+ All Categories
Home > Social Media > A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

Date post: 12-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: keita-bando
View: 1,102 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
52
A BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’ Photo by @IBMbigdata KEITA BANDO, THE 3RD SPARC JAPAN SEMINAR 2015, JANUARY 19 2016
Transcript
Page 1: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

A BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’

Photo by @IBMbigdata

KEITA BANDO, THE 3RD SPARC JAPAN SEMINAR 2015, JANUARY 19 2016

Page 2: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

OUTLINE

• Self-introduction

• Overview of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• Primary features of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• How librarians should engage with ‘Social Networks for Scientists’?

A BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’

Photo by @IBMbigdata

Page 3: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

KEITA BANDOCOORDINATOR FOR THE ONLINE PLATFORM FOR SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION

Page 4: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• MyOpenArchive (2007 - 2013)

• OpenAccessWeekJP (2009 - 2010)

• ScienceCommonsJP (2010 - 2011)

• Mendeley Advisor (2011 - Present)

• ORCID Ambassador (2013 - Present)

MY ACTIVITIESKEITABANDO.ORG/ACTIVITIES

Page 5: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• Altmetrics: alternative ways of measuring scholarly impact based on the social web, Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2012 DOI: 10.1241/johokanri.55.638

• ORCID Outreach Meeting and Codefest in Chicago, Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2014 DOI: 10.1241/johokanri.57.423

• ResearchGate: SNS specialized for researchers with Repository function, Current Awareness, 2015 DOI: 10.11501/9396323

MY PUBLICATIONSORCID.ORG/0000-0003-0485-8891

Page 6: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

OUTLINEA BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’

Photo by @IBMbigdata

• Self-introduction

• Overview of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• Primary features of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• How librarians should engage with ‘Social Networks for Scientists’?

Page 7: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

… 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 …

THE HISTORY OF SOCIAL NETWORKS

Page 8: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

COMPARISON

ResearchGate Mendeley Academia

Logo

Network size 8 million (Oct 2015)

4 million (Apr 2015)

30 million (Dec 2015)

What’s? Social Network Site

Reference Manager

Social Network Site

Page 9: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
Page 10: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
Page 11: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
Page 12: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

REMARKABLE REACHNATURE SURVEY DOI:10.1038/512126A (AUGUST 2014)

Page 13: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

REMARKABLE REACHNATURE SURVEY DOI:10.1038/512126A (AUGUST 2014)

Page 14: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

IDLE, BROWSE OR CHAT?NATURE SURVEY DOI:10.1038/512126A (AUGUST 2014)

Page 15: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

101 INNOVATIONS IN SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONHTTPS://101INNOVATIONS.WORDPRESS.COM

Page 16: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

WHAT TOOLS/SITES DO YOU USE TO ARCHIVE/SHARE PUBLICATIONS?SURVEY DOI:10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1286826 (JUNE 2015)

Page 17: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

WHAT RESEARCHER PROFILES DO YOU USE?SURVEY DOI:10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1286826 (JUNE 2015)

Page 18: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

WHAT DISCIPLINE(S) ARE YOU WORKING IN?SURVEY DOI:10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1286826 (JUNE 2015)

Page 19: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

OUTLINEA BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’

Photo by @IBMbigdata

• Self-introduction

• Overview of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• Primary features of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• How librarians should engage with ‘Social Networks for Scientists’?

Page 20: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• Repository • Collaborate • Metrics • Institution

OUTLINEPRIMARY FEATURES OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’

Photo by @IBMbigdata

Page 21: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
Page 22: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
Page 23: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
Page 24: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

CHOOSE WHETHER YOU’D LIKE TO ENTER AN EXISTING DOI OR GENERATE A NEW DOI.

VIA CELEBRATING FIVE MILLION MEMBERS WITH FREE DOIS - RESEARCHGATE (AUGUST 2014)

Page 25: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

THE PLATFORM .. GIVE IT A UNIQUE IDENTIFIER (A VERSIONED DOI)VIA PUT YOUR RESEARCH DATA ONLINE, WITH MENDELEY DATA! (NOVEMBER 2015)

Page 26: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
Page 27: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

AUTHORS ARE DEPOSITING THEIR PAPERS IN THESE WEBSITES INSTEAD OF THEIR OWN IR.

VIA NEW EDITION WITH UPDATED INFO (JANUARY 2015)

Page 28: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’
Page 29: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

A SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE IS NOT AN OPEN ACCESS REPOSITORY

CC BY: THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION (DECEMBER 2015)

Page 30: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• Repository • Collaborate

• Metrics • Institution

OUTLINEPRIMARY FEATURES OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’

Photo by @IBMbigdata

Page 31: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

RG FORMATVIA INTRODUCING THE RG FORMAT (FEBRUARY 2015)

Page 32: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

COLLABORATE WITH YOUR RESEARCH TEAMEACH GROUP MEMBER IS ASSIGNED A DIFFERENT COLOR FOR HIGHLIGHTING

VIA INTRO TO MENDELEY (OFFICIAL EXTENDED) EDITED FOR UMICH

Page 33: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

ANNOTATING THE SCHOLARLY WEBSCIENTISTS COULD SCRIBBLE COMMENTS ON RESEARCH PAPERS AND SHARE THEM PUBLICLY ..

NATURE 528, 153–154 (03 DECEMBER 2015) DOI:10.1038/528153A

Page 34: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

ANNOTATING ALL KNOWLEDGENEW SCHOLARLY COALITION EMBRACES W3C WEB ANNOTATIONS (DECEMBER 2015)

Page 35: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• Repository • Collaborate • Metrics

• Institution

OUTLINEPRIMARY FEATURES OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’

Photo by @IBMbigdata

Page 36: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

RG SCORETHE RG SCORE IS A METRIC THAT MEASURES SCIENTIFIC REPUTATION BASED

ON HOW ALL OF YOUR RESEARCH IS RECEIVED BY YOUR PEERS.

Page 37: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

INSTITUTIONS ON RESEARCHGATETHIS LIST SHOWS INSTITUTIONS BY THE SUM OF THE RG SCORES OF THEIR

INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS USING RESEARCHGATE.

Page 38: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

THE RG SCORE INCORPORATES THE JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR TO EVALUATE INDIVIDUAL RESEARCHERS.

VIA THE RESEARCHGATE SCORE: A GOOD EXAMPLE OF A BAD METRIC (DECEMBER 2015)

Page 39: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

MENDELEY STATSMENDELEY STATS WILL ALLOW YOU TO SEE A NUMBER OF METRICS THAT WILL

GIVE YOU A UNIQUE, ..

Page 40: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

ALTMETRICS - MORE & DIFFERENT DATA PLEASEVIA TRIP REPORT: 5 YEARS OF ALTMETRICS #2AMCONF #ALTMETRICS15 (OCTOBER 2015)

Photo by @digicmb

Page 41: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• Repository • Collaborate • Metrics • Institution

OUTLINEPRIMARY FEATURES OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’

Photo by @IBMbigdata

Page 42: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

THE UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO ON RESEARCHGATEHTTPS://WWW.RESEARCHGATE.NET/INSTITUTION/THE_UNIVERSITY_OF_TOKYO

Page 43: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

THE UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO | MENDELEY GROUPHTTPS://WWW.MENDELEY.COM/GROUPS/7440181/THE-UNIVERSITY-OF -TOKYO/

Page 44: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

THE UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO - ACADEMIA.EDUHTTPS://U-TOKYO.ACADEMIA.EDU

Page 45: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

OUTLINEA BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’

Photo by @IBMbigdata

• Self-introduction

• Overview of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• Primary features of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• How librarians should engage with ‘Social Networks for Scientists’?

Page 46: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

RESEARCHMAPHTTP://RESEARCHMAP.JP

Page 47: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

ORCIDHTTP://ORCID.ORG

Page 48: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

GOOGLE SCHOLAR CITATIONSHTTPS://SCHOLAR.GOOGLE.COM

Page 49: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

SCIENTISTS WANT TO COLLABORATE ONLINE

Photo by @IBMbigdata

Page 50: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• Institutional Repository

• Current Research Information System

• Institutional Level Metrics

• Research support

• Anything else?

HOW LIBRARIANS SHOULD ENGAGE WITH ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’?

Page 51: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

OUTLINEA BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’

Photo by @IBMbigdata

• Self-introduction

• Overview of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• Primary features of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

• How librarians should engage with ‘Social Networks for Scientists’?

Page 52: A Brief Review of ‘Social Networks for Scientists’

A BRIEF REVIEW OF ‘SOCIAL NETWORKS FOR SCIENTISTS’

KEITA BANDO, THE 3RD SPARC JAPAN SEMINAR 2015, JANUARY 19 2016

Photo by @IBMbigdata


Recommended