+ All Categories
Home > Documents > A New Direction for Public Power – Part II?

A New Direction for Public Power – Part II?

Date post: 30-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: mohawk
View: 23 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
A New Direction for Public Power – Part II?. Glenn Steiger General Manager, Glendale Water and Power. Questions to Explore. WHY Now? What Structure? What is the Future? How do we Proceed?. What’s Driving Change?. Technology Markets Economics Legislation Workforce issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
24
A New Direction for Public Power – Part II? Glenn Steiger General Manager, Glendale Water and Power
Transcript
Page 1: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

A New Direction for Public Power – Part II?

Glenn SteigerGeneral Manager, Glendale Water and Power

Page 2: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Questions to Explore

WHY Now? What Structure? What is the Future? How do we Proceed?

WHY Now? What Structure? What is the Future? How do we Proceed?

Page 3: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

What’s Driving Change?

Technology Markets Economics Legislation Workforce issues Changing political and social

environments Customer expectations

Page 4: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Why Change Now?

Page 5: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Why Change Now?

Federal: Legislative,Regulatory,Competitive Issues

Page 6: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Why Change Now?

City and State: Political Intervention

The “New”Politics!!

Anti Govt.Sentiments

Page 7: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Why Change Now?Markets, MarketsMarkets!

RECsCarbonCapacityEtc, Etc…

Page 8: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Why Change Now?

Expenditures tied to municipal needs

The Transfer!Is it still Legal??

TRANSFER

Page 9: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Why Change Now?ConflictingFunctions

Public Works…IS…Finance…Code Enforcement…

Page 10: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Why Change Now?

Departmental

Competition

And

Inappropriate allocations!

Page 11: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Why Change Now?

Out of jurisdiction restrictions on ROI

Page 12: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Why Change Now?

Technological revolution

Smart Grid anyone?

Page 13: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

WhatStructure?

Page 14: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

What Structure?

System Strategy Political Organizational Process Technological Managerial Financial

Approach for long-term survival incorporates a participative Business Approach for sustainable

solutions

Page 15: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Alternative Authorities?

Municipal Corporation Charter-Granted, Locally Owned PUC Exemption

Legislative Restructure Required

Metropolitan District Broad Range of Powers Provide All Services

Requires Change in Statute PUC Exemption

Solely Controlled by City

Page 16: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Alternative Authorities?

Special District Water, Wastewater, Electric, Gas

New Legislation Service Beyond City Limits

Multi-Community Entity Joint Powers, Muni. PUC Exempt Municipal Corporation Service Expansion

Page 17: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Governance and Management

Page 18: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Peer Trends

Orlando Utilities Commission (OUC) Appointed Five Member Commission

Set Rates and Operating Policies Pay “Franchise Fees” and “Taxes” to City City Council Involvement in Property and

Easement Issues Four Year Terms

Jacksonville Electric Authority (JEA) Seven Member Board of Directors

Public Meetings re Rates, Service Levels, Information, Purchasing Practices, etc.

City Council Liaison Four Year Terms

Page 19: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Peer Trends

Denver Water Board (DWB) Board of Water Commissioners (5)

Mayor-Appointed, Non City Council-Related Commission Appoints Manager who also

serves as Secretary Set Rates

Knoxville Utilities Board (KUB) Seven Commissioners

Mayor-Appointed, City Council Approved Commission Reports Semi-Annually to City

Council Minimal City Council Involvement Seven Year Terms

Page 20: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

WhatIs the Future?

Page 21: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

The Future?

Charter Review Joint Powers Authority? Joint Action Agency

Ownership Lease

Lease Back to municipality

Page 22: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

What is the Future?

Status quo?

Enterprise consolidation?

Sell out?

Lease back?

Sale of Capital Assets

Strong Commission structure

Page 23: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

How Do We Proceed?

Recommend that APPA coordinate a CEO-Level Task Force to:

Analyze the issues Create Business Model Options Provide assistance for moving to a

new business and governance paradigm

Page 24: A New Direction for  Public Power – Part II?

Got Ideas?


Recommended