Date post: | 15-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | darin-cheever |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
A Thermoelectric Cat Warmer from Microprocessor Waste Heat
Simha Sethumadhavan Doug Burger
Department of Computer SciencesThe University of Texas at Austin
Motivation
• Hot laptops
• Cold cats– Frozen whiskers– Reduced pest control
Solution
Purr
HeatOn chip
Thermoelectric Generator
CurrentThis talk
Thermoelectricity• Thermoelectricity: Electricity produced from heat• First observed by Seebeck in 1822
ThomasSeebeck
Replica ofthe apparatus
Hot End Cold End
TH Tci
Wire
V = S.T
Traditional Uses
Cassini space probe
32.8Kg radioactive plutonium fuel, InGaAs thermocouple, 628 Watts, 3-4% efficiency
Seiko “Thermic” watches
5°C body heat, 60WDoped Poly Si, .3% efficiency
Cat Mutator
Radioactive
Plutonium Pellet
Docile
Cat
The Physics
When a wire is heated electrons and phonons diffuse
• Electrons– Higher electron diffusion more current (good)
• Phonons– Collide with other phonons and increase heat flow (bad) or– Either transfer their momentum to electrons (good) or– Lose their momentum due to boundary collisions (good)
pe
p pe
ep
ep p
e
ee
e ep
e
Phonons: heat flow
Electrons: current flow
Hot end Cold end
Traditional Materials
Constant Metals Insulators Semiconductors
Seebeck Small High Acceptable
Electrical High Very Low Variable
Thermal High X MediumHigh
Ideally for large thermoelectric current• Low phonon flow
– Const temperature difference Low thermal conductivity• Many high energy electrons
– Small resistance High electrical conductivity• Many phonon electron collisions
– Large voltage per unit temperature difference High Seebeck constant
Nanotech allows constants be controlled independently & precisely
pe
p pe
ep
ep p
e
ee
e e
Hot end Cold end
Thin film (few nanometers)
New Thin-film Wires
• Thin film and metal boundary do not align – More phonon boundary collisions – More electron phonon collisions
• Figure of Merit (M = seebeck2. elec/therm)– Traditional Poly Si is 0.4– Thin-film Bismuth Telluride is 2.38 – [Venkatasubramanium et al. Nature 2001]
Generator Efficiency
€
Efficiency = Th - Tc
Th•
1+ M −1
1+ M +Tc
Th
⎛
⎝
⎜ ⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟ ⎟ ⎟
Maximum theoretical efficiency of any generator
Temperature Difference
Max. efficiency of a Bismuth TellurideGenerator
50 7.1%
25 3.7%
Chip temperatures
• Cold end (Tc)– 27°C
• Hot end (TH)– 77° C, 52 ° C
• M for Bismuth Telluride– 6x better
Horizontal Generator
• Run a bundle of Bismuth Telluride nanowires from processor hot spot to cold spot
• Temperature difference: ~50 degrees
Die
Hot end Cold endHorizontal Generator (nanowire bundles)
Wiring Layers
Vertical Generator
Die
VerticalGenerator
Wiring Layers
Cold surface
Hot surface
• Run a bundle of Bismuth Telluride nanowires from logic level to the heat spreader
• Temperature difference: ~20 degrees
Multiple Generators
Die
VerticalGenerator
Cold surface
Hot surface
Purr
Rough Estimates
For Bismuth Telluride:• Seebeck coefficienct 243V/K• Resistivity: 1.2 x 10-5 ohm/meter
Parameters Horizontal Vertical
Length 1mm .25mm
Area 300nm x 300nm 1cm x 1cm
Resistance 13M .3
Temp Diff 50 25 (50)
Real Power .13W .15W (.6W)
Theoretical 7.1W 3.7W
Conclusions• Limitations
– Manufacturing– Engineering: Hinders cooling, peripheral circuitry overheads– Only cats are supported
• Final thoughts– Thermoelectric heat extraction looks interesting– Newer materials can improve power output further– How far can this be pushed? – When does this become interesting to architects?
Thank You!