A New Generation of Parton Distributions with Uncertainties from Global QCD Analysis
What’s new in this Global QCD Analysis of PDF’s? • New Data,
• New methods and techniques of analysis unable quantitative error treatments and reliable uncertainty studies: (J. Pumplin, D. Stump)
New Results and physical applications • New generation of CTEQ PDF’s: eigenvector sets
which characterize the behavior of overall χ2 in the neighborhood of the global minimum;
• Precision W/Z physics at the Tevatron/LHC • Parton Luminosities at
the Tevatron, LHC, RHIC, VLHC � predictions on X-sections and their uncertainties for Higgs-, top-productions, high pT jets, ... etc.
Outlook
J. Pumplin, D.R. Stump, J. Huston, H.L. Lai, P. Nadolsky, and W.K. Tung
Michigan State Univ. hep-ph/0201195
+ all available correlated systematic errors (old & new)
� �6 ��������� �j���
mjh���h(` Q�q u ^ O�k��$d V h0i u a>R�hCg�h ������ {�|%|%|����%|%}�� u Q1]\v] u1x�|��{%{�z{�������u Q�]\veQ\[ x�y%y%y%}%y! �z h"�h�#$J T%$ Q�k��jd V h%i u a�R�h g�h� ���&�� z%y%y%y���z�'%}(� u Q�]\vw] u1x�|%|{�z! ��%|�� h) h*#jK V JO>Q%k*+(h9i�K�RwP�K%d>MUK�O>M-,$h/.�J X Q V k0�$d V h9i u a�R�hg�h/ �213� z%y%y%y�� z! ��4� u Q1]\v3] u1x�|%|%y�5%}{�z���� +(h�i*K RwP>K�d>M�K%O>M4,$h.�J X Q V kH&Q�P u h$p�J T Q5o2�o�v |%} v y%} h�h lCh6"cK V"T3^ O�k87Zh(9 h:7�J�;%Q V"T R�kcr/h�g�h0m T3^ V ` ^ O>t�k<7Zh�mjhH u J V O>Q�k=�$d V h i u a�R�h g�h> ?��&@� z%y%y%y���{���� hr/h(Hch9 ^ Q1` Q K%O>M?mjh s9Q�` ` Q V k0i u a>R�h7$Q\N�hACB>DE� {�|%|�'��y%|! �y%z��F� u Q1]\v3] u1x�|�'%y����%|������ r�h�H h9 ^ Q1` Q�k mjh� h s9Q�` ` Q VK%O�M lCh> hjsjJ%R J>IZQ V k�G3i*K V T JOUl ^ R TWV ^ ;%d T3^ JO<,�d%O>P T3^ JO8H&O\vP�Q V T K ^ O T3^ Q\R�k I � u Q�]\vw] u1x�y{�y! �y%}%z�� hg�hjijd X ]%` ^ O�k&lCh07Zh*m T d X ]�K%O>M�r�h9s�h�H�d%O>t�k9i u a>R�h*7$Q\N�hAKJLBM� z%y%y%z���y{N �y{%{O� u Q�]\vw] u1x�y%y%y�'{�|{P� hg�h+ijd X ]%` ^ ORQ�S=TVU W"k�i u a�R�hL7$Q\N�h2AXJLB�� z%y%y%z���y{N �y{���� u Q1]\v] u1x�y{�y{�y��%z�� hlChY7Zh&m T d X ]@QVSZT�U W"k�i u a�R�hY7$Q\N�h[A\J�B]� z%y%y%z�� y{N �y{�z� u Q�]\vw] u1x�y{�y{�y%}{P� h
^
Global QCD Analysis in a Nutshell
Master Equation for QCD Parton Model
{ the Factorization Theorem
F�A(x;m
Q;M
Q) =X
a
faA(x;m
�) F̂�a (x;
Q
�;M
Q)+O((
�
Q)2)
FA
A
a
fAa
A
Fa^
H H
Sources of Uncertainties and Challenges:
� Experimental errors;
� Parametrization dependence;
� Higher-order corrections; Large Logarithms;
� Power-law (higher twist) corrections.
ExperimentalInput
Parton Dist. Fn.Non-Perturbative Parametrization at Q0
GLAP Evolution to Q
Hard Cross-sectionperturbative calculable
(may contain snLogn(M/Q))
(and uncertainties on errors!)
*, W, Z
q
g q
q
q
*, W, Z
g
q q
q
*, W, Z
(dir)
DIS
DY
Dir.Ph.
Jet Inc.
e N N
N N
p N N
k Np N
p N N
k Np N
p p
SLACBCDMS
NMC, E665H1, ZEUS
CDHS, CHARMCCFR
CHORUS
E605, E772NA51E866
CDF, D0
WA70, UA6E706
CDF, D0
CDF, D0
Experimental Input: Phyical Processes & Experiments
100
101
102
103
104
1/X
100
101
102
Q (GeV)
DIS
(fix
ed ta
rget
)H
ER
A (
’94)
DY
W-a
sym
met
ryD
irect
-γJe
ts
Th
e k
ine
ma
tic r
an
ge in
th
e (
x, Q
) p
lan
e o
f d
ata
po
ints
incl
ud
ed
in
a typ
ica
l glo
ba
l QC
D a
na
lysi
s –
CT
EQ
5
Whats new/old since CTEQ5?
New Data
◆ new DIS data fromH1/ZEUS
◆ jet cross sections fromD0 as a function of η
◆ updated E866 Drell-Yan deuteron/protonratio
◆ re-analyzed CCFR F2
Old data
◆ BCDMS DIS
◆ NMC DIS
◆ CCFR F3
◆ E665 DIS
◆ E605 DY
◆ CDF W asym
◆ CDF inclusive jets
now use measure-ments at separate energies with fullcorrelation info
������������ ������������ ������� �!�" #%$'&%(*) +-,/. &�(1032/&*4�5�) 06) 785
9�:;�< => ? @�ABDC ?�EGF�? H :I :? JK L C ? < 2NMO0�MF�? < 0*$�&O7�P QI ? <SR &*TN,�0�UV&WPDPX7�PXY) (378,�06) +ZM�./[\7NP]P^M/5�2�78+`_�M/a'(V(*) M�5b&�P\Pc7NPc('d
C ? < F/?'e I ? fV? g ) 0*$ h B f H <ji*k�l^m n :o �WpGqrs) 0*$t(1Q�(10V&W+ZM�06) u%&�P\Pc7NPc('dC ? < F�? B v H e�w�? fVx yXz\y^{ ? e}|>~ @�A
f ~ �/~ ? q#%$'&-4�0 06) 5���,WM�P�M�+�&O0V&WPc( g ) . .���& � v'�6�bB 0*$�&O7�Pc&O06) u'M/.�+�7�2/&�. H �W�/�� f ~ �bB u�7NPDPc&'u*06) 785'(�[�7�P�(1Q�(10V&W+ZM�06) u-&WPDPX7�PX( H U��a/�/. ) (O$�&�2�&OT/,/&WP\) +�&W5�0�M/.N&�P\Pc7NPc('�
� w ? ) (�0*$�&�� (10�M/5�2NM�Pc2Z2/&O��) M�06) 785���7�[�0*$�&3P^M/5�2�78+�a/5�uO7�P\P^&W. M�0V&�2&�P\Pc7NP U� � ~ ? ) (G0*$�&�� (10�M/5�2NM�Pc2�2/&*�/) MO06) 785���7�[�0*$�&���0*$ B u�78+-,/. &*0V&�. Qu�7NPDPc&�. MO0V&'2�� H (1Q�(10V&W+ZM�06) u-&WPDPX7�P�785 C ? U
�
#�7G0�M � &b) 5�017 M'u'uO78a/5�0 0*$�&%(1Q�(10V&W+ZM�06) u%&�P\Pc7NPc('d g &-2/&O4�5�&9�� : BDv ��� f ~ H < => ? @�A
� C ? E�� ~ f ~D�/~ ? EGF ? � :w :?e > ~
f :~ �M/5'2 +%) 5�) +%) �& g ) 0*$�Pc&�(O,�&'u*0 017 � f ~ � U�#Z$�&GP^&O(Oa/. 0�) (
f ~ < > ~�� �� k A
� ~D~ ��� ~ � � B (1Q�(10V&W+ZM�06) u%(O$�) [^0 Hg $'&�Pc& ~D~�� <�� ~D~�� e => ? @�A �/~
? �/~�� ?w :?� ~ < => ? @�A �/~ ? BDC ? EGF ? Hw :? q
��7�0V& 0*$WMO0b0*$�& f ~ � ( 2/&W,/&W5�2�785�0*$�& ������+�7�2/&�.�,WM�P^M/+�&*0V&�PX(� v'��� U�#Z$�&�59�: BDv � H < +%) 5 9�� : B\v ��� f ~ H� f ~ �
�
CTEQ6 pdfs
low Q high Q
� 78+-,WM�P�) (V785 7�[ � #�������� B 2NM'(O$�&�2 H 017 � #������ � B 2�7�0�� 2NM'(O$�&�2 H�����!� ( MO0�� < � _ &��3U B #Z$�&sa/5/. M/��&�. &�2 u�a/P �W&O( M�P^&��� M/5�2��< �� U H����� ���%CN <�����8�s�8��� � ����� >��8� � � � � �� � � � ���� ��8����� ������9�� ����� ?3���"�������
!
������ ����� �� ��
� � �� ��� �� �� ���
� ���
�� �� ���
�� ����� ����
�
���� �������� ������� �� �
� �� � �����
� �������� �
� �� � �� ��
���������� �
�
� �� �
���
�����
� �
! !
510
5010
050
010
00Q
2�G
eV2�
1
1.52
2.5
F2�x,Q2��offset
x�0.
0001
61
x�0.
0002
53
x�0.
0004
x�0.
0006
32x�0.
0008
x�0.
0010
2
x�0.
0013
x�0.
0016
1
x�0.
0021
x�0.
0025
3
x�0.
0032
x�0.
005
x�0.
008
ZE
US
data
low
xva
lues
1010
010
0010
000
Q2�G
eV2�
0
0.250.
5
0.751
1.251.
5
1.75
F2�x,Q2��offset
x�0.
013 x�
0.02
1
x�0.
032
x�0.
05
x�0.
08
x�0.
13
x�0.
18
x�0.
25
x�0.
4
x�0.
65
ZE
US
data
high
xva
lues
ComparisonoftheCTEQ6M
�ttotheZEUSdatainseparatexbins.�
The
datapointsincludetheestimatedcorrectionsforsystematicerrors.Theerror
barsarestatisticalerrorsonly.
�
ZEUSCollaboration:S.Chekanovetal.,Eur.Phys.J.C
21
(2001)443[hep-ex/0105090].
10
�4
�2
02
4�
i
020406080100
N
ZE
US
�4
�2
02
4�D
i�T
i��Α
i
020406080
N
ZE
US
Histogram
ofresidualsfortheZEUSdata.ThecurveisaGaussianofwidth
1.(a)�i=
(Di�X k
br k�ki�Ti)=�i.(b)Asimilarcomparisonbutwithoutthe
correctionsforsystematicerrorsonthedatapoints.
Dcorrected
i
=
Di�
K X k=1
b r k�ki
11
SystematicshiftsfortheZEUSdata(10systematicerrors)
k
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
^r k
1:67
�0:67
�1:25
�0:44
�0:00
�1:07
1:28
0:62
�0:40
0:21
SystematicshiftsfortheNMCdata(11systematicerrors)
k
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
^r k
0:67
�0:81
�0:35
0:25
0:05
0:70
�0:31
1:05
0:61
0:26
0:22
�2
�1
01
23
r�
1234
1234Z
EU
Ssh
ifts
�2
�1
01
23
r�
1234
1234N
MC
shif
ts
12
100
200
300
400
500
p T�G
eV�
0.00
001
0.00
1
0.110
d�dpT�nb�GeV�D
0Je
tcr
oss
sect
ion
100
200
300
400
500
p T�G
eV�
1.�
10�
6
0.00
01
0.011
100
d�dpT�nb�GeV�
CD
Fje
tcr
oss
sect
ion
Comparison
oftheCTEQ6M
�ttotheinclusivejetdata.�
(a)D�
(the
boundaryvaluesofthe5rapiditybinsare0;0:5;1:0;1:5;2:0and3:0).(b)
CDF(centralrapidity,0:1<j�j<0:7).
�
D�
Collaboration:B.Abbottetal.;CDFCollaboration:T.A�olderetal..
15
�data�theory��theory versus pT �GeV�
100 200 300 400 500�0.5
00.5
11.5
1Η1.5
100 200 300 400 500�0.5
00.5
11.5
0.5Η1
100 200 300 400 500�0.5
00.5
11.5
2Η3
100 200 300 400 500�0.5
00.5
11.5
0Η0.5
100 200 300 400 500�0.5
00.5
11.5
1.5Η2
Closer comparison between CTEQ6M and the D� jet data
as fractional di�erences.
The Tevatron inclusive jet cross section implies a
hard gluon: g(x) is large at large x.
Recall CTEQ4HJ and CTEQ5HJ.
16
CDFinclusivejetcrosssection
-50050100
(D-T)/T
CT
EQ
4M
Sta
tist
ical
Err
ors
on
ly
-50050100
CT
EQ
4HJ
-50050100
5010
015
020
025
030
035
040
0 GeV
Jet
Tra
nsv
erse
En
erg
y
MR
ST
100
200
300
400
pT�G
eV�
�0.
2
�0.
10
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
�cor
rect
edda
ta�
theo
ry��
theo
ry
CD
Fin
clus
ive
jet
CDFcollaboration:T.A�older,etal.
17
��������� ���� �� ������� ����������� ��
��������� ��!"��#$!��
X
a=
1
2
0
3
4
5
c2global
c20
+ Dc2
c20
X0
X-D X0
X+DX0
%'&�( )+*�,.-�/0)1 2436587:9�;<7= = >@?BA0CED FHG�2+D1JI�K+L
M NO�P� Q�R4��R$�SNOTU�V�E�P!'RXWYNO#B�
Z � 7+[�\]7^@[�A ��_ = `ba c�= a A.\ � Ad`de+>�Cgfih0>�^+jk`d\l7a ^@A0Cm5�a ^a 5�a n+7:o`ba >�^X`k>p>�q0`<7.a ^X`de@A�q�A:jk`Vr�`s7+js7Xt _ ^@h:`ba >�^X>tvug;Z W A:jwjda 7�^ � 70`d\]a 9 � Ad`de+>�C$fHAd9xc�= >x\lAy`de@ABz7@\]a 70`ba >�^$>t'G 20{�|.}a ^8`de@AO^@A@a [�e�q>x\~e+>�>�CO>t `de@A8[�= >�q.7�=�5�a ^a 5 _ 5�a ^�`de@As��C�a o5�A.^+jda >�^.7�='c.7@\l7�5�Ad`wA\Yj:c.7@h0Ax;
�k�
PDF Uncertainties
Use Hessian technique (T=10)
Gluon Uncertainty
Gluon is fairly well-constrained up to an x-value of 0.3
New gluon is stiffer thanCTEQ5M; not quite asstiff as CTEQ5HJ
102
√s
(G
eV)
Lum
inos
ity fu
nctio
n at
TeV
Run
II
Fractional Uncertainty
0.1
0.1
0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.20.2
Q-Q
-->
W+ (
W- )
Q-Q
-->
γ*
(Z)
G-G
0 0 0
^
≈ ≈≈≈
− −
0.3
0.4
200
400
5020
±
102
√s
(G
eV)
Lum
inos
ity fu
nctio
n at
TeV
Run
II
Fractional Uncertainty
0.1
0.1
0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
0.1
Q-G
-->
Z
0 0 0
^
≈ ≈≈≈
200
400
5020
-0.10
≈
Q-G
-->
W+
Q-G
-->
W-
Q-G
-->
γ*
≈
� ����� �� ��� �� ��� �� �2� � �� � �� ����� ������ �� ����� ��
�� � ������� ����������� �����'� �� � ����� '�� ���� �'
#@�
102
103
√s
(G
eV)
Lum
inos
ity fu
nctio
n at
LH
C
Fractional Uncertainty
0.1
0.1
0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.20.2
Q-Q
-->
W+
Q-Q
-->
W-G
-G
0 0 0
≈ ≈≈≈
− −
±
5020
050
0
^10
210
3
√s
(G
eV)
Lum
inos
ity fu
nctio
n at
LH
C
Fractional Uncertainty
0.1
0.1
0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
0.10 0 00
-0.1
Q-G
-->
W+
Q-G
-->
W-
Q-G
-->
Z
Q-G
-->
γ*
^50
500
200
≈≈ ≈
≈
≈≈
� ����� �� ��� �� ��� �� �2� � �� � �� ����� ������ ��
�
�
#�#
Outlook This is only the very beginning of studying uncertainties
in global QCD analysis in a quantitative manner This work demonstrates that the new techniques for
global analysis developed recently are viable and practical.
The new results are very useful for the physics programs of the Tevatron, Hera, and LHC,
There is a lot of room for collaboration among theorists and experimentalists
Many other sources of uncertainties in the overall global analysis have not yet been incorporated: Theoretical uncertainties due to higher-order PQCD
corrections and resummation; Uncertainties introduced by the choice of
parametrization have been explored extensively, but not yet quantitatively formulated.
Heavy quark effects and charm production data in NC and CC experiments will be systematically analyzed � More quantitative information on strange, charm, bottom distributions.
Continued progress in this venture is of vital importance for our understanding of the parton structure of hadrons (fundamental physics of its own right), for precision SM physics studies at future colliders, and for New Physics searches.
���������:�����'��� � ����� ����� �p� � i����� ��k������ ��NO_ \P7�^.7= � jda j�� M >�^+jda C�A.\H`de@A G 2�� jE>tJa ^@C�a z�a C _ 7=$A:9�c�A.\�a o5�A.^0`kj 70jJ7�^ � z7@\]a 7�q�= A he.7^@[�A0jpt \S>�5 a `kjgz.7�= _ Ai7:`P`de@A[�= >�q.7='5�a ^a 5 _ 5O;
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
dist
ance
Eigenvector 4
BC
DM
Sp
BC
DM
Sd
H1a
H1b
ZE
US
NM
Cp
NM
Cr
CC
FR2
CC
FR3
E60
5
CD
Fw
E86
6
D0j
et
CD
Fjet
Q ^+h+A.\�`<7.a ^0` � \]7^@[�A0j { z.A.\�`ba h+7�=�= a ^@A0j } t]>�\v`de@Apa ^�c _ `8A:9�c�A.\�a o5�A.^0`kj�7= >�^@[p`de@A ! a [�A.^0z.A0h:`k>x\ ��C�a \lA0h:`ba >�^�; R e@Ape+>�\]a n:>�^:o`<7=�= a ^@A:j�a ^@C�a h+70`wA�`de@A��~&�( )0*~,@-�/+)H1V; { � >�a ^0`kj��sc.>�jda `ba >�^+js>t5�a ^a 5 _ 5 G 2 t]>�\4a ^@C�a z�a C _ 7=�Ad9xcA\]a 5�A^0`kj }{ Cxa jk`<7�^@h0AH3�� FHG 2�! "$#&%' }
#�(
-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20-5
05
1015202530
CDFjet H33L-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
-202468
10CDFw H11L
-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
02468
E866 H15L-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
-505
101520
D0jet H90L-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
-505
101520
CCFR3 H87L-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
-505
1015202530
E605 H119L-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
0
2
4
6 NA51 H1L-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
0
10
20
30NMCr H123L
-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20-5
0
5
10
15NMCrx H13L
-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20-10
0102030
CCFR2 H69L-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
-100
10203040
H1b H126L-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
-100
10203040
ZEUS H229L-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
0
20
40
60 NMCp H201L-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
-200
204060
BCDMSp H339L-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
-20-10
010203040
BCDMSd H251L-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20
-100
1020304050
H1a H104L
��� � ��� ���� �� � ��� ���U����H�. x�0� �� �� �x����� �0����'�� P� � �4�� � ����� ���� �U��� �� � � �� � ��' �i� � ������ ���v������ ��'�� �w����� ��'�Y�� �j<h+7= A+C �
{ G 2��� %' ����� G 2G 2 }#"!
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40di
stan
ceEigenvector 18
BC
DM
Sp
BC
DM
Sd
H1a
H1b
ZE
US
NM
Cp
NM
Cr
CC
FR2
CC
FR3
E60
5
CD
Fw
E86
6
D0j
et
CD
Fjet
Q ^+h+A.\�`<7.a ^0` � \l7�^@[�A:j t�>x\ `de@A�a ^�c _ `sA:9�c�A.\�a 5�A.^0`kj87= >�^@[P`de@A! a [�A^0z@A+hd`k>�\yK��PC�a \lA0h:`ba >�^�;
��������� ������� ���:��� ��� � ���. �� � � �+���< �����J� ��� ��w���'�� ���w �@ ��w �4��� '��� ��� � �����������
�.� � � � �� �! "�#�$�%�#&' (� � ����� � ���� �� � ��� ������ ���v������ ��'�� �k��� � ��*)�)�))�)�) ���� � ���� � �������i� � �v��� �+ �� ��< �E ���������������g�. x�P� � ���4��� ���
� � ������ ����������� ����4� �'� ��Y ���� �v���E�'� -,.� �#(/
J. Huston
Compare CTEQ6 to MRST
Main difference is thegluon at high x
J. Huston
Compare CTEQ6 to MRST
Solid: CTEQ6M
Long-dashed: MRST2001
Short-dashed: MRST2001J
Dotted: MRST-like fit
J. Huston
Uncertainty in gluon at small Q
Note gluon can be negative at small xand large x
Evolves to positive by ~1.3 GeV
Dashed: CTEQ5MDotted: MRST2001Solid: CTEQ6M
J. Huston
Gluon evolution
CTEQ6M-like gluon atQ=1,2,5,100 GeV
MRST-like gluon at Q=1,2,5,100 GeV