Date post: | 01-Jan-2017 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | nguyenthien |
View: | 226 times |
Download: | 2 times |
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com
Volume No.04, Issue No. 03, March 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537
110 | P a g e
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEES WELFARE MEASURES
WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO MAHANADI
COLAFIED LIMITED, SAMBALPUR,
ODISHA, INDIA
Uttam kumar Das1 , Prof. (Dr.) J. K. Panda
2⃰
1,2P. G. Dept. of Business Administration, Utkal University, Vanivihar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha,(India)
ABSTRACT
Labour welfare as “the efforts to make life worth living for workmen”. The term „labour welfare‟, „employee
welfare‟, and „workers welfare‟, are used interchangeable to denote various services provided by the employers
to the employees in addition to wages. Welfare includes provision of various facilities and amenities in and
around the work-place for the better life of the employees. Employee welfare includes both statutory as well as
non-statutory activities. Employee is a back bone of every organization, without employee no work can be done.
So employee‟s satisfaction is very important. Employees will be more satisfied if they get what they expected,
job satisfaction relates to inner feelings of workers. As Mahanadi coal field are famous for coal industries, the
main aim of this study is to analyze the welfare system of coal mines employees. Personal interviews and asking
related questions have been used in this study to measure the employee welfare. The study shows that that 63%
of the sample are satisfied with the welfare system in MCL still 27% aren‟t satisfied by the effort made by MCL
toward welfare facilities. The organization may give importance to the dissatisfaction of employees behind
welfare activities should be identified and improved by the welfare department MCL.
Keywords- Employee’s Satisfaction, MCL, Non – Statutory, Statutory, Welfare Measures
I. INTRODUCTION
Welfare is comfortable living and working conditions´. Employee welfare means the efforts to make life worth
living for workman.³Welfare is comfortable living and working conditions´. People are the most important asset
of an organization, and the accounting profession has to assess and record the value and cost of people of an
organization. Once this is accepted, the need for measuring the value for recording it in the books of accounts
arises. The value of human assets can be increased substantially by making investment in their training and
welfare activities in the same way as the value of repairs/overhauling, etc. While the cost on training,
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com
Volume No.04, Issue No. 03, March 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537
111 | P a g e
development, etc., can be recorded separately and to be within the eventual, the expenditure on welfare activities
can be added to the investment and the returns judged. Unlike other assets which have depreciation value as year
passes by, value of human assets appreciates with passing years. The value can depreciate by aging process
which is generally hastened up by worries, unhealthy conditions, etc. once this process is slowed down, or at
least if the employee is made to feel young in spirits. The value of this asset appreciates considerably. Any
investment constitutes the assets of a company and therefore, any investment for welfare of labor would
constitute an extra investment in an asset. Industrial progress depends on a satisfied labor force and the
importance of labor welfare measures was stressed as early as1931, when the Royal Commission on labor
stated the benefits which go under this nomenclature, are of great importance to the worker and which he is
unable to secure by himself. The schemes of labor welfare may be regarded as a „wise investment‟ which should
and usually does bring a profitable return in the form of greater efficiency.
II.OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
The objectives of the study, "Employee Welfare system in MCL" are as follows:
2.1 The main aim of the study is to find whether welfare activities contribute to the productivity & profitability
of the organization, MCL.
2.2 To find the satisfaction level of the employee with the welfare measures taken by MCL.
2.3 To know the motives of MCL behind the welfare activities.
III. SCOPE OF THE RESEARCH
The scope of the project is limited to Mahanadi Coalfields Limited which mainly with the following:
3.1 Determining the need of further improvement in welfare measures taken by MCL.
3.2 To assess the effectiveness of welfare system.
3.3 Motivating employees; by indicating the development in welfare measures.
IV. METHODOLOGY
A systematic method was adopted for the collection of data .Both primary & secondary data were collected for
the smooth and successful completion of the study.
4.1 Primary Data Collection
The primary data was collected from the Dept. of Human Resource Development. Mainly primary data was
collected through personal interviews with the important person in HRD department by asking related questions.
V. ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE WELFARE SYSTEM IN MCL
5.1 Research Approach
To fulfill the objectives of the study the primary data collection method was adopted.
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com
Volume No.04, Issue No. 03, March 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537
112 | P a g e
5.2 Research tool
The research tool used for this project was through questionnaires. The questionnaires designed for this study
was structure and it consisted of multiple choice and close ended questions.
5.3 Sampling The sample size was 80. The collection of data was by distribution of questionnaires and asking questions to the
Employees.
Table No. 1- Statement: Satisfaction level of employee with the welfare system in MCL
Option No. Of respondents %
Highly satisfied 20 25
Satisfied 50 62.5
Less satisfied 5 6.25
Dissatisfied 5 6.25
Source: primary data
From the above table, it is observed that 62.5% of the respondents are satisfied with the welfare system in MCL.
25% of the respondents are highly satisfied where as 6.25% and 6.25 are less satisfied and dissatisfied with the
welfare system respectively.
Fig. No. 1
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com
Volume No.04, Issue No. 03, March 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537
113 | P a g e
Table No. 2- Statement: Which welfare measures mean more important for employee?
Option No. Of respondents %
Welfare measures inside work
place
10 12.5
Welfare measures outside work
place
20 25
Both 50 62.5
Source: primary data
From the above table, it is observed that for 12.5% of the respondents welfare measures inside work place is
more important and for 62.5% of the respondents both measures are important.
Fig. No. 2
Table No. 3-Statement: Are you comfortable with the working condition inside the work place?
Option No. Of respondents %
Yes 60 75
No 20 25
Source: primary data
From the above table, it is observed that 75% of the respondents are comfortable with the working condition
inside work place and 25% of the respondents are not comfortable.
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com
Volume No.04, Issue No. 03, March 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537
114 | P a g e
Fig. No. 3
Table No. 4- Statement: Inside workplace the measures should be taken care of in MCL
Option No. of respondents %
Safety 20 25
Cleanliness & up keeping of
premises
35 43.75
Provision of rest hour and breaks 15 18.75
Supply of necessary beverages 10 12.5
Source: primary data
From the above table, it is observed that cleanliness and upkeeping of premises should be taken care of feels
43.75% of the respondents while 18.75% & 12.5% each believes that provision of rest hours and breaks as well
as supply of necessary beverages should also be improved. Again 25% gives stress on improvement in safety
measures.
Fig. No. 4
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com
Volume No.04, Issue No. 03, March 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537
115 | P a g e
Table No. 5- Statement: Outside work place which measures are neglected and should be
improved
Option No. of respondents %
Community development 20 25
Housing 10 12.5
Education 30 37.5
Medical facilities 20 25
Source: primary data
From the above table, it is observed that educational facilities in MCL is neglected and should be improved feels
37.5% of respondents : 25% of each believes that medical facilities as well as community development should
be improved development should be improved and 12.5% have complaint against the housing facility.
Fig. No. 5
Table No. 6- Statement: Satisfaction level of housing or family residences according to types and rooms
Response No. of respondents %
Excellent 25 31.25
Very good 40 50
Fare 10 12.5
Poor 5 6.25
Source: primary data
From the above table, it is observed that 50% of respondents rate the housing and family residences type as
„excellent‟, where 50% rate it „very good‟ and 12.5% and 6.25% rate „fare‟ & „poor‟ respectively.
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com
Volume No.04, Issue No. 03, March 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537
116 | P a g e
Fig. No. 6
Table No.7- Statement: Do you face any problem relating to water supply and sanitation?
Option No. of respondents %
Always 0 0
Very often 10 12.5
Less often 70 87.5
Never 0 0
Source: primary data
From the above table, it is observed that 87.5% of the respondents say that they face problem relating to water
supply & sanitation less often and 12.5% says they face it very often.
Fig. No. 7
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com
Volume No.04, Issue No. 03, March 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537
117 | P a g e
Table No. 8- Statement: Happy with the community development programmes like roads,
lighting parks and play ground?
Option No. of respondents %
Yes 65 81.25
No 15 18.75
Source: primary data
From the above table, it is observed that 81.25% of the respondents are happy with the community development
programme like roads, lighting, parks & play ground while 18.75% are not happy.
Fig. No. 8
Table No.9- Statement: Level of standard of education facilities
Option No. of respondents %
Excellent 10 12.5
Very good 30 37.5
Good 40 50
Poor 0 0
Source: primary data
From the above table, it is observed that 50% of the respondents rate the educational facilities as “Good”, 37.5%
rate „very good‟ where 12.5% of respondents are highly satisfied with the educational facility and rate it
“Excellent”.
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com
Volume No.04, Issue No. 03, March 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537
118 | P a g e
Fig. No.9
Table No. 10- Statement: Satisfaction level with the health and medical services of MCL
Option No. of respondents %
Highly satisfied 25 31.25
Satisfied 50 62.5
Less satisfied 5 6.25
Dissatisfied 0 0
Source: primary data
From the above table, it is observed that 62.5% of the respondents are satisfied with the health and medical
services at MCL where 31.25% and 6.25% are „Highly satisfied‟ and „Less satisfied‟ respectively.
Fig. No. 10
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com
Volume No.04, Issue No. 03, March 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537
119 | P a g e
Table No. 11- Statement: The basic aim or objective of MCL behind welfare activities
Option No. of respondents %
To motivate employees 48 60
To maintain good will 4 5
To minimize social evils 4 5
To improve social & economic
aspect of life
24 30
Source: primary data
From the above table, it is observed that 60% of the respondents believe that the basic aim or objective behind
welfare activities of MCL is to motivate employees. Again 30% believe it is to improve social and economic
aspect of life and 5% of each believe that the aim is to minimize social evils and to maintain good will and
reputation of the company.
Fig. No.11
Table No. 12- Statement: Do you think that welfare measures contribute to the productivity and
profitability of the organization?
Option No. of respondents %
Yes 70 87.5
No 0 0
Can't say 10 12.5
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com
Volume No.04, Issue No. 03, March 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537
120 | P a g e
Source: primary data
From the above table, it is observed that Yes, welfare reassures contribute to the productivity & profitability of
the organization feels 87.5% of the respondent. But 12.5% of the respondent‟s answer are not clear.
Fig. No. 12
VI. CONCLUSION
The main aim of this study is to find the satisfied employees with the welfare facilities at MCL.
After conducting the primary study it was found that 63% of the sample are satisfied with the welfare system in
MCL, still 27% aren‟t satisfied by the effort made by MCL toward welfare facilities. The Inside work place
cleanliness and up keeping of premises should be improved and taken care of feels bulk of the employees.
Educational facilities are the major area of concern which around 40% of the respondents feel and one of the
major findings of the study. Employees are satisfied with the housing facility water supply & sanitation,
community development programmes and health & medical services at MCL.
The basic aim and objective of MCL behind welfare activities is to motivate the employees feels 60% of the
employee. Welfare measures contribute to the productivity and profitability of the organization, feels 87.5% of
the respondents.
REFERENCES
[1]. P. Ganasekaran, Labour Laws, (Aruma Pathippagam 1ST Edition, 2008, Page No: 46-59.2).
[2]. C.R. Kothari, Research Methodology Methods and techniques (2ND Edition, 2004, Newage international
(P) Ltd, Page No: 1-7.3).
[3]. S.D. Punekar, Labour Trade Unionism and Industrial Relations, (12TH
Edition, 1999, Himalaya Publishing
House, Page No. 51-60).
[4]. T. N. Chhabra, Human Resource Management (5th
Revised Edition, 2005, page no. 498-507.Dhanpath Rai
& co. (p) Ltd.)
International Journal of Science, Technology & Management www.ijstm.com
Volume No.04, Issue No. 03, March 2015 ISSN (online): 2394-1537
121 | P a g e
WEBSITE REFERENCES
[1]. www.google.com
[2]. www.wikipiedia.com
[3]. www.educationplus.com
[4]. ww.scribd.com