+ All Categories
Home > Documents > 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

9644 Heap Booklet(1)

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: brianinfreedom
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 28

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    1/2811

    Chart authors:

    TerrenceMcDonough

    JasonLoughrey

    Booklet authors:

    TerrenceMcDonough

    JasonLoughrey

    Project supported by:

    ICTU(IrishCongressofTradeUnions)

    TASC(athinktankforactiononsocialchange)

    SSRC(SocialSciencesResearchCentre,NUIGalway)

    TASC2009

    Hierarchy of Earnings, Attributes and Privilege Analysis

    THE H.E.A.P. CHART

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    2/28

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    3/2803

    Reducing the income gap

    Workablepoliciesaimedatreducingthegapbetween

    highandlowincomesconstituteasecondstrategy

    thathasbeenusedeffectivelyinothercountriesto

    promoteeconomicequality.Therearetwoapproaches

    thatcanbeusedtoreduceincomedifferentials.The

    rstinvolvesredistributingincomefromrichtopoor

    householdsthroughprogressivetaxationofincome

    andwealth,whilethesecondinvolveshavingsmaller

    differencesinincomesbeforetaxesandbenets,which

    meansthereislessneedforredistribution.Sweden

    achievesgreaterincomeequalitythroughredistributionwhile,inJapan,incomeequalityisachievedbyhaving

    smallerincomedifferentialsbeforetaxes.

    Inthemediumtolongterm,advancingincomeequality

    wouldinvolveavarietyofmeasures,rangingfrom

    addressingtheexcessivelevelsofexecutivepayand

    bonusesenjoyedbysomeofthoseatthetopofthe

    H.E.A.P.,toincreasingtheincomelevelsofthoseat

    thebottomoftheH.E.A.P.bysettingaminimum

    incomeoor,whichensuresthatno-onehasan

    incomelessthan60percentofthenationalmedian

    income.Preventingexcessivelyhighincomesandconcentrationsofwealthatthetopisasimportant

    aspullinguptheincomesatthebottom.

    Investment in education

    Athirdandcrucialpolicyareaimpactingonincome

    equalityinvolveseducation.Theanalysisclearly

    demonstratestherelationshipbetweeneducation

    andincomelevels,wherebythosewithhigher

    levelsofeducationhavetheopportunitytoearn

    higherincomes,andthosewithlowereducation

    levels(primaryandsecondary)havesignicantly

    lowerlevelsofincomeandareatmuchgreater

    riskofpoverty.

    Irelandcontinuestospendproportionatelylesson

    education(4.7percentofGDP)whencomparedtothe

    averagespendacross30OECDcountries(5.7percent

    GDP).TheOECDhasalsofoundthatIrelandspends

    relativelylittleonearlychildhooddevelopmentand

    educationcomparedtoothercountries,andthatthe

    percentageofIrishchildrenlivinginpoorhouseholds

    (16.3percent)issignicantlyabovetheOECDaverage

    (12.4percent).

    Investmentinearlychildhooddevelopmentand

    educationintherstsixyearsoflifereduces

    inequality.Inpurelyeconomicterms,spendingin

    thisareaisoneofthebestinvestmentsacountry

    canmake.Overall,greaterinvestmentineducation,

    andespeciallyearlychildhoodeducation,isneeded

    ifincomeinequalityistobeaddressed.Aswith

    socialprotection,increasedinvestmentineducation

    wouldrequireprogressivetaxationtogetherwitha

    broadeningofthetaxbase.

    Thereisnoshortageofpolicyoptionsthatcanbeused

    toaddressincomeinequalityandthethreeexamplesoutlinedabovedemonstratesomepracticalstepsthat

    canbetakentoaddressthesymptomsandthecauses

    ofincomeinequality.

    Alltheevidenceshowsthataddressingincome

    inequalityisessentialifwewanttoachieveeconomic

    equality,whichisofcentralimportancetoourfuture

    wellbeing.Thepolicyoptionswechoosetoadvance

    thisaimarelessimportantthanwhetherornotwe

    ultimatelysucceedintransformingIrelandfroma

    societysufferingundertheweightofinequalitytoone

    characterisedby(andgainingfrom)equality.WehopetheH.E.A.P.Chartwillinformthedebateoninequality

    and,inparticular,willbeusedtostimulatediscussion

    onhowwecanachievegreaterequality.

    TASCandICTUwouldliketothankProfessor

    TerrenceMcDonoughandJasonLoughreyfromthe

    SocialSciencesResearchCentreatNUIGalwayfor

    undertakingthisprojectandbringingittolife.

    DavidBegg(ICTU)

    PaulaClancy(TASC)

    November2009

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    4/2804

    02.Foreword

    05.IntroductionandPurpose

    07.WhatistheH.E.A.P.Chart?

    HowtousetheChart

    Datasource

    Occupationaldenitions

    10.InequalityinIreland

    Measuresofinequality

    Povertyrates

    Hasinequalityworsened? Wealthinequality

    16.WhyInequalityMatters

    TheSpiritLevel

    InequalityandIrelandscurrentcrisis

    20.TheH.E.A.P.Chart:InterpretationandAnalysis

    Theeffectofgovernmentbenetsandtaxation

    oninequality

    TheroleofSocialWelfare(SW)paymentsin

    addressingpoverty

    Comparisonofincomesformenandwomen Theeffectofeducationoninequality

    26.Conclusions

    27.Appendix:SuggestionsforWorkshopUse

    28.Acknowledgements

    TABLE

    OF

    CONTENTS

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    5/2805

    Weallliveinunequalsocietiesinanunequalworld.Whatstandsoutmost

    sharplyismassiveinequalityinthelifeprospectsoftherichandthepooran

    inequalitywhichimpactsonarangeofoutcomesincludinglifeexpectancy,

    health,happiness,educationandincome.

    Inequalitiesareembeddedintheeconomicstructuresof

    societyinareassuchasownership,wealth,income,taxation,

    employment,health,housingandeducation.Althoughmany

    peopleareawarethateconomicinequalitiesexist,somebelieve

    thatthesolutionistoimprovethewell-beingofthepoorestinsociety,withoutaddressingtheissueofequalityitself(i.e.

    thegapbetweenrichandpoor).However,recentresearchby

    RichardWilkinsonandKatePickett,publishedintheirbook

    TheSpiritLevel,indicatesthatwhileitisimportanttoimprove

    thepositionoftheleastwell-offinsociety,thelevelofequality

    alsomatters.Inthewordsofthebookssubtitle:moreequal

    societiesalmostalwaysdobetter.

    Manypeoplendthattheyassociateintheirworkingandpersonalliveswith

    othersatroughlythesamelevelofincomeandsocialstatus.Itiseasyto

    assumethatthemajorityofpeopleinthecountryshareyourincomelevel.Groupsoutsideourownincomelevelbeithigh,low,ormiddlingtendtobe

    lessvisible,andthereforeeasilyforgottenorignored.Inordertogetthebig

    pictureofequalityorinequalityinIrishsocietyitisimportanttostepoutside

    ourownpersonalexperience.WehopethattheHierarchyofEarnings,Attributes

    andPrivilege(H.E.A.P.)Chartandanalysiswillhelpusallseethatbigpicture.

    ThepurposeoftheH.E.A.P.Chartandthisbookletistoprovidesomeofthe

    basicfactsrelatingtoincomedistributioninIreland,drawingon2006data.

    Theanalysisprovidesaclearandeye-openingpictureofIrelandssocio-economic

    structureintermsofincomedistribution,occupationandhouseholdtype

    (e.g.female-headedhouseholds,couplesetc).

    Onceweknowtheoverallsituation,we

    canstartdebatingwhetherthecurrent

    stateofincomedistributionishealthyor

    desirable.Andifweconcludeitisnt,we

    mustbeginanewdebateabouthowwe

    addressincomeinequalityandhowwecanachieveajustsociety.

    Foldedinsidethiscompanionbooklet,theH.E.A.P.Chartshowscolour-codedguresallowingus

    tolocatehouseholdtypesandoccupationswithintheincomedistribution.Thisbookletprovides

    aclearexplanationonhowtousetheH.E.A.P.Chart,andputsahumanfaceonthedrystatistics

    underpinningdiscussionsoninequality.

    INTRODUCTION

    AND

    PURPOSE

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    6/2806

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    7/28

    H.E.A.P.standsfortheHierarchyofEarnings,Attributes

    andPrivilege.Earningsareusedtolocatehouseholds

    onthechartfromthebottomtothetop.Attributes

    includeemploymentstatus,occupation,andfamilytype.

    Privilegeiswherehouseholdsstandinrelationtoone

    anotheraretheyatthetop,middleorbottomofthe

    incomeheap?

    WhiletheH.E.A.P.Chartoffersanat-a-glanceviewof

    incomedistributioninIreland,italsomeritscloserstudy.

    Inadditiontoinformationabouthouseholdincome,

    theChartcontainsinformationaboutthestructureof

    Irelandsfamiliesandtheoccupationsoftheadultsin

    thefamily.

    07

    EachiconontheChartrepresents2,800Irish

    households.Becauseofthis,somefamilieswithlesscommonoccupationsandhouseholdtypeswillnot

    showupontheChart.Ifyoundthisisthecasefor

    yourhousehold,youcanchoosetheclosestmatching

    iconatyourincomelevel.

    Thedataisdrawnfromsurveyscarriedoutin2006.

    Theyear2006waschosenbecauseitrepresents

    thelatestavailabledata.Itwasalsothelastyearof

    theboom,somuchhaschangedsince.Theongoing

    recessionhasaffectedincomesatalllevels.Thus,

    whileincomesacrosstheboardarereduced,the

    structureofoverallincomeinequalitystillapplies.TheChartwillbeupdatedwithnewdataasit

    becomesavailable.

    YoucanndyourhouseholdslevelontheChartby

    addinguptheincomesofeachindividualandthen

    addinggovernmentbenetsreceived.Wehave

    usedpeoplesheadlineannualincometomake

    thiseasier.Wecouldhavecorrectedfortaxation

    andotherfactorswhichinuencetakehomepay,but

    thiswouldhaveaddedcomplications.Whenadding

    upyourhouseholdincome,use2006gureswhere

    possibleandmakesuretoincludethefollowing:

    The incomes of all adults

    Theincomesofallchildrenunder16shouldbe

    included.Adultchildrensincomesshouldbe

    includediftheyareunder20,000.Unmarriedadults

    inthehouseholdwhoearnmorethanthisamount

    areconsideredindependentandarerepresented

    asseparatehouseholds.Benetsinkindfromyour

    employer,likeacompanycar,shouldbeincluded.

    Perhapssurprisingly,thestatisticsincludeemployers

    PRSIinemployeeincome.Consequently,ifyouhaveanemployerwhopaysPRSIyoumustaddthisamount

    toyourincometondyourplaceonthechart.Ifyou

    madelessthan18,512youmustadd8.5percent

    astheemployerhasalowerPRSI.Forinstance,if

    youmade10,000thiswouldbe850.Ifyoumade

    18,000thiswouldbe1,530.Ifyoumademorethan

    18,512youmustadd10.75percent.Thiswouldbe

    1,075forevery10,000.

    Pensionsshouldbeincluded.

    Propertyincomelikerentorsharedividendsshouldbeincluded.

    Youshouldalsoincludeanymoneyyoumadefrom

    thesaleofanyassetslikepropertyorshares.

    Government benefts

    Theseinclude:

    unemploymentbenets;

    oldagebenets;

    childbenets;

    housingallowances;and

    education,survivors,sickness,carersand

    disabilitybenets.

    Mostfamilies(95percent)willbeabletousethe

    largechartshowinghouseholdswithincomesof

    134,000orless.Householdincomesupto330,000

    areincludedinthesmallerchart.Ifthischartwere

    printedtothesamescaleasthebiggerchart,the

    highesticonwouldbetwometresupthechart.

    Incomesabovethislevelaretoodispersed,andthe

    householdstoofewinnumber,tocreateanicon,

    exceptforoneat600,000.Thisiconwouldbeacouplewithtwomanagerial/professionalincomes.

    WHATISTHE

    CHART?

    H.E.A.P.

    HowtousetheChart

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    8/2808

    Example 1:

    Acouplewithtwochildren.Themanisawelderearning

    27,000.Thewomanisasalesclerkearning18,000.

    WelderscomeunderCraftandrelatedoccupations.

    SalesclerkscomeunderSalesoccupations.

    Thewelderwouldhavetoadd10.75percentfor

    employersPRSI.

    27,000x1.1075=29,902.50

    Thesalesclerkwouldhavetoadd8.5percentfor

    employersPRSI.

    18,000x1.085=91,530

    Childbenetfortwochildren(2006rate)is3,600.

    29,902.50+19,530+3,600=53,032.50

    Thiscoupleshouldgotothelineoficonsbetween

    52,000and54,000andlookforacoupleiconwith

    acolourcodedividedbetweenCraftandrelated

    andSales.

    Example 2:

    Asinglewomanwithonechild,workingasahairdresserearning25,000.Heroccupationwouldcomeunder

    Personalandprotectiveservices.

    Shewouldhavetoadd10.75percentfor

    employersPRSI.

    25,000x1.1075=27,687.50

    Shewouldthenadd1,800childbenet(2006rate).

    27,687.50+1,800=29,487.50

    Sheshouldgothelineoficonsbetween28,000and

    30,000andlookforasinglefemaleiconwithdependents

    colourcodedforPersonalandprotectiveservices.

    Example 3:

    Asingleretiredmanonthecontributorygovernment

    pension.Hewouldbereceivingjustover10,000in

    pensionpayments.

    Heshouldgotothelineoficonsbetween10,000and

    12,000andlookforasinglemaleiconcolourcoded

    forRetired.

    SINGLE MALE SINGLE FEMALE FEMALE PLUS

    DEPENDENT

    COUPLES

    To fnd your households position on the Chart

    First,ndthelevelofyourfamilysannualhousehold

    income.Thenlookalongtherowtondtheicons

    whichmostcloselycorrespondtoyourhousehold

    type.Wehaveincludedthefollowingfamilytypes:

    Thecouplescategoryincludesbothcoupleswithandwithoutchildren.Non-retiredcoupleswithoutchildren

    weretoofewinnumbertoincludeasaseparate

    category.Thesameconsiderationappliedtosinglemen

    withchildren.Althoughwewouldhavelikedtoexplicitly

    recognisethisfamilycategory,theytendedtodisappear

    intheaggregationnecessarytocreatetheicons,and

    hencewerenotincludedasaseparatecategory.We

    werealsounabletodistinguishbetweensame-sex

    couplesandsinglepeoplesharingaccommodation.

    Same-sexsingleadultssharingaccommodationare

    usuallyrepresentedasseparatesingleadulthouseholds.

    Finally,ndtheiconwhichmostcloselymatchesthe

    occupationsoftheadultsinyourhousehold(each

    iconiscolour-codedtodenoteoccupation).Wehave

    distinguishedthefollowingoccupationalcategories:

    Managerialandprofessional

    Clericalandsecretarial

    Craftandrelated

    Sales

    Other

    Personalandprotectiveservices

    Plantandmachineoperatives

    Unemployed,peoplewithdisabilitiesandstudentsRetired

    Farmers

    Homeduties

    Whereacouplehasdifferentoccupations,theiconis

    splitbetweenthetwocolours.Afulldescriptionofthe

    occupationsisfoundonthenextpage,includingmany

    examplesofjobtitlesincludedineachcategory.

    Thefollowingillustrateshowtolocatedifferent

    householdsontheChart.

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    9/289

    ThedatafortheChartissourcedfromtheIrishSurvey

    ofIncomeandLivingConditions(SILC).Thedatafrom

    theIrishSILCfeedsintotheEU-SILC,whichistheEU

    referencesourceforcomparativestatisticsonincome

    distribution,livingconditionsandsocialexclusionat

    Europeanlevel.

    ThepurposeofSILCistoallowtheMemberStatesand

    theEuropeanCommissiontomonitornationaland

    EUprogresstowardskeyEUobjectivesintheareas

    ofsocialinclusionandsocialprotection.EU-SILCisa

    multi-dimensionalsurveyfocusedonincomebutalsocoveringtime,housing,materialdeprivation,labour,

    health,demographyandeducation.AlltheEUcountries

    andafewothersnowconductcomparableSILCsurveys.

    Plant and machine operatives

    Power-productionoperators;watertreatmentoperators;assembly-lineoperators;industrial-robotoperators;chemical-productsmachineoperators;printing-machineoperators;sewing-machineoperators;food-processingmachineoperators;andvehicledrivers.

    Unemployed, people with disabilities and students

    Thiscategoryincludespeoplewhoareunabletoparticipateintheactiveworkforceduetodisability;thosewhoarecurrentlyunemployed,butavailabletotakeupemployment,andfull-timestudents.

    Retired

    Thiscategorycomprisesthosewhohaveretiredonagegrounds.

    Farmers

    Cropgrowers;vegetablegrowers;horticulturalists;dairyandlivestockproducers;poultryproducers;farmlabourers;forestryworkers;andsheryworkers.

    Home Duties

    Thiscategoryincludespeoplewholookafterchildren,olderpeopleand/orpeoplewithdisabilitiesonanunpaidbasis,andthosewho,becauseofhomeduties,arenotavailabletotakeuppaidemployment.

    Managerial and proessional

    Managers,directorsandotherexecutives;scientistsandengineers;healthprofessionals;teachers;businessprofessionals;lawyers;writers;andtechnicians.

    Clerical and secretarial

    Secretaries;clerks;cashiers;banktellers;travelagents;receptionists;telephoneoperatorsandcall

    centreoperators.

    Crat and related

    Builders;plumbers;electricians;painters;welders;motormechanics;handicraftworkers;foodprocessingworkers;textileworkers;garbagecollectors;constructionandmaintenancelabourers.

    Sales

    Models;shopsalespersons;shopdemonstrators;marketsalespersons;andstreetvendors.

    Personal and protective services

    Travelguides;waitersandbartenders;child-careworkers;personalcareworkers;hairdressers;

    beauticians;undertakers;re-ghters;policeofcers;armedforces;domestichelpersandcleaners;caretakers;messengersandporters.

    TheSILCsurveydividesoccupationsintonine

    categories.Theseare:managersandadministrators,

    professionals,associateprofessionalandtechnical,

    clericalandsecretarial,craftandrelated,personal

    andprotectiveservices,sales,plantandmachinery

    andother.Inaddition,thosenotinworkarecounted

    invecategories:unemployed,thoseonhomeduties,

    students,peoplewithdisabilitiesandretired.

    Toincludeallofthesecategoriesseparatelywould

    createtwoproblems.Firstly,somecategoriesarenot

    numerousenough,andwouldtendtodisappearwhenfamiliesareaggregatedintoicons.Secondly,including

    allcategorieswouldcreatetoomanycoloursonthe

    chart.Wehavecombinedthemanagerial,professional

    andassociateprofessionalcategoriesintoone

    managerialandprofessionalcategory.Wehavealso

    combinedtheunemployed,peoplewithdisabilitiesand

    studentcategories.

    Examplesofthetypesofjobswithineachcategoryare

    listedbelow.

    Datasource Occupationaldenitions

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    10/2810

    Denmark

    Sweden

    AustriaNetherlands

    Finland

    Germany

    France

    Belgium

    Luxembourg

    Spain

    Italy

    UK

    Ireland

    Greece

    Portugal

    WecanseefromthisthatIrelandisamongthecountrieswithrelativelyhighlevels

    ofinequality.Irelandsinequalitymeasureis33percenthigherthanDenmarkorSweden.

    Anothermeasureofinequalityistheincomequintileshareratio.Thisinvolvestaking

    theshareofincomeofthetopone-fthofthepopulationanddividingitbytheshare

    ofincomereceivedbythebottomone-fth.Thehigherthisnumber,thehigherthe

    levelofinequality.

    INEQUALITY

    IN IRELAND

    TherstmeasurementwewillexamineistheGiniCoefcient.Thismeasurementassesses

    inequalitybycomparingasituationinwhichthereisperfectequality(everyoneina

    countryhasanequalincomeshare)tooneofperfectinequality,whereonepersonhas

    100percentoftheincomeandeveryoneelsehasnothing.PerfectequalitygivesaGiniCoefcientofzero.PerfectinequalitygivesaGiniCoefcientof100.TheclosertheGini

    Coefcientisto100,thehigherthelevelofinequality.TheEU-SILCsurveyin2006found

    thatIrelandhadaGiniof32.Wecantgetagoodsenseofwhatthismeansuntilwe

    compareittotheGiniofothercountries.

    ItisoftenobservedthatIrelandhasarelativelyhighlevelofincomeinequality.

    WecaninvestigatethisbycomparinglevelsofinequalityinIrelandwithlevels

    inothercomparablecountries.Forthispurpose,wewilllookatIrelandin

    relationtotheothermembersoftheEU15(membersoftheEuropeanUnion

    beforetherecentenlargements).

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

    Measuresofinequality

    GiniCoefcientoftheEU15

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    11/2811

    Athirdwaytoassessinequalityistoexaminetheat-riskof-povertyrate.Thismeasure

    looksatthepercentageofindividualswhoreceive60percentorlessofthemedian

    income.Ifyouweretolistalltheincomesinthecountryfromthehighestdowntothelowest,medianincomewouldbetheonepreciselyinthemiddle.Exactlyhalfofthe

    countrywouldbericherthanthemedianincomeandexactlyhalfpoorer.Ifyouhave

    anincomebelowthree-fthsofthemedian,youarejudgedtobeatriskofpoverty.

    Denmark

    Sweden

    Finland

    Austria

    Netherlands

    France

    Germany

    Belgium

    Luxembourg

    Ireland

    Spain

    UKItaly

    Greece

    Portugal

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

    Again,Irelandisinagroupof

    relativelyunequalcountries.

    Povertyrates

    0 5 10 15 20

    Netherlands

    Sweden

    Denmark

    Austria

    Finland

    France

    Luxembourg

    Germany

    Belgium

    Portugal

    Ireland

    UK

    Spain

    Italy

    Greece

    Onceagain,Irelandishighup

    theinequalityleaguetable.

    AtriskofpovertyratefortheEU15(fromEurostat2007)

    IncomequintileshareratiosfortheEU15

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    12/2812

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    13/2813

    Thefollowingexampleillustrateshowameasureof

    inequality,liketheratioofthetopandbottomincomes,

    mayfailtocaptureariseininequality.Supposea

    countryhadtwocitizens.Thepoorcitizenmakes5andtherichcitizenmakes50.Theratiooftheirincomes

    isonetoten.Therichcitizenis45aheadofthepoor

    citizen.Supposeaftertenyearstheirincomesdoubleto

    10and100.Theratiooftheirincomesisstilltenbut

    therichcitizenisnow90aheadofthepoorcitizen.The

    gapbetweenthemhaswidenedbuttheratiomeasure

    remainsthesame.Thisiswhathashappenedover

    theCelticTigerperiod.Theincomeofallgroupshas

    increasedroughlyproportionately,andhencetheGini

    Coefcientandthequintileshareratiodontchange

    much.Ontheotherhand,thegapbetweenhighincomes

    andlowincomeshaswidenedconsiderablyinIreland.

    Theusualstatisticalmeasuresofinequalitydontcatch

    thisdevelopment.

    TherehasbeenagreatdealofdebatearoundwhetherinequalityinIrelandhasworsened

    duringtheCelticTigerperiod.Manyobservershavenotedthatthestandardmeasures

    ofinequality,liketheGiniCoefcientandtheincomequintileshareratio,whilerelatively

    high,didnotbecomeworsebetween1987andthelatestgures.Theirconclusionisthat

    inequalitydidnotincreaseinIrelandinrecentyears.

    Thisconclusionisnotvalid,however.

    TheproblemwiththestandardargumentisthatmeasuresliketheGini

    Coefcientandthequintileshareratioaredesignedtobeindependent

    oftheoveralllevelofwealthandincomeinthecountry(technicallyspeaking,thisisknownasmeaninvariance).Thisisausefulquality

    forameasuretohavewhencomparingtwodifferentcountries.Ifyou

    wanttocompareinequalitywithinChadtoinequalitywithinGermany,

    themeasureshouldnotbealteredjustbecauseChadispoorerthan

    Germanyoverall.Thesemeasuresfalldown,however,whencomparing

    thesamecountryduringdifferenttimeperiods.

    Onthenextpagethegraphdemonstratesthechanges

    inincomedistribution,showingthedistributionofincome

    in1987,1994,2001and2005.

    Hasinequalityworsened?

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    14/2814

    Wealth,ortheaccumulatedresourcesownedbyhouseholds,isas

    importantafactorineconomicinequalityasincome.Althoughthere

    arearangeofwealthcategories,commonformsincludebankdeposits,

    stocksandbonds,commercialproperty,investmentfundsandpension

    funds;thevalueofthefamilyhomeisalsosometimesincluded.

    Netwealthsubtractsthelevelofdebtfromtotalwealth.

    StatisticsaboutwealtharehardtocomebyinIreland.TheBank

    ofIrelandpublishedastudyofwealthin2007,givingusguresfor

    2006.Theyfoundthatthegrosswealthofthetoponepercentofthe

    populationwasaneven100billion.Thistoponepercentowned

    20percentofthewealthinIreland.Whenthevalueofresidential

    propertyisexcluded,thegureownedbythetoponepercentrises

    to34percentormorethanathird.

    Thered1987lineshowsadistributionwiththebulkofincomesbunchedcloselytogetherand

    thereforerelativelyequal.Onlyarelativelysmallnumberofhouseholdsmakesubstantially

    morethanthisgroupandconsequentlythereisntafattailstretchingtotheright.Bycontrast,

    thegreen2005lineshowsfewerincomesbunchedtogetherandthepopulationisspreadout

    alongthehorizontalsidewithmanyatbothhighandlowincomes.The1994and2000linesshowthemovementawayfromthemoreequaldistributionof1987.

    Equivalisedweeklydisposableincome1987-2005

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    00 50 10 0 1 50 200 25 0 3 00 35 0 4 00 450 50 0 550 600 6 50 700 7 50 8 00 850 9 00 9 50 1,000

    percentageoftotal

    weeklyincome

    1987

    1994

    20002005

    Wealthinequality

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    15/2815

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    16/2816

    Index of:

    Lifeexpectancy

    Math&literacy

    Infantmortality

    Homicides

    Imprisonment

    Teenagebirths

    Trust

    Obesity

    Mentalillness

    includingdrug&

    alcoholaddiction

    Socialmobility

    WilkinsonandPicketthavefoundthat,ifyouexamine

    thevariousdimensionsofhealthandarangeofsocial

    problems,youdiscoverthatlessequalsocietieshave

    moreproblemsandpoorerrecords.Thisistrueeven

    inrichersocieties.

    WilkinsonandPicketthaveconstructedanindexto

    measuresocietiesperformanceintheareasofhealthandsocialproblems,goingdownfrombettertoworse.

    Themeasureincludesthingslikementalillness,life

    expectancy,infantmortality,educationalperformance

    andmurderrates.Theyndthatincreasingthelevel

    ofnationalincomeperpersonintherichercountries

    doesntimprovethescoresignicantly,butincreasing

    thelevelofequalitydoesimproveperformance.

    Conversely,acountrysperformancedeclinesas

    inequalityrises.Thefollowingpicturetellsthisstory.

    Itisoftenarguedthatinequalityisnottheissue.

    Proponentsofthispositioncontendthatthe

    problemistheabsolutelevelofdeprivationofthe

    leastwelloff.Ifwecanraisethewell-beingofthe

    poorestinsociety,orsotheargumentgoes,what

    differencedoesitmakethatothersarestillvery

    muchbetteroff?Recentresearch,however,indicatesthat,whiletheabsolutelevelofwell-beingoftheworst-offis

    certainlyimportant,thelevelofequalitymattersaswell.AsthesocialscientistsRichardWilkinsonandKatePickett

    observeinthesubtitleoftheirbook,TheSpiritLevel,moreequalsocietiesalmostalwaysdobetter.

    Healthandsocialproblemsareworseinmoreunequalcountries

    Worse

    Better

    IncomeInequality

    Source:Wilkinson&Pickett,TheSpiritLevel(2009)

    Low High

    USA

    NewZealand

    Australia

    ItalyCanada

    Spain

    Sweden

    Japan

    Switzerland

    Netherlands

    Portugal

    UK

    Greece

    Ireland

    France Austria

    Denmark

    Finland

    Norway

    Germany

    Belgium

    www.equalitytrust.org.uk

    Indexofhealthandso

    cialproblems

    WHY INEQUALITY

    MATTERS

    TheSpiritLevel

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    17/2817

    Thischartdemonstratesthelevelsoftrustacrossarangeofcountries.Eachcountrysdoton

    thelefttorightscaleshowsitsrelativeincomeinequality.Thefurthertotheright,thehigherthe

    incomeinequality.Thedotsverticalpositionshowshowwellthatcountryisdoingintermsof

    theleveloftrust.Thehigherthedot,thehighertheleveloftrust.Thelineslopingdownshows

    thatascountriesgofromlowtohighlevelsofinequality,onaveragethelevelsoftrustgodown.

    Therearethosewhoarguethatinequalityisnecessarytopromoteinvention,innovationandcreativity,

    contendingthatahighlevelofinequalityisessentialtoincentiviseahighlevelofinternational

    competitiveness.This,however,doesnotseemtobethecase.Onthecontrary,inequalityreduceschildrensperformanceinschools,whileWilkinsonandPicketthavefoundthatmoreequalsocieties

    producemorepatentsforinventions.Moststudiesndthatmoreequalsocietiesgrowfaster.

    Therearemanyreasonsforthis.Studiesshowthatinequalitycreates

    highlevelsofstress,largelyasaresultofunhealthycompetition

    andstatusanxiety.Importantly,overalllevelsofsocialtrustgodown

    asinequalitygoesup.ThefollowinggraphshowsWilkinsonand

    Pickettsndingsaboutinequalityandtrust.

    Thischartdemonstratestheextentofhealthandsocialproblemsacrossanumberofcountries.Eachcountrys

    dotonthelefttorightscaleshowsitsrelativeincomeinequality.Thefarthertotheright,thehighertheincome

    inequality.Thedotsverticalpositionshowshowwellthatcountryisdoingintermsofhealthandsocialproblems.

    Thehigherthedot,theworsetheperformance.Thelineslopingupshowsthatascountriesgofrom

    lowtohighlevelsofinequality,onaveragetheirabilitytoavoidhealthandsocialproblemsgetsworse.

    Levels of trust are hiher in more equal rich countries

    Sweden

    Norway

    Portugal

    Singapore

    CanadaGermany

    Spain IrelandItaly

    UKGreece

    0

    Low HighIncomeInequality

    Source:Wilkinson&Pickett,TheSpiritLevel(2009)

    Mostpeoplecan

    betrusted(%a

    greeing)

    20

    40

    60

    80

    Netherlands

    Denmark

    Finland

    NewZealand

    Switzerland Australia

    Belgium

    Japan

    Austria

    FranceIsrael

    USA

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    18/2818

    InequalityandIrelandscurrentcrisis

    Inequalityisalsoaprimefactorintherecession.Atthetimeofwriting,Ireland

    isfacingfourinterlinkedcrises.Weareinthemidstofaninternationalcrisis,

    anancialorbankingcrisis,ascalorgovernmentdecitcrisis,andan

    unemploymentcrisis.

    Highlevelsofinequalitytendtowaste

    thetalentsofalargeproportionofthe

    population.

    Theinternationalcrisiswascausedbymanyfactors,butprominent

    amongthemwasahighlevelofinequalityintheUnitedStates,which

    ledtostagnantconsumerdemandandhighlevelsofindebtedness.Facingreducedlevelsofdemand,investmentwassluggish,andthose

    withmoneyturnedincreasinglytonancialspeculation.Financial

    speculationwasfurtherdrivenbythedemandbylowerincomegroups

    forsub-primemortgages,andbythebloatedbonusesawardedto

    bankersforshort-termperformance.Thisbubbleeventuallyburst

    precipitatingawidercrisis.

    HereinIreland,inequalitycontributedto

    highlevelsofindebtedness,becausepeople

    borrowedtokeepupwithhigherincome

    consumptionlevelsinhousing,carsand

    othergoods.Thehighincomesofbankers

    andpropertydevelopersdivertedinvestment

    intopropertyratherthanmoreproductive

    uses.ThisdynamichelpedcreateIrelands

    ownpropertybubble.Tomaintainpersonal

    consumption,allincomegroupssupported

    ataxsystembasedonpropertytransactions

    ratherthanincome-anunsustainable

    systemwhichhasnowcollapsedcreating

    abudgetcrisis.Theinternationalcrisis,

    thenancialcrisis,thebudgetcrisis,

    andhighlevelsofpersonaldebthaveall

    contributedtoacrisisofdemandinIreland,reducingeconomicactivityandincreasing

    unemployment.

    WilkinsonandPickettconclude:

    Ifyouwanttoknowwhyonecountrydoesbetterorworse

    thananother,therstthingtolookatistheextentof

    inequality.Thereisnotonepolicyforreducinginequalityin

    healthortheeducationalperformanceofschoolchildren,

    andanotherforraisingnationalstandardsofperformance.

    Reducinginequalityisthebestwayofdoingboth.

    InequalityandIrelandscurrentcrisis

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    19/2819

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    20/2820

    Ireland 2001 2004 2006 2007

    PovertylevelsbeforeSocialWelfare(%) 35.6 39.8 40.3 41.0

    TheroleofSocialWelfare(%) -13.7 -20.4 -23.3 -24.5

    PovertylevelsafterSocialWelfare(%) 21.9 19.4 17.0 16.5

    Thistableshowsthatpovertylevels(beforeSocialWelfare)inIrelandincreasedfrom

    35.6percentto41percentfrom2001to2007.ThetablealsodemonstratesthatSocial

    Welfareplayedacriticalroleinreducingpovertylevelsfrom21.9percentin2001to

    16.5percentin2007(theseguresarenotadjustedforpurchasingpower).Irelandhas

    alsoenteredintoarecessionsincethesegureswerepublished,andwearelikelyto

    seepovertylevelsincreasedramatically,notonlyasaresultofgrowingunemployment,

    butalsoduetogrowingpressureonSocialWelfarerates.

    IrelandssocialprotectionratesarenotgenerousbyEuropeanstandards.In2006,

    spendinginthisarearepresented18.2percentofGDP,whichcomparesbadlywith

    countriessuchasFrance(31.1percent)andSweden(30.7percent)andevencountries

    suchasGreece(24.2percent)andPortugal(25.4percent).ThereisadirectcorrelationbetweenspendingonSocialWelfareandincomeequality:countriesthatspendlesson

    SocialWelfarehavehigherlevelsofincomeinequality.

    WhilewewerenotsurprisedbytheoverallshapeoftheChart,twothingsstoodout

    whenwehadlaidtheiconsout.InthehorizontaldimensionoftheChart,thelongest

    lineisthatjustabovethe10,000line.Thisisbecausepensionsandsocialwelfare

    paymentspreventpeoplefromfallingfurtherdowntheChart.Thisisincontrastto

    placesliketheUnitedStateswherethiskindofooronincomedoesntexist.Inthe

    verticaldimension,itisstrikingthatthemanagerialandprofessionaloccupation

    categoryistheonlyonetoweaveitswayfromnearthebottomoftheCharttothe

    verytopoftheheap.

    Socialprotectionprovidesanimportantsafetynetforindividualsandhouseholdswho

    areatriskofpoverty,andincludesarangeofsocialwelfarepaymentsandbenetsthat

    coverareassuchasillness,disability,oldage,unemploymentandhousing.

    Poverty rates

    TheincomesofallgroupsinIrelandhaveincreasedoverthelastnumberofyears,

    andthiscouldleadonetoassumethatifeveryonesincomehasincreasedpovertylevels

    musthavefallen.However,thisisnotthecase.Thetablebelowdemonstrateshow

    povertylevelsincreasedandtherolesocialwelfarepaymentsplayinaddressingpoverty.

    INTERPRETATION

    AND ANALYSIS

    THE H.E.A.P.

    CHART:

    Theeffectofgovernmentbenetsandtaxationoninequality

    TheroleofSocialWelfare(SW)paymentsinaddressingpoverty

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    21/2821

    WeretheprinciplesofsocialinsuranceinIrelandtobedismantled,thiswouldhave

    adetrimentaleffectnotonlyonincomeinequalitybutonindividualsalreadyplacedin

    aprecarioussituation.Itwouldexposemorehouseholdstotheriskofpoverty,whichwould

    haveamyriadofnegativeeffectsontheindividualandadverseconsequencesforsociety.

    TheeffectsofsuchamodelcanbeseenintheUnitedStateswherecitizensarenotafforded

    minimumsocialprotections,theresultsofwhichareinstarkcontrasttoourown.

    ThechartbelowrelatesthelevelofinequalityasmeasuredbytheGiniCoefcientwith

    thepercentageofGDPwhichisspentonsocialprotectionintheEU15countries.

    Eachcountrysdotonthelefttorightscaleshowsitslevelofsocialprotectionspending.

    Thefarthertotheright,thehigherthespendingasapercentageofGDP.Thedotsvertical

    positionshowshowwellitisdoingregardingthelevelofinequality.Thehigherthedot,the

    higherthelevelofinequality.Thelineslopingdownshowsthatascountriesgofromlowto

    highlevelsofsocialprotectionspending,onaveragethelevelsofinequalitygodown.For

    instance,Irelandhasalowlevelofsocialspendingat18.2percentofGDPandarelativelyhighlevelofinequalitywithaGiniCoefcientof32.Swedenhasalevelofsocialspendingat

    30.7percentofGDPandacorrespondinglylowlevelofinequalitywithaGiniCoefcientof24.

    40

    38

    36

    34

    32

    30

    28

    26

    24

    22

    200 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

    Portugal

    Greece

    Ireland Italy

    Spain

    Luxembourg Belgium

    Germany France

    Finland

    Austria

    Denmark

    Netherlands

    Sweden

    Higherlevelsofsocialspendingareassociatedwithlowerlevelsofinequality

    PercentageofGDPspentonsocialprotection

    GiniCoefcien

    t

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    22/2822

    Thechartshowswomendominatingthelowerincomes

    whereasmenarebetterrepresentedathigherincome

    levels.Allthose16oroverareincluded.

    Womensincomein2006wasaroundtwo-thirdsofmensincome.Afteradjustingfordifferencesinhoursworked,

    womenshourlyearningswerearound86percentofmens.

    Theproportionofmenatriskofpovertyin2007,afterpensions

    andsocialtransfers,was15percentcomparedto19percent

    ofwomen.

    Inadditiontoinequalityamongthegeneralpopulation,thereisstillinequalitybetween

    menandwomen.

    Thefollowinggurecomparestheincomesofmenandwomen.

    18

    16

    14

    12

    10

    8

    6

    4

    2

    00 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1, 000 1,100 1,200 1, 300 1, 400 1,500 1,600 1, 700 1, 800

    Male

    Female

    percentageoftotal

    weeklydisposableincome

    Comparisonofincomesformenandwomen

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    23/2823

    Youcanseethatthelowerincomesaredominatedbythose

    withoutauniversityqualicationwhiletheoppositeisthe

    caseforhigherlevels.Onlythose25andoverareincluded.

    Thechartdemonstratesthecentralroleplayedbyeducational

    opportunitiesindeterminingsubsequentincomethe

    educationpremium.

    Thefollowinggraphcomparestheincomesofthosewithauniversityqualicationand

    highertothosewithoutsuchaqualication.

    Non-univ

    Univ

    20

    18

    16

    14

    12

    10

    8

    6

    4

    2

    01 00 2 00 3 00 4 00 5 00 6 00 7 00 8 00 9 00 1 ,0 00 1, 10 0 1 ,2 00 1, 30 0 1 ,4 00 1, 50 0 1 ,6 00 1, 70 0 1 ,8 00 1, 90 0 2 ,0 00

    percentageoftotal

    weeklydisposableincome

    Theeffectofeducationoninequality

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    24/2824

    Thetableontheleftgivesthemedian

    grossincomebyeducationlevelachieved.

    Themedianisthemiddleincomeifall

    incomesinthecategorywerelisted

    fromtoptobottom.Equivalisedmeansa

    correctionhasbeenmadeforthesizeof

    thehousehold.

    Thetableontheleftshowshowhigher

    educationallevelsreducetheriskof

    poverty.Disposableincomerefersto

    incomeleftforspendingafterdeductions

    suchastaxes.

    Highest Percentage of Equivalised

    education level household gross income

    achieved heads median ()

    Primary/noformal 30 13,489

    Lowersecondary 18 19,742

    Uppersecondary 17 24,933

    PostLeavingCert 9 26,433

    Thirdlevelnon-degree 9 31,812

    Thirdleveldegreeorabove 17 45,707

    Highesteducationlevelachievedbyhouseholdhead

    At risk (%)

    Primary/noformal 33.6

    Lowersecondary 23.3

    Uppersecondary 15.1

    PostLeavingCert 11.6

    Thirdlevelnon-degree 8.7

    Thirdleveldegreeorabove 3.2

    Atriskofpovertyi.e.percentageofhouseholdsbelow60percentofequivalisedmediandisposableincome

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    25/2825

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    26/2826

    Thisinsightisparticularlydisturbingforusin

    Ireland.Irelandhasformanyyearsbeenamong

    themostunequalofthedevelopedsocieties.Our

    boom,nowapparentlyover,raisedtheoveralllevel

    ofincomeinIrishsociety.Unfortunately,however,

    studiesshowthatwedidnotusethebenetsof

    theboomtoreducethelevelofinequality.Onthe

    contrary,thedistancebetweenthoseatthetopand

    thoseatthebottomhaswidened.Thiswideninginequalityhasplayedaroleinourcurrentcrisis

    byencouragingtheexpansionofunsustainable

    consumptionlevelsanddebt,whiletaxrateshave

    beencutbelowthosewhichcouldsustaindecent

    publicservices.

    Wemustnotaskanimaginaryinternationalbond

    marketwhatkindofsocietyweshouldhave.We

    shouldinsteadsetaboutbuildingthesocietywe

    want.Agoodsocietywillhaveamuchhigherlevelof

    incomeequality,andthesocialsolidaritythatgoes

    withit,asoneofitsessentialfoundationstones.

    WehopethattheH.E.A.P.Charthashelpedto

    illuminateanimportantaspectoflifeinIreland

    today.Sinceweeachoccupyonlyoneplaceinthe

    heap,itisdifculttoknowabouttheconditionsfaced

    bythosebothaboveandbelowus.Further,studies

    likethosecarriedoutbyWilkinsonandPickettin

    TheSpiritLevelhaveestablishedthattheshapeof

    theheapisimportantaswellasthelevelofincomeit

    represents.Moreequalsocietiesdobetter.

    CONCLUSIONS

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    27/2827

    Exercise 1

    Placetheposterontheooroftheclassroom

    inacorneroftheroomoppositethewindows.

    Haveoneparticipantstand3.6metresfromthe

    bottomofthepostertorepresentthetopiconat

    anincomeof600,000.Haveanotherstudent

    standoutsidethewindowonapremarkedspot

    6.3metresawaytorepresentaCEOincomeof

    1,000,000.Youmightalsowanttorepresent

    4,000,000at25metresifyouhavespace.Call

    everyonebackintheroomandengageindiscussion.DidtheythinkincomesinIrelandwerethisunequal?

    Isthislevelofinequalityacceptable?Canitbe

    justied?Isthislevelofinequalitygoodorbad

    forsociety?

    Exercise 3

    Asktheparticipantswhatlevelofincomeitwould

    taketolivecomfortablyforafamilyoffourinIreland

    today.Youmayhavetospecifyaparticularplace,

    likeDublinorTullamore,dependingonwhereyour

    participantslive.Thiscouldbedoneopenlyand

    youcouldattempttoarriveatanagreedlevelofincome.Oryoucouldhaveparticipantswritedown

    alevelanonymouslyandyoucouldtakeanaverage.

    HoldapointerorstickatthislevelontheChartand

    examinehowmanyhouseholdsfallbelowthislevel.

    Asktheparticipantsiftheyweresurprisedbythe

    numberbelowthecomfortlevel.

    Theat-risk-of-povertylevelofincomeforafamily

    offourcorrespondsroughlyto28,000onourChart.

    TheVincentianPartnershipforjusticeundertook

    astudywhichcalculatedaMinimumEssential

    Budgetforafamilyoffourwhichstoodatjustunder34,000for2006onourChart.Showtheselevelson

    theChart.Discuss.

    Exercise 5

    Brainstormpolicieswhichcouldbeadoptedby

    governmentwhichwouldreduceinequality.

    Exercise 4

    Asktheparticipantstoindentifyotherdimensionsof

    inequalitybesidesincome.Examplesmightinclude

    placeofresidence,workingconditions,accessto

    education,settledvs.traveller,etc.Discusshow

    theseotherdimensionsofinequalitydoordonot

    relatetoincomeinequality.

    Exercise 2

    Haveeachparticipantaddupandwritedowntheir

    familyincome.(Thisworksbetterwithadultsor

    perhapsolderteenagers.)Thenhavethemidentifytheirhouseholdcomposition.Thentheyshould

    identifytheoccupationsoftheadultmembersof

    thehousehold.Answeranyquestionsaboutwhere

    anoccupationmighttinthecategoriesonthe

    poster.Thenallowthestudentstoexaminethe

    H.E.A.P.Chartclosely(perhapsinsmallgroups)

    toidentifyforthemselveswheretheirhousehold

    appearsontheChart.

    Asktheparticipantstovolunteeranysurprises

    theymayhavegot.Wasanyonesurprisedathow

    hightheirincomewasontheChartcomparedto

    thegeneralpopulation?Wasanyonesurprisedat

    howlowtheirhouseholdwas?Didanyoneturnup

    inthemiddlewhentheydidntexpectto?

    Collectthedescriptionsoftheparticipants

    households.Makesuretheyarenotidentied

    byname.Shufethedescriptions.Locatethe

    householdsonthechartandmarkthem(usesticky

    notestoavoidpermanentlymarkingtheposter).

    Discussthepositionoftheworkshopinrelationto

    therestofthepopulation.Didtheyformapattern

    orweretheybunchedupatacertainlevel.Asktheparticipantstoexplainwhythisisthecase.

    APPENDIx:SUggESTIONS FOR WORkSHOP USE

  • 8/3/2019 9644 Heap Booklet(1)

    28/28

    Therearemanypeoplewhohavebeenagreathelp

    inbringingthisprojecttofruition.

    StephenRose,theauthoroftheoriginalAmerican

    ProlePoster,wasnotonlyasourceofinspiration,

    buthasalsobeengenerouswithhishelpand

    encouragementalongtheway.

    PaulSweeneysinitialandcontinuingenthusiasmforthisprojecthasbeenessentialinpressingitforward.

    AtTASC,PaulaClancy,AlexKlemmandSinadPentony

    havebeencentraltogettingthisdone.

    SallyAnnKinahansactivesupportforthisprojectwithin

    ICTUhasbeencrucial,whileFionaDunnehadthetough

    jobofholdingthisprojecttogether.

    RiccaEdmondsonandOliverFeeneyattheSocial

    SciencesResearchCentreatNUIGalwayhavebeen

    unfailinglysupportive.Wealsoreceivedindispensible

    assistancefromCathalODonoghueintheSchoolof

    BusinessandEconomicsatNUIGalway.

    OneIrishhouseholdhasprovidedinvaluablesupportto

    TerryMcDonough.ItisbestknowninMoycullenand

    beyondasMarianBradyshouse.

    OurcolleaguesfromWhitenoiseStudiosinBelfast,AlixBritton

    andPaulAllen,havebeenenthusiasticfromthebeginningand

    deservespecialmentionfortheirgraphicinterpretationand

    presentationofthistopic.

    ACkNOWLEDgEMENTS


Recommended