+ All Categories
Home > Documents > AB SCIEX Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons … · China, which contribute to the release...

AB SCIEX Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons … · China, which contribute to the release...

Date post: 03-May-2018
Category:
Upload: vannhi
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
7
p 1 Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), Alkylated Derivatives, and Photo-degradation Products in Environmental and Food Samples using LC-FLD-MS/MS with Q TRAP ® Technology Takeo Sakuma 1 , Daniel Leigh 2 , Carmai Seto 1 , André Schreiber 1 , and Rebecca Wittrig 3 1 AB SCIEX Concord, Ontario (Canada); 2 AB SCIEX Warrington (UK); 3 Restek Corporation, Bellefonte, Pennsylvania (USA) Overview A new liquid chromatography (LC) method was developed that separates 26 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), 6 alkylated derivatives, and 11 photo-oxidation products in a single LC run followed by sensitive fluorescence detection (FLD) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap (4000 Q TRAP ® and QTRAP ® 5500 systems) were operated in highly selective Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) with automatic acquisition of fast and sensitive enhanced product ion (EPI) scan to enable quantitation and compound identification in the same analytical run. Three ionization modes, Electrospray (ESI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), and atmospheric pressure photo ionization (APPI) were examined. The developed method was applied to drinking water, atmospheric particulate, and seafood samples. Introduction There have been a number of maritime crude oil spills and explosions, like the 1989 Exxon Valdez accident in Prince William Sound Alaska releasing ~100 million gallons, the 2010 BP accident in the Gulf of Mexico releasing over 200 million gallons, and the 2011 Conoco-Phillips accident in North Eastern China, which contribute to the release of PAH and related compounds into the aquatic environment. PAH, their alkylated derivatives, and photo-oxidation products are priority pollutants because of their carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic properties. Hence, the presence of PAH in sea water is of great concern for the aquatic environment and for the fishing and seafood producing industry, as PAH are bioavailable to fish and seafood, and thus enter dietary sources. These PAH, alkylated derivatives and photo-oxidation products have a number of isomers and traditionally they are analyzed by GC or GC-MS. However, the analytical run time is significantly long, because these isomers have to be chromatographically separated. In addition, some of the polar photo-degradation products are not amenable to GC. In this study we investigated three LC-MS/MS ionization techniques and several small particle-size PAH LC columns to separate these isomers within a reasonable time and sensitivity. The resulting LC-FLD-MS/MS method was successfully applied to the analysis of environmental and seafood samples. Experimental Chemicals A number of PAH, alkylated derivatives, and photo-oxidation products were obtained from Restek (Bellefonte, PA), Sigma- Aldrich Canada (Oakville, ON) and Ultra Scientific (N. Kingstown, RI). The structures of these standards are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1.
Transcript
Page 1: AB SCIEX Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons … · China, which contribute to the release of PAH and related compounds into the aquatic environment. ... naphthalene-d8 136

p 1

Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH), Alkylated Derivatives, and Photo-degradation Products in Environmental and Food Samples using LC-FLD-MS/MS with Q TRAP® Technology Takeo Sakuma1, Daniel Leigh2, Carmai Seto1, André Schreiber1, and Rebecca Wittrig3 1AB SCIEX Concord, Ontario (Canada); 2AB SCIEX Warrington (UK); 3Restek Corporation, Bellefonte, Pennsylvania (USA)

Overview A new liquid chromatography (LC) method was developed that separates 26 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), 6 alkylated derivatives, and 11 photo-oxidation products in a single LC run followed by sensitive fluorescence detection (FLD) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap (4000 Q TRAP® and QTRAP® 5500 systems) were operated in highly selective Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) with automatic acquisition of fast and sensitive enhanced product ion (EPI) scan to enable quantitation and compound identification in the same analytical run.

Three ionization modes, Electrospray (ESI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), and atmospheric pressure photo ionization (APPI) were examined. The developed method was applied to drinking water, atmospheric particulate, and seafood samples.

Introduction There have been a number of maritime crude oil spills and explosions, like the 1989 Exxon Valdez accident in Prince William Sound Alaska releasing ~100 million gallons, the 2010 BP accident in the Gulf of Mexico releasing over 200 million gallons, and the 2011 Conoco-Phillips accident in North Eastern China, which contribute to the release of PAH and related compounds into the aquatic environment.

PAH, their alkylated derivatives, and photo-oxidation products are priority pollutants because of their carcinogenic, mutagenic, and teratogenic properties. Hence, the presence of PAH in sea water is of great concern for the aquatic environment and for the fishing and seafood producing industry, as PAH are bioavailable to fish and seafood, and thus enter dietary sources.

These PAH, alkylated derivatives and photo-oxidation products have a number of isomers and traditionally they are analyzed by GC or GC-MS. However, the analytical run time is significantly

long, because these isomers have to be chromatographically separated. In addition, some of the polar photo-degradation products are not amenable to GC.

In this study we investigated three LC-MS/MS ionization techniques and several small particle-size PAH LC columns to separate these isomers within a reasonable time and sensitivity.

The resulting LC-FLD-MS/MS method was successfully applied to the analysis of environmental and seafood samples.

Experimental Chemicals

A number of PAH, alkylated derivatives, and photo-oxidation products were obtained from Restek (Bellefonte, PA), Sigma-Aldrich Canada (Oakville, ON) and Ultra Scientific (N. Kingstown, RI). The structures of these standards are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1.

Page 2: AB SCIEX Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons … · China, which contribute to the release of PAH and related compounds into the aquatic environment. ... naphthalene-d8 136

p 2

Figure 1. Structures of targeted PAH, alkylated derivatives, and photo-degradation products (Compounds in bold are the 16 EPA priority PAH.)

OH

2-naphthol

benzo(e)pyrene perylene

naphthalene azulene

CH3

1-methylnaphthalene

CH3

2-methylnaphthalene

O

O

1,2-naphthoquinone

O

O

1,4-naphthoquinone

anthracene phenanthrene

OH

9-phenanthrol

biphenyl acenaphtheneacenaphthylene

CH3

CH3

2,6-dimethylnaphthalene

fluorene

OH

1-acenaphthenol

9-fluorenone

O

9-hydroxyfluorene

OH S

dibenzothiophene

CH3

CH3

CH3

2,3,5-trimethyl-naphthalene

CH3

1-methylphenanthrene pyrenefluoranthene

triphenylene benzo(b)anthracene

benzo(b)fluoranthene benzo(j)fluoranthene benzo(k)fluoranthene

OH

1-naphthol

1-hydroxypyrene

OH

chrysene

benzo(a)pyrene

benzo(a)anthracene

CH3

CH3

7,12-dimethylbenzo(a)anthracene

O

9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7-one

indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene benzo(ghi)perylene

dibenzo(a,h)anthracene pentacene coronene rubrene

Page 3: AB SCIEX Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons … · China, which contribute to the release of PAH and related compounds into the aquatic environment. ... naphthalene-d8 136

p 3

Sample Preparation

Seafood samples were prepared by Restek as per NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-59.1 An atmospheric particulate sample was collected with a polyurethane disk sampler and extracted with a Soxhlet tube by Environment Canada, Ontario Region as per Environment Canada Protocol No.EC-HAP-C-05.2 Some carcinogenic PAH’s were incubated to form Phase I metabolites in rat liver microsomes for 1 hour at 37°C under oxidative conditions.

LC

A Shimadzu NEXERA UHPLC system with a UV detector (SPD-20AV), a fluorescence detector (RF-20A XS) followed by MS/MS confirmation was used for analysis. For drinking water analysis a CTC PAL autosampler was used to enable large volume injection and extended wash cycles to reduce carry-over. Separation was achieved using an Inertsil ODS-P HP (250x2.1 mm) 3 μm column (GL Sciences, Tokyo, Japan), and a Kinetex C18 (50 x 2.1 mm) 2.7 μm column with a mobile phase of water and acetonitrile. The column oven temperature was set to 20°C. A 30 minute multi-step gradient was required to separate critical isomers (Table 2).

Table 1. MRM transitions used to detect PAH, alkylated derivatives, and photo-degradation products

Analyte Q1 Q3

(quantifier) Q3

(qualifier) Analyte Q1 Q3

(quantifier) Q3

(qualifier)

naphthalene 128 78 102 9-phenanthrol 194 151 166

azulene 128 78 102 fluoranthene 202 150 200

naphthalene-d8 136 84 108 pyrene 202 150 200

1-methylnaphthalene 142 89 115 1-hydroxypyrene 219 190 201

2-methylnaphthalene 142 115 141 chrysene 228 200 226

1-naphthol 145 63 122 triphenylene 228 200 226

2-naphthol 145 63 122 benzo(a)anthracene 228 150 226

acenaphthylene 152 126 151 benzo(b)anthracene 228 202 226

acenaphthene 154 126 153 chrysene-d12 240 208 236

biphenyl 154 126 153 benzo(b)fluoranthene 252 224 250

2,6-dimethylnaphthalene 156 115 141 benzo(j)fluoranthene 252 224 250

1,2-naphthoquinone 159 103 131 benzo(k)fluoranthene 252 224 250

1,4-naphthoquinone 159 103 131 benzo(a)pyrene 252 224 250

acenaphthene-d10 164 132 162 benzo(e)pyrene 252 222 250

fluorene 166 115 165 perylene 252 224 250

2,3,5-trimethylnaphthalene 170 128 153 7,12-dimethylbenzo(a)anthracene 257 226 242

1-acenaphthenol 171 46 72 perylene-d12 264 232 260

anthracene 178 152 176 9,10-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene-7-one 271 215 253

phenanthrene 178 151 176 benzo(ghi)perylene 276 248 274

9-fluorenone 181 127 152 indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 276 246 274

9-hydroxyfluorene 182 165 95 dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 278 248 276

dibenzothiophene 184 139 152 pentacene 278 250 276

phenanthrene-d10 188 158 184 coronene 300 296 298

1-methylphenathrene 192 165 191 rubrene 533 377 455

Page 4: AB SCIEX Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons … · China, which contribute to the release of PAH and related compounds into the aquatic environment. ... naphthalene-d8 136

p 4

Table 2. LC gradient used for the separation of PAH, alkylated derivatives, and photo-degradation products

Time (min) Flow (μL/min) A (%) B (%)

0.0 0.5 60 40

7.0 0.5 40 60

16.0 0.5 0 100

19.0 1.0 0 100

25.0 0.5 0 100

25.1 0.5 60 40

30.0 0.5 60 40

MS/MS

MS/MS detection was performed on an AB SCIEX 4000 Q TRAP® and QTRAP® 5500 equipped with Turbo V™ source. ESI, APCI, and APPI techniques were investigated during method development. Selective and sensitive MRM mode was used for detection. Two transitions were monitored for each analyte to allow quantitation and identification using the ratio of quantifier and qualifier ion (Table 1). In addition, EPI spectra were acquired to use the molecular fingerprint saved into the MS/MS spectrum to increase the confidence of identification.

Results and Discussion An example LC-FLD-MS/MS run is presented in Figure 2. The separation of critical isomers is highlighted in Figure 3.

Figure 2: LC-MS/MS (top) and LC-FLD (bottom) analysis of PAH, alkylated derivatives, and photo-degradation products

Different detection and ionization techniques were investigated and compared regarding their selectivity, sensitivity, and linear dynamic range. Benzo(a)pyrene was used as a model compound for this study (Table 3).

The UV detection at 254 nm suffered from high background and low specificity. FLD using optimized excitation wavelength and emission wavelength offered highest sensitivity, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.1 ng/mL, but selectivity was limited in comparison to MS/MS detection.

ESI was found to give highest sensitivity of all ionization techniques, however, ESI showed strong matrix effects. APPI was investigated using different dopants, including toluene, anisol, and chlorobenzene. Chlorbenzene was found to give highest sensitivity for benzo(a)pyrene, however, background noise was increased and thus LOD was higher in comparison to ESI and APCI. Higher selectivity and sensitivity were achieved using APCI. In addition, APCI offers the advantage of increased robustness and minimal matrix effects.

As a result APCI was chosen for further LC-MS/MS analysis. The example calibration line presented in Figure 4 highlights the excellent linearity and reproducibility.

LC-FLD and LC-MS/MS are complementary techniques for high sensitivity for quantitation with very little matrix interferences. While LODs of the quantitation of PAH are very similar using both techniques LC-MS/MS is able to ionize polar metabolites and degradation products more efficiently, thus, allowing quantitation at lower levels.

Table 3. Limits of detection (LOD) and linearity of different detection and ionization techniques of benzo(a)pyrene using the 4000 Q TRAP® system using an injection volume of 10 μL

Detection by LOD (ng/mL) Linearity Additional comment

UV 10 10 – 1000 high background

FLD 0.1 0.1 – 1000

ESI 0.1 0.1 – 100 matrix effects

APCI 1.0 1 – 1000

APPI 10 10 – 1000 high background

XIC of +MRM (76 pairs): 128.060/78.050 Da ID: naphthalene_78 from Sample 16 (fresh SCIEX PAH mix dil 100 pg_uL) of Cal RF-20Axs ... Max. 1.8e4 cps.

8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0Time, min

0.0

2.0e4

4.0e4

6.0e4

8.0e4

1.0e5

1.2e5

1.4e5

1.6e5

1.8e5

2.0e5

2.2e5

Inte

nsity

, cps

Shimadzu LC Controller Detector A, Channel 1 from Sample 16 (fresh SCIEX PAH mix dil 100 pg_uL) of Cal RF-20Axs 5-um NC.wiff, Added ... Max. 3.6e5 .

8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0Time, min

0.0

5.0e4

1.0e5

1.5e5

2.0e5

2.5e5

3.0e5

3.5e5

AU

/uV

8.25

14.3015.77

18.1217.5115.1316.5712.519.67

76 MRM transitions

Fluorescence

Page 5: AB SCIEX Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons … · China, which contribute to the release of PAH and related compounds into the aquatic environment. ... naphthalene-d8 136

p 5

Figure 4. Calibration line of benzo(a)pyrene using triplicate injections into LC-MS/MS with APCI

Examples of using the developed method for the analysis of PAH, alkyl derivatives, and photo-oxidation products in a variety in environmental and food samples are presented in Figures 5 to 7.

Figure 5. Analysis of an oyster extract using traditional MRM and the Scheduled MRM™ algorithm

Figure 5 shows LC-MS/MS chromatograms of the analysis of an oyster extract. The acquisition of traditional MRM mode is compared to an acquisition using the Scheduled MRM™ algorithm. Target analytes are monitored only in short time windows around the expected retention time using the Scheduled MRM™ algorithm. As a result the scheduling

BaP 5-ul injection.rdb (252 - 224): "Linear" Regression ("1 / x" weighting): y = 100 x + -2.33 (r = 0.9983)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000Concentration, ng/mL

0.05000.01.0e41.5e42.0e42.5e43.0e43.5e44.0e44.5e45.0e45.5e46.0e46.5e47.0e47.5e48.0e48.5e49.0e49.5e41.0e51.1e5

Are

a, co

unts

XIC of +MRM (76 pairs): 128.060/78.050 Da ID: naphthalene_78 from Sample 38 (OYS 0-3 + 500 uL ACN) of Oyster NC=5 uA RF-20Axs... Max. 3.0e4 cps.

9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0Time, min

0.0

1.0e4

2.0e4

3.0e4

4.0e4

5.0e4

6.0e4

Inte

nsity

, cps

15.61

14.1813.15

14.91

XIC of +MRM (76 pairs): 128.060/78.050 amu Expected RT: 9.6 ID: naphthalene_78 from Sample 68 (OYS 0-3 + 500 uL ACN) of PAH ca... Max. 3.5e4 cps.

9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0Time, min

0.0

2000.0

4000.0

6000.0

8000.0

1.0e4

1.2e4

1.4e4

Inte

nsity

, cps

9.72 9.85

Non-scheduled MRM

Scheduled MRM

XIC of +MRM (76 pairs): 128.060/78.050 Da ID: naphthalene_78 from Sample 38 (OYS 0-3 + 500 uL ACN) of Oyster NC=5 uA RF-20Axs... Max. 3.0e4 cps.

9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0Time, min

0.0

1.0e4

2.0e4

3.0e4

4.0e4

5.0e4

6.0e4

Inte

nsity

, cps

15.61

14.1813.15

14.91

XIC of +MRM (76 pairs): 128.060/78.050 amu Expected RT: 9.6 ID: naphthalene_78 from Sample 68 (OYS 0-3 + 500 uL ACN) of PAH ca... Max. 3.5e4 cps.

9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0Time, min

0.0

2000.0

4000.0

6000.0

8000.0

1.0e4

1.2e4

1.4e4

Inte

nsity

, cps

9.72 9.85

Non-scheduled MRM

Scheduled MRM

Traditional MRM

Scheduled MRM™ algorithm

Figure 3. Separation of critical isomers using the developed LC method

A: C10H8 azulene, naphthalene

B: C11H10 1-methylnaphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene

C: C14H10 anthracene, phenanthrene

D: C18H12 benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(b)anthracene, chrysene, triphenylene

E: C20H12 benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(j)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(e)pyrene, perylene

F: C22H12 benzo(ghi)perylene, indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, C22H14 dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0 8.2 8.4 8.6 8.8 9.0 9.2 9.4 9.6 9.8 10.0 10.2 10.4Time, min

0.0

2.0e4

4.0e4

6.0e4

8.0e4

1.0e5

1.2e5

1.4e5

1.6e5

1.8e5

2.0e5

2.2e5

2.4e5

2.6e5

2.8e5

3.0e5

3.2e5

3.4e5

3.6e5

3.8e5

4.0e58.45

Azulene

Naphthalene

6.6 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0 8.2 8.4 8.6 8.8 9.0 9.2 9.4 9.6 9.8 10.0 10.2 10.4Time, min

0.0

2.0e4

4.0e4

6.0e4

8.0e4

1.0e5

1.2e5

1.4e5

1.6e5

1.8e5

2.0e5

2.2e5

2.4e5

2.6e5

2.8e5

3.0e5

3.2e5

3.4e5

3.6e5

3.8e5

4.0e58.45

Azulene

Naphthalene

9.7 9.8 9.9 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 12.0Time, min

0.0

1.0e4

2.0e4

3.0e4

4.0e4

5.0e4

6.0e4

7.0e4

8.0e4

9.0e4

1.0e5

1.1e5

1.2e5

1.3e5

1.4e5

1.5e5

1.6e5

1.7e5

1.8e5

1.9e5

2.0e5

2.1e5

2.2e5

2.3e510.40

10.77

1-methylnaphthalne

2-methylnaphthalene

9.7 9.8 9.9 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 12.0Time, min

0.0

1.0e4

2.0e4

3.0e4

4.0e4

5.0e4

6.0e4

7.0e4

8.0e4

9.0e4

1.0e5

1.1e5

1.2e5

1.3e5

1.4e5

1.5e5

1.6e5

1.7e5

1.8e5

1.9e5

2.0e5

2.1e5

2.2e5

2.3e510.40

10.77

1-methylnaphthalne

2-methylnaphthalene

10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min

0.0

5000.0

1.0e4

1.5e4

2.0e4

2.5e4

3.0e4

3.5e4

4.0e4

4.5e4

5.0e4

5.5e4

6.0e4

6.5e4

7.0e47.2e4 13.69

12.55

PhenanthreneAnthracene

10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5Time, min

0.0

5000.0

1.0e4

1.5e4

2.0e4

2.5e4

3.0e4

3.5e4

4.0e4

4.5e4

5.0e4

5.5e4

6.0e4

6.5e4

7.0e47.2e4 13.69

12.55

PhenanthreneAnthracene

15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0 27.0Time, min

0.0

2.0e4

4.0e4

6.0e4

8.0e4

1.0e5

1.2e5

1.4e5

1.6e5

1.8e5

2.0e5

2.2e5

2.4e5

2.6e5

2.8e5

3.0e5

x 40.018.45

16.99

19.25

20.8719.91

24.31

21.93 23.00

Triphenylene Benzo(a)anthracene

Chrysene

Benzo(b)anthracene

15.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 26.0 27.0Time, min

0.0

2.0e4

4.0e4

6.0e4

8.0e4

1.0e5

1.2e5

1.4e5

1.6e5

1.8e5

2.0e5

2.2e5

2.4e5

2.6e5

2.8e5

3.0e5

x 40.018.45

16.99

19.25

20.8719.91

24.31

21.93 23.00

Triphenylene Benzo(a)anthracene

Chrysene

Benzo(b)anthracene

20.6 20.8 21.0 21.2 21.4 21.6 21.8 22.0 22.2 22.4 22.6 22.8 23.0 23.2 23.4 23.6 23.8 24.0 24.2 24.4 24.6 24.8 25.0Time, min

0.0

1.0e5

2.0e5

3.0e5

4.0e5

5.0e5

6.0e5

7.0e5

8.0e5

9.0e5

1.0e6

1.1e6

1.2e6

1.3e6

1.4e6

1.5e61.5e6 20.85

21.91

24.31

22.97

Benzo(j)fluoranthene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Perylene

Benzo(e)pyrene

BbF

20.6 20.8 21.0 21.2 21.4 21.6 21.8 22.0 22.2 22.4 22.6 22.8 23.0 23.2 23.4 23.6 23.8 24.0 24.2 24.4 24.6 24.8 25.0Time, min

0.0

1.0e5

2.0e5

3.0e5

4.0e5

5.0e5

6.0e5

7.0e5

8.0e5

9.0e5

1.0e6

1.1e6

1.2e6

1.3e6

1.4e6

1.5e61.5e6 20.85

21.91

24.31

22.97

Benzo(j)fluoranthene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Perylene

Benzo(e)pyrene

BbF

23.5 24.0 24.5 25.0 25.5 26.0 26.5 27.0 27.5 28.0 28.5 29.0 29.5 30.0 30.5 31.0 31.5 32.0 32.5 33.0 33.5 34.0 34.5Time, min

0.0

1.0e4

2.0e4

3.0e4

4.0e4

5.0e4

6.0e4

7.0e4

8.0e4

9.0e4

1.0e5

1.1e5

1.2e5

1.3e5

1.4e5

1.5e5

1.6e5

1.7e5

1.8e5

1.9e5

2.0e5

2.1e5

2.2e5

2.3e5

2.4e5

2.5e530.42

26.45

28.66

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

cascadingBenzo(ghi)perylene

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

A B C

D E F

CH3

CH3

Page 6: AB SCIEX Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons … · China, which contribute to the release of PAH and related compounds into the aquatic environment. ... naphthalene-d8 136

p 6

decreases the number of concurrent MRM transitions, allowing both the cycle time and the dwell time to be optimized for highest sensitivity, accuracy, and reproducibility. In addition, data exploration is easier because of a more selective acquisition removing many of the matrix interferences.

Figure 6. Detection of PAH, alkyl derivatives, and photo-oxidation products in an atmospheric particulate sample

Figure 6 shows a chromatogram of the detection of target analytes in an atmospheric particulate sample collected with a polyurethane disk sampler and after Soxhlet extraction. The ratio of two MRM transition monitored for each compound was used for identify target analytes with high confidence.

Figure 7. Parts-per-trillion level (ppt) detection of benzo(a)pyrene in drinking water. The direct injection of 1 mL into LC-MS/MS allowed quantitation with an LOD of less than 1 ng/L using the QTRAP® 5500 system.

Figure 7 shows the analysis of drinking water samples spiked with low levels of benzo(a)pyrene using the AB SCIEX

QTRAP® 5500 system. A Phenomenex Kinetex C18 (50 x 2.1mm) column with a 5.5 min gradient was used to speed up the analytical run time.

The direct injection of 1 mL of sample was used successfully to quantify PAH with an LOD below 1 ng/L. The Signal-to-noise (S/N) at a concentration of 1ng/L was >10 using a 3x standard deviation algorithm. Repeat injections (n=5) at the 1 ng/L concentration level resulted in less than 5% coefficient of variation. Excellent accuracy (91 to 114%) and linearity (r = 0.9995) was found over the concentration range of interest 1 to 100 ng/L besides the injection of a large volume of 1 mL.

Figure 8. Metabolism of benzo(a)pyrene (top, adapted from IRAC 2010) and identification of benzo(a)pyreneepoxide using full scan MS/MS scanning using the QTRAP® 5500 system after incubation (note: the position of the epoxy group cannot be confirmed with MS/MS)

Figure 8 shows an example spectrum of a benzo(a)pyrene sample incubated with rat liver microsomes for 1 hour at 37°C under oxidative conditions to produce in vitro metabolites.

XIC of +MRM (76 pairs): 128.060/78.050 amu Expected RT: 9.6 ID: naphthalene_78 from Sample 3 (Air sample) of Environment Canada.... Max. 4.7e4 cps.

7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 15.5 16.0 16.5 17.0Time, min

0.0

5.0e4

1.0e5

1.5e5

2.0e5

2.5e5

3.0e5

3.5e5

4.0e5

4.5e5

5.0e5

5.5e5

Inte

nsity

, cps

9.72

9.919.369.21

Scheduled MRM™ algorithm

blank 0.1 ng/L

0.5 ng/L 1 ng/L

45

1112 1

2

3

6

10

78

9

glucuronides and sulfates

benzo(a)pyrene

epoxides(4,5- 7,8- 9,10-)

dihydrodiols(4,5- 7,8- 9,10-)

dihydrodiol epoxides(7,8-diol-9,10-epoxide9,10-diol-7,8-epoxide)

GSH conjugates

glucuronides and sulfates

GSH conjugates

phenols

phenol diols

tetraols

quinones

GSH conjugates

+MS2 (267.10) CE (55): Period 3, 20.522 to 20.848 min from Sample 5 (Benzo(a)pyrene incubate) of pos Q3 incubation study_MSMS.wi... Max. 6.4e5 cps.

80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340m/z, Da

0.0

5.0e4

1.0e5

1.5e5

2.0e5

2.5e5

3.0e5

3.5e5

4.0e5

4.5e5

5.0e5

5.5e5

6.0e5

6.4e5

x 25.0239.1

238.3

99.0

267.1

-28 Da

+14 Da

H2C=CH2

O

Page 7: AB SCIEX Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons … · China, which contribute to the release of PAH and related compounds into the aquatic environment. ... naphthalene-d8 136

For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.

© 2011 AB SCIEX. The trademarks mentioned herein are the property of AB Sciex Pte. Ltd. or their respective owners. AB SCIEX™ is being used under license.

Publication number: 4520411-01 Headquarters International Sales 353 Hatch Drive Foster City CA 500 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA 01701 USA For our office locations please call the division Phone 508-383-7700 headquarters or refer to our website at www.absciex.com www.absciex.com/offices

Summary A study was conducted to develop a robust and sensitive LC-FLD-MS/MS method using the AB SCIEX QTRAP® 5500 system for selective and sensitive MS/MS detection of PAH, alkylated derivatives, and photo-oxidation products. Three ionization modes, ESI, APCI, and APPI were investigated. APCI was found to give best results with respect to sensitivity, robustness and smallest matrix effects.

Two LC methods were developed, one to separate isomers and the other one to quickly quantify benzo(a)pyrene by direct injection of drinking water.

The method was successfully applied to the analysis of environmental and seafood samples. In addition, microsome incubations were performed to study the metabolism of PAH.

Acknowledgement The authors wish to thank Jack Cochran and Rebecca Wittrig of Restek (Bellefonte, PA) for seafood extracts, Susan Genualdi and Mahiba Shoeib of Environment Canada for atmospheric samples, Curtis Campbell and Masatoshi Takahashi of Shimadzu (Columbia, MD) for providing the NEXERA UHPLC system.

References 1 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-59: ‘Extraction,

Cleanup, and Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Sediments and Tissues for Organic Contaminants’ (2004)

2 Environment Canada Protocol No.EC-HAP-C-05

3 International Agency for Research on Cancer: ‘IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans’ 92 (2010) 518-519


Recommended