Date post: | 31-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | giacomo-chapman |
View: | 30 times |
Download: | 0 times |
A System to Measure, CommunicateSustain and Enhance HAL Value(s)
Progress Report
Doo Syen KangLori LangoneEd MahoneyDan Stynes
Matter of Relationshipsby Ben Cameron
All of us who work in the professional not-for-profit arts arena probably wish that we didn't have to make the case for the arts. Unfortunately, that's not the way life is, at least these days.
The not for profit sector by definition relies on charitable support: on average $.47 of every $1 in a theatre budget came from a contribution last year, not from the box office. And in a world where the clamor for charitable contributions has increased--where the competition is now the fire department, the school system, the AIDS clinic and more--we must be articulate about why supporting the arts is important--articulate, as often as not, to people who are not necessarily arts patrons or arts afficiandos.
The reason the economic arguments don’t make any difference is because 1) the arts cuts aren’t about money, and 2) they’re all about money.
They aren’t about money because saving $5 million or $10 million or $20 million on an arts budget is a puny thing when you’re trying to close a deficit measuring in the billions.
The arts are a good financial investment—and a cheap one, too, compared to many of the investments governments make. Proposing to eliminate arts funding isn’t about recapturing an extra few million that would have been spent on arts—it’s about making a statement: politicians demonstrating how serious they are about budget cuts.
Douglas McLennan,
ArtsJournal.com
By my estimation, a pure case for public funding of art for art’s sake hasn’t been made in more than a decade. By reducing arguments for art to economic impacts and by attaching art to laundry lists of social goods, art’s been undersold, stripped of inspiration, vision and, yes, wisdom.
Playing art as economics forces you to play by economics’ rules. That means drawing bigger audiences every year. That means improving your financial situation each quarter. And it means that others will continue to run their equations of profit and loss even when you’d rather they not (like now). Art may be a great economic investment, but if it’s not an investment someone chooses to make, you’re out of luck. Sorry, just business.
Douglas McLennan,
ArtsJournal.com
Creating Value Russell Willis Taylor
The economic arguments alone simply do not hold up. If they are a useful starting point for conversation, by all means we should use them. But they should never be the reason that we give for doing the work that we do.
In addition, being prepared to discuss why the arts improve the quality of lives, why they create societal value, should not be a matter of whining or banging the drum. It should be part of the lexicon of every arts leader who wants to have a place at the civic table
Art for Art SakeOnly
Art as an EngineFor Economic Development
A Diversity of Other Important Private &
Public Values
Art for Arts Sake Alone and Strictly Economic Arguments are not Sufficient to Make the Case for Sustainable Enhancement
In Arts, Heritage, Culture
Over the last year, there have been 59 CEDOT planning meetings between MSU and HAL staff
and 18 CEDOT public planning meetings convened by MSU/CARRS and HAL staff to
engage representatives of Michigan's cultural sector, involving more than 150 participants
CEDOT presentations have been made at 2 statewide conferences and at a national online e-
conference involving state arts agencies representing 39 states.
Arts, Heritage and Cultural Stakeholder Involvement
Participating organizations included: ArtServe Michigan, Michigan Library Association, Michigan Association of
Community Arts Agencies, Michigan Museums Association, Michigan Festivals and Events
Association, The Henry Ford, Arts League of Michigan, Wayne State University Center for Art and Public Policy,
Michigan Department of Education, State Historic Preservation Office, Michigan Historic Preservation
Network, Michigan Council for Arts and Cultural Affairs, Lawrence Technological University, Michigan
Humanities Council, National Assembly of State Arts Agencies, National Endowment for the Arts, National
Conference of State Legislators and more.
Arts, Heritage and Cultural Stakeholder Involvement
1.We need to enhance our capacity to assess feasibility and ROI of HAL facilities, programs and events.
2. We lack scientific assessments of the different values of HAL facilities, programs and events.
3. We need to be able to simulate the additional value(s) of HAL facility and program enhancements and marketing
4. We need to recognize that HAL produces a variety of different values that are more or less important to different stakeholders; we must have the capacity to measure economic impacts and verify other value(s)!
5. We must develop a positive, realistic and functional description of the value(s) of HAL!
6. We must engage and involve the HAL community – they must be partners in
the development and use of the system!
7. It is important that the results enhance
HAL entrepreneurship and community based
leadership!
Stakeholder & Market Size &
Characteristics
Economic Impact
Assessment
Performance Information
Quality of LifeImplications
CEDOT
Practical
ConsistentScientific
Accessible
CEDOT
Economic Impact Assessment
Case Studies of HAL
Non-market value(s)
Entrepreneurship & Leadership
Development
HAL Market & Service
Analyses
HAL VALUE(S) SYSTEM
Economic Impact Assessment
Case Studies of HAL
Non-market value(s)
Entrepreneurship & Leadership
Development
HAL Market & Service Analyses
HAL VALUE(S) SYSTEM
ON-LINEECONOMIC
IMPACTASESSMENT
TOOL
SCIENTIFICHAL CASESTUDIES
HALPANELS
EDUCATIONAL& LEADERSHIP
COLLABORATION
CEDOT Requirements
RECOGNIZES AND EMBRACES HAL DIVERSITY• Size and sophistication of
organizations• Venues: arts, events, heritage• Different value(s)
2. PRODUCES VALID AND RELIABLE INFORMATION NOT “FLUFF OR
POLITICALLY EXPEDIENT FABRICATIONS.”
3. TIMELY AND RESPONSIVE
• PRODUCES UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION ON A CONTINUING BASIS WITHOUT LONG DELAYS
4. PRODUCES BOTH MACRO AND MICRO
RELEVANT AND USEFUL INFORMATION
5. It can ADJUST and EVOLVE• HAL NEEDS• ISSUES
6. IT PROVIDES ACTIONABLE INFORMATION
• EDUCATION• MARKETINGS• INVESTMENTS
Overview of Flow
Art and Cultural Activities
Art, Heritage & Culture Tourism
Art Education
Arts
Professional Artists
Specific Areas
Last Tourism Trip
Library Usage
Art Consumption
Tourism
Cultural trip
Membership, Volunteering and Donation
Art Education
Prof. Artists
Art Participation
Libraries
Heritage
Cultural Tourism
Attendance
Some Preliminary Results
Note: 7,000 Surveys were conducted between 11/17 – 11-21
Preliminary results will be added to the presentation
PanelRegistration
Socio-economicsHAL Behaviors
SegmentsTrip
Profiles
DestinationsRoutes
InformationSpending
Satisfaction
Special Issues
Public SupportBarriers
Market Tests& Experiments
Public SupportBarriers
ComprehensiveKnowledge &
Understanding
PanelRegistration
Socio-economicsHAL Behaviors
SegmentsTrip
Profiles
DestinationsRoutes
InformationSpending
Satisfaction
Special Issues
Public SupportBarriers
Market Tests& Experiments
Public SupportBarriers
ComprehensiveKnowledge &
Understanding
Guidance CommitteeRFPsSpecial Requests
Economic Impact Assessment
Case Studies of HAL
Non-market value(s)
Entrepreneurship & Leadership
Development
HAL Market & Service Analyses
HAL VALUE(S) SYSTEM
ON-LINEECONOMIC
IMPACTASESSMENT
TOOL
EDUCATIONAL& LEADERSHIP
COLLABORATION
SCIENTIFICHAL CASESTUDIES
HALPANELS
• Scientific• Different Values
• Different HAL Programs• Retrievable
HAL Value(s) QL Comm Restoration Visual Pride
HAL Facilities &Programs
Libraries
Museums
Events
Theaters XXXX
XXXX
XX XX
Economic Impact
Visitor Segments•Locals•Day trips•Overnight
• Motel• VFR• Camp, etc.
Spending categories•In Museum•Lodging•Restaurant•Groceries•Gas & oil•Amusements
Sector Specific ratios/multipliers
• Capture rate• Direct ratios• Multipliers
= USE * SPENDING * MULTIPLIER