+ All Categories
Home > Documents > A further study on the interaction between one of organic active fractions of the MHA binder and...

A further study on the interaction between one of organic active fractions of the MHA binder and...

Date post: 10-Sep-2016
Category:
Upload: tao-jiang
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
7
A further study on the interaction between one of organic active fractions of the MHA binder and iron ore surface Tao Jiang, Guihong Han , Yuanbo Zhang, Guanghui Li, Yanfang Huang School of Minerals Processing & Bioengineering, Central South University, 410083, Changsha, P.R. China abstract article info Article history: Received 3 April 2011 Received in revised form 7 July 2011 Accepted 10 July 2011 Available online 20 July 2011 Keywords: Organic binder Fulvic acid Agglomeration Chemical adsorption Binder is essential in the iron ore agglomeration. Fulvic acid (FA) is one of organic active fractions of the MHA binder. A further study of the interaction between FA and iron ore surface was conducted via elemental analysis, chemical group analysis, batch adsorption experiments, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) investigation, zeta potential measurements and scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging. It is found that the adsorption amount of FA onto iron ore surface obviously increases with increasing the solution pH. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis indicates that ligand exchange (coordination) as a special chemical adsorption occurs at the interface of iron ore and FA. Zeta potential results display that the adsorption of FA onto iron ore surface can be characterized by specic ligand exchange and electrostatic forces. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging shows that occulation sedimentation is observed during the adsorption process. Ball-shaped FAmineral colloidal complex with a diameter of 20100 μm is presented in the SEM micrograph of FA-coated mineral granules. Ligand exchange, hydrophobic interactions and electrostatic force are contributive to the adsorption, with ligand exchange and hydrophobic interactions predominant. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Binder is essential in the iron ore agglomeration for the improve- ment of green pellet strength (Allen, 1989; Jiang et al., 2001). These binders mainly comprise inorganics or organics, or a combination of these fractions. For example, bentonite as a representative inorganics has been the iron ore industry's binder standard. Peridur (tradename), a famous organic binder, has been accepted practice in America, Japan and Brazil for many years (Murr and Englund, 1989). The practice shows that organic binder has the ability to replace inorganic bentonite to ensure good strength of green pellet in the agglomeration process. Furthermore, the organic binder is easily burned out during induration and does not contaminate the product. The effects of bentonite and Peridur binders on the chemical composition had been best expounded in former literatures (Dennis and David, 1989; Haas et al., 1989). However, Peridur has not been successfully applied in the production of iron ore pellets due to its high cost, complexity of iron ore properties, as well as special production process of pellet (grate- kiln process) in China (Jiang et al., 2007; Han et al., 2010). The obvious strengths promote the development of domestic organic or organic-based binders with the rapid development of iron and steel industry in China. One promising type of modied humic substance based binder, namely MHA binder, has been patented and proven by laboratory studies to be suitable for iron ore agglomeration. Humic substances (HS) are the major functional fraction of the MHA binder (Han et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2011). The studies showed HS performed a chemical function as well as a physical on the iron ore surface (Han et al., 2010). Nevertheless, there still exists a general lack of understanding of the interaction between HS and iron ore surface. Humic substances in the MHA binder can be further separated into two fractions, according to their solubility, such as fulvic acid (FA) and humic acid (HA). FA is the fraction of humic substances that is soluble under all pH conditions and is referred to as moderate molecular weight substances ranging from several hundreds to several thousands (Thurman and Malcolm, 1981). HA is dened as the fraction of humic substances that is not soluble in water under acid conditions (below pH 2), but becomes soluble at greater pH. HA is often referred to as being the high molecular weight fraction, with being estimated above ten thousand (Thurman and Malcolm, 1981). FA, compared with HA, has more active groups, such as carbonyl, carboxyl and alcohol hydroxyl. The former studies had shown that the adsorption of FA on the surface of magnetite was stronger than that of HA. It can be concluded that the adsorption of FA onto iron ore surface plays a dominant role in the iron ore agglomeration (Han et al., 2010). It is therefore needed for a full understanding of adsorption of FA on the iron ore surface. In general, three mechanisms are reported in the adsorption of HS onto minerals, including (i) specic adsorption with ligand exchange (coordination) (Murphy et al., 1990; Yang et al., 2009), (ii) entropy- driven hydrophobic humichumic interactions (Meier et al., 1999) and International Journal of Mineral Processing 100 (2011) 172178 Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (G. Han). 0301-7516/$ see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.minpro.2011.07.002 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Mineral Processing journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijminpro
Transcript
Page 1: A further study on the interaction between one of organic active fractions of the MHA binder and iron ore surface

International Journal of Mineral Processing 100 (2011) 172–178

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

International Journal of Mineral Processing

j ourna l homepage: www.e lsev ie r.com/ locate / i jm inpro

A further study on the interaction between one of organic active fractions of the MHAbinder and iron ore surface

Tao Jiang, Guihong Han ⁎, Yuanbo Zhang, Guanghui Li, Yanfang HuangSchool of Minerals Processing & Bioengineering, Central South University, 410083, Changsha, P.R. China

⁎ Corresponding author.E-mail address: [email protected] (G. Han)

0301-7516/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. Adoi:10.1016/j.minpro.2011.07.002

a b s t r a c t

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Received 3 April 2011Received in revised form 7 July 2011Accepted 10 July 2011Available online 20 July 2011

Keywords:Organic binderFulvic acidAgglomerationChemical adsorption

Binder is essential in the iron ore agglomeration. Fulvic acid (FA) is one of organic active fractions of the MHAbinder. A further study of the interaction between FA and iron ore surface was conducted via elementalanalysis, chemical group analysis, batch adsorption experiments, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)investigation, zeta potential measurements and scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging. It is found thatthe adsorption amount of FA onto iron ore surface obviously increases with increasing the solution pH. X-rayphotoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis indicates that ligand exchange (coordination) as a specialchemical adsorption occurs at the interface of iron ore and FA. Zeta potential results display that theadsorption of FA onto iron ore surface can be characterized by specific ligand exchange and electrostaticforces. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging shows that flocculation sedimentation is observedduring the adsorption process. Ball-shaped FA–mineral colloidal complex with a diameter of 20–100 μm ispresented in the SEM micrograph of FA-coated mineral granules. Ligand exchange, hydrophobic interactionsand electrostatic force are contributive to the adsorption, with ligand exchange and hydrophobic interactionspredominant.

.

ll rights reserved.

© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Binder is essential in the iron ore agglomeration for the improve-ment of green pellet strength (Allen, 1989; Jiang et al., 2001). Thesebinders mainly comprise inorganics or organics, or a combination ofthese fractions. For example, bentonite as a representative inorganicshas been the iron ore industry's binder standard. Peridur (tradename),a famous organic binder, has been accepted practice in America, Japanand Brazil for many years (Murr and Englund, 1989). The practiceshows that organic binder has the ability to replace inorganicbentonite to ensure good strength of green pellet in the agglomerationprocess. Furthermore, the organic binder is easily burned out duringinduration and does not contaminate the product. The effects ofbentonite and Peridur binders on the chemical composition had beenbest expounded in former literatures (Dennis and David, 1989; Haaset al., 1989). However, Peridur has not been successfully applied in theproduction of iron ore pellets due to its high cost, complexity of ironore properties, as well as special production process of pellet (grate-kiln process) in China (Jiang et al., 2007; Han et al., 2010).

The obvious strengths promote the development of domesticorganic or organic-based binders with the rapid development of ironand steel industry in China. One promising type of modified humicsubstance based binder, namely MHA binder, has been patented and

proven by laboratory studies to be suitable for iron ore agglomeration.Humic substances (HS) are the major functional fraction of the MHAbinder (Han et al., 2010; Jiang et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2011). Thestudies showedHS performed a chemical function aswell as a physicalon the iron ore surface (Han et al., 2010). Nevertheless, there still existsa general lack of understanding of the interaction betweenHS and ironore surface.

Humic substances in the MHA binder can be further separated intotwo fractions, according to their solubility, such as fulvic acid (FA) andhumic acid (HA). FA is the fraction of humic substances that is solubleunder all pH conditions and is referred to as moderate molecularweight substances ranging from several hundreds to several thousands(Thurman and Malcolm, 1981). HA is defined as the fraction of humicsubstances that is not soluble in water under acid conditions (below pH2), but becomes soluble at greaterpH.HA is often referred toasbeing thehigh molecular weight fraction, with being estimated above tenthousand (Thurman and Malcolm, 1981). FA, compared with HA, hasmore active groups, such as carbonyl, carboxyl and alcohol hydroxyl.The former studieshad shown that the adsorptionof FAon the surfaceofmagnetite was stronger than that of HA. It can be concluded that theadsorption of FA onto iron ore surface plays a dominant role in the ironore agglomeration (Han et al., 2010). It is therefore needed for a fullunderstanding of adsorption of FA on the iron ore surface.

In general, three mechanisms are reported in the adsorption of HSonto minerals, including (i) specific adsorption with ligand exchange(coordination) (Murphy et al., 1990; Yang et al., 2009), (ii) entropy-drivenhydrophobic humic–humic interactions (Meier et al., 1999) and

Page 2: A further study on the interaction between one of organic active fractions of the MHA binder and iron ore surface

Table 1Main characteristics of FA sample.

(Wt. %) (mmol/g) E4/E6(pH 7)

C O H N Total acidicgroup

Carboxylgroup

Phenolic hydroxylgroup

51.75 38.42 6.49 3.36 10.08 3.692 6.388 6.73

Note: corrected by ash content.

173T. Jiang et al. / International Journal of Mineral Processing 100 (2011) 172–178

(iii) electrostatic force caused by attraction between the negatively(positively) charged mineral surface and positively (negatively)charged HS fractions (Thurman and Malcolm, 1981). For instance,coordinative and hydrophobic interactions occur between FA andsynthetic goethite (Ochs et al., 1994; Fu and Xie, 2006). Hydrophobicinteraction is one of the leading adsorption mechanisms of FA ontokaolinite (Li et al., 2008). HA adsorption by nano-oxides is mainly dueto electrostatic attraction and ligand exchange (Yang et al., 2009).

In this investigation, elemental analysis, chemical group analysis,batch adsorption experiments, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)investigation, zeta potential measurements and scanning electronmicroscope (SEM) imaging were used to analyze the FA sample, theadsorption of FA onto iron ore and the surface properties of FA–mineralcolloidal complex.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

The FA sample was isolated from a typical kind of brown coal inHunan province of China. The experimental procedures for separationof FA from the brown coal were shown in Fig. 1. The supernatant waspurified with a strongly acidic styrene type cation exchange resin toremove bivalent and trivalent cations, and subsequently freeze-dried.

The FA sample was characterized by elemental analysis, chemicalgroup analysis, and visible spectrum (E4/E6) as described elsewhere(Han et al., 2010). Themain characteristic of FAwas listed in Table 1. Asshown in Table 1, O/H and H/C weight ratio was respectively 0.74 and0.12, indicating that FA was polar substance (Namjesnik et al., 2000).

The natural iron ore (magnetite)was obtained from Shanxi Provinceof China. Firstly, the magnetite samples were ground and passedthrough a 10 μm vibration sieve. Then undersize magnetite granuleswere used for test. Specific surface area of undersized granules was3575 cm2/g,whichwasmeasured bya cementblaine tester. The particlesize distribution ofmagnetite granuleswas determined by laser particlesize analyzer (CILAS 1064) and the results were given in Table 2.

Main chemical compositions of magnetite granules were testedand presented in Table 3. It can be seen from Table 3 that themagnetite samples were composed of about 94% of ferroferric oxide,and the main gangue mineral is quartz.

2.2. Batch adsorption experiments

The magnetite granule suspension was first prepared by puttingsomemagnetite into a known volume of distilled water. Test solutions

Fig. 1. Flowchart outlining procedures for separation of FA from brown coal.

at the dry mass ratio of FA to magnetite were gotten by diluting someFA powders in a proper amount of magnetite granules suspension. Thesolutionswere quickly adjusted to needed pH (that is, within±0.1 pHunits) by small additions of 0.1 MNaOH buffer andwere stirredwith amagnetic stirrer at 25 °C. When it came to the fixed adsorption time,the suspensions were filtered. The filtered supernatants were dilutedwith the 0.1 MNaOHbuffer, and then the remaining FA concentrationswere measured at wavelength 465 nm with a model 722N visiblespectrophotometer immediately as well as 0.1 M NaOH buffer asreference solution. All batch adsorption experiments were conductedtwice.

The adsorbed amount (Qm) of FA onto mineral was estimated asthe difference in FA before and after adsorption according to Eq. (1)(Zhou et al., 2001):

Qm =C0−Ctð ÞMmag•V

ð1Þ

where, Qm (mg g−1) is the amount of FA adsorbed by unit weight ofmineral at different adsorption time; C0 (mg/L) and Ct (mg/L) are thefirst and final concentrations of FA in the solution, V (ml) andMmag (g)represent the volume of the liquid phase and the mass of magnetiteadded into liquid phase, respectively.

2.3. Zeta potential measurements

Zeta potentials of samples were measured with a Coulter Delsamodel 440sx by taking the average of four measurements. Magnetitegranule suspension of 10 g/L was prepared by putting 10 g magnetiteinto 1 L distill water. Test solutions at a wished FA to mineralconcentration were gotten by diluting some FA powders with a fittingamount of magnetite granule suspension. Mineral solutions with andwithout the presence of FA were checked by an acidometer PHSJ-4A.Small amounts of 0.1 MHCl or NaOHwere added to achieve pH valuesbetween 2 and 12. Ionic strength of solutions was set equally at thesame time. The temperature of the tested solution was controlled at25 °C. Each measurement was repeated four times and an averagevalue was calculated.

2.4. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis

Samples were from the flocculation sedimentation of batchadsorption experiments. X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (XPS)Model PHI-5400 (America PE Corporation) was used to test thesurface composition of magnetite granules coated with FA fractions.The XPS measurements were made on a VG ESCALAB MkII spectrom-eter with an AlKα X-ray source (1486 eV photons). The X-ray source

Table 2Particle size distribution of magnetite granules.

(Wt. %) (μm)

−2 μm −4 μm −6 μm −8 μm −10 μm Averageparticle size

Maximumparticle size

35.11 59.29 73.28 87.07 100 3.64 9.75

Page 3: A further study on the interaction between one of organic active fractions of the MHA binder and iron ore surface

Table 3Main chemical compositions of magnetite granules (Wt. %).

TFe FeO SiO2 Al2O3 CaO MgO P S

67.12 27.42 4.04 0.52 0.60 0.36 0.023 0.021

Table 4Fitting parameters for adsorption speed of FA onto magnetite granules.

pH Equilibriumtime (min)

Maximum adsorptionamount (mg g−1)

Fitting equation ofadsorption speed

R2

4 110 8.5 Qm=2.11·t0.29692 0.91277 120 10.1 Qm=2.66·t0.28397 0.971310 120 11.0 Qm=3.58 t0.23731 0.9370

Note: R2 is the coefficient of determination, used in curve fitting to show the goodness-of-fit.

174 T. Jiang et al. / International Journal of Mineral Processing 100 (2011) 172–178

was produced by a reduced power of 150 W (15 kV and 10 mA). Thepressure in the analysis chamber was kept at 7.5×10−9 Torr or lowerduring the measurement. In peak syntheses, the linewidth (full widthat half maximum or FWHM) of the gaussian peaks was upheldconstant for all parts in a particular spectrum. Surface elementalstoichiometries were measured from peak–area ratios, after correctedwith the experimentally determined sensitivity index, and werereliable to ±5%.

2.5. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging

First, samples from the flocculation sedimentation of batchadsorption experiments were pipetted onto a glass slide surface andplaced into a desiccator, where samples are dried at room temper-ature. The testing samples were sprayed with gold powder and pasteda conducting resin to improve the conductivity. Finally, the sampleswere analyzed by a SEM, Model Quanta 200 (FEI Corporation, Holand;EDAX, US).

3. Results and discussions

3.1. Adsorption kinetics and effects of the solution pH

Short-term batch experiments on the adsorption kinetics of FAonto magnetite granule surfaces at different solution pH values werefirstly studied. The adsorption amount and the fitting parameters foradsorption speed of FA ontomagnetite against the adsorption time areplotted in Fig. 2 and listed in Table 4, respectively.

The results in Fig. 2 and Table 4 indicate that adsorption amount ofFA ontomagnetite increases with prolonging the adsorption time. Thefitting equations of adsorption speed show good fits to the practicaladsorption. As adsorption time is increased to 110–120 min, theadsorption amounts at acid and basic pH conditions almost keepunchanged, which shows adsorption of FA onto magnetite quicklyreaches the equilibrium.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1400

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Ads

orpt

ion

amou

nt (

mg.

g-1)

Adsorption time (min)

pH 4

pH 7

pH 10

Fitting curves

Fig. 2. Adsorption amount curves of FA adsorbed onto magnetite at a given solutionchemistry (FA solution concentration of 500 mg/L, and FA to mineral weight ratio of1.0%).

Under conditions of the same adsorption time, adsorption amountincreases obviously with increasing the solution pH value. In the viewof amuch faster adsorption equilibriumandhigher adsorption amountat higher pH value in this study, the interactions of FA fractions withmagnetite must be stronger than electrostatic repulsion. It can beconcluded that electrostatic interaction is not a chief interactionbetween the magnetite and FA.

At different FA solution concentrations, results show no greatdifferences with the results presented in Fig. 2 and are therefore notshown. However, effects of the solution pH on the interaction betweenFA and magnetite granules in a higher FA solution concentration areremarked during the experiments (Fig. 3). Fig. 3 displays that,flocculation sedimentation of magnetite granules in suspensionsolution occurs both at acid and basic pH conditions. In previousstudy of adsorption, flocculation has also been viewed. The paperreiterated adsorption and flocculation must occur simultaneously towork and should not be thought of as separate mechanisms (Hogg,2000). With prolonging the adsorption time, interestingly, thesedimentation degree increases noticeably at pH 10. It is revealedthat effects of the solution pH on the adsorption between FA andmagnetite granules are intense, which are also reflected in theadsorption kinetics. Themost likely explanation for the pH-dependentadsorptionof FA ontomagnetite is the high ability ofmagnetite to formstrong complexeswith FA. Since complex formation of magnetite withFA involves a ligand exchange with protons, complex formationincreases with increasing of pH; that is, the higher the pH, the morecomplex is formed.

3.2. XPS investigation

TheXPS spectrumprovides information on the chemical changes ofa given atom or ionic forms in themineral (Wagner and Ringgs, 1979).XPS, therefore, was used to find out whether chemical adsorption orreaction occurs on magnetite surfaces in the presence of FA. The XPSspectrums of magnetite granules and magnetite granules adsorbedwith FA is plotted in Fig. 4. Meanwhile, carbon-containing chemicalgroups of FA fractions adsorbed onmagnetite are calculated as listed inTable 5.

As seen from Fig. 4(A) and (B), the binding energy of Fe2p3/2 in themagnetite granules coatedwith FA is 712.33 eV, lower than that in themagnetite granules alone (713.45 eV). Besides, the distance betweenFe2p1/2 and Fe2p3/2 in magnetite granules coatedwith FA is also lowerthan that in the magnetite granules. Those results suggest there isspecial chemical reaction on the magnetite surface in the presence ofFA fractions (Wagner and Ringgs, 1979; Teermann and Jekel, 1999).Among the interactions between HS and minerals, ligand exchange isconsidered to be the most important and strongest interaction whichis able to cause chemical reaction on the minerals surface (Greenland,1971). Ligand exchanges as special chemical adsorption, therefore, arebelieved to occur at the link ofmagnetite and FA. Just because of strongligand exchange, FA fractions adsorb onto the magnetite quickly evenunder the condition of some electrostatic repulsion existing.

Fig. 4(C) and Table 5 show that the content of functional groups ofFA is increased on the surface of magnetite. According to the calcu-lation, content of polar groups containing carbon of FA is about

Page 4: A further study on the interaction between one of organic active fractions of the MHA binder and iron ore surface

Fig. 3. Photograph of effects of the solution pH on the interactions between FA and magnetite granules in suspension (FA solution concentration of 1000 mg/L, and FA to mineralweight ratio of 2.0%) (A) at pH 4; (B) at pH 10.

175T. Jiang et al. / International Journal of Mineral Processing 100 (2011) 172–178

42.84%, with nonpolar groups of 57.16%. It shows that FA fractionshave been adsorbed onto magnetite surfaces. The result is in agree-ment with the existing works which show that adsorption of naturalorganic matter (NOM) onto mineral surfaces is assigned to their polarcarboxylic and phenolic groups (Mcknight et al., 1992).

3.3. Zeta potential study

Although XPS provides qualitative analysis, it cannot explainclearly adsorption of FA onto mineral surface. To complement XPS,zeta potentialmeasuringwas used to analyze the interactions betweenFA and magnetite at acid and basic pH conditions.

Zeta potential, often, can be used to estimate the likely effect ofvarious adsorbate on the properties of minerals (Hunter, 1981). The

Fig. 4. XPS spectrums of magnetite granules and magnetite granules coated with FA. (A) Bingranules coated with FA at pH 10, FA solution concentration of 1000 mg/L, and FA to miner

zeta potentials versus pH curvesmatching to the suspendedmagnetitegranules in the absence and presence of FA are shown in Fig. 5.

From Fig. 5, it can be seen that the zeta potential of magnetiteparticles with and without FA is affected with the changing of thesolution pH. The pH value where the zeta potential changes sign orisoelectric point (IEP) characterizes the electrical properties of amineral (Hunter, 1981). The IEP of the magnetite is at pH 6.1 in purewater solution, which is close to the reported IEP of iron oxides at pH6.5 (Wang, 1994). As seen from Fig. 5, FA adsorption is observed largerthan the magnetite IEP value, indicating that electrostatic effects arelikely not the main controls on adsorption (Mahir et al., 2005). Thisconclusion is in line with the results of adsorption kinetics of FA ontomagnetite and XPS results.

Meantime, it is shown in Fig. 5 that the zeta potentials ofmagnetiteadsorbed with FA are further increased and become positive at either

ding energy of Fe in magnetite granules at pH 10; (B) binding energy of Fe in magnetiteal weight ratio of 1.0%; (C) XPS C1s spectrum of sample (B).

Page 5: A further study on the interaction between one of organic active fractions of the MHA binder and iron ore surface

Table 5Carbon-containing chemical groups of FA frinteractions on magnetite surface (wt. %).

Polar groups Nonpolar groups

COO C_O C\O C\H C_C

8.38 8.96 25.98 43.33 13.73

176 T. Jiang et al. / International Journal of Mineral Processing 100 (2011) 172–178

acidic or alkaline pH values. As the pH is increased, the zeta potentialvalue grows to reach maximum value around the IEP. While pH isincreased from the IEP to pH 12, the magnitude of the zeta potentialdecreases slightly. The trends are in good agreement with the findingsof other researchers (Wang, 1994). It has been recognized thatadsorption of FA onto magnetite particles can be characterized byspecific chemical reaction (ligand exchange) from the results of XPSstudy. Literatures show that an acidic organic ligand which iscoordinated to the metal ion on the surface of the oxide, replaces ahydroxyl group, to increase the density of acidic protonation (Tipping,1981). FA fractions are concentrated on mineral surfaces, leading tolocally increased charge densities. This would result in an accumu-lation of acidic protonation on the surface of mineral. When density ofacidic protonation comes to certain extent, it can make the charge ofmineral surface reverse even though the absorbed FA fractions carrynegative charges. Positive zeta potentials of magnetite at acidic andalkaline pH values suggest that specific adsorption (ligand exchange)of FA is so strong that electrostatic force does not have enough powerto overcome it.

The increase in zeta potential below the IEP and the decrease inzeta potential above the IEP with the pH value increasing can beexplained by considering the ligand exchange and electrostaticinteractions between the acidic moieties of FA and the magnetitesurface. Under the condition of pH values smaller than the IEP ofmagnetite, magnetite is positive. With increasing of solution pH andionization, fulvic acid carries more and more negative charges. Theincrease of zeta potential due to that ligand exchange is strengthenedby electrostatic attraction occurring at the boundary of magnetite andFA. Under the condition of pH values larger than the IEP, magnetite isnegative. The decrease of zeta potential lie in that ligand exchange isweakened by electrostatic repulsion occurring at the boundary.

From the results mentioned above, it can be concluded thatadsorption of FA onto magnetite particles can be characterized byspecific ligand exchange and electrostatic interactions.

2 4 6 8 10 12-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10 Magnetite Magnetite coated with FA

Zet

a po

tent

ial (

mV

)

pH

IEP=6.1

Potentials increase

Fig. 5. Zeta potentials versus pH curves matching to the suspended magnetite granulesin the absence and presence of FA.

3.4. SEM imaging

Flocculation has been observed in the adsorption. SEM imaging,therefore, was conducted to provide insights into the nature ofinteractions between FA and magnetite granules and a true picture ofmagnetite–FA colloidal complex. The surface topographies of themagnetite before and after FA adsorption are shown in Fig. 6.

As shown in Fig. 6(B), compared with magnetite without FAfractions in Fig. 6(A), flocculation indicates that adsorption of FA ontomagnetite granules takes place. Magnetite particles are linkedwith FAmolecule. And FAmolecule presents on the surface of magnetite in theshape of an araneose histioid network. Adsorption of FA fractions ontomagnetite is mainly related to both their carboxyl groups and theirmolecular weight (Gu et al., 1995; Chi and Amy, 2004).

As listed in Table 2, the size of magnetite particles is smaller than10 μm, with an average particle size of 3.64 μm. However, markeddifferences are found to exist in the shape and size of particles. Ballshaped magnetite–FA colloidal complex with a diameter of 20–100 μmpresents in the SEM images of FA-coatedmagnetite samples in Fig. 6(C)and (D), while no “ball” aggregates can be seen from the blank samplesin Fig. 6(A). Appearance of large ball-shaped substance indicatescompressed conformation in the magnetite–FA colloidal complex.However, it is clear that these images cannot be directly used to inferthe inner structure of the magnetite–FA colloidal complex.

Formation of magnetite–FA colloidal complex can be mainlyexplained as two reasons. One is that ligand exchange takes place inthe link of FA andmagnetite particles. Ligand exchange increases withincreasing of pH value, which makes the adsorption amount increaseas pH increases, and flocculation are obvious at higher pH values. Also,the adsorbed FA can have influences on the chemical properties of theunderlying mineral (for example, electrical property or chargedensity), which plays an important role in changing the interfacialbehavior (Davis, 1982). Just as described in Fig. 5, zeta potentials ofthe magnetite coated with FA are changed by ligand exchange, beingpositive at a wide range of pH values. Adsorption of the polar moietiesof FA and the magnetite onto the FA-coated magnetite are improvedby electrostatic attractions. Therefore, FA fractions, fine magnetiteparticles, and the FA-coatedmagnetite are aggregatedmore obviouslyat higher pH values.

The other reason is that organic macromolecules formed byhydrophobic FA–FA interactionsmightpromote smallmagnetite particlesor small magnetite–FA colloidal complex to form larger magnetite–FAcolloidal complex (Fig. 6(C) and (D)). A highermagnification image of thecomplex surface is shown in Fig. 6(E) and (F), which show that FAaggregates are observable on the surface of magnetite–FA colloidalcomplex. FA aggregates arebelieved togrowbecauseof polymer chains toadhere to one another on contact (Hogg, 2000). As well as the size of theaggregates, clearly, the multilayer aggregates noted in Fig. 6(F) arecomposed of manymuch smaller macromolecules as viewed in Fig. 6(E).It shows that the hydrophobic FA–FA interactions lead to multiplemolecule adsorption of FA to complex. Meanwhile, hydrophobic in-teractions on the magnetite–FA complex may provide new hydrophobicadsorption sites condensed aromatic or long chain aliphatic moieties(Brunauer et al., 1938; Murphy et al., 1990).

In brief, flocculation sedimentation is accompanied with the FAadsorption ontomagnetite. Finemagnetite particles are aggregated bythe adsorbed FA. When magnetite–FA colloidal complex grows to thesuitable size, sedimentation forms as presented in Fig. 3. Ligandexchange, hydrophobic interactions and electrostatic attractioncontribute to the adsorption, but ligand exchange and hydrophobicinteractions dominate the adsorption mechanisms.

4. Conclusions

This investigation is carried out to understand the interactionbetween FA and iron ore surface. Adsorption of FA onto magnetite

Page 6: A further study on the interaction between one of organic active fractions of the MHA binder and iron ore surface

Fig. 6. SEM images of (A) magnetite granules; (B) magnetite granules coated with FA network; (C) small magnetite–FA colloidal complex; (D) hugemagnetite–FA colloidal complex;(E) small FA fraction aggregates on the magnetite–FA colloidal complex surface; and (F) huge FA fraction aggregates on the magnetite–FA colloidal complex surface.

177T. Jiang et al. / International Journal of Mineral Processing 100 (2011) 172–178

surface is dependent on pH value and adsorption amount of FA isapparently increased with the solution pH value increasing. Ligandexchange makes charge of magnetite surface reverse even though theadsorbed FA carries negative charges. Flocculation sedimentation isaccompanied with the FA adsorption onto magnetite. And theflocculation sedimentation may be influenced by adsorbed FAfractions. The adsorption shows that ligand exchange, hydrophobicinteractions and electrostatic attraction are contributive to theadsorption, while ligand exchange and hydrophobic interactionsdominate the mechanisms.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Science Fund forDistinguished Young Scholars (no. 50725416), the Key Program inNational Science and Technology Pillar Program during the 11th Five-year Plan Period of China (2008BAB32B06), the National NaturalScience Foundation of China (no. 50804059) and Graduate Degree

Thesis Innovation Foundation of Hunan Province and Central SouthUniversity (CX2010B063).

References

Allen, A.P., 1989. The role of binders in the agglomeration of minerals. Proceeding of 5thInternational Symposium on Agglomeration, UK, pp. 215–223.

Brunauer, S., Emmett, P.H., Teller, E., 1938. Adsorption of gases inmultimolecular layers.Am. Chem. Soc. 60, 309–319.

Chi, F.H., Amy, G.L., 2004. Kinetic study on the sorption of dissolved natural organicmatter onto different aquifer materials: the effects of hydrophobicity andfunctional groups. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 274 (2), 380–391.

Davis, J.A., 1982. Adsorption of natural dissolved organic matter at the oxiderwaterinterface. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 46, 2381–2393.

Dennis, L.M., David, J.E., 1989. Development and production of organic-limestonepellets. Ironmaking Conference Proceeding, pp. 715–732.

Fu, H., Xie, Q., 2006. Complexes of fulvic acid on the surface of hematite, goethite, andakaganeite: FTIR observation. Chemosphere 63 (3), 403–410.

Greenland, D.J., 1971. Interactions between humic and fulvic acids and clays. Soil Sci.111, 34–41.

Gu, B., Schmitt, J., Chen, Z., Liang, L., McCarthy, J.F., 1995. Adsorption and desorption ofdifferent organic matter fractions on iron oxide. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 59,219–229.

Page 7: A further study on the interaction between one of organic active fractions of the MHA binder and iron ore surface

178 T. Jiang et al. / International Journal of Mineral Processing 100 (2011) 172–178

Haas, A.L., Aldinger, J.A., Zahl, R.K., 1989. Effectiveness of organic binders for iron orepelletization. Report of Investigations, United States Bureau of Mines, No. 9230.

Han, G.H., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., Li, G., Jiang, T., 2010. Adsorption behaviors of humicsubstances onto iron ore particle surface. XXV Internaltional Mineral ProcessingCongress, Brisbane, pp. 163–171.

Hogg, R., 2000. Flocculation and dewatering. Int. J. Miner. Process. 58, 223–236.Hunter, R.J., 1981. Zeta Potential in Colloid Science: Principles and Applications.

Academic Press, New York.Jiang, T., Qiu, G., Zhu, D., Fan, X., Huang, Z., 2001. A new process of coal-based direct

reduction of iron concentrate pellets-CBP process. Proceedings of 60th IronmakingConference, Baltimore, pp. 803–808.

Jiang, T., Qiu, G.Z., Xu, J.C., Zhu, D.Q., Singh, R., 2007. Direct Reduction of CompositeBinder Pellets and Use of DRI. Electrotherm LTD, India.

Jiang, T., Han, G., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., Li, G., Guo, Yu., Yang, Y., 2011. Improvingextraction yield of humic substances from lignite with anthraquinone in alkalinesolution. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 18, 68–72.

Li, A.M., Xu, M.J., Li, W.H., Wang, X.J., Dai, J.Y., 2008. Adsorption characterizations offulvic acid fractions onto kaolinite. J. Environ. Sci. 20, 528–535.

Mahir, A., Mecit, K., Mehmet, D., Ozkan, D., 2005. Zeta potentials of perlite samples invarious electrolyte and surfactant media. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng.Aspects 259, 155–166.

Mcknight, D.M., Bencala, K.E., Zellweger, G.W., Aiken, G.R., Feder, G.L., Thorn, K.A., 1992.Sorption of dissolved organic carbon by hydrous aluminum and iron oxidesoccurring at the confluence of Deer Creek with the Snake River, Summit County,Colorado. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26, 1388–1396.

Meier, M., Ksenija, N.D., Maurice, P.A., Chin, Y.P., Aiken, G.R., 1999. Fractionation aquaticnatural organic matter upon sorption to goethite and kaolinite. Chem. Geol. 157,275–284.

Murphy, E.M., Zachara, J.M., Smith, S.C., 1990. Influence of mineral-bound humicsubstances on the sorption of hydrophobic organic compounds. Environ. Sci.Technol. 24, 1507–1516.

Murr, D.L., Englund, D.J., 1989. Development and production of organic-limestonepellets. The 56th Iron-making Conference Proceeding, pp. 715–732.

Namjesnik, D.K., Maurice, P.A., Aiken, G.R., Cabaniss, S., Chin, Y.P., Pullin, M.J., 2000.Adsorption and fractionation of a muck fulvic acid on kaolinite and goethite at pH3.7, 6, and 8. Soil Sci. 165, 545–559.

Ochs, M., Cosovic, B., Stumm, W., 1994. Coordinative and hydrophobic interactions ofhumic substances with hydrophilic Al2O3 and hydrophobic mercury surfaces.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 58, 639–650.

Teermann, I.P., Jekel, M.R., 1999. Adsorption of humic substances onto beta-FeOOH andits chemical regeneration. Water Sci. Technol. 40 (9), 199–206.

Thurman, E.M., Malcolm, R.L., 1981. Preparative isolation of aquatic humic substances.Environ. Sci. Technol. 15 (4), 463–466.

Tipping, E., 1981. Adsorption by goethite (α-FeOOH) of humic substances from threedifferent lakes. Chem. Geol. 33, 81–89.

Wagner, C.D., Ringgs, W.M., 1979. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy.Perkin-Elmer Corporation.

Wang, D., 1994. Flotation Reagents — Fundamental and Applications. MetallurgicalIndustry Press, Beijing. (In Chinese).

Yang, K., Lin, D.H., Xing, B.S., 2009. Interactions of humic acid with nanosized inorganicoxides. Langmuir 25, 3571–3576.

Zhang, Y., Han, G., Jiang, T., Huang, Y., Li, G., Guo, Yu., Yang, Y., 2011. Structurecharacteristics and adhesive property of humic substances extracted with differentmethods. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 18, 1041–1046.

Zhou,Q.,Maurice, P.A., Cabaniss, S.E., 2001. Size fractionationuponadsorptionof fulvic acidon goethite: equilibrium and kinetic studies. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 65, 803–812.


Recommended