Date post: | 04-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | bruce-w-mckinnon-mba |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 10
7/31/2019 9-1-2012 Appendix B, Pages 1-9 Proof That Hamline Was the 1965 MIAC Tennis Conference Champions.
1/10
AppendixB20112011 DocumentaonDocumentaon 20112011
that resulted in the
changing their historical
Tennis RecordsTennis RecordsTennis Records
to reect that
not Macalesterhad rightly won the tle of
19651965 MIACMIAC Conference Team ChampionsConference Team Champions
Pages to follow numbered 1-9
AppendixB Prepared by Bruce W. McKinnon 1965 RecordsSubmissions
Inial 4-2-2011 Formal 5-16-2011 Rev 1 / 5-20-2011 Rev 2 / 5-22-2012 Rev 3/ 9-01-2012
Holt Tennis Courts
7/31/2019 9-1-2012 Appendix B, Pages 1-9 Proof That Hamline Was the 1965 MIAC Tennis Conference Champions.
2/10
Date: 4-30-2011 (updated 5-17-2012) Page
FACT: Hamlines 1965 Tennis Team was the undisputed 1965 MIACConference Tennis Champion (in addition to 1962 & 1964)
PROBLEM: MIAC records showed Macalesteras the MIAC ConferenceTennis Champions for1965 in error(as of 4-30-2011)
Assignment: Provide PROOF ofHamlines Claim-request MIAC record changePrepared by: Bruce McKinnon (64), 1961-1964 tennis team member
Background: On 3-15
-1920, a formal constitution was adopted and the MinnesotaIntercollegiate Athletic Conference (MIAC) was born with Carleton College, Gustavus
Adolphus College, Hamline University, Macalester College, St. John's University,St. Olaf College and the University of St. Thomas. Concordia College-Moorhead
joined the MIAC in 1921, Augsburg College in 1924 (mens tennis dropped in 1998)and St. Mary's University in 1926. Carleton dropped membership in 1925, rejoining i1983. St. Olaf left in 1950 and returned in 1975. The University of Minnesota Duluthwas a member of the MIAC from 1950 to 1975. Bethel University joined in 1978.|||| SOURCE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ minnesota_Intercollegiate_Athletic_Conference
Determining WHICH team won the MIAC conference title has changed over the yearsInitially, because of the weather, individual college commitments, budgets, and thedifficulty with lining up outdoor tennis courts (in playable condition), it was litterally
impossible for every team in the conference to play one another during the SEASONIn addition, the popularity (or lack thereof) of tennis at the time placed some teamsin the position of not always being able to fill all the team player slots (6 singles and3 doubles). Consequently, most of colleges would send their #1 and #2 singlesand #1 doubles payers to a season ending play-off matchoften referred to as theconference championship. This became readily apparent to me as I spent countlesshours searching the Internet for data and each MIAC college website for tennis teamwin / loss records and/or conference titles. Dependent upon the year, calls I placedto many college alumni offices to check their college annuals only provedthat somecolleges did not even mention their tennis team in their yearbooks or had a photo ofthe team and names of players shown AND that was it (no reference to conferencechampionships or season standings nothing).
Look at the chart to the leftthat I copied from the Gustavus website in April 2011for the period 1920-1969. Source: https://gustavus.edu/athletics/mt/records/miacchamps.cfm Note the references to more than one team name for a year (followed by and S & D singles & doubles). Clearly what is being reported here is the results of the seasoending playoffresults, not the teamseason standings. I highlighted all referencesto Hamline from 1920 to 1969. My interpretation of the roaring 20s is that Hamlinewon both singles and doubles in 1921, but only doubles in 1923 and 1928 at the endof the season playoff. There is NO WAY to even imply any connection to the seasondual match win/loss record during this period. If the Gustavus records (2011) werecorrect, Hamline did not win a playoff tournament in the 30s, 40s or 50s, not one.During the 1960s, 3 Hamline Hall of Famers won 5 singles titles (Hutton = 61 anGustafson = 3 in 62, 63 & 64 and Bob Bigelow= 1968) and both singles & double(StebbinsandMiller) in 1964. There is no reference to the season team win / lossrecord. So again, the RECORD here refers to the year end playoff tournament. FYI:Hamline has never since won a MIAC conference championship during the 70s, 80s90s and 2000s through 2012.
According to Dan McKane (2011), the MIAC Executive Director, the MIAC did nothave an office or Directoruntil 1994until 1994. Prior to that date, athletic records were based oreports submitted by various team coaches, thus he could not guarantee MIAC recordaccuracy. He noted that there were some groups that had investigated the accuracyof existing historical records and supplied updates along with supporting newspaperclippings AND, that there may be some data that may not all have been postedtoMIAC files (e.g., Steve Wilkinson, Gustavus and John Mueller, Augsburg).
Appendix B Prepared by Bruce W. McKinnon Page 1 of9
Hamline University, St Paul, MN 1962, 1964 &1965 Tennis Teams MIAC Tennis Conference Champion
7/31/2019 9-1-2012 Appendix B, Pages 1-9 Proof That Hamline Was the 1965 MIAC Tennis Conference Champions.
3/10
MIACMens Tennis Recordbook
Titles Won or Shared
(1940 to 2010)
Institution No Last Title
Gustavus 39 2010
Macalester 10 1969
St. Olaf 10 1951
St. Thomas 9 1988
Hamline 2 ? 1964 ?
*UM-Duluth
1
1960
Concordia 1 1976
**Augsburg 1 1947
* Le MIAC in 1975 **dropped tennis 1998
Hamline University, St Paul, MN 1962, 1964 &1965 Tennis Teams MIAC Tennis Conference Champions
ConnuedError in MIAC Records: As stated in the PROBLEM noted on the rst page, the MIAC record
book was NOT correct, at least for the year 1965. Hamline rather than Macalester had won
the MIAC conference Championship. The MIACSUMMARY (below) and Wikipedia were also
incorrect. Hamline had won 3 Conference championships since 1940 1962, 1962 and 1965
Error LINK: hp://www.miac-online.org/sports/2007/8/13/mtenrecordbook.aspx?path=mten
PROOF
1. Hamline 1965 Team Trophy: Each member
of Hamlines 1965 team was given a trophy
with a gold plate stang ..
Hamline1965 MIAC Conference Tennis
Champions. College has trophy
2. Hamline 1965 Liner (yearbook): See photo
below with the heading Hamline Captures
1965 MIAC connued
Should be 3and1965
Note: During my tenure at Hamline (tennisseasons 1961 through 1964), team members
were of the opinion that the MIAC Conference
Championship was determined by the season
win/loss record. Connued
Errorshould have been Hamline
Appendix B Prepared by Bruce W. McKinnon Page 2 of9
7/31/2019 9-1-2012 Appendix B, Pages 1-9 Proof That Hamline Was the 1965 MIAC Tennis Conference Champions.
4/10
Hamline University, St Paul, MN 1962, 1964 &1965 Tennis Teams MIAC Tennis Conference Champion
1965 Connued
1965 Season in Perspecve: From season 61 through 64, Hamlines tennis teams had placed 3rd and 2nd once and 1st
twice in the MIAC Conference. So for 1965, it was very clear that Hamline would have a very strong team with plenty of
depth. While the team lost seasoned 4-year leerman Stebbins, McKinnon & Lipelt, the 65team returned 7 leerman
from previous conference championship teams Gustafson, Huss, Miller and the Strohkirch twins (5) from 62 & 64 plu
Wirtanen and Schneider (2) from 64. All of these team players came up under the tutelage of Dr. Lewis who always
molded an unselsh, close knit group. Unfortunately, Dr. Lewis did move on to Dennison University in Ohio at the end o
the 1964 school year, but all returning players had played key rolls in previous championships. Depth is always crical.
Loss of Bob Gustafason: Hamline suered a major blow for the 1965 season with the loss of 3-me conference singles
champion and Hamline Hall of Fame player Bob Gustafson aer only two dual matches. A disabling blood disease ended
his career at Hamline aer 60 wins and 2 losses (Wichita as a Freshman and the second 1965 season dual meet with
Macalester). While Gus had never played doubles at Hamline, he did return to play doubles in one more dual meet in
1965, but subsequently totally quit playing tennis (unl he was 28). He did not play in the 1965 year-end conference
tournament / playo (doctors orders).
Team Season Record Leads to 1965 Conference Championship: Hamline again had a awless season conference record
in spite of the early loss of Gustafson, thanks in part to the constant emphasis Dr. Lewis placed on playing all team
members in-conference and out-of-conference matches. Hamline ended the 1965 season with 8 wins / 0 losses in
conference matches, 10-1 overall. Hamlinewon 10 dual meets (including 2 out-of-conference) and lost one
non-conference match to St Cloud State, very impressive given the loss of Gustafson early in the season.
Appendix B Prepared by Bruce W. McKinnon Page 3 of9
7/31/2019 9-1-2012 Appendix B, Pages 1-9 Proof That Hamline Was the 1965 MIAC Tennis Conference Champions.
5/10
Hamline University, St Paul, MN 1962, 1964 &1965 Tennis Teams MIAC Tennis Conference Champions
Gustafson Archives:Fortunately, Bob Gustafsondid keep his scrap book fromthe good old days and sentme this page. The article onthe right, written by 1964
team member Ford Spalding,was taken from the Hamlinecollege newspaper (Oracle)at the time and discusses the1964 team championship.
However,the tennis articlecut out of the 1965 HamlineOracle appearing belowindicates that Hamline hadrepeated its conferencetitle in 1965, similar to 1964,
and that this was the thirdteam title in 4 years.
1965 Continued
Appendix B
Page 4 of9Prepared by Bruce W. McKinnon
7/31/2019 9-1-2012 Appendix B, Pages 1-9 Proof That Hamline Was the 1965 MIAC Tennis Conference Champions.
6/10
Hamline University, St Paul, MN 1962, 1964 &1965 Tennis Teams MIAC Tennis Conference Champions
ProofHamline 1965 MIAC ConferenceTennis Champions (continued)
From the Bob Gustafson archives (scrapbook)
The arcle on the right, taken from the Hamline
Oracle, discusses the Dr. Lewis coaching win / loss
record form 1961 through 1964 (highlighted). On
the le, well known Pioneer Press sports writer
Bob Shabert clearly states that Hamline won the
Conference tennis tle and Macalester was 2nd.
Appendix B
Page 5 of9Prepared by Bruce W. McKinnon
7/31/2019 9-1-2012 Appendix B, Pages 1-9 Proof That Hamline Was the 1965 MIAC Tennis Conference Champions.
7/10
Hamline University, St Paul, MN 1962, 1964 &1965 Tennis Teams MIAC Tennis Conference Champions
Also see comments on
NEXT PAGE
This page contains a COPY of two separate e-mails sent to me by former Gustavu
tennis coach, Steve Wilkinson, responding to 2 of my inquiries about the accuracy
ofMIAC records relave to the 1965 MIAC Conference Championship. Steve
is perhaps the most revered tennis coach in US history due to his phenomenal
39 year coaching record at Gustavus. I needed someone to weigh in on this issue
whos credenals were unquesonable. Steve was the perfect candidate.
E-mail #1 (below) was Steves rst response aer checking some of his records
following our rst conversaon. But, as he suggested, I needed to see whatMacalesters records indicated. And I did.
E-mail #2 to the lewas Steves response to receiving the (next) PAGE that I had
obtained from the Macalester Alumni Oce and e-mailed to him. Shown on the
next page is the tennis page from their 1966 yearbook which is self explanator
Steve Wilkinsonrered
GustavusWinningest
Tennis Coach in
Collegiate history
39 years1970-2009
Appendix B Prepared by Bruce W. McKinnon Page 6 of9
# 2
# 1
7/31/2019 9-1-2012 Appendix B, Pages 1-9 Proof That Hamline Was the 1965 MIAC Tennis Conference Champions.
8/10
Hamline University, St Paul, MN 1962, 1964 &1965 Tennis Teams MIAC Tennis Conference Champions
Gustavus Coach Steve Wilkinson 2nd e-mail follow-up: Steve was right. What was needed to theorecally put this queson (who was
MIAC Conference Tennis Champion in 1965) to BED, was an acknowledgement of some sort from Macalester that would eliminate any
debate. I contacted the Alumni Relaons Oce at Macalester and spoke with Associate Director, Damond Dean (M 91). I asked that
he pull both the 1965 and 1966 MAC Yearbooks and turn to the tennis pages. He did. He said there was nothing but pictures in the
1965 yearbook (sort of like Hamlines Liner for 1958-1960), but the 1966 Yearbook spoke specically to the 1965 tennis year (see
below). I asked Daymond to scan the page and e-mail me a .pdf version (he did) and I forwarded the document to Steve Wilkenson.
Steves response (see top e-mail on previous page) was immediate that other informaon I sent to him (see previous pages) PLUS
.vericaon from Macalester records proves that Hamline was the 65 MIAC Tennis champion, not Macalester. However, the
following page provides the clincher (3 colleges now agree that Hamline was the Conference Champion). Connued on next page
Tribute to Steve Wilkinson: Yes, a coach can make a dierence ! Wilkinson arrived at Gustavus as a religeon professor in 1970 . He was asked if
he would be willing to voluntarily coach the tennis team. Steve had played collegiate tennis at the University of Iowa where he nished second at
#1 doubles at the Big Ten Championships as a senior. The rest is history. Steve became the winningest coach in the history of collegiate mens tennis
(Divisions I, II, and III, and NAIA) over 39 years. Wilkinsons teams won 35 MIAC tles and 2 NCAA Division III tles (1980 and 1982). His players claim
6 naonal doubles and 4 naonal singles tles. He coached 46 players to 87 ITA All -America honors, 103 players to 226 All-Conference honors, and 5
CoSIDA Academic All-Americans. His teams achieved an overall record of 929-279 (.768%) and a MIAC mark of 334-1 (.997%). Wilkinson also played
compeve tennis for many years aer college and ranked #1 in the US in the 45, 50, 55 and 60 and over divisions. He represented the US in the Dub
Cup, Perry Cup and Austria Cup compeon winning the world championship in Montevideo, Uruguay in 1989 and nished second in Berlin, Germany
in 1992. Steve was inducted into the Iowa Tennis Hall of Fame (1974), Northern Tennis Associaon Hall of Fame (1983) and the US Tennis Associaon
Missouri Valley Hall of Fame (1999). Steve rered in 2009 as Gustavus Tennis coach due to an illness. But, he and his wife Barbara connue to work
with the Tennis and Life Camps (TLC) which he foundedthe largest tennis camp in one locaon in the US. AND, with no strings aached, Steve help
ME (a total stranger) to establish that Hamline was in fact the MIAC 1965 Tennis Conference Champions. Thank YOU Steve. See Sources / LINKS belowhp://makeyourlifecount.blog.gustavus.edu/2010/08/20/steve-wilkinson-tennis-and-life/ and hp://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/
Appendix B Page 7 ofPrepared by Bruce W. McKinnon
http://makeyourlifecount.blog.gustavus.edu/2010/08/20/steve-wilkinson-tennis-and-life/http://makeyourlifecount.blog.gustavus.edu/2010/08/20/steve-wilkinson-tennis-and-life/http://makeyourlifecount.blog.gustavus.edu/2010/08/20/steve-wilkinson-tennis-and-life/http://makeyourlifecount.blog.gustavus.edu/2010/08/20/steve-wilkinson-tennis-and-life/http://makeyourlifecount.blog.gustavus.edu/2010/08/20/steve-wilkinson-tennis-and-life/http://makeyourlifecount.blog.gustavus.edu/2010/08/20/steve-wilkinson-tennis-and-life/http://makeyourlifecount.blog.gustavus.edu/2010/08/20/steve-wilkinson-tennis-and-life/http://makeyourlifecount.blog.gustavus.edu/2010/08/20/steve-wilkinson-tennis-and-life/http://makeyourlifecount.blog.gustavus.edu/2010/08/20/steve-wilkinson-tennis-and-life/http://makeyourlifecount.blog.gustavus.edu/2010/08/20/steve-wilkinson-tennis-and-life/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://www.northern.usta.com/News/2010/2010_04/Steve-Wilkinson-ITA-Hall-of-Fame/http://makeyourlifecount.blog.gustavus.edu/2010/08/20/steve-wilkinson-tennis-and-life/7/31/2019 9-1-2012 Appendix B, Pages 1-9 Proof That Hamline Was the 1965 MIAC Tennis Conference Champions.
9/10
Hamline University, St Paul, MN 1962, 1964 &1965 Tennis Teams MIAC Tennis Conference Champions
Direct LINK: http://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook.htm
Home/ Saint John's University Archives/ SJU History/ Books about St. John's/ Scoreboard:
Scoreboard: A History of Athletics at Saint John's Universitywritten and compiled by Dunstan Tucker, O.S.B. and Martin Schirber, O.S.B
Introducon-Foreward-Acknowledgements
Chapter I: The Early Daysp. 1-9
Chapter II: Footballp. 9-76
Chapter III: Basketballp. 77-128
Chapter IV: Baseball
p. 129-
199
Chapter V: Trackp. 200-256
Chapter VI: Cross-Countryp. 257-276
Chapter VII: Tennisp. 277-320
Chapter VIII: Wrestling p. 321-348
Chaptver IX: Hockeyp. 349-374
Chapter X: Golfp. 375-390
Chapter XI: Soccerp. 391-402
Chapter XII: Rugbyp. 403-411
Chapter XIII: Swimmingp. 412-415
Chapter XIV: Gymnascsp. 416-422
Indexp. 423-444
Full documentfor keyword searching
4.
Now read the 2nd, 3rd and 4th paragraphs of the Saint Johns document under 1965, or as noted below:
The team started out well with a series of four consecutive victories, then had a few disappointing triangulars, but in the last partof the season was strong enough to compete for the conference crown at Macalester.Nevertheless, Hamline won the MIACtitle. In a spirited review of the season, Arth, who wrote as well as he played tennis, commented:"Even as I look back onour past season, I still cannot possibly see how Hamline won the thing. And now that the season is over, I still feel thatman for man we were the best team in the conference.(Record,May 26, 1965).The conference record for the season was 6-2, with a third place ranking in the MIAC.
There was little reported about the MIAC tournament, won by Hamline.Rain interrupted the finals, which had to be
completed in the Macalester field house. Tom Arth, top-seeded St. John's player, lost in the finals to Shipman of Macalester.
John VandeNorth won two rounds before being defeated in the semi-finals. Michael Musty, a tenacious competitor, won first
place in the consolation match.
SUMMARY / CONCLUSION / ACTIONQueson: What / Who supports Hamlines Claim that they, rather than Macalester, won the 1965 MIAC Tenni
Conference Championship and that MIAC records (website and Wikipedia) should be changed ?
Hamline University is in possession of a 1965 tennis trophy
Members of the 1965 Team were each given a trophy
Hamlines yearbook (Liner) states Hamline was the champ
Hamlines bullens (Oracle) states Hamline was the champ
The St. Paul Pioneer Press states Hamline was the champ
Macalesters yearbook states they were NOT the champs
St Johns publicaon Scoreboardstates Hamline was champ
Steve Wilkinson, rered Gustavus Tennis coach / historian
and winningest coach in college history believes Hamline
won the 1965 Tennis MIAC Conference championship
Conclusion: Hamline University WON the 1965MIAC
Conference Championship in Tennis!
ACTION: In April 2011, we asked the MIAC to correct their
records accordingly (and they did)See Website page at: hp://www.miac-online.org/sports/2007/8/13/mtenrecordbook.aspx?path=mten
Instrucons / direcon to relevent informaon
1. Click onChapter VII - TENNIS (pages 227-320). .
2. Scroll downto boom and click on "Chapter VII connued".
3.
Scroll downto 1964, read second paragraph or, as quoted below:
Prior to 1964, a tennis championship was determined entirely on the outcome of th
conference tournament in singles and doubles.According to the new ruling, however,
the winners of singles and doubles were simply declared the individual champions of the
conference, whereas the team championship was to be determined by the number of seas
victories and the state meet. There was no chancefor quibbling in 1964, however, for
Hamline won both the team title by an 8-0 record in the seasonal meets, and won bo
the singles and doubles championships in the tournament.St. John's was runnerup
with a record of seven wins and only one loss(toHamline).As was expected, Hamline andSt. John's dominated the MIAC tournament. St. John's Art Grady won two matches before
losing in the semi-finals to Hamline's Gustafson, the eventual winner in the singles finals.
M
I
A
C
TENNIS- Minnesota Intercollegiate Athlec Conference
19402011 Championship Determinaon Protocol
Period / Years Dual Season End Duals +
From To Matches Tournament Tournamen
1 1940 1952 X
2 1953 1964 | X S+D-1pt/win
3 1965 1966 X
4 1967* 1968 50% 50% X
5 1969* 1970 51% 49% X
6 1971* 1972 50% 50% X
7 1973* 1983 X
8 1984* 1996 20 pts-2/m 72 pts X T=92
9 1997* 2002
*
100 pts-10/m 72 pts X T=172
10 2003 2006 X
11 2007 2011 X
*Nineightedtournaments began in 1967 to 2002
Source: 5-30-2011 Coach Steve Wilkinson, Gustavus
Appendix B Page 8 of 9Prepared by Bruce W. McKinnon
http://www.csbsju.edu/http://www.csbsju.edu/http://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardIntro.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardIntro.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardIntro.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardIntro.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardIntro.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardIntro.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter1.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter1.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter2.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter2.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter3.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter3.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter4.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter4.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter5.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter5.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter6.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter6.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter6.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter6.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter7.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter7.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter8.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter8.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter9.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter9.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter10.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter10.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter11.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter11.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter12.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter12.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter13.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter13.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter14.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter14.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardIndex.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardIndex.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/Documents/SJU%20Archives/Scoreboard.pdfhttp://www.csbsju.edu/Documents/SJU%20Archives/Scoreboard.pdfhttp://www.csbsju.edu/Documents/SJU%20Archives/Scoreboard.pdfhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardIndex.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter14.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter13.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter12.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter11.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter10.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter9.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter8.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter7.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter6.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter5.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter4.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter3.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter2.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardChapter1.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns/ScoreboardBook/ScoreboardIntro.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory/BooksaboutStJohns.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives/SJUHistory.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/SJU-Archives.htmhttp://www.csbsju.edu/7/31/2019 9-1-2012 Appendix B, Pages 1-9 Proof That Hamline Was the 1965 MIAC Tennis Conference Champions.
10/10
Its Official !!Its Official !!Its Official !!
The 19The 19The 19656565 Hamline Tennis Team is theHamline Tennis Team is theHamline Tennis Team is the MIACMIACMIAC Tennis Conference ChampionsTennis Conference ChampionsTennis Conference Champions
MIAC Records Updated 5-4-2011
5-4-2011 E-mail from MIAC
From: Matt Higgins [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 10:24 AM
To: 'Stephanie Harris'; Bob Beeman ([email protected])
Cc: 'Bruce McKinnon'; 'Dan McKane'
Subject: 1965 MIAC Championship
Hello Steph, Bob and Bruce,
I want to thank all of you especially Bruce for your me and eort on verifying and trying to recfy the MIAC mens tennis
history regarding the 1965 championship. Based on evidence provided by Bruce, Hamline and vericaon from Macalester,
it is the MIACs ocial decision that Hamline University was indeed the 1965 MIAC mens tennis champion.
As of this morning, I have updated the MIAC Mens Tennis Recordbook on the MIAC Web site to reect this, and have adjusted
each teams total tles and last tle to reect the change as well. You can view that updated page Here:
hp://www.miac-online.org/sports/2007/8/13/mtenrecordbook.aspx
I am saving all documentaon from this process to back up the MIACs decision to list Hamline as the MIAC Champion for 1965, and
this summer I plan to add language to our Web site to clarify the changing nature in which the champion was determined. Thanks
again for all of your work on this and for your help to ensure the MIAC records are accurate. Congratulaons to Bruce and Hamlinefor the 1965 tle, and best of luck moving forward with your Hall of Fame nominaons.
Ma Higgins
Assistant to the Execuve Director
Minnesota Intercollegiate Athlec Conference
E-mail: [email protected]
Oce: 651-644-3965
Cell: 612-237-8237
Fax: 651-647-6422
Web: www.miac-online.org
Hamline was the winner ofHamline was the winner of33 MIACMIAC Conference ChampionshipsConference Championships
196219621962 196419641964 196519651965
Appendix B Prepared by Bruce W. McKinnon Page 9 of9
http://www.miac-online.org/sports/2007/8/13/mtenrecordbook.aspxhttp://www.miac-online.org/sports/2007/8/13/mtenrecordbook.aspxhttp://www.miac-online.org/sports/2007/8/13/mtenrecordbook.aspxhttp://www.miac-online.org/sports/2007/8/13/mtenrecordbook.aspxhttp://www.miac-online.org/sports/2007/8/13/mtenrecordbook.aspx