+ All Categories
Home > Documents > A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University...

A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University...

Date post: 15-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: mireya-colbourne
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
30
A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River Schalliol, University of Chicago IV
Transcript
Page 1: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

A study in “dereliction” and placeJust north of the Calumet River

David Schalliol, University of Chicago IVSA 2004

Page 2: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

J & W: Definition

• “[A] place may be considered derelict to the extent that the symbols of disinvestment, vacancy, and degradation dominate. Where disrepair, litter, emptiness, violation, and other signs of diminished habitat prevail, a derelict zone exists in mind, if not reality.”

Page 3: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Summary: Four Main Points

• Theoretical:– “Derelict” places are more complex than treated in

the literature• Methodological

– Spatial constraints of development are important– History is important for understanding present– Suggests need for future research and

conceptualizations

Page 4: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Broken Window Theory: Social “Bad”

• James Q. Wilson and George Kelling– Broken windows, vacant lots, etc.

• Signal psychological disinvestment and, subsequently, uncontrolled environment

• Lead to fear, social atomization, crime

• Sampson and Roudenbush – Social disorder

Page 5: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Urban Succession: Functionally Deteriorated

• Subset of Chicago School, Social Ecology– W.I. Thomas Burgess

• Zone of Transition– “Zone of deterioration” with “slums,” “badlands,” “underworlds of

crime and vice.”– But also regeneration through gentrification and assimilation

– Hoyt• White elephants, artifacts of neighborhoods unable to

defend themselves– Large homes broken up into “kitchenettes,” etc

Page 6: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Economic Perspective: Empty Space

• Benchmark: R.M. Northam’s “Vacant urban land in the American city,” 1971– Descriptive typology stresses:

• Current formal use– E.g. Corporate reserve parcels

• Undevelopability– E.g. “Natural” physical limitations, parcel size

– No reference to previous, current informal use

Page 7: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

In Summary

• Broken Windows– Social “Bad”

• Urban Succession– Functionally Deteriorated

• Economic– Empty and waiting to be developed – Otherwise “inhospitable”

Page 8: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Improvements

• Wilk and Schiffer, 1979– Urban Archeology

• Positive and negative uses

• Bowman and Pagano, 2000– Value in “nonproductive use”

• “Convey … opportunity … informality”• Flora and fauna

• But how to link the accounts?

Page 9: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

J & W: Beyond classification

• Most complete study of dereliction, adds dynamism• Created/allowed by social, economic and cultural

forces.• “Decline begins in a landscape when structures,

built to contain efficiently and symbolize prescribed functions, prove less efficient.”

• Industrial, economic: Dereliction used as strategy to gain profit from property that is becoming obsolete by withholding required maintenance.

Page 10: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

J & W: Stages

– Inactivity, wherein plants are mothballed and guarded for future use.

– Activity persists, but disinvestment and underutilization are dominant.

– Activity persists, but structural abuse occurs. Locations used in fragmented ways, such as a couple of machine shops using small portions of massive factories.

– Inactivity, land and buildings are in complete ruin and owner is uninvolved.

– Demolition

Page 11: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Updated Stages– Pre-development, which is the character of the place before human activity.– New construction, human disruption of the environment and alteration of the land.– “Healthy” activity, during which the plant is operating efficiently. Maintenance and

replacement dominates, expansion is possible.– Activity persists, but disinvestment and underutilization are dominant.– Activity persists, but structural abuse occurs. Locations used in fragmented ways,

such as a couple of machine shops using small portions of massive factories.– Maintained inactivity, wherein plants are mothballed and guarded for future use.– Owner-monitored inactivity, wherein land and buildings are in ruin, but owner still

maintains control over grounds, perhaps through a security force.– Owner-absent inactivity, wherein land and buildings are in complete ruin and owner

is uninvolved.– Demolition.– Redevelopment, which corresponds to stage 2 above, albeit without the disruption of

the undisturbed environment.

Page 12: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Chicago

The Loop

The Works

Illinois Indiana

Page 13: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Exploration to Land Alteration

Department of War

Altered Calumet• Straightened• Dredged• Shaped southern edge

Page 14: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

True Expansion Begins

Slips constructed

Ground added

Street grid changed

Page 15: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Detail of Expansion (“reclamation”)

Railroads• Miscellaneous Dirt

and Debris• Granulated Cinders• Hot Poured Slag

Page 16: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Expansion Completed

Current land shape

Page 17: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Operation 1938

No ability to expand

Dense use

Remained in similar state for decades

Page 18: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Demolition Under Way

Combination of factors

Land use issues

Only marginally useful

• Gary electricity

Page 19: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Demolition Continues, 1999

Given clean bill of healthby US and Illinois EPAsfor use in 1994:

• Residential• Commercial

Page 20: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Nearly Present Condition

Page 21: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

1999, as Today

Page 22: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Ore Yards in 1970s

Page 23: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Ore Yards Today

Page 24: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Ore Yards Today

Page 25: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Ore Yards: Non-Human Animal Life

Page 26: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

North Side: Human and Non-Human

Page 27: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

North Side: Human and Non-Human

Page 28: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

The future

• DevelopmentDevelopment– South siteSouth site

• Solo Cup factorySolo Cup factory• Army Corps of EngineersArmy Corps of Engineers

– North siteNorth site• New parkNew park• Reroute US-41Reroute US-41• Leaving most of the land open for anythingLeaving most of the land open for anything

Page 29: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

Again, summary

• Theoretical:Theoretical:– ““Derelict” places are more complex than treated in Derelict” places are more complex than treated in

the literaturethe literature• MethodologicalMethodological

– Spatial constraints of development are importantSpatial constraints of development are important– History is important for understanding presentHistory is important for understanding present– Suggests need for future research and Suggests need for future research and

conceptualizationsconceptualizations

Page 30: A study in “dereliction” and place Just north of the Calumet River David Schalliol, University of ChicagoIVSA 2004.

The end


Recommended