+ All Categories
Home > Documents > A MERICAN A RT M USEUM Northeast, United States

A MERICAN A RT M USEUM Northeast, United States

Date post: 25-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: mieko
View: 34 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Sean Felton | Structural Advisor: Sustersic AE Senior Thesis 2013. A MERICAN A RT M USEUM Northeast, United States. Final Presentation Outline. Building Introduction Problem Background Proposed Structural System Architecture Considerations Comparative Summary. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
27
AMERICAN ART MUSEUM Northeast, United States Sean Felton | Structural Advisor: Sustersic AE Senior Thesis 2013
Transcript
Page 1: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

AMERICAN ART MUSEUMNortheast, United States

Sean Felton | StructuralAdvisor: Sustersic

AE Senior Thesis 2013

Page 2: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

FINAL PRESENTATION OUTLINE

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural

System• Architecture

Considerations• Comparative SummaryAMERICAN ART MUSEUM

Northeast, United States

Page 3: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

N

OVERVIEW• Fully-Functional Facility• 220,000 sq. ft.• 150’ tall• 9 Stories, Varying Floor Heights• May 2011 – December 2014• Design-Bid-Build; Single Prime

Contract• $266,345,323 GMP

www.maps.google.com

N

N

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

• Building Introduction• Building Overview• Project Team

• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 4: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

PROJECT TEAM

www.maps.google.com

N

Owner:General Contractor:

Design Architect:

Executive Architect:

Structural Engineer:

Geotechnical:

Not DisclosedTurner ConstructionRenzo Piano Building WorkshopCooper, Robertson & PartnersRobert Silman AssociatesURS Corporation

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

N

N

• Building Introduction• Building Overview• Project Team

• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 5: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

PROBLEM STATEMENT

N• 4 Columns Exposed• Column 3-M.5 is Last Support• Exists outside Building

Envelope• Architect Request for Removal

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

• Building Introduction• Problem Background

• Existing System• SE Corner Cantilever• Problem Statement

• Proposed Structural System• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 6: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

SOLUTION GOALS

N• Structural Stability without 3-M.5• Serviceability• Minimize Architectural Impact• Minimize Weight and Cost• Work within Precedence• Provide Enough Evidence for

Decision

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X• Foundations• Deflections

• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 7: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

CURRENT LOAD PATH

• Floor N-S• Truss 0.9• Trusses H, J, L• 3-M.5, PG46-2

NAMERICAN ART MUSEUM

N

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path

Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X• Foundations• Deflections

• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 8: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

PROPOSED LOAD PATH

• Floor N-S• Truss 0.9• Trusses H, N.2• Truss X• Truss J

NAMERICAN ART MUSEUM

N

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path

Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X• Foundations• Deflections

• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 9: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

• 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5S• No Composite Action• Concentric Connections• No Impact on Lateral

System

MODELING ASSUMPTIONS

• Individual Models• Itemized Reactions• P-D Effects not Considered• Deflections Checked Separate

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X• Foundations• Deflections

• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 10: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

TRUSS X

• Point Loads at Panel Points• Level 4 Beams for Bracing• Truss J resists uplift

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

42’ 31’ 11’

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X

• Overview• Custom Members• Summary

• Foundations• Deflections

• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 11: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

TRUSS X• Mu = 40,700

ft-k• Vu = 3200

k• Tu = 1580

k

Level 5D = 1340 kL = 945 kS = 2 k

Pu = 3200 k

42’ 31’ 11’

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X

• Overview• Custom Members• Summary

• Foundations• Deflections

• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 12: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

TRUSS X• Mu = 40,700

ft-k• Vu = 3200

k• Tu = 1580

k42’ 31’ 11’

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X

• Overview• Custom Members• Summary

• Foundations• Deflections

• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Level 5D = 1340 kL = 945 kS = 2 k

Pu = 3200 k

Page 13: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

TRUSS X

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

 PG56-1 CapacityLb 20 ft fMn 41571 ft-kD 56 in fVn 3402 kB 24 in fTn 25245 ktf 10 in fPn 27541 k

tw 2.25 in

• Mu = 40,700 ft-k• Vu = 3200 k• Tu = 1580 k• Achieves 94% Efficiency 42’ 31’ 11’

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X

• Overview• Custom Members• Summary

• Foundations• Deflections

• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Level 5D = 1340 kL = 945 kS = 2 k

Pu = 3200 k

Page 14: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

TRUSS X

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

42’ 31’ 11’

Shape Lu fMn fPn fTn

15A 25 750 2421

2295

15B 25 624 2161

1685

22 25 1714

4389

3545

D = 3392 kL = 2419 kS = 4 kPU = 7943 k 24R-1fPn= 8272 k 

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X

• Overview• Custom Members• Summary

• Foundations• Deflections

• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 15: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

TRUSS X

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

42’ 31’ 11’

PipeDo 24 in

t 1.75 inConcrete

f'c 15000 psify 150 ksi

no. 11  n 16  

CapacityfPn 8272 kfTn 8053 k

fMn 2754ft-k

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X

• Overview• Custom Members• Summary

• Foundations• Deflections

• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

D = 3392 kL = 2419 kS = 4 kPU = 7943 k 24R-1fPn= 8272 k 

Page 16: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

TRUSS X

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

42’ 31’ 11’

• Multiple Custom Sections• PG56-1• PG46-3• 24R-1

• W14x 68 – W14x455 – W27x539

• Eccentricity Issues

• Final Weight : 121.6 t

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X

• Overview• Custom Members• Summary

• Foundations• Deflections

• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 17: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

TRUSS SUPPORTS

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

H J L M.5 N.2

3

4

6

D = -350 kL = -252 kS = -1 kTU = -823 k W14x74fTn= -981 k 

D = 429 kL = 179 kS = 2 kPU = 802 k 15-BfPn= 2161 k D = -973 kL = -179 kS = -6 kTU = -1206 k 15-BfTn= -1685 k 

Shape Lu fMn fPn fTn

15A 25 750 2421

2295

15B 25 624 2161

1685

22 25 1714

4389

3545

D = -906 kL = -572 kS = -16 kTU = -2009 k 15-AfTn= 2295 k 

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X• Foundations

• Truss Supports• Caissons

• Deflections• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 18: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

TRUSS SUPPORTS

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

H J L M.5 N.2

3

4

6

D = 3392 kL = 2419 kS = 4 kPU = 7943 k 24R-1fPn= 8272 k 

D = 2479 kL = 1661 kS = 34 kPU = 5646 k 24R-1fPn= 8272 k

PipeDo 24 in

t 1.75 inConcrete

f'c 15000 psify 150 ksi

no. 11  n 16  

CapacityfPn 8272 kfTn 8053 k

fMn 2754ft-k

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X• Foundations

• Truss Supports• Caissons

• Deflections• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 19: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

FOUNDATIONS

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

1

2

3

D+H+F+L+S+T

H J L M.5 N.2

3

4

6

TU = -248 t (2) #1Ta = -302 t 

PU = 3022 t (5) #2Pa = 3726 t 

PU = 378 t (1) #1Pa = 414 t 

PU = 2191 t (4) #2Pa = 2484 t 

TU = -470 t (3) #2Ta = -681 t 

TU = -675 t (2) #1Ta = -302 t 

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X• Foundations

• Truss Supports• Caissons

• Deflections• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 20: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

DEFLECTIONS & SERVICEABILITY

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

DLL = 2.85 inDTL = 7.57 in

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System

• Solution Goals• Load Path Comparison• Design Assumptions• Truss X• Foundations• Deflections

• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

• Cantilever = 45’-10”• IBC Chapter 16• Live Load = (½) x l/360 =

l/180• Total Load = (½) x l/240 =

l/120

Page 21: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

ARCHITECTURE CONSIDERATIONS

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

• Minimize Impact of Architecture• Open Office Spaces• Panel Module Alignment• Architectural Envelope• Façade and Glazing

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System• Architecture

Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 22: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

PANEL MODULE ALIGNMENT

26’ 44’

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System• Architecture

Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 23: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

PANEL MODULE ALIGNMENT

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System• Architecture

Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 24: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

PANEL MODULE ALIGNMENT

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System• Architecture

Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 25: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

COMPARATIVE SUMMARY

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 26: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

• The Owner• Turner Construction

• The AE Faculty• Classmates

• Family, Friends

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary

Page 27: A MERICAN  A RT  M USEUM Northeast, United  States

JURY QUESTIONS?

AMERICAN ART MUSEUM

• Building Introduction• Problem Background• Proposed Structural System• Architecture Considerations• Comparative Summary


Recommended