fish supply increased since J une 2009 and the

    prices offish moderated.

    The administrative price revisions effected

    during the year has had an impact on the price

    of both domestically produced and imported

    goods. The fuel price reductions effective from

    end December 2008 (petrol by Rs. 10, diesel by

    Rs. 10 and kerosene by Rs. 2 per litre) has had

    a direct and indirect impact on prices. However,

    the upward adjustment of the price of petrol, diesel

    and kerosene by Rs. 10, Rs. 3 and Re. 1 per litre,

    respectively, in J uly 2009 in line with the increase in

    the import price of crude oil from US dollars 41.71 per

    barrel in J anuary 2009 to US dollars 72.8 per barrel

    in J une 2009, exerted a slight upward pressure on

    prices during the rest of the year. The impact of the

    reduction of the price of petrol by Rs. 15 per litre

    w.e.f. December 30, 2009 would be felt in 2010.

    Meanwhile, the LP gas prices were revised on six

    occasions in 2009. The price of a 12.5 kg cylinder

    of LP gas of Shell and Laugfs was reduced by

    Rs. 166 (9.3 per cent) and Rs. 276 (16.4 per cent), to

    Table 4.3 Administered Price Revisions in 2008 and 2009

    2008/2007

    Percentage Change

    2008

    UnitItem

    2007

    Price (Dec.) - Rs.

    2009 2009/2008Cigarettes (Gold-leaf) Each 14.00 16.00 18.00 14.3 12.5

    Cigarettes (Bristol/Viceroy) Each 12.00 13.00 14.00 8.3 7.7

    Coconut Arrack 750 ml 525.00 550.00 610.00 4.8 10.9

    Extra Special Arrack 750 ml 450.00 500.00 565.00 11.1 13.0

    Diesel 1 ltr. 75.00 70.00 73.00 -6.7 4.3

    Kerosene 1 ltr. 68.00 50.00 51.00 -26.5 2.0

    Petrol 1 ltr. 117.00 120.00 115.00 2.6 -4.2

    Gas- Shell 12.5kg 1,313.00 1,619.00 1,550.00 23.3 -4.3

    Gas- Laugfs 12.5kg 1,248.00 1,403.00 1,421.00 12.4 1.3

    Furnace Oil (1000) 1 ltr. 52.70 32.70 42.70 -38.0 30.6

    Furnace Oil (1500) 1 ltr. 51.70 31.70 41.70 -38.7 31.5

    Furnace Oil (3500) 1 ltr. 46.65 25.00 36.65 -46.4 46.6

    Electricity - Fixed Charges Tariff Block

    First 30 units 60.00 60.00 60.00 0.0 0.0

    31 - 60 units 90.00 90.00 90.00 0.0 0.061 - 90 units 120.00 120.00 120.00 0.0 0.0

    91 - 180 units 180.00 180.00 180.00 0.0 0.0

    Above 180 units 240.00 240.00 240.00 0.0 0.0

    Electricity - Unit Charges Tariff Block

    First 30 units 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.0 0.0

    31 - 60 units 4.70 4.70 4.70 0.0 0.0

    61 - 90 units 7.50 7.50 7.50 0.0 0.0

    91 - 180 units 14.00 16.00 16.00 14.3 0.0

    Above 180 units 19.80 25.00 25.00 26.3 0.0

    Bus Fare - - - 17.6 5.3

    Source : Central Bank of Sri Lanka

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    5/16

    83

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    Box 6 Introducing a New Core Inflation Measure for Sri Lanka

    Concept, Measures and International Practices

    Price stability, which refers to achieving and

    maintaining a low and stable level of inflation, is

    the prime objective of many central banks. In order

    to achieve price stability, central banks conduct

    monetary policy with a forward looking perspective

    as monetary policy actions affect inflation with a time

    lag. Headline inflation1 is the widely used measure

    of inflation for the conduct of monetary policy as it

    is a simple and easily understood measure. Headline

    inflation includes all price movements including those

    driven by seasonality, changes in government taxes,

    and international commodity prices. By including all

    items, particularly items with high price volatility,

    headline inflation tends to be inherently noisy, not

    reflecting changes and the directions in the underlying

    rate of inflation.

    Therefore, although headline inflation provides useful

    information for setting and conducting monetary policy,

    policymakers are required to understand underlying

    trends in prices driven by demand pressures in the

    economy, as otherwise it could lead to wrong policy

    decisions, which could adversely affect macroeconomic

    stability. Hence, policymakers are required to track

    the persistent or underlying movements in price tobetter calibrate their monetary policy decisions. The

    measure of core inflation provides such information

    about underlying inflationary trends.

    Although the term core inflation is widely used in

    contemporary monetary policy literature, there is

    no commonly accepted theoretical definition for it.

    Bryan and Cecchetti (1993), for example, suggest

    that core inflation relates to the growth rate of the

    money supply. Quah and Vahey (1995) define core

    inflation as that component of measured inflation

    that has no medium to long-run impact on real output,

    while Blinder (1997) identifies core inflation with the

    durable part of inflation. Mishkin (2007) defines core

    inflation as a measure of inflation that excludes the rate

    of increase of prices for certain volatile components in

    price indices.

    Since core inflation cannot be directly observed,

    several alternative methods have been proposed to

    measure core inflation.2 Empirical studies have found

    that core inflation measures derived using different

    methodologies yield different outcomes that can be

    used for different purposes in the conduct of monetary

    policy. Amongst the various methodologies, the most

    commonly used approach to measure core inflation

    is the exclusion method. The main advantages of

    exclusion based core inflation measures are, their

    availability on a timely basis, transparency, simplicity,

    and comparability. However, removing items on an

    arbitrary basis can be viewed as the main drawback of

    exclusion based measures of core inflation.

    Measuring Core Inflation in Sri Lanka

    Actions taken by the Central Bank of Sri Lanka

    (CBSL) to achieve the price stability objective is

    mainly guided by the movement of average changes

    and year-on-year changes in the Colombo Consumers

    Price Index (CCPI) compiled by the Department of

    Census and Statistics (DCS). However, headline

    inflation in Sri Lanka is subject to large variations

    resulting mainly from excessive fluctuations in

    food prices and administratively decided changes

    in energy and transport prices. Major fluctuations

    in food prices due to changes in weather conditionsand the impact of external price shocks that create

    transitory movements in the CCPI persist only for a

    temporary period. In addition, administered prices,

    which mainly include energy and transport, do not

    respond to monetary policy actions and one-off

    changes of such prices tend to distort general price

    trends. Such volatile items account for a significant

    percentage of the price index, thereby generating

    erratic movements in the overall index3. This situation

    warrants monitoring core inflation measures, which

    are free from high volatility and abnormal shocks,in order to trace underlying inflation trends in Sri

    Lanka.

    CBSL has been using several core inflation measures

    to facilitate the conduct of monetary policy. In 1997,

    CBSL compiled the first series for core inflation which

    was derived by removing items with administered

    prices from the CCPI (1952 =100). Since then,

    1 Headline inflation refers to the rate of change in the consumer price index and measures the total inflation within an economy.

    2 A detailed analysis of the methods used to compile core inflation measures is presented in the Box Article on Core Inflation Central Bank Annual Report 2006.

    3 For instance, the first 10 most volatile items account for approximately 19 per cent of the total index, while the first 20 most volatile items account for about 40per cent of the total index.

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    6/16

    84

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    4 Statistical criteria outlined in the literature such as volatility of core inflation, long-run relationships and causalities between headline inflation, core inflation andmoney supply and the predictive power of core inflation measures were examined.

    Dec-04 13.0 9.0 9.9 9.1 9.7 8.2

    Dec-05 7.4 11.0 9.2 10.3 8.5 10.8

    Dec-06 13.5 10.0 8.6 8.5 12.4 9.7

    Dec-07 18.8 15.8 8.1 7.7 17.0 12.8

    Dec-08 14.4 22.6 15.7 13.6 13.3 19.5

    Mar-09 5.3 18.7 14.2 15.2 8.1 16.7

    Jun-09 0.9 12.5 7.7 15.2 6.3 12.9

    Sep-09 0.7 6.6 5.4 12.1 5.8 9.1

    Dec-09 4.8 3.4 5.9 9.2 5.8 7.0

    Period Headline Inflation Core Inflation

    Current Measure 1/ New Measure 2/Year-on-

    year

    Year-on-

    yearYear-on-

    year

    Annual

    Average

    Annual

    Average

    Annual

    Average

    Table B 6.1Movements in Headline and

    Core Inflation Measures (% Change)

    1/ Excludes Food and Energy Categories of CCPI (2002=100), accounts for

    54.9 per cent of the total index.2/ Excludes Fresh Food, Rice, Coconut, Energy and Transport Categories of

    CCPI (2002=100), accounts for 31.1 per cent of the total index.

    References :

    Blinder, A. (1997). Commentary on Measuring Short-Run Inflation for Central

    Bankers. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, May/June, pp. 157-160.

    Bryan, Michael F., and Stephen G. Cecchetti. (1993). Measuring Core Inflation.

    NBER Working Paper No. 4303, National Bureau of Economic Research,

    Cambridge.

    Mishkin, Frederic S. (2007). Headline versus Core Inflation in the Conduct of

    Monetary Policy. Remarks at the Business Cycles, International Transmission

    and Macroeconomic Policies Conference, Montreal, October.

    Quah, Danny and Shaun P. Vahey. (1995). Measuring Core Inflation.Economic

    Journal, Vol. 105 (September), pp. 1130-44.

    several attempts were made to improve the measure of

    core inflation based on different techniques and some

    of these measures were published for the information

    of the general public. With the revision to the CCPI

    (2002 = 100) by the DCS in 2007, a new core inflation

    measure was derived by removing the entire food

    and energy categories of the total index and has been

    published since early 2008.

    With a view to improving the methodology and introducing

    a new core inflation measure along with the proposed

    revision to the CCPI based on the Household Income

    and Expenditure Survey 2006/07, CBSL has compiled a

    series of core inflation measures based on international

    best practices, while addressing several weaknesses of the

    existing measure. These measures were evaluated based

    on statistical properties4. The results indicate that different

    measures fulfill different properties of a representative

    core inflation measure, and provide a reliable guide to the

    trends in underlying inflation.

    When comparing the relative performance of alternative

    core inflation measures, exclusion appears to be the

    most appropriate method for measuring core inflation

    in Sri Lanka. Accordingly, a new core inflation measure

    was derived by excluding fresh food, rice, coconut,

    energy and transport categories from the headline

    index. Excluding only these categories was considered

    appropriate given the high volatility in fresh food prices,

    such as fish, vegetables, and fruit and also some other

    food prices like rice and coconut and administratively

    determined energy and transport prices. This measure

    broadly complies with international best practices,

    particularly with regard to the extent of exclusion and

    the items excluded. It also fulfils many statistical criteria

    of a representative core inflation measure and broadly

    follows the general trend in headline inflation.

    The new core inflation measure is expected to facilitate

    the conduct of monetary policy by CBSL, as it provides

    greater information about persistent movements

    in inflation than headline inflation. Also, given its

    simplicity and computability, this measure would bebetter understood by the general public, thus helping

    to manage expectations. However, as price stability

    ultimately involves controlling overall headline

    inflation, CBSL would continue to pay attention to

    headline inflation, while monitoring the trends in core

    inflation to ensure a thorough and careful analysis of the

    forces which drive inflation dynamics in the economy.

    Rs.1,619 and Rs.1,403 respectively, w.e.f. December31, 2008. As a result of the net impact of the six

    price revisions in 2009 (from both distributors), the

    domestic price of Shell gas declined by 4.3 per cent

    to Rs.1,550 and the price of Laugfs gas increased

    by 1.3 per cent to Rs.1,421, by end of the year.

    In l ine wi th the decl ine in in ternat ional

    commodity prices, local prices of key consumer

    items also declined. Decrease in freight charges at

    the beginning of the year also might have contributed

    towards the decline in the prices. Accordingly, theaverage import price of wheat flour, milk powder,

    palm oil and vegetable oil declined. However, the

    price of dhal and sugar increased in the international

    market in line with supply shortages of the same.

    To stabilize their domestic prices, the government

    imposed a price ceiling on these commodities at

    the beginning of April 2009. The price ceiling was

    removed from May 01, 2009. The government

    also made arrangements to sell several key food

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    7/16

    85

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    items at a lower price through co-operative stores.

    Accordingly, the price of sugar, dhal and cannedfish

    was reduced w.e.f. November 07, 2009. Further,

    the import tax on milk powder and wheat flour were

    reduced by Rs.15 and Rs.10 per kg respectively,

    w.e.f. J uly 20, 2009 and December 18, 2009.

    New taxes and levies also have had an impact

    on prices. The introduction of a new tax Fixed Line

    Subscriber Levy on telephone usage w.e.f. J anuary

    15, 2009 and the Nation Building Tax of 1 per cent

    w.e.f. March 2009 had a direct impact on the CCPI.

    The Nation Building Tax was increased to 3 per cent

    effective from May 2009. The increase in water tariff

    by the National Water Supply and Drainage Board

    effective from February 15, 2009 also contributed to

    the increase in the price index.

    Other significant contribu tions to the increase

    in the index came from the sub-indices of Health,

    Recreation and culture, and Education which

    contributed 19.3 per cent, 10.7 per cent and 9.3

    per cent, respectively, to the annual average

    increase in 2009 despite the weights attached

    to them being relatively low. The increase in

    the Health sub-index was mainly attributed to the

    price increases in the services by private hospitals,

    pharmaceuticals, specialist consultations andmedical laboratory services. Increases in hotel

    charges and tuition fees caused the sub-indices

    of Recreation and culture, and Education to move

    upward. Meanwhile, the Transport sub-group

    recorded a negative contribution of 2.1 per cent to the

    annual average inflation. The downward revisions

    in fuel prices and public transport charges caused

    the Transport sub-group to contribute negatively to

    inflation. The contribution of all the other sub-groups

    ranged from 1.9 per cent to 6.6 per cent.

    The base year of CCPI is expected to be revised

    from 2002 to 2006/2007 in 2010. In order to reflect

    more recent changes in household consumption

    pattern owing to improvement in income levels and

    the changes in consumer tastes and preferences,

    the DCS has initiated action to update the basket of

    items and their weights in the CCPI, based on the

    Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES)

    conducted in 2006/2007. The updated version of the

    CCPI is expected to be released in 2010.

    Wholesale Price Index (WPI)

    In f la t ion at the pr imary market level as

    measured by the WPI showed high volatility in

    2009. On a point-to-point basis a deflationary trend

    was observed during the first nine months of 2009.The point-to-point increase of the WPI which was at a

    peak level of 42.1 per cent in May 2008, decelerated

    rapidly to -0.4 per cent in September 2009. The trend

    reversed thereafter and by end 2009 the point-to-

    point increase of the WPI reached 13.3 per cent.

    On an annual average basis, the WPI declined

    by 4.2 per cent as at end 2009.The annual average

    increase of the sub-index for the food category was

    0.6 per cent. The sub-indices for Petroleum, Metal

    products, Electrical products and Miscellaneousproducts declined on an annual average basis by

    22.8 per cent, 7.6 per cent, 1.0 per cent and 24.4

    per cent, respectively in 2009. When the source-wise

    classification of the WPI is considered, prices in the

    Domestic category increased modestly by 3.5 per

    cent on an annual average basis during the year,

    while prices in the Import and Export categories

    recorded declines of 10.9 per cent and 6.7 per

    cent, respectively, indicating that it was mainly

    international price developments that exerted

    downward pressure on the WPI. P rice declines inwheat grain, wheat flour, kerosene, diesel, petrol

    and milk powder contributed to the decline in the

    prices in the Import group, while price declines in

    coconut, coconut oil and rubber caused the decline

    in the Export group. When the end-use classification

    of the WPI is considered, prices in the Intermediate

    group dropped sharply by 21.8 per cent on an

    annual average basis, at end year while prices

    in both the Consumer and Investment categories

    registered increases of 2.6 per cent and 2.4 per cent,

    respectively. The decline in the prices of tobacco,

    wheat grain, kerosene, diesel, cocoa, rubber and

    insulated wire were responsible for the decline in

    prices in the Intermediate category.

    GDP Deflator

    The GDP deflator, which is an alternative

    measure of inflation, indicated a deceleration in

    the overall pr ice increase in 2009 to 5.7 per cent

    as compared to 16.3 per cent recorded in 2008. In

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    8/16

    86

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    contrast to the trend observed in the last two years,

    the Agriculture sector recorded the lowest inflation

    rate of -0.2 per cent, as against the highest rate of

    31.3 per cent recorded in 2008. The highest inflation

    rate of 6.7 per cent was recorded in the Services

    sector in 2009, which however was significantly

    lower compared to 14.4 per cent recorded by this

    sector in 2008. The inflation in the Industry sector

    also decreased to 6.2 per cent in 2009 compared

    to 14.2 per cent in 2008.

    4.3 Wages

    The wages of both the public and private

    sector employees, reported increases in nominal

    terms in 2009. Wage rate indices of the public

    sector, minimum wage rate indices of the formalprivate sector (whose wages are governed by the

    Wages Boards Trades) and the daily wages of

    the informal private sector, reported increases in

    nominal terms in 2009 as compared to the previous

    year. Simultaneously, these employees enjoyed an

    increase in their real wages too in 2009, due mainly

    to the deceleration in inflation.

    Public Sector Wages

    Real wages of the public sector increased in

    2009. With the declining inflation and the increase

    in nominal wages on account of the adjustment in

    the monthly COLA paid to public sector employees

    on two occasions during the year, a significant gain

    in real wage rate indices of all categories of public

    sector employees was observed in 2009, as against

    the real wage losses suffered by them in 2008. The

    increase in the nominal wage rate indices of public

    sector employees, which includes wages of non-

    executive employees, school teachers and minoremployees, was due mainly to the enhancement

    of the monthly COLA for public sector employees

    by Rs.1,000 and Rs.750 w.e.f. J anuary 2009

    and November 2009, respectively. With these

    upward revisions, the monthly COLA payable to

    all employees in the Public Service, Provincial

    Public Service and Armed Forces, rose from Rs.

    3,500 to Rs. 5,250 in 2009. Similarly, the monthly

    COLA payable to public servants, who are drawing

    daily paid emoluments, was also increased fromRs. 116.66 to Rs. 150 in January 2009 and further

    to Rs.175 in November 2009. Mainly due to these

    increases, the overall nominal wage rate index of

    government employees, increased by 9.4 per cent.

    Accordingly, on average, wage indices of non-

    Table 4.4 Sectoral Deflators and GDP Deflator

    Sector IndexPercentage Change

    Sources : Department of Census and StatisticsCentral Bank of Sri Lanka

    (a) Revised(b) Provisional

    2008/2007(a)20082007(a) 2009/2008(b)2009(b)

    Agriculture 260.7 342.2 341.7 31.3 -0.2Industry 266.1 304.0 322.9 14.2 6.2Services 249.3 285.1 304.2 14.4 6.7GDP 256.4 298.3 315.1 16.3 5.7

    Table 4.5 Wage Rate Indices

    Nominal Real (a)Real (a)Nominal

    2008 2009(b)20072008 2009(b)20072008 2009(b)20072008 2009(b)2007

    (a) Real wage rate indices are based on CCPI (2002=100)(b) Provisional

    Sources : Department of LabourCentral Bank of Sri Lanka

    Percentage ChangeIndex

    (December 1978=100)

    Employment Category

    1. Government employeesCentral government employees 3,828.4 4,116.1 4,502.9 171.6 150.4 159.0 21.5 7.5 9.4 5.0 -12.4 5.7

    Non-executives 3,493.4 3,749.5 4,082.4 156.6 137.0 144.2 22.4 7.3 8.9 5.7 -12.5 5.3Minor employees 4,172.7 4,494.7 4,943.5 187.0 164.2 174.6 20.5 7.7 10.0 4.1 -12.2 6.3

    Government school teachers 2,740.0 2,938.6 3,215.3 122.8 107.4 113.5 18.9 7.2 9.4 2.7 -12.5 5.7

    2. Workers in Wages Boards TradesAll Wages Boards Trades 1,648.8 2,070.4 2,171.4 73.6 75.5 76.7 21.4 25.6 4.9 4.1 2.6 1.6

    Workers in agriculture 1,821.4 2,286.6 2,349.4 81.3 83.5 83.0 16.2 25.5 2.7 -0.3 2.6 -0.6Workers in industry and commerce1,522.4 1,877.5 2,054.0 67.9 68.5 72.5 39.6 23.3 9.4 19.6 0.9 5.8Workers in services 1,057.1 1,370.8 1,545.8 47.1 49.9 54.6 35.6 29.7 12.8 16.0 5.9 9.4

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    9/16

    87

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    executive officers, minor employees and government

    school teachers in 2009 rose by 8.9 per cent, 10.0

    per cent and 9.4 per cent, respectively, in nominal

    terms compared to the range of 7-8 per cent in 2008.

    As a combined outcome of the developments in

    nominal wage increases and deceleration in inflation,

    the government employees enjoyed an increase

    in their real wages during 2009. Accordingly, non-

    executive officers, minor employees and government

    school teachers enjoyed real wage increases of 5.3

    per cent, 6.3 per cent and 5.7 per cent, respectively

    in 2009 compared to the real wage losses incurred

    in the range of 12.2 12.5 per cent in 2008.

    Consequently, the overall real wage rate index of

    central government employees increased by 5.7 per

    cent over the previous year.

    Formal Private Sector Wages

    Movements of wages of the formal private

    sector are monitored through the minimum wage

    rate indices that cover only the minimum wages

    of employees whose wages are administered

    by regulations under the Wages Boards Trades.

    The minimum wage rate indices in the three major

    categories of the formal private sector, namely,

    Agriculture, Industry and Commerce, and Services

    increased in nominal terms by 2.7 per cent, 9.4 per

    cent and 12.8 per cent, respectively, in 2009, while

    the overall wage rate index for the whole sector

    recorded an increase of 4.9 per cent over 2008. The

    increase was mainly attributable to the increases

    in minimum wages of workers in the Industry and

    Commerce sector and the Services sector in July

    2008.

    When the nominal wage rate indices were

    adjusted for inflation, employees in Industry and

    Commerce, and Services sectors enjoyed an

    increase in their real wages in 2009.The overall

    real wage rate index for employees in Wages Boards

    Trades, on average, increased by 1.6 per cent in2009 over the previous year, mainly due to the sharp

    deceleration in the inflation rate. Employees in the

    Services sector and Industry and Commerce sector

    enjoyed a significant increase in their real wages by

    9.4 per cent and 5.8 per cent, respectively, during

    the year under review. However, the real wages

    of employees in the Agriculture sector decreased

    marginally by 0.6 per cent during 2009, compared

    to an increase of 2.6 per cent in the previous year.

    Table 4.6 Informal Private Sector Daily Wages by Sector and Gender (a)

    Sector Nominal Real (b)

    1. Agriculture SectorTea

    Male 375 440 496 17.4 12.6 -4.2 8.8Female 263 305 356 16.1 16.5 -5.2 12.6

    RubberMale 389 500 532 28.4 6.5 4.8 2.9Female 277 377 416 36.3 10.1 11.2 6.4

    Coconut (d)

    Male 479 590 652 23.1 10.5 0.5 6.8Paddy

    Male 456 562 615 23.2 9.4 0.5 5.8Female 336 395 423 17.6 7.0 -4.0 3.5

    2. Construction Sector (d)Carpentry

    Master Carpenter - Male 732 844 932 15.3 10.4 -5.9 6.7Skilled and Unskilled Helper- Male 479 558 617 16.6 10.6 -4.9 6.9

    MasonryMaster Mason - Male 727 837 935 15.1 11.7 -6.1 8.0Skilled and Unskilled Helper- Male 474 561 627 18.4 11.7 -3.4 8.0

    2009(c)20082009(c)20082009(c)20082007

    (a) Wage Information were based on monthly wages from 90 centres.(b) Real wage percentage changes are based on CCPI (2002=100).(c) Provisional(d) Female participation is minimal in the Coconut and Construction sectors.

    Source : Central Bank of Sri Lanka

    Percentage ChangeAnnual Average (Rs.)

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    10/16

    88

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    Informal Private Sector Wages

    Wages in the informal private sector wh ich are

    compiled based on a regular survey increased in

    nominal terms for all activities. Generally, wages

    in the informal sector tend to get adjusted to reflectboth demand and supply conditions in the economy

    and the level of the reservation wage of labour.

    The information on the daily wage of the informal

    private sector for the Agriculture and Construction

    sectors, collected under the Country Wide Data

    Collection System (CWDCS), revealed a nominal

    growth in wages in 2009. Informal sector wages in

    the Agriculture and Construction sectors increased

    by 10.0 per cent and 11.1 per cent, respectively,

    in 2009 compared to the previous year. Within the

    Agriculture sector, the average daily wage of thesub-categories of Paddy, Coconut, Rubber and Tea

    increased by 8.4 per cent, 10.1 per cent, 8.0 per

    cent and 14.2 per cent, respectively in 2009 against

    2008. The rate of increase in the daily wage of the

    sub-categories in the Agricultural sector varied partly

    due to the diversity among the different activities and

    the supply of labour. In addition, the demand made

    by these workers for a higher daily wage, in order to

    maintain their real wage at a certain level also had

    an impact on wage rates. Similarly, the increase in

    prices of certain export items, especially, tea and

    rubber towards the latter part of the year, enabled

    producers to make higher payment for the service

    of labour rendered. A significant increase in the real

    wages of the employees in all the sub-categories in

    the Agriculture sector and Construction sector were

    recorded in 2009. Accordingly, the daily real wage

    of Tea, Rubber, Coconut and Paddy sub-sectors

    in the Agricultural sector on average increased by

    10.4 per cent, 4.4 per cent, 6.5 per cent and 4.8

    per cent, respectively. Meanwhile, the wage for

    carpentry and masonry in the Construction sector

    recorded an increase of around 7 - 8 per cent in real

    terms, respectively, possibly due to the shortage of

    skilled workers in certain areas. This was a notable

    improvement against the real wage losses suffered

    by these workers in 2008.

    1 The levels and trends of labour force, employment and unemployment in Sri Lanka are based on the Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS) conductedby the DCS. The coverage of the QLFS was extended to the Eastern Province in thefirst quarter of 2008. Though the DCS plans to expandits sample coverage to the entire country, the Northern Province was not covered fully by the QLFS during the last few years due to the unsettledconditions prevailing in some districts of this province. Accordingly, the labour force data excluding the Northern Province has been used in theanalysis, unless otherwise stated.

    Table 4.7 District-wise Population

    Source: Registrar Generals Department

    000 Persons

    Colombo 2,488 2,521 33 1.3

    Kandy 1,396 1,415 19 1.4Ratnapura 1,099 1,113 14 1.3

    Badulla 861 874 13 1.5

    Kurunegala 1,535 1,550 15 1.0

    Gampaha 2,152 2,165 13 0.6

    Galle 1,063 1,074 11 1.0

    Anuradhapura 809 820 11 1.4

    Kalutara 1,118 1,128 10 0.9

    Matara 822 831 9 1.1

    Nuwara Eliya 749 755 6 0.8

    Ampara 624 634 10 1.6

    Batticaloa 530 537 7 1.3

    Puttalam 760 770 10 1.3

    Jaffna 603 607 4 0.7

    Matale 483 490 7 1.4

    Trincomalee 361 368 7 1.9

    Hambantota 558 565 7 1.3

    Moneragala 430 435 5 1.2

    Polonnnaruwa 400 405 5 1.3

    Mulaitivu 150 154 4 2.7

    Kilinochchi 150 154 4 2.7

    Vavuniya 167 169 2 1.2

    Kegalle 807 813 6 0.7

    Mannar 102 103 1 1.0

    Total 20,217 20,450 233 1.1

    District 2009(a) Change(a)PercentageChange(a)

    (a) Provisional

    2008

    4.4 Population, Labour Force andEmployment

    Population

    The mid-year population is estimated at 20.45million in 2009, an increase of 1.1 per cent

    compared with 1.0 per cent growth recorded in

    2008. Population in all districts increased in 2009.

    High increases in population were recorded in

    Colombo, Kandy, Kurunegala, Ratnapura, Gampaha,

    Badulla, Galle and Anuradhapura Districts, which

    together contributed over 55 per cent to the overall

    growth in 2009.

    Labour Force

    According to the QLFS1, the labour force, which

    is defined as the economically active population

    aged 10 years and above, decreased marginally

    by 0.1 per cent to 8.07 million in 2009 compared

    to 8.08 million in the previous year. Meanwhile,

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    11/16

    89

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    the labour force, excluding both the Northern and

    the Eastern Provinces, remained at the same level

    of 7.57 million in 2009.

    The total labour fo rce comprised of 7.60 million

    employed and 0.47 million unemployed persons.

    Meanwhile, the labour force participation rate

    (LFPR), which is the ratio of the labour force to the

    total population aged 10 years and above, decreased

    to 48.7 per cent in 2009 from 49.5 per cent in the

    previous year. This decrease was seen in both male

    and female LFPRs which were reported at 66.6 per

    cent and 32.8 per cent, respectively. The genderanalysis of the LFPR over the years had shown that

    the participation rate of males has been almost twice

    that of females, throughout the recent past.

    Employment

    According to the QLFS, the number of employed

    persons2 decreased by 0.6 per cent to 7.60 mil lion

    in 2009 as compared to 7.65 milli on in 2008. This

    decline was due to the weaker demand for labour

    resulting from the general slowdown in economic

    activities during the year. Similarly, the number of

    employed persons excluding both the Northern and

    the Eastern Provinces, also marginally decreased

    by 0.5 per cent to 7.14 million in 2009 compared to7.18 million in the previous year.

    Table 4.8 Household Population, Labour Force and Labour Force Participation

    Item2009 (a)

    Household Population (c) 000 Persons 15,048 15,079 16,320 15,353 15,348 15,475 15,415 15,398 16,569 16,493 16,667 16,585 16,578

    Labour Force 000 Persons 7,489 7,569 8,082 7,659 7,469 7,626 7,536 7,572 8,160 7,961 8,122 8,051 8,074Employed 7,042 7,175 7,648 7,251 6,999 7,184 7,125 7,140 7,710 7,465 7,642 7,593 7,602Unemployed 447 394 434 408 470 442 411 433 450 496 480 459 471

    Labour Force Participation Rate ( d) per cent 49.8 50.2 49.5 49.9 48.7 49.3 48.9 49.2 49.2 48.3 48.7 48.5 48.7Male 67.8 67.9 68.0 67.4 66.5 66.3 66.5 66.7 67.2 66.0 66.2 66.5 66.6Female 33.4 34.3 33.0 34.3 32.8 34.3 33.5 33.7 33.3 32.0 33.2 32.9 32.8

    AnnualQ4Q3Q22008 (a)2007 (a)

    Source: Department of Census and Statistics

    Q1

    (a) Data exclude both Northern and Eastern Provinces.(b) Data exclude Northern Province.(c) Aged 10 years and above.(d) Labour force as a percentage of household population aged 10 years and above.

    2008 (b)AnnualQ4Q3Q2Q1

    2009 (b)

    The QLFS conducted by the DCS defines an employed person as one who engaged in some kind of work for pay, profit or family gain (unpaid) duringthe survey period. According to the status of employment, persons working as paid employees, employers, own account workers(self-employed),or unpaid family workers during the survey period were considered as employed persons in the QLFS. This includes persons with a job but not at workduring the survey period. Employees temporarily absent from work due to illness, bad weather or labour disputes are also considered as employed.

    2

    Table 4.9 Employment by Economic Activity

    Sector

    000 Persons Percentage of Total Employment

    Agriculture 2,202 2,344 2,490 2,460 2,227 2,292 2,295 2,319 2,613 2,383 2,426 2,481 2,476 31.3 32.7 32.6 32.5 32.6

    Industry 1,874 1,888 2,005 1,806 1,804 1,833 1,848 1,823 1,894 1,914 1,912 1,921 1,910 26.6 26.3 26.2 25.5 25.1Manufacturing 1,331 1,355 1,414 1,297 1,251 1,308 1,349 1,301 1,349 1,310 1,353 1,380 1,348 18.9 18.9 18.5 18.2 17.7

    Construction (c) 543 533 590 509 552 526 499 522 546 604 559 541 562 7.7 7.4 7.7 7.3 7.4

    Services 2,966 2,943 3,154 2,985 2,969 3,059 2,982 2,999 3,202 3,168 3,304 3,191 3,216 42.1 41.0 41.2 42.0 42.3Trade and hotels, etc. 1,051 1,028 1,095 1,055 996 1,086 1,050 1,047 1,113 1,074 1,172 1,115 1,119 14.9 14.3 14.3 14.7 14.7

    Transport, storage and communication 457 426 448 408 445 407 418 420 430 467 437 447 445 6.5 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9

    Finance, insurance and real estate 215 236 241 243 221 216 204 221 246 229 222 210 227 3.1 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0

    Personal services and other 1,243 1,253 1,370 1,280 1,307 1,349 1,514 1,362 1,413 1,398 1,473 1,419 1,426 17.7 17.5 17.9 19.1 18.8

    Total employment 7,042 7,175 7,648 7,251 6,999 7,184 7,125 7,140 7,710 7,465 7,642 7,593 7,603 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Percentage of labour force 94.0 94.8 94.6 94.7 93.7 94.2 94.5 94.3 94.5 93.8 94.1 94.3 94.2

    2009 (b)2007(a)

    (a) Data exclude both Northern and Eastern Provinces.(b) Data exclude Northern Province.(c) Mining and quarrying, electricity, gas and water categorised under Construction.

    Source: Department of Census and Statistics

    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Annual2008(a)

    2008(b) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Annual

    2007(a)

    2008(a)

    2008(b)

    2009(a)

    2009(b)

    2009 (a)

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    12/16

    90

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    There was a change in the composition of

    employed population, among the major industry

    groups between these two periods. The share of

    the Services sector, in total employment increased

    to 42.3 per cent in 2009 from 41.2 per cent in the

    previous year. The Services sector made the largest

    contribution to the total economic growth during

    the reference period furthering this increase. The

    increase in employment in the Services sector was

    mainly seen in the Personal services, and Trade

    and hotel services categories. Meanwhile, the share

    of employment in the Agriculture sector remained

    unchanged at 32.6 per cent in 2009. However, the

    share of employment in the Industry sector declined

    from 26.2 per cent to 25.1 per cent during the year.

    The drop in contribution of employment in the

    Industry sector to the total employment was due

    mainly to the lower employment in the Manufacturing

    and Construction sectors.

    In terms of employment status, the share of

    the public sector employees, private sector

    employees and unpaid family workers increased

    in 2009, while that of employers and own account

    workers declined, as compared to 2008. The

    employment in the private sector, which had the

    major share of 42.1 per cent as against 15.5 per

    cent in the public sector, continued its dominance in

    generating employment opportunities during 2009.

    Unemployment

    The declining t rend in the unemployment rate

    over the past few years reversed since the fi rs t

    quarter of 2009, due largely to the slowdown of

    economic activities corresponding to the global

    economic crisis. According to the QLFS, the

    unemployment rate increased to 5.8 per cent in 2009

    as compared to 5.4 per cent recorded in 2008. The

    total number unemployed was estimated at 471,000

    for 2009, which was higher than that of 434,000 in

    the previous year. Meanwhile, the unemployment

    rate, excluding both the Northern and the Eastern

    Provinces, also increased to 5.7 per cent from that

    of 5.2 per cent between the two periods. However,

    recovery of the domestic economy, planned and

    ongoing development projects, reconstruction,resettlement and rehabilitation programmes in the

    Northern and the Eastern Provinces, coupled with

    expected global recovery would generate a higher

    level of employment opportunities in 2010. In fact,

    unemployment in the last two quarters of the year

    declined gradually indicating that a recovery is under

    way.

    Table 4.10 Status of Employment

    Per cent

    Source: Department of Census and Statistics(a) Data exclude both Northern andEastern Provinces.

    (b) Data exclude Northern Province.

    2007 (a) 13.8 42.7 2.8 30.4 10.3 100.02008 (a) 14.9 41.1 3.0 30.3 10.8 100.02008 (b) 15.2 41.2 2.9 30.3 10.5 100.02009(Annual)(a) 15.2 42.1 2.7 29.0 11.0 100.0

    1st Quarter 15.5 41.4 2.7 28.4 12.1 100.02nd Quarter 15.1 43.0 2.9 28.6 10.5 100.03rd Quarter 15.7 42.5 2.9 28.1 10.7 100.04th Quarter 14.5 41.6 2.3 31.0 10.6 100.0

    2009(Annual)(b) 15.5 42.1 2.6 29.2 10.6 100.01st Quarter 16.0 41.1 2.6 28.7 11.6 100.02nd Quarter 15.2 43.1 2.9 28.8 10.1 100.03rd Quarter 16.0 42.8 2.8 28.1 10.4 100.04th Quarter 14.8 41.4 2.3 31.1 10.4 100.0

    PeriodEmpl-oyers

    Self-Employed

    UnpaidFamily

    Workers

    TotalPrivateSector

    Employees

    PublicSector

    Employees

    Table 4.11 Public Sector Employment

    Source: Central Bank of Sri Lanka(a) Provisional(b) Central Government, Local Government and

    Provincial Councils(c ) State Corporations, Statutory Boards and State

    Authorities

    2009(a) 2009/2008(a)

    20082007 2008/2007

    Sector

    Government (b) 937,494 990,410 1,047,041 5.6 5.7Semi-government (c ) 259,116 261,318 266,543 0.8 2.0Public Sector 1,196,610 1,251,728 1,313,584 4.6 4.9

    Percentage Change

    Chart 4.2 Trends in Labour Force & Unemployment2005-2009

    Labour Force Participation Rate (Left Axis)

    Unemployment Rate (Right Axis)

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    47.0

    48.0

    49.0

    50.0

    51.0

    52.0

    2005

    2006Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    2007Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    2008Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    2009Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Percent

    Year

    Percent

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    13/16

    91

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    The continuation of youth unemployment,

    especially among educated youth has been a

    matter of concern. This problem was even more

    acute among educated females than educated

    males. In terms of the unemployment rate by level

    of education, the highest unemployment rate of 11.2

    per cent was among those with qualifications of

    GCE (A/L) and above, followed by those with GCE

    (O/L) qualifications (8.5 per cent). The persistent

    mismatches between job opportunities in the market

    and aspirations of the unemployed have partlycaused this problem.

    The unemployment rate was more acute among

    the age group of 15 24 years as observed during

    the last few years. According to the estimates of

    the QLFS, the unemployment rate among this age

    group increased to 21.3 per cent from 18.8 per cent

    in 2008. The unemployment rate of young females

    was 27.9 per cent as compared to that of 17.1 per

    cent among young males.

    Foreign Employment

    Overseas job opportunities continued to be a

    vital source of employment in 2009. The steady

    increase in foreign employment over the past

    several years, contributed significantly to foreign

    exchange earnings while reducing pressure on

    the unemployment problem in Sri Lanka. However,

    departures for foreign employment showed a slight

    slowdown in the first quarter of 2009 but recovered

    from this temporary set back from the second quarter

    of 2009. This decline was due mainly to the reduced

    demand for workers from overseas, as a result of the

    global recession. The total number of departures for

    foreign employment in 2009 was 247,119 compared

    to 250,499 departures in 2008. The decline in

    overseas employment was observed in categories

    of professional, middle level, clerical and related,

    and unskilled workers.

    A number of proactive measures were taken

    by the relevant authorities in 2009, to generate

    more employment opportunities and to create

    a better working environment with enhanced

    social benefi ts for Sri Lankan migrants. Such

    measures include the amendment of the Sri

    Lanka Bureau of Foreign Employment (SLBFE)

    Act No. 21 of 1985, for the purposes of curbing

    illegal practices in the industry and for preventing

    exploitation of migrant workers in the hands of

    different parties including recruitment agents.

    Another important policy implementation by the

    SLBFE during 2009 was the decentralising of SLBFE

    services through the opening of Provincial offices in

    Badulla, Anuradhapura and Kandy. Similarly, under

    the Negenahira Navodaya Programme, SLBFE

    district centres were established in Trincomalee

    and Batticaloa. Further, fixing of minimum salaries

    especially for unskilled categories were also made

    Table 4.12 Unemployment Rate (Unemployed as a percentage of Labour Force)

    Category2009 (a)

    All 6.0 5.2 5.4 5.3 6.3 5.8 5.4 5.7 5.5 6.2 5.9 5.7 5.8

    By GenderMale 4.3 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.7 4.4 3.9 4.3 4.2 4.6 4.4 4.0 4.3Female 9.0 8.0 8.4 7.5 9.1 8.1 8.1 8.2 7.9 9.2 8.6 8.7 8.6

    By Age Group15 - 19 21.6 20.6 20.8 17.8 26.6 20.4 20.3 21.2 18.3 25.0 20.6 19.7 20.920 - 29 15.0 13.2 13.7 14.8 15.5 15.3 14.7 15.1 15.2 15.2 15.5 15.7 15.430 - 39 3.3 3.1 3.1 3.5 4.1 3.9 3.1 3.6 3.3 4.3 3.9 3.3 3.740 and above 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.4

    By Education LevelGrade 4/Year 5 and below 1.3 1.1 - - - - - - - - - - -

    Grade 5-9/Year 6-10 5.2 4.5 4.5 4.3 5.7 5.2 4.4 4.9 4.4 5.7 5.3 4.5 5.0

    GCE(O/L)/NCGE 8.2 7.4 7.8 8.9 8.6 8.5 6.5 8.1 9.3 8.6 9.1 6.9 8.5

    GCE(A/L)/HNCE and above 11.8 9.9 10.5 10.1 10.4 10.3 12.5 10.8 10.6 10.4 10.2 13.4 11.2

    AnnualQ4Q3Q22008(a)2007(a)

    Source: Department of Census and Statistics

    Q1

    (a) Data exclude both Northern and Eastern Provinces.(b) Data exclude Northern Province.

    2008(b)AnnualQ4Q3Q2Q1

    2009 (b)

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    14/16

    92

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    during the year in order to uplift the working standardsof migrant workers. Meanwhile, supervision by Sri

    Lanka missions was strengthened to prevent abuse

    at work sites. Another important action initiated by

    the SLBFE during the year was the organization of

    a comprehensive database to facilitate the various

    stakeholders, including migrant workers and job

    aspirants abroad. These measures, together with

    the expected welfare and promotion programmes

    for migrant workers and enhancement of SLBFE

    services to the Eastern and the Northern parts of the

    island to be implemented in 2010, will have a positive

    impact on foreign employment in the future.

    Foreign employment cont inued to be an

    important and stable source of foreign currency

    inflows to the country. According to the SLBFE,

    the Sri Lankan migrant population is around 1.8

    million. Of the total migrant worker population,

    female migrant workers dominated, registering a

    major share of 70 per cent in 2009. The persistently

    increasing trend observed in male migration over

    the last few years reversed in 2009 and declined to

    48 per cent from 51 per cent of total departures in

    2008. Accordingly, the gender composition of male

    to female departures registered a ratio of 48:52 of

    total migration in 2009 compared to that of 51:49,

    last year. The departure of housemaids increased

    by 5.4 per cent to 113,777 in 2009 from 107,923

    in 2008. Further, the SLBFE continued to explore

    new opportunities in the non-traditional markets

    targeting increased job opportunities in countries

    outside the Middle Eastern region. Total foreignremittances received in 2009 increased by 14.1 per

    cent to US dollars 3,330 million, compared to US

    dollars 2,918 million received during the previous

    year. The ending of the decades-long conflict,

    the efforts to explore new market opportunities in

    non-traditional markets, attempts to streamline

    procedures and implementation of country specific

    training programmes to prepare job aspirants to suit

    labour market requirements abroad would lead to

    further improvement in overseas job opportunities

    and foreign exchange remittances to the country.

    The Middle Eastern region continued to dominate

    the foreign employment market, accounting

    for more than 90 per cent of the total migrant

    workforce, with the majori ty consist ing of

    housemaids. Within the Middle East region,

    Saudi Arabia, Doha Qatar, Kuwait and U.A.E.

    accounted of 82.4 per cent of the total departures

    for foreign employment in 2009. Of these countries,

    departures to Saudi Arabia and Doha Qatar, which

    alone contributed 49.2 per cent to the total migrant

    workers, increased by 15.4 per cent and 10.8 per

    cent, respectively, while that to Kuwait and U.A.E.

    reported declines of 9.7 per cent and 22.5 per cent,

    respectively in 2009 compared to that of 2008.

    The share of housemaids in departures for foreign

    employment increased to 46 per cent in 2009

    compared to 43 per cent in the previous year. The

    Memorandum of Understanding to be entered into by

    the SLBFE with labour receiving countries namely,

    Table 4.13 Departures for Foreign Employment

    Employment2009(a)

    Total Placements 218,459 100.0 250,499 100.0 247,119 100.0By Source

    Licensed Agents 146,515 67.1 160,973 64.3 156,720 63.4Other 71,944 32.9 89,526 35.7 90,399 36.6

    By Gender

    Male 103,482 47.4 128,232 51.1 119,276 48.3Female 114,977 52.6 122,267 48.9 127,843 51.7

    By Manpower Category

    Professional 1,653 0.8 2,835 1.1 2,820 1.1Middle level 3,962 1.8 8,727 3.5 6,392 2.6Clarical & Related 4,551 2.1 6,791 2.7 6,706 2.7Skilled Labour 50,263 23.0 59,718 23.8 61,230 24.8Semi Skilled Labour 3,499 1.6 5,326 2.1 6,036 2.4Unskilled Labour 52,176 23.9 59,239 23.6 50,158 20.3Housemaid 102,355 46.9 107,923 43.1 113,777 46.0

    Per centNumber

    (a) Provisional

    Per centNumber Per centNumber

    2007 2008

    Source: Sri Lanka Bureau of Foreign Employment

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    15/16

    93

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    Kuwait, Oman, J ordan and Lebanon for welfare and

    protection of migrant employees at the work place

    would make foreign employment more attractive.

    In view of enhancing the benefits that the country

    gains from foreign employment, further efforts arerequired to address the issues relating to health

    and occupational safety of migrant workers, while

    also addressing social implications, arising out of

    foreign employment.

    Labour Productivi ty

    Overal l labour product iv i ty cont inued to

    improve in 2009, following the trend observed

    over the last few years. Labour productivity,

    measured in terms of GDP per worker (at constantprices of 2002) increased by 4.2 per cent in 2009

    over the previous year to Rs. 322,200 per worker. The

    increase in productivity was attributed mainly to the

    growth in productivity in the Industry (by 9.4 per cent)

    and Agriculture (by 3.7 per cent) sectors, while the

    productivity in the Services sector reported a marginalincrease of 1.3 per cent during the year. The greater

    mechanisation of agriculture may have contributed

    towards increasing the productivity. However, there

    is further room to enhance the productivity in the

    Agriculture sector, through increasing extension

    services, use of improved seed varieties, technology

    and mechanisation. Further, strengthening of value

    addition agro-based processing industries would

    help to develop the cultivation of food crops on

    a sustainable basis. The continuous increase inlabour productivity is encouraging and would help to

    achieve higher economic growth, while containing

    inflationary pressures in the economy.

    Table 4.14Foreign Employment Departures by

    Destination

    Source: Sri Lanka Bureau of Foreign Employment(a) Provisional

    Share Per centNumberShare Number

    Country

    NumberQatar 39,476 15.7 43,744 17.7 4,268 10.8Saudi Arabia 67,441 26.9 77,826 31.5 10,385 15.4U A E 51,097 20.5 39,586 16.0 -11,511 -22.5Kuwait 46,941 18.7 42,400 17.2 -4,541 -9.7Other 45,544 18.2 43,563 17.6 -1,981 -4.3

    Total 250,499 100.0 247,119 100.0 -3,380 -1.3

    Change(a)2009(a)2008

    Table 4.15Labour Productivity by Major

    Economic Sector

    Sources: Department of Census and StatisticsCentral Bank of Sri Lanka

    (a) Provisional(b) Based on employment data excluding both

    Northern and Eastern Provinces.(c) Based on employment data excluding

    Northern Province.

    2007 2009(a)2008

    GDP at Constant (2002) Prices, Rs.million 2,232,656 2,365,501 2,449,304

    Agriculture 265,870 285,897 294,921Industry 635,199 672,791 701,129Services 1,331,587 1,406,813 1,453,254

    Labour Productivity, Rs.000 per person 317.0 (b) 309.3 (c) 322.2 (c)Agriculture 120.7 (b) 114.8 (c) 119.1 (c)Industry 339.0 (b) 335.6 (c) 367.0 (c)Services 449.0 (b) 446.1 (c) 451.8 (c)

    Table 4.16 Strikes in Private Sector Industries

    Year

    Total

    Man DaysLost

    (a) Includes semi-government institutions and all other private institutions.(b) Provisional

    Source: Department of Labour

    Other(a)Plantation

    WorkersInvolved

    No. ofStrikes

    Man DaysLost

    WorkersInvolved

    No. ofStrikes

    Man DaysLost

    WorkersInvolved

    No. ofStrikes

    2006 19 196,520 4,821,394 34 13,283 72,513 53 209,803 4,893,907

    2007 8 1,468 6,089 17 6,079 36,109 25 7,547 42,198

    2008 34 34,014 41,525 17 3,917 24,130 51 37,931 65,655

    1st - - - 6 1,649 12,359 6 1,649 12,359

    2nd Quarter 4 491 1,037 4 754 1,254 8 1,245 2,291

    3rd Quarter 22 31,648 33,609 4 870 955 26 32,518 34,564

    4th Quarter 8 1,875 6,879 3 644 9,562 11 2,519 16,4412009(b) 2 300 300 6 4,720 7,365 8 5,020 7,665

    1st 2 300 300 3 3,095 6,190 5 3,395 6,490

    2nd Quarter - - - 3 1,625 1,175 3 1,625 1,175

    3rd Quarter - - - - - - - - -

    4th Quarter - - - - - - - - -

    Quarter

    Quarter

  • 7/30/2019 8_chapter_04.pdf

    16/16

    94

    Central Bank of Sri Lanka Annual Report - 2009

    PRICES,WAGES,EMPLO

    YMENTANDPRODUCTIVITY

    4

    Labour Relations and Labour Market

    Reforms

    A welcome development was the decl ine in the

    number of s trikes in the private sector to 8 in 2009

    compared to 51 in the last year. Similarly, the totalman-days lost in 2009 also declined substantially to

    7,665 compared to 65,655 in 2008. The number of

    strikes in the plantation sector declined to 2 in 2009

    compared with 34 in 2008. The total man-days lost

    and workers involved also decreased significantly

    due to improved industrial harmony among the

    employers, workers and trade unions. The number of

    strikes in the rest of the private sector declined to 6

    in 2009 compared to 17 in the corresponding period

    of the previous year. Although the total workers

    involved in these strikes, increased from 3,917

    to 4,720 during 2009, loss of man-days declined

    dramatically by 69 per cent to 7,365 as compared

    to 24,130 in the previous year. This favourable

    development was a combined result of a number of

    factors such as better relationships among parties,

    greater transparency in management practices and

    maintenance of a better social dialogue at the work

    place to improve industrial harmony. The continuous

    maintenance of a sound working environment is

    essential to encourage investment and improve

    productivity in the country.


Recommended