+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model...

Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model...

Date post: 14-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: tabitha-pearson
View: 214 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
55
Transcript
Page 1: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 2: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Ab initio

Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product

1. Selection of the theoretical model

2. Geometry optimization

3. Frequency calculation

4. Energy calculation

5. Refining the theoretical model

Page 3: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Description of the theoretical model

QCISD(T)/6-311+G(3df,2p)//MP2/6-311G(d,p)

Energy calculation Geometry optimisation

MP2/6-311G(d,p)

basis setmethod

Page 4: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Basis Set

Page 5: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Introduction

Schrödinger equation : HΨ=EΨ

The most important result is

the ENERGYENERGY !!! Aim to adequate molecular energy

Problem: - energy is not available

Approximations:

-computer capacity

-CPU time

-size of molecule

Page 6: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Goal: select the most accurate calculation that is computationally feasible for a given molecular system

Model chemistry: theoretical method and basis set

HF MP2 CCSD CCSD(T) CCSDT … Full CI

Minimal …Split-

valence …

Polarized …

Diffuse …High

angular momentum

… … … … … … … …

∞ … Exact solution

Page 7: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 8: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Model Chemistries - three areas of consideration

• Basis sets

• Theoretical methods

QCISD(T)/6-311+G(3df,2p)//MP2/6-311G(d,p)

Energy calculation Geometry optimisation

MP2/6-311G(d,p)

basis setmethod

Page 9: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Five statements for demythologization:

Nº 1.: The term “orbital” is a synonym for the term “One-Electron” Function (OEF)

Nº 2.: A single centered OEF is synonymous with “Atomic Orbital”. A multi centered OEF is synonymous with “Molecular Orbital”.

Orbital == OEF

AO MO

Page 10: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Nº 3.: 3 ways to express a mathematical function:• Explicitly in analytical form

(hydrogen-like AOs) • As a table of numbers

(Hartree-Fock type AOs for numerous atoms) • In the form of an expansion

(expression of an MO in terms of a set of AO)

xexf )(

x f(x)

0.0 1.000

0.1 1.105

0.2 1.221

321033

22

11

00 !3

)0(

!2

)0(

!1

)0(

!0

)0()( x

fx

fx

fx

fxCxCxCxCexf x

33221100 CCCC

Five statements ….

Page 11: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Nº 4.: The generation of MOs (s) from AOs (-s) is equivalent to the transformation of an N-dimensional vector space where {}is the original set of non-orthogonal functions. After orthogonalization of the non-orthogonal AO basis set {} the orthogonal set {} is rotated to the another orthogonal set{}.

1

1

2

1

AO AO MO

orthogonalization SCF

Five statements ….

O

Page 12: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Nº 5.: There are certain differences between the shape of numerical Hartree-Fock atomic orbitals (HF-AO), the analytic Slater type orbitals (STO) and the analytic Gaussian type functions (GTF).

However , these differences are irrelevant to the final results as the MO can be expanded in terms of any of these complete sets of functions to any desired degree of accuracy.

Five statements ….

Atomic orbital basis sets

Page 13: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Basis set

• Basis functions approximate orbitals of atoms in molecule

• Linear combination of basis functions approximates total electronic wavefunction

• Basis functions are linear combinations of gaussian functions– Contracted gaussians– Primitive gaussians

Page 14: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

• Slater-type orbitals (J.C. Slater)

– Represent electron density well in valence region and beyond (not so well near nucleus)

– Evaluating these integrals is difficult

• Gaussian-type orbitals (F. Boys)

– Easier to evaluate integrals, but don’t represent electron density well

– Overcome this by using linear combination of GTOs

STOs v. GTOs

g ,r cx n y m z le r 2

d

pg

pp

s( ,r )cx n y m z le r

(Sμ)=

Page 15: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 16: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 17: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Minimal basis set

• One basis function for every atomic orbital required to describe the free atom

• Most-common: STO-3G

• Linear combination of 3 Gaussian-type orbitals fitted to one Slater-type orbital

• CH4: H(1s); C(1s,2s,2px,2py,2pz)

Page 18: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 19: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 20: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 21: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 22: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 23: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 24: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

More basis functions per atom

• Split valence basis sets

• Double-zeta: 2 “sizes” of basis functions for each valence atomic orbital – 3-21G CH4: H(1s,1s'),

C(1s,2s,2s',2px,2py,2pz,2px',2py',2pz')

• Triple-zeta: 3 “sizes” of basis functions for each valence atomic orbital– 6-311G CH4: H(1s,1s',1s''),

C(1s,2s,2s',2s'',2px,2py,2pz, 2px',2py',2pz',2px'',2py'',2pz'')

Page 25: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

More basis functions per atom

• Split valence basis sets

• Double-zeta: • Triple-zeta:

Page 26: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

36 22Total

Page 27: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

42 22Total

Page 28: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 29: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Ways to increase a basis set

• Add more basis functions per atom– allow orbitals to “change size”

• Add polarization functions – allow orbitals to “change shape”

• Add diffuse functions for electrons with large radial extent

• Add high angular momentum functions

Page 30: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Add polarization functions

• Allow orbitals to change shape– Add p orbitals to H

– Add d orbitals to 2nd row atoms

– Add f orbitals to transition metals

• 6-31G(d) - d functions per heavy atoms– Also denoted: 6-31G*

• 6-31G(d,p) - d functions per heavy atoms and p functions to H atoms– Also deonoted: 6-31G**

Page 31: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 32: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 33: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 34: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 35: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 36: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Add diffuse functions• “Large” s and p orbitals for “diffuse electrons”

– Lone pairs, anions, excited states, etc.

• 6-31+G - diffuse functions per heavy atom

• 6-31++G - diffuse functions both per heavy atom and per H atom

Page 37: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 38: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

High angular momentum functions

• “Custom-made” basis sets

• 6-31G(2d) - 2d functions per heavy atom

• 6-311++G(3df,3pd) – Triple-zeta valence– Diffuse functions on heavy atoms, H atoms– 3d, 1f functions per heavy atom; 3p, 1d

functions per H atom

Page 39: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 40: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 41: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 42: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 43: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 44: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 45: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 46: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 47: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 48: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 49: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Minimal basis setsA common naming convention for minimal basis sets is STO-XG, where X is an integer.

This X value represents the number of Gaussian primitive functions comprising a single basis function.

In these basis sets, the same number of Gaussian primitives comprise core and valence orbitals.

Minimal basis sets typically give rough results that are insufficient for research-quality publication,

but are much cheaper than their larger counterparts. Here is a list of commonly used minimal basis sets:

STO-2G STO-3G STO-6G STO-3G* - Polarized version of STO-3G

Page 50: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Split-valence basis setsDuring most molecular bonding, it is the valence electrons which principally take part in the bonding. In recognition of this fact, it is common to represent valence orbitals by more than one basis function, (each of which can in turn be composed of a fixed

linear combination of primitive Gaussian functions). The notation for these split-valence basis sets is typically X-YZg. In this case, X represents the number primitive Gaussians comprising each core atomic orbital basis function.

The Y and Z indicate that the valence orbitals are composed of two basis functions each

Here is a list of commonly used split-valence basis sets:3-21g 3-21g* - Polarized 3-21+g - Diffuse functions 3-21+g* - With polarization and diffuse functions 6-31g 6-31g* 6-31+g* 6-31g(3df, 3pd) 6-311g 6-311g* 6-311+g* SV(P) SVP

Page 51: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Double, triple, quadruple zeta basis setsBasis sets in which there are multiple basis functions corresponding to each atomic orbital,

including both valence orbitals and core orbitals or just the valence orbitals, are called double, triple, or quadruple-zeta basis sets. Here is a list of commonly used multiple zeta basis sets:

multiple zeta basis sets:cc-pVDZ - Double-zeta cc-pVTZ - Triple-zeta cc-pVQZ - Quadruple-zeta cc-pV5Z - Quintuple-zeta, etc. aug-cc-pVDZ, etc. - Augmented versions of the preceding basis sets with added diffuse functions TZVPP - Triple-zeta QZVPP - Quadruple-zeta

Page 52: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 53: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 54: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.
Page 55: Ab initio Reactant – Transition State Structure – Product 1.Selection of the theoretical model 2.Geometry optimization 3.Frequency calculation 4.Energy.

Recommended