Date post: | 29-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | morgan-jones |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
A Program of Research Examining the Cognitive Correlates of Methamphetamine Abuse.
Cognitive Battery
• Broad in Scope
• Probes Simple Effects
– or
• Uses Instruments Known to Tap Specific Effects
__________________________
• Several Studies
• N’s will be reported
• Comparison Groups do not differ in:
– Age
– Gender
– Education
– Ethnicity
Memory Tests
• Word Recall
• Picture Recall
• Word Recognition
• Picture Recognition
• Backward Digit Span
Perceptual Speed and Manipulation of Information
• Digit Symbol
• Trail Making A
• Trail Making B
Other Instruments• Ability to Ignore Irrelevant Information
• Stroop
• Short Form IQ • Shipley-Hartford Vocabulary • Shipley-Hartford Abstract Thinking
• Verbal Fluency • FAS
• Abstract Reasoning • WCST
First Question
Are there cognitive deficits in individuals currently abusing methamphetamine?
Perceptual Speed and Manipulation of Information
N= 65 per group
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Digit Symbol Trails A Trails B
MAComparison
*
*
Ability to Ignore Irrelevant Information - Stroop Test
N = 65 per group
0
1020
3040
5060
7080
90100
Words Colors Color-Words
MAComparison
*
Memory TestsN = 65 per group
0
5
10
15
20
25
Word
Rec
all
Pic
ture
Rec
all
Word
Rec
ogn
itio
n
Pic
ture
Rec
ogn
itio
n
MA
Comparison
* *
Short Form IQN= 65 per group
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Vocabulary Abstract Thinking
MAComparison
*
Other Measures
• Verbal Fluency
• FAS NS
• Working Memory for Digits
• Backward Span NS
• Abstract Thinking
• WCST NS
Second Question
Are the deficits found in current methamphetamine abusers associated with the amount, pattern, frequency or length of use?
Associations with Cognitive Deficits
N = 90 MA Abusers
• No Association was found for• Length of Use• Age• Family History• Medical History• Gender• Route of Administration
Association with Cognitive Deficits
N = 90 MA Abusers
• Frequency of Use Predicts:
– Recall p=.02
– Recognition p=.02
– Word p=.01
– Picture p=.02
– Stroop Interference p<.01
– Digit Symbol p=.02
Third Question
Are the same deficits found for current abuse of other stimulants such as cocaine?
Comparison of Cognitive Performance of Current Abusers of
MA and Cocaine• N = 160
• Four groups of 40
• MA
• MA comparison
• Cocaine
• Cocaine comparison
MA vs. CocaineMeasure MA Comp Coc. Comp
Vocabulary 26.6 30* 24.7 28*
Abstract Thinking 11.5 16** 10.6 13.6*
Digit Symbol 53 66** 51 56
Trails A 32 27** 36 31
Trails B 81 62** 87 70
Stroop CW 39 46** 36.6 40.3*
Word Recall 3.1 6.2* 2.5 4.2**
Picture Recall 5.5 6.7 5.0 6.7**
Difference on Word Recognition for groups with Wender Scores >46
& <46
Mean Word Recognition
WURS>46 12.7
WURS<46 15.2 (t80=2.04, p=.04)
Effect of Childhood ADHD as Measured by the Wender Utah
Rating Scale• WURS Score does not predict cognitive
performance.
• WURS Score >46 = Probable ADHD
• 83 Currently Using MA Abusers were divided into two groups: >46 (N=25) and > 46 (N=58).
Differences on WCST between Probable ADHD and Comparison
Groups>46 Comparison
Categories 4.76 5.67 *
Total Errors 28.4 17.9 *
Perseverative 14.4 9.11 *
Nonperseverative 14.0 8.81 *
% Conceptual Level 67.0 77.6 *
Failure to Maintain Set 1.04 0.47 *
<46 vs. Comparison NS on all Measures
Fourth Question
What is the duration of the deficits after use stops?
Memory 0 - 3 Months
0
5
10
15
20
25
Word Recall PictureRecall
WordRecognition
PictureRecognition
Comparison
1-7 days
3 Months
N=22
Ability to Ignore Irrelevant Information 0 - 6+ Months
41
4243
4445
4647
4849
5051
Color-Words
ComparisonPositive3 Months6 Months6+ Months
Cross Sectional Data
Manipulation of Information and Perceptual Speed 0 - 6
Months
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Digit Symbol Trails Trails B
Comparison1 - 7 days3 Months6 Months
N = 7
Memory 0 - 6 Months
0
5
10
15
20
25
Word Recall PictureRecall
WordRecognition
PictureRecognition
Comparison1-7 days3 Months6 months
N=7
Manipulation of Information and Perceptual Speed 0 - 6+
Months
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Digit Symbol Trails Trails B
Comparison1 - 7 days3 Months6 Months6+ Months
Cross Sectional Data
Manipulation of Information and Perceptual Speed
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Digit Symbol Trails A Trails B
Comparison1-7 Days3 Months
N = 22
Memory 0 - 6 Months Cross Sectional Data
0
5
10
15
20
25
Word Recall PictureRecall
WordRecognition
PictureRecognition
ComparisonPositive3 Months6 Months6+ Months
Work Planned and in Progress:Further Questions
Questions about Memory
• Is the problem for abusers task difficulty or verbal material?
• Does the problem exist for Semantic as well as Episodic Memory?
• Is Implicit Memory Effected?
• Is Working Memory Effected?
Questions about Memory Continued
• What memory process(s) are affected? – Encoding– Rehearsal– Retrieval
Does the problem exist for Semantic as well as Episodic Memory?
• No
• We found no difference between MA abusers and the comparison group on Shipley-Hartford Vocabulary and FAS. Both of these are tests of Semantic Memory.
Is Implicit Memory Effected?
Preliminary analyses suggest that Implicit Memory is not affected in MA abusers.
MA Comparison
Word Fragment Words 3.8 4.3
Total Words 7.6 10.2
N (MA=17, Comparison=14)
Is Working Memory Effected?
Results from our tests of working memory
are not consistent.
MA Comparison
Missing Digit 7.52 6.92
Sentence Span 1.9 2.4*
N (MA=17, Comparison=14)
Questions About Attention
• How pervasive are problems with attention?
• If attention is a problem, how long does the problem last?
• Do deficits in attention account for some of the problems with memory?
Questions about Executive Function
• Are there deficits found on tasks that are associated with a specific area of the prefrontal cortex?
• Is the score on the measure of childhood ADHD associated with performance on tasks tapping executive function?
Word Recognition
0
5
10
15
20
25
1-7 days 3 months 6 months
1234567
0123456789
10
1-7 days 3 months 6 months
1234567
Word Recall