+ All Categories
Home > Technology > AAM 2008

AAM 2008

Date post: 27-May-2015
Category:
Upload: chris-alexander
View: 698 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
These are the slides for a presentation that I gave at AAM in Denver regarding collecting visitor comments.
Popular Tags:
21
San Jose Museum of Art Collecting Visitor Comments 1 1 Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Transcript
Page 1: AAM 2008

San Jose Museum of ArtCollecting Visitor Comments

1

1Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 2: AAM 2008

Brief Overview

2

SJMA Has a reputation for engaging it’s visitors.

Always has had the typical visitor comment book.

Has branched away to many new vehicles for gathering visitor insight.

Look at each exhibition to determine the most appropriate approach.

Analog (paper) vs. Digital (“web 2.0”)

2Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 3: AAM 2008

Collecting Our Thoughts, 2001

3

3Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 4: AAM 2008

Collecting Our Thoughts, 2001

4

•Break-through exhibition.

•Visitors asked to help create dialogue around artworks.

•Comment cards supplied next to works of art or at tables in the galleries.

•Certain cards selected and turned into wall labels which went up next to the work.

•Very successful

•Written about in Museum News

4Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 5: AAM 2008

Conversation Gallery,2002-Present

•Piggy backing on the success of the Collecting Our Thoughts exhibition

•Smaller scale

•Thematic or Singular Artists

•Later tried using cell phone technology (more on that in a bit)

5

5Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 6: AAM 2008

Yoshitomo Nara:Nothing Ever Happens, 2004

6

6Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 7: AAM 2008

Yoshitomo Nara:Nothing Ever Happens, 2004

6

•First attempt at a digital comment book.

•Knew we had to allow visitor comments because of Nara’s popularity.

•It was a success for a museum of our size with 363 comments left.

•Utilized a simple database driven web interface found on the internet.

•Here are some sample comments:

6Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 8: AAM 2008

Nara Visitor Comments

7

7Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 9: AAM 2008

Nara Visitor Comments

7

7Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 10: AAM 2008

Nara Visitor Comments

7

7Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 11: AAM 2008

Nara Visitor Comments

7

7Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 12: AAM 2008

OOOPS!

8

8Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 13: AAM 2008

9

Domestic Odyssey, 2004

• Tried out digital postcards

•Not quite like collecting comments but still helped create a dialogue outside of the museum with friends

•Collected visitor emails (opt-in)

•Viral marketing

9Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 14: AAM 2008

Brides of Frankenstein, 2005

10

Furthered the idea of digital commenting from Nara

More inviting set-up

Tried to recreate a setting of 19th century environment

Created more of a dialogue by asking a question

Allowed visitors to pose their own questions

10Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 15: AAM 2008

Conversation Gallery, 2006•Attempted to recreate our popular label based commenting with cell technology.

•Not too successful

•Artwork not that engaging

•Gallery hidden in back corner

•Workflow too complicated to deliver comments by others back to our visitors immediately.

•Example comment (on-click)

11

11Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 16: AAM 2008

Conversation Gallery, 2006•Attempted to recreate our popular label based commenting with cell technology.

•Not too successful

•Artwork not that engaging

•Gallery hidden in back corner

•Workflow too complicated to deliver comments by others back to our visitors immediately.

•Example comment (on-click)

11

11Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 17: AAM 2008

“Web 2.0” 2007

•YouTube

•Flickr

•iTunes

•Reach a global audience

•Maintenance limited to moderating

•Great solution for budget conscious museums

12

12Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 18: AAM 2008

JS-Kit•Easy to use “Web 2.0” technology

•Add simple piece of JavaScript to your page

•Used on our Artist of the Week Podcast page

•Commenting

•Polling

•Ratings

13

13Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 19: AAM 2008

Paper vs. Technology

14

Still look at each exhibition to see what will work best

For Goya exhibition (2008) went with hand written comments

Provide visitors with tags which posed questions

Visitors replied with a written answer or a drawing

Had an 18th century wrought iron gate which visitors tied their tags to

Just because technology is there doesn’t mean it always needs to be used

In the future looking at the iPod Touch tour to allow for visitor comments

14Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 20: AAM 2008

Paper vs. Technology

14

Still look at each exhibition to see what will work best

For Goya exhibition (2008) went with hand written comments

Provide visitors with tags which posed questions

Visitors replied with a written answer or a drawing

Had an 18th century wrought iron gate which visitors tied their tags to

Just because technology is there doesn’t mean it always needs to be used

In the future looking at the iPod Touch tour to allow for visitor comments

14Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Page 21: AAM 2008

Contact Info

Chris AlexanderManager of Interactive TechnologySan Jose Museum of [email protected]

Slides available at: www.slideshare.com/cmalexander

15

15Tuesday, April 29, 2008


Recommended