Global Climatology of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Estimated from Remote-Sensed
Aerosol Optical Depth
Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2, Ralph Kahn3 and Robert Levy3
AGU Fall MeetingDecember 13-18, 2009
1Dalhousie University 2Harvard-Smithsonian 3NASA Goddard
We relate satellite-based measurements of aerosol optical depth to PM2.5 using a global chemical transport model
Approach
Estimated PM2.5 = η· τ Combined MODIS/MISRAerosol Optical Depth
GEOS-Chem
Following Liu et al., 2004:
• vertical structure• aerosol type• meteorological effects• meteorology• diurnal effects
η
MODIS and MISR τ
MODIS τ• 1-2 days for global coverage• Requires assumptions about
surface reflectivity
MISR τ• 6-9 days for global coverage• Simultaneous surface
reflectance and aerosol retrieval
Mean τ 2001-2006 at 0.1º x 0.1º
0 0.1 0.2 0.3τ [unitless]
MIS
RM
OD
IS
r = 0.40vs. in-situ PM2.5
r = 0.54vs. in-situ PM2.5
Agreement varies with surface type
9 surface types, defined by monthly mean surface albedo ratios,evaluation against AERONET AOD
MODIS
MISR
Jul
y
Combining MODIS and MISR improves agreement
MODISr = 0.40
(vs. in-situ PM2.5)
MISRr = 0.54
(vs. in-situ PM2.5)
CombinedMODIS/MISR
r = 0.63 (vs. in-situ PM2.5)
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
τ [u
nitle
ss]
Global CTMs can directly relate PM2.5 to τ
• Detailed aerosol-oxidant model
• 2º x 2.5º• 54 tracers, 100’s reactions• Assimilated meteorology
• Year-specific emissions• Dust, sea salt, sulfate-
ammonium-nitrate system, organic carbon, black carbon, SOA
GEOS-Chem
η[ug/m]
Significant agreement with coincident ground measurements over NA
SatelliteDerived
In-situ
Sat
ellit
e-D
eriv
ed
[μg/
m3]
In-situ PM2.5 [μg/m3]
Ann
ual M
ean
PM
2.5 [
μg/
m3]
(200
1-20
06)
r
MODIS τ 0.40
MISR τ 0.54
Combined τ 0.63
Combined PM2.5 0.78
• Annual mean measurements– Outside Canada/US– 244 sites (84 non-EU)
• r = 0.83 (0.91)• slope = 0.86 (0.84)• bias = 1.15 (-2.52) μg/m3
Method is globally applicable