A Cross-Layer Optimization Mechanism for Multimedia Traffic over IEEE 802.16 Networks. 指導老師:童曉儒 教授 報告學生:許益晨. Outline. Introduction Architectural Framework Information Flow The Proposed Mechanism Simulation Model And Results Conclusion. Introduction. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
25
LOGO A Cross-Layer Optimization Mechanism for Multimedia Traffic over IEEE 802.16 Networks 指指指指 指指指 指指 : 指指指指 指指指 :
Transcript
A Cross-Layer Optimization Mechanism for Multimedia Traffic over
IEEE 802.16 Networks A Cross-Layer Optimization Mechanism for
Multimedia Traffic over IEEE 802.16 Networks
A cross-layer optimization mechanism for IEEE 802.16 metropolitan
area networks.
Modern communication systems is the parameterized operation at
different layers of the protocol stack.
A cross-layer optimization mechanism that interacts with the
Physical (PHY), Medium Access Control (MAC), and Application
layers.
IEEE 802.16
*
LOGO
QoSQuality of Service
*
Architectural Framework
The cross-layer optimization which consists of N layers and a
cross-layer optimizer .
The optimization process is performed in three steps:
Layer abstraction
Architectural Framework
In general, the different parameters can be divided in four main
types:
Directly Tunable (DT)
Indirectly Tunable (IT)
SS /
*
Information Flow
Channel Measurements
The BS needs information regarding the quality of the signal
received by the SSs.
by each SS on the uplink.
Channel Quality Information Channel (CQICH)
*
B. Traffic Rate Adjustments
*
The Proposed Mechanism
In case most of the losses are due to poor channel conditions
(packet errors)
the BS part instructs the MAC layer for a degradation of the
modulation, in order to achieve higher channel error resilience and
increase robustness against interference.
In case most of the losses are the result of packet timeouts
(unacceptable delays)
a. If the loss rate is caused almost exclusively by packet
timeouts
b. In different case, when a significant percentage of packet
losses are caused by errors due to the poor channel
conditions
1 2 3 3 4 CINRIEEE 802.16PHY [ 8 ] MACSSUL - MAPMAC
*
The Proposed Mechanism
If the mean delay is relatively low compared to the delay
bound
If the mean delay is close to the delay bound
SS
2
SS/MAC 3 3 4 4 SS 4 3 5 4 SS 5 3 6 4
AMR [ 9 ] [ 10 ] 7 4 [ 11 ] piggybacked
CINR[ 8 ]
ModelerSS
Simulation Model And Results
*
LOGO
Conclusion
LOGO
Conclusion
With the aid of a detailed simulation model, we showed that the use
of the proposed optimization mechanism leads to an efficient
exploitation of the adaptation capabilities, resulting in
considerably reduced packet loss rates and improved system’s
capacity, especially under heavy traffic conditions.
IEEE 802.16PHYMAC