+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Date post: 24-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: peers
View: 77 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al. Legal Issues in Abbeville. The trial of this case does not come to us on a blank slate The Supreme Court has said that in addition to adequate and safe facilities, the legislature must provide each child the opportunity to acquire - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
39
Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.
Transcript
Page 1: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Abbevillev.

The State of South Carolina, et al.

Page 2: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Legal Issues in Abbeville The trial of this case does not come to us on a blank slate The Supreme Court has said that in addition to adequate

and safe facilities, the legislature must provide each child the opportunity to acquire a “minimally adequate education,” which the Supreme

Court broadly outlined as: The ability to read, write, and speak the English

language, and knowledge of mathematics and physical science;

A fundamental knowledge of economics, social, and political systems, and of history and governmental processes; and

Academic and vocational skills

Page 3: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

The South Carolina Constitution Mandates:

“The general Assembly shall provide for the maintenance and support of a system of free public schools open to all children in the state.” S.C. Const. Act XI, §3

Page 4: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Why Do We Need A Law Suit?

Page 5: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

What Do The Test Results Show? Below basic percentages 2003 PACT scores

Allendale49% Math57% Eng.

Dillon 238% Math42% Eng.

Florence 448% Math50% Eng.

Hampton 259% Math54% Eng.

Jasper54% Math53% Eng.

Lee51% Math51% Eng.

Marion 752% Math54% Eng.

Orangeburg 344% Math44% Eng.

Page 6: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

A

Page 7: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Who Are The Plaintiffs?

Page 8: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

The Plaintiffs are:%Minority

48.1

88.4 94.3

72.486

98.783.3

95.586.8 89.9

0

20

4060

80

100

120 State

Plaintiffs

Allendale

Dillon 2

Florence 4

Hampton 2

Jasper

Lee

Marion 7

Orangeburg 3

Page 9: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

The Plaintiffs are:Free Reduced

55

86 90 85 88 8578

87 89 84

0102030405060708090

100State

Plaintiffs

Allendale

Dillon 2

Florence 4

Hampton 2

Jasper

Lee

Marion 7

Orangeburg 3

Page 10: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Percentage of Schools Unsatisfactory and Below Average State vs. Plaintiff Districts, 2003

PlaintiffDistricts75%

State17.4%

Page 11: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Percentage Schools in Plaintiff Districts Rated Unsatisfactory or Below Average 2001 to 2003

Schools neverrated BA or USchools U or BAat least once

87% of schools in plaintiff districts rated U or BA at least once over three years

79% of schools in plaintiff districts ranked U or BA 3 years in a row

Page 12: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Percentage Schools in Plaintiff Districts Moving out of Unsatisfactory or Below Average Ratings between 2001 and 2003

Schools RatedU or BA in2001 and stillin 2003

12.5% moved toAverage or above in 2003

Page 13: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Are Children Receiving/Realizing Adequate Educational Opportunities Drop out rates:

Allendale60%

Dillon 243%

Florence 466%

Hampton 254%

Jasper61%

Lee67%

Orangeburg 348%

Marion 344%

Marion 444%

Page 14: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Brown v. Board of Education347 U.S. 483 (1954)

“We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”

Page 15: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Hampton County Profile:Ethnicity

White 45.50%

Black 54.30%

Other 0.60%

WhiteBlackOther

South Carolina Education Profiles 2001

Page 16: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Hampton 2 Education Profile:Student Ethnicity

South Carolina Education Profiles 2001

White 1.50%

Black 96.50%

Other 1.90%

WhiteBlackOther

Page 17: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Lee County ProfileEthnicity

South Carolina Education Profiles 2001

White 36.50%

Black 62.70%

Other 1.10%

WhiteBlackOther

Page 18: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Lee County Education Profile:Student Ethnicity

South Carolina Education Profiles 2001

Black 93.10%

Other 0.50% White

6.40%

WhiteBlackOther

Page 19: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Jasper County Profile:Ethnicity

South Carolina Education Profiles 2001

White 41.50%

Black 58.10%

Other 1.10%

WhiteBlackOther

Page 20: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Jasper County Education Profile:Student Ethnicity

South Carolina Education Profiles 2001

Black 80.60%

Other 6.10%

White 13.30%

WhiteBlackOther

Page 21: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

38.6

47.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

% of Teachers with Advanced Degrees

Plaintiff Non-Plaintiff

Student Characteristics and Teacher Qualifications For Plaintiff & Non-Plaintiff Districts

Page 22: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

69.2

81.4

50

60

70

80

90

100

% of Teachers on Continuing Contracts

Plaintiff Non-Plaintiff

Student Characteristics and Teacher Qualifications For Plaintiff & Non-Plaintiff Districts

Page 23: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

4.4

2.6

0

1

2

3

4

5

% of Teachers with Out-of-Field Permits

Plaintiff Non-Plaintiff

Student Characteristics and Teacher Qualifications For Plaintiff & Non-Plaintiff Districts

Page 24: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

13.4

5.1

0

5

10

15

% of Teachers with Substandard Certificates

Plaintiff Non-Plaintiff

Student Characteristics and Teacher Qualifications For Plaintiff & Non-Plaintiff Districts

Page 25: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Some SayLet’s WaitAnd See

Page 26: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Gov. Miles McSweeney1903 General Assembly Address

“Yet the bare facts of the condition of the average school in some counties are shocking.”

“If the Legislature will discharge its responsibility to the cause of education in its entirety in the State, there must be State aid to the public schools.”

Page 27: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.
Page 28: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.
Page 29: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.
Page 30: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Gov. Coleman Blease1913 Second Inaugural Address

“If you will travel through the country and see the unclean, uncomfortable, ragged and unpatched – to express it in a word, most miserable looking buildings, that are called school houses, and not feel ashamed of what your State is doing for the education of her future citizens, then surely you have no sense of shame. Gentleman, I can not paint the picture too black – school houses with holes in the walls and floors and roofs, where children have to huddle together to keep warm; school houses so small and so crowded that children must be so close together they actually have to breathe into their lungs the breath which comes from the bodies of others.”

Page 31: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.
Page 32: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.
Page 33: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.
Page 34: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

1932 James Hope SuperintendentGeneral Report

“Until the problem is solved, South Carolina will never realize for her children the ideal that should be the goal in every democracy-equality of educational opportunity for every child.”

Page 35: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Journal of the House,Gov. Robert E. McNair, Jan. 15, 1969

“Despite our increased commitment to education, we know that only one of every two children who enters the first grade in South Carolina will graduate from high school. Statistics tell us that one out of every ten children entering the first grade is so poorly prepared he will repeat that grade.”

Page 36: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

2001 Edition Ranking of Counties and School Districts Percentage of Students who enter the first

grade, but don’t graduate from the twelfth. Dillon 2 52.4% Allendale 57.0% Lee 60.7% Hampton 2 61.9%

Page 37: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Gov. Richard W. RileyJanuary 11, 1984

“Industrial development truly begins in the classroom. Being 50th in support of education sends a message: it tells potential industries that we don’t expect much from ourselves or our future. It says that Georgia and North Carolina have more confidence in their children than we do.”

Page 38: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.”

Page 39: Abbeville v. The State of South Carolina, et al.

LAW, JUSTICE, AND THE CONSTITUTION

South Carolina'sUnrealized Dream


Recommended