18) Yu, K.: Cultural variations in landscape preference: Comparisons among Chinese sub-groups and Western design experts, Landsc. Urban Plann., Vol.32, pp.107-126, 1995.

19) Steinitz, C.: Toward a sustainable landscape with high visual preference and high ecological integrity: The Loop Road in Acadia National Park, USA, Landsc. Urban Plann., Vol.19, pp.213-250, 1990.

20) Yamashita, S.: Perception and evaluation of water in landscape: Use of Photo-Projective Method to compare child and adult residents’ perceptions of a Japanese river environment, Landsc. Urban Plann., Vol.62, pp.3-17, 2002.

21) Brown, T.C. and Daniel, T. C.: Scaling of ratings: Concepts and methods, USDA Forest Service Research Paper RM-293, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, 1990.

22) Wohlwill, J.F. and Harris, G.: Response to congruity or contrast for man-made features in natural-recreation settings, Leisure Sciences, Vol.13, No.4, pp.349-365, 1980.

23) Zube, E.H., Pit, D.G. and Evans, G.W.: A lifespan development study of landscape assessment, J. Environ. Psychol., Vol.6, pp.115-128, 1983.

24) Ulrich, R.S.: Aesthetic and affective response to natutal environment. In Altman, I. and Wohlwill, J.F. (Eds.): Behavior and Natural Environment, Plenum Press, New York, Vol.6, pp.85-125, 1983.

25) Ulrich, R.S.: Human response to vegetation and landscapes, Landsc. Urban Plann., Vol.13, pp.29-44, 1986.

26) Brush, R.O. and Shafer, E.L.: Application of a landscape preference model to landscape management. In Zube, E.H., Brush, R.O. and Fabos, J.G. (Eds.): Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions and Resources, Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, pp.168-182, 1975.

27) McHarg, I.L: Design with Nature, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1992.

(2006.4.16 受付)

A Study on the Landscape Management Strategy in Niji-no-matsubaraRelationship Between the Management and the Landscape Value of Pine Forest

1( 103-0027 1-13-1)

E-mail:Taiki.Watanabe@nscp-net.com2

( 274-8501 7-24-1)

E-mail:yokouchi@ocean.cst.nihon-u.ac.jp3

( 274-8501 7-24-1)E-mail:t-okada@ocean.cst.nihon-u.ac.jp

4( 102-8539 5-4)

E-mail:a5247@n-koei.co.jp

A pine forest is lost recently by lack of change of a lifestyle of people and maintenance of a pine forest.A pine forest changes to a broadleaf tree thereby. "Hakusya-seisyo" which was the traditional landscapeof our country was not seen by becoming a broadleaf tree. The landscape peculiar to a beach and thelandscape peculiar to an area are lost in future when such situation continues. I have to lead means tomake the landscape value of a pine forest to solve this problem.Therefore, in this study, I lead "management contents of a pine forest and relevance with the landscape

value" concretely because the landscape which there was through "management of a pine forest and adaily relation" is the local landscape value.

Key Words : Landscape, Transition, LandscapeManagement, Landscape Value, Niji-no-matsubara

景観・デザイン研究論文集 　2006年

− 107 −

− 108 −

− 109 −

− 110 −

− 111 −

− 112 −

− 113 −

− 114 −