Date post: | 21-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 3 times |
9-1
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
Capability
TheQualityImprovementModel
Use SPC to Maintain Current Process
Collect & Interpret
Data
Select Measures
Define Process
IsProcessCapable
?
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
Capability
IsProcessStable
?
Investigate & Fix
Special Causes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Improve Process Capability
Purpose:Determine/identify fundamental changes to the process to improve capability.
9-2
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
Capability
Improving Stable Processes
Common causes of variation usually cannot be reduced by trying to explain the difference between high and low points when a process is stable.
All of the data, not just the high and low points, are relevant to further analysis.
Aspects of the system that are always present will need to be changed to improve common cause variation.
Stable systems usually require managerial attention for improvement. Fundamental changes in the system are often required.
Source: Brian Joiner
9-3
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityOrder Entry Process
Week123456789
1011121314151617181920
Total
# Errors15221810139
2712242288
26162010169
1520
320
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
5 10 15 20
Avg=16.0
LCL=4.0
UCL=28.0
Week
Numberof Errors
Control Chart
It has been decided that this process requires further improvementHow do we go about it?
9-4
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityOrder Entry Errors by Type
Incorrect Account Number 72
Error in Order Amount 168
Inadequate Billing Information 17
Priority Code Not Checked 25
Incomplete Shipping Instructions 14
Other Errors 24
TOTAL 320
Description Number of Errors
Error in Order
Amount
Incorrect Account Number
Priority Code Not Checked
Inadequate Billing
Information
Incomplete Shipping
Instructions
Other Errors0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Type Error
Pareto Chart
9-5
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityOrder Entry ProcessResults of efforts to reduce errors in order amount.
Week212223242526272829303132333435
Total
# Errors16101368
10654615012
93
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
5 10 15 20
Avg=16.0
LCL=4.0
UCL=28.0
Week
Numberof Errors
Control Chart
25 30 35
Limits based on first 20 weeks of data
Process Improvements Begin
9-6
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityOrder Entry Errors by Type
Incorrect Account Number 42
Error in Order Amount 8
Inadequate Billing Information 7
Priority Code Not Checked 17
Incomplete Shipping Instructions 9
Other Errors 10
TOTAL 93
Description Number of Errors
Incorrect Account Number
Error in Order
Amount
Priority Code Not Checked
Inadequate Billing
Information
Incomplete Shipping
Instructions
Other Errors0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Type Error
Pareto Chart
9-7
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityImproving Stable Processes - Instrument Measures Common Problems with Stable Processes
Lower Spec Upper Spec Lower Spec Upper Spec
Off Target Excess Variation
Or, Both
9-8
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
Capability
Improving Stable Processes - Instrument Measures Common Improvement Techniques
Targeting Processes - Designed Experiments Change process variables in a planned manner to determine the effects of the variables on level and variability. Design of Experiments Course
Reducing Variation - Use Process Knowledge Break out process steps (Process Map and C&E information) Isolate sources of variability (Exploratory Data Analysis or
Designed Experiment) Separate out common causes (stratification – Applied
Statistical Methods Course) Exploratory Data Analysis (Applied Statistical Methods
Course) Multi-Vary Studies in Six Sigma Analysis on existing process data Done on key variables identified in C&E or FMEA
9-9
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityBreaking Out Process Steps
Rating of Importance to
Customer10 1 9 9 5 8
1 2 3 4 5 7
Bre
ak %
Melt T
em
p
Bott
le O
utp
ut
Cla
rity
Weig
ht
Wall
Variation
Total
Process Step Process Input
Melt Resin Resin 9 9 3 9 9 9 324Blow Bottle Mold Design 9 0 9 9 0 9 324
Extrude Parison Programing 3 3 9 0 9 9 231Extrude Parison Die Tip Temp 3 3 3 9 3 9 228
Blow BottleMold Water Temp
9 0 9 3 0 0 198
Blow BottleWater Volume/Cooling Rate
9 0 9 3 0 0 198
Extrude Parison Head Design 3 9 3 3 3 9 180Extrude Parison Tooling 3 3 3 3 3 9 174
Blow Bottle Pinch Design 9 0 9 0 0 0 171Melt Resin Barrell Temp 3 9 9 1 3 3 168Melt Resin Screw Speed 3 9 9 1 3 3 168Melt Resin Screw Design 3 9 9 1 1 1 142
Blow Bottle# of Mold Cooling Zones
9 0 3 0 0 0 117
Tail DetabTime from extraction to Detab
9 0 3 0 0 0 117
Use C&E matrix as a place to start data collection and analysis.
9-10
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityIsolating Sources of Variability
“Polymer Manufacturing Process”
Conduct a study to evaluate measurement variability of b*.Two b* measurements are done on each sample.
Possible Actions: Concentrate on improving the measurement process (Previous Module)
Duplicate Measurements on Same Sample
Sample
b*3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
First Measurement
Second Measurement
9-11
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilitySeparating Out Common Causes
“Shipping Process”
International orders <10% of total orders
International orders 10-20% of total orders
International orders >20% of total orders
Run Chart
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Proportion Wee
k
Late
Possible Actions: Improve process for shipping of international orders.
9-12
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityHypothesis: Are the Labs that Measure Color the Same?
9-13
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityMinitab: Comparing Two or More Samples
•Open Mintab Software•Open Color Round Robin Data in the Mintab Datasets Folder and follow the directions in the notes below.
Lab
b*
TEDKuantanHART
-1.0
-1.2
-1.4
-1.6
-1.8
-2.0
-2.2
Interval Plot of b* vs Lab95% CI for the Mean
Note: The ASM course spends more time discussing Planning, Data Collection, Analysis and Interpretation from experiments similar to the one above.
9-14
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityComparing Two or More Labs
Follow the instructions in the notes to perform the comparisons.
9-15
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityComparing Two or More Labs …Individual 95% CIs For Mean Based on
Pooled StDev
Level N Mean StDev ---+---------+---------+---------+------
HART 24 -1.7658 0.2235 (-*--)
Kuantan 41 -1.3346 0.1369 (-*)
TED 37 -1.0568 0.0846 (-*-)
---+---------+---------+---------+------
-1.75 -1.50 -1.25 -1.00
Pooled StDev = 0.1476
Tukey 95% Simultaneous Confidence Intervals
All Pairwise Comparisons among Levels of Lab
Individual confidence level = 98.09%
Lab = HART subtracted from:
Lab Lower Center Upper --+---------+---------+---------+-------
Kuantan 0.3408 0.4312 0.5216 (--*--)
TED 0.6169 0.7091 0.8012 (--*--)
--+---------+---------+---------+-------
-0.30 0.00 0.30 0.60
Lab = Kuantan subtracted from:
Lab Lower Center Upper --+---------+---------+---------+-------
TED 0.1981 0.2779 0.3576 (-*--)
--+---------+---------+---------+-------
-0.30 0.00 0.30 0.60
9-16
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityHypotheses: Does Film IV, CHDM and DEG Effect Shrink Stress?
9-17
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
Capability
•Open Minitab Software.
•Open Shrink Stress in the Minitab Datasets Folder.
•Follow the instructions below to create fitted line plots of the data.
Minitab : Analyze Relationships Between Two Continuous Variables
9-18
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityAnalyze Relationships Between Two Continuous Variables
Film IV
Avg S
hrink
Str
ess
:
0.700.690.680.670.66
11.5
11.0
10.5
10.0
9.5
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
S 1.04108R-Sq 8.9%R-Sq(adj) 2.3%
Fitted Line PlotAvg Shrink Stress: = - 9.12 + 26.81 Film IV
Film DEG
Avg S
hrink
Str
ess
:
14131211109
11.5
11.0
10.5
10.0
9.5
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
S 0.805410R-Sq 45.5%R-Sq(adj) 41.6%
Fitted Line PlotAvg Shrink Stress: = 15.10 - 0.5321 Film DEG
Film CHDM
Avg S
hrink
Str
ess
:
272625242322212019
11.5
11.0
10.5
10.0
9.5
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
S 1.01422R-Sq 13.5%R-Sq(adj) 7.3%
Fitted Line PlotAvg Shrink Stress: = 12.58 - 0.1600 Film CHDM
What conclusions do you make from the analysis?
9-19
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityDesigned Experiments
Making planned and deliberate changes to the process input variables to determine the effect on the output variables.
Outputs Variables
Process
Products or Services
103.4 92.6 2345
Properly designed experiments can yield useful cause-effect information.
Input Variables
9-20
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
Capability
IV CHDM DEG0.75 20 90.71 23.6 11.20.743 23.6 120.731 25.9 10.80.741 24.2 13.40.743 24.2 13.60.732 23.8 10.80.742 19.5 10.30.756 24.3 13.50.71 23.7 11.10.729 23.6 12.10.708 18.9 11.40.733 19.4 10.40.723 23.4 13.50.727 19.4 9.40.702 19.6 11.5
Designed Experiments - Example
Objective: Choose a formulation for a new EMBRACE product.
These 16 conditions were done on a manufacturing line in Kingsport.
Material was taken to customers and run.
Customer fitness for use measures will aid in determining new EMBRACE fromulation.
9-21
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
Capability
Horiz Vert
Film IVFilm DEGFilm CHDMTemp
Factor 0.657 9.3 24.2 95
Current X
Pred Formula 10s TD ShrinkagePred Formula 10 s MD ShrinkagePred Formula Avg Shrink StressPred Formula Glycol Sum
Response-5.140107-10.335256.4315566
28.8
Contour81.756686-9.9958258.0112861
33.5
Current Y 70 . . .
Lo Limit . .
7.1 35
Hi Limit
24.2
Film
CH
DM
19.5
Pred Formula Avg Shrink Stress
75
7065
60
8.2
8
7.8
7.6
7.4
7.2
7
6.8
6.6
6.4
9.3 Film DEG 13.4
Contour Profiler
Profiler
Designed Experiments - Example
9-22
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
CapabilityReview
•Improving Stable Processes takes intervention
•All of the data is important, not just the "Special" Causes
•Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) on historical data•Use the C&E Matrix and the FMEA to determine where to start•Look for trends•Look for differences among qualitative variables (instruments, etc.)•Information will be used in control plan
•Variance Component Breakdowns (Test and Process)
•Designed Experiments on Key Inputs•Key Inputs determined by C&E, FMEA and EDA•Information will be used in control plan
9-23
Improve Process
Capability
Improve Process
Capability
1.)Your Catapult Team should complete page 12 of the “Catapult Process” handout.
Limit yourselves to 30 minutes for this exercise.
Exercise