+ All Categories
Home > Documents > A new method for fault detection and identification of ... poster 2015.pdf · Laboratoire...

A new method for fault detection and identification of ... poster 2015.pdf · Laboratoire...

Date post: 02-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: phungtruc
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
Laboratoire conventionné avec l’Université de Toulouse A new method for fault detection and identification of shadows based on electrical signature of defects M. BRESSAN 1 , Y. EL-BASRI 1 , C. ALONSO 1,2 1 CNRS; LAAS; 7 Avenue du Colonel Roche, F-31077, TOULOUSE, FRANCE. 2 UNIVERSITE DE TOULOUSE; UPS, INSA; LAAS; F-31400, TOULOUSE, FRANCE. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract The good diagnosis and monitoring of PV systems are key points to maximize PV production. The main objective of this work is to develop a new tool capable of detecting faults of PV systems in real-time, with a particular care for the detection and identification of shadows. The proposed detection method is based only on DC power measurements. Introduction The PV arrays may be completely or partially shaded, decreasing performances. The duration of the DC power drop is related to the type of shadow on PV modules such as soiling, building environment, leaves, etc. The aim of this work is to create a real-time fault detection by analyzing the DC power output and more particularly the impact of shadows. This detection method is designed to minimize the use of sensors due to economic constraints. The measurement of output current and voltage of the PV array is carried out by a monitoring system. With these measurements, the method is able to detect DC power losses and identify the nature of faults on PV arrays. PV system description Field Power PV modules Inclination Facade 38kWp Bi-glass 529Wp 65° South Experimental roof + walls “R+1” 35kWp TE2200 250Wp 0° to 90° South Roof “R+2” 24kWp TE2200 250Wp 10° South 08:24 09:36 10:48 12:00 13:12 14:24 15:36 16:48 18:00 19:12 20:24 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 DC power (W) (1) Reference (2) Variable shadows (tree) (3) Intermittent shadows (clouds) (4) Fixed shadows (soiling) (1) (2) (3) (4) Time DC power measuring box and DC power analysis DC Voltage Input max 1500V DC Current Input max 30A Necessity to develop a DC power fault detection in function of types of shadows on PV modules 1 DS2e-0190 Shadow source Table 1 : List of PV equipment of ADREAM platform Figure 1 : ADREAM platform, LAAS-CNRS, Toulouse, France Figure 2 : Schematic bloc of test bench for DC power measurement with measuring box Figure 3 : Analysis of the power behavior for each case of shadows Table 2 : Maximum input specifications of the DC measuring box
Transcript
Page 1: A new method for fault detection and identification of ... poster 2015.pdf · Laboratoire conventionné avec l’Université de Toulouse A new method for fault detection and identification

Laboratoire

conventionné avec

l’Université de Toulouse

A new method for fault detection and identification

of shadows based on electrical signature of defectsM. BRESSAN1, Y. EL-BASRI1, C. ALONSO1,2

1 CNRS; LAAS; 7 Avenue du Colonel Roche, F-31077, TOULOUSE, FRANCE.2 UNIVERSITE DE TOULOUSE; UPS, INSA; LAAS; F-31400, TOULOUSE, FRANCE.

E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

AbstractThe good diagnosis and monitoring of PV systems are key points to maximize PV production. The main objective of this work is todevelop a new tool capable of detecting faults of PV systems in real-time, with a particular care for the detection andidentification of shadows. The proposed detection method is based only on DC power measurements.

Introduction

The PV arrays may be completely or partially shaded, decreasing performances. The duration of the DC power drop is related tothe type of shadow on PV modules such as soiling, building environment, leaves, etc.

The aim of this work is to create a real-time fault detection by analyzing the DC power output and more particularly the impactof shadows. This detection method is designed to minimize the use of sensors due to economic constraints. The measurement ofoutput current and voltage of the PV array is carried out by a monitoring system. With these measurements, the method is ableto detect DC power losses and identify the nature of faults on PV arrays.

PV system description

Field Power PV modules

Inclination

Facade 38kWp Bi-glass 529Wp

65° South

Experimental roof + walls

“R+1”

35kWp TE2200 250Wp

0° to 90° South

Roof “R+2” 24kWp TE2200 250Wp

10° South

08:24 09:36 10:48 12:00 13:12 14:24 15:36 16:48 18:00 19:12 20:240

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

300

DC

pow

er

(W)

(1) Reference

(2) Variable shadows (tree)

(3) Intermittent shadows (clouds)

(4) Fixed shadows (soiling)(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Time

DC power measuring box and DC power analysis

DC Voltage Input max 1500V

DC Current Input max 30A

Necessity to develop a DC power faultdetection in function of types of shadows onPV modules

1

DS2e-0190

Shadow source Table 1 : List of PV equipment of ADREAM platform

Figure 1 : ADREAM platform, LAAS-CNRS, Toulouse, France

Figure 2 : Schematic bloc of test bench for DC power measurement with measuring box Figure 3 : Analysis of the power behavior for each case of shadows

Table 2 : Maximum input specifications of the DC measuring box

Page 2: A new method for fault detection and identification of ... poster 2015.pdf · Laboratoire conventionné avec l’Université de Toulouse A new method for fault detection and identification

Laboratoire

conventionné avec

l’Université de Toulouse

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00-1

0

1

Time (h)F

ixed

shadow

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

10

20

14:00

30

DC

pow

er

sim

ula

tion

(W)

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

0.5

1

Fault

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

0.5

1

Inte

rmitte

nt

shadow

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

0.5

1

Variable

shadow

1 CNRS; LAAS; 7 Avenue du Colonel Roche, F-31077, TOULOUSE, FRANCE.2 UNIVERSITE DE TOULOUSE; UPS, INSA; LAAS; F-31400, TOULOUSE, FRANCE.

E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

Fault detection algorithm

Experimental results

Module TE2200 Mono crystalline Pmpp VOC Isc Vmpp Impp

Value 250Wp 37.5V 8.8A 30.05V 8.4A

2

0P Pd P

P

Variable initialization

Fault == 0 or P > P0 x 0.9

P > 0

P0 = P P0 = P01

t = 0

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

no

no

no

no

no

no

no

no

0 1P Pd P

P

Start

P > P0 x 0.9

P=PMPP

P01 = P

dP< -0.1 and P > 5

Fault == 1

Fault = 1Fault = 0

t = 0 t = t + 1

10 min < t > 60 min

Variable = 1Variable = 0

0 < t > 10 min

c > 60 min

Intermittent = 0 Intermittent = 1

Fixed= 1 Fixed= 0

Step (2)

Step (3)

Step (1)

Simulation results

(a) DC power simulation on one day with two kinds of fault

(b) Fault detection without identifying its nature

(c) Identification by default that the shadow is intermittentand supposed to be present during a short time

(d) Identification of a variable shadow if the duration of thefailure is longer than 10 minutes

(e) Identification of a fixed shadow if the duration of thefailure is longer than 60 minutes

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

4080

120160200

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

0.5

1

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

0.5

1

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

0.5

1

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00-1

0

1

Fix

ed

shadow

DC

pow

er

(W)

Fault

Inte

rmitte

nt

shadow

Variable

shadow

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

4080

120160200

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

0.5

1

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

0.5

1

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

0.5

1

08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:000

0.5

1

Fix

ed

shadow

DC

pow

er

(W)

Fault

Inte

rmitte

nt

shadow

Variable

shadow

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 4 : Flowchart for fault detection and identification of shadows

Figure 5 : Drop DC power analysis in simulation and fault detection

Figure 7 : Drop DC power output measurements and fault detection analysis for very cloudy weather (October 2014)

Figure 6 : DC power output measurements and fault detection analysis for a clean sky (October 2014)

Table 3 : TE2200 PV module specifications (TENESOL)

ConclusionPhotovoltaic facilities are most affected by shadows such as antennas, chimneys, trees, soiling, etc, especially in urban areas. Amethod of detecting, locating and identifying several types of shadows is given by DC power output analysis which allowsaccurately and timely maintenance of solar field. This method could inform PV users or PV manufacturers of the robustness of PVmodules against presence of shadows despite the protection of diodes included in the PV modules.

A new method for fault detection and identification

of shadows based on electrical signature of defectsM. BRESSAN1, Y. EL-BASRI1, C. ALONSO1,2


Recommended