PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
A Modified QuEChERS Approach to the Isolation and Determination of Drugs in
Food Products
Joan Stevens, Ph.D., Sample Preparation Applications Chemist, Agilent Technologies
Introduction
QuEChERS What, when, why, and how Basic procedure Detection approaches
Advancements in QuEChERS Extractions areas of investigation research and procedure analysis and data
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
QuEChERS
Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Robust and Safe
Developed by the US FDA and EU Food Regulatory Agencies
Procedure was validated in 2003, “toddler stage” Extraction and analysis of pesticides in food product
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
QuEChERS
Majority of current method for pesticides in food use SPE SPE requires multiple methods for specific classes of
compounds A single QuEChERS method can extract 250+ pesticides Amenable to GC/MS and LC/QQQ analysis
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Why is QuEChERS?• Reduced solvent, reduced labor, increased lab
productivity
Page 5
Standard SPE Methods QuEChERS Method
Sample Processing: 120 min. 30 min. 25% of the time
Solvent usage: 60-90 ml Solvent usage: 10-15 ml
Chlorinated Solvents: 20-30 ml Chlorinated Solvents: None
PittCon 2010
March 3rd, (2000-7)
Advantages of Dispersive SPE Over Standard SPE
Dispersive SPE =
No SPE Apparatus No Flow Control
No SPE Cartridges No Elution Solvent
No Vacuum No Dilution of Extract
No pretreatment No Solvent Evaporation
No Channeling Less Sorbent
No Drying Out Less Time
No Collection Less Cost
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Detection Methods
Past detection methods LC, GC possibly LC/MS Limited selectivity and sensitivity Required exhaustive sample preparation
Modern detection methods: LC/QQQ, GC/MS, GC/QQQ Exponential increase in selectivity and sensitivity Advancements in detector technology GC compound selective libraries Minimal sample preparation “JUST ENOUGH”
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Advancements in QuEChERS Extractions
“Toddler Stage” Designed for pesticide residue analysis Why stop there? Food SafetyAntibiotics in fish and animal productionSteroids in animal and soilMycotoxins, fungicides in grains and dried foodPCB, PAH in fish
Pharmaceuticals in biologicals
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Antibiotics in Animal Food-Stuff
Food products SPE sample preparation, difficult Extraction (LLE) and SPE
Implementing QuEChERS Quick, easy and less solvent consumption Quinolones and sulfonamides in liver Antibiotics used in animal husbandry Established limits within countries
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Weigh 2 g homogenized liver sample ( 0.05 g) in 50 mL centrifuge tube
Spike 50 µL of IS spike solution, 50 µL of QC spike solution if necessary, vortex 30 sec
Centrifuge @ 4000rpm for 5 min at 4 C
Transfer 1 mL of ACN layer to SampliQ QuEChERS dispersive-SPE 2 mL tube, drug residues in meat
Vortex 1 min, centrifuge @ 13000rpm for 3 min with micro-centrifuge
Add 10 mL of 5% FA in ACN, and shake vigorously for 30 sec
Add SampliQ EN QuEChERS extraction kit, and shake vigorously for 1 min
Transfer 800 µL extract to another tube, blow down @ 40 C with N2
Sample are ready for LC/MS/MS analysis
Add 8 mL of 30 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.0, vortex.
Reconstitute into 800 µL 1:9 MeOH/H2O w/ 0.1% FA, vortex and sonicate 10 min
Filter samples w/ 0.22µm Cellulose Acetate Spin Filter
Figure 1. Flow chart of QuEChERS procedure for the determination of quinolones in bovine liver
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Neat extracts by EN extraction kit onlyNeat extracts by AOACextraction kit onlyNeat extracts by Originalextraction kit only
Figure 2. Feasibility test results 1: chromatograms comparison of the neat extracts (no dispersive SPE) obtained by SampliQ QuEChERS EN extraction kit , AOAC extraction kit, and Original extraction kit.
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Figure 3. Feasibility test 2. Analytes peak area comparison for the neat extract processed by different Procedures. Comparisons include pure ACN and acidified ACN, with and without PSA dispersive SPE.
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000 A) 5% FA ACN, No Dispersive SPEB) 5% FA ACN, C18 Dispersive SPEC) 5% FA ACN, C18 + PSA Dispersive SPED) ACN, No dispersiveE) ACN, C18 + PSA Dispersive SPE
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Pipemidic acid Ofloxacin Ciprofloxacin Danofloxacin
EnrofloxacinLomefloxacin Sarafloxacin Cinoxacin
Oxolinic acid Nalidixic acid FlumequineNorfloxacin (IS)
Figure 4. Chemical structures of the quinolone antibiotics
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Figure 5. LC/MS/MS Chromatograms of A) liver blank extract, and B) 5 ng/g fortified liver extract (LOQ). Peaks identification: 1. Pipemidic acid, 2. Ofloxacin, 3. Ciprofloxacin, 4. Danofloxacin, 5. Lomefloxacin, 6. Enrofloxacin, 7. Sarafloxacin, 8. Cinoxacin, 9., Oxolinic acid, 10. Nalidixic acid, 11. Flumequine,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
98
10 11
A
B
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
Pipe
mid
ic a
cid
Oflo
xaci
n
Cip
roflo
xaci
n
Dan
oflo
xaci
n
Lom
eflo
xaci
n
Enro
floxa
cin
Sara
floxa
cin
Cin
oxac
in
Oxo
linic
aci
d
Nal
idix
ic a
cid
Flum
equi
ne
Recovery and ReproducibilityR
ecov
ery
Figure 6:Recoveries for the 11 Quinolones from Bovine Liver
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Table 1: Recovery and Repeatability of Quinolones in Fortified Liver 2 mL Dispersive-SPE tube
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Resulting New Dispersive-SPE Kits for Quinolones in Food-stuffs
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
2 mL tubes: 25 mg C18, 150 mg MgSO4
15 mL tubes: 150 mg C18, 900 mg MgSO4
Sulfadizine Sulfathiazole Sulfamerazine
SulfamethazineSulfamethizole Sulfamethoxypyridazine
Sulfachloropyridazine Sulfamethoxazole Sulfadimethoxin Sulfapyridine (IS)
Figure 7. Chemical structures of the sulfonamide antibiotics investigated in this study.
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Weigh 2g homogenized liver sample ( 0.05g) in 50mL centrifuge tube
Spike 50 µL of IS spike solution, 50µL of QC spike solution if necessary vortex 30 s
Add 8mL of water, vortex.
Add 10mL of 1% AA in ACN, and shake vigorously for 30s
Centrifuge @ 4000 rpm for 5 min
Transfer 6 mL of upper ACN layer to SampliQ EN QuEChERS fatty dispersive-SPE 2 mL tube
Vortex 2 min, centrifuge @ 4000 rpm for 5 min
Add SampliQ EN QuEChERS extraction kit, and shake vigorously for 1min
Transfer 4 mL extract to another tube, blow down @ 40 C with N2
Sample are ready for LC/MS/MS analysis
Reconstitute into 800 µL 1:9 MeOH/H2O w/ 0.1% FA, vortex and sonicate
Filter samples w/ 0.22 µm Cellulose Acetate Spin Filter
Figure 8. QuEChERS procedure for the determination of sulfonamides in bovine liver.
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
A
B
1 2
IS
3
4
5 6
78
9
Figure 9. LC/MS/MS Chromatograms of A) liver blank extract, and B) 100 ng/g fortified liver extract. Peaks identification: 1.Sulfadizine, 2. Sulfathiazole, 3. Sulfamerazine, 4. Sulfamethizole, 5. Sulfamethazine, 6. Sulfamethoxypyridazine, 7. Sulfachloropyridazine, 8. Sulfamethoxazole, 9., Sulfadimethoxin, IS (internal standard). Sulfapyridine.
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Sulfa
dizi
ne
Sulfa
thia
zole
Sulfa
mer
azin
e
Sulfa
met
hizo
le
Sulfa
met
hazi
ne
Sulfa
met
hoxy
pyrid
azin
e
Sulfa
chlo
ropy
ridaz
ine
Sulfa
met
hoxa
zole
Sulfa
dim
etho
xin
Recovery and ReproducibilityR
ecov
ery
Figure 10: Recoveries for the 9 Sulfonamides in Bovine Liver
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Table 2: Recovery and repeatability of sulfonamides in fortified bovine liver, 2 mL dispersive-SPE tube
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)
Conclusion: QuEChERS Advancements/Modifications
Data presented shows that the QuEChERS methodology can be used for other residues besides pesticides
Very large scope of possibilities: food, pharma, enviro
Very simple sample preparation technique, “Just Enough” sample preparation”
Relatively green and very cost effective technique when compared to Liquid-Liquid Extraction and Solid Phase Extraction
PittCon 2010March 3rd, (2000-7)