+ All Categories
Home > Documents > A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Date post: 23-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: egan
View: 33 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation. Uday Jagadisan Neeraj Gandhi University of Pittsburgh. Sensorimotor function – a balance hypothesis. Typical oculomotor behaviour displays an alternating pattern of gaze shifts and fixations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
22
A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation Uday Jagadisan Neeraj Gandhi University of Pittsburgh
Transcript
Page 1: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Uday JagadisanNeeraj GandhiUniversity of Pittsburgh

Page 2: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Typical oculomotor behaviour displays an alternating pattern of gaze shifts and fixations

Balanced exchange of activity in the brain between inhibitory networks that maintain fixation and excitatory networks that generate gaze shifts

Balance shift towards increased inhibition difficulty or delay in initiating movements

Balance shift towards increased excitation lack of movement suppression (behaviour as seen in disorders such as ADHD, Schizophrenia)

Sensorimotor function – a balance hypothesis

Page 3: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Model - Reciprocal inhibition in the superior colliculus (SC)

(illustration from Munoz & Fecteau, 2002)

C

Page 4: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Biasing the rostro-caudal balance in SC Objective: Perturb the balance between rostral SC and caudal SC on a trial-by-trial

basis while recording activity in both networks cannot use microstimulation (difficult to stimulate and record in the same place) cannot use inactivation (recovery over long time-scales)

Can we use the blink reflex to our advantage? Omnipause neurons (OPNs) in the PPRF have been shown to shut off during blinks,

linked to loopy eye movement associated with blink

Like the OPNs, cells in the rostral SC show a reduction in activity related to saccades – can they also be turned off using blinks?

If so, what are the consequences of this on the caudal network?

Schultz, et al. (2010)

Page 5: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Single units in rostral and caudal SC (intermediate layers) of monkey (macaca mulatta)

Delayed saccade (overlap 500-1200 ms) paradigm Air-puff delivered at random time on ~25% of trials; analysis focuses on

blinks during initial fixation (Fixation Blinks) Saccade target – IN or OUT of response field

caudal

rostral

SC

Experimental Methods

TIME (ms)

Target

Fixation Point

Eye

Air-puffEye lid

Page 6: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Single units in rostral and caudal SC (intermediate layers) of monkey (macaca mulatta)

Delayed saccade (overlap 500-1200 ms) paradigm Air-puff delivered at random time on ~25% of trials; analysis focuses on

blinks during initial fixation (Fixation Blinks) Saccade target – IN or OUT of response field

Experimental Methods

TIME (ms)

Target

Fixation Point

Eye

Air-puffEye lid

For more on these trials, please visit my poster on Monday afternoon (QQ13 489.01)

Page 7: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Activity in the rostral SC – control vs fixation blink

-400 0 1000

25

50

75

100

Time from blink onset (ms)

Activ

ity (s

pikes

/s)

ControlFixation Blink

5 deg

-400 -200 0Time from saccade onset (ms)

Start of blink

End of blink

n = 449Suppression lasts past the blink into the delay period …

… even as the eyes are stable.

Page 8: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Activity in the rostral SC – Summary (4 neurons)

Significant

1 2 3 40

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

1 2 3 4Cell Number

Activ

ity (s

pike

s/s)

Delayperiod During saccade

-500 0 7000

25

50

75

100

Time from target onset (ms)

Activ

ity (s

pike

s/s)

-400 -200 00

25

50

75

100

Activ

ity (s

pikes

/s)

Time from saccade onset (ms)

p < 0.0001 p > 0.05ControlFixation Blink

C

Page 9: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Activity in the rostral SC – Summary (4 neurons)

Significant

1 2 3 40

20

40

60

0

20

40

60

1 2 3 4Cell Number

Activ

ity (s

pike

s/s)

Delayperiod During saccade

-500 0 7000

25

50

75

100

Time from target onset (ms)

Activ

ity (s

pike

s/s)

-400 -200 00

25

50

75

100

Activ

ity (s

pikes

/s)

Time from saccade onset (ms)

p < 0.0001 p > 0.05ControlFixation Blink

C

Page 10: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

-100 0 100 200 7000

100

200

300

400

500 ControlFixation Blink

n = 440n = 75

Time from target onset (ms)

Activ

ity (s

pikes

/s)

Increased activity in the visual response

Activity in the caudal SC – visual and delay activity

Page 11: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Activity in the caudal SC – visual and delay activity Control

Fixation Blinkn = 540n = 73

-100 0 100 200 7000

100

200

Time from target onset (ms)

ControlFixation Blink

n = 440n = 75

-100 0 100 200 7000

100

200

300

400

500

Time from target onset (ms)

Activ

ity (s

pike

s/s)

-100 0 100 200 7000

40

80

120

ControlFixation Blink

n = 168n = 42

Time from target onset (ms)

Activ

ity (s

pike

s/s)

Activ

ity (s

pike

s/s)

-100 0 100 200 7000

100

200

300

ControlFixation Blink

n = 307n = 7

Time from tar

Periods of increased activity

Page 12: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Activity in the caudal SC – saccade-related burst

-500 -100 0 100 300

500

400

300

200

100

0

Time from saccade onset (ms)

Activ

ity (s

pike

s/s)

ControlFixation Blink

n = 540n = 73

-500 -100 0 100 3000

100

200

300

400

500

600

700 ControlFixation Blink

n = 440n = 75

Time from saccade onset (ms)

Activ

ity (s

pike

s/s)

-500 -100 0 100 3000

100

200

300

400

500

600 ControlFixation Blink

n = 307n = 7

Time from saccade onset (ms)

Activ

ity (s

pike

s/s)

-500 -100 0 100 3000

50

100

150

200

250

300 ControlFixation Blink

n = 168n = 42

Time from saccade onset (ms)

Activ

ity (s

pi

Page 13: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Activity in the caudal SC – Summary (17 neurons, 2 monkeys)

0 100200 700Time from target onset (ms)

Activity incontrol trials

-500 -100 0 100 300Time from saccade onset (ms)

0 200 400 6000

200

400

600

10 10010

100

500

500(log-log)

Activity incontrol trials

Page 14: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

0 100200 700Time from target onset (ms)

Activity incontrol trials

-500 -100 0 100 300Time from saccade onset (ms)

0 200 400 6000

200

400

600

10 10010

100

500

500(log-log)

Activity incontrol trials

Activity in the caudal SC – Summary (17 neurons, 2 monkeys)

Page 15: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

0 200 500 1000 0 200 500

0.15

0.1

0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

Time from target onset (ms)

Propo

rtion

of tr

ials i

n eac

h bin

Time from GO cue (ms)

ControlFixation blink -correctFixation blink - early

0

Behaviour – early (delay period) saccades

Story so far ...

What happens on these trials?

Page 16: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000

100

200

300

400

Time from target onset (ms)

Activ

ity (

spik

es/s)

ControlFixation Blink -correct

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Time from target onset (ms)

Activ

ity (

spik

es/s)

ControlFixation Blink - correct

Increased excitability associated with early saccades

Page 17: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000

100

200

300

400

Time from target onset (ms)

Activ

ity (

spik

es/s)

ControlFixation Blink -correctFixation Blink - early

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Time from target onset (ms)

Activ

ity (

spik

es/s)

ControlFixation Blink - correctFixation Blink - early

Increased excitability associated with early saccades

Page 18: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Blinks during fixation lead to reduced fixation network activity that persists for several hundred milliseconds even as the eye position is stable

The reduction of fixation network activity in the rostral SC may be related to the increased excitability in the response of neurons in caudal SC

We have established a model that can be used to study the balance between excitation and inhibition in the saccadic system

Summary

Page 19: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Acknowledgements

Thanks to

Lab Support Neeraj Gandhi Husam Katnani NIH Grant

EY015485 Gloria Foster Joe McFerron

Page 20: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

Thank you!

Page 21: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000

100

200

300

400

Time from target onset (ms)

Activ

ity (

spik

es/s)

ControlFixation Blink -correctFixation Blink - earlyGapTask

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Time from target onset (ms)

Activ

ity (

spik

es/s)

ControlFixation Blink - correctFixation Blink - earlyGapTask

Activity during “early” saccades

Page 22: A neural test bed for simulating executive control deficits in saccade generation

0 100 200 7000

25

50

75

100

Time from target onset (ms)

Activ

ity (s

pike

s/s)

ControlFixation Blink

0

25

50

75

100

Activ

ity (s

pike

s/s)

0 100 200 700Time from target onset (ms)

ControlFixation Blink

Tar

Increased activity in SC location opposite to target


Recommended