+ All Categories
Home > Documents > A Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring Network for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of...

A Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring Network for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of...

Date post: 18-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: wendy-berry
View: 223 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
29
A Real-Time Water Quality A Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring Network for Monitoring Network for Investigating the Strengths and Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Monitoring Techniques David K. Stevens David K. Stevens 1 , Jeffery S. Horsburgh , Jeffery S. Horsburgh 1 , , Nancy Mesner Nancy Mesner 2 Amber Spackman Amber Spackman 1 1 Utah Water Research Laboratory Utah Water Research Laboratory 2 Dept. of Aquatic, Watershed, and Earth Dept. of Aquatic, Watershed, and Earth Resources Resources Utah State University, Logan, UT Utah State University, Logan, UT
Transcript

A Real-Time Water Quality A Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring Network for Monitoring Network for

Investigating the Strengths and Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring TechniquesMonitoring Techniques

David K. StevensDavid K. Stevens11, Jeffery S. Horsburgh, Jeffery S. Horsburgh11, Nancy , Nancy MesnerMesner22

Amber SpackmanAmber Spackman11

11Utah Water Research LaboratoryUtah Water Research Laboratory22Dept. of Aquatic, Watershed, and Earth ResourcesDept. of Aquatic, Watershed, and Earth Resources

Utah State University, Logan, UTUtah State University, Logan, UT

The Interesting QuestionsThe Interesting Questions

► Is Is traditionaltraditional monitoring adequate to monitoring adequate to characterize natural or characterize natural or anthropogenic variability in flow and anthropogenic variability in flow and total phosphorus concentrations?total phosphorus concentrations?

►Do in stream monitoring data used in Do in stream monitoring data used in typical TMDLs focus too much on typical TMDLs focus too much on point source loads when intermittent point source loads when intermittent or infrequent nonpoint source loads or infrequent nonpoint source loads may be important?may be important?

Current projectCurrent project

► Continuous water quality monitoring effort Continuous water quality monitoring effort in the Little Bear River of Northern Utahin the Little Bear River of Northern Utah

continuous flow/water quality paired with continuous flow/water quality paired with periodic and storm event samplingperiodic and storm event sampling

designed to evaluate the strengths and designed to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each of the water quality weaknesses of each of the water quality monitoring techniquesmonitoring techniques

focus on correlating the results of high frequency focus on correlating the results of high frequency turbidity, oxygen, temperature, conductance and turbidity, oxygen, temperature, conductance and pH (possible others) monitoring with those of pH (possible others) monitoring with those of traditional samplingtraditional sampling

Little Bear River Watershed

near Logan (Cache County, Utah

Project LandscapeProject Landscape

Typical dataTypical data

100

1000

Jan 98 Apr Jul Oct Jan 99

Str

eam

flow

, cfs

Date

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.60

Jan 98 Apr Jul Oct Jan 99

Pho

spho

rus

Tota

l; m

g/L

as P

Date

Stream flow Total phosphorus

Analysis of Monitoring Analysis of Monitoring TechniquesTechniques

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

8/14/2005 8/15/2005 8/16/2005 8/17/2005 8/18/2005 8/19/2005 8/20/2005

Date

Tu

rbid

ity

(N

TU

)

1.4

1.453

1.506

1.559

1.612

1.665

1.718

1.771

1.824

1.877

1.93

1.983

2.036

2.089

2.142

2.195

Wa

ter

Le

ve

l (f

t)

Median Turbidity Water Level0.00

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

1.25

1.50

1.75

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

4905000 - LITTLE BEAR R @ CR376 XING (MENDON RD)

Pho

spho

rus

as P

, tot

al (m

g/L)

Date

Surrogate measuresSurrogate measures

► Turbidity as a surrogate measure for total Turbidity as a surrogate measure for total suspended solids (TSS) suspended solids (TSS) relationships can be established between turbidity relationships can be established between turbidity

(continuously), and periodic grab samples for TSS(continuously), and periodic grab samples for TSS relationships are site/time specific relationships are site/time specific

► Hypothesis: Nutrients, microbial Hypothesis: Nutrients, microbial contaminants, and organic matter can also be contaminants, and organic matter can also be correlated with turbidity, along with other correlated with turbidity, along with other water quality and station/time-specific water quality and station/time-specific measures to help assess loadingsmeasures to help assess loadings

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

fiel

d, u

mho

s/cm

@ 2

5C

Residue Total Filtrable, Dried At 105C mg/L

Slope = 1.46

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

fiel

d, u

mho

s/cm

@ 2

5C

Residue Total Filtrable, Dried At 105C mg/L

Slope = 1.57

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

125 150 175 200 225 250

Spe

cific

Con

duct

ance

fiel

d, u

mho

s/cm

@ 2

5CResidue Total Filtrable, Dried At 105C mg/L

Slope = 1.73

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225Tu

rbid

ity la

b, N

ephe

lom

etric

Tur

bidi

ty U

nits

Ntu

Residue Total Nonfiltrable, mg/L

Slope = 0.41

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

Turb

idity

lab,

Nep

helo

met

ric T

urbi

dity

Uni

ts N

tu

Residue Total Nonfiltrable, mg/L

Slope = 0.31

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55

Turb

idity

lab,

Nep

helo

met

ric T

urbi

dity

Uni

ts N

tu

Residue Total Nonfiltrable, mg/L

Slope = 0.20

Turbidity vs. Total suspended solids

Specific conductance vs. Total dissolved solids

River main stem Tributary Reservoir release

LocationLocation

Correlation coefficientCorrelation coefficient

LocationLocation

Correlation coefficientCorrelation coefficient

TOC vs. TOC vs. UVUV254254

Turbidity vs. Turbidity vs. TSSTSS

Conductance Conductance vs. TDSvs. TDS

TOC vs. TOC vs. UVUV254254

Turbidity vs. Turbidity vs. TSSTSS

Conductance Conductance vs. TDSvs. TDS

Weber above Weber above WanshipWanship 0.9860.986 0.9450.945 0.8390.839 Lost Cr @ Cement Lost Cr @ Cement

PlantPlant 0.8250.825 0.8670.867 0.9380.938

Weber below Weber below WanshipWanship 0.5760.576 0.6930.693 0.8830.883 Lost Creek below Lost Creek below

SpringsSprings 0.8590.859 0.9210.921 0.7010.701

Silver CreekSilver Creek 0.7080.708 0.9200.920 0.9090.909 Weber below Lost Weber below Lost CreekCreek 0.8440.844 0.4070.407 --

Weber above EchoWeber above Echo 0.6140.614 0.5640.564 0.7260.726 East Canyon above East Canyon above ReservoirReservoir 0.8640.864 0.4480.448 0.8240.824

Chalk CreekChalk Creek 0.8960.896 0.9290.929 0.7530.753 East Canyon below East Canyon below ReservoirReservoir 0.8820.882 0.7250.725 0.2310.231

Weber below EchoWeber below Echo 0.7260.726 0.4160.416 0.7830.783 Weber @ MorganWeber @ Morgan 0.8810.881 0.8050.805 0.8760.876

Echo CreekEcho Creek 0.8650.865 0.7580.758 0.9450.945 East Canyon @ East Canyon @ WeberWeber 0.8190.819 0.9470.947 0.8850.885

Weber @ HeneferWeber @ Henefer 0.5610.561 0.6840.684 0.9540.954 Weber @ StoddardWeber @ Stoddard 0.8930.893 0.9400.940 ----

LocationLocation

Correlation coefficientCorrelation coefficient

LocationLocation

Correlation coefficientCorrelation coefficient

TOC vs. TOC vs. UVUV254254

Turbidity vs. Turbidity vs. TSSTSS

Conductance Conductance vs. TDSvs. TDS

TOC vs. TOC vs. UVUV254254

Turbidity vs. Turbidity vs. TSSTSS

Conductance Conductance vs. TDSvs. TDS

Weber above Weber above WanshipWanship 0.9860.986 0.9450.945 0.8390.839 Lost Cr @ Cement Lost Cr @ Cement

PlantPlant 0.8250.825 0.8670.867 0.9380.938

Weber below Weber below WanshipWanship 0.5760.576 0.6930.693 0.8830.883 Lost Creek below Lost Creek below

SpringsSprings 0.8590.859 0.9210.921 0.7010.701

Silver CreekSilver Creek 0.7080.708 0.9200.920 0.9090.909 Weber below Lost Weber below Lost CreekCreek 0.8440.844 0.4070.407 --

Weber above EchoWeber above Echo 0.6140.614 0.5640.564 0.7260.726 East Canyon above East Canyon above ReservoirReservoir 0.8640.864 0.4480.448 0.8240.824

Chalk CreekChalk Creek 0.8960.896 0.9290.929 0.7530.753 East Canyon below East Canyon below ReservoirReservoir 0.8820.882 0.7250.725 0.2310.231

Weber below EchoWeber below Echo 0.7260.726 0.4160.416 0.7830.783 Weber @ MorganWeber @ Morgan 0.8810.881 0.8050.805 0.8760.876

Echo CreekEcho Creek 0.8650.865 0.7580.758 0.9450.945 East Canyon @ East Canyon @ WeberWeber 0.8190.819 0.9470.947 0.8850.885

Weber @ HeneferWeber @ Henefer 0.5610.561 0.6840.684 0.9540.954 Weber @ StoddardWeber @ Stoddard 0.8930.893 0.9400.940 ----

LocationLocation

Correlation coefficientCorrelation coefficient

LocationLocation

Correlation coefficientCorrelation coefficient

TOC vs. TOC vs. UVUV254254

Turbidity vs. Turbidity vs. TSSTSS

Conductance Conductance vs. TDSvs. TDS

TOC vs. TOC vs. UVUV254254

Turbidity vs. Turbidity vs. TSSTSS

Conductance Conductance vs. TDSvs. TDS

Weber above Weber above WanshipWanship 0.9860.986 0.9450.945 0.8390.839 Lost Cr @ Cement Lost Cr @ Cement

PlantPlant 0.8250.825 0.8670.867 0.9380.938

Weber below Weber below WanshipWanship 0.5760.576 0.6930.693 0.8830.883 Lost Creek below Lost Creek below

SpringsSprings 0.8590.859 0.9210.921 0.7010.701

Silver CreekSilver Creek 0.7080.708 0.9200.920 0.9090.909 Weber below Lost Weber below Lost CreekCreek 0.8440.844 0.4070.407 --

Weber above EchoWeber above Echo 0.6140.614 0.5640.564 0.7260.726 East Canyon above East Canyon above ReservoirReservoir 0.8640.864 0.4480.448 0.8240.824

Chalk CreekChalk Creek 0.8960.896 0.9290.929 0.7530.753 East Canyon below East Canyon below ReservoirReservoir 0.8820.882 0.7250.725 0.2310.231

Weber below EchoWeber below Echo 0.7260.726 0.4160.416 0.7830.783 Weber @ MorganWeber @ Morgan 0.8810.881 0.8050.805 0.8760.876

Echo CreekEcho Creek 0.8650.865 0.7580.758 0.9450.945 East Canyon @ East Canyon @ WeberWeber 0.8190.819 0.9470.947 0.8850.885

Weber @ HeneferWeber @ Henefer 0.5610.561 0.6840.684 0.9540.954 Weber @ StoddardWeber @ Stoddard 0.8930.893 0.9400.940 ----

Bayesian networksBayesian networks

►Probabilistic network models Probabilistic network models graphical representationgraphical representation relationships among variablesrelationships among variables

► exogenous,exogenous,► state, and state, and ►systemsystem

►Directed acyclic graph Directed acyclic graph causal structure of variablescausal structure of variables conditional probability distributions conditional probability distributions

C

B A

Little Bear River Sampling Little Bear River Sampling ProgramProgram

Continuous Monitoring Continuous Monitoring EquipmentEquipment► Stage recording Stage recording

devices to devices to estimate estimate dischargedischarge

► Turbidity Turbidity sensors to sensors to monitor water monitor water qualityquality

► Dataloggers and Dataloggers and telemetry telemetry equipmentequipment

http://www.campbellsci.com

http://www.ftsinc.com/

http://www.campbellsci.com

Flow/water quality monitoring Flow/water quality monitoring infrastructureinfrastructure

Continuous Monitoring DataContinuous Monitoring DataLittle Bear River Near ParadiseLittle Bear River Near Paradise

Little Bear River Near Paradise

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

3/1/

2006

3/3/

2006

3/5/

2006

3/7/

2006

3/9/

2006

3/11

/200

6

3/13

/200

6

3/15

/200

6

3/17

/200

6

3/19

/200

6

3/21

/200

6

Date

Streamflow (cfs) Turbidity (NTU)

StormEvent

Monitoring infrastructure …Monitoring infrastructure …

CentralObservations

Database

Wet Chemistry Measurements

Sensors(Streamflow

Water QualityClimate)

Constituent Bayes Net

Exogenous Variables

(GIS, Land Use,Management)

C

BA

Sensor BayesNetwork

Telemetry Network

Nutrient Estimates

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

1980 1990 2000

Res

idue

Tot

al N

onfil

trab

le;

mg/

L

Date

C

BA

Little Bear River Sampling Little Bear River Sampling ProgramProgram

Periodic Baseline SamplingPeriodic Baseline Sampling► Continuous flow, temp., D.O., pH, Spec. cond., Continuous flow, temp., D.O., pH, Spec. cond.,

turbidityturbidity

► Field samples collected weekly or bi-weekly Field samples collected weekly or bi-weekly depending on the time of year and analyzed for:depending on the time of year and analyzed for: Nutrients Nutrients Total suspended solidsTotal suspended solids Total dissolved solidsTotal dissolved solids

► Simultaneous spot checks of turbidity with a Simultaneous spot checks of turbidity with a portable field meterportable field meter

► Establish relationships between total phosphorus, Establish relationships between total phosphorus, total suspended, dissolved solids, turbidity, flow, total suspended, dissolved solids, turbidity, flow, time, watershed characteristics, otherstime, watershed characteristics, others

… … Starting this fallStarting this fall

► MonitoringMonitoring Add four continuous climate stationsAdd four continuous climate stations Add six new continuous water quality monitoring Add six new continuous water quality monitoring

stationsstations

► AnalysisAnalysis Construct time series of estimates for constituentsConstruct time series of estimates for constituents Study the high frequency patterns of estimated Study the high frequency patterns of estimated

nutrient loadingnutrient loading

► Cyberinfrastructure improvement (session Cyberinfrastructure improvement (session K1-2, tomorrow afternoon)K1-2, tomorrow afternoon)

What do we gain?What do we gain?

► Greatly reduced uncertainty in flows and Greatly reduced uncertainty in flows and concentrations at a reasonable costconcentrations at a reasonable cost

Use large quantities of relatively low cost (read: Use large quantities of relatively low cost (read: less precise) data rather than small(er) quantities less precise) data rather than small(er) quantities of expensive (more precise) dataof expensive (more precise) data

► Potential characterization of pollutant Potential characterization of pollutant loading down to an hourly scale with loading down to an hourly scale with uncertainty estimates via Bayes networks?uncertainty estimates via Bayes networks?

Do in-stream monitoring data used in TMDLs Do in-stream monitoring data used in TMDLs focus too much on relatively steady point focus too much on relatively steady point source loads when intermittent or infrequent source loads when intermittent or infrequent nonpoint source loads are important?nonpoint source loads are important?

► Is it worth while for a POTW to install monitoring Is it worth while for a POTW to install monitoring equipment downstream of a discharge to better equipment downstream of a discharge to better characterize the full spectrum of loading in the characterize the full spectrum of loading in the stream? – as opposed to stream? – as opposed to

► Traditional ambient monitoring that may only Traditional ambient monitoring that may only characterize the times when characterize the times when loadingloading in the in the stream is dominated by WWTP discharges, e.g. stream is dominated by WWTP discharges, e.g. East Canyon Creek, Park City, UT - Up to 50 % of East Canyon Creek, Park City, UT - Up to 50 % of the flow at times is WWTP discharge, but 50% of the flow at times is WWTP discharge, but 50% of annualannual total phosphorus load may occur during total phosphorus load may occur during one storm eventone storm event

Where are we headed?Where are we headed?

► Rigorously explore the relationships between Rigorously explore the relationships between the surrogates and the parameters of interestthe surrogates and the parameters of interest

► Explore spatial/temporal influences on these Explore spatial/temporal influences on these relationshipsrelationships

► Analyze the significance of storm event loads Analyze the significance of storm event loads vs. base flow loadsvs. base flow loads

► Back next NWQMCBack next NWQMC

ConclusionsConclusions

►Status of monitoring networkStatus of monitoring network

First two stations established August ’05First two stations established August ’05 Field sampling initiated March ’06 – data Field sampling initiated March ’06 – data

just now becoming availablejust now becoming available Reliability high with ‘graduate student’ Reliability high with ‘graduate student’

maintenancemaintenance

ConclusionsConclusions

► FutureFuture Dramatically increase amount of dataDramatically increase amount of data

► flow, continuous, field water qualityflow, continuous, field water quality► climate (four new stations)climate (four new stations)

ExternalitiesExternalities► update/improve resolution of land use/land coverupdate/improve resolution of land use/land cover► update irrigation practice information (diversions, update irrigation practice information (diversions,

return flow, etc.) return flow, etc.) ► complete data acquisition for nutrient management complete data acquisition for nutrient management

pactices/BMPpactices/BMP Long termLong term

► help provide information for development of help provide information for development of hydrologic/environmental observatories with NSF/EPA hydrologic/environmental observatories with NSF/EPA supportsupport

AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements

►USDA/CEAPUSDA/CEAP►State of Utah, Division of Water QualityState of Utah, Division of Water Quality►Natural Resources Conservation ServiceNatural Resources Conservation Service►USU Water InitiativeUSU Water Initiative►Utah Water Research LaboratoryUtah Water Research Laboratory►National Science Foundation National Science Foundation

(hydrologic/environmental observatories)(hydrologic/environmental observatories)

AbstractAbstract

► Traditional water quality monitoring approachesTraditional water quality monitoring approaches grab and/or composite samplesgrab and/or composite samples supporting in-stream measurements of temperature, supporting in-stream measurements of temperature,

dissolved oxygen, pH, and specific conductancedissolved oxygen, pH, and specific conductance monthly, bi-weekly, or even weekly frequencymonthly, bi-weekly, or even weekly frequency inadequate to the variability in pollutant concentrationsinadequate to the variability in pollutant concentrations underestimation of pollutant loads and a greater focus underestimation of pollutant loads and a greater focus

on steady point source loading when intermittent or on steady point source loading when intermittent or infrequent nonpoint source loads are important but not infrequent nonpoint source loads are important but not characterized by grab samples.characterized by grab samples.

Objective 1Objective 1

► Construct time series of estimates for Construct time series of estimates for constituentsconstituents

Bayesian Network models Bayesian Network models ► real time estimation of constituent fluxes and real time estimation of constituent fluxes and

concentrations conditional upon surrogate concentrations conditional upon surrogate measurements.measurements.

Uncertainty associated with Bayesian Uncertainty associated with Bayesian estimates of constituent concentration and estimates of constituent concentration and loadingloading

► can be used to optimize the collection field can be used to optimize the collection field samplessamples

Objective 2Objective 2

► Study the high frequency patterns of Study the high frequency patterns of estimated nutrient loadingestimated nutrient loading

High frequency information more effective for High frequency information more effective for quantifying the relationships between quantifying the relationships between constituent concentrations and watershed constituent concentrations and watershed attributes and management practices attributes and management practices

Significant nutrient fluxes are associated with Significant nutrient fluxes are associated with episodic events that can only be quantified episodic events that can only be quantified through high frequency sampling.through high frequency sampling.

Nutrient loading estimates to quantify the Nutrient loading estimates to quantify the probability distributions to Bayesian Network probability distributions to Bayesian Network models - smaller uncertaintymodels - smaller uncertainty

Objective 3Objective 3

► CyberinfrastructureCyberinfrastructure Seamless, two-way linkages between sensors Seamless, two-way linkages between sensors

andand► a central observations database that stores and a central observations database that stores and

archives the observations;archives the observations;► models or data analysis software that use the data;models or data analysis software that use the data;► connected via a telemetry system;connected via a telemetry system;► interfaced with a central hydrologic observations interfaced with a central hydrologic observations

database via data filters and QA/QC.database via data filters and QA/QC. Data are immediately available for analysis, Data are immediately available for analysis,

modeling, and decision making.modeling, and decision making. Bayesian Network outputs to trigger the Bayesian Network outputs to trigger the

collection of field samples to estimate loadscollection of field samples to estimate loads

Observations infrastructureObservations infrastructure

► Currently monitoringCurrently monitoring stream flow and turbidity at high frequency at two stream flow and turbidity at high frequency at two

sites relayed via radio frequency transmission to a sites relayed via radio frequency transmission to a base station at the Utah Water Research Laboratory. base station at the Utah Water Research Laboratory.

routine and episodic grab sampling at these two sitesroutine and episodic grab sampling at these two sites

► This fallThis fall instrument six additional sites, each of which is an instrument six additional sites, each of which is an

historic USGS stream flow gauging locationhistoric USGS stream flow gauging location continuously monitor stream flow, turbidity, dissolved continuously monitor stream flow, turbidity, dissolved

oxygen, specific conductance, and water temperatureoxygen, specific conductance, and water temperature expand field/automatic sampling efforts to new sitesexpand field/automatic sampling efforts to new sites

Little Bear River Sampling Little Bear River Sampling Program Program

Storm Event SamplingStorm Event Sampling►Automated sampling of storm eventsAutomated sampling of storm events►Triggered by precipitationTriggered by precipitation►Characterize the system responseCharacterize the system response►Rise and fall of storm hydrographRise and fall of storm hydrograph


Recommended