Date post: | 10-Feb-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | tesfahun-girma |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 1 times |
of 46
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
1/46
A review on Load flowstudies
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
2/46
Outline
Introduction Methodology Classical methodsGauss-Seidal methodNewton Raphson methodFast Decoupled method Other methods
Fuzzy Logic application Genetic Algorithm application Particle swarm method (PS0)
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
3/46
Load/Power Flow studies Load-flow studies are performed to determine the steady-state
operation of an electric power system. It calculates the voltagedrop on each feeder, the voltage at each bus, and the powerflow in all branch and feeder circuits.
Determine if system voltages remain within specified limitsunder various contingency conditions, and whether equipment
such as transformers and conductors are overloaded. Load-flow studies are often used to identify the need for
additional generation, capacitive, or inductive VAR support, orthe placement of capacitors and/or reactors to maintain systemvoltages within specified limits.
Losses in each branch and total system power losses are also
calculated. Necessary for planning, economic scheduling, and control of an
existing system as well as planning its future expansion
Pulse of the system
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
4/46
Power Flow Equation
Note: Transmission lines arerepresented by their equivalent pi
models (impedance in p.u.)
Applying KCL to this bus results
in
(1)
Fig. 1. A typical bus of the power system.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
5/46
(2)
The real and reactive power at bus
iis
Substituting for Ii in (2) yields
Equation (5) is an algebraic non linear equation which must be solved by
iterative techniques
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
6/46
Gauss-Seidel method
Equation (5) is solved for Visolved iteratively
Where yi jis the actual admittance in p.u.
Pischand Qi
schare the net real and reactive powers in p.u.
In writing the KCL, current entering bus Iwas assumed positive. Thus
for:Generator buses (where real and reactive powers are injected), Pi
schand
Qisch have positive values.
Load buses (real and reactive powers flow away from the bus), Pischand
Qisch have negative values.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
7/46
Eqn.5 can be solved forPiand Qi
The power flow equation is usually expressed in terms of the
elements of the bus admittance matrix, Ybus ,shown by upper case
letters, are Yij = -yij, and the diagonal elements are Yii = yij.
Hence eqn. 6 can be written as
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
8/46
Iterative steps:
Slack bus: both components of the voltage are specified. 2(n-1)
equations to be solved iteratively.
Flat voltage start: initial voltage of 1.0+j0 for unknown voltages.
PQ buses: Pisch and Qisch are known. with flat voltage start, Eqn. 9 issolved for real and imaginary components of Voltage.
PV buses: Pisch and [Vi] are known. Eqn. 11 is solved for Qi
k+1which is
then substituted in Eqn. 9 to solve for Vik+1
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
9/46
However, since [Vi] is specified, only the imaginary part of Vik+1 is
retained, and its real part is selected in order to satisfy
acceleration factor:the rate of convergence is increased by applying anacceleration factor to the approx. solution obtained from each iteration.
Iteration is continued until
Once a solution is converged, the net real and reactive powers at the slack
bus are computed from Eqns.10 & 11.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
10/46
Line flows and Line losses
Considering Ii jpositive in the given direction,
Similarly, considering the line current Ijiin the given direction,
The complex power Si jfrom bus i to j and Sji from bus j to i are
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
11/46
Newton Raphson Method
Power flow equations formulated in polar form. For the
system in Fig.1, Eqn.2 can be written in terms of busadmittance matrix as
Expressing in polar form;
Note:jalso includes i
Substituting for Iifrom Eqn.21 in Eqn. 4
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
12/46
Separating the real and imaginary parts,
Expanding Eqns. 23 & 24 in Taylor's series about the initial estimateneglecting h.o.t. we get
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
13/46
The Jacobian matrix gives the linearized relationship between small changes ini
(k ) and voltage magnitude [Vik] with the small changes in real and reactive
power Pi(k) and Qi
(k)
The diagonal and the off-diagonal elements of J1are:
Similarly we can find the diagonal and off-diagonal elements of J2,J3and J4
The terms Pi(k) and Qi
(k )are the difference between the scheduled
and calculated values, known as the power residuals.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
14/46
Procedures:
1. For Load buses (P,Q specified), flat voltage start. For voltage controlledbuses (P,V specified),set equal to 0.
2. For Load buses,Pi(k) and Qi(k )are calculated from Eqns.23 & 24 andPi
(k) and Qi(k )are calculated from Eqns. 29 & 30.
3. For voltage controlled buses, and Pi(k) and Pi
(k )are calculated from
Eqns. 23 & 29 respectively.
4. The elements of the Jacobian matrix are calculated.
5. The linear simultaneous equation 26 is solved directly by optimally
ordered triangle factorization and Gaussian elimination.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
15/46
6. The new voltage magnitudes and phase angles are computed from (31)
and (32).7. The process is continued until the residuals Pi
(k) and Qi(k ) are less
than the specified accuracy i.e.
3. Fast Decoupled Method
practical power transmission lines have high X/R ratio.Real power changes are less sensitive to voltage magnitude changes andare most sensitive to changes in phase angle .
Similarly, reactive power changes are less sensitive to changes in angle
and are mainly dependent on changes in voltage magnitude.
Therefore the Jacobian matrix in Eqn.26 can be written as
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
16/46
The diagonal elements of J1 given by Eqn.27 is written as
Replacing the first term of the (37) withQi from (28)
Bi i = sum of susceptances of all the elements incident to bus i.
In a typical power system, Bi i Qi therefore we may neglect Qi
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
17/46
Furthermore, [Vi]2 [Vi] . Ultimately
In equation (28) assuming ii-i+j ii, the off diagonal elements of J1
becomes
Assuming [Vj] 1 we get
Similarly we can simplify the diagonal and off-diagonal elements of J4 as
With these assumptions, equations (35) & (36) can be written in
the following form
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
18/46
B and B are the imaginary part of the bus admittance
matrix Ybus. Since the elements of the matrix are constant,need to be triangularized and inverted only once at the
beginning of the iteration.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
19/46
Other Methods
Repetitive solution of a large set of linear equations
in LF- time consuming in simulations
Large number of calculations on the Jacobian
matrix.
Jacobian of load flow equation tends to be singular
under heavy loading.
Ill conditioned Jacobian matrix
Doesnt require the formation of the Jacobian matrix
Insensitive to the initial settings of the solutionvariables
Ability to find multiple load-flow solutions.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
20/46
Fuzzy Logic application Repetitive solution of a large set of linear equations in the load flow
problem is one of the most time consuming parts of power system
simulations.
Large number of calculations need on account of factorisation,
refactorization and computations of Jacobian matrix.
Fundamentally FL is implemented in a fast decoupled load flow(FDLF) problem.
Mathematical analysis of FDLF
In eqn. 1, the state vector is updated
but state vector V is fixed. Eqn. 2 isused to update the state vector Vwhile state vector is fixed. The
whole calculation will terminate only if
the errors of both these equations are
within acceptable tolerances
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
21/46
Main idea of FLF Algorithm
FLF algorithm is based on FDLF equation but the repeated update of the state
vector performed via Fuzzy Logic Control instead of using the classical load flow
approach.
The FLF algorithm is illustrated
schematically in Fig. 1.In this Figure
the power parameters FPand FQ
are calculatedand introduced to the
P- FLCP- and Q-V FLCQ-V,
respectively.
The FLCs generate the correction of
the state vector DX namely, the
correction of voltage angle for the
P- cycle and the correction ofvoltage magnitude V for the Q- V
cycle.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
22/46
Structure of the fuzzy load flow controller (FLFC)
Calculate and per-unite the power parameters FPand FQat each node
of the system.
The above parameters are elected as crisp input signals. The maximum (orworst) power parameter (FPmax or FQmax) determines the range of scale
mapping that transfers the input signals into corresponding universe ofdiscourse, at every iteration.The input signals are fuzzified into corresponding fuzzy signals (FPfuzor
FQfuzwith seven linguistic variables; largenegative (LN), medium negative
(MN), small negative(SN), zero (ZR), small positive (SP), medium positive
(MP), large positive (LP). They are represented in triangular function.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
23/46
The rule base involves seven rules tallying with seven linguistic
variables:Rule 1: if Ffuzis LN then Xfuzis LN
Rule 2: if Ffuzis MN then Xfuzis MN
Rule 3: if
Ffuzis SN thenXfuzis SNRule 4: if Ffuzis ZR then Xfuzis ZR
Rule 5: if Ffuzis SP then Xfuzis SP
Rule 6: if Ffuzis MP then Xfuzis MP
Rule 7: if Ffuzis LP then Xfuzis LP
These fuzzy rules are consistent to that of Eqn.3.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
24/46
The maximum corrective action xmaxof state variables determines
the range of scale mapping that transfers the output signals into the
corresponding universe of discourse at every iteration.
where FI expresses the real or reactive power balance
equation at node-I with maximum real or reactive power
mismatch of the system, XI represents the voltage angle or
magnitude at node-I.
The fuzzy signalsffuzare sent to process logic, which generatesthe fuzzy output signals xfuzbased on the previous rule base and
are represented by seven linguistic variables similar to input fuzzy
signals.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
25/46
finally the defuzzifier will transform fuzzy output signals into crisp
values for every node of the network. The state vector is updated
as
Index idepicts the number of iterations.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
26/46
Case studies
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
27/46
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
28/46
GA applicationsLoad flow problem
where Gij and Bijare the (I,j)th
element of the admittance
matrix. Ei, and Fi are real and
imaginary parts of the voltage at
node i.
If node i is a PQ node where the load demand is specified, then themismatches in active and reactive powers, Pi and Qi , respectively,
are given by
Pisp
and Qisp
are the specifiedactive and reactive powers at
node i.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
29/46
When node i is a PV node, the magnitude of the voltage, Vispand
the active power,Q;P, at i are specified. The mismatch in voltage
magnitude at node i can be defined as
The active power mismatch is as given
in Eqn.3
Objective function H is to be minimized.
Where Npq, Npvare the total numbers of PQ and PV
nodes.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
30/46
Components in genetic approach
1. Chromosomes: The real and imaginary parts of the
voltages of the nodes in the power system are
encoded using floating-point numbers and are set aselements in the chromosomes.
2. Fitness function:
3. Crossover operation: 2 point crossover method to
bring more diversity in the population of
chromosomes.4. Mutation operation: An element of a chromosome is
selected randomly. The voltage value of the element
is replaced by a value arbitrarily chosen within a
range of voltage values.
M is a constant for amplifying the fitness value.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
31/46
Initialize schromosomes in the population
Fitness f(x) of each chromosome (fittest
chromosomes always retained)
Replace the current population with new population
Mutation
Crossover (Pc= crossover
rate/probability)
Selection of chromosomes (roulette
wheel method)
No of
Offspring
=s? Maxnumber of
generation
reached?
End
Fig.1 GA Load flow
Algorithm flowchart
No
Yes
Yes No
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
32/46
Constraint satisfaction technique for updating candidate nodal
voltages
(a) Satisfying the powers at a PQ node i by updating a PQ node d.
(b) updating the voltage at a PV node to satisfy its voltage and activepower requirements
Constraint satisfaction for PQ nodes
Let the real and imaginary voltages of node d be Eidand Fid. The power
mismatches Pi in eqn. 3 and Q
i in eqn. 4 for node i are now set to zero.
From eqns. 1-4, when d i, Eidand Fid can be calculated according to
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
33/46
When d = i , the power constraints at PQ node d itself are required to be met.
The constraint equations for calculating Eidand Fid of node d can be derived
from eqns. 1- 4 by the same procedure above and by setting the subscript i
in eqns. 1-4 to d.
Constraint satisfaction for PV nodes
Let the real and imaginary voltages of the PV node d in the chromosome be
Eddand Fdd. The mismatches Pdin eqn. 3 and Vdin eqn. 5 for node d can
now be set to zero. From eqns. 1, 3, 5 and 6, the expressions for Eddand Fddare:
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
34/46
Methods for enhancing the CGALF Algorithm
a) Dynamic population technique
Diversity of the chromosomes increased by introducing new
chromosomes in the population to escape from local minimum points.
% of existing weaker chromosomes replaced by randomly generatedchromosomes when the values of objective function H are identical for a
specified number of generations or iterations- subject to constraint
satisfaction.
b) Solution acceleration technique
Faster convergence. Modify the constrained candidate solution process such that the revised
solutions in the chromosomes are closer to the candidate solution in the
best or fittest chromosome found so far.
Vk=2Vk,bestVk
c) Nodal voltage updating sequencei. Update the voltages of the PV nodes in the sequence of the node
number using eqns. 12-14.
ii. Then, the PQ node, which has the largest total mismatch, is updated
first using the constraint satisfaction methods.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
35/46
(iii) Repeat step (ii) until all the PQ nodes are processed.
In step (i) above, the update operation attempts to meet the
voltage magnitude constraints and active power requirements of
the PV nodes.The strategy employed in step (ii) guarantees a reduction of the
mismatch at the node with the largest total mismatch. The strategy
is applied dynamically during the processing of the nodes as
indicated in step (iii).
Application examples
Klos-kerner 11 node test system.
Two loading condition considered.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
36/46
Node 1: Slack node,voltage level=1.05pu. Nodes 5 and 9 are PV nodes
with target voltages of 1.05pu and 1.0375pu.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
37/46
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
38/46
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
39/46
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
40/46
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
41/46
Hybrid Particle swarm optimization
application
1. Problem Formulation: The load flow equations, at any given bus(i) inthe system, are as follows:
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
42/46
The optimization problem is formulated as follows:
2. Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization.
The PSO model consists of a number of particles moving around
in the search space, each representing a possible solution to a
numerical problem. Each particle has a position vector (xi)and avelocity vector (vi)), the position (pbesti) is the best position
encountered by the particle (i) during its search and the position
(gbest) is that of the best particle in the swarm group.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
43/46
In each iteration the velocity of each particle is updated according to its
best-encountered position and the best position encountered among
the group, using the following equation:
The position of each particle is then updated in each iteration by
adding the velocity vector to the position vector.
Inertia weight wcontrol the impact of the previous history of velocities
on the current velocity-it regulates the trade-off between the global and
local exploration abilities of the swarm.
Suitable value for w usually provide balance between global and local
exploration abilities and consequently a reduction on the number of
iterations for optimal solution.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
44/46
Ability of breeding, a powerful property of GA is used.
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
45/46
Numerical Examples
IEEE 14 bus system:
7/22/2019 A Review on Load Flow Studies Final
46/46
Thank youReferences:
1. Power System Analysis, Hadi saadat, McGraw Hill International editions.
2. Fuzzy Logic application in load flow studies,J.G.Vlachogiannis,IEE,2001.
3. Development of constrained-Genetic Algorithm load flow method,
K.P.Wong,A.Li,M.Y.Law,IEE,1997.4. Load flow solution using Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization, Amgad
A.El-Dib et.al, IEEE,2004.